Die Texte zu den Apps sind auf Englisch.
People writing in a non-native language for work
Diese Apps werden in der Analyse dieser Aufgabe genannt. Öffne jede, um Stärken und Grenzen zu vergleichen. Die Reihenfolge der Liste ist keine Rangliste der Eignung.
Grammarly remains a strong tool for real-time grammar and style checking, especially in keyboard mode. However, AI rephrasing often distorts meaning, and the aggressive paywall is frustrating.
Gelobt: Keyboard mode works directly in any app and highlights errors immediately.
Kritik: AI tone-reframing changes the meaning of what you wrote instead of improving the form.
Für wen: Native speakers who need a quick grammar checker
QuillBot genuinely helps with paraphrasing and improving text, especially for non-native speakers. After recent updates, the quality of a second round of editing has degraded, and the free mode has become nearly worthless.
Gelobt: Natively paraphrases and finds better word choices so that text sounds more polished and precise.
Kritik: A second round of editing often merges words and breaks sentences that were already correct.
Für wen: Non-native speakers writing in English
Ginger Writer works as a grammar checker and rephraser, catches errors that Grammarly misses, and offers several rephrasing options. The interface feels dated, and there is no custom dictionary or keyboard extension for iOS.
Gelobt: Multiple rephrasing options make it quick to pick the best version.
Kritik: Misses articles in simple sentences and does not support custom writing styles.
Für wen: Non-native English speakers who need to check their English text
OpenAI's flagship AI assistant with broad capabilities for editing, rewriting, and structuring text. The main weakness: the model hallucinates on facts and loses context in long sessions.
Gelobt: Handles complex editing and style requests faster and more accurately than a search engine.
Kritik: Memory between sessions is inconsistent and sometimes mixes another conversation's context into the current one.
Für wen: Anyone who writes regularly and wants a general-purpose AI assistant
Claude as a model is highly regarded for reasoning quality and writing assistance, but the mobile app is regularly criticized for instability, crashes, and poor support. The product is stronger on the web.
Gelobt: The quality of responses on text and nuance of phrasing is above most competitors.
Kritik: The mobile app frequently freezes, loses chats, and is not adapted for assistive technologies.
Für wen: Writers and developers who work through a browser
