本文へスキップ
課題から選ぶ

Rewrites raw AI text into their own voice and gets it to sound human

文章のAIアシスタント

アプリについての本文は英語です。

Content writers humanizing AI text

使われているアプリ

これらのアプリはこの課題の分析で言及されています。それぞれを開いて、強みと限界を比べてください。並び順は適合度の順位ではありません。

  1. Grammarly: AI Keyboard & Notes

    5位。レビュースコア:62/100。App Storeの評価: 4.7★・217,772件の評価

    Grammarly remains a strong tool for real-time grammar and style checking, especially in keyboard mode. However, AI rephrasing often distorts meaning, and the aggressive paywall is frustrating.

    評価点:Keyboard mode works directly in any app and highlights errors immediately.

    不満点:AI tone-reframing changes the meaning of what you wrote instead of improving the form.

    向いている人:Native speakers who need a quick grammar checker

  2. Wordtune: AI Writing Keyboard

    36位。レビュースコア:38/100。App Storeの評価: 4.4★・969件の評価

    Wordtune was a useful keyboard paraphrasing tool, but after the 2024 redesign the core feature became unstable or disappeared entirely. Paying users are complaining broadly about a regression in suggestion quality.

    評価点:Rephrasing variations directly in the keyboard without switching apps.

    不満点:After the update the model picks worse suggestions than it did a year ago.

    向いている人:People who write a lot in messaging apps and want to quickly improve their tone

  3. Claude by Anthropic

    11位。レビュースコア:55/100。App Storeの評価: 4.7★・185,034件の評価

    Claude as a model is highly regarded for reasoning quality and writing assistance, but the mobile app is regularly criticized for instability, crashes, and poor support. The product is stronger on the web.

    評価点:The quality of responses on text and nuance of phrasing is above most competitors.

    不満点:The mobile app frequently freezes, loses chats, and is not adapted for assistive technologies.

    向いている人:Writers and developers who work through a browser

  4. ChatGPT

    1位。レビュースコア:72/100。App Storeの評価: 4.8★・8,239,403件の評価

    OpenAI's flagship AI assistant with broad capabilities for editing, rewriting, and structuring text. The main weakness: the model hallucinates on facts and loses context in long sessions.

    評価点:Handles complex editing and style requests faster and more accurately than a search engine.

    不満点:Memory between sessions is inconsistent and sometimes mixes another conversation's context into the current one.

    向いている人:Anyone who writes regularly and wants a general-purpose AI assistant

  5. Quillbot-AI Writing & Keyboard

    17位。レビュースコア:52/100。App Storeの評価: 4.7★・2,755件の評価

    QuillBot genuinely helps with paraphrasing and improving text, especially for non-native speakers. After recent updates, the quality of a second round of editing has degraded, and the free mode has become nearly worthless.

    評価点:Natively paraphrases and finds better word choices so that text sounds more polished and precise.

    不満点:A second round of editing often merges words and breaks sentences that were already correct.

    向いている人:Non-native speakers writing in English

このテーマのほかの課題

ランキング全体:文章のAIアシスタントスクリーンショットとスコア付きの87アプリこの分析の出どころリサーチとレビューからの所見を読む