Maya - Period & Health
authentic ratingOne of the most accurate trackers for long and irregular cycles: users with history going back to 2013 describe accumulated accuracy. The interface is mature and uncluttered. After a rebrand, the base version now limits history to six months.
62real score
4.8store star
3,008ratings
About the rating
500 reviews, 87% five-stars, text average 4.5, good alignment. Criticism is specific and dated: the shift to ads in 2023 and 2024, the six-month history cap, specific bugs after a February 2016 update. Long-term users describe how the algorithm adapts to irregular cycles. That is not a template.
Strengths
What users love
- Accumulated accuracy for long and irregular cycles: the longer you track
- The more precise the prediction. A mature interface without excess animation or pastel tones. Data going back to 2013 stays stable for long-term users.
Weak spots
What users hate
- History in the base version is cut to the last six months
- Which breaks the main value proposition for those who have tracked for years. Cycles longer than 99 days during perimenopause are not supported. Shortened symptom labels after an update have become hard to read.
Who it is for
Those with irregular cycles who are willing to use the app for at least 3 to 4 months so the algorithm can build accuracy.
Screenshots
