A RainDrop author compares the data with his rain gauge. The summary benefits from a source and a period, so that a model estimate is not mixed with a local measurement.
Welche Apps genutzt werden
Diese Apps werden in der Analyse dieser Aufgabe genannt. Öffne jede, um Stärken und Grenzen zu vergleichen. Die Reihenfolge der Liste ist keine Rangliste der Eignung.
Platz 17. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 10.936 Bewertungen
58von 100
The app is valued for its graphical precipitation accuracy and an honest 14-day horizon without extra noise. The hourly forecast periodically breaks and shows only one time slot, making it a useless widget until the next refresh.
Gelobt: Accurate precipitation figures without panic or unnecessary dramatization.
Kritik: The hourly forecast sometimes collapses to a single 1 a.m. row and stops updating without a reinstall.
Für wen: Those planning trips, outdoor work, or farming tasks two weeks out
Platz 40. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 19.566 Bewertungen
44von 100
An app with a unique niche for tracking rainfall for farmers and agronomists, and when the data matches a physical rain gauge it is irreplaceable. But systematically underreporting actual precipitation by 30-40% compared to physical measurements is the key accuracy problem.
Gelobt: Historical precipitation data for a specific map point without needing to go check a physical gauge.
Kritik: Precipitation data regularly underreports physical gauge readings by a third or more.
Für wen: Farmers and agronomists monitoring plot moisture
Platz 15. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 27.805 Bewertungen
58von 100
Tomorrow.io outperforms most competitors on hyperlocal precipitation forecasts tied to exact map coordinates, but the 10-day forecast is unstable, sunrise/sunset times show an offset, and push notifications regularly fail to fire.
Gelobt: Precipitation forecast is tied to precise coordinates rather than the city as a whole, which matters most in areas with complex terrain.
Kritik: The daily and hourly forecasts sometimes contradict each other, which is confusing when planning.
Für wen: Those for whom it matters whether rain will fall here in the next hour
Platz 8. Wert aus Rezensionen: 63 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 12.074 Bewertungen
63von 100
A clean, ad-free interface layered over NWS data, with a forecast discussion forum. Accuracy is good in spring and summer, slightly weaker in winter. The most honest minimalism in the segment.
Gelobt: The NWS forecaster Forecast Discussion is the most informative text forecast available, something no other app offers.
Kritik: Zone and acronym navigation is opaque for newcomers, and switching regions takes extra steps.
Für wen: US users who want raw NWS data without extra layers
Platz 58. Wert aus Rezensionen: 40 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 8.964 Bewertungen
40von 100
Pleasant visuals and hyperlocal forecast for rural areas where the nearest airport station is far away, but accuracy is inconsistent. Radar maps without a legend are nearly useless, and unit settings reset on their own.
Gelobt: Hyperlocal forecast is useful in remote areas where the nearest weather station is 30 miles away.
Kritik: The radar has no color legend, so it is impossible to read precipitation intensity from the map.
Für wen: Farmers and small-town residents in the US Midwest