Find clear learning material for the language or writing system they need and for their own communication situation.

Welche Apps genutzt werden

Diese Apps werden in der Analyse dieser Aufgabe genannt. Öffne jede, um Stärken und Grenzen zu vergleichen. Die Reihenfolge der Liste ist keine Rangliste der Eignung.

1. 49

   Ling – Learn Languages Easily

   Platz 49. Wert aus Rezensionen: 53 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 13.845 Bewertungen

   53von 100

   

   The widest coverage of rare languages among the apps tested: Tagalog, Thai, Khmer, Mongolian, and dozens more. The basic lesson structure of phrase, translation, native-speaker audio, and writing practice works. Main weakness: beginners are dropped into sentences without an explanation of the alphabet, and the speaking practice feature is not available for all languages.

   Gelobt: Learners of rare languages have no comparable alternative in terms of breadth. Audio from claimed native speakers sets the app apart from many competitors. Tagalog users complete full courses and praise the structure.

   Kritik: Beginners are thrown into sentences without an introduction to basic characters, which is especially acute for Thai, Khmer, and Tamil. Speaking practice does not work for all languages. Translations in some languages contain errors. Abrupt jump to complex structures without gradual buildup.

   Für wen: Learners of rare languages (Tagalog, Thai, Khmer, Swahili) for whom Ling is the only structured mobile option. For widely spoken languages better alternatives exist.

2. 68

   Drops: Language Learning Games

   Platz 68. Wert aus Rezensionen: 40 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 71.261 Bewertungen

   40von 100

   

   The best mobile tool for memorizing vocabulary through pictures, not for speech. Fast visual association sessions lock words in well. No grammar at all, no speaking practice, and not enough depth to reach free conversation.

   Gelobt: Visual word association without translation to the native language. Fast five-minute sessions. Rare languages (Tagalog, Icelandic, Ukrainian). A simple uncluttered interface.

   Kritik: Teaches only word recognition, not language use. No grammar or listening practice in a communicative context. After weeks of use you know words but cannot build sentences.

   Für wen: Beginners who want a fast visual vocabulary starter before moving to a course with grammar and speaking.

3. 39

   Innovative Language Learning

   Platz 39. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 34.085 Bewertungen

   60von 100

   

   Audio podcasts for language learning in a format where two native speakers converse and a third explains the structure. The method works for listening comprehension and picking up natural speech. Several users report a real breakthrough in Japanese, Russian, and Romanian. The mobile app is significantly thinner than the web version: no flashcards, no offline, and audio sometimes cuts out.

   Gelobt: Lessons built around real dialogues with cultural context rather than textbook phrases. Supports rare languages such as Romanian, Afrikaans, and Norwegian where almost no other resources exist.

   Kritik: Audio only, no active speaking practice, and no pronunciation feedback. The immersion-through-listening method requires additional tools to reach speaking fluency.

   Für wen: Those who learn while commuting or walking and want to hear natural native speech with structural explanations, like an advanced audio textbook.

4. 15

   Cake - Learn English & Korean

   Platz 15. Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 15.477 Bewertungen

   72von 100

   

   A video-driven course in Korean and English built around scenes from real films and clips. The strongest feature is authentic speech: words are learned in living context, you can slow the video, and there is a repeat-after-me mode. Works especially well for users drawn in by K-pop and dramas.

   Gelobt: Users note that Hangul sticks quickly thanks to structured lessons. The video format with pause and repeat gives a feel for the intonation and pace of natural speech. Content featuring BTS and other groups keeps motivation high.

   Kritik: Most content is behind the Cake Plus paywall. Phonetic transcription (Latin alphabet) is not always provided, which hampers pronunciation in the early stages. Deep grammar is sparse: the app builds vocabulary and listening comprehension but does not explain language structure.

   Für wen: Beginners, especially fans of K-pop and Korean culture, who want to understand spoken language and say basic phrases rather than study grammar academically.

Weitere Aufgaben in diesem Thema