Crypto and investing · 93 Apps · 25.922 gelesene Rezensionen
Die Texte zu den Apps sind auf Englisch.
Where the wallet and exchange are honest and reliable, and where funds suddenly end up frozen. Die besten Werte aus den Rezensionstexten: MetaTrader 5 (74/100), Solflare (74) und River (72).
Wert aus Rezensionen: 74 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 76.641 Bewertungen
74von 100
MetaTrader 5 remains the industry standard for professional trading: it connects to hundreds of brokers and supports scripts and expert advisors. The mobile version falls short of desktop when it comes to placing stop-losses and take-profits, especially on a tablet.
Gelobt
Compatibility with any broker and a complete technical-analysis toolkit all in one app.
Kritik
Setting a stop-loss and take-profit on a mobile screen is awkward: the lines appear outside the visible area.
Für wen: A professional trader working through a broker with an MT5 connector.
Wert aus Rezensionen: 74 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 9.579 Bewertungen
74von 100
Solflare is rightly considered the reference non-custodial wallet for the Solana ecosystem: staking, DeFi, and swaps are implemented natively and run reliably. Occasional regressions after updates and a disappearing transaction tab spoil the picture.
Gelobt
Native SOL staking and interaction with DeFi protocols directly from the wallet, no redirects needed.
Kritik
Updates sometimes remove key screens, like transaction history, for several versions in a row.
Für wen: Active participants in the Solana ecosystem, from staking to DeFi.
Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 8.275 Bewertungen
72von 100
River handles the core job well: buy bitcoin, set up recurring purchases, and stop worrying about custody. The serious flaw is opaque account closures with no explanation, which erodes trust in the platform.
Gelobt
Built-in DCA with a flexible schedule and proof of reserves make accumulating bitcoin nearly automatic.
Kritik
Accounts are closed without warning or explanation, sometimes right after a deposit.
Für wen: Americans who want to methodically stack bitcoin without extra coins or complexity.
Platz 4. Wert aus Rezensionen: 70 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 23.095 Bewertungen
70von 100
The best hardware wallet in the category for the balance of simplicity and security: an NFC card instead of a device and a straightforward onboarding flow. Key gaps: no purchase average price display, transaction history not working for all assets, and some promised networks waiting for support for months.
Gelobt: An NFC card instead of a bulky device, plus full self-custody without a seed phrase in the cloud.
Kritik: No display of average purchase price or total return per asset in the portfolio.
Für wen: A crypto holder who puts storage security above trading convenience.
Platz 5. Wert aus Rezensionen: 70 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 4.196 Bewertungen
70von 100
Rainbow stands out for exceptionally well-crafted mobile UX among Ethereum wallets, and its audience values that, but periodic browser crashes and unstable WalletConnect behavior limit its use as a full DeFi tool.
Gelobt: Interaction patterns are designed for touchscreens so carefully that using the wallet feels natural.
Kritik: Custom RPC provider is unavailable in the mobile version even though the browser extension has it.
Für wen: Active Ethereum ecosystem participants who care about design.
Platz 6. Wert aus Rezensionen: 67 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 13.201 Bewertungen
67von 100
Tastytrade is rightly considered the best mobile platform for options trading in terms of execution quality and position analysis screen design. The main issues are post-update stability and stale watchlist quotes.
Gelobt: Depth of options analysis tools on mobile that competitors do not match.
Kritik: After updates the platform periodically breaks: P/L resets to zero, quotes freeze, trade notifications duplicate.
Für wen: Active options traders working from their phone.
Platz 7. Wert aus Rezensionen: 67 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 5.648 Bewertungen
67von 100
CoinGlass is the most informative tool for analyzing market positioning: liquidation maps, long/short data, and on-chain metrics in one place without ads. The mobile version falls short of desktop in functionality, and filters behave inconsistently.
Gelobt: Liquidation maps and the long/short ratio give real insight into market tension ahead of key levels.
Kritik: Filters require an app restart, and liquidation maps on mobile cannot be scaled the same way as on desktop.
Für wen: Active traders who analyze market structure before opening positions.
Platz 8. Wert aus Rezensionen: 67 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 4.957 Bewertungen
67von 100
DEX Screener is the best mobile tool for monitoring decentralized pairs: data depth, multi-chain coverage, and quote refresh speed are valued by memecoin traders. The main pain points are unreliable alerts and removed chart drawing tools.
Gelobt: Complete DEX pair data across dozens of networks in one place with fast search.
Kritik: Alerts fire inconsistently or not at all, which is critical for scalpers.
Für wen: Active traders in decentralized networks and hunters of new tokens.
Platz 9. Wert aus Rezensionen: 66 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 32.612 Bewertungen
66von 100
A reliable exchange with a clear interface and a wide range of assets that has built loyal users over time. The main product-level complaint: transferring funds requires manual email back-and-forth instead of an automated flow.
Gelobt: Wide asset selection and a sense of reliability from long-term users who describe it as honest and straightforward.
Kritik: Transferring an account to another broker requires manual email chains of 10 or more messages with no clear instructions.
Für wen: An experienced trader for whom breadth of instruments and exchange reputation matter.
Platz 10. Wert aus Rezensionen: 66 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 4.213 Bewertungen
66von 100
Cake Wallet fills the rare niche of privacy coins with a genuinely working Monero wallet and responsive support, but the UI is unstable between updates and some swaps hang with no way to exit.
Gelobt: Monero and privacy coin support at a level unavailable in most wallets.
Kritik: The interface behaves unpredictably when switching between multiple wallets in a single session.
Für wen: Users for whom transaction privacy matters more than convenience.
Platz 11. Wert aus Rezensionen: 63 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 3.995 Bewertungen
63von 100
Swan Bitcoin handles its single job well: scheduled bitcoin purchases on autopilot. But session authentication problems and opaque withdrawal timelines create anxiety when dealing with real amounts.
Gelobt: Simple automated bitcoin purchases on a schedule with no extra steps or distracting assets.
Kritik: No display of unrealized profit or cost basis, so the user cannot see the real picture of their investment.
Für wen: Long-term bitcoin accumulators who practice regular purchases.
Platz 12. Wert aus Rezensionen: 63 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 3.002 Bewertungen
63von 100
A convenient exchange for spot trading and futures with low fees and copy trading, but US users are blocked and the SMS code system for withdrawals periodically stops working.
Gelobt: Low fees, robust copy trading, and a user-friendly mobile interface for futures.
Kritik: The TP order system has a 2000% PnL profit cap, which prevents holding a position through extreme moves.
Für wen: Traders from CIS countries and Latin America looking for a Binance alternative.
Platz 13. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 36.468 Bewertungen
62von 100
Good analytical tools for an active trader: solid charts, backtesting, and multi-instrument coverage. Restricting access to certain stocks undermines the platform's value for experienced users.
Gelobt: Everything in one screen: stocks, warrants, options, futures, plus live charts straight from a smartphone.
Kritik: The platform started limiting available instruments and traders are moving to alternatives.
Für wen: Beginner to intermediate traders who want a rich analytical interface.
Platz 14. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 15.002 Bewertungen
62von 100
The best hardware wallet on the market for reliable asset protection with a solid mobile companion. The main issue of recent months: the mobile app has noticeably declined in stability, with more frequent crashes and freezes when connecting to the device.
Gelobt: The gold standard for cold crypto storage: private keys never leave the device.
Kritik: The mobile app has become unstable after recent updates, with Bluetooth reconnecting on its own.
Für wen: Long-term holders who store significant amounts and do not trade daily.
Platz 15. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 4.396 Bewertungen
62von 100
Zengo stands out for its no-seed-phrase model and is perceived as a reliable non-custodial wallet, but transaction send failures and weak support undermine trust exactly when it is needed most.
Gelobt: Biometric protection without a seed phrase gives a sense of security without technical complexity.
Kritik: Transactions hang without a clear reason, and support responds with scripts and does not resolve real problems.
Für wen: Crypto beginners for whom security matters without complicated setup.
Platz 16. Wert aus Rezensionen: 61 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 7.951 Bewertungen
61von 100
Pera is the best option for those working with Algorand: transactions are instant, network fees are negligible, and WalletConnect is built in. The main pain points are high swap fees inside the app and occasional errors during swaps.
Gelobt: Algorand network transactions settle in seconds at a fraction of a cent in fees.
Kritik: Swapping tokens inside the app costs more than on external platforms.
Für wen: ALGO holders and active participants in the Algorand ecosystem.
Platz 17. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 5.557 Bewertungen
60von 100
Bitget Wallet handles the core job of non-custodial storage and works with a large number of networks. The GetGas feature helps new users solve the gas problem, but the trading module runs inconsistently and data delays have led to real losses.
Gelobt: The auto gas-fetch feature lets you work with tokens on new networks without buying the native token first.
Kritik: Data in the trading module updates with a delay, which is critical during active trading.
Für wen: DeFi users who need a non-custodial wallet with multi-network support.
Platz 18. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 171.720 Bewertungen
58von 100
CoinMarketCap is the de facto standard for tracking the crypto market: data on thousands of coins, exchange volumes, historical charts, and a portfolio tracker all work reliably. Recent updates added intrusive ads on launch and an aggressive Alpha section replacing familiar news, noticeably degrading the daily experience.
Gelobt: Market data is exhaustive: finding any coin with volume and history takes seconds.
Kritik: Launch ads and replacing the news section with an opaque Alpha section irritate regular users.
Für wen: A crypto investor who needs one source for market data.
Platz 19. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 25.429 Bewertungen
58von 100
A professional trading tool with a good interface and limit orders, but with noticeable chart lag relative to order book data, which is critical for precise entry. Support has been fully handed over to AI with no access to a live agent.
Gelobt: Advanced order types, trailing stop, and a customizable interface are valued by active traders.
Kritik: The chart lags behind order book data, causing stop-losses and entry points to trigger incorrectly.
Für wen: An experienced active trader who needs a professional terminal on a smartphone.
Platz 20. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 19.252 Bewertungen
58von 100
Best-in-class non-custodial wallet for Web3 with reliable DEX swapping and good multi-network support. The main problem right now: the mobile app has degraded in speed, with launch times growing to 3 to 5 minutes, which is critical for trading.
Gelobt: Non-custodial swap directly in the wallet without registration or verification.
Kritik: The app takes several minutes to launch and is unstable on iOS, while the browser extension works fine.
Für wen: DeFi users working with tokens not available on major exchanges.
Platz 21. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 6.412 Bewertungen
58von 100
CryptoPanic handles the job of quickly catching up with the crypto market news backdrop: it aggregates sources in one place and helps explain the why behind price moves. The downside is that the app has not been updated in years, notifications arrive an hour late, and the mobile UI suffers from small font.
Gelobt: Pulls news from specialized crypto publications into a single feed, saving time on monitoring.
Kritik: Notifications about important events arrive an hour or more late, making them useless for decision-making.
Für wen: Investors who need a quick news context without switching between websites.
Platz 22. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 5.259 Bewertungen
58von 100
Gate.io offers one of the widest asset catalogs among centralized exchanges, including US stocks, and is highly regarded by active traders. The main problem: account lockout when changing a phone number, verification stops working, and funds are effectively frozen permanently.
Gelobt: Huge selection of coins, crypto and US stocks in one app, highly rated by experienced traders.
Kritik: Losing access to the linked phone number means an irreversible account lockout with funds inside.
Für wen: Experienced traders who need a wide market and futures tools.
Platz 23. Wert aus Rezensionen: 57 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 83.745 Bewertungen
57von 100
Public stands out for support quality and a clean interface for long-term investing. The main product limitation: the options toolset has been incomplete for years, and data does not go below the one-minute timeframe.
Gelobt: Live and fast support that users praise as the best in the category.
Kritik: Options trading works inconsistently: rolling and selling options break with every major update.
Für wen: A passive stock and ETF investor who values service.
Platz 24. Wert aus Rezensionen: 57 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 27.891 Bewertungen
57von 100
A specialized Bitcoin service with Lightning support and direct paycheck-to-bitcoin debiting, which sets it apart from general exchanges. Weekly deposit limits and the inability to scan Lightning QR codes slow down more active users.
Gelobt: Direct paycheck-to-bitcoin routing and Lightning transfers in one app.
Kritik: Lightning QR codes do not work and users have to copy invoices manually, which is awkward for everyday payments.
Für wen: A bitcoin maximalist building an accumulation strategy through regular deposits.
Platz 25. Wert aus Rezensionen: 56 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 2.962 Bewertungen
56von 100
A non-custodial privacy-focused wallet supporting a wide range of networks and coins, but slow transactions and rare cases of balance disappearing during resync seriously undermine trust.
Gelobt: Support for many networks, built-in exchange, and a privacy focus with Nym mixnet integration.
Kritik: After a resync command the wallet sometimes shows a zero balance for up to several days, causing panic among users.
Für wen: Advanced users for whom privacy and self-custody matter.
Platz 26. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.794.834 Bewertungen
55von 100
Coinbase is the most accessible way for a beginner to enter crypto: verification works, trading is clear, and liquidity is there. The main weakness is holds on funds that appear unexpectedly, and support can take months to resolve an issue.
Gelobt: After verification, buying and selling bitcoin is easier here than anywhere else.
Kritik: Temporary holds on funds arrive with no clear explanation and can last for weeks.
Für wen: A beginner buying bitcoin or ether for the first time.
Platz 27. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 36.210 Bewertungen
55von 100
A beautiful and relatively accessible non-custodial wallet, but ETH staking hangs in an undefined state for extended periods, and navigating transaction history is not intuitive. Suitable for beginners with caveats.
Gelobt: A unique visual interface and wide coin support attract those who want to keep everything in one place.
Kritik: ETH staking enters limbo for months with no clear status or timeline.
Für wen: A crypto beginner looking for a beautiful and relatively simple wallet.
Platz 28. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 5.535 Bewertungen
55von 100
CoinTracking fills the niche of tax accounting and crypto portfolio tracking at a level most competitors cannot match. The mobile app is significantly weaker than the web version: transactions cannot be added manually, charts periodically stop working, and the interface is dated.
Gelobt: Automatic import from exchanges and tax-basis calculation under different accounting methods saves hours at year end.
Kritik: You cannot add a trade manually from the mobile app, so the core feature is unavailable on the go.
Für wen: Serious investors with portfolios across multiple exchanges who need tax accounting.
Platz 29. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 4.731 Bewertungen
55von 100
Zerion handles multi-chain portfolio aggregation well and can find hidden assets like Aave rewards that are unavailable in other wallets. Regularly breaking Ledger connectivity after updates is a serious issue for hardware wallet users.
Gelobt: A single dashboard for tracking assets across dozens of networks with accurate DeFi position display.
Kritik: Ledger hardware wallet integration is unstable and breaks after app updates.
Für wen: Advanced DeFi users with assets across multiple networks.
Platz 30. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 4.374 Bewertungen
55von 100
TabTrader works as a multi-exchange terminal with solid charts and alerts, but aggressively moving basic features behind a paywall and the gap between iOS and Android versions disappoint loyal users.
Gelobt: A unified terminal for multiple exchanges with customizable alerts saves time for experienced traders.
Kritik: iOS lacks API-based trading even though the Android version has had it for years.
Für wen: Traders working across multiple exchanges simultaneously.
Platz 31. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 337.014 Bewertungen
52von 100
Webull is built for serious traders: attractive charts, futures, advanced orders, and Turbo Trader genuinely set it apart among mobile brokers. The problem is periodic account restrictions without explanation and order execution bugs that are dangerous for active trading.
Gelobt: Charts and technical analysis tools on mobile are the best in their segment.
Kritik: Accounts go into restriction without warning and support does not respond for weeks.
Für wen: An active trader who needs futures and professional charts on a phone.
Platz 32. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 46.520 Bewertungen
52von 100
Crypto Pro offers a clean tracker with a friendly interface, metals support, and widgets. However, several key features have been broken for years without a fix: favorites are lost, widgets reset, and developers do not respond to user reports.
Gelobt: A clean and fast tracker interface with metals support and a customizable watchlist.
Kritik: The portfolio periodically wipes completely and restoring from an iCloud backup does not recover the data.
Für wen: A passive crypto holder watching prices without active trading.
Platz 33. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 20.155 Bewertungen
52von 100
A reliable tracker with solid price alerts and a handy portfolio that users have relied on for years. The main problem is not the data but infrastructure degradation: alerts stop working, deleted notifications keep firing, and support does not respond for months.
Gelobt: Price alerts work near real-time and have become a reliable tool for traders.
Kritik: Deleted alerts keep firing and it is impossible to fix this through support.
Für wen: Traders who need fast price monitoring without a built-in exchange.
Platz 34. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 11.369 Bewertungen
52von 100
Delta by eToro remains one of the best portfolio aggregators for those who hold both crypto and stocks in one place. The main weakness since the eToro transition: performance has dropped and support for many brokers has not materialized.
Gelobt: A single screen for crypto and equity portfolios with a pleasant visualization of performance.
Kritik: Sync with popular brokers like Schwab and Merrill Lynch is advertised but has not worked for years.
Für wen: Individual investors combining crypto and the stock market.
Platz 35. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 6.237 Bewertungen
52von 100
Changelly works as an aggregator for quick swaps between wallets, shows the network fee upfront, and does not hold assets. Weaknesses include high slippage through partners like Moonpay, no transaction history inside the app, and occasional execution delays.
Gelobt: Network fee breakdown is shown before confirming the swap, with no hidden markup at checkout.
Kritik: Transaction history is not accessible inside the app even though money flows through it.
Für wen: Users who need to quickly transfer assets between wallets without registering on an exchange.
Platz 36. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 3.492 Bewertungen
52von 100
The only exchange with instant bank deposit and withdrawal in the UAE around the clock, making it indispensable for local expats, but verification periodically blocks accounts without a clear explanation.
Gelobt: Instant bank transfers 24 hours a day in the UAE with no delays, unavailable on other platforms.
Kritik: The new interface removed the ability to sort coins and filter the list by active positions.
Für wen: Expats and residents of the UAE and Bahrain who actively trade crypto.
Platz 37. Wert aus Rezensionen: 51 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 3.603 Bewertungen
51von 100
A globally covered crypto card with fast transactions and Apple Pay, but after several updates the app stops opening and customer support is slow to respond.
Gelobt: The card works worldwide through Apple Pay and lets you pay with crypto where it is not accepted directly.
Kritik: A lifetime limit of five cards per account that does not reset even after deleting old cards.
Für wen: Those living in countries with limited access to payment infrastructure.
Platz 38. Wert aus Rezensionen: 49 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 2.959 Bewertungen
49von 100
A set of crypto market analysis tools with real data and screeners, but the search bar systematically breaks after updates and ads cannot be turned off in the paid version.
Gelobt: An extensive set of technical indicators and screeners with real-time quotes all in one place.
Kritik: After several updates, searching coins by symbol stopped working and searching by name returns an empty chart.
Für wen: Technical analysts who follow the market from their phone.
Platz 39. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 46.917 Bewertungen
48von 100
Bybit offers a broad trading toolkit for experienced traders with a solid derivatives lineup. The unresolved core product issue: two-factor authentication via Google Authenticator works with hour-long delays, and a recent navigation overhaul removed the persistent bottom bar.
Gelobt: A rich set of trading instruments including futures and options on a single platform.
Kritik: Two-factor authentication via Google Authenticator accepts codes with up to an hour delay, blocking access at the worst moment.
Für wen: An experienced derivatives trader outside the US.
Platz 40. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 9.745 Bewertungen
48von 100
eToro works as a social investing platform with copy trading and wide asset coverage, but withdrawals remain a painful process and the app is unstable during peak trading hours.
Gelobt: The social layer and copying trades from popular investors lowers the barrier to entry for beginners.
Kritik: Token delistings happen without in-app notifications, leaving users with positions they had no chance to exit.
Für wen: Beginner investors who want to follow experienced traders.
Platz 41. Wert aus Rezensionen: 47 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 3.573 Bewertungen
47von 100
A non-custodial wallet with multisig and broad coin support, but the purchase UX is confusing: you need to hold gas in the right network, and email support is slow.
Gelobt: A multi-currency non-custodial wallet with multisig support and easy gift card purchases.
Kritik: To send a token you must separately hold gas for the right network, which is never explained to newcomers.
Für wen: Those who want to hold crypto independently without relying on an exchange.
Platz 42. Wert aus Rezensionen: 45 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 44.076 Bewertungen
45von 100
Bitcoin.com Wallet works reliably as a non-custodial wallet for basic bitcoin storage and sending. The key product flaw is not the fee size itself but the opacity: the stated percentage differs from the final amount, and manual control over the network fee has been removed.
Gelobt: Non-custodial storage with a simple interface suits those holding bitcoin for the first time.
Kritik: Manual network fee selection has been removed, taking away control over transactions from experienced users.
Für wen: A newcomer who wants to buy and hold bitcoin once.
Platz 43. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 330.707 Bewertungen
44von 100
Crypto.com offers a wide range of coins, staking, and a beginner-friendly interface, but navigation to deposit and withdrawal is deliberately confusing, support is chatbot-only, and wallet lockouts lasting weeks leave users without access to their assets.
Gelobt: Coin variety and a simple purchase screen work well for those just getting started.
Kritik: Withdrawals and account management are buried several menu levels deep and the interface offers no forgiveness for mistakes.
Für wen: A newcomer who wants to buy coins beyond bitcoin and ether.
Platz 44. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 75.411 Bewertungen
44von 100
MetaMask remains the most widely used Web3 wallet with broad network and dApp support. The core product issue is not price but instability: after updates, network settings disappear, the interface lags, and scanning a QR code to send is hidden in a non-obvious menu.
Gelobt: Access to a vast dApp ecosystem and multi-network support in one wallet.
Kritik: The interface degrades after updates: network settings disappear, buttons get covered by the keyboard, and the hardware wallet via Bluetooth is unreliable.
Für wen: A DeFi and Web3 user with blockchain experience.
Platz 45. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 14.336 Bewertungen
44von 100
The only mainstream tool for tracking a crypto portfolio with a focus on tax reporting that actually works when set up correctly. The weak point: the mobile app syncs data slower than the web version and prices lag.
Gelobt: Automatically aggregates transactions from dozens of wallets and exchanges for a tax return.
Kritik: Portfolio balance in the app updates with a delay and may show incorrect profit/loss colors.
Für wen: Active traders working across multiple exchanges and preparing tax filings.
Platz 46. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 3.814 Bewertungen
44von 100
Arzdigital works as a crypto data aggregator for a Persian-speaking audience and handles its job in calm periods, but regular updates break the app: crashes after a release have become an expected pattern, not an exception.
Gelobt: A convenient watchlist and a Persian-language news feed address a real need for an audience without access to global platforms.
Kritik: Every major update is followed by widespread crashes and users have to wait weeks for a patch.
Für wen: Persian-speaking investors following the crypto market.
Platz 47. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 3.723 Bewertungen
44von 100
A TON ecosystem wallet with a clean interface, but it crashes regularly on specific devices and shows spam tokens on the balance that cannot be hidden. Removing the swap section has significantly cut the product's value.
Gelobt: Simple UX, fast navigation, and the Battery feature that covers the network fee on your behalf.
Kritik: Spam tokens appear in the balance and cannot be hidden, and the swap section was removed without a clear replacement.
Platz 48. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 2.483 Bewertungen
44von 100
The app offers a convenient portfolio tracker and flexible price alerts, but the iOS version is unstable: widgets break after updates, favorite coins reset, and crashes on launch are reported by many users.
Gelobt: An informative interface with a wide coin selection and functional home-screen widgets when they work.
Kritik: Favorite coins reset on their own and widgets stop updating after an update with no way to fix it short of reinstalling.
Für wen: Investors who need a tracker without trading.
Platz 49. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 385.581 Bewertungen
42von 100
SoFi tries to be a bank, broker, and crypto wallet all at once, but reliably handles none of those roles: promo bonuses are not paid out, IPO allocations are opaque, and the support chat crashes when you try to use it. The idea of combining everything in one place is appealing, but execution is rough enough to outweigh the convenience.
Gelobt: The ability to keep savings, stocks, and crypto in a single app is genuinely convenient.
Kritik: The investment section does not show accumulated P&L and lacks the tools needed to manage positions.
Für wen: Someone who wants one account instead of three separate apps.
Platz 50. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 89.292 Bewertungen
42von 100
Uphold wins on breadth of assets and staking unavailable at major competitors. However, the security system is too aggressive: accounts get blocked without warning for weeks and support goes silent.
Gelobt: Wide crypto asset selection and built-in staking in one place attract those who care about variety.
Kritik: The account-blocking algorithm triggers arbitrarily and leaves users without access to their funds for months with no explanation.
Für wen: Crypto holders with non-standard assets who are willing to accept unpredictable support.
Platz 51. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 35.380 Bewertungen
42von 100
Once the best crypto price aggregator, it has degraded: real-time data freezes regularly, notifications arrive 10 or more hours late, ads overlap charts, and support returns a 404. The core product is broken.
Gelobt: The simplicity and clarity of the portfolio tracker have not been surpassed by competitors in terms of usability.
Kritik: Prices stop updating in real time and price notifications arrive hours late, making them meaningless.
Für wen: A passive holder who needs rough tracking without precise timing.
Platz 52. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 12.924 Bewertungen
42von 100
CEX.IO operates as an exchange with a long history, but users regularly get stuck during verification or withdrawal without an explanation. Support is overloaded and responds slowly.
Gelobt: The platform runs stably for basic purchases and storage for those who passed verification without issues.
Kritik: The withdrawal process is opaque: errors appear without cause and users spend weeks trying to get their money out.
Für wen: Experienced users who have already passed KYC and do not plan frequent withdrawals.
Platz 53. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 5.167 Bewertungen
42von 100
Robinhood Wallet works as a basic non-custodial wallet on Ethereum, but after dropping Polygon it lost its main advantage of cheap swaps. Spam token filtering is weak, Bitcoin is not supported, and integration with the main Robinhood app is minimal.
Gelobt: A familiar brand and simple interface lower the barrier to non-custodial storage.
Kritik: Dropping Polygon support eliminated affordable swaps and left only expensive Ethereum.
Für wen: Robinhood users taking their first steps in self-custody crypto.
Platz 54. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 8.483.122 Bewertungen
38von 100
Cash App positions itself as a simple tool for money transfers and basic bitcoin storage, but the core problem is mass unexplained account blocks and situations where sent money never reaches the recipient. For a financial tool, reliability is everything, and that is precisely where it falls seriously short.
Gelobt: When everything works, transfers go through instantly and conveniently.
Kritik: Accounts are blocked without warning or explanation and appeals are automatically rejected.
Für wen: Someone who wants to quickly send a small amount to a friend.
Platz 55. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 63.336 Bewertungen
38von 100
Phantom won the market as the main Solana wallet, but aggressive interface overhauls after each update break familiar flows, and reports of coins disappearing during price spikes undermine trust in reliability. The product runs inconsistently for memecoin trading.
Gelobt: Transaction confirmation speed on Solana and the clean base interface design.
Kritik: Coins disappear from the portfolio during price spikes and reappear after the move, making active trading unreliable.
Für wen: A long-term Solana asset holder who is not actively trading.
Platz 56. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 16.359 Bewertungen
38von 100
A multi-network wallet with broad blockchain support and the SafePal S1 hardware wallet, but the portfolio updates incorrectly, transaction notifications do not work, and after app updates users lose access to tokens despite a saved seed phrase.
Gelobt: Supports more networks and coins than most competitors, including pairing with the hardware wallet.
Kritik: Portfolio balances show nonexistent tokens and fail to sync correctly after updates.
Für wen: Experienced holders of a large variety of coins across multiple networks.
Platz 57. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 12.455 Bewertungen
38von 100
LOBSTR remains a working wallet for XLM if all you need is to hold and send Stellar assets. Everything beyond that scenario, swapping, withdrawing through MoonPay, working with other tokens, is difficult and often ends in lost funds.
Gelobt: For an XLM wallet the interface is clean and clear, and Stellar blockchain transaction speed is high.
Für wen: XLM holders who do not plan to swap assets.
Platz 58. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 7.989 Bewertungen
38von 100
MEXC draws traders with a wide coin selection and no spot fees, but its risk-control system blocks withdrawals precisely for successful traders, turning an advantage into a trap. Regulatory issues and forced KYC make the platform unpredictable.
Gelobt: A massive selection of altcoins and high leverage attract traders who need access to low-liquidity coins.
Kritik: The risk-control mechanism triggers arbitrarily and blocks withdrawals with no avenue for appeal.
Für wen: Speculative traders willing to accept unpredictability in exchange for access to rare tokens.
Platz 59. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,2★ · 3.645 Bewertungen
38von 100
The platform onboards newcomers in Africa well with a clear interface, but systematically blocks withdrawals and leaves people locked out of accounts for years, which destroys trust in the product.
Gelobt: Easy signup and a clear interface for those buying crypto for the first time.
Kritik: Verification is not required for deposits but the system freezes and fails to complete checks for months when you withdraw.
Für wen: Beginner investors in Nigeria and South Africa.
Platz 60. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,2★ · 110.692 Bewertungen
35von 100
Binance.US is a stripped-down US version of global Binance, and you can feel it: transaction history is available for only 90 days, P&L must be calculated manually, the interface is confusing, and support can deactivate accounts without explanation. Low fees and reliable order execution are real advantages, but the product is technically rough.
Gelobt: Fees are among the lowest of any regulated US exchange.
Kritik: Trading history is cut to 90 days and there is no automatic profit and loss calculation.
Für wen: A trader who wants low fees and is willing to accept limited functionality.
Platz 61. Wert aus Rezensionen: 34 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 10.041 Bewertungen
34von 100
Plus500 offers a wide range of CFD instruments with fast withdrawals, but the mobile app slows down precisely during volatility, when it matters most, and execution failures during position closing turn profit into loss.
Gelobt: Regular traders note same-day withdrawals without bureaucracy.
Kritik: Charts and quotes lag during high volatility, making precise entry and exit from a position unreliable.
Für wen: CFD traders with small positions who do not depend on tick-level accuracy.
Platz 62. Wert aus Rezensionen: 34 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 5.507 Bewertungen
34von 100
MEW can hold ether and tokens, but breaks regularly after updates with white screens. A forced migration from a 5-word phrase to a 24-word phrase cut off longtime users from their funds. Gamification and spam take up more space than stability.
Gelobt: A reputation as a secure wallet for Ethereum veterans and a beginner-friendly interface.
Kritik: Migration to the new seed phrase format broke access for some users without warning.
Für wen: ETH holders willing to tolerate periodic breakdowns.
Platz 63. Wert aus Rezensionen: 33 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 25.962 Bewertungen
33von 100
A separate Webull crypto app with the most fundamental structural flaw: you cannot withdraw crypto to an external wallet, only sell and withdraw fiat. This eliminates the point of any long-term self-custody crypto strategy.
Gelobt: Fast trades without extra information for those already comfortable in the Webull ecosystem.
Kritik: Crypto assets cannot be transferred to your own wallet: only selling inside the app is possible.
Für wen: Existing Webull clients who want to add crypto to their brokerage account without self-custody.
Platz 64. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 109.188 Bewertungen
30von 100
Gemini combines a crypto exchange and a crypto cashback credit card, which is an interesting combination, but the app consistently fails to deliver: the card blocks without notification, in-app payment stops working for months, charts fail to load, and staking orders execute in the opposite direction to what was entered. The product idea is more interesting than the product itself.
Gelobt: A credit card with bitcoin cashback is a rare and genuinely useful mechanic.
Kritik: The credit card is regularly blocked for unclear reasons and restoring access through the app is impossible.
Für wen: Someone who wants to accumulate bitcoin through everyday card spending.
Platz 65. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 13.488 Bewertungen
30von 100
A cloud mining service that technically works, but profitability is wiped out by operating fees. Users who invested $400 in hashpower end up with less than if they had simply bought bitcoin for that amount.
Gelobt: A clear cloud mining mechanic with the ability to reinvest in hashpower directly from the app.
Kritik: Maintenance and electricity fees consume most of the income, especially for small investments.
Für wen: Those who want to participate in bitcoin mining without buying hardware and are prepared for a long payback period.
Platz 66. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 5.369 Bewertungen
30von 100
The exchange provides a broad trading toolkit, but verification often hits a dead end, points cannot be redeemed, and transferred funds periodically disappear from the balance. P2P also has scammers the platform does not filter out.
Gelobt: A user-friendly interface and wide selection of trading pairs for experienced traders.
Kritik: Multi-step verification on every login and unpredictable balance behavior undermine trust in the platform.
Für wen: Experienced traders in regions without access to top-tier exchanges.
Platz 67. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 3.794 Bewertungen
30von 100
Toobit has the functionality of a full exchange with trading tools, but several independent users describe the same pattern: stop-losses do not trigger and positions are liquidated at the right moment, which is a sign of price manipulation.
Gelobt: The set of trading tools and automation suits experienced traders who cannot watch the chart constantly.
Kritik: The advertised stop-loss mechanics and trading volume reward payouts do not work as described in the terms.
Für wen: Traders looking for a smaller alternative exchange with a wide token list.
Platz 68. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 2,9★ · 3.401 Bewertungen
30von 100
An exchange with a wide coin list including small altcoins, but users spend months unable to register because verification codes do not work, and some report being unable to withdraw funds for years.
Gelobt: A wide altcoin selection including coins unavailable on major exchanges.
Kritik: Account creation stalls at the verification step: codes do not work and the problem has persisted for weeks.
Für wen: Traders hunting low-liquidity altcoins at an early stage.
Platz 69. Wert aus Rezensionen: 29 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 7.452 Bewertungen
29von 100
Bitstamp is an exchange with a long history, but mobile app operational execution has failed: transfers freeze for months, accounts are blocked without explanation, and support does not respond. The trading interface with its tools works, but access to funds does not.
Gelobt: Trading tools and charts are better than most competitors and experienced traders value the depth of functionality.
Kritik: Support does not resolve frozen fund issues for weeks and months.
Für wen: Experienced traders who care about charts and orders more than withdrawal speed.
Platz 70. Wert aus Rezensionen: 29 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 2.439 Bewertungen
29von 100
Among real reviews, a systemic problem emerges: users report locked funds, inability to send Tron or Ripple, stolen tokens, and complete silence from support. The claimed decentralization contradicts mandatory email registration.
Gelobt: Convenient Telegram integration and minimal swap fees inside the app.
Kritik: Inability to withdraw certain coins and no support response when funds are locked.
Für wen: Not recommended to anyone given current reviews.
Platz 71. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 197.792 Bewertungen
28von 100
Trust Wallet is designed as a non-custodial wallet with full key control, which sounds good in theory, but in practice the app crashes during swaps, the balance sometimes fails to display after receiving BTC, and reinstallation requires re-entering the seed phrase every few months. The safety of the app itself raises questions: several users report missing assets.
Gelobt: Support for a wide number of networks and tokens in one non-custodial wallet.
Kritik: The app periodically stops working and requires reinstallation with seed phrase entry.
Für wen: A user who needs a non-custodial wallet for multiple blockchains.
Platz 72. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 41.335 Bewertungen
28von 100
CoinCap was once a convenient minimalist tracker, but the team stopped updating the app: the last update was several years ago, quotes lag, the watchlist does not scroll, and many coins are simply absent. It can no longer be used as a primary tracker.
Gelobt: When the app worked, it offered a clean portfolio chart as a single line over all time with no noise.
Kritik: The coin list has not been updated in years and most current tokens are simply missing from the database.
Für wen: Not recommended to anyone in its current state.
Platz 73. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,2★ · 28.313 Bewertungen
28von 100
An app for memecoin trading with an opaque coin discovery mechanic: new tokens appear in the listing days after launch when all the upside is already gone. Price alerts do not work and accounts are blocked without explanation for a year or more.
Gelobt: A simple entry into the world of memecoins for those who have never bought crypto before.
Kritik: Coins appear in the app days or weeks late, eliminating the point of early-stage trading.
Für wen: A memecoin speculator willing to accept high risk and opaque terms.
Platz 74. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 22.374 Bewertungen
28von 100
The exchange core works, but the withdrawal mechanism is systemically broken: users cannot link a bank for withdrawal even though the same bank is accepted for deposits. A basic platform function is unavailable to a significant portion of the audience.
Gelobt: Trading operations and account top-ups go through without problems.
Kritik: Withdrawals are blocked for most banks with no clear explanation.
Für wen: Experienced traders who do not plan to withdraw money to a card.
Platz 75. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 4.663 Bewertungen
28von 100
The app promises bitcoin for steps, but withdrawals of satoshis do not work for most users and some accounts have been drained without explanation. The product's value is destroyed at the reward redemption stage.
Gelobt: The idea of passively accumulating bitcoin by walking is appealing and keeps an audience engaged for years.
Kritik: The step-counting mechanic stops arbitrarily mid-day with no explanation.
Für wen: Bitcoin fans willing to tolerate instability for a passive income.
Platz 76. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 161.418 Bewertungen
22von 100
Base Wallet, formerly Coinbase Wallet, is going through a painful redesign: during the transition to the new version some users lost assets, EIP-7702 delegation blocks NFT transfers, Solana transactions fail, and support has not responded for months. The L2 wallet has potential but its current state is dangerous for real money.
Gelobt: Trading on the Base network runs fast and around the clock for those who had no migration issues.
Kritik: App updates have repeatedly led to loss of access to assets with no recovery path.
Für wen: A developer or experienced crypto user willing to take risks on a new L2 network.
Platz 77. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 33.510 Bewertungen
22von 100
The move-to-earn concept is interesting, but core mechanics are broken: accumulated tokens get stuck in the jar, the balance calculates incorrectly, and the earned crypto asset effectively cannot be withdrawn. The product does not deliver on its main promise.
Gelobt: The idea of linking physical activity to a real reward genuinely motivates some users to walk more.
Kritik: Tokens disappear into the jar and cannot be withdrawn even after the growth period ends.
Für wen: A fitness enthusiast who values the motivation process itself more than actual income.
Platz 78. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 21.392 Bewertungen
22von 100
The wallet is positioned as non-custodial, but users are widely reporting frozen funds and unauthorized transfers after using the DApp browser. Losing access to an account with no support response turns asset storage into a lottery.
Gelobt: The interface is simple and clear for a newcomer, and trading fees on Cronos EVM are low.
Kritik: After interacting with DApps, funds disappear and customer support does not respond.
Für wen: Those who want to try Web3 with a minimal amount and accept the risks.
Platz 79. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 8.943 Bewertungen
22von 100
MoonPay exists as a payment gateway for buying crypto but is unreliable: money is charged and crypto does not reach the wallet, conversions lose funds without a trace in history, and support is automated and useless.
Gelobt: When a transaction goes through correctly, the crediting speed is faster than a bank transfer.
Kritik: Purchased assets regularly do not arrive in the user's wallet and support cannot trace the transaction.
Für wen: Users of embedded MoonPay payments in another service with no choice.
Platz 80. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 6.344 Bewertungen
22von 100
Coinme offers a unique niche: buying crypto with cash at a supermarket through a Coinstar terminal. But execution is unreliable: coins do not get credited, accounts are blocked right after registration, and customer service runs only through a bot. The concept is interesting but the product is rough.
Gelobt: The ability to buy crypto with cash at an ordinary supermarket without a bank card is a unique scenario for the unbanked.
Kritik: Purchased coins regularly do not get credited to the account and support cannot fix it.
Für wen: Those who want to buy crypto with cash and have no access to online exchanges.
Platz 81. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 5.118 Bewertungen
22von 100
BTCC draws newcomers with generous bonuses that turn out to be useless coupons, and several users point out this discrepancy directly. User funds periodically disappear, copy trading eats profits with fees, and the app closes on its own.
Gelobt: Educational materials and a demo mode help newcomers understand the basics of crypto trading.
Kritik: Advertised bonuses are trading coupons with no real value, which erodes trust in the platform.
Platz 82. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 3.886 Bewertungen
22von 100
Best Wallet is positioned as a Web3 wallet with presales, but systemic complaints about being unable to withdraw assets and losing access to funds make it an unreliable tool for holding real value.
Gelobt: Access to presale tokens unavailable on regular exchanges attracts an early investor audience.
Kritik: Some users have been unable to withdraw assets for months, destroying the core property of any wallet which is control over your own funds.
Für wen: Crypto presale participants willing to accept elevated risk.
Platz 83. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 2.750 Bewertungen
22von 100
Several independent users from different countries describe the same pattern: verification passed, coins purchased, then the account is blocked without explanation and funds are not returned. Low fees do not compensate for the high risk of losing funds.
Gelobt: A clean interface, genuinely low trading fees, and a wide range of coins on spot and futures.
Kritik: Withdrawals are blocked for vague risk-control reasons with no appeal and waits of up to 30 days.
Für wen: Not recommended to anyone in its current state.
Platz 84. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 98.193 Bewertungen
18von 100
The app is positioned as trading education, but the real content boils down to common knowledge you can find on Wikipedia. The core problem is not money but that the product as such does not exist: after registration users cannot log into their account.
Gelobt: A visually appealing onboarding gives a sense of an easy start in the first few minutes.
Kritik: The educational content is shallow enough that the app offers nothing not found in any free article.
Platz 85. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 5.513 Bewertungen
18von 100
The wallet fails at the basic job: users widely report being unable to withdraw XRP, blocked funds, and a compromised cold wallet. The app is not authorized by Ripple yet positions itself as an XRP wallet, which is a warning sign in itself.
Gelobt: Customer support sometimes helps recover account access by email.
Kritik: Withdrawals and transfers work unreliably or not at all.
Für wen: Cautious experimenters with a zero balance.
Platz 86. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 4.312 Bewertungen
18von 100
Metal Pay fails the basic reliability test: the app does not open for a significant portion of users, account verification freezes, and support is unreachable. The core function of a crypto payment platform is inaccessible to many.
Gelobt: The XPR token attracts its own audience as a niche asset unavailable on major exchanges.
Kritik: The app freezes on the loading screen and will not let users through, making all other functionality unreachable.
Für wen: XPR token holders who have no alternative.
Platz 87. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 2.865 Bewertungen
18von 100
A crypto purchase service with systemic verification problems: money is charged before the check is completed, transactions are then declined, and refunds drag on for days with no coherent support.
Gelobt: In the rare cases where transactions work, the process is fast and requires no extra steps.
Kritik: The system charges the card before verifying identity and then blocks the transaction after charging, without immediately returning the funds.
Platz 88. Wert aus Rezensionen: 12 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 14.110 Bewertungen
12von 100
The app mines very slowly but withdrawal thresholds are set so high that cashing out is practically impossible. Users with real calculations show that a $300 yearly subscription yields $14 to $33 in returns.
Gelobt: The accumulation mechanic through watching ads runs stably and requires no investment to start.
Kritik: Hashrate earned by watching ads is systematically reduced over time and the withdrawal threshold makes earnings practically out of reach.
Für wen: Those who want to understand how mining works without real investment.
Platz 89. Wert aus Rezensionen: 12 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 12.178 Bewertungen
12von 100
BRD has effectively ceased to exist as an independent product: new users cannot use it and existing users must migrate to Coinbase Wallet. There is no point in downloading it.
Gelobt: In the past it stood out for simplicity and clear private key management without unnecessary complexity.
Kritik: The app is non-functional for new users and leads only to a migration page.
Für wen: No one except those restoring an old wallet.
Platz 90. Wert aus Rezensionen: 12 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 5.319 Bewertungen
12von 100
Anchor has accumulated a critical mass of complaints about blocked withdrawals and a failed banking partner for months: users cannot deposit or withdraw. Limit orders do not execute on time and support responds with automated messages.
Gelobt: A debit card and simple interface are liked by a small number of long-term users.
Kritik: The banking integration has been broken for many months, blocking both deposits and withdrawals.
Für wen: No one at the current stage of platform operation.
Platz 91. Wert aus Rezensionen: 10 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 4.830 Bewertungen
10von 100
Reviews give no way to establish what this product is: users ask basic questions about whether they can withdraw money at all, and several report vanished portfolios and account takeovers. No real value proposition can be traced.
Gelobt: Newcomers like that the interface is not overloaded with information.
Kritik: The withdrawal mechanic is opaque or inaccessible to most users.
Für wen: Impossible to determine at the current level of transparency.
Platz 92. Wert aus Rezensionen: 8 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 15.622 Bewertungen
8von 100
No real educational product is visible in the reviews at all. Substantive reviews are almost nonexistent, and the few that make sense describe intrusive ads and the inability to withdraw simulated funds.
Gelobt: The app looks like a trading simulator without real risk.
Kritik: Simulated earnings cannot be withdrawn and ads block the interface.
Für wen: Curious newcomers who want a gamified trading simulation.
Platz 93. Wert aus Rezensionen: 8 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 13.432 Bewertungen
8von 100
The app offers pseudo-mining through ads: the balance grows and then resets without explanation, and withdrawal is blocked until an unreachable threshold is met. The mechanic keeps users around for ad impressions, not real income.
Gelobt: A few users report a successful withdrawal via Lightning Network in a couple of seconds.
Kritik: The accumulated balance resets or freezes arbitrarily, making any long-term participation pointless.
Für wen: The curious who are willing to watch ads without expecting real earnings.
Zu den Bewertungen
Zwei Bewertungen — zwei Quellen
Sie helfen beim Vergleich von Apps, ersetzen aber nicht die Prüfung der eigenen Aufgabe.
Rezensionsbewertung · bis 100
Die gespeicherte Bewertung aus der inApp-Recherche zu den Rezensionstexten. Sie beurteilt die App im Archiv insgesamt, nicht die Zuverlässigkeit einer einzelnen Funktion.
Store-Bewertung · bis 5
Die Bewertung von der App-Seite zum Zeitpunkt der Datenerhebung. Aktuelle Bewertung und Version können abweichen.
In der archivierten Stichprobe dieses Themas: 93 Apps und 25.922 gelesene Rezensionen. Das ist der Gesamtumfang der Recherche, nicht die Zahl der Rezensionen pro App.
Ein Abstand zwischen den Bewertungen beweist keine Manipulation. Das Datum der Berechnung und die vollständige Methodik der Bewertung sind nicht im mobilen Archiv. Vergleich die Aufgabenbeschreibungen und die Originalzitate und prüf die Bedingungen in der aktuellen Version.
