Note des avis : 84 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 870 notes
84sur 100
The best iOS tracker in this group: Lock Screen Live Activities, Siri shortcuts, widgets, a one-time payment with no subscription, and generous sharing. The only real limitation is iOS-only, so an Android partner cannot join.
Points forts
Lock Screen widgets and Live Activities show the current timer without unlocking the phone.
Reproches
No Android version, so one parent on Android is left out entirely.
Pour qui : iOS families looking for a tracker with no monthly subscription
Note des avis : 78 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 22 495 notes
78sur 100
Nara wins on multi-caregiver mode: grandma, dad, and the nanny all work in one shared log in real time. Recent updates broke the timers, which is frustrating, but the core tracking is solid.
Points forts
Multiple caregivers can see current feeding and sleep status simultaneously without calling each other.
Reproches
After recent updates, feeding and sleep timers periodically freeze or fail to stop.
Pour qui : Families with multiple caregivers who need a live shared log
Note des avis : 74 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 2 644 notes
74sur 100
A reliable free tracker with real multi-device sync that parents use across two or three kids in a row. The main downside is a 5-minute time step instead of exact timestamps, which annoys meticulous loggers.
Points forts
Free multi-device sync that the whole family and nanny actually use.
Reproches
Feeding start time is recorded in 5-minute increments rather than to the second.
Pour qui : Large families and parents who bring in grandparents and nannies
Rang 5. Note des avis : 72 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 24 132 notes
72sur 100
Baby Feed Timer does the main job well: quick logging of breast, bottle, and pump feedings without extra screens. Analytics are minimal, and the shared account with a partner occasionally goes out of sync.
Points forts : One-tap timer start at three in the morning without having to think.
Reproches : Sleep analytics do not separate daytime and nighttime sleep, and history is limited to seven days.
Pour qui : Breastfeeding mothers who need a fast, accurate log with no extras
Rang 6. Note des avis : 72 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 3 230 notes
72sur 100
One of the best all-in-one trackers: covers feeding, sleep, diapers, growth, and temperature, has widgets, and supports multiple caregivers. The main issue in recent months is intrusive ad banners in the free version and Lock Screen widgets disappearing after one of the updates.
Points forts : Lock Screen widgets give instant access to feeding and diaper status without unlocking the phone.
Reproches : After recent updates, Lock Screen widgets stopped working for many users, removing the app's primary convenience.
Pour qui : Couples with multiple caregivers who need a complete log with quick access from any screen
Rang 7. Note des avis : 71 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 5 763 notes
71sur 100
The best dedicated pumping log on the market: timer, daily and weekly volume totals, freezer stock tracking, and reminders all work reliably. The weak spots are occasional crashes that lose a session, plus an inaccurate next-session calculation (it counts from the start of the previous session, not the end).
Points forts : Visual stats covering the entire feeding journey provide motivation to keep pumping even on hard days.
Reproches : The next pumping timer counts from the start of the previous session rather than the end, which skews the actual interval.
Pour qui : Exclusive pumping mothers who need detailed volume analytics
Rang 8. Note des avis : 71 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 932 notes
71sur 100
One of the strongest free trackers with real multi-device sync that grandmas and rotating-shift dads actually use, and pediatric reports help at appointments. Sync occasionally lags by several hours, and ads in the free version can be inappropriate at times.
Points forts : Free core features cover feeding, diapers, sleep, and pumping, syncing data for all caregivers.
Reproches : Sync between devices sometimes falls several hours behind.
Pour qui : Couples doing shift care, especially when grandparents are involved
Rang 9. Note des avis : 70 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 339 notes
70sur 100
Built for a Chinese audience: clean interface, growth curves in place, basic feeding and sleep parameters covered. Sync works for most users, but account registration is blocked outside China, which cuts the audience. Ad lag is annoying.
Points forts : Clear growth curves and a clean interface that is understandable from the first launch.
Reproches : Account registration is unavailable outside China, and shared access does not work for some users.
Pour qui : Chinese-speaking parents looking for a simple visual tracker
Rang 10. Note des avis : 68 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 31 446 notes
68sur 100
One of the most battle-tested trackers: parents use it across multiple kids for years. Multi-device sync is unreliable, and frequent redesigns break familiar navigation paths.
Points forts : Covers the full range: feedings, diapers, sleep, growth, and medical events all in one place without extra screens.
Reproches : Real-time sync between partners regularly falls behind or drops entries.
Pour qui : Couples who need a shared log for two with a history spanning years
Rang 11. Note des avis : 68 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 13 486 notes
68sur 100
One of the most full-featured trackers with a long history: feeding, diapers, temperature, vaccines, and multi-user access. The downside is that entries occasionally disappear and message notifications do not reach some users.
Points forts : Daily summaries and feeding statistics that can be shown to a pediatrician right from the phone.
Reproches : Sync across multiple caregivers is unreliable: messages do not arrive, and there is no permission separation between a parent and a nanny.
Pour qui : Families with multiple caregivers and monthly pediatric visits
Rang 12. Note des avis : 67 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 67 701 notes
67sur 100
The best functional newborn log in this group: predicts the optimal nap window, keeps a detailed feeding and sleep journal, and works across two devices. The main product flaw is that widgets and voice input are locked behind a paywall.
Points forts : The "sweet spot" window predictor genuinely helps catch the right moment before the baby gets overtired.
Reproches : The home screen widget requires a subscription, even though a quick glance at the last feeding time is the main value at three in the morning.
Pour qui : Parents of a newborn who are willing to pay for a smart sleep predictor
Rang 13. Note des avis : 66 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 347 notes
66sur 100
A clean interface, customizable widgets, and a wide set of parameters make Erby comfortable for everyday use. Cases of complete data loss during sync errors undermine trust, but overall users praise stable operation.
Points forts : Customizable home screen widgets reduce the number of taps to a minimum.
Reproches : A sync error can wipe data from both devices at once.
Pour qui : Parents who value a tidy design and widgets
Rang 14. Note des avis : 65 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 719 notes
65sur 100
The app handles basic logging well and offers shared access, but one update broke sync, which is critical for families who had relied on it for years. The Apple Watch widget exists but is unreliable.
Points forts : Real shared access in real time, when everything is working.
Reproches : Timer sync between partners does not work reliably.
Rang 15. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 10 157 notes
62sur 100
Ovia's strength is its ecosystem: users move from a cycle tracker to a pregnancy app to a baby tracker without losing context. Feeding, sleep, and diapers are simple to log, but there is no dark mode, multi-caregiver access is hard to set up, and the last-used breast side occasionally resets.
Points forts : A continuous ecosystem from family planning through infancy, plus a rich article library with age-targeted advice.
Reproches : No dark mode, and the editorial feed surfaces irrelevant tips ahead of schedule, cluttering the screen at three in the morning.
Pour qui : Mothers who already used Ovia during pregnancy
Rang 16. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 2 466 notes
62sur 100
A stable tracker with Apple Watch support and a long reputation among parents on their second or third child, but partner sync breaks, Siri Shortcuts are partially implemented, and the Pro version adds less than it promises.
Points forts : Apple Watch support and pediatric reports that genuinely impress the doctor at an appointment.
Reproches : Shared access for two parents requires a separate purchase for each, and sync periodically breaks.
Pour qui : Tech-savvy parents with an iPhone and Apple Watch
Rang 17. Note des avis : 60 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 7 060 notes
60sur 100
Cubtale offers smart NFC milk tags, a timer from the watch, and flexible per-caregiver customization. But data disappears without warning, the sleep timer resets on its own, and the Watch app stops working after a few days with no notice.
Points forts : A feeding timer right from the Apple Watch and a last-side reminder in total darkness without picking up the phone.
Reproches : Entries disappear without explanation, and in the paid version ads are placed right next to journal buttons, which is especially disruptive at night.
Pour qui : Families with nannies and distributed care who need a shared log
Rang 18. Note des avis : 60 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 470 notes
60sur 100
A beautifully designed tracker with shared access and sleep predictions, but feeding timers regularly freeze or reset and sync between partners is uneven. High potential, stability lets it down.
Points forts : Shared access for both parents with predictions for the next feeding.
Reproches : The feeding timer freezes and switches sides on its own, especially at night.
Rang 19. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 4 083 notes
58sur 100
Napper does its main job well: it predicts the next nap based on past ones and clearly shows total sleep time for the day. Multi-caregiver sync is present. But feeding and diaper logging are secondary, predictions sometimes fail to adjust for the baby's age, and the interface became more confusing after the latest update.
Points forts : Next sleep window prediction based on actual previous sleep time helps plan the day and prevent overtiredness.
Reproches : The algorithm often ignores the baby's age, continuing to recommend 4 naps a day for a baby who has long outgrown that schedule.
Pour qui : Parents who need an accurate sleep tracker with predictions rather than a general-purpose journal
Rang 20. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 7 783 notes
55sur 100
Baby+ by Philips has a clean interface and good coverage: feeding, sleep, diapers, medication, and growth. The weak spot is no dark mode, which is critical for nighttime use, and data occasionally disappears after the app is closed.
Points forts : Medication tracker with reminders and WHO growth percentile comparisons all in one place.
Reproches : No dark mode, and the bright white screen at minimum brightness at three in the morning irritates even the most loyal users.
Pour qui : Solo parents for whom reliable medication and growth logging matters
Rang 21. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 5 038 notes
55sur 100
An all-in-one tracker covering feedings, sleep, diapers, growth, and medications. The main pain point is no real-time device sync, so both parents cannot log simultaneously, plus an awkward time-entry dial that developers keep removing and bringing back.
Points forts : Broad category coverage in one app gives a complete picture of the day without switching between multiple journals.
Reproches : No real-time sync between devices, so two parents cannot keep the log simultaneously.
Pour qui : Families with one primary caregiver who needs a complete offline log
Rang 22. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 1 120 notes
55sur 100
The app covers the full basic set and works across platforms, but after the latest update the sleep timer disappears when the app is closed, and sync between partners lags at critical nighttime moments.
Points forts : Cross-platform: one log works on iPhone, iPad, and Android at the same time.
Reproches : After the update, the sleep timer stops when the app is backgrounded and data is lost.
Pour qui : Mixed iOS-Android families with multiple caregivers
Rang 23. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 487 notes
55sur 100
The app focuses on sleep prediction and scheduling, but the algorithm is inconsistent and sometimes gives recommendations that contradict the baby's actual routine. Basic feeding and diaper tracking is present but shallow.
Points forts : Live Lock Screen widgets for quick logging of sleep start and end.
Reproches : The schedule prediction algorithm does not learn accurately enough from the baby's real data.
Pour qui : Parents who want to build a sleep schedule by the clock
Rang 24. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 227 166 notes
52sur 100
A simple free newborn log with a home screen widget. It does the basic job well enough, but a recent update moved buttons to the top and cleared the bottom for ads, significantly hurting one-handed usability at night.
Points forts : The home screen widget lets you check the last feeding time without opening the app.
Reproches : After the redesign, buttons ended up at the top of the screen, making one-handed use at three in the morning awkward.
Pour qui : Parents who need a free basic log with no extras
Rang 25. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 17 889 notes
52sur 100
Cloud Baby Monitor smartly turns a spare phone or tablet into a baby monitor without buying dedicated hardware. Connection quality is unstable, there is no night vision, and video lag is noticeable.
Points forts : Turn an old iPad into a full baby monitor for free without additional hardware.
Reproches : Video regularly freezes or drops connection, sometimes showing a sleeping baby who has already woken up.
Pour qui : Anyone with a spare Apple device who does not want to buy a separate monitor
Rang 26. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 11 083 notes
52sur 100
Free Apple Watch support sets this app apart from competitors, and logging for a solo user is convenient. But sync between phones is chaotic enough that a couple cannot rely on it, and data can disappear completely.
Points forts : Full Apple Watch control in one hand while the other holds the baby.
Reproches : Sync between devices is locked for 6 hours in the free version and still periodically fails, making shared tracking unreliable.
Pour qui : Breastfeeding mothers logging solo with an Apple Watch
Rang 27. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 4 890 notes
52sur 100
A unique concept with physical buttons at the changing table solves the main tracking-without-a-phone problem, and sync across multiple caregivers works. But frequent auth failures and service outages make the log unreliable exactly when it is needed most.
Points forts : A physical device with buttons at the changing table lets you log feeding and sleep one-handed without touching the phone.
Reproches : The server goes down for several days at a time, and auth errors lock users out of their data at the worst possible moment.
Pour qui : Couples with a shared changing-table station who are willing to buy a physical device
Rang 29. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 23 438 notes
48sur 100
Glow Baby covers all tracking categories and works, but constant pop-up ads for breast pumps ruin the experience even for paying subscribers. Sync between users is unreliable.
Points forts : Everything in one place: feeding, diapers, sleep, and growth, with convenient widgets.
Reproches : Ads for a branded pump pop up in the middle of logging a diaper at four in the morning and cannot be disabled.
Pour qui : Anyone willing to tolerate aggressive cross-promotion in exchange for broad functionality
Rang 30. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 2 889 notes
48sur 100
A minimalist feeding and diaper tracker with no clutter: quick to launch, quick to log. But there is no sync between parents' phones, no next-feeding reminders, no manual duration entry, and the timer sometimes stops in the background. Fine for one caregiver, not for two.
Points forts : Maximum interface simplicity lets you log a feeding one-handed in the dark in two seconds.
Reproches : No device sync, no next-feeding reminders, and no manual duration entry for missed entries.
Pour qui : Solo mothers or families with one primary feeder who need only a feeding log
Rang 31. Note des avis : 45 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 74 388 notes
45sur 100
A well-designed pregnancy tracker with 3D animation, multiple baby-size comparison formats, and weekly videos. The focus is on pregnancy, not the newborn period.
Points forts : Multiple baby-size comparison formats (fruit, animals, desserts) and beautiful 3D models make weekly updates feel like an event.
Reproches : The contraction counter, previously free, is now behind a subscription.
Pour qui : Pregnant women who want an aesthetic weekly development diary
Rang 32. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 120 664 notes
44sur 100
An app for predicting developmental leaps based on the Wonder Weeks book. It gives context for a baby's fussy behavior, but accuracy varies and depends on the individual child.
Points forts : Parents whose babies match the model feel relief: they understand the reason for fussiness in advance.
Reproches : The leap window is vague (plus or minus a week or two), and when it does not match the baby, it feels like money wasted.
Pour qui : Parents who want to explain fussy behavior through a developmental leap model
Rang 33. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 35 370 notes
44sur 100
Nanit is primarily a camera monitor, and sleep tracking is a bonus. Auto-detection of lay-down and wake-up frequently makes mistakes, and audio leaking in the background is annoying.
Points forts : Peace of mind for a new parent: video stream, breathing band, and weekly sleep summaries all in one place.
Reproches : Automatic sleep tracking regularly confuses a brief waking with a full wake-up, and manual corrections change nothing.
Pour qui : Anyone who already bought a Nanit camera and wants sleep insights alongside it
Rang 34. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 13 369 notes
44sur 100
When it works, logging is convenient: feeding, sleep, and diapers on one screen. But the app crashes so regularly that many users describe a daily ritual of deleting and reinstalling it, and one user lost 17 months of data.
Points forts : Deep integration with Hatch smart scales and the changing pad for automatic weight recording.
Reproches : No way to edit or delete entries, and self-starting timers plus data loss when switching phones undermine trust in the log.
Pour qui : Hatch hardware owners who are willing to tolerate instability for the sake of the ecosystem
Rang 35. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 4 096 notes
44sur 100
BabyPage is a digital photo album with prompts and ready-made templates, not a feeding and sleep journal. It works well for milestones and printing a book, but it is not a newborn tracker at all. Frequent crashes with loss of unsaved pages are a serious problem.
Points forts : Ready-made prompts for every stage of the first year let you create a beautiful keepsake book with no design skills.
Reproches : The app crashes while editing pages and loses unsaved changes, making book creation unpredictable.
Pour qui : Parents who want to create a printed photo album of the first year
Rang 36. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 3,6★ · 485 notes
44sur 100
A tracker specifically for breastfeeding mothers with Bluetooth integration for the Lansinoh pump: when the connection is stable, session logging is nearly automatic. But Bluetooth drops, data is lost, and there is no dark mode.
Points forts : Automatic session recording via Bluetooth with no manual entry.
Reproches : Bluetooth connection to the pump drops regularly and data is lost without warning.
Rang 37. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 291 992 notes
42sur 100
One of the best informational pregnancy trackers, with an active community and weekly content. The switch to newborn mode happens automatically with no way to revert, which causes problems with overdue pregnancies.
Points forts : A loyal audience returns for every subsequent pregnancy.
Reproches : The app forcibly switches to newborn mode at exactly 40 weeks, ignoring the actual due date.
Pour qui : First-time mothers during pregnancy, not for newborn logging
Rang 38. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,1★ · 560 notes
42sur 100
This is an ecosystem app for Momcozy breast pumps and monitors, not a general tracker: pumping logging works, but the camera regularly goes offline, notifications are unreliable, and the interface is glitchy. Sleep and diaper tracking are not available.
Points forts : Convenient logging of pumped volume with scheduled reminders.
Reproches : Works only with Momcozy devices; no sleep or diaper tracking.
Pour qui : Owners of a Momcozy breast pump or monitor
Rang 39. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 134 525 notes
38sur 100
A wish-list aggregator for preparing for a baby's arrival: lets you add items from any store into one registry. Gift cards only work in Babylist's own expensive shop, which disappoints gift-givers.
Points forts : Lets you combine wishes from Amazon, Target, and any other store in one place.
Reproches : Babylist gift cards can only be spent in the brand's own store, which has a limited selection at premium prices.
Pour qui : Anyone putting together a gift list before a baby arrives
Rang 40. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 38 474 notes
38sur 100
An informational pregnancy tracker with weekly updates, 3D models, and a community. The built-in feeding timer is buggy: it counts time for both breasts simultaneously and resets when switching sides. The app frequently crashes and logs users out.
Points forts : Weekly size comparisons and daily development facts make pregnancy easier to follow.
Reproches : The breastfeeding timer starts on both sides at once, making the nighttime log unreliable.
Pour qui : Pregnant women who want weekly updates and a community
Rang 41. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 5 947 notes
38sur 100
The app focuses on schedule-based sleep training rather than comprehensive journaling: no proper dark mode, no feeding and diaper screen in one place, and predictions often ignore the baby's individual rhythm. It only works with babies from 12 weeks old, making it useless during the hardest newborn period.
Points forts : Automatically recalculates the day's schedule after each actual sleep, giving a reference point for the next few hours.
Reproches : Does not adapt to the individual baby's rhythm: the same advice for everyone, and recommended wake windows often do not match the real baby.
Pour qui : Parents ready for strict CIO-method sleep training
Rang 42. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 562 notes
38sur 100
A very simple feeding tracker with no account and no cloud: convenient as long as the phone is nearby, but all data is lost when the app is deleted. Internal ads sometimes serve explicit content. Reliability is essentially zero.
Points forts : Extremely simple breastfeeding timer start with no extra steps.
Reproches : No account and no cloud storage: all data disappears on reinstall.
Pour qui : Mothers who need only a feeding timer with nothing else
Rang 43. Note des avis : 35 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 14 041 notes
35sur 100
Mothers love the Elvie pump itself, but the app is weak: it spontaneously changes recorded milk volume after saving, frequently loses connection to the pump, and crashes. At a pump price of $550, this is a real letdown.
Points forts : Remote suction level control from the phone screen without lifting a shirt.
Reproches : The app changes the recorded milk volume on its own, and session data is lost when connection drops.
Pour qui : Elvie pump owners who have accepted the app's instability
Rang 44. Note des avis : 35 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,3★ · 1 993 notes
35sur 100
The app earned loyalty over years across three or four children, but after the Sunflowr redesign it inserted video ads on launch that play out loud during silent nighttime feedings. Data sync between devices is unstable, and lost entries for mothers of premature babies is a critical problem.
Points forts : Simple feeding timer with a side marker, proven over ten years.
Reproches : Video ads play every time the app is opened, including at night during a feeding.
Pour qui : Parents who remember the old version and have not yet found a replacement
Rang 45. Note des avis : 32 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 7 407 notes
32sur 100
Motorola Nursery is a companion for the video monitor, not a standalone feeding and sleep tracker. Video freezes on launch for a significant share of users, and there are no tracking features such as a feeding or diaper journal.
Points forts : Remote camera viewing outside the home via the mobile app when the connection is stable.
Reproches : The video stream regularly fails to load on open, which defeats the main purpose of the monitor.
Pour qui : Motorola camera owners who need only video access
Rang 46. Note des avis : 31 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 376 231 notes
31sur 100
An informational app for pregnant women with a community and weekly updates. The built-in feeding timer is unstable and unsuitable as a reliable newborn log.
Points forts : Detailed weekly updates on fetal development reassure first-time parents.
Reproches : The breastfeeding timer regularly resets and loses data when the app is reopened.
Pour qui : Pregnant women, not parents of a newborn
Rang 47. Note des avis : 30 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 23 639 notes
30sur 100
Sprout is essentially a pregnancy tracker with 3D visualization, not a newborn tracker. For feeding and sleep logging tasks, parents move to other tools.
Points forts : Weekly 3D fetal models give a vivid sense of the baby's growth.
Reproches : No newborn tracking functionality at all: no feedings, no diapers, no sleep.
Pour qui : Expectant parents interested in fetal development visualization during pregnancy
Rang 48. Note des avis : 30 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 1 139 notes
30sur 100
Sprouty positions itself as a developmental milestone tracker with exercises, but basic feeding and sleep logging is hidden behind a subscription, and the content contains factual errors such as claiming a baby starts walking at 7 weeks. Not suitable for nighttime tracking at three in the morning.
Points forts : Weekly development exercises and stage descriptions that ease anxiety for new parents.
Reproches : Factual errors in developmental stage descriptions undermine trust in the medical content.
Pour qui : Parents who care more about a development diary than operational tracking
Rang 49. Note des avis : 29 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 5 066 notes
29sur 100
This is a pregnancy and early parenthood app, not a feeding and sleep tracker: no time-based feeding log, no sleep charts, no diaper reminders. Trying to use it as a newborn journal will fail on the very first night shift.
Points forts : Daily fetal development updates by pregnancy week with cell-level detail, appreciated during the waiting period.
Reproches : Feeding, sleep, and diaper logging are completely absent, meaning the basic functions of a newborn tracker are not implemented.
Pour qui : Pregnant women who want to track fetal development week by week
Rang 51. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 10 009 notes
28sur 100
Amma positions itself as a pregnancy and new-parent community, but ads and subscription pop-ups on literally every tap make logging at three in the morning unbearable. The feeding and sleep tracker functionality is present but drowns in monetization.
Points forts : Clear weekly development summaries covering changes in the body and nutrition.
Reproches : Ads and pop-ups cover tracker buttons on every tap, turning the nighttime log into an obstacle course.
Pour qui : Users who value pregnancy content and can tolerate ads
Rang 52. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 2 829 notes
28sur 100
The app attracts with a clean interface, but it regularly loses feeding and sleep data, and the timer glitches mid-feeding. Shared access for two parents is entirely absent, making it useless for couples.
Points forts : Clean and minimal interface, comfortable for one-handed logging.
Reproches : No device sync between two parents during night shifts.
Pour qui : A solo parent willing to accept lost entries
Rang 53. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 466 notes
28sur 100
A simple interface is appealing, but sync between devices is so unreliable that couples have fed the baby twice due to unsynced entries. Charts crash the app and data disappears. Essentially unworkable as a family tracker.
Points forts : Minimal screen with no extra buttons, working from the very first second.
Reproches : Sync between partners fails so often that entries become unreliable.
Pour qui : Parents who need the most minimalist single-device tracker
Rang 54. Note des avis : 27 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,3★ · 4 813 notes
27sur 100
The idea of Bluetooth sync with a Medela pump is good, but the app's execution does not hold up: constant crashes, unexpected logouts, and lost entries turn a useful tool into a source of stress. Reliability is unacceptably low for a newborn tracker.
Points forts : Automatic Medela pump stop via the app at 29:59, removing the need to watch the timer during a nighttime pumping session.
Reproches : The app regularly logs the user out and loses all entries for the day, with no way to recover them.
Pour qui : Medela Bluetooth pump owners, provided they accept the instability
Rang 56. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 26 076 notes
22sur 100
WeMoms positions itself as a community for pregnant women and new mothers, but ads are so aggressive that reaching the content is nearly impossible. Newborn tracking is secondary here.
Points forts : A lively community of mothers where it is easy to find support and feel less alone.
Reproches : The volume of ads literally blocks navigation through the app.
Pour qui : Those looking for community support rather than strict tracking
Rang 57. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 7 369 notes
22sur 100
The Enfamil Tracker is primarily a loyalty program with basic feeding logging as an add-on. Auth breaks regularly, points fail to appear for weeks, and there is no way to edit entries. Not suitable as a newborn tracker.
Points forts : Feeding and pump tracker in one place with a formula discount program for those already buying it.
Reproches : The app's core function, rewards tracking, only works through a web browser, and the tracker itself cannot edit entries.
Pour qui : Parents buying Enfamil who want to accumulate points with minimal effort
Rang 58. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 1 630 notes
22sur 100
This is a pregnancy tracking app, not a newborn tracker: no feeding, sleep, or diaper logging, and no two-parent sync. It is not relevant for the baby-tracking category.
Points forts : Clear visualization of fetal growth by week with fruit comparisons.
Reproches : Not designed for logging newborn feedings, sleep, or diapers.
Pour qui : Expectant mothers during pregnancy, not parents of a newborn
Rang 60. Note des avis : 18 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 7 462 notes
18sur 100
This is a pregnancy tracking app, not a baby tracker. The main problem is a systematic one-week error in due date calculation that developers have not fixed for years. Not suitable for families with a newborn.
Points forts : Simple and lightweight due date entry with no extra screens.
Reproches : Due date calculation consistently shows a week ahead, unfixed for several years according to reviews.
Pour qui : Pregnant women in early pregnancy who need a minimal app with no baby tracker features
Rang 61. Note des avis : 18 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 978 notes
18sur 100
TimeHut is a family photo album, not a newborn feeding and sleep tracker: no timers, no diaper journal, no reminders. It is not relevant for the baby-tracking category, and uploaded photo and video loss makes it unreliable even in its own niche.
Points forts : A private family album where grandparents can see photos without social media.
Reproches : Uploaded photos and videos periodically disappear with no way to recover them.
Pour qui : Families spread across different cities who want to share photos
À propos des chiffres
Deux chiffres — deux sources
Elles aident à comparer les apps, mais ne remplacent pas la vérification de ta propre tâche.
Score des avis · jusqu’à 100
Le score conservé de l’étude inApp sur les textes des avis. Il évalue l’ensemble de l’app dans l’archive, pas la fiabilité d’une fonction précise.
Note de la boutique · jusqu’à 5
La note de la page de l’app au moment de la collecte. La note et la version actuelles peuvent différer.
Dans l’échantillon archivé de ce sujet : 61 apps et 17 486 avis lus. C’est le volume total de l’étude, pas le nombre d’avis par app.
Un écart entre les chiffres ne prouve pas de manipulation. La date de calcul et la méthode complète du score ne sont pas dans l’archive mobile. Compare les descriptions des tâches et les citations sources, et vérifie les conditions dans la version actuelle.