Test whether an order of the queue set by the user helps a large collection be heard in full, and whether the history helps people return to albums they have played.
Which apps people use
These apps are mentioned in the breakdown of this job. Open each one to compare strengths and limits. The order of the list is not a ranking of fitness.
Rank 1. Review score: 74 out of 100. App Store rating: 4.8★ · 40,652,628 ratings
74of 100
A mature streaming service with a strong recommendation engine and an enormous catalog. Its one core product flaw: the shuffle algorithm keeps cycling through the same 20 tracks from a thousand-song playlist.
Praised: Personalized mixes and stations reliably match the mood and regularly surface new artists.
Complaints: The shuffle algorithm loops through the same songs instead of covering the full playlist evenly.
Best for: Listeners who care about personalization and discovering new music
Rank 12. Review score: 63 out of 100. App Store rating: 4.9★ · 1,901 ratings
63of 100
A strong concept for people who want to keep a listening diary and rank albums the way Letterboxd works for films. The community is active, the developer is responsive, but the app crashes and lags frequently enough to make it hard to use.
Praised: A community of genuine music enthusiasts and an attentive developer create a rare sense of trust.
Complaints: You cannot log a listen with a past date, which breaks the diary-keeping experience.
Best for: Listeners who enjoy consciously tracking and rating albums
Rank 38. Review score: 44 out of 100. App Store rating: 4.6★ · 46,078 ratings
44of 100
Stats.fm was an excellent tool for tracking listening history and comparing tastes with friends, but data accuracy now falls short: missed minutes, incorrect first-listen dates, and broken Apple Music integration. The Soulmates feature, valued by many for connecting with people through music taste, has been removed.
Praised: Detailed lifetime listening history broken down by track, artist, and time period.
Complaints: Statistics have become inaccurate: listens disappear, dates shift, and Apple Music sync periodically breaks.
Best for: Fans who want to track and compare their music history
Rank 7. Review score: 67 out of 100. App Store rating: 4.9★ · 2,874,698 ratings
67of 100
A catalog of over 100 million tracks and lossless audio quality make Apple Music a strong choice for audiophiles within the Apple ecosystem. The interface gets redesigned regularly without improving navigation logic, and the recommendation algorithm is slow to learn the user's taste.
Praised: Audio quality is flawless, and integration with Apple devices and CarPlay is frictionless.
Complaints: The recommendation algorithm is hard to train to your taste: the app stubbornly pushes popular music instead of niche picks.
Best for: Audiophiles in the Apple ecosystem with an already well-formed music taste
Rank 31. Review score: 52 out of 100. App Store rating: 4.6★ · 18,890 ratings
52of 100
An affordable Spotify alternative with playlist import from other services attracts users who need flexibility without the high price. The key problem is unstable playback: shuffle freezes, the queue behaves unpredictably, and this gets in the way of daily use.
Praised: The ability to import ready-made playlists from Spotify and other services without manual entry saves hours when switching platforms.
Complaints: Shuffle mode regularly freezes on a few tracks and stops playing instead of cycling through the full collection.
Best for: Former Spotify users looking for a more affordable replacement while keeping their playlists