Wert aus Rezensionen: 84 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 870 Bewertungen
84von 100
The best iOS tracker in this group: Lock Screen Live Activities, Siri shortcuts, widgets, a one-time payment with no subscription, and generous sharing. The only real limitation is iOS-only, so an Android partner cannot join.
Gelobt
Lock Screen widgets and Live Activities show the current timer without unlocking the phone.
Kritik
No Android version, so one parent on Android is left out entirely.
Für wen: iOS families looking for a tracker with no monthly subscription
Wert aus Rezensionen: 78 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 22.495 Bewertungen
78von 100
Nara wins on multi-caregiver mode: grandma, dad, and the nanny all work in one shared log in real time. Recent updates broke the timers, which is frustrating, but the core tracking is solid.
Gelobt
Multiple caregivers can see current feeding and sleep status simultaneously without calling each other.
Kritik
After recent updates, feeding and sleep timers periodically freeze or fail to stop.
Für wen: Families with multiple caregivers who need a live shared log
Wert aus Rezensionen: 74 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 2.644 Bewertungen
74von 100
A reliable free tracker with real multi-device sync that parents use across two or three kids in a row. The main downside is a 5-minute time step instead of exact timestamps, which annoys meticulous loggers.
Gelobt
Free multi-device sync that the whole family and nanny actually use.
Kritik
Feeding start time is recorded in 5-minute increments rather than to the second.
Für wen: Large families and parents who bring in grandparents and nannies
Platz 5. Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 24.132 Bewertungen
72von 100
Baby Feed Timer does the main job well: quick logging of breast, bottle, and pump feedings without extra screens. Analytics are minimal, and the shared account with a partner occasionally goes out of sync.
Gelobt: One-tap timer start at three in the morning without having to think.
Kritik: Sleep analytics do not separate daytime and nighttime sleep, and history is limited to seven days.
Für wen: Breastfeeding mothers who need a fast, accurate log with no extras
Platz 6. Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 3.230 Bewertungen
72von 100
One of the best all-in-one trackers: covers feeding, sleep, diapers, growth, and temperature, has widgets, and supports multiple caregivers. The main issue in recent months is intrusive ad banners in the free version and Lock Screen widgets disappearing after one of the updates.
Gelobt: Lock Screen widgets give instant access to feeding and diaper status without unlocking the phone.
Kritik: After recent updates, Lock Screen widgets stopped working for many users, removing the app's primary convenience.
Für wen: Couples with multiple caregivers who need a complete log with quick access from any screen
Platz 7. Wert aus Rezensionen: 71 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 5.763 Bewertungen
71von 100
The best dedicated pumping log on the market: timer, daily and weekly volume totals, freezer stock tracking, and reminders all work reliably. The weak spots are occasional crashes that lose a session, plus an inaccurate next-session calculation (it counts from the start of the previous session, not the end).
Gelobt: Visual stats covering the entire feeding journey provide motivation to keep pumping even on hard days.
Kritik: The next pumping timer counts from the start of the previous session rather than the end, which skews the actual interval.
Für wen: Exclusive pumping mothers who need detailed volume analytics
Platz 8. Wert aus Rezensionen: 71 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 932 Bewertungen
71von 100
One of the strongest free trackers with real multi-device sync that grandmas and rotating-shift dads actually use, and pediatric reports help at appointments. Sync occasionally lags by several hours, and ads in the free version can be inappropriate at times.
Gelobt: Free core features cover feeding, diapers, sleep, and pumping, syncing data for all caregivers.
Kritik: Sync between devices sometimes falls several hours behind.
Für wen: Couples doing shift care, especially when grandparents are involved
Platz 9. Wert aus Rezensionen: 70 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 339 Bewertungen
70von 100
Built for a Chinese audience: clean interface, growth curves in place, basic feeding and sleep parameters covered. Sync works for most users, but account registration is blocked outside China, which cuts the audience. Ad lag is annoying.
Gelobt: Clear growth curves and a clean interface that is understandable from the first launch.
Kritik: Account registration is unavailable outside China, and shared access does not work for some users.
Für wen: Chinese-speaking parents looking for a simple visual tracker
Platz 10. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 31.446 Bewertungen
68von 100
One of the most battle-tested trackers: parents use it across multiple kids for years. Multi-device sync is unreliable, and frequent redesigns break familiar navigation paths.
Gelobt: Covers the full range: feedings, diapers, sleep, growth, and medical events all in one place without extra screens.
Kritik: Real-time sync between partners regularly falls behind or drops entries.
Für wen: Couples who need a shared log for two with a history spanning years
Platz 11. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 13.486 Bewertungen
68von 100
One of the most full-featured trackers with a long history: feeding, diapers, temperature, vaccines, and multi-user access. The downside is that entries occasionally disappear and message notifications do not reach some users.
Gelobt: Daily summaries and feeding statistics that can be shown to a pediatrician right from the phone.
Kritik: Sync across multiple caregivers is unreliable: messages do not arrive, and there is no permission separation between a parent and a nanny.
Für wen: Families with multiple caregivers and monthly pediatric visits
Platz 12. Wert aus Rezensionen: 67 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 67.701 Bewertungen
67von 100
The best functional newborn log in this group: predicts the optimal nap window, keeps a detailed feeding and sleep journal, and works across two devices. The main product flaw is that widgets and voice input are locked behind a paywall.
Gelobt: The "sweet spot" window predictor genuinely helps catch the right moment before the baby gets overtired.
Kritik: The home screen widget requires a subscription, even though a quick glance at the last feeding time is the main value at three in the morning.
Für wen: Parents of a newborn who are willing to pay for a smart sleep predictor
Platz 13. Wert aus Rezensionen: 66 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 347 Bewertungen
66von 100
A clean interface, customizable widgets, and a wide set of parameters make Erby comfortable for everyday use. Cases of complete data loss during sync errors undermine trust, but overall users praise stable operation.
Gelobt: Customizable home screen widgets reduce the number of taps to a minimum.
Kritik: A sync error can wipe data from both devices at once.
Für wen: Parents who value a tidy design and widgets
Platz 14. Wert aus Rezensionen: 65 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 719 Bewertungen
65von 100
The app handles basic logging well and offers shared access, but one update broke sync, which is critical for families who had relied on it for years. The Apple Watch widget exists but is unreliable.
Gelobt: Real shared access in real time, when everything is working.
Kritik: Timer sync between partners does not work reliably.
Platz 15. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 10.157 Bewertungen
62von 100
Ovia's strength is its ecosystem: users move from a cycle tracker to a pregnancy app to a baby tracker without losing context. Feeding, sleep, and diapers are simple to log, but there is no dark mode, multi-caregiver access is hard to set up, and the last-used breast side occasionally resets.
Gelobt: A continuous ecosystem from family planning through infancy, plus a rich article library with age-targeted advice.
Kritik: No dark mode, and the editorial feed surfaces irrelevant tips ahead of schedule, cluttering the screen at three in the morning.
Für wen: Mothers who already used Ovia during pregnancy
Platz 16. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 2.466 Bewertungen
62von 100
A stable tracker with Apple Watch support and a long reputation among parents on their second or third child, but partner sync breaks, Siri Shortcuts are partially implemented, and the Pro version adds less than it promises.
Gelobt: Apple Watch support and pediatric reports that genuinely impress the doctor at an appointment.
Kritik: Shared access for two parents requires a separate purchase for each, and sync periodically breaks.
Für wen: Tech-savvy parents with an iPhone and Apple Watch
Platz 17. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 7.060 Bewertungen
60von 100
Cubtale offers smart NFC milk tags, a timer from the watch, and flexible per-caregiver customization. But data disappears without warning, the sleep timer resets on its own, and the Watch app stops working after a few days with no notice.
Gelobt: A feeding timer right from the Apple Watch and a last-side reminder in total darkness without picking up the phone.
Kritik: Entries disappear without explanation, and in the paid version ads are placed right next to journal buttons, which is especially disruptive at night.
Für wen: Families with nannies and distributed care who need a shared log
Platz 18. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 470 Bewertungen
60von 100
A beautifully designed tracker with shared access and sleep predictions, but feeding timers regularly freeze or reset and sync between partners is uneven. High potential, stability lets it down.
Gelobt: Shared access for both parents with predictions for the next feeding.
Kritik: The feeding timer freezes and switches sides on its own, especially at night.
Platz 19. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 4.083 Bewertungen
58von 100
Napper does its main job well: it predicts the next nap based on past ones and clearly shows total sleep time for the day. Multi-caregiver sync is present. But feeding and diaper logging are secondary, predictions sometimes fail to adjust for the baby's age, and the interface became more confusing after the latest update.
Gelobt: Next sleep window prediction based on actual previous sleep time helps plan the day and prevent overtiredness.
Kritik: The algorithm often ignores the baby's age, continuing to recommend 4 naps a day for a baby who has long outgrown that schedule.
Für wen: Parents who need an accurate sleep tracker with predictions rather than a general-purpose journal
Platz 20. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 7.783 Bewertungen
55von 100
Baby+ by Philips has a clean interface and good coverage: feeding, sleep, diapers, medication, and growth. The weak spot is no dark mode, which is critical for nighttime use, and data occasionally disappears after the app is closed.
Gelobt: Medication tracker with reminders and WHO growth percentile comparisons all in one place.
Kritik: No dark mode, and the bright white screen at minimum brightness at three in the morning irritates even the most loyal users.
Für wen: Solo parents for whom reliable medication and growth logging matters
Platz 21. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 5.038 Bewertungen
55von 100
An all-in-one tracker covering feedings, sleep, diapers, growth, and medications. The main pain point is no real-time device sync, so both parents cannot log simultaneously, plus an awkward time-entry dial that developers keep removing and bringing back.
Gelobt: Broad category coverage in one app gives a complete picture of the day without switching between multiple journals.
Kritik: No real-time sync between devices, so two parents cannot keep the log simultaneously.
Für wen: Families with one primary caregiver who needs a complete offline log
Platz 22. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.120 Bewertungen
55von 100
The app covers the full basic set and works across platforms, but after the latest update the sleep timer disappears when the app is closed, and sync between partners lags at critical nighttime moments.
Gelobt: Cross-platform: one log works on iPhone, iPad, and Android at the same time.
Kritik: After the update, the sleep timer stops when the app is backgrounded and data is lost.
Für wen: Mixed iOS-Android families with multiple caregivers
Platz 23. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 487 Bewertungen
55von 100
The app focuses on sleep prediction and scheduling, but the algorithm is inconsistent and sometimes gives recommendations that contradict the baby's actual routine. Basic feeding and diaper tracking is present but shallow.
Gelobt: Live Lock Screen widgets for quick logging of sleep start and end.
Kritik: The schedule prediction algorithm does not learn accurately enough from the baby's real data.
Für wen: Parents who want to build a sleep schedule by the clock
Platz 24. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 227.166 Bewertungen
52von 100
A simple free newborn log with a home screen widget. It does the basic job well enough, but a recent update moved buttons to the top and cleared the bottom for ads, significantly hurting one-handed usability at night.
Gelobt: The home screen widget lets you check the last feeding time without opening the app.
Kritik: After the redesign, buttons ended up at the top of the screen, making one-handed use at three in the morning awkward.
Für wen: Parents who need a free basic log with no extras
Platz 25. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 17.889 Bewertungen
52von 100
Cloud Baby Monitor smartly turns a spare phone or tablet into a baby monitor without buying dedicated hardware. Connection quality is unstable, there is no night vision, and video lag is noticeable.
Gelobt: Turn an old iPad into a full baby monitor for free without additional hardware.
Kritik: Video regularly freezes or drops connection, sometimes showing a sleeping baby who has already woken up.
Für wen: Anyone with a spare Apple device who does not want to buy a separate monitor
Platz 26. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 11.083 Bewertungen
52von 100
Free Apple Watch support sets this app apart from competitors, and logging for a solo user is convenient. But sync between phones is chaotic enough that a couple cannot rely on it, and data can disappear completely.
Gelobt: Full Apple Watch control in one hand while the other holds the baby.
Kritik: Sync between devices is locked for 6 hours in the free version and still periodically fails, making shared tracking unreliable.
Für wen: Breastfeeding mothers logging solo with an Apple Watch
Platz 27. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 4.890 Bewertungen
52von 100
A unique concept with physical buttons at the changing table solves the main tracking-without-a-phone problem, and sync across multiple caregivers works. But frequent auth failures and service outages make the log unreliable exactly when it is needed most.
Gelobt: A physical device with buttons at the changing table lets you log feeding and sleep one-handed without touching the phone.
Kritik: The server goes down for several days at a time, and auth errors lock users out of their data at the worst possible moment.
Für wen: Couples with a shared changing-table station who are willing to buy a physical device
Platz 29. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 23.438 Bewertungen
48von 100
Glow Baby covers all tracking categories and works, but constant pop-up ads for breast pumps ruin the experience even for paying subscribers. Sync between users is unreliable.
Gelobt: Everything in one place: feeding, diapers, sleep, and growth, with convenient widgets.
Kritik: Ads for a branded pump pop up in the middle of logging a diaper at four in the morning and cannot be disabled.
Für wen: Anyone willing to tolerate aggressive cross-promotion in exchange for broad functionality
Platz 30. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 2.889 Bewertungen
48von 100
A minimalist feeding and diaper tracker with no clutter: quick to launch, quick to log. But there is no sync between parents' phones, no next-feeding reminders, no manual duration entry, and the timer sometimes stops in the background. Fine for one caregiver, not for two.
Gelobt: Maximum interface simplicity lets you log a feeding one-handed in the dark in two seconds.
Kritik: No device sync, no next-feeding reminders, and no manual duration entry for missed entries.
Für wen: Solo mothers or families with one primary feeder who need only a feeding log
Platz 31. Wert aus Rezensionen: 45 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 74.388 Bewertungen
45von 100
A well-designed pregnancy tracker with 3D animation, multiple baby-size comparison formats, and weekly videos. The focus is on pregnancy, not the newborn period.
Gelobt: Multiple baby-size comparison formats (fruit, animals, desserts) and beautiful 3D models make weekly updates feel like an event.
Kritik: The contraction counter, previously free, is now behind a subscription.
Für wen: Pregnant women who want an aesthetic weekly development diary
Platz 32. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 120.664 Bewertungen
44von 100
An app for predicting developmental leaps based on the Wonder Weeks book. It gives context for a baby's fussy behavior, but accuracy varies and depends on the individual child.
Gelobt: Parents whose babies match the model feel relief: they understand the reason for fussiness in advance.
Kritik: The leap window is vague (plus or minus a week or two), and when it does not match the baby, it feels like money wasted.
Für wen: Parents who want to explain fussy behavior through a developmental leap model
Platz 33. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 35.370 Bewertungen
44von 100
Nanit is primarily a camera monitor, and sleep tracking is a bonus. Auto-detection of lay-down and wake-up frequently makes mistakes, and audio leaking in the background is annoying.
Gelobt: Peace of mind for a new parent: video stream, breathing band, and weekly sleep summaries all in one place.
Kritik: Automatic sleep tracking regularly confuses a brief waking with a full wake-up, and manual corrections change nothing.
Für wen: Anyone who already bought a Nanit camera and wants sleep insights alongside it
Platz 34. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 13.369 Bewertungen
44von 100
When it works, logging is convenient: feeding, sleep, and diapers on one screen. But the app crashes so regularly that many users describe a daily ritual of deleting and reinstalling it, and one user lost 17 months of data.
Gelobt: Deep integration with Hatch smart scales and the changing pad for automatic weight recording.
Kritik: No way to edit or delete entries, and self-starting timers plus data loss when switching phones undermine trust in the log.
Für wen: Hatch hardware owners who are willing to tolerate instability for the sake of the ecosystem
Platz 35. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 4.096 Bewertungen
44von 100
BabyPage is a digital photo album with prompts and ready-made templates, not a feeding and sleep journal. It works well for milestones and printing a book, but it is not a newborn tracker at all. Frequent crashes with loss of unsaved pages are a serious problem.
Gelobt: Ready-made prompts for every stage of the first year let you create a beautiful keepsake book with no design skills.
Kritik: The app crashes while editing pages and loses unsaved changes, making book creation unpredictable.
Für wen: Parents who want to create a printed photo album of the first year
Platz 36. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 3,6★ · 485 Bewertungen
44von 100
A tracker specifically for breastfeeding mothers with Bluetooth integration for the Lansinoh pump: when the connection is stable, session logging is nearly automatic. But Bluetooth drops, data is lost, and there is no dark mode.
Gelobt: Automatic session recording via Bluetooth with no manual entry.
Kritik: Bluetooth connection to the pump drops regularly and data is lost without warning.
Platz 37. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 291.992 Bewertungen
42von 100
One of the best informational pregnancy trackers, with an active community and weekly content. The switch to newborn mode happens automatically with no way to revert, which causes problems with overdue pregnancies.
Gelobt: A loyal audience returns for every subsequent pregnancy.
Kritik: The app forcibly switches to newborn mode at exactly 40 weeks, ignoring the actual due date.
Für wen: First-time mothers during pregnancy, not for newborn logging
Platz 38. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,1★ · 560 Bewertungen
42von 100
This is an ecosystem app for Momcozy breast pumps and monitors, not a general tracker: pumping logging works, but the camera regularly goes offline, notifications are unreliable, and the interface is glitchy. Sleep and diaper tracking are not available.
Gelobt: Convenient logging of pumped volume with scheduled reminders.
Kritik: Works only with Momcozy devices; no sleep or diaper tracking.
Für wen: Owners of a Momcozy breast pump or monitor
Platz 39. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 134.525 Bewertungen
38von 100
A wish-list aggregator for preparing for a baby's arrival: lets you add items from any store into one registry. Gift cards only work in Babylist's own expensive shop, which disappoints gift-givers.
Gelobt: Lets you combine wishes from Amazon, Target, and any other store in one place.
Kritik: Babylist gift cards can only be spent in the brand's own store, which has a limited selection at premium prices.
Für wen: Anyone putting together a gift list before a baby arrives
Platz 40. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 38.474 Bewertungen
38von 100
An informational pregnancy tracker with weekly updates, 3D models, and a community. The built-in feeding timer is buggy: it counts time for both breasts simultaneously and resets when switching sides. The app frequently crashes and logs users out.
Gelobt: Weekly size comparisons and daily development facts make pregnancy easier to follow.
Kritik: The breastfeeding timer starts on both sides at once, making the nighttime log unreliable.
Für wen: Pregnant women who want weekly updates and a community
Platz 41. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 5.947 Bewertungen
38von 100
The app focuses on schedule-based sleep training rather than comprehensive journaling: no proper dark mode, no feeding and diaper screen in one place, and predictions often ignore the baby's individual rhythm. It only works with babies from 12 weeks old, making it useless during the hardest newborn period.
Gelobt: Automatically recalculates the day's schedule after each actual sleep, giving a reference point for the next few hours.
Kritik: Does not adapt to the individual baby's rhythm: the same advice for everyone, and recommended wake windows often do not match the real baby.
Für wen: Parents ready for strict CIO-method sleep training
Platz 42. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 562 Bewertungen
38von 100
A very simple feeding tracker with no account and no cloud: convenient as long as the phone is nearby, but all data is lost when the app is deleted. Internal ads sometimes serve explicit content. Reliability is essentially zero.
Gelobt: Extremely simple breastfeeding timer start with no extra steps.
Kritik: No account and no cloud storage: all data disappears on reinstall.
Für wen: Mothers who need only a feeding timer with nothing else
Platz 43. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 14.041 Bewertungen
35von 100
Mothers love the Elvie pump itself, but the app is weak: it spontaneously changes recorded milk volume after saving, frequently loses connection to the pump, and crashes. At a pump price of $550, this is a real letdown.
Gelobt: Remote suction level control from the phone screen without lifting a shirt.
Kritik: The app changes the recorded milk volume on its own, and session data is lost when connection drops.
Für wen: Elvie pump owners who have accepted the app's instability
Platz 44. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 1.993 Bewertungen
35von 100
The app earned loyalty over years across three or four children, but after the Sunflowr redesign it inserted video ads on launch that play out loud during silent nighttime feedings. Data sync between devices is unstable, and lost entries for mothers of premature babies is a critical problem.
Gelobt: Simple feeding timer with a side marker, proven over ten years.
Kritik: Video ads play every time the app is opened, including at night during a feeding.
Für wen: Parents who remember the old version and have not yet found a replacement
Platz 45. Wert aus Rezensionen: 32 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 7.407 Bewertungen
32von 100
Motorola Nursery is a companion for the video monitor, not a standalone feeding and sleep tracker. Video freezes on launch for a significant share of users, and there are no tracking features such as a feeding or diaper journal.
Gelobt: Remote camera viewing outside the home via the mobile app when the connection is stable.
Kritik: The video stream regularly fails to load on open, which defeats the main purpose of the monitor.
Für wen: Motorola camera owners who need only video access
Platz 46. Wert aus Rezensionen: 31 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 376.231 Bewertungen
31von 100
An informational app for pregnant women with a community and weekly updates. The built-in feeding timer is unstable and unsuitable as a reliable newborn log.
Gelobt: Detailed weekly updates on fetal development reassure first-time parents.
Kritik: The breastfeeding timer regularly resets and loses data when the app is reopened.
Platz 47. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 23.639 Bewertungen
30von 100
Sprout is essentially a pregnancy tracker with 3D visualization, not a newborn tracker. For feeding and sleep logging tasks, parents move to other tools.
Gelobt: Weekly 3D fetal models give a vivid sense of the baby's growth.
Kritik: No newborn tracking functionality at all: no feedings, no diapers, no sleep.
Für wen: Expectant parents interested in fetal development visualization during pregnancy
Platz 48. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.139 Bewertungen
30von 100
Sprouty positions itself as a developmental milestone tracker with exercises, but basic feeding and sleep logging is hidden behind a subscription, and the content contains factual errors such as claiming a baby starts walking at 7 weeks. Not suitable for nighttime tracking at three in the morning.
Gelobt: Weekly development exercises and stage descriptions that ease anxiety for new parents.
Kritik: Factual errors in developmental stage descriptions undermine trust in the medical content.
Für wen: Parents who care more about a development diary than operational tracking
Platz 49. Wert aus Rezensionen: 29 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 5.066 Bewertungen
29von 100
This is a pregnancy and early parenthood app, not a feeding and sleep tracker: no time-based feeding log, no sleep charts, no diaper reminders. Trying to use it as a newborn journal will fail on the very first night shift.
Gelobt: Daily fetal development updates by pregnancy week with cell-level detail, appreciated during the waiting period.
Kritik: Feeding, sleep, and diaper logging are completely absent, meaning the basic functions of a newborn tracker are not implemented.
Für wen: Pregnant women who want to track fetal development week by week
Platz 51. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 10.009 Bewertungen
28von 100
Amma positions itself as a pregnancy and new-parent community, but ads and subscription pop-ups on literally every tap make logging at three in the morning unbearable. The feeding and sleep tracker functionality is present but drowns in monetization.
Gelobt: Clear weekly development summaries covering changes in the body and nutrition.
Kritik: Ads and pop-ups cover tracker buttons on every tap, turning the nighttime log into an obstacle course.
Für wen: Users who value pregnancy content and can tolerate ads
Platz 52. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 2.829 Bewertungen
28von 100
The app attracts with a clean interface, but it regularly loses feeding and sleep data, and the timer glitches mid-feeding. Shared access for two parents is entirely absent, making it useless for couples.
Gelobt: Clean and minimal interface, comfortable for one-handed logging.
Kritik: No device sync between two parents during night shifts.
Für wen: A solo parent willing to accept lost entries
Platz 53. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 466 Bewertungen
28von 100
A simple interface is appealing, but sync between devices is so unreliable that couples have fed the baby twice due to unsynced entries. Charts crash the app and data disappears. Essentially unworkable as a family tracker.
Gelobt: Minimal screen with no extra buttons, working from the very first second.
Kritik: Sync between partners fails so often that entries become unreliable.
Für wen: Parents who need the most minimalist single-device tracker
Platz 54. Wert aus Rezensionen: 27 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 4.813 Bewertungen
27von 100
The idea of Bluetooth sync with a Medela pump is good, but the app's execution does not hold up: constant crashes, unexpected logouts, and lost entries turn a useful tool into a source of stress. Reliability is unacceptably low for a newborn tracker.
Gelobt: Automatic Medela pump stop via the app at 29:59, removing the need to watch the timer during a nighttime pumping session.
Kritik: The app regularly logs the user out and loses all entries for the day, with no way to recover them.
Für wen: Medela Bluetooth pump owners, provided they accept the instability
Platz 56. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 26.076 Bewertungen
22von 100
WeMoms positions itself as a community for pregnant women and new mothers, but ads are so aggressive that reaching the content is nearly impossible. Newborn tracking is secondary here.
Gelobt: A lively community of mothers where it is easy to find support and feel less alone.
Kritik: The volume of ads literally blocks navigation through the app.
Für wen: Those looking for community support rather than strict tracking
Platz 57. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 7.369 Bewertungen
22von 100
The Enfamil Tracker is primarily a loyalty program with basic feeding logging as an add-on. Auth breaks regularly, points fail to appear for weeks, and there is no way to edit entries. Not suitable as a newborn tracker.
Gelobt: Feeding and pump tracker in one place with a formula discount program for those already buying it.
Kritik: The app's core function, rewards tracking, only works through a web browser, and the tracker itself cannot edit entries.
Für wen: Parents buying Enfamil who want to accumulate points with minimal effort
Platz 58. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 1.630 Bewertungen
22von 100
This is a pregnancy tracking app, not a newborn tracker: no feeding, sleep, or diaper logging, and no two-parent sync. It is not relevant for the baby-tracking category.
Gelobt: Clear visualization of fetal growth by week with fruit comparisons.
Kritik: Not designed for logging newborn feedings, sleep, or diapers.
Für wen: Expectant mothers during pregnancy, not parents of a newborn
Platz 60. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 7.462 Bewertungen
18von 100
This is a pregnancy tracking app, not a baby tracker. The main problem is a systematic one-week error in due date calculation that developers have not fixed for years. Not suitable for families with a newborn.
Gelobt: Simple and lightweight due date entry with no extra screens.
Kritik: Due date calculation consistently shows a week ahead, unfixed for several years according to reviews.
Für wen: Pregnant women in early pregnancy who need a minimal app with no baby tracker features
Platz 61. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 978 Bewertungen
18von 100
TimeHut is a family photo album, not a newborn feeding and sleep tracker: no timers, no diaper journal, no reminders. It is not relevant for the baby-tracking category, and uploaded photo and video loss makes it unreliable even in its own niche.
Gelobt: A private family album where grandparents can see photos without social media.
Kritik: Uploaded photos and videos periodically disappear with no way to recover them.
Für wen: Families spread across different cities who want to share photos
Zu den Bewertungen
Zwei Bewertungen — zwei Quellen
Sie helfen beim Vergleich von Apps, ersetzen aber nicht die Prüfung der eigenen Aufgabe.
Rezensionsbewertung · bis 100
Die gespeicherte Bewertung aus der inApp-Recherche zu den Rezensionstexten. Sie beurteilt die App im Archiv insgesamt, nicht die Zuverlässigkeit einer einzelnen Funktion.
Store-Bewertung · bis 5
Die Bewertung von der App-Seite zum Zeitpunkt der Datenerhebung. Aktuelle Bewertung und Version können abweichen.
In der archivierten Stichprobe dieses Themas: 61 Apps und 17.486 gelesene Rezensionen. Das ist der Gesamtumfang der Recherche, nicht die Zahl der Rezensionen pro App.
Ein Abstand zwischen den Bewertungen beweist keine Manipulation. Das Datum der Berechnung und die vollständige Methodik der Bewertung sind nicht im mobilen Archiv. Vergleich die Aufgabenbeschreibungen und die Originalzitate und prüf die Bedingungen in der aktuellen Version.