Authors ask for their zone and the actual start of planting to be taken into account. A useful test is adding a crop that has already been planted and correcting the dates for your own plot.
Welche Apps genutzt werden
Diese Apps werden in der Analyse dieser Aufgabe genannt. Öffne jede, um Stärken und Grenzen zu vergleichen. Die Reihenfolge der Liste ist keine Rangliste der Eignung.
Platz 2. Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 9.214 Bewertungen
72von 100
A real vegetable garden planning tool with educational videos from the team and concrete advice on sowing and care. The main limitations are product-level: no watering reminders, poor support for large beds and containers.
Gelobt: Users grew their first harvest from scratch and learned gardening through the built-in guides and the team's YouTube support.
Kritik: No watering or fertilizing reminders, bed size is limited, and container growing is not supported.
Für wen: The beginner gardener planning traditional in-ground rows
Platz 7. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 420 Bewertungen
62von 100
A strong seasonal garden planner that auto-generates tasks by crop and reschedules when dates shift. The main weakness is that planting dates sometimes miss the mark for local conditions, and the mobile interface scales poorly on iPad.
Gelobt: Automatic task rescheduling when a planting date changes saves gardeners a lot of manual work.
Kritik: Hard to use if you have already planted something: the app is designed for starting from scratch.
Für wen: Gardeners who plan their season in advance and want a structured task calendar
Platz 13. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 3.873 Bewertungen
55von 100
A niche garden planner with companion planting logic and sowing schedules. Real fans use it for years to manage crop rotation. Weak spots: no automatic zone detection and an incomplete crop database.
Gelobt: Companion planting and crop rotation logic works and helps plan bed layouts for the season.
Kritik: No automatic planting zone detection, and many basic vegetables are missing from the database.
Für wen: Gardeners with raised beds or a greenhouse
Platz 25. Wert aus Rezensionen: 40 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 13.269 Bewertungen
40von 100
A garden planner with a visual bed layout and watering schedule, but weather data is regularly wrong: after 100mm of rain it still tells you to water. The crop variety database is thin, and agronomic advice is sometimes incorrect, such as squash family sowing recommendations.
Gelobt: Visual garden layout with companion planting helps plan bed arrangements.
Kritik: Weather integration is unreliable, making the watering schedule more harmful than helpful.
Für wen: Gardener who needs a visual bed layout tool
Platz 20. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 398 Bewertungen
48von 100
The concept is right: a planting calendar localized by climate zone with a task list. But recommended dates are sometimes off by a month from reality, and the app regularly loses data after updates.
Gelobt: Users appreciate that the app adapts the planting schedule to their specific region.
Kritik: The crop list is limited, has no search, and adding a non-standard plant is impossible.
Für wen: Beginning gardeners in US climate zones who can tolerate occasional data loss
