Skip to content
App
  • 48 of 100 · reviews
  • 4.1of 5 · store
  • 7,051ratings on the App Store
  • 477reviews read

An editorial reading of the saved reviews

A free crowd-sourced identifier with no subscription, which people love and use in school classes, and the consistency of its result earns trust unlike its rivals. But you pay with attention: ads on open, before submitting a photo, layered over another ad, and because of them the shot gets lost and you have to retake it several times. Accuracy is middling, it sometimes returns just tree instead of a maple species, and descriptions occasionally come in Chinese rather than English.

Screenshots

What people use it for

Students and anyone wanting free plant ID who can tolerate ads in exchange for no subscription

What reviews praise

Free and no subscription, a stable repeatable result earns trust, handy in class, simple ID from a photo

What reviews complain about

A flood of ads on every action, the photo gets lost to ads and needs retaking, descriptions sometimes in Chinese, results too generic like just tree

What users experience

2 excerpts from the breakdown. These are individual cases, not a verdict on all users.

Tried several apps and they gave me a different ID on one plant every time I submitted a photo. This app comes up with the same result every time so I trust the results more.
I expected a bit more info on tree I'd than "maple" Absolutely worthless. I took a picture of a maple tree sapling 6" high. The iplant I'd?: Tree

Other apps in this topic

Full ranking: Plant and animal identification48 apps with screenshots and scores
All reviews of this appFull texts, ratings and topics of every review

This is material from the inApp archive. Before installing, check the app’s current terms and features in the store.