inApp
Language learning

Lingvano - Learn Sign Language reviews

What users love and hate, from real reviews

A Duolingo-style sign-language course (ASL/BSL and more) built on short video lessons — it teaches clearly and joyfully, but nearly all the content sits behind a steep subscription, which stings for an audience that needs signing to communicate, not for fun.

500reviews analyzed
3.9average rating
12findings
Strengths

What users love

Short video lessons that are clear and addictive

The core strength: bite-size lessons with real video (not 2D diagrams) that are easy to follow at your own pace. People say they learned more than in years of school classes, and that it's genuinely fun.

Self-paced learning is what people love most

Going slow, calm and pressure-free is a key reason people get attached. They value that the app doesn't rush, recycles material and lets you feel daily progress.

Multiple signers in the videos teach you to recognise variations

A real strength of the method: signs are shown by several different people, so you learn to recognise one sign performed in different ways and see regional variations — closer to real-world conversation.

It actually helps people communicate with loved ones and at work

A strong emotional payoff: people learn to talk with a deaf child, brother, granddaughter or customers at work — and it works. For many, the app makes real communication attainable.

Weak spots

What users hate

Only a couple of free chapters, then a hard paywall

Users get through 2-3 chapters (often in about five minutes) and hit a wall: you can only keep learning by subscribing. Many feel misled after the «like Duolingo» pitch and uninstall right at that screen.

Auslan is promised in the title but isn't in the app

Australians download it as an «Auslan resource» per the description, then at language selection see only ASL, BSL and Austrian ÖGS — no Australian sign at all. They feel duped by false advertising and uninstall immediately.

The subscription is steep — especially for those who need signing to communicate

Prices around $17/mo or roughly $100-125/yr strike many as outrageous «in this economy». It hits hardest for deaf users, broke teens and people on fixed incomes, who feel learning to communicate shouldn't cost this much.

No trial without a card, and cancelling is a nightmare

Getting the «7 free days» requires entering card details before seeing a single lesson. Cancelling runs through 4 screens plus a mandatory Google Play step — users report being charged anyway and read it as a bet on people forgetting.

AI use is alarming: «it can't do hands»

Users discover the app uses AI only after agreeing to the trial and start doubting the signs: the language is 99% hands, and AI is notorious for getting hands wrong. It breeds a fear of learning misinformation.

Too little content — the course runs out fast

Even paying users complain there aren't many lessons: the course is done in a couple of months, leaving only review of what you've covered. People want more dialogues and ongoing content to keep progressing.

Manipulative notifications push people away

Guilt-tripping pushes («you're hurting our feelings for not putting in 10 minutes») and nagging midnight reminders irritate users — some stop opening the app entirely after one.

No way to slow down videos or set your own level

Signs play at full speed with no slow-motion — if you miss it, you just rewatch over and over. There's also no placement test: people who already know the basics are forced to relearn «hello» and «thank you».

The whole nicheLanguage learning: what to build and where rivals fall shortSee the niche breakdown