inApp
Rating: AI assistants

Claude by Anthropic

authentic rating

The best model for deep document and text work, but the mobile app falls noticeably short of the web version.

68real score
4.7store star
186,833ratings
About the rating

Store rating 4.72 versus textAvg 3.15 the gap is explainable: 186K ratings, silent five-stars. Real concrete reviews: 'best for documents', 'helps with research', a poem dedicated to the model.

Strengths

What users love

  • Strong structured reasoning and precision on research tasks. People pay for it alongside ChatGPT and stick with it specifically for document work.
Weak spots

What users hate

  • The mobile app loses sync across devices and chat history disappears. Memory does not clear correctly and drags context from old sessions into new ones.

Who it is for

Analysts, editors, and researchers anyone who works with long texts and documents.

Screenshots