Wert aus Rezensionen: 85 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 2.802 Bewertungen
85von 100
The most feature-rich manual tracker in the lineup: multiple accounts, subcategories, budgets, detailed charts, a web viewer for desktop, and a one-time purchase. No bank connection. that is a deliberate developer choice. Users with 3-5 years of experience call it the best app on their phone.
Gelobt
Deep customization without sacrificing entry speed. Built-in charts by category, account, and period give a complete picture of finances without bank access. Data is kept for years without loss.
Kritik
No split transactions (splitting a purchase across two categories is not possible). No real-time cross-device sync. Recurring transactions sometimes do not show in the calendar.
Für wen: Disciplined users who prefer full control through manual entry and are not willing to grant bank access to third-party apps.
Wert aus Rezensionen: 82 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 4.841 Bewertungen
82von 100
A minimalist daily budget planner: you enter income, fixed expenses, and a savings goal, and the app divides the remainder across the days of the month, showing how much you can spend today. No bank connection required. Radically simple, but that is exactly why most users finally stick to a budget after years of failing with other apps.
Gelobt
The live 'available today' figure changes spending psychology: not 'how much is left this month' but 'how much do I have right now.' Users with ADHD and financial anxiety specifically highlight this mechanic.
Kritik
No balance forecast for future dates. Variable income (freelance, shift work) fits the model poorly. No balance carryover between months.
Für wen: People with a fixed income who tend to spend everything at the start of the month and want a simple guide for 'how much can I spend today.'
Wert aus Rezensionen: 81 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 554 Bewertungen
81von 100
A daily-balance budgeter: enter your income and fixed expenses, and the app splits the free money across days to show how much you can spend today. Works especially well for people prone to impulse spending.
Gelobt
A single 'how much is left today' figure gives instant clarity on your financial state. Multi-budget support. Apple Watch widget. One-time purchase.
Kritik
Recent updates broke the savings-goal logic. No data import from other apps. Initial setup takes considerable effort.
Für wen: Anyone who wants to stay within a monthly budget without dealing with categories, especially people prone to impulse spending or those with attention-deficit disorder who need one simple number.
Platz 4. Wert aus Rezensionen: 80 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 2.326 Bewertungen
80von 100
One of the most honest manual expense registers on the market. A solo developer has maintained the app for years, responds to user requests, and iCloud sync works reliably. No automatic bank connection, but most users see that as a feature.
Gelobt: Scheduled transactions provide a running balance forecast for any future date. Sync across iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Apple Watch via iCloud is stable. An active developer who responds personally and quickly.
Kritik: No automatic bank transaction import. everything is entered manually. The iOS version has fewer features than the macOS version. Some duplicate transactions have appeared after updates.
Für wen: People who do not want to give the app bank access and are happy to enter expenses manually, but expect reliable sync across Apple devices and a balance forecast.
Platz 5. Wert aus Rezensionen: 79 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 19.219 Bewertungen
79von 100
Spending Tracker does one thing: manual entry of every expense with an instant balance update. The act of conscious entry is itself the mechanism for spending awareness. No bank sync, so no anxiety about data privacy.
Gelobt: Manually entering every expense creates real spending awareness: many users understand for the first time in years where their money goes. No account link required: full control and data privacy. Weekly and monthly budgets with color-coded overspending indicators work without any setup.
Kritik: Multi-device sync via Dropbox is unstable and requires manual file management. No automatic bank transaction import: everything is manual, which becomes tedious with a high transaction volume. Budget categories cannot be capped by amount within a period.
Für wen: Anyone who wants to understand their spending through conscious manual tracking and is not willing to give the app access to their bank account. Especially suited for those who have tried sync and been let down.
Platz 6. Wert aus Rezensionen: 79 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 12.110 Bewertungen
79von 100
A simple budget planner with a pleasant design. Works without a bank connection, which privacy-conscious users appreciate. Manual entry builds genuine spending awareness. No shared multi-account budget for couples and no balance forecast.
Gelobt: A clean, aesthetic interface reduces financial anxiety. The support team is responsive and handles real user issues. Data stays on the device without a bank link.
Kritik: No shared mode for couples with separate accounts. Setting up multiple income sources with different deposit dates is cumbersome. No end-of-period balance forecast.
Für wen: Budgeting beginners, people with financial anxiety, students, and young parents who value simplicity and visual appeal without complex setup.
Platz 7. Wert aus Rezensionen: 79 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.755 Bewertungen
79von 100
A sheet-based expense tracker closer to a personal spreadsheet than a bank manager. iCloud sync is stable. The developer responds to issues quickly. No bank integration: manual entry only.
Gelobt: A sheet structure lets you separate trips, months, and projects without confusion. iCloud sync across iPhone, iPad, and Mac is reliable. One-time purchase.
Kritik: No balance forecast or scheduled transactions. No splitting a transaction across multiple categories. No way to export a single sheet: only the full archive.
Für wen: People used to spreadsheets who want a mobile replacement for Google Sheets without bank integration but with solid shared access via iCloud.
Platz 8. Wert aus Rezensionen: 78 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 3.668 Bewertungen
78von 100
A charming manual expense tracker with customizable icons, multiple accounts, and clear charts. Deliberately avoids bank connections. Works like a visual digital notebook.
Gelobt: The cute design with custom icons lowers the barrier to daily expense entry. Users note it is the first app they open every day with genuine pleasure.
Kritik: No cross-device sync: if you lose your phone, your entire history is gone. No balance forecast. Category hierarchy behaves unpredictably in reports.
Für wen: Young people and students who keep a manual spending log without bank integration and care about visual appeal.
Platz 9. Wert aus Rezensionen: 76 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 18.323 Bewertungen
76von 100
Money Manager is a full double-entry accounting tracker with multiple accounts, currencies, and visualizations. No bank sync. everything is manual. It is the most feature-rich manual tracker in the category and one of the most reliable.
Gelobt: Managing multiple accounts in one app with transfers between them gives a complete picture of personal finances. Multi-currency tracking with conversion works correctly. Visual category reports for any period show spending trends.
Kritik: No convenient shared access for a couple or family without handing over one device. Syncing between iPhone and Android is not possible, which creates problems when switching platforms. Double-entry logic is confusing for newcomers without a finance background.
Für wen: People who want detailed manual tracking of all finances without sending data to the cloud. Ideal for those managing multiple accounts in different currencies.
Platz 10. Wert aus Rezensionen: 76 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 3.620 Bewertungen
76von 100
A budgeter that splits monthly income into weeks, accounting for bill due dates. The core idea: not 'how much is left this month' but 'how much is safe to spend this week.' Supports bank sync. Users call it the best they have tried after Mint, YNAB, and EveryDollar.
Gelobt: The weekly 'safe to spend' figure changes behavior: users stop blowing everything at the start of the month. Simple, without overwhelming detail.
Kritik: Bank sync broke in 2023 and remains unstable. The weekly balance calculation breaks when several large bills fall in the same week. Budget sharing with a partner is limited.
Für wen: People who think about money weekly and find monthly budgets unhelpful because they tend to overspend in the first days after payday.
Platz 11. Wert aus Rezensionen: 76 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.810 Bewertungen
76von 100
An extremely simple manual tracker: add a line item, enter an amount, check the balance. No bank sync, no automation: only what you enter yourself. This makes it a reliable mindfulness tool for people with irregular income.
Gelobt: One screen, ten seconds per entry. Complete freedom to create categories for any scenario. No forced bank link: data stays on the device.
Kritik: No balance forecast or scheduled transactions. The free version limits the number of records. No cross-device sync.
Für wen: People with irregular income, students, and those who want to keep a manual cash log without any bank connections.
Platz 12. Wert aus Rezensionen: 76 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 762 Bewertungen
76von 100
A long-standing manual tracker with multiple accounts, categories, reports, and receipt photos. Users have relied on it for years and praise the fast entry speed. The main pain point: transferring a license when switching phones or platforms often fails.
Gelobt: Fast expense entry with categories and photos. Full period reports. Cloud data backup when set up correctly.
Kritik: The license does not transfer automatically when switching devices or platforms. The iPhone version has fewer features than the Android version. After a system update, editing transactions stopped working.
Für wen: Those who manage personal or family finances manually and want a reliable tool without monthly fees, provided they are willing to sort out the license transfer.
Platz 13. Wert aus Rezensionen: 74 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 7.376 Bewertungen
74von 100
A light and fast expense tracker with a clear interface. Operates entirely in manual mode without a bank connection. Users report years of stable use.
Gelobt: Instant transaction entry in two or three taps. Support for multiple accounts and currencies. Simple category reports for any period. Works offline.
Kritik: Pop-up banners on app launch interfere with quick entry. A few users report unexplained balance changes without new transactions. Exporting to spreadsheets is less convenient than desired.
Für wen: Those who want to log every expense on their phone in seconds each day, without bank sync and without complex budget categories.
Platz 14. Wert aus Rezensionen: 74 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 4.934 Bewertungen
74von 100
A mature business expense tracker with deep template customization, multi-currency support, and receipt photos. One-time purchase. Valued for developer responsiveness and a stable database going back to 2010. Tailored for travel expense reports.
Gelobt: Users have kept data intact since 2010 without loss. The developer creates custom templates on request and replies to emails personally. Fast entry of multi-currency expenses.
Kritik: Automatic mileage tracking occasionally misses entire days. The interface feels cluttered under fast entry conditions. Pop-up review requests appear too frequently.
Für wen: Freelancers, sole traders, and business travelers who need detailed expense tracking for tax purposes or employer reimbursement.
Platz 15. Wert aus Rezensionen: 73 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 841 Bewertungen
73von 100
A manual multi-account tracker with categories, charts, and cloud sync. No bank link required. Valued for fast entry and clear reporting. The app has generally been stable for years.
Gelobt: Tracking multiple accounts without a bank link, fast entry, clear category analytics with monthly charts. Stable cross-device sync.
Kritik: After some iOS updates the balance resets to zero or transactions fail to save. Recurring transactions occasionally cause issues. No end-of-month balance forecast.
Für wen: Those who want to manage multiple wallets or accounts manually and see clear analytics without a subscription and without giving bank access.
Platz 16. Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 14.923 Bewertungen
72von 100
A manual budgeting app with deep category customization and an honest approach: money only appears when you enter it yourself. Users willing to enter data manually tend to stay for years.
Gelobt: Flexible categories and subcategories, a calendar view of expenses, and the ability to work without a bank connection. Users appreciate full control over budget structure without automation.
Kritik: No display of the current account balance next to each transaction. Cross-device sync is unstable. Period and rollover settings are contradictory and confusing for new users.
Für wen: People who want to consciously control every expense through manual entry, without handing bank access to a third-party service.
Platz 17. Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 4.731 Bewertungen
72von 100
A concise expense tracker without a bank connection: create categories, enter amounts manually, view a pie chart. Its strength is absolute simplicity of onboarding and fast transaction entry.
Gelobt: Instant transaction entry in a few taps and a clear pie chart that immediately shows where money goes. No bank connection: data stays on the device.
Kritik: No history broken down by individual months, only the full year. No balance planning or forecast. No recurring transactions. Viewing past periods is cumbersome.
Für wen: Those who need the simplest possible expense log without extra features, without accounts, and without bank integration.
Platz 18. Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 1.798 Bewertungen
72von 100
A minimalist envelope-style budget tracker: set a limit for a period, subtract expenses manually, see the balance. Supports weekly and biweekly periods, which is uncommon. No bank sync and no future balance forecast.
Gelobt: One glance at the screen shows how much is left today and for the month. Arbitrary budget periods to match any pay schedule. Clean design.
Kritik: No balance forecast for future dates. Occasional freezes when adding records. The balance carryover feature was changed without notice in one update.
Für wen: People who need simple weekly or biweekly spending control without tracking their entire financial life.
Platz 19. Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 703 Bewertungen
72von 100
A clean minimalist tracker with multiple accounts, grouping, recurring payments, and instant sync. No bank link. Works well as a personal ledger. The developer is active and responds to requests. Limitations: recurring settings sometimes fail to sync across devices and there is no way to split a single transaction across multiple categories.
Gelobt: Instant cross-device sync. Account grouping. A scheduled future payments view lets you see a balance forecast. Beautiful, uncluttered interface.
Kritik: Recurring payments do not always sync across devices. No splitting a single purchase across categories. The date picker wheel occasionally shows the wrong day. Data import is available in spreadsheet format only.
Für wen: Those who want a tidy personal ledger with multiple accounts and sync, without handing bank access to third-party services.
Platz 20. Wert aus Rezensionen: 71 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.692 Bewertungen
71von 100
The simplest possible budget list: lines with plus or minus, a running total at the top. The minimalist concept is executed well and uncluttered. The transition from Fudget 1 to Fudget 2 left some users with lost data.
Gelobt: Fast entry of any income or expense line without mandatory categories. Support for multiple budgets at the same time. The developer communicates openly with users.
Kritik: Data from Fudget 1 did not migrate for some users when upgrading to version 2. No balance forecast for future dates. No sync with banks or other data sources.
Für wen: People who need a simple 'income minus expenses' list without automation. like a paper notepad on their phone.
Platz 21. Wert aus Rezensionen: 70 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 20.868 Bewertungen
70von 100
Hurdlr combines mileage, income, expenses, and automatic quarterly tax estimates. For the self-employed and small business owners it is a genuine financial control tool. Support responds with a real person. Mileage auto-tracking occasionally fails after updates.
Gelobt: The estimated tax calculation updates as income and expenses come in. A profit-and-loss report generates at the tap of a button and is suitable for an accountant. Support responds quickly and resolves real problems.
Kritik: After some updates, mileage auto-tracking begins recording mid-trip rather than from the start, understating the deductible mileage. The profit report requires understanding accounting methodology. The language is not obvious for beginners. The free tier is too limited for regular use.
Für wen: Freelancers, self-employed individuals, and micro-business owners on 1099 who need unified mileage, expense, and tax tracking without hiring an accountant.
Platz 22. Wert aus Rezensionen: 70 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 832 Bewertungen
70von 100
A minimalist expense-only tracker: no budgets, no bank link, no required income entry. Entry works like a calculator: amount, category, tags. Gives a monthly category breakdown with a pie chart. Not suitable for those who need a balance forecast or account balance.
Gelobt: Instant expense entry in two or three taps. You can start without any setup. Category analytics give a clear picture of where money goes.
Kritik: No running balance or forecast: only the total spent is visible. You cannot split a single purchase across multiple categories. After one update the location tag disappeared and some users' data shifted back by a day.
Für wen: Those who need only expense tracking without anything extra, especially those who avoid linking bank data to third-party services.
Platz 23. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 35.875 Bewertungen
68von 100
SimplyWise handles a narrow task well: scanning, storing, and organizing receipts for taxes or returns. OCR is accurate, the folder structure is flexible, and years of history are not lost. This is not a budget tracker. there are no expense categories or forecast. but for documenting expenses it is reliable.
Gelobt: Receipt recognition from a photo works accurately even in poor lighting. Folder storage and fast search let you find a receipt among hundreds in seconds. Years of history are preserved without loss, which matters for tax audits.
Kritik: Line-item amounts on receipts are sometimes misread and require manual verification. Importing e-receipts via email forwarding is unreliable. The desktop version displays scans at reduced resolution, unsuitable for official use.
Für wen: Freelancers, small business owners, and anyone storing receipts for tax deductions or refunds. Not a replacement for a budget tracker.
Platz 24. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 13.303 Bewertungen
68von 100
A digital version of the envelope budgeting method. Works without a bank connection: envelopes are funded manually and expenses are deducted from the relevant envelope. Works especially well for couples: both partners see the shared budget.
Gelobt: The envelope system makes money allocation tangible. Partner sync works reliably. History is stored without limits.
Kritik: No breakdown by bill due date: it is unclear whether funds will stretch until the next payday. Analytics and reports are very basic. The interface is confusing in places: an empty envelope and a depleted one look identical.
Für wen: Devotees of the envelope method and the Dave Ramsey system, couples with a shared budget, and those who firmly do not want to connect a bank to a third-party app.
Platz 25. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 1.668 Bewertungen
68von 100
An envelope app: each expense type gets its own account, entry is manual, and there is no bank link. Simple and reliable concept. Limited reports and no balance forecast make planning beyond a single month difficult.
Gelobt: Multiple independent envelope accounts with running balances. No intrusive banners. Simple spreadsheet export.
Kritik: No balance forecast for future dates. Categories cannot be renamed after creation. Reports do not allow selecting a specific period or category for export.
Für wen: Envelope method advocates who want to track multiple wallets or savings goals manually without bank integration.
Platz 26. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 817 Bewertungen
68von 100
A voice-entry tracker: dictate 'coffee three dollars fifty', and the app transcribes and categorizes it. Apple Pay integration automates expense capture. Simple interface without overload. A young product with an active developer. Weak points are sync reliability and data loss. some users lost an entire month of data and voice entry occasionally freezes.
Gelobt: Voice expense entry in seconds. Automatic Apple Pay transaction capture via Shortcut. Beautiful, simple interface.
Kritik: Sync hangs and does not respond to taps. Apple Pay occasionally deletes a full month of data with no recovery option. Voice entry freezes at the end of a phrase. No budget planning or balance forecast.
Für wen: Those who do not want to type anything and are willing to trust voice or contactless payment for expense capture, provided they do not keep years of history.
Platz 27. Wert aus Rezensionen: 67 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 6.188 Bewertungen
67von 100
The best tool for splitting group expenses. Works without registration, without intrusive banners in the free tier, and without transaction limits. A few users found calculation errors in complex scenarios.
Gelobt: Simple expense and participant entry without registration. Automatic calculation of who owes whom how much. Works for international trips with multiple currencies.
Kritik: Calculation errors in non-standard splitting scenarios have been documented by users. Updating the app mid-trip once caused all data to be lost. No archive of past trips without active storage.
Für wen: Friends and travelers who need to quickly split group expenses without registration during a trip or shared event.
Platz 28. Wert aus Rezensionen: 66 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 96.701 Bewertungen
66von 100
Monarch is one of the few tools where everything works together: multi-bank account sync, category budgets, net worth tracking, and shared access for couples. Users genuinely change their financial behavior. The main weakness: account sync via Plaid sometimes breaks and requires manual intervention.
Gelobt: A single screen with all accounts, loans, and investments gives a real picture of net worth. The category budget with a running monthly total is accurate and updates without delay. Shared access for couples without complex setup. a rare feature among competitors.
Kritik: Bank sync via Plaid periodically breaks, and several days of transactions disappear or duplicate without warning. Auto-categorization makes mistakes and requires constant manual correction. The mobile app lags behind the web version in features. Some operations are only available on desktop.
Für wen: Couples and families who want to manage a shared budget and see a complete picture of all accounts in one place. Best for those willing to invest time in initial setup.
Platz 29. Wert aus Rezensionen: 65 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 769 Bewertungen
65von 100
A digital take on envelope budgeting: create category envelopes, fund them, and log expenses. No bank access required. Works locally. Key limitations are no cross-device sync and no automatic envelope refills.
Gelobt: Simple envelope mechanics without extra screens. Color coding is clear at a glance. One-time purchase.
Kritik: No sync between iPhone and Mac or a second device. No automatic envelope funding at the start of the month. Individual envelopes cannot be renamed or deleted.
Für wen: Those who want to run an envelope budget on a single device without a bank link, primarily individuals rather than couples.
Platz 30. Wert aus Rezensionen: 63 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 29.610 Bewertungen
63von 100
Copilot is technically the most sophisticated personal finance tracker: beautiful interface, smart learning-based categorization, and a clear transaction history. Users genuinely change their behavior.
Gelobt: Smart categorization learns over time and starts getting things right without manual corrections. The spending view by month, week, and category is intuitive. Developers actively engage with users and ship updates with real fixes.
Kritik: Plaid sync periodically breaks and duplicates transactions. Recovery requires manual work. Investment accounts are displayed with limited detail. After switching devices, some users lost their accumulated transaction history.
Für wen: People who want a detailed understanding of their spending and are willing to pay for a beautiful, intelligent tool. Best suited for those whose main accounts are at supported banks.
Platz 31. Wert aus Rezensionen: 63 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 3.518 Bewertungen
63von 100
A finance aggregator with an AI assistant: connects accounts, investments, and credit cards, builds a net-worth summary, and lets you ask questions in chat. Stronger than competitors at investment tracking and long-term planning. Weaker with multiple users and complex transactions.
Gelobt: The AI chat answers questions based on the user's real data ('why did my spending go up in March?'). Investment and net-worth tracking in a single interface.
Kritik: With multiple accounts at different banks, the connection periodically breaks. The AI can miss an income source when setting up a budget. Bugs appear when creating categories during import.
Für wen: Users with multiple accounts and investment portfolios who want a high-level financial overview, not just expense tracking.
Platz 32. Wert aus Rezensionen: 63 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 1.586 Bewertungen
63von 100
A visual expense tracker with a drag-and-drop mechanic for moving money between 'sources' and 'categories.' Intuitive at first glance. Sync is unstable for some users, and migrating to a new version stripped some users of paid features without compensation.
Gelobt: The drag-and-drop mechanic of moving a transaction from an income source to a spending category makes accounting more visual. Multi-currency support. A beautiful and distinctive interface.
Kritik: Cross-device sync hangs and requires re-login. Migration to the new version voided paid features for some users without compensation. The app has accumulated unnecessary interface elements in recent versions.
Für wen: Users who think about money visually and want to see the flow of funds between accounts and categories in a drag-and-drop format.
Platz 33. Wert aus Rezensionen: 63 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 635 Bewertungen
63von 100
A long-running app with a clean interface for daily expense tracking. Fast entry with autocomplete from history. No bank link. A major redesign left some users without the familiar interface they relied on.
Gelobt: Minimalist, attractive interface with fast autocomplete entry. Good daily and monthly expense analytics.
Kritik: The redesign significantly degraded navigation and removed quick access to familiar features. No multi-currency support. No account balance or balance forecast.
Für wen: Those who want a clean, fast expense diary without asset analytics. Not suitable for managing multiple accounts.
Platz 34. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 2.358 Bewertungen
62von 100
A tool for small businesses and freelancers: scan receipts and generate expense reports. OCR quality is uneven. Not intended for personal household budget management.
Gelobt: Real support from a live person who answers questions. The ability to manage multiple projects in separate reports. No bank sync required.
Kritik: OCR confuses the total with a discount amount or reads the wrong store name. No way to stitch a long receipt from multiple photos. The app immediately asks for extended access without a real trial period.
Für wen: Freelancers and micro-business owners who need to consolidate paper receipts into a single report for an accountant or tax authority.
Platz 35. Wert aus Rezensionen: 61 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 6.531 Bewertungen
61von 100
One of the fastest manual expense entry tools: a pie-chart category wheel and three taps to record a transaction. No bank sync. a deliberate choice that part of the audience values.
Gelobt: Lightning-fast entry via the category pie chart. A clear spending distribution for any period. Support for multiple accounts and currencies. Works offline.
Kritik: No upcoming payment reminders or balance forecast. History can reset on Android if app data is cleared. The free version has intrusive banners on every launch.
Für wen: People who prioritize fast expense entry and a visual spending breakdown by category, and who are willing to pay to remove ads.
Platz 36. Wert aus Rezensionen: 61 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 3.628 Bewertungen
61von 100
A manual tracker with a calendar view that shows income and expenses by day. Icon customization, multiple accounts, basic charts. No bank sync. The main issue: recurring transactions are unreliable and do not carry over to future months automatically.
Gelobt: The calendar display of daily income and expenses gives an intuitive balance forecast for the weeks ahead.
Kritik: Recurring transactions do not carry over to the next month automatically. No forward balance forecast. The account balance occasionally changes on its own. No desktop backup.
Für wen: Those who want to see their finances in calendar format and do not mind entering every transaction manually.
Platz 37. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 83.854 Bewertungen
60von 100
EveryDollar embodies zero-based budgeting: every dollar is manually assigned to a category before being spent. Manual control creates real spending awareness. Bank sync is unreliable and requires constant manual reconciliation.
Gelobt: The every-dollar-has-a-job method is disciplining: users see for the first time in years where money goes and consciously assign it to categories. The simple interface makes daily transaction entry fast.
Kritik: Bank sync regularly fails: transactions land in the wrong month or fail to pull in at all. Splitting a single transaction across multiple categories has bugs. The app requires too-frequent updates that interrupt daily use.
Für wen: Ramsey Method followers and anyone who wants strict manual control over every dollar. Not suitable for those used to automatic sync without manual effort.
Platz 38. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.782 Bewertungen
60von 100
One of the most flexible budget trackers for multi-currency use and custom periods. A strong choice for travelers and expats. Bank sync is unstable and sometimes accumulates duplicate entries.
Gelobt: Best multi-currency support with simultaneous conversion. Flexible budget periods for any pay cycle. A pleasing interface with customizable tags.
Kritik: Bank sync accumulates duplicate entries that must be deleted manually. Login on launch slows transaction entry on the go. The interface became more complex after a rebrand.
Für wen: Travelers and expats working with multiple currencies who are willing to accept unreliable bank sync.
Platz 39. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 893 Bewertungen
60von 100
A specialized mileage log for sole traders and business travel: manual entry or GPS tracking, spreadsheet export, route and trip-purpose memory. Not a personal budget tracker. Data lives on the device only: switching phones means losing all history if you have not exported first.
Gelobt: Fast trip entry with remembered addresses and purposes. Detailed export for accounting and tax purposes. A solo developer who responds to requests quickly.
Kritik: History is permanently lost when switching phones. There is no cloud backup. Mileage rates do not update automatically with annual IRS norm changes. GPS tracking stops during incoming calls.
Für wen: Self-employed individuals and those who deduct business travel: a simple trip log for tax purposes without extra features.
Platz 40. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 4.322.598 Bewertungen
58von 100
The Amex app is one of the best card interfaces on the market: payment in a couple of taps, instant notifications, and a clear spending view by card category. But it is a card management tool, not a budget: no overall spending picture or forecast of funds until payday.
Gelobt: Instant notification of every transaction with the amount and merchant. A clear overview of balance, available credit limit, and upcoming payment on the home screen. Convenient history browsing with category filters.
Kritik: No balance forecast or overall budget planning. Cannot track external bank accounts alongside Amex. Arbitrary card blocks and limit reductions without warning undermine trust in the tool even among long-term cardholders.
Für wen: Amex cardholders who need to monitor spending on that card specifically. Not suitable for budget seekers who want a complete financial picture.
Platz 41. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 2.511 Bewertungen
58von 100
A specialized service for travel expense reports: photograph a receipt and within a day receive an Excel file with extracted data. Suitable for corporate expense reimbursement. Not suitable as a personal finance tracker: no budgets, no analytics, no instant result. OCR quality has degraded for some users.
Gelobt: A ready Excel travel report without manual entry saves several hours a month for frequent business travelers.
Kritik: The result arrives after 24 hours with no instant preview. OCR is unreliable for multi-page and complex receipts. Support does not respond to emails. No spending analytics.
Für wen: Corporate professionals who travel regularly and need a report for accounting, not personal financial control.
Platz 42. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 1.252 Bewertungen
58von 100
A full-featured home accounting app: multiple accounts, category budgets, bill reminders, and family sync. Users who master it tend to stay for years. But family sync via a proprietary server is unreliable: transactions are lost or delayed by several days, which undermines the core shared-budget feature.
Gelobt: Detailed budget control by subcategory, a visual payment calendar, bill reminders, and multiple accounts in one place.
Kritik: Cross-device sync frequently fails or loses transactions. History cannot be recovered after a phone reset without a manual backup. The interface is dated and documentation has not been updated in years.
Für wen: People willing to invest time in setting up and maintaining full home accounting manually, while accepting unreliable family sync.
Platz 43. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 92.710 Bewertungen
55von 100
Stride covers three self-employment needs: mileage, expenses, and estimated tax. It used to be reliable. Some users now experience missed trips and data loss after updates, which is critical for tax documentation.
Gelobt: Automatic background mileage tracking without manual start. Quarterly tax estimates based on current data help avoid surprises. Expenses and work locations in one app with PDF export.
Kritik: Recent updates have caused the app to miss trips or fail to close routes correctly: data is lost with no recovery option. Transaction history sometimes stops syncing without warning. Intrusive third-party service offers inside the interface disrupt the workflow.
Für wen: Couriers, freelancers, and self-employed individuals on 1099 who need a free mileage and expense tracker for tax deductions.
Platz 44. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 2.237 Bewertungen
55von 100
A mature expense tracker supporting multiple currencies, wallets, budgets, and custom categories. Works without a bank connection. Cross-device sync periodically loses transactions, and several updates have wiped data entirely.
Gelobt: Flexible icons and categories make expense entry enjoyable. Period and wallet reports give a real picture of spending. Works with cash and multiple currencies without a bank link.
Kritik: Recurring transactions do not sync across devices. Several major updates resulted in total data loss. Detailed category reports are not available without a premium tier.
Für wen: Those who manage budgets across multiple currencies or wallets manually and do not need bank sync, but expect stable performance across devices.
Platz 45. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.004 Bewertungen
55von 100
A detailed manual tracker with analytics and thorough reports: multiple accounts, recurring transactions, transfers, multi-currency support. One-time purchase. Cross-device sync frequently breaks.
Gelobt: Detailed reports and visual analytics better than most competitors. Fast transaction entry. One-time purchase without recurring fees.
Kritik: Cross-device sync is unstable or does not work at all. Some users had to repurchase access after restoring a device. Transfers between accounts sometimes duplicate income.
Für wen: Users who manage their budget solo on a single device and value detailed reporting without a subscription.
Platz 46. Wert aus Rezensionen: 54 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 9.217 Bewertungen
54von 100
An app with a sound shared-budget concept and a pleasant interface. For those who budget manually without sync it runs more reliably. Bank sync causes transaction duplication and balance discrepancies.
Gelobt: Simple expense entry, a convenient category budget overview, and the option to manage it jointly with a partner. Works without a bank connection for those who prefer manual entry.
Kritik: The displayed running balance diverges from the real bank balance. Transactions frequently duplicate during sync. No proper end-of-month balance forecast.
Für wen: Couples and roommates who need a simple shared expense tracker and are willing to enter most records manually.
Platz 47. Wert aus Rezensionen: 53 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 105.405 Bewertungen
53von 100
MileIQ does one thing: automatic mileage tracking for tax deductions. Background GPS, one-swipe trip classification, and ready-made tax reports. It occasionally misses trips, leading to lost deduction data.
Gelobt: Automatic trip start and end detection without manual triggering. Business or personal trip classification with a single swipe. Tax reports generate automatically with the required fields.
Kritik: The app periodically misses trips or fails to detect the start, causing deductible mileage to be lost. Years of accumulated trip history are tied to the account: if access is lost, the data is gone. Route classification memory is unreliable and requires re-labeling the same locations.
Für wen: Self-employed individuals, couriers, real estate agents, and anyone who drives regularly for work and wants to automatically capture mileage for tax deductions.
Platz 48. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 9.250.689 Bewertungen
52von 100
A major bank super-app: balance is visible immediately, Zelle works, transfers between accounts and basic spending analytics function without issue. Budget understanding is at a statement level. the bank goes no deeper. The gap in spending awareness: the app shows what was spent but does not help understand why or what to do about it.
Gelobt: Instant transaction notifications give a sense of control. A clean overview of all accounts and cards on one screen. Zelle transfers arrive instantly without extra steps.
Kritik: No expense categories or balance forecast. only a transaction timeline. External account sync for overall wealth tracking periodically loses connection. Long-term history is available but without period analysis tools.
Für wen: Chase customers who need convenient access to their accounts. Not suitable for those seeking a proper budget tracker.
Platz 49. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 4.965 Bewertungen
52von 100
A gamified expense tracker: every expense generates a building in a virtual city. It motivates daily data entry, but after a year of accumulated data the app slows down and history is lost when switching phones.
Gelobt: The fear of missing a new building drives users to log every expense on the day of purchase, forming a genuine habit of spending awareness. The game mechanic reduces financial anxiety.
Kritik: After a year of data the app slows down significantly. History is lost when switching phones. Backup is unreliable. Category analytics require extra steps.
Für wen: Young people and students who need external motivation to keep a spending log and are not put off by manual entry.
Platz 50. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.288 Bewertungen
52von 100
A simple manual expense tracker without bank sync. Keeps a daily balance in mind through fast entry and provides a monthly category summary. When switching phones, history disappears because data lives only on the device.
Gelobt: Instant income and expense entry with customizable categories. A clear monthly summary without extra screens gives a sense of control.
Kritik: History is permanently lost when switching phones or resetting the device. No end-of-month balance forecast and no recurring transactions. Pop-up banners block the interface during entry.
Für wen: Those just starting to track expenses who want the simplest possible onboarding without registration.
Platz 51. Wert aus Rezensionen: 51 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 85.741 Bewertungen
51von 100
Qapital does one thing well: it turns trigger rules into automatic savings (round-up to the dollar, the 52-week rule, a percentage of income). Spending awareness is a side effect, not the primary function. When the mechanism works, users save effortlessly. When bank sync breaks or a withdrawal is blocked, support is essentially absent.
Gelobt: Flexible trigger rules for auto-saving: rounding up purchases, a percentage of incoming funds, a fixed weekly contribution. Visual savings goals with progress bars motivate continued saving.
Kritik: Bank sync breaks without warning and rules stop firing. Savings stall without the user noticing. Withdrawing saved funds takes significantly longer than advertised and is sometimes blocked without explanation. Closing an account through the app does not work. Support responds slowly.
Für wen: People who need automated savings by rules rather than a manual budget. Those willing to keep some money in the app on a short time horizon.
Platz 52. Wert aus Rezensionen: 50 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 633 Bewertungen
50von 100
A minimalist tracker with a clear pie chart and category breakdown. Valued for full manual control without bank access. When switching devices, history is completely lost without a backup.
Gelobt: Simple and fast income and expense logging by category. A clear pie chart. Year-over-year category comparison.
Kritik: When switching phones, the license does not restore. History is completely lost on reset without a backup. No balance forecast. The transaction limit in the free tier is not disclosed upfront.
Für wen: Those willing to pay for a simple no-frills tracker, provided they buy the full version immediately and understand there is no cloud backup.
Platz 53. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 12.695 Bewertungen
48von 100
A tool for photographing and organizing receipts to create PDF reports. Useful for sole traders and business travelers. Each major update has broken something that worked: scan quality has degraded and OCR frequently fails to read key fields.
Gelobt: Organizes receipts by project and reporting period and generates a ready-made PDF for an accountant. Long-term users value years of accumulated expense history.
Kritik: Data backup is limited in recent versions: data loss has become a real risk. OCR recognition is unreliable and does not capture key fields. After updates, users have to relearn the interface.
Für wen: Freelancers and small businesses who need receipt-based expense reports for tax authorities or employers, not a personal budget.
Platz 54. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 2.115 Bewertungen
48von 100
The most feature-complete tool in the category: budgets, accounts, forecasts, reports, CSV/QIF import, and multi-platform support. But Plaid sync is unreliable for many banks, and several updates have caused complete data loss or incorrect balances.
Gelobt: Tabular transaction view with bulk editing. like Quicken. Cross-device sync via a proprietary server has worked for many users for years. Detailed reports and budgets with manual entry available without bank connection.
Kritik: Bank connections via Plaid break for extended periods. Amounts do not match statements. Several updates deleted entered data with no recovery option. A high onboarding threshold during setup.
Für wen: Users migrating from Quicken or iBank who are willing to invest time in complex initial setup in exchange for a complete financial picture across all devices.
Platz 55. Wert aus Rezensionen: 47 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 3.471 Bewertungen
47von 100
A calendar-based planner: future income and expenses appear on dates so you can see what your account balance will be a week or a month from now. A unique cash-flow forecast mechanic. The classic version worked brilliantly. The new version (Dollarbird 2/3) received complaints about slowness, balance calculation errors, and a degraded transaction entry experience.
Gelobt: A running balance forecast for any future date. you can immediately see when a deficit will occur after planned expenses. Recurring payments are set up once and visible in the calendar for years.
Kritik: The balance calculation occasionally produces the wrong total, making the forecast unreliable. The new interface is slower and less intuitive than the classic one. The history sometimes hides old transactions.
Für wen: People who plan cash flow in advance (mortgage, installment payments, irregular income) and are comfortable with manual entry.
Platz 56. Wert aus Rezensionen: 46 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 2.647 Bewertungen
46von 100
A manual expense tracking app with budgets, multiple accounts, widgets, and Mac and Apple Watch support. Beautiful interface, good customization, and active development. A systemic issue: transaction history has been wiped after updates for some users on multiple occasions, undermining trust in the app as a long-term data store.
Gelobt: A live balance widget on the Lock Screen and Dynamic Island provides constant financial awareness without opening the app.
Kritik: Transaction history disappears after some updates. No bank sync. Cannot split a transaction across multiple categories. Notifications arrive too frequently and for irrelevant events.
Für wen: Apple ecosystem users (iPhone, Mac, Watch) who want a beautiful manual tracker with multi-device support and accept the risk of history loss during updates.
Platz 57. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 289.162 Bewertungen
44von 100
When Digit worked it was a model 'invisible savings' tool. The algorithm calculated how much could be set aside without touching current expenses. After the rebrand to Oportun, reliability dropped. Bank connections break, withdrawals are blocked without explanation, and goal history is lost. The core idea is sound. Execution has degraded.
Gelobt: The algorithm intelligently determines a savings amount based on the actual account balance rather than a fixed percentage. Multi-goal saving with different time horizons gives a clear progress picture.
Kritik: Bank sync regularly breaks and the app continues to move money even without current balance data. Withdrawals can be stuck for days or weeks without explanation. Changing your phone number or device can cut off access to saved funds.
Für wen: People who struggle with self-control and need to 'hide money from themselves.' Requires tolerance for technical failures and slow withdrawals.
Platz 58. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 7.028 Bewertungen
44von 100
A professional tool for teams working through Xero or QuickBooks. OCR recognition works but hits scan limits. Support is slow and canceling the service is problematic. Not suitable for personal budgeting.
Gelobt: Direct integration with Xero and QuickBooks saves accountants hours of manual work. Creating reimbursement expense reports from multiple sources simultaneously.
Kritik: The OCR scan limit runs out faster than expected. Canceling the service is extremely difficult: some users have been unable to do so for months. The interface is dated and unintuitive.
Für wen: Small businesses and teams that need automatic receipt processing with export to Xero or QuickBooks, not personal expense control.
Platz 59. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.370 Bewertungen
44von 100
A bank account aggregator with auto-categorization and spending analytics. All accounts in one place, automatic alerts for recurring charges and anomalies. But sync regularly falls behind or loses transactions.
Gelobt: Automatic detection of recurring charges and notifications when they increase. Aggregation of all accounts and cards on one screen. Alerts for anomalous transactions.
Kritik: Bank sync regularly lags by several days or loses transactions. Some users cannot connect certain banks. Key budgeting features are not available without extended access.
Für wen: People with multiple bank accounts and credit cards who want an overview in one place. provided their specific banks connect stably.
Platz 60. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 899 Bewertungen
44von 100
A bill tracker with reminders. Works best for those who want a calendar of upcoming payments. After updates, users report duplicate entries, disappearing bills, and incorrect balances.
Gelobt: A convenient list of upcoming payments on one screen. Payment reminders help avoid missing bills. Cross-platform on Android and iOS.
Kritik: Bills disappear or duplicate after updates. Account balance shows incorrect amounts. Editing a recurring payment date requires deleting and recreating the entry. No transaction breakdown by category.
Für wen: Those who need a simple reminder for payment due dates, not a spending analysis tool.
Platz 61. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 9.988 Bewertungen
42von 100
Primarily a credit score monitoring tool, not a budgeting app. It delivers real score data but the alert system operates on a cry-wolf basis: it sends urgent notifications for trivial events.
Gelobt: Daily credit score monitoring with alerts on changes. Useful for those rebuilding credit history who want to see score movement.
Kritik: Alerts are set to maximum anxiety: red headlines about minor changes create false panic situations. Notification buttons in the interface do not clear the counter after viewing. Budgeting functionality is virtually absent.
Für wen: People actively rebuilding or building a credit history in the US who need free daily score monitoring.
Platz 62. Wert aus Rezensionen: 40 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 7.645 Bewertungen
40von 100
The main feature. 'in your pocket' shows how much money you can spend right now after accounting for all upcoming obligations. When it works, it is a powerful tool. But bank sync breaks frequently and some major banks are not supported. Service reliability is inconsistent.
Gelobt: The 'in your pocket' widget gives an instant answer to 'how much can I spend today' after accounting for all future obligations. For impulse spenders, it is an effective limiter.
Kritik: Bank sync breaks and can stay broken for months. Certain major banks are not supported. The app runs slowly. Transactions are lost after updates.
Für wen: People prone to impulse spending who need one specific figure. 'how much is left today'. and whose bank is supported by the system.
Platz 63. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 17.615 Bewertungen
38von 100
A debt settlement service, not a personal finance control tool. Roughly a third of users describe hidden fees of 25%, lawsuits from creditors, and damaged credit scores. Successful stories are real, but outcomes are unpredictable and depend on specific creditors and circumstances.
Gelobt: Users who completed the program successfully note a single payment instead of many debts and a sense of control after years of fear of creditors.
Kritik: Opaque pricing: the 25% fee on the debt amount is not disclosed at the outset. The app provides almost no current picture of settlement status. only generic data with a delay.
Für wen: People with large consumer credit card debt who have exhausted other options and are prepared for a long program with risks to their credit history.
Platz 64. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 4.242 Bewertungen
38von 100
An app for scanning and storing receipts with OCR recognition. Speed and accuracy are praised. But the receipt history periodically breaks entirely, support goes silent, and data loss after updates is a documented pattern in reviews.
Gelobt: OCR accurately reads the amount, tax, and date from most receipts, saving manual entry for travel expense reports. Fast capture and automatic image cropping.
Kritik: Receipt history disappears after updates. Accounts get locked and cannot be restored. Support does not respond. Data export is only available with extended access.
Für wen: Business travelers with straightforward receipts, willing to accept the risk of data loss in exchange for fast scanning.
Platz 65. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,2★ · 2.340 Bewertungen
38von 100
A feature-rich app with a future transaction calendar, multiple accounts, and budgets. However, cross-device sync and bank connections break regularly and stay broken for months. Long-term users have lost data after updates.
Gelobt: A future payment planner on a calendar gives a real balance forecast. Three taps per transaction, a widget, and clean reports. Works without bank connection. Manual entry only.
Kritik: Sync between iPhone and iPad/Mac periodically breaks completely and stays broken for weeks. Bank connections via Plaid work only for major US banks. Some updates have wiped years of data.
Für wen: Users who track multiple accounts manually and want a budget calendar, but do not rely on reliable cross-platform sync.
Platz 66. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 61.916 Bewertungen
35von 100
UBS Wealth Management is an app for private banking clients, not for budgeting. It does not address spending awareness at all. Basic balance and portfolio display is unreliable: portfolio performance is not real-time, transaction history updates with a delay of several days, and fees are nowhere visible.
Gelobt: The interface design is clean and visually pleasant compared to other banking apps. Mobile account access is significantly more convenient than the web version for a quick check.
Kritik: Portfolio performance updates with a several-day delay rather than in real time, making current control impossible. Fees and charges are not clearly displayed anywhere. uninvited opacity frustrates long-standing clients. Logging in regularly requires multiple attempts due to authentication errors.
Für wen: UBS clients who need minimal mobile access to their accounts. Not suitable for active financial management or understanding spending.
Platz 67. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 11.350 Bewertungen
35von 100
The app promises a complete financial overview through automatic account sync, but sync is the main problem. Half of the negative reviews describe accounts failing to connect or losing transactions. The web version is significantly more powerful than the mobile app, which itself reflects the team's priorities.
Gelobt: When sync works, it provides a convenient unified account overview with spending categorization and a monthly spending plan. Users for whom everything set up correctly tend to stay long-term.
Kritik: Bank sync frequently breaks and does not restore without manual intervention. The mobile app is substantially inferior to the web version in features. No proper balance forecast accounting for planned expenses.
Für wen: Users already accustomed to the Quicken desktop ecosystem who want mobile access to the same data.
Platz 68. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,2★ · 2.244 Bewertungen
35von 100
A debit card with bitcoin cashback. For those who want to accumulate sats on everyday spending, the concept is interesting. But it is not a personal finance control tool: no budgeting, no balance forecast, no spending analytics.
Gelobt: Real bitcoin cashback on purchases without rounding gimmicks. Gift card discounts allow additional savings. Customer support resolves specific problems.
Kritik: Withdrawing money to an external bank is blocked for several days without explanation. Rewards program terms have been degraded multiple times within a single period. No proper budgeting tools or balance forecast.
Für wen: People committed to the bitcoin standard who are willing to use a separate debit card to accumulate sats. Not for those seeking a budget tracker.
Platz 69. Wert aus Rezensionen: 34 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 364.359 Bewertungen
34von 100
Rocket Money can find forgotten recurring charges and show a category budget. But auto-categorization of transactions is constantly wrong and cannot be customized, and account sync breaks without explanation or a self-service fix.
Gelobt: Auto-detection of forgotten recurring payments genuinely finds things users had forgotten about. A visual category budget with a limit alert works and gives a sense of control.
Kritik: Transaction auto-categorization is systematically wrong and requires constant manual correction, with no way to change the rules. Account sync breaks without explanation and with no way to fix it yourself.
Für wen: Those who want to quickly check for forgotten subscriptions. For ongoing budget tracking, the risks outweigh the benefits.
Platz 70. Wert aus Rezensionen: 34 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 2.683 Bewertungen
34von 100
An app with an envelope system and a receipt scanner. In practice: wallet balances change on their own, transactions disappear without reason, and bank integration is absent despite what the store listing says.
Gelobt: Unlimited wallets and the ability to attach a receipt photo to each transaction work consistently. The multi-wallet structure is visually clear.
Kritik: Balances change spontaneously. Entries disappear without cause. No entry of amounts below one dollar. Support does not respond. Bank integration is absent despite the store description.
Für wen: Android users with specific accounting scenarios. Using it on iPhone carries a real risk of data loss.
Platz 71. Wert aus Rezensionen: 34 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.241 Bewertungen
34von 100
A cash-counting app for bills and coins, not a budget tracker. It helps count physical money, set a savings goal, and see progress. Not suitable for tracking spending over time.
Gelobt: Instant denomination-by-denomination cash count and a clear savings goal progress display. Simple and uncluttered.
Kritik: Only a limited number of currencies are supported, so users from many countries cannot use it properly. Pop-up banners appear mid-entry and break the count. No history or analytics.
Für wen: Those who work with cash and want to quickly count bills or track a piggy bank. Not for household budgeting.
Platz 72. Wert aus Rezensionen: 33 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 5.846 Bewertungen
33von 100
A feature-rich tool with a solid manual mode and support for multiple accounts and currencies. The problem: bank sync is unreliable for most users. accounts disconnect, numbers diverge from reality, and reconnection takes days. The manual mode works well for those who do not attempt to sync accounts.
Gelobt: A powerful multi-account mode for manually tracking cash, cards, and different currencies simultaneously. Detailed transaction history and flexible categories.
Kritik: Bank sync breaks and shows incorrect balances. Data diverges from the real account. Support is slow to help. A lifetime purchase does not guarantee a working product in the long term.
Für wen: People who manage their finances strictly manually without bank sync and need detailed multi-account, multi-currency tracking.
Platz 73. Wert aus Rezensionen: 33 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 2.992 Bewertungen
33von 100
An envelope-style budget planner with a pleasant interface. The envelope concept is well suited for beginners. Critical issue: the app does not disclose its terms until after the user has spent an hour completing full envelope setup.
Gelobt: The envelope system with visual balance indicators is intuitive for budgeting newcomers. The visual design is pleasant.
Kritik: Terms are not disclosed until setup is complete. Transactions cannot be added with a past date. No bank sync. No balance forecast.
Für wen: Beginners who want to try the envelope method, provided they know the subscription cost upfront.
Platz 74. Wert aus Rezensionen: 32 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.660 Bewertungen
32von 100
An app with a long history that handled manual expense tracking well for many years. A major interface overhaul broke navigation and removed familiar features. Cross-device sync is unstable.
Gelobt: Before the major update: fast entry, future balance forecast, intuitive categorization with custom icons. After the fix: receipt photos, customizable reports.
Kritik: Cross-device sync does not work for some users. The major update removed key features without a rollback option. A new update now captures all text files on the device.
Für wen: Users who have been using this app for years and do not want to switch. New users have more reliable alternatives.
Platz 75. Wert aus Rezensionen: 31 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 154.527 Bewertungen
31von 100
Expensify was built as the best travel expense tool: SmartScan receipts, auto-generated reports, and accounting integrations. After a sweeping redesign, navigation became illogical and expense tracking reliability dropped.
Gelobt: SmartScan from a receipt photo worked accurately and saved time. Automatic expense report creation from a set of receipts is still more convenient than manual entry.
Kritik: After the redesign, basic scenarios require significantly more steps. Chat-bot support does not resolve problems.
Für wen: Small businesses and freelancers who need travel expense tracking with accounting integration. Excessive and inconvenient for personal budgeting.
Platz 76. Wert aus Rezensionen: 29 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 6.180 Bewertungen
29von 100
An app with good design and strong potential that systematically degraded over several years. Sync between the mobile and web app stopped working. Users lost data after updates. Support was unresponsive for weeks. This is the story of an abandoned product.
Gelobt: Beautiful interface, flexible wallets for different accounts and currencies, family budget capability. At its best. an excellent shared expense app.
Kritik: Sync between devices and the web version regularly breaks for weeks. Updates several times caused lost transactions and changed amounts. Major banks including Chase are not supported. Support does not respond.
Für wen: Hard to recommend to anyone given the systemic unreliability. Historically suited those who wanted a beautiful multi-currency tracker with family access.
Platz 77. Wert aus Rezensionen: 29 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 4.719 Bewertungen
29von 100
A bill tracker with color coding and payment reminders. In practice: notifications regularly stop working, data is lost after updates, and cross-device sync is unreliable.
Gelobt: Color-coded payment statuses and working reminders provide real peace of mind about upcoming bill due dates. A clear list of the nearest mandatory payments.
Kritik: Upcoming payment notifications often fail to fire. History and data disappear after updates. Sync between phone and tablet does not work. Support is inaccessible.
Für wen: Users with a small number of recurring bills who are willing to accept instability in exchange for a simple interface.
Platz 78. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 237.887 Bewertungen
28von 100
Cleo gives a weekly spending breakdown by category and balance notifications. As a financial control tool it is limited: no balance forecast, unreliable categorization, and no way to unlink a bank account after connecting.
Gelobt: A spending breakdown by category with a brief weekly summary gives a quick picture of spending patterns. Balance notifications arrive in a timely manner.
Kritik: No way to unlink a bank account after it has been connected. Support operates via a chat bot that does not resolve real problems and cannot escalate to a live agent. No balance forecast and no reliable categorization.
Für wen: Not recommended: cash advances are expensive and the budgeting feature does not compensate for the risks. For spending tracking, better alternatives exist.
Platz 79. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 10.065 Bewertungen
28von 100
The only specialized app for couples' shared budgeting. The concept is right, but the product is clearly underdeveloped or abandoned: support has been silent for months, bugs are not fixed, and bank sync is unstable. Users keep it only because there are almost no alternatives.
Gelobt: The ability to see each partner's personal and shared accounts separately. Simple spending notifications for the partner. Categories and budgets visible to both.
Kritik: History is stored for only 6 months. medium-term planning is not possible. Bank sync breaks and does not recover. Support does not respond for weeks. Many features look unfinished.
Für wen: Couples looking for a shared expense tracker who are willing to accept instability in exchange for the transparency of a shared budget.
Platz 80. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 3,7★ · 2.465 Bewertungen
28von 100
The app was built on a strong idea: swiping through every transaction manually and categorizing it so that money feels real. This created genuine spending awareness. Over time the app has stopped working en masse for users.
Gelobt: The swipe-through mechanic gave an almost tactile feel to each purchase. New users noted that this manual tagging ritual was the first thing that made them notice their spending.
Kritik: After an update the app stopped launching for regular users. Weekly spending reports suddenly became inaccessible. No way to add cash outside a bank account. Support does not respond.
Für wen: The audience that was looking for a simple visual way to monitor a card is now forced to leave. The app in its current state is not suitable for anyone in particular.
Platz 81. Wert aus Rezensionen: 26 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 5.795 Bewertungen
26von 100
A corporate travel expense tool disguised as a personal app. Most personal users discover they cannot register without a corporate email. Among corporate users there are reliability issues with servers, inability to edit submitted reports, and an absence of proper support.
Gelobt: Fast expense report creation for travel reimbursement. Receipt photo capture with automatic attachment to a report works when the service is not down.
Kritik: Registration without a corporate email is impossible. most users discover this only after downloading. Editing a submitted report is nearly impossible. Servers are unreliable. Support does not respond or redirects incorrectly.
Für wen: Employees of companies where TravelBank has been selected corporately for travel expense management. Not for personal budgeting.
Platz 82. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 314.812 Bewertungen
22von 100
Albert positions itself as a financial assistant, but reviews paint a different picture: charges without consent, automatic 'smart savings' that withdraw money without the user's knowledge, and a deliberately broken cancellation process. Its usefulness for spending awareness is close to zero given these risks.
Gelobt: Payday advances are approved quickly and helped some users in emergencies. The interface is visually appealing.
Kritik: Automatic money withdrawals without notification or consent. Account closure is artificially blocked by technical traps. Transaction history and categories are shown but data disappears after support disputes. Support does not respond for months.
Für wen: Not recommended for anyone in its current state. Payday advances are simpler and safer to find elsewhere.
Platz 83. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 4.308 Bewertungen
22von 100
A visually polished budget planner with multiple accounts, credit cards, and goals. Claims cross-device sync and bank connections, but that is exactly where everything breaks: balance differs between phone and web, data disappears, and part of the interface appears in Portuguese. The app is Brazilian in origin and is roughly implemented for English-speaking users.
Gelobt: A visual dashboard with goal progress and payment reminders appeals to those who manage to get it working.
Kritik: Cross-device sync does not work: balances diverge. Several months of history disappear after reinstallation. The interface switches to Portuguese. No balance forecast.
Für wen: Practically no one at this point: too many systemic failures for everyday financial tracking.
Platz 84. Wert aus Rezensionen: 20 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 7.352 Bewertungen
20von 100
The Belco credit union mobile banking app, not an independent financial management tool. A significant portion of users cannot log in, have lost transfer features, or face repeated authentication errors. The high rating reflects customer loyalty to the credit union itself, not to the app.
Gelobt: Fast balance check via biometrics when it works. Loyal union members value convenient access to familiar operations.
Kritik: Authentication breaks when switching networks. Updates regularly disable transfer features that were working. Balance does not update in real time after transactions. No budgeting functionality at all.
Für wen: Belco Credit Union members exclusively who need basic mobile access to their account.
Platz 85. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 68.026 Bewertungen
18von 100
The Budget Car Rental app lets you book and manage reservations, but it is a rental service storefront, not a personal finance management tool. In a financial control context it is useless: it does not help understand expenses, shows no budget, and keeps no spending history. Separately: the rental service itself receives many complaints about undisclosed add-on charges.
Gelobt: Booking and viewing reservation details works without extra steps. The Fastbreak loyalty program displays correctly.
Kritik: The app does not automatically sync reservations after login and does not remember saved data. No transparent display of the final amount before handing over the keys. Rental history over several years is stored unreliably.
Für wen: For managing Budget Car Rental reservations only. Not applicable as a financial tool.
Platz 86. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 3,8★ · 3.698 Bewertungen
18von 100
An app with automatic bank sync and spending categorization. The concept is modern, but execution is rough: transactions duplicate, categories reset, and account connections freeze. Several rounds of overhauls have not resolved the underlying issues.
Gelobt: The concept of automatic sync and a clean overview of all accounts in one place appeals to those tired of manual entry. The visual design is modern and pleasant.
Kritik: Transactions duplicate and fail to bind to categories. Categories reset. Support does not respond for weeks. No way to disconnect an account and export data.
Für wen: Fans of the Financial Audit podcast willing to risk a subscription in hopes of the next update.
Platz 87. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 3,9★ · 2.047 Bewertungen
18von 100
The app was a popular manual expense register for more than ten years. In 2024-2025, several updates wiped data for users with years of history. The developer stopped responding to requests. The company website is offline.
Gelobt: In its prime. a simple and clear spending log without bank integration. The discipline of manual entry was valued by users.
Kritik: The 2024-2025 update deleted transaction history for users with years of data. Sync on a new device freezes and does not complete. Support does not respond. The website is down.
Für wen: Not recommended to anyone at this point. If data has not yet been lost, export it immediately.
Platz 88. Wert aus Rezensionen: 11 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 3.844 Bewertungen
11von 100
Claims receipt scanning and report generation for expense reimbursement. In practice: OCR assigns the wrong date, the app loses uploaded receipts, and reports either fail to generate or produce a blank page.
Gelobt: The idea of instantly scanning a receipt and getting a ready report for accounting theoretically saves hours. Fast image capture.
Kritik: Receipts are lost after updates. OCR assigns the wrong date almost every time. Reports fail to generate or produce a blank page. History cannot be viewed without extended access.
Für wen: No one: the app does not perform its core function reliably enough for real-world use.
Platz 89. Wert aus Rezensionen: 10 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 15.013 Bewertungen
10von 100
A corporate tool for timesheet and travel expense tracking, imposed on contractor employees by employers. Users are unanimous: constant session drops, lost entered data, and an archaic interface make daily timesheet entry an ordeal. Not applicable as a personal finance tool at all.
Gelobt: The only upside: the ability to submit a timesheet from a phone without opening a laptop, when the app does not crash.
Kritik: The session drops several times a day, taking unsaved data with it. No proper PIN login. The interface has not been updated in years and requires training for basic actions.
Für wen: Exclusively employees of companies where Costpoint has been selected corporately, with no alternative available.
Platz 90. Wert aus Rezensionen: 10 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 2.325 Bewertungen
10von 100
The app collects income and expense data, then locks access to it without warning. Basic functionality such as month-over-month comparison and history editing is absent even with extended access.
Gelobt: A clear remaining-budget screen is convenient at a glance. Fast expense category setup at the start.
Kritik: Data entered during setup disappears behind a paywall without warning. Past months cannot be viewed or edited. Constant pop-up requests appear every 45 seconds.
Für wen: Not recommended to anyone in its current state.
Platz 91. Wert aus Rezensionen: 5 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 1.658 Bewertungen
5von 100
The concept of converting a price into work hours is interesting as an awareness tool, but the implementation amounts to simple division. There is no expense management, no forecasts, and no history.
Gelobt: The idea of converting a price into work hours creates a psychological pause before an impulse purchase.
Kritik: All functionality is locked without extended access. A rating request appears before the user has tried anything. Functionality amounts to a single formula that any calculator provides for free.
Für wen: No one. Any calculator solves this problem for free.
Platz 92. Wert aus Rezensionen: 4 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 903 Bewertungen
4von 100
This is a digital magazine reader, not a financial app. Its only function is to read downloaded issues. Most users cannot even log in: web access credentials are not recognized by the app. Support does not respond.
Gelobt: The magazine content is considered useful by the rare users for whom login did work. The familiar magazine article format on personal finance topics.
Kritik: Login does not work for most users. Web subscription credentials are not recognized in the app. Issue history disappears after updates. No working user support.
Für wen: No one, until login and subscription integration issues are resolved.
Zu den Bewertungen
Zwei Bewertungen — zwei Quellen
Sie helfen beim Vergleich von Apps, ersetzen aber nicht die Prüfung der eigenen Aufgabe.
Rezensionsbewertung · bis 100
Die gespeicherte Bewertung aus der inApp-Recherche zu den Rezensionstexten. Sie beurteilt die App im Archiv insgesamt, nicht die Zuverlässigkeit einer einzelnen Funktion.
Store-Bewertung · bis 5
Die Bewertung von der App-Seite zum Zeitpunkt der Datenerhebung. Aktuelle Bewertung und Version können abweichen.
In der archivierten Stichprobe dieses Themas: 92 Apps und 32.414 gelesene Rezensionen. Das ist der Gesamtumfang der Recherche, nicht die Zahl der Rezensionen pro App.
Ein Abstand zwischen den Bewertungen beweist keine Manipulation. Das Datum der Berechnung und die vollständige Methodik der Bewertung sind nicht im mobilen Archiv. Vergleich die Aufgabenbeschreibungen und die Originalzitate und prüf die Bedingungen in der aktuellen Version.
