Need a first resume from scratch, fast and without knowing the structure. This also covers people who haven’t written a resume in years and are back on the job market.
Someone writing a first resume is helped by questions about their experience and by examples of what to fill in. An AI edit has to keep the original meaning and have an undo.
Welche Apps genutzt werden
Diese Apps werden in der Analyse dieser Aufgabe genannt. Öffne jede, um Stärken und Grenzen zu vergleichen. Die Reihenfolge der Liste ist keine Rangliste der Eignung.
Platz 3. Wert aus Rezensionen: 56 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 72.639 Bewertungen
56von 100
A simple builder with no unnecessary clutter. Gets the job done for a quick task, but is very limited: only one free template, no option to import an existing resume, and no landscape orientation support. The cover letter feature is mentioned but not fleshed out.
Gelobt: A resume comes together in minutes with no sign-up needed the step-by-step input keeps you focused and avoids choice overload.
Kritik: Only one free template, no import of an existing document, and sharing or downloading the file requires a subscription.
Für wen: Someone with no resume-writing experience who needs a first draft right now, from their phone.
Platz 5. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 1.542 Bewertungen
52von 100
The AI assistant builds resume sections through a Q&A flow. Importing an existing resume is destructive: it collapses job titles into generic versions and drops details. The coin-based monetization layered on top of a subscription frustrates users who are already paying.
Gelobt: The Q&A format lowers the barrier for people who do not know where to start, and produces a result in about 5 minutes.
Kritik: Importing a resume overwrites original job titles with generic placeholders. Academic CV format (long-form) is not supported.
Für wen: A job seeker writing their first resume who needs guidance on what to include.
Platz 21. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.039 Bewertungen
22von 100
The app generates a CV through AI, but users who left substantive reviews note that the generated text cannot be meaningfully edited, and downloading the finished document causes problems. The actual product experience is almost invisible behind a layer of identical five-star ratings.
Gelobt: AI handles the initial draft, which lowers the barrier for people who do not know how to phrase their experience.
Kritik: AI-generated wording cannot be edited at a granular level after generation. Export is unstable. The review sample is too small and uniform to draw reliable conclusions about actual quality.
Für wen: Someone who has never written a resume and wants to get something down quickly without worrying about the details.
Platz 23. Wert aus Rezensionen: 12 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 3,7★ · 1.465 Bewertungen
12von 100
Templates are locked until payment, custom sections cannot be added, and template previews are unavailable. The app effectively just collects your data and then demands payment at the final step.
Gelobt: Nothing specific could be identified from the reviews.
Kritik: Templates cannot be previewed before selection. Custom sections are not available. The interface does not respond to taps in several scenarios.
Für wen: Not relevant the app does not fulfill the basic function of a resume builder.
Platz 7. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.286 Bewertungen
48von 100
An AI editor with a clean fill-in flow. The core mechanic AI automatically rephrasing your entered experience is appreciated by most users, but some lose nuances from the original. Export is hidden behind a paywall in a way that is not obvious: users find out only after filling everything in.
Gelobt: Fast to fill out and easy to edit after saving.
Kritik: AI sometimes replaces specific wording with generic phrases and there is no way to undo it. The download button does not work for some users even after payment.
Für wen: Someone who wants AI to improve their wording and is willing to review the result before sending.
