Wert aus Rezensionen: 74 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 40.652.628 Bewertungen
74von 100
A mature streaming service with a strong recommendation engine and an enormous catalog. Its one core product flaw: the shuffle algorithm keeps cycling through the same 20 tracks from a thousand-song playlist.
Gelobt
Personalized mixes and stations reliably match the mood and regularly surface new artists.
Kritik
The shuffle algorithm loops through the same songs instead of covering the full playlist evenly.
Für wen: Listeners who care about personalization and discovering new music
Wert aus Rezensionen: 74 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 15.612 Bewertungen
74von 100
The best specialized service for classical music fans: the catalog is organized by work and performer, not just by album, which is critical for the genre. The mood feature is accurate, and the ability to compare multiple recordings of the same piece is unique in the market.
Gelobt
Navigation by work with the ability to compare multiple performances of the same symphony or sonata is not available on any mainstream streaming service.
Kritik
Navigating large catalogs is awkward because there is no quick alphabetical jump, so you have to scroll through thousands of names manually.
Für wen: Classical music fans who need to find specific works and performers rather than just streaming background audio
Wert aus Rezensionen: 73 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 11.161 Bewertungen
73von 100
A specialized classical library with proper attribution by conductor, orchestra, and period that fills a gap no mainstream streaming service covers. Weak spots include slow scrolling, no proper playlist shuffle, and limited Indian classical coverage.
Gelobt
Deep catalog organization by performer and era that is not available in ordinary music services.
Kritik
Long playlists scroll slowly, and the shuffle function only works through the main Apple Music app.
Für wen: Classical fans who need correct attribution and catalog depth
Platz 4. Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 9.739 Bewertungen
72von 100
The best option for people who want to stream their own library in high quality from any device. FLAC support, gapless playback, and smart rediscovery of a personal collection set it apart. Shuffle repeats the same order, the CarPlay interface is sparse, and navigation takes some getting used to.
Gelobt: Stream your own FLAC files from anywhere via a Plex server without paying for a catalog.
Kritik: Shuffle mode plays tracks in the same order every time it starts.
Für wen: Collectors with a personal music library who want to stream their own files
Platz 5. Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 3.478 Bewertungen
72von 100
A reliable Russian-language radio aggregator with a good station selection, stable streams, and CarPlay support. Navigation through the large list is awkward, and individual stations drop out occasionally.
Gelobt: A wide selection of Russian radio stations in one place, including rare and regional ones.
Kritik: Navigating hundreds of stations is awkward and it is easy to lose the one you want.
Für wen: Russian-speaking listeners abroad and fans of specific Russian stations
Platz 6. Wert aus Rezensionen: 71 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.898.411 Bewertungen
71von 100
The only platform with real access to unreleased tracks, demos, and independent artists. The interface lags well behind Spotify in terms of organizational convenience, and AI-generated music in the feed degrades the quality of discovery.
Gelobt: A catalog of unreleased tracks, demos, and rarities that is unavailable on any other major platform.
Kritik: There are no tools to train the feed: you cannot flag a disliked artist and they keep appearing in recommendations.
Für wen: Underground music fans, DJs, and people who follow artists before their official releases
Platz 7. Wert aus Rezensionen: 67 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 2.874.698 Bewertungen
67von 100
A catalog of over 100 million tracks and lossless audio quality make Apple Music a strong choice for audiophiles within the Apple ecosystem. The interface gets redesigned regularly without improving navigation logic, and the recommendation algorithm is slow to learn the user's taste.
Gelobt: Audio quality is flawless, and integration with Apple devices and CarPlay is frictionless.
Kritik: The recommendation algorithm is hard to train to your taste: the app stubbornly pushes popular music instead of niche picks.
Für wen: Audiophiles in the Apple ecosystem with an already well-formed music taste
Platz 8. Wert aus Rezensionen: 67 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 88.720 Bewertungen
67von 100
Mixcloud remains the best place for DJ mixes, club sets, and alternative radio, but removing the 30-second skip button and declining stability in 2025-2026 have frustrated long-time users.
Gelobt: The only service with a real library of DJ sets and live mixes from thousands of artists.
Kritik: The 30-second skip was removed and navigation within long mixes is restricted without a subscription.
Für wen: Electronic music fans, club set listeners, and DJ mix enthusiasts
Platz 9. Wert aus Rezensionen: 67 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 18.576 Bewertungen
67von 100
Qobuz wins on audio quality and fair treatment of artists, which builds a loyal audience willing to tolerate its shortcomings. Unstable playback and weak recommendation algorithms prevent it from becoming a full replacement for Spotify for users accustomed to modern streaming convenience.
Gelobt: The high-resolution audio is genuinely audible without extra equipment, especially in the car and on good headphones.
Kritik: The personalization algorithm is extremely weak: there is no way to block overplayed tracks, and daily and weekly picks are predictable and repetitive.
Für wen: Audiophiles and people who want to support artists financially without sacrificing sound quality
Platz 10. Wert aus Rezensionen: 67 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 3.407 Bewertungen
67von 100
The best choice for listeners who store their own collection on OneDrive or Google Drive: supports large libraries, offline caching, and CarPlay. Scanning collections above 15,000 tracks is slow, and playlist creation is cumbersome.
Gelobt: The only player in this niche that actually reads a large personal collection from the cloud.
Kritik: Creating and managing playlists is cumbersome with large libraries.
Für wen: Music collectors with their own collection on a cloud drive
Platz 11. Wert aus Rezensionen: 66 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 8.723.378 Bewertungen
66von 100
Best-in-class music recognition for modern tracks from popular platforms. Historical and live recordings are recognized inconsistently, and the Shazam history periodically loses saved results.
Gelobt: Instantly identifies most modern tracks and immediately offers to open them in your favorite streaming app.
Kritik: Older and live music recognition is hit or miss, and the Shazam history is unstable and loses entries.
Für wen: People who frequently hear unfamiliar tracks and want to identify them quickly
Platz 12. Wert aus Rezensionen: 63 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 1.901 Bewertungen
63von 100
A strong concept for people who want to keep a listening diary and rank albums the way Letterboxd works for films. The community is active, the developer is responsive, but the app crashes and lags frequently enough to make it hard to use.
Gelobt: A community of genuine music enthusiasts and an attentive developer create a rare sense of trust.
Kritik: You cannot log a listen with a past date, which breaks the diary-keeping experience.
Für wen: Listeners who enjoy consciously tracking and rating albums
Platz 13. Wert aus Rezensionen: 63 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 1.689 Bewertungen
63von 100
Free internet radio with artist-based personalization that is stable and ad-free for most users. The main product flaw: the recommendation algorithm occasionally inserts tracks from the wrong genre, and there is no search for specific songs.
Gelobt: Listeners note that they can listen to similar music for hours without a subscription and without ad interruptions.
Kritik: The station algorithm inserts off-genre tracks into the stream, especially when independent artists are added.
Für wen: People who want free mood-based radio without fiddling with settings
Platz 14. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.109.924 Bewertungen
62von 100
The best live radio aggregator in the world: thousands of stations from different countries, sports broadcasts, and niche formats like Coast to Coast AM. Background playback occasionally stops after a signal loss and does not resume automatically.
Gelobt: Access to live international radio from any country without a VPN, all in one place.
Kritik: Background playback is unstable: after a brief connection drop the stream does not resume automatically.
Für wen: Fans of live radio, sports broadcasts, and niche formats from around the world
Platz 15. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 242.920 Bewertungen
62von 100
Tidal offers the best audio quality in the category and a wider catalog than most competitors, but offline downloads are unreliable, search requires exact spelling, and aggressive rating prompts annoy even loyal users.
Gelobt: Audio quality is noticeably better than Spotify, especially on good hardware.
Kritik: Offline mode is unstable: downloaded playlists are sometimes unavailable when there is no network.
Für wen: Audiophiles and music fans willing to pay for sound quality
Platz 16. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 55.753 Bewertungen
62von 100
One of the best standalone players on iOS for people who store their own music: thoughtful import, metadata editing, EQ, and background playback all work reliably. Occasional crashes after updates and the removal of the play-count sort feature noticeably hurt the experience.
Gelobt: Metadata editing directly in the app and stable background playback.
Kritik: After updates, favorite features sometimes disappear and the developer does not bring them back.
Für wen: Owners of mp3 collections who need a powerful offline player
Platz 17. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 8.907 Bewertungen
62von 100
Excellent radio-format streaming with a rich genre selection for listeners who do not want to build playlists themselves. You cannot search for or play a specific artist or track, only themed channels.
Gelobt: Broad genre coverage from old-school soul to instrumental jazz with nothing to configure.
Kritik: There is no way to find and play a specific artist or song, only preset channels.
Für wen: Background listeners who enjoy a radio format without having to pick tracks
Platz 18. Wert aus Rezensionen: 61 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 36.411 Bewertungen
61von 100
Deezer offers a solid streaming catalog with good audio quality and decent recommendations, and stands out for the ability to block unwanted artists. Downsides are product-level: uneven volume between tracks, occasional CarPlay glitches, and a somewhat confusing UX on first launch.
Gelobt: Audio quality is noticeably better than competitors, and you can block individual artists directly in settings.
Kritik: Volume jumps between tracks without normalization, and CarPlay periodically loses the playback queue.
Für wen: People who value audio quality and are looking for a Spotify alternative
Platz 19. Wert aus Rezensionen: 61 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 18.711 Bewertungen
61von 100
One of the best options for listeners with their own collection: supports cloud storage, has a tag editor, and library filtering. The key downside is that the monetization model has shifted against users and ads in the free version have become aggressive, including fraudulent banners.
Gelobt: Connecting to multiple cloud storage services simultaneously and full search with filtering across a large library work better than competitors.
Kritik: Album artwork cannot be edited through the built-in tag editor, even though all other fields are available for editing.
Für wen: Music fans with a personal collection in the cloud who want to listen to their own music without being tied to streaming services
Platz 20. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 11.226.945 Bewertungen
58von 100
A pioneer of taste-algorithm radio stations: works well for background listening when you do not want to build playlists. The key flaw is that a station created around an artist drifts far from the original artist over time.
Gelobt: The Music Genome algorithm builds a stream of similar tracks without any effort from the user.
Kritik: A station tuned to a specific artist quickly drifts toward unrelated music.
Für wen: Fans of the radio format without manual playlist control
Platz 21. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 8.371 Bewertungen
58von 100
The best local FLAC player on iOS with a customizable interface and equalizer. Playlists sometimes get stuck on the first track, large files cause crashes, and navigation requires some adjustment.
Gelobt: The only reliable option for playing a FLAC collection without compression on iOS.
Kritik: Playlists get stuck on the first track after an iOS update, and large lossless files periodically cause crashes.
Für wen: Audiophiles with a personal FLAC collection on iOS
Platz 22. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 3,7★ · 5.676 Bewertungen
58von 100
VLC on iOS reliably plays local collections in any format including FLAC, but the mobile interface lags behind the desktop version: no search bar, Bluetooth connection cuts the beginning of tracks, and gapless playback does not work.
Gelobt: Support for any file format and playback with the screen off, no subscriptions required.
Kritik: With Bluetooth connected, the start of each track is cut off by about a second, which breaks smooth listening.
Für wen: Audiophiles with their own FLAC and rare-format collection
Platz 23. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 3.349 Bewertungen
58von 100
The only specialized app for Greek radio serving the diaspora abroad. Basic functionality works well, but stability drops after updates: crashes, lost favorites, non-working stations.
Gelobt: Wide coverage of Greek radio stations for listeners outside Greece.
Kritik: After updates the app loses stability: saved stations disappear and some streams stop working.
Für wen: The Greek diaspora in the US, Australia, and other countries
Platz 24. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 1.811 Bewertungen
58von 100
The best interface for navigating a personal music library on iOS: sorting, queues, and customization are better than Apple Music. The problem is that recent updates have broken launch stability and some users are leaving.
Gelobt: Lets you see and manage your personal music collection the way you want, without an imposed streaming interface.
Kritik: After recent updates the app freezes on launch and requires several attempts to open.
Für wen: Owners of large personal collections on-device who do not want Apple Music
Platz 25. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.978.246 Bewertungen
55von 100
A strong position in the hip-hop and independent artist niche: tracks available here are not on Spotify. The Audiomod feature with tempo change and reverb directly in the player sets the app apart, though the mainstream catalog is incomplete.
Gelobt: Tracks from independent and emerging artists are available for free and in good quality.
Kritik: A significant portion of mainstream and international artists are absent from the platform or only partially represented.
Für wen: Hip-hop, indie, and new artist listeners who value access to exclusive content
Platz 26. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 203.908 Bewertungen
55von 100
Anghami occupies a unique niche as the best streaming service for Arabic-language content, but a notable portion of the international catalog is unavailable or disappears without warning, and playlist sorting does not persist between sessions.
Gelobt: The best Arabic music coverage among all streaming services.
Kritik: The catalog is unstable: popular tracks go unavailable without explanation, and playlist sorting resets.
Für wen: Listeners of Arabic and Middle Eastern music
Platz 27. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 6.884 Bewertungen
55von 100
Simple country-themed streaming radio that delivers the genre listeners want without extra setup. The main weakness is that the stream periodically drops after a few minutes of playback.
Gelobt: Wide coverage of country styles from old-school to new releases in a single stream without manual searching.
Kritik: The stream regularly stops on its own after 5-10 minutes and has to be restarted manually.
Für wen: Country fans who want background radio without picking tracks
Platz 28. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,2★ · 3.146 Bewertungen
55von 100
One of the best players for FLAC and personal collections, with a parametric equalizer and Last.fm scrobbling. Over the past year, problems with VOX Cloud sync, CarPlay, and playback reliability have been mounting.
Gelobt: A parametric equalizer, FLAC support, and SoundCloud integration without ads in one player.
Kritik: Sync between devices via VOX Cloud is unreliable and frequently breaks.
Für wen: Audiophiles with personal FLAC collections and high audio quality requirements
Platz 29. Wert aus Rezensionen: 53 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 33.897 Bewertungen
53von 100
NhacCuaTui is strong on Vietnamese music catalog and offline mode, and part of its audience has been using it for over six years. Product issues include limited reach beyond Vietnamese music, tracks disappearing during playlist imports, and broken integration with external speakers (SONOS).
Gelobt: An extensive Vietnamese catalog with offline mode and years of stable operation.
Kritik: When transferring playlists from other services most tracks are lost, and SONOS integration is broken.
Für wen: Vietnamese-speaking audiences who need a native music catalog
Platz 30. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 636.243 Bewertungen
52von 100
iHeart is strong as a radio station aggregator and for accessing broadcasts from across the country, but as a music player it is weak: you cannot choose a specific track, the algorithm mixes genres arbitrarily, and there is no offline mode at all.
Gelobt: You can listen to your favorite local station from anywhere in the country.
Kritik: The catalog works like radio, not a player: no track selection and no queue management.
Für wen: Traditional radio fans who need broadcast access while on the go
Platz 31. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 18.890 Bewertungen
52von 100
An affordable Spotify alternative with playlist import from other services attracts users who need flexibility without the high price. The key problem is unstable playback: shuffle freezes, the queue behaves unpredictably, and this gets in the way of daily use.
Gelobt: The ability to import ready-made playlists from Spotify and other services without manual entry saves hours when switching platforms.
Kritik: Shuffle mode regularly freezes on a few tracks and stops playing instead of cycling through the full collection.
Für wen: Former Spotify users looking for a more affordable replacement while keeping their playlists
Platz 32. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 3.751 Bewertungen
52von 100
Audiomack Creator addresses a real need for independent artists: publish a track and reach an audience without intermediaries. The platform works as a showcase for niche and street sounds, but the technical tools are weak: uploads fail after updates, payouts arrive with major delays, and track metadata editing regularly breaks.
Gelobt: Independent artists can publish music and build an audience without a label and without paying for placement.
Kritik: Release management tools are unstable: reordering tracks in an album is buggy, and uploads periodically stop working after updates.
Für wen: Independent musicians who want to release tracks and find listeners without a label
Platz 33. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.752 Bewertungen
52von 100
A local player with a convenient interface and playlists, but recent updates have broken search and destabilized playback. Basic functionality works, though product degradation is visible in reviews spanning several years of use.
Gelobt: Users value custom playlists with cover art and convenient organization of the local library.
Kritik: Library search periodically fails, and playlists lose their track order on their own.
Für wen: Listeners with their own downloaded collection who do not use streaming
Platz 34. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 3.943 Bewertungen
48von 100
PartyTu fills a real niche: background YouTube playback with custom playlists and no streaming service ads. The product works, but periodically enters a state where all videos go black for several days, track switching takes 30 seconds, and the 300-item playlist limit constrains heavy users.
Gelobt: Background playback of YouTube videos with the ability to sync your playlists, ad-free.
Kritik: Periodically the entire app fails to load videos for several days in a row without explanation.
Für wen: People who listen to music through YouTube playlists with the screen locked
Platz 35. Wert aus Rezensionen: 46 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 1.950 Bewertungen
46von 100
It can download tracks from YouTube and play them offline, which gets the job done, but ads interrupt every action for 20-30 seconds and the downloader periodically stops working and requires a reinstall.
Gelobt: Supports importing files from the phone and YouTube links simultaneously.
Kritik: Search in downloaded tracks works by artist name, not song title.
Für wen: People who want to listen to YouTube tracks offline without a subscription
Platz 36. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 3.280.319 Bewertungen
44von 100
The catalog is broad enough and stream quality is high, but the app suffers from product gaps: shuffle plays the same order every time it starts, adding tracks to playlists consistently breaks after updates, and there is no widget.
Gelobt: High-quality streaming is reliable, and access to audiobooks in the same app is convenient.
Kritik: Shuffle generates the same pseudo-random order on every launch instead of truly random playback.
Für wen: Amazon Prime subscribers who need a background player without extra effort
Platz 37. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 180.767 Bewertungen
44von 100
SoundHound can find songs by humming, which sets it apart from competitors, but degraded recognition accuracy has become a widespread complaint: well-known tracks go unrecognized where Shazam identifies them in five seconds.
Gelobt: Recognizes a song from a hummed melody without words, something Shazam cannot do.
Kritik: Music recognition accuracy has noticeably declined and now falls behind competitors on popular tracks.
Für wen: People who often recall a melody but do not remember the words or artist
Platz 38. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 46.078 Bewertungen
44von 100
Stats.fm was an excellent tool for tracking listening history and comparing tastes with friends, but data accuracy now falls short: missed minutes, incorrect first-listen dates, and broken Apple Music integration. The Soulmates feature, valued by many for connecting with people through music taste, has been removed.
Gelobt: Detailed lifetime listening history broken down by track, artist, and time period.
Kritik: Statistics have become inaccurate: listens disappear, dates shift, and Apple Music sync periodically breaks.
Für wen: Fans who want to track and compare their music history
Platz 39. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 26.655 Bewertungen
44von 100
An app for managing the Denon and Marantz ecosystem that fulfills its role as a multi-room zone controller, but connection instability and integration issues with third-party services like Spotify and Qobuz undermine its core purpose. Users note progress over the years, but basic scenarios still require workarounds.
Gelobt: A single control point for multiple zones and audio sources in the home is genuinely convenient for Denon hardware owners.
Kritik: Stereo pairs and group playback regularly break after a restart, forcing you to reconfigure everything from scratch each time.
Für wen: Owners of Denon or Marantz receivers and speakers
Platz 40. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 5.505 Bewertungen
44von 100
The concept is strong: import playlists from YouTube, background playback, and no ads make Lyra an attractive alternative to paid streaming. But the app systematically substitutes the wrong tracks (plays an AI cover or a completely different song), sessions crash mid-drive, and playlists disappear without warning.
Gelobt: Import a YouTube playlist with one tap and zero ads during playback.
Kritik: Search matching frequently returns the wrong song or an AI cover instead of the original.
Für wen: People who want to listen to YouTube playlists in the background without a subscription
Platz 41. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 1.955 Bewertungen
44von 100
The best player for personal collections on Google Drive: finds and plays files where others fail, but suffers from crashes on track changes, freezes, and periodic loss of the entire library.
Gelobt: The only iOS player that comfortably plays an mp3 collection directly from Google Drive without extra steps.
Kritik: No support for cloud storage services other than Google Drive.
Für wen: Music fans with a personal collection in Google Drive
Platz 42. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 72.688 Bewertungen
42von 100
Musicana found its audience as a replacement for Musi after it left the App Store, but playback is unstable, ads interrupt tracks and prevent controlling the player during display, and the offline storage limit is annoying.
Gelobt: A large catalog via YouTube backend and an interface that makes sense from the first launch.
Kritik: Ads interrupt playback and block the controls while they are showing.
Für wen: Former Musi users looking for a free alternative with a similar concept
Platz 43. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 13.068 Bewertungen
42von 100
Free access to the full YouTube catalog with a customizable equalizer is appealing, but systematic 'No Streams Available' errors make listening unreliable.
Gelobt: The full YouTube catalog plus a real equalizer with a bass boost preset.
Kritik: Playback regularly breaks with a stream error, and the problem does not go away after restarting.
Für wen: Listeners who want YouTube music for free without a streaming subscription
Platz 44. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 7.064 Bewertungen
42von 100
JioSaavn is strong on the Indian catalog and performs reasonably well on the go, but the recommendation algorithm is stuck on the same 30 tracks, CarPlay has serious glitches, and the library is shrinking.
Gelobt: Deep Indian catalog with rare regional-language versions of tracks.
Kritik: The recommendation algorithm cycles through the same 30 songs with no way to break into new music.
Für wen: Listeners of Bollywood and regional Indian music
Platz 45. Wert aus Rezensionen: 41 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 26.424 Bewertungen
41von 100
A unique idea for communal listening with a fan community and a stream counter that found its audience, but aggressively moving previously free features behind a paywall eroded trust among active users. Technical stability problems during live broadcasts make the situation worse.
Gelobt: The radio show format with a live host and a shared chat creates a sense of community around a favorite artist.
Kritik: Music sync is unstable under peak load, and notification delays about the start of broadcasts make them nearly useless.
Für wen: Active fans of specific artists who want to listen to music together with the community
Platz 46. Wert aus Rezensionen: 41 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 2.023 Bewertungen
41von 100
Works as an offline player with a wide catalog and a similar-track recommendation algorithm, but ads are aggressive (1-3 minutes before every action), and the advertised offline mode requires a paid subscription that some users find does not work.
Gelobt: The algorithm adapts to taste and suggests unfamiliar tracks that hit the mark.
Kritik: You cannot delete a single song from a playlist without deleting the entire playlist.
Für wen: People who want to discover new music without a Spotify subscription
Platz 47. Wert aus Rezensionen: 40 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,2★ · 15.968 Bewertungen
40von 100
A utilitarian offline player with Wi-Fi file transfer attracts those who need to listen to their own collection without internet, but adding and removing tracks remains unnecessarily complex. Audio compression on import and instability with large libraries reduce practical value.
Gelobt: Transferring music over Wi-Fi without connecting to a computer works conveniently for small collections up to a few hundred tracks.
Kritik: Audio quality degrades after import: the app appears to reduce bitrate when adding tracks to the library.
Für wen: Users with a small personal collection who need a simple offline player without cloud
Platz 48. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.514.247 Bewertungen
38von 100
A unique catalog thanks to YouTube videos and live recordings, but as a music player the app systematically breaks: the algorithm stopped taking likes and dislikes into account, search periodically fails to find well-known artists, and offline playlists load slowly even for local files.
Gelobt: Access to live performances, covers, and rare recordings not available in traditional catalogs.
Kritik: The recommendation algorithm has stopped learning the listener's taste and mixes genres despite explicit signals.
Für wen: Listeners who need access to YouTube content in a player format
Platz 49. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 182.923 Bewertungen
38von 100
TREBEL built its advantage on offline playback without a subscription, but introducing a daily track limit and storage restrictions made the core value proposition unworkable: users are leaving for the exact reason they came.
Gelobt: Offline playback without internet in dead zones, mountains, and airplanes.
Kritik: The daily listening limit completely breaks the long-drive-without-connectivity scenario.
Für wen: People who listen to music in areas without internet and do not want to pay for streaming
Platz 50. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 62.659 Bewertungen
38von 100
Rockbot solves a narrow problem: voting for music in a cafe or venue, but the venue algorithm regularly ignores submitted requests, and the catalog is noticeably thin across certain genres. The 'DJ level' mechanic and the three-tracks-per-artist limit within 48 hours frustrate those who just want to control the stream.
Gelobt: The feeling that your vote influences what plays in a shared space.
Kritik: The venue algorithm overrides voted tracks, which makes the request mechanic pointless.
Platz 51. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 29.206 Bewertungen
38von 100
Once a beloved radio service with a deep history (Yahoo Radio, Slacker), but a serious overheating and battery drain problem on modern iPhones makes it practically uncomfortable for everyday use. The curated stations still stand out, but the current technical state outweighs that.
Gelobt: Genre and mood curated stations are put together thoughtfully and do not resemble the algorithmic output of competitors.
Kritik: Station personalization has degraded: favorite tracks are pushed out by random recommendations and control over the selection has become significantly worse.
Für wen: Niche genre fans willing to accept the limitations of a radio format
Platz 52. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 6.222 Bewertungen
38von 100
Music TV is positioned as a video player with YouTube integration and works decently for that on a TV, but YouTube playlist import is unstable and the app regularly crashes when working with cached videos.
Gelobt: Convenient music video playback on a large screen via AirPlay or a television.
Kritik: YouTube playlist import does not show all entries and often does not fully sync.
Für wen: People who want to watch music videos on a TV
Platz 53. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 3.948 Bewertungen
38von 100
MyMusic is a simple local mp3 player that handles the basic task with the paid ad-free version. In the free version, banners cover the screen and block controls, the skip button sticks after three presses, and users report the entire device slowing down after installation.
Gelobt: The paid version at a modest price gives a clean player with support for 400+ local mp3 files and no ads.
Kritik: You cannot add a folder of tracks at once, only one file at a time.
Für wen: People who store a large local mp3 collection and are willing to pay to remove ads
Platz 54. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 2.675 Bewertungen
38von 100
The player searches and downloads music from multiple sources, which sets it apart from competitors. Library organization is primitive: no alphabetical sorting, and adding to playlists is cumbersome.
Gelobt: Actually finds and downloads tracks through multiple search engines, including obscure ones.
Kritik: The library has no sorting. Adding tracks to a playlist has to be done one by one.
Für wen: People who need to download specific tracks without subscriptions
Platz 55. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.990 Bewertungen
38von 100
A light, battery-efficient radio app with a simple interface, but most stations do not work, there is no station search, the developer is not updating the app, and HLS is not supported.
Gelobt: Minimal resource use and a fast start set it apart from heavy radio players.
Kritik: There is no station name search, making navigation through the catalog practically impossible.
Für wen: Background radio listeners who want no extra settings
Platz 56. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,1★ · 1.615 Bewertungen
38von 100
The app lets you listen to YouTube music without a separate app, but it has a systemic limitation: music stops when the screen locks, making background playback non-functional for most use cases.
Gelobt: The ability to search and listen to tracks from YouTube directly in the app without downloading is appreciated for its convenience.
Kritik: Playback stops when leaving the app or locking the screen, making walking and background listening impossible.
Für wen: People who only listen to music with the screen on and do not step away from their phone
Platz 57. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 47.850.326 Bewertungen
35von 100
This is a general-purpose video platform, not a music player: there is no dedicated catalog, no music discovery mechanics, and no audio focus. The recommendation algorithm is oriented toward video, not the listener.
Gelobt: A vast library of music videos and concert recordings not available on any music streaming service.
Kritik: Music discovery is built around video, not audio: the algorithm mixes genres and surfaces AI-generated content.
Für wen: Fans of music videos and concert recordings
Platz 58. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 38.697 Bewertungen
35von 100
Melodista offers the core offline player mechanics with playlist support, but metadata editing (track name, artwork, artist) consistently does not save, making library organization nearly impossible. The app has not received noticeable updates and it shows.
Gelobt: Clean playlist organization without extra steps for those who have already downloaded their music.
Kritik: Tag and artwork editing does not save, and this bug has not been fixed for a long time.
Für wen: Users with a ready mp3 collection who do not need to edit tags
Platz 59. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 3,8★ · 9.336 Bewertungen
35von 100
The equalizer concept works, but the app fails to play some tracks, forgets the current position when minimized, and does not pass metadata over Bluetooth. For the price, more is expected.
Gelobt: A full multi-band equalizer with a visualizer for local files.
Kritik: When minimized, the app loses the current track and requires searching again.
Für wen: Music fans with local files who need a powerful equalizer
Platz 60. Wert aus Rezensionen: 34 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 2.534 Bewertungen
34von 100
A blockchain platform for indie artists with an interesting concept but rough execution: track uploads have not worked for years, login hangs, and search plays something other than what you searched for. Listening to others' music is possible, but the catalog is narrow and playback quality is inconsistent.
Gelobt: Displays BPM and key directly on the track card, which DJs appreciate.
Kritik: The catalog contains almost no well-known artists and discovery is nearly absent.
Für wen: Independent artists looking for a SoundCloud alternative
Platz 61. Wert aus Rezensionen: 33 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 29.669 Bewertungen
33von 100
MX Video Player on iOS does not reach the level of its Android version: AirPlay in the paid version transmits audio only without video, there is no window resizing on iPad for large files, and video renaming does not work. Basic video player tasks are handled with caveats.
Gelobt: Support for common formats and organization of a local video library.
Kritik: AirPlay in the paid version transmits audio only, making one of the key features useless.
Für wen: Users who store local video files and do not use AirPlay
Platz 62. Wert aus Rezensionen: 33 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 16.909 Bewertungen
33von 100
A local player for the Iranian audience with radio station support and an offline collection, but recent updates have broken core functions: playlists were deleted, import stopped working, and lock screen controls disappeared. The current state is significantly worse than previous versions.
Gelobt: Before the last update, users valued the simple file import and the convenient lock screen widget.
Kritik: After the major update, playback requires a constant internet connection even for local files, destroying the player's key advantage.
Für wen: Iranian users looking for a convenient player with local radio station support
Platz 63. Wert aus Rezensionen: 32 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 10.876 Bewertungen
32von 100
The idea of AI radio and music generation is interesting, but the model consistently ignores voice gender selection, genre prompts, and does not properly finish tracks. The product has not yet reached a basic level of reliability.
Gelobt: You can try generating music from your own lyrics directly in the free version.
Kritik: Voice settings and genre prompts are regularly ignored by the model and results are unpredictable.
Für wen: Curious users willing to experiment with AI music without guarantees of results
Platz 64. Wert aus Rezensionen: 32 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 5.739 Bewertungen
32von 100
A player with an extensive catalog for finding rare tracks and remixes, but downloads through the HMD section are unreliable: most tracks either do not download or play twice as long as their duration with silence at the end.
Gelobt: You can find obscure remixes and old-school tracks not on Spotify.
Kritik: Downloads through the main HMD search module are unreliable: tracks either do not play or are duplicated with silence.
Für wen: Music fans searching for rare and niche recordings
Platz 65. Wert aus Rezensionen: 32 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 5.560 Bewertungen
32von 100
The app lets you listen to local files from the cloud offline, but the link downloader is broken or locked behind a paid tier, shuffle playback does not work correctly, and tracks quietly add several minutes of silence. The basic player function holds, but everything else is falling apart.
Gelobt: Works without internet and does not show ads during playback.
Kritik: The music link downloader either stops finding files or is blocked without a subscription.
Für wen: People who store files in Dropbox and do not want to stream
Platz 66. Wert aus Rezensionen: 32 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,0★ · 2.543 Bewertungen
32von 100
When it works, it offers a wide catalog and convenient playlists with no switching limits. The offline download feature periodically breaks for months, and users lose accumulated playlists when changing phones.
Gelobt: A large catalog with rare tracks and unlimited track switching without a subscription.
Kritik: Downloaded playlists are not synced to an account and disappear when the device is changed or reset.
Für wen: iPhone users who need a free player with a wide catalog and no Android alternative
Platz 67. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 68.752 Bewertungen
30von 100
Music Player is positioned as a local file player but most users come for streaming and are disappointed: search returns nothing, the catalog is extremely sparse, and many tracks are covered versions instead of originals.
Gelobt: Plays audio files from the device without ads in the player interface.
Kritik: The streaming content catalog is too narrow: most popular tracks and artists are absent.
Für wen: People who need a simple player for their own music files on iPhone
Platz 68. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 57.549 Bewertungen
30von 100
A player app for pre-downloaded mp3 files with no built-in catalog or radio, making it extremely limited compared to competitors. Functionality is basic: import, playback, playlists, but even these operations draw complaints.
Gelobt: Simple organization of personal music without extra screens.
Kritik: There is no built-in catalog or streaming. The app only works with pre-downloaded files.
Für wen: People with an mp3 archive who do not use streaming
Platz 69. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 5.114 Bewertungen
30von 100
Mudify is positioned as a music downloader from archives, but search regularly returns the wrong results, downloads break or get disabled after updates, and the 60-track limit in the free version makes it pointless. Users observe regression year after year.
Gelobt: Offline playback with the screen locked works reliably once tracks are already downloaded.
Kritik: Search does not recognize titles correctly and often returns random content instead of the requested track.
Für wen: People searching for niche tracks not available on streaming services
Platz 70. Wert aus Rezensionen: 29 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 30.675 Bewertungen
29von 100
Discz was built on a swipe-based music discovery mechanic and a social profile, but an update removed profile customization, restricted swipes, and broke posts, destroying the reason people downloaded the app. The product core has degraded to the point where even loyal users describe it as 'dead'.
Gelobt: The swipe-based music discovery idea tied to the real tastes of other users was original.
Kritik: The update removed profile customization and social posts, destroying the primary use case.
Für wen: Nobody in its current state. Previously suited those looking for niche music through community recommendations
Platz 71. Wert aus Rezensionen: 29 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 7.520 Bewertungen
29von 100
A niche archive of anime music with a wide library that held together thanks to a community and chat, but has since degraded: the chat is gone, favorites crash, search does not work on iPhone, and the app has not been updated in three years.
Gelobt: A large collection of anime soundtracks in one place. Many users found rare tracks.
Kritik: The Favorites section crashes on open, making the personal collection inaccessible.
Für wen: Anime fans willing to tolerate technical decay
Platz 72. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 307.698 Bewertungen
28von 100
The app coasts on memory of what it was a few years ago: offline playback, simplicity, zero ads. After a series of updates, music stops playing, tracks disappear from playlists, and a password reset dropped the session mid-code-entry.
Gelobt: Offline playback without internet that used to work flawlessly for years.
Kritik: Core playback reliability is broken: tracks disappear, the player freezes after one or two songs.
Für wen: People who remember the old version and are looking for a replacement
Platz 73. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 4.153 Bewertungen
28von 100
Offline Pro used to save YouTube videos to the device, but the download function is broadly broken after API changes: most recent reviews report errors. Music stops when the screen locks, there is no shuffle, and a previously purchased subscription does not restore after reinstall.
Gelobt: When downloads work, saved files play cleanly without a network connection.
Kritik: There is no shuffle for the downloads list, and playback stops when the screen locks.
Für wen: People who want offline copies of YouTube videos for travel
Platz 74. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,1★ · 3.516 Bewertungen
28von 100
The African and Nigerian music catalog is incomplete and updates with a week or more of delay. Search is unstable: it finds artists but not their tracks.
Gelobt: Rare niche African content not available on other platforms.
Kritik: The catalog updates with significant delay. New albums appear a week after release.
Für wen: Afropop and Nigerian genre listeners who have nowhere else to go
Platz 75. Wert aus Rezensionen: 27 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 5.613 Bewertungen
27von 100
Music X attracts with a large catalog and the promise of offline playback, but ads pop up literally on every tap, YouTube playlists only display 100 of 500 tracks, and after updates the app stops switching tracks automatically.
Gelobt: Wide catalog with YouTube playlist import for those who get a working version.
Kritik: After updates, auto-track-switching breaks and the app needs to be restarted manually after every song.
Für wen: Not recommended to anyone in its current state
Platz 76. Wert aus Rezensionen: 26 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 4.192 Bewertungen
26von 100
The app offers streaming music and music videos, but the shuffle button consistently crashes the app, updates delete all playlist history, and streams regularly buffer or pick the wrong song. Core mechanics are broken and have not been fixed for months.
Gelobt: A large streaming music catalog with the option to watch videos in one interface.
Kritik: After every update all user playlists and history are lost.
Für wen: People who want music videos and music in one free app
Platz 77. Wert aus Rezensionen: 25 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 11.430 Bewertungen
25von 100
The app is positioned as an offline player but does not play music without internet, loses playlists, and caps the library at 20 tracks without watching ads.
Gelobt: The ability to import YouTube videos and listen to them as audio.
Kritik: Offline mode does not work: music stops when the app is minimized.
Für wen: Not recommended until offline mode is fixed
Platz 78. Wert aus Rezensionen: 25 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 5.994 Bewertungen
25von 100
DailyTube claims background playback with the screen off, which draws users in, but tracks often fail to load at all, and the video section is practically empty.
Gelobt: Some users successfully listen to music with the screen locked without a streaming subscription.
Kritik: Search does not find many artists, and video content is almost entirely absent despite the app's name.
Für wen: Spanish-speaking audiences looking for background playback
Platz 79. Wert aus Rezensionen: 24 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 51.630 Bewertungen
24von 100
The app is positioned as a universal media player with YouTube access, but core playback is unreliable: music stops after one or two songs, tracks cut off when the screen dims, and playlists do not persist between sessions. Too rough a product for daily use.
Gelobt: The ability to listen to YouTube music without a separate app.
Kritik: Playback stops on its own after one or two tracks and the app must be restarted each time.
Für wen: People who want to listen to YouTube music without a subscription
Platz 80. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 29.055 Bewertungen
22von 100
An offline player with a simple interface, but the central download function consistently does not work for most users, making the app's existence pointless. An aggressive ad stream finishes off an already weak experience.
Gelobt: Long-time users appreciate the simple navigation and the ability to store video and audio in one place.
Kritik: File downloading has stopped working for most users and does not recover even after reinstall.
Platz 81. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 6.289 Bewertungen
22von 100
An offline player with decent content search, but the app periodically wipes the user's downloaded library entirely, making it an unreliable music store.
Gelobt: Offline playback works for those who managed to download tracks before the wipe.
Kritik: The library and playlists can disappear without warning on app update or restart.
Platz 82. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 4.371 Bewertungen
22von 100
Music X cannot play a playlist in order: instead of the selected song a random one plays, the repeat button is visually present but non-functional, and the screen stays on and drains the battery. Ads cut in after every track. The product is closer to a demo than a working player.
Gelobt: There is an equalizer and basic local file handling on first launch.
Kritik: Playlists play in random order regardless of settings, and the repeat button does not function.
Für wen: Casual users with no requirements for queue management
Platz 83. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 1.837 Bewertungen
22von 100
A YouTube client that most of the time shows a media load error. The issue is systemic and returns after every update. Reliability is so low that paying for a subscription makes no sense.
Gelobt: When it works, it delivers fewer ads than the official YouTube app.
Kritik: Background playback is unstable, and a media load error appears without warning for days at a time.
Platz 84. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,0★ · 15.090 Bewertungen
18von 100
The catalog is thin even for Indian music, audio has no Hi-Fi option, the player freezes and does not switch tracks. A paid subscription does not fix any of these problems.
Gelobt: Users note improved stability compared to earlier versions.
Kritik: The catalog does not cover Western or many Indian artists, and tracks disappear from playlists.
Platz 85. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 8.317 Bewertungen
18von 100
The app calls itself an offline player but systematically requires a network connection to play even downloaded tracks. The core feature is fundamentally broken.
Gelobt: Users who managed to set up offline mode appreciate the simple playlist loading.
Kritik: Offline playback does not work reliably even after downloading tracks.
Platz 86. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 3.960 Bewertungen
18von 100
Musica XM is so overloaded with ads that users report fake virus warnings and 60-second pre-roll ads before every track download. Downloads stop working after updates, tracks cut off mid-play. This is an ad display, not a music player.
Gelobt: In theory it allows downloading tracks for offline listening without an account.
Kritik: Ads block the interface on literally every action: search, adding to playlist, opening a track.
Platz 87. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 3.471 Bewertungen
18von 100
A basic player that does not deliver on its key promise: playing personal music without a network connection. Adding your own files is restricted, and playlist functions break.
Gelobt: The idea of importing music from cloud storage at least partially works.
Kritik: Playlists cannot be assembled from your own tracks without significant restrictions.
Für wen: Not specifically suitable for anyone in its current state
Platz 88. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 3,9★ · 2.244 Bewertungen
18von 100
The app lost its main advantage during a redesign: the old version could play YouTube links offline, the new version handles neither properly. Search is broken, tracks are cut off at 29 seconds.
Gelobt: Some users praise the absence of intrusive ads in the new version.
Kritik: The catalog shrank sharply, shuffle is gone, and offline mode does not work.
Platz 89. Wert aus Rezensionen: 15 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 136.989 Bewertungen
15von 100
MyMixtapez has lost all core features: playlists are deleted after updates, search returns no results, music does not play, and track downloads have been removed. The current version is effectively a non-functional product with a rich history.
Gelobt: It used to be the best source for hip-hop mixtapes with the option to listen offline.
Kritik: Playlists disappear after every major update, and playback does not work in most sessions.
Für wen: Hip-hop and street music fans who have nowhere else to go after the death of DatPiff
Platz 90. Wert aus Rezensionen: 15 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 10.053 Bewertungen
15von 100
This is a dating app through Spotify, not a music player. The real audience has been displaced by scammers and bots who immediately try to move the conversation to Telegram.
Gelobt: The idea of matching by music taste through Spotify is original.
Kritik: The community is full of fake profiles. Finding real users is nearly impossible.
Platz 92. Wert aus Rezensionen: 14 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 1.464 Bewertungen
14von 100
The app effectively does not function as a player: on launch it shows ads, crashes on file import, and plays one track at a time with no transition to the next. The basic task of listening to your own music is not solved.
Gelobt: Some users managed to import files from the cloud and start playback.
Kritik: Listening to tracks in sequence is impossible: the player does not move to the next song and crashes when trying to play an imported file.
Platz 94. Wert aus Rezensionen: 11 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 1.849 Bewertungen
11von 100
The app does not work in any basic sense: search returns nothing, playback does not start, content is absent. Most people who install it delete it within the first few minutes.
Gelobt: Some users managed to find rare film soundtracks through the built-in browser.
Kritik: The player stops when the app is minimized, making background listening impossible.
Für wen: Not recommended
Zu den Bewertungen
Zwei Bewertungen — zwei Quellen
Sie helfen beim Vergleich von Apps, ersetzen aber nicht die Prüfung der eigenen Aufgabe.
Rezensionsbewertung · bis 100
Die gespeicherte Bewertung aus der inApp-Recherche zu den Rezensionstexten. Sie beurteilt die App im Archiv insgesamt, nicht die Zuverlässigkeit einer einzelnen Funktion.
Store-Bewertung · bis 5
Die Bewertung von der App-Seite zum Zeitpunkt der Datenerhebung. Aktuelle Bewertung und Version können abweichen.
In der archivierten Stichprobe dieses Themas: 94 Apps und 24.419 gelesene Rezensionen. Das ist der Gesamtumfang der Recherche, nicht die Zahl der Rezensionen pro App.
Ein Abstand zwischen den Bewertungen beweist keine Manipulation. Das Datum der Berechnung und die vollständige Methodik der Bewertung sind nicht im mobilen Archiv. Vergleich die Aufgabenbeschreibungen und die Originalzitate und prüf die Bedingungen in der aktuellen Version.