Zum Inhalt springen
Auswahl nach Aufgabe

Quickly reactivate a language they had a few years ago: not learn from scratch but restore the basics and get to a working level

Sprachenlernen

Die Texte zu den Apps sind auf Englisch.

People coming back after a break

Was vor der Wahl zu prüfen ist

After a break, skills come back unevenly. What matters is starting from a suitable exercise and being able to skip what is known without hiding the gaps in other skills.

Welche Apps genutzt werden

Diese Apps werden in der Analyse dieser Aufgabe genannt. Öffne jede, um Stärken und Grenzen zu vergleichen. Die Reihenfolge der Liste ist keine Rangliste der Eignung.

  1. Memrise Easy Language Learning

    Platz 58. Wert aus Rezensionen: 46 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 215.322 Bewertungen

    The app's unique strength is native-speaker video clips that lodge words in memory better than text. Community-made courses have been removed and the structure has broken down. The AI conversation partner exists but generates incorrect sentences.

    Gelobt: Video fragments from real native speakers for word memorization. A wide language selection including rare ones. AI dialogues for live speech practice. A clean and fast interface.

    Kritik: Community courses that made Memrise distinctive have been removed. The AI generates grammatically incorrect sentences. Progress can reset unexpectedly. The paywall blocks most content.

    Für wen: Intermediate learners who want video-based vocabulary building and have already established a grammar foundation elsewhere.

  2. Pimsleur | Language Learning

    Platz 6. Wert aus Rezensionen: 78 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 27.768 Bewertungen

    An audio course that teaches speaking and listening comprehension through active recall from the very first lesson. Spaced repetition is built into the audio: the app asks you to reproduce a phrase at increasing intervals. Users with five languages under their belt call Pimsleur the best method for reaching conversational fluency. Grammar is not explained explicitly but absorbed through context.

    Gelobt: You can learn hands-free with no screen: lessons run 30 minutes and only require earphones. Several users report having real conversations with native speakers after finishing the first level, a concrete result rather than just a feeling of progress.

    Kritik: No written component and no grammar explanations. For learners who study through reading and systematic analysis the method works poorly. Difficulty cannot be adjusted: the app starts from zero regardless of your existing knowledge.

    Für wen: Those who want to speak and understand spoken language, learn on the go, and are comfortable with an audio-only format without visual support.

  3. LingQ | Learn Languages

    Platz 7. Wert aus Rezensionen: 78 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 9.802 Bewertungen

    One of the few tools that genuinely builds listening comprehension and reading ability through immersion in real content. Users choose their own materials, words are tracked automatically, and progress is visible. Weak spots: clunky interface and inaccurate translations for some languages (Japanese).

    Gelobt: You can read and listen to any content in your target language, click unfamiliar words, and see a contextual translation. One user reached conversational Ukrainian in two years.

    Kritik: No grammar explanations and no pronunciation feedback. The interface is cluttered. Not a good fit for absolute beginners: a foundation is required.

    Für wen: Those who already know a few hundred words and want to reach a level of understanding authentic speech through reading and listening.

Weitere Aufgaben in diesem Thema

Gesamte Rangliste: Sprachenlernen95 Apps mit Screenshots und WertenWoher diese Analyse stammtRecherche und Beobachtungen aus Rezensionen lesen