In the reviews people ask for a long CV and extended sections. It helps to test a multi-page document, the publications and the exported result, while keeping manual settings.
Welche Apps genutzt werden
Diese Apps werden in der Analyse dieser Aufgabe genannt. Öffne jede, um Stärken und Grenzen zu vergleichen. Die Reihenfolge der Liste ist keine Rangliste der Eignung.
Platz 1. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 3.891 Bewertungen
60von 100
The best templates in this category by far: unconventional layouts that stand out from generic ATS-friendly one-pagers, making them a solid pick for creative and design-oriented fields. The AI assistant rewrites job descriptions into cleaner, sharper language. The mobile experience is noticeably weaker than the web: crashes during editing, no back button, and preview is thumbnail-only.
Gelobt: A wide range of distinctive templates plus an AI rephrasing tool for experience descriptions both tools genuinely speed up writing.
Kritik: The mobile editor crashes when typing in the experience field, there is no full-size document preview, and there is no back button.
Für wen: Someone who wants a template that does not look like everyone else's and is comfortable finishing the resume on a desktop.
Platz 4. Wert aus Rezensionen: 56 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.495 Bewertungen
56von 100
A lightweight editor with a sensible structure and clean, watermark-free templates. Two free exports is a fair threshold. The AI rephrasing feature is available as a paid add-on and is not pushed aggressively. The weak point is rigid bullet formatting in the experience section that cannot be removed or reformatted.
Gelobt: Templates without watermarks, actual employer callbacks noted by several users, and fast updates for a specific role.
Kritik: Forced bullet points in the experience section cannot be turned off, section titles cannot be changed, no cover letter.
Für wen: Someone who needs to update their resume quickly for a new role without fiddling with settings.
Platz 8. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 39.267 Bewertungen
44von 100
AI suggestions while editing text work and are valued, but PDF export is systemically broken the resume disappears or fails to open after generation. The font in print view shifts, and capitalization changes on its own. Not reliable for the core task of downloading and sending.
Gelobt: AI rewrites and improves job responsibility text right in the editor users say it speeds up the process.
Kritik: PDF export is unstable: the file does not save, fonts and capitalization shift in print view, and support is unreachable.
Für wen: Someone who wants help with wording but is prepared to run the final document through a different tool to actually get the file.
Platz 16. Wert aus Rezensionen: 34 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 13.672 Bewertungen
34von 100
The web version works well and produces clean templates, but the mobile app is a separate product with systemic crashes: trying to open or save a resume closes the app and loses progress. For the mobile audience it is effectively unusable.
Gelobt: Templates are clean and readable, the input structure is straightforward, and the fill-in process raises no questions.
Kritik: The mobile app crashes when opening a saved resume or saving new data progress is lost without warning.
Für wen: A user who works through a browser on a computer and just wants to download a PDF.
Platz 5. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 1.542 Bewertungen
52von 100
The AI assistant builds resume sections through a Q&A flow. Importing an existing resume is destructive: it collapses job titles into generic versions and drops details. The coin-based monetization layered on top of a subscription frustrates users who are already paying.
Gelobt: The Q&A format lowers the barrier for people who do not know where to start, and produces a result in about 5 minutes.
Kritik: Importing a resume overwrites original job titles with generic placeholders. Academic CV format (long-form) is not supported.
Für wen: A job seeker writing their first resume who needs guidance on what to include.