Note des avis : 88 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 344 notes
88sur 100
The only dedicated PMDD tracker with European data storage jurisdiction. Helps document symptoms for diagnosis and conversations with your doctor. You cannot edit the symptom log once the day is closed.
Points forts
Specialized PMDD tracking with dedicated tools for working through symptoms as they happen, not just logging them. European data jurisdiction is especially valued in this category. Provides science-backed information on hormones and explains the connection to symptoms.
Reproches
You cannot edit symptom entries after closing the day, so correcting past data is impossible. Daily goal settings cannot be saved as a template and must be re-entered each time. The symptom list is fixed with no option to add custom categories.
Pour qui : Women diagnosed with PMDD or suspected to have it, and those who have come off hormonal contraceptives and want to understand their cycle deeply. Not for those who only need a period date prediction.
Note des avis : 82 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 170 353 notes
82sur 100
One of the few major trackers that genuinely handles irregular cycles: it adjusts the forecast as new data comes in and works with PCOS and post-surgery changes. Long-term cycle history stays stable.
Points forts
Works with PCOS and irregular cycles: the forecast adapts to symptoms and stress rather than just averaging past data. Detailed log covering symptoms, mood, sleep, and weight. Full pregnancy mode with a smooth transition that preserves history.
Reproches
Data transfer when switching devices raises concerns for some users, with documented cases of lost history. Tag search in the journal does not work. Data from older entries sometimes syncs incorrectly from the Health app.
Pour qui : Women with irregular cycles or PCOS, or anyone who wants a full-featured tracker without a mandatory subscription.
Note des avis : 78 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 11 605 notes
78sur 100
Pregmate solves a specific problem: it scans photos of ovulation test strips (and pregnancy tests) and outputs a numerical LH-to-control-line ratio. This removes the subjectivity from reading strips. Several users with PCOS and irregular cycles say this is the only way they can tell when ovulation happens without expensive clinic monitoring. The period and symptom tracker works as a companion feature. One clear downside: after a confirmed pregnancy, the app does not switch to a pregnancy tracking mode.
Points forts
Automatic scanning and digitizing of test strips into a numerical value removes guessing from line shading. Several users with PCOS say Pregmate was the first tool that helped them catch their unstable LH peak.
Reproches
After confirming pregnancy, the app does not offer pregnancy tracking, which users only find out after the fact. The period prediction algorithm sometimes keeps pushing the date forward instead of acknowledging a missed estimate.
Pour qui : A woman trying to conceive who uses ovulation test strips and wants to remove subjectivity from reading results while seeing LH dynamics across the cycle.
Rang 4. Note des avis : 78 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 7 312 notes
78sur 100
The most in-depth FAM tool in the set, with twenty years of history. Builds a real BBT chart, detects confirmed ovulation via a three-day temperature shift, and lets you compare your cycles against thousands of others. Indispensable for PCOS and atypical long cycles where other apps are just guessing.
Points forts : Real temperature analysis with confirmed ovulation detection, comparison against a database of real charts, thorough educational content, and support for cycles of 30 to 70-plus days.
Reproches : The interface looks visually dated. The forum can be toxic. TTA (avoiding pregnancy) features are weaker than the TTC ones.
Pour qui : Those who want to truly understand their cycle through the temperature method, especially with PCOS or long and irregular cycles.
Rang 5. Note des avis : 74 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 56 599 notes
74sur 100
The best tool in the set for active pregnancy planning: LH test strip recognition via photo and a resulting numerical graph turns ovulation prediction from a statistic into a biomarker. More accurate than competitors for PCOS with long cycles. The app's tone is sometimes perceived as insensitive around pregnancy loss or failed conception attempts.
Points forts : Photo recognition of LH strips turns a test strip into a numerical graph where you can see the peak and its dynamics. Works with PCOS involving long and irregular cycles. Several specific conception stories after years of unsuccessful attempts.
Reproches : Long cycles with PCOS (60-plus days) are sometimes interpreted incorrectly. Phrasing in the app around 'your fertility' and weight advice comes across as tone-deaf. Not suitable for IVF or IUI scenarios.
Pour qui : Women actively TTC, including those with PCOS, who are willing to use test strips and want to see biomarkers rather than just calendar predictions.
Rang 6. Note des avis : 74 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 26 082 notes
74sur 100
A mature, minimalist app with a decade of loyal users. Accurate predictions for irregular cycles, and the countdown widget is called a daily-life essential. The partner mode is unreliable.
Points forts : Accuracy for irregular cycles: users with ADHD and chronic conditions say Cycles was the first app to consistently predict their unstable rhythm. The countdown widget to the next cycle changes how they plan. Color-coded phases are clear without extra text.
Reproches : The partner mode syncs unreliably: data logged by one partner is not always visible to the other. The mood and symptom vocabulary is basic and does not always reflect real experience. You cannot select individual modules without getting access to the whole package.
Pour qui : Women of any age who want a reliable, unobtrusive tracker without extra noise: a long-term cycle journal without gamification or content feeds.
Rang 7. Note des avis : 73 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 507 notes
73sur 100
One of the few trackers that displays all symptoms directly on the calendar view without clicking into each date. Accurate predictions backed by a decade of history. The 2024 redesign made navigation harder without improving functionality.
Points forts : All symptoms are visible as icons directly on the monthly view: a unique feature among this type of tracker and essential for pattern analysis. History going back to 2012 is accessible and readable. Successfully used for avoiding and planning pregnancy based on reviews with specific results.
Reproches : The 2024 redesign made navigation harder with options placed less intuitively. Apple Health integration on iPhone is weaker than users expect from a mature app. Additional access tiers have been layered on top of previously purchased features, effectively trimming functions users already paid for.
Pour qui : Users willing to pay a one-time fee for a detailed journal without ads, who track data over years and do not rely on Apple Health ecosystem integration.
Rang 8. Note des avis : 72 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 88 763 notes
72sur 100
A straightforward tracker without an aggressive paywall, with high accuracy for regular and moderately irregular cycles. Data entry is fast. Accuracy drops during the postpartum period and with strong irregularity.
Points forts : Fast input: mark the start of a cycle and the forecast is ready, with no extra screens. Works with PCOS and irregular cycles, including after IUD placement. Customizable reminders and a countdown widget.
Reproches : With an irregular cycle, it sometimes shows a delay without explaining why or adapting the algorithm. Accuracy in the first months after giving birth is low. You cannot add a non-standard contraceptive type to track.
Pour qui : Women who want a fast, honest cycle tracker without a subscription, including those with PCOS.
Rang 9. Note des avis : 72 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 1 563 notes
72sur 100
A Korean-origin app with a warm tone and daily advice tied to cycle phases. Users note that the tone of the messages is what sets it apart from competitors. It has too many sections for simple period tracking.
Points forts : Daily cycle-phase advice is written in a supportive tone: users compare it to guidance from an older sister rather than medical instructions. Symptom and mood history shown as icons on the monthly view without clicking into each date.
Reproches : The interface is overloaded with sections, making it harder than it should be to get to simple period entry. The automatic end-of-cycle date entry is sometimes incorrect and needs manual correction. Medication reminders arrive in the morning even when the record was entered in the evening.
Pour qui : Those who want more than just a calendar and care about understanding their body through their cycle, with an emphasis on a caring tone rather than medical monitoring.
Rang 10. Note des avis : 72 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 1 136 notes
72sur 100
A tracker for teens with early cycles: educational content, accessible language, and a discreet app icon. Baseline accuracy improves over time. Older users may find it feels simplified.
Points forts : Content explains cycle physiology in language free of medical jargon and anxiety. Customizable symptom buttons expanded from a minimal set to a wider one over years of development. The discreet icon and name do not reveal the app's purpose to others.
Reproches : Prediction accuracy for irregular early cycles is low: the app warns about this but does not adapt the algorithm quickly. The vocabulary for describing flow intensity is limited. For users over 16, the interface can feel young.
Pour qui : Girls aged 10 to 16 with early or irregular cycles who need a gentle starting point without adult-oriented content.
Rang 11. Note des avis : 71 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 5 745 notes
71sur 100
Bearable tracks overall health and chronic symptoms, not just the menstrual cycle. Indispensable for those tracking multiple parallel patterns: menstrual cycle, mood, lupus, diet, medications. It can replace up to 12 separate apps.
Points forts : Enables parallel tracking of the menstrual cycle, chronic conditions, medications, and mood: the only tool that shows correlations across all patterns. A strong tool for preparing for doctor visits, since doctors receive concrete data rather than a recollection from memory.
Reproches : Adding a one-off symptom became more steps after a format update. Sleep tracking has been added but works less reliably than dedicated apps. The learning curve is steeper than a typical cycle tracker.
Pour qui : People with chronic conditions who want to see how their cycle interacts with pain, energy, mood, and other symptoms in one place.
Rang 12. Note des avis : 70 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 533 notes
70sur 100
A minimalist tracker with a neutral design, support for trans users, and Apple Health sync. Simple input without extra steps. Data from Apple Health pulls in automatically so no manual history entry is needed.
Points forts : Neutral design without mandatory pink tones: users choose the color themselves. Apple Health sync pulls in history automatically without manual entry. The discreet icon does not attract attention.
Reproches : Data from the Period app does not fully sync back into Apple Health. There is no way to exclude pregnancy or lactation periods from the average cycle calculation. The algorithm does not recalculate its model when predicting after a long gap.
Pour qui : Those who need a simple, ad-free tracker with no reproductive agenda for monthly monitoring. Works well for teens and those who value privacy.
Rang 13. Note des avis : 69 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 4 040 notes
69sur 100
A tracker built on cervical mucus and basal temperature methodology without an aggressive paywall. Good for intentional conception planning or pregnancy avoidance. The learning curve is steeper than standard cycle trackers.
Points forts : Full functionality in the base version: cycle tracking, cervical mucus, and basal temperature in one app. Accumulated history of 94 or more cycles stays intact and readable. Long-term users report accurate cycle predictions based on established patterns.
Reproches : The learning curve is steeper than a standard tracker: the mucus tracking methodology requires reading through instructions. Early predictions based on a single day of data give unreliable results. After a May 2024 update, some users experienced breakage of core functions.
Pour qui : Those practicing the sympto-thermal method who want free in-depth analytics and are aware of the app's ideological background.
Rang 14. Note des avis : 68 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 69 786 notes
68sur 100
The strongest conception tracker in the set: combining LH test strip integration with temperature monitoring produces concrete ovulation data. For PCOS and irregular cycles, that matters more than algorithmic predictions. The weakness is that health tips are sometimes inaccurate, and support for people with fertility challenges leaves complex scenarios like IVF and IUI behind.
Points forts : The only tracker in the set that reads test strip photos and converts them to numerical data. Ovulation prediction based on real biomarkers, not just dates. Helped users with PCOS conceive after many months of trying.
Reproches : Long PCOS cycles are not handled correctly. Some health tips come across as offensive (body shaming). The accessory ring does not always sync.
Pour qui : Women actively planning a pregnancy who are willing to use test strips or a temperature sensor.
Rang 15. Note des avis : 67 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 52 944 notes
67sur 100
High prediction accuracy even for irregular cycles with a spread of 27 to 48 days, confirmed by specific reviews. One user writes that the app predicted ovulation more accurately than Inito and LH strips. A documented case of data being shared with third-party trackers is a real product risk.
Points forts : Prediction accuracy for irregular cycles ranging from 27 to 48 days, with several specific confirmations. No push notifications and no unnecessary questions. Customizable themes and simple data entry.
Reproches : Documented data sharing with 59 third-party trackers, discovered via the iPhone Privacy Report. Some symptoms are hidden behind additional access and only return after a version update. No built-in symptom pattern analysis.
Pour qui : Those who want an accurate, quiet tracker for irregular cycles without aggressive notifications, but are willing to accept a privacy trade-off.
Rang 16. Note des avis : 67 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 10 656 notes
67sur 100
Period Tracking Calendar is a mature app with a long history and a broad user base. Customizable fields let you log unusual observations like clot count or specific symptoms. Accurate predictions for both regular and irregular cycles are confirmed by multi-year users. The downside: several redesigns disrupted the familiar interface and some updates have caused data loss. The current version is stable for most.
Points forts : Customizable symptom fields: you can track any parameter not covered by standard trackers. Daily motivational quotes get mentioned surprisingly often as a pleasant detail.
Reproches : Several past updates reset data without warning. The home screen in the new version shows a lot of clutter and some users cannot find the main cycle ring view. Pregnancy and postpartum tracking are not included.
Pour qui : Women aged 25 to 45 with unusual symptoms or conditions like PCOS, copper IUDs, or heavy flow who need a flexible journal without forced categories.
Rang 17. Note des avis : 66 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 4 167 notes
66sur 100
A unique product: a physical hormone monitor measuring E3G, LH, and PdG with a companion app. Genuinely helpful for PCOS and long irregular cycles where LH test strips are uninformative. The app falls significantly short of the hardware: no Apple Health integration, no educational materials about the chart, and incorrect logic around low fertility before ovulation.
Points forts : Real hormone numbers instead of guesswork. Especially valuable with PCOS. Visual graph of four hormones across the cycle.
Reproches : No Apple Health sync. The app does not explain hormone values. The peak is sometimes missed with first-morning urine samples. Testing takes 10 minutes with the phone in hand.
Pour qui : Those who have tried every tracker and every LH strip but still cannot understand what is happening with their cycle, especially with PCOS or after treatment.
Rang 18. Note des avis : 66 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 756 notes
66sur 100
A minimalist tracker with a numerical countdown to the next cycle, no pink tones, and no fertility focus. Especially valued by users who are uncomfortable with the typical visual language of women's health apps. The widget is discreet and does not draw attention.
Points forts : Visually neutral: a numerical countdown widget does not attract attention and does not reveal its purpose to someone looking at another person's screen. Accurate forecast for regular cycles. Simplest possible input: one tap to mark the start.
Reproches : No contraceptive tracking beyond the pill, so users on other methods cannot log them. The fertile window does not adapt to non-standard cycles. Very basic symptom set with no option to expand.
Pour qui : Those who only need a day counter with nothing extra: teens, non-binary users, people with regular cycles who do not want to share health data.
Rang 19. Note des avis : 65 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 18 462 notes
65sur 100
A tracker with a game mechanic: the llama reacts to the current cycle phase, creating a specific reason to return every day. The tone is shame-free and without medical anxiety. A countdown widget is included. Accuracy for irregular cycles takes a few months to calibrate.
Points forts : A llama that reacts to symptoms and mood: a concrete daily return mechanic without forcing anything. A countdown widget to the next period. A supportive tone, free of shame and excessive medical anxiety.
Reproches : Accuracy for irregular cycles takes several months of learning to develop, which is not always clear at first launch. Most symptom and journal features are behind a paywall, and the audience is predominantly minors without a payment card.
Pour qui : A teenage girl aged 12 to 17 just getting started with cycle tracking and needing a friendly, low-pressure entry point.
Rang 20. Note des avis : 65 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 1 195 notes
65sur 100
One of the oldest and most stable trackers in the set. Works without mandatory registration and without pushy purchases. Predictions are accurate for moderately irregular cycles. Several users with PCOS and atypical cycles note that the app adapts over time. The limitation: the ovulation date cannot be adjusted manually.
Points forts : No forced registration and data is stored locally. Accuracy for irregular cycles improves with length of use. Detailed journal with icons for symptoms, moods, and intimate days. Landscape mode.
Reproches : The ovulation date is calculated automatically and cannot be corrected manually. Reinstalling without a backup means losing all data. The interface has not been updated in years and looks dated.
Pour qui : Those who want a reliable local tracker with no account, are fine with a minimalist design, and value long-term prediction accuracy.
Rang 21. Note des avis : 63 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 73 347 notes
63sur 100
A reliable tracker with a rich customizable journal and accuracy that grows over time. However, ovulation date prediction draws consistent criticism, with documented unintended pregnancies due to incorrect fertile window data.
Points forts : Rich customizable journal: custom mood icons, detailed notes, and years of history. Cycle accuracy accumulates over time, with veteran users saying the app hits the day almost every time. Helps with PCOS diagnosis by revealing patterns over extended periods.
Reproches : Ovulation day and fertile window predictions are specifically criticized: several reviews mention unintended pregnancies due to incorrect dates. Loss of 10 years of data has been documented.
Pour qui : Those who want a detailed personal cycle and symptom journal without a strict focus on conception.
Rang 22. Note des avis : 63 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 1 285 notes
63sur 100
A straightforward tracker with a broad symptom list and accurate forecasting. Works during perimenopausal cycle disruptions. It does not support a menopause mode and continues to suggest a pregnancy mode during irregular menopausal cycles.
Points forts : Broad symptom list: vitals, medications, cycle, sexual activity, and work notes all in one place. Accurate cycle forecasting with reminders. Full functionality in the base version without restrictions.
Reproches : No menopause mode: during irregular perimenopausal cycles, the app suggests pregnancy mode, which is confusing. The interface has not been updated and some features feel outdated. The screen occasionally freezes and stops responding to taps.
Pour qui : Those who want a complete tracker without a mandatory subscription and are fine with a simple interface.
Rang 23. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 41 302 notes
62sur 100
Lively: an app for syncing lifestyle with cycle phases, with food, activity, energy, and mood mapped to specific days. This delivers real value for those who consciously observe their body. Predictions work, including for irregular cycles, with several users describing very unstable cycles and reporting high accuracy. Partner integration is noted as a pleasant touch. The core product is alive and functional.
Points forts : Daily food and activity recommendations tied to the current cycle phase: users say they understood for the first time why some days are low-energy and others feel effortless. Helps women with bipolar disorder distinguish hormonal states from symptoms.
Reproches : Data disappears when logging out, and signing back in is sometimes impossible. You cannot log a period longer than 10 days since the app simply does not allow it. For women in perimenopause or postpartum, the phase rhythm does not fit and predictions create anxiety instead of helping.
Pour qui : A woman aged 25 to 38 who wants to engage consciously with her cycle and is willing to pay for a detailed wellness journal.
Rang 24. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 10 162 notes
62sur 100
A deep tool for conscious cycle observation based on the FAM method: basal temperature, cervical mucus, and the Wink thermometer. Users from 2012 to 2015 document a decline: data disappears, support is silent, and there are rumors the company has shut down. Those whose app still works have an exceptionally precise tool.
Points forts : Complete FAM observation in one place, the Wink thermometer, the ability to see personal patterns spanning several years, and educational content based on Toni Weschler's book.
Reproches : The forecast does not recalibrate for short cycles even after ten years of data. Data disappears during updates. Support is unavailable or completely unresponsive.
Pour qui : Those practicing the fertility awareness method who have already read Taking Charge of Your Fertility and want a digital chart instead of a paper one.
Rang 25. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 3 008 notes
62sur 100
One of the most accurate trackers for long and irregular cycles: users with history going back to 2013 describe accumulated accuracy. The interface is mature and uncluttered. After a rebrand, the base version now limits history to six months.
Points forts : Accumulated accuracy for long and irregular cycles: the longer you track, the more precise the prediction. A mature interface without excess animation or pastel tones. Data going back to 2013 stays stable for long-term users.
Reproches : History in the base version is cut to the last six months, which breaks the main value proposition for those who have tracked for years. Cycles longer than 99 days during perimenopause are not supported. Shortened symptom labels after an update have become hard to read.
Pour qui : Those with irregular cycles who are willing to use the app for at least 3 to 4 months so the algorithm can build accuracy.
Rang 26. Note des avis : 61 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 15 944 notes
61sur 100
A veteran tracker with a 4-to-10-year audience. Accurate predictions for irregular cycles, and the neutral app icon does not look like a period tracker. After recent updates, full-screen ads appear after every action and have become the main reason long-term users are leaving.
Points forts : Accuracy for irregular cycles improves over years: users with long history say the app has become more accurate than any other tracker. The neutral icon and name do not stand out on the home screen.
Reproches : After recent updates, a full-screen banner appears after every action, and it is sometimes impossible to close before a timer runs out. No built-in symptom analysis or phase-based recommendations. Symptom logging features are minimal compared to competitors.
Pour qui : A woman with an irregular cycle who needs an accurate, simple tracker with no educational content: just a forecast and history.
Rang 27. Note des avis : 61 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 839 notes
61sur 100
The only app among the fourteen built specifically for perimenopause and menopause. Symptom tracker, information base, and trigger journal. Especially valuable during the irregular cycles of the late reproductive phase, when standard trackers predict the next period with coin-flip accuracy. A serious flaw: it does not support post-hysterectomy users before menopause and has bugs when saving period end dates.
Points forts : Women say they finally feel seen: symptoms their doctors dismissed have explanation and context here. Being able to show a symptom journal to a doctor is consistently named the top practical benefit.
Reproches : No option to add custom symptoms or triggers beyond the built-in list. The period end date often does not save. Women without a uterus cannot complete setup correctly. Date formats are not adapted to the American standard.
Pour qui : Women aged 40 to 60 in perimenopause or menopause who need a structured symptom journal for conversations with their doctor.
Rang 28. Note des avis : 60 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 10 413 notes
60sur 100
A tracker with a virtual dragon pet that grows through daily journaling and meditations. The only app that has built a self-care habit into cycle mechanics. The app sometimes crashes, and contraceptive cycle tracking is not supported.
Points forts : A dragon that grows from daily meditations and symptom logging: a concrete mechanic that prevents skipping. Personalized phase tips and mood explanations reduce anxiety. The dragon widget on the home screen becomes a reminder without pressure.
Reproches : The app sometimes freezes and fails to load, especially when opening the morning meditation. Contraceptive cycles are not supported: there is no way to account for the effect of hormonal methods on predictions. Past symptom history is not viewable.
Pour qui : A woman who wants to build a daily cycle awareness ritual through gentle gamification, with a focus on wellbeing rather than contraception and without medical anxiety.
Rang 29. Note des avis : 60 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 711 notes
60sur 100
A minimalist tracker with no fertility focus: just the next cycle date and simple notes. Good for teens and those who find conception-focused trackers uncomfortable. Notes disappear when editing.
Points forts : Clean interface without constant ovulation and conception reminders: rare in this category. Neutral visual style does not announce the app's purpose. Simple enough for a first-time user.
Reproches : Notes disappear when you try to edit them: typed text vanishes without saving. The notes feature has not been updated in a long time, suggesting no active development. Some content in the announcements section is occasionally inappropriate for a teen audience.
Pour qui : Those who need a clean countdown with no fertility agenda: people not planning pregnancy, those dealing with infertility, or anyone who prefers minimalism.
Rang 30. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 89 047 notes
58sur 100
The best choice for conception among those willing to keep a detailed journal: the fertile window prediction updates with each new data point, and gynecologists specifically recommend this tracker. Predictions break down for irregular cycles after giving birth.
Points forts : Fertile window prediction updates in real time as new data comes in: doctors recommend Ovia as the most accurate conception tool. Detailed logging across symptoms, mood, nutrition, and over 40 parameters. Ovulation tracking is available in the base feature set.
Reproches : With an irregular cycle, especially postpartum or after a miscarriage, predictions barely work and the app does not adapt to the changed rhythm. Pregnancy loss is not handled correctly. The merger with the pregnancy app caused data loss for some users.
Pour qui : Women planning pregnancy with a reasonably regular cycle who are willing to enter data daily.
Rang 31. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 22 076 notes
58sur 100
A simple tracker with a clean interface and Face ID authentication. Basic predictions work for regular cycles. The Stories section contains sexualized content that does not match the 12-plus age rating.
Points forts : Simple data entry and Face ID authentication mean no one else can see the data. Multi-year data stays stable for long-term users. A countdown widget to the next period start.
Reproches : The ovulatory phase cannot be edited as flexibly as the menstrual phase. The Stories section includes sexualized content despite a 12-plus age rating. Accuracy for irregular cycles is lower and the algorithm does not adapt to individual rhythms.
Pour qui : A teen or young woman with a reasonably regular cycle looking for a free, simple tracker without much data sharing.
Rang 32. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 108 544 notes
55sur 100
A strong bet on privacy and atmosphere: the data policy is explained in detail at registration and the tone is non-judgmental. The astrological narrative is not for everyone but creates its own niche. Prediction accuracy divides users: some say it got the day right, others report being off by up to two weeks. Irregular cycles are predicted unreliably.
Points forts : Transparent privacy policy explained during onboarding. Cycle phase notifications with concrete descriptions of the current state. The ability to share your cycle with a partner without a separate account.
Reproches : Irregular cycle prediction accuracy is criticized even by users who entered three years of history, with deviations of up to two weeks. The astrological wording of daily insights comes across as condescending to part of the audience. The app opens unreliably during phone calls.
Pour qui : Those who switched from Flo due to privacy concerns and want a tracker with a warm, non-judgmental atmosphere, with a regular cycle.
Rang 33. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 29 370 notes
55sur 100
Natural Cycles is built on basal temperature measurement: the method works for stable cycles with strict logging discipline. Oura Ring integration reduces the effort. Users with regular cycles achieve high accuracy and genuinely stop using hormonal contraception. The problem: at the slightest deviation (irregular cycle, stress, illness, postpartum) the algorithm produces false green days, and several users explicitly report unintended pregnancies. IVF clinic users note that ovulation predictions diverge from lab results by 7-plus days.
Points forts : With a stable cycle and consistent measurements, the accuracy is impressive: long-term users know the next cycle date in advance. The feeling of control without hormones is a powerful motivator for the audience that was sidelined by pill side effects.
Reproches : With an irregular cycle, ovulation is predicted with an error of up to a week, confirmed by users with clinical monitoring. The postpartum period makes the app completely useless. The algorithm does not explain why a day is red or green, which generates anxiety.
Pour qui : A woman with a regular cycle who is willing to measure basal temperature at the same time every day and treats the method as contraception requiring strict discipline.
Rang 34. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 14 931 notes
55sur 100
A tracker with an AI chat for cycle questions: teens say the chat is reassuring where Google is frightening. Accuracy is unstable with no adaptation to non-standard cycles after an implant or hormonal changes. No postpartum mode.
Points forts : An AI chat that answers cycle questions: teens say it explains unusual symptoms without panic, replacing anxious internet searches. A wellness journal with phase prompts helps connect cycle and mood.
Reproches : After hormonal changes or implant placement, the algorithm does not adapt and prediction accuracy drops without recovering. No postpartum tracking mode. Feed content sometimes does not match the audience's age.
Pour qui : A teenager who wants guidance alongside a tracker: for questions they would not feel comfortable asking a parent or doctor.
Rang 35. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 8 256 notes
55sur 100
A simple, no-fuss tracker without pushed pregnancy content. The main value is manual date control, customizable symptoms, and a long observation history. The interface has become less convenient over updates, and the forecast does not always recalibrate for irregular cycles.
Points forts : You can disable everything related to pregnancy and ovulation, enter any custom dates, and store years of history. Works well for teens.
Reproches : The forecast does not adapt to an irregular cycle. The interface has grown more complex with each update. Data sometimes disappears when switching phones.
Pour qui : Teens and adults with a reasonably regular cycle who want a simple journal without reproductive content.
Rang 36. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 2 701 notes
55sur 100
The only app in the set that explains the hormonal context of the cycle rather than just drawing a calendar. A daily phase notification and a hormonoscope help users understand why their mood is what it is today. The downside: some useful features are behind a paywall and the app occasionally freezes on the loading screen.
Points forts : A hormone chart on the main screen and morning notifications describing the current cycle phase. Contraceptive tracking without a forced selection from a list. The app's tone is neutral and free of anxious phrasing.
Reproches : No way to go back and mark the start of a cycle on a past date. The calendar screen is unintuitive, with not all period days visible. The app freezes on the loading screen after several months of use.
Pour qui : Those who want to understand the connection between the hormonal cycle and mood and wellbeing, not just know the next period date.
Rang 37. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 1 901 929 notes
52sur 100
Accurately predicts cycles for those with regular ones: veterans note it hits the day exactly. But irregular cycle logic and contraceptive changes are barely accounted for. Intrusive popups on every open cannot be closed without quitting the app: that is not a price point, it is a product bug.
Points forts : Forecast accuracy for regular cycles, with many writing it hits the exact day. Rich symptom and mood journal. Years of history help identify patterns.
Reproches : Does not adapt to irregular cycles or the first months after stopping contraception. No way to edit a specific past day without breaking the entire forecast. A documented data-sharing scandal with third parties is real and mentioned in reviews.
Pour qui : Women with a predictable cycle who want symptom history and advance notifications.
Rang 38. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 5 912 notes
52sur 100
A visually clear ovulation tracker for pregnancy planning. Predictions work for regular cycles. It cannot log two periods in one month, does not adapt to irregular cycles, and has no BBT chart. Most success stories align with regular cycles.
Points forts : A clear visual fertility window calendar, simple LH test and symptom entry, and educational materials.
Reproches : No way to retroactively log missed periods. Does not adapt to irregular cycles. Cannot add a second period within one month.
Pour qui : Those planning pregnancy with a regular cycle around 28 days who want a clear visual calendar.
Rang 39. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 397 841 notes
48sur 100
The only major tracker with European jurisdiction and a strict data policy: it physically cannot hand over data to US authorities. Deep symptom tracking including endometriosis. The weak spot: date prediction is less accurate than competitors and the app does not work offline.
Points forts : European jurisdiction and GDPR: data is physically unavailable to US authorities, and this is the only major tracker with that guarantee. Detailed symptom journal covering endometriosis and multiple cycle parameters simultaneously. Helped with three pregnancies even in the base version.
Reproches : Does not work without an internet connection, which is critical on planes or with poor signal. Period start date prediction accuracy is lower than competitors. Non-standard family configurations are not supported as a distinct tracking scenario.
Pour qui : Those for whom data privacy is the top priority and who are willing to pay for full functionality.
Rang 40. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 1 736 notes
48sur 100
A tracker built for teens with early cycles. Baseline accuracy works for regular cycles. The open-access chat room available to any registered user represents a real risk for a minor audience.
Points forts : Designed for teens: explains basic cycle concepts without medical anxiety. Tracks flow volume and symptoms in a simple format. Works as a first introduction to cycle tracking for those just starting out.
Reproches : The open chat room accessible to any app user is a risk for minors. Parental restrictions can be easily bypassed by the child through settings. Predictions for irregular early cycles are inaccurate without explanation.
Pour qui : Girls aged 10 to 15 with a recent first period, provided a parent has set up the app and explained to avoid the chat room.
Rang 41. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 647 notes
48sur 100
A tracker with a broad symptom set and long-term history for some users. It typically runs two to three days behind the actual period start. Good as a symptom journal for preparing for a doctor visit.
Points forts : Broad symptom list for logging patterns before a doctor visit: several users report identifying recurring patterns through the app. Ten years of history is stored and accessible by scrolling. Recommended by obstetricians as a documentation tool.
Reproches : The forecast typically arrives two to three days late relative to the actual start: some users have accepted this as a constant offset. Third-party trackers in the interface of some language versions have no close button. Privacy practices raise questions, with some indication that data is shared with third parties.
Pour qui : Experienced users with several years of data who are willing to pay for a subscription and value a rich symptom journal.
Rang 42. Note des avis : 47 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 7 436 notes
47sur 100
A minimalist tracker for those who only need a cycle date prediction. Simple input, clean interface. With an irregular cycle, the algorithm does not adapt: predictions break and do not recover. You cannot fix an incorrectly entered date without a full reset.
Points forts : Minimal data entry: just the start date and cycle length, and the forecast is ready. Clean interface without extra screens or sections. A good first tracker for teens.
Reproches : With an irregular cycle, predictions do not adapt: the algorithm keeps using the old average and does not update the model. A mistakenly entered day cannot be fixed without losing several adjacent entries. Lifestyle tips sometimes read as blaming the user when the cycle is unexpected.
Pour qui : Users with a predictable cycle who only need a calendar with no analytics or reproductive content.
Rang 43. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 74 160 notes
44sur 100
Historically helped users conceive with a you-will-never-get-pregnant diagnosis: ovulation prediction accuracy was high. But a redesign and community focus have made it awkward as a tracker: finding the calendar now takes effort. The community section is described as toxic. After the Eve merger, the interface is cluttered.
Points forts : With regular use, accurately predicts ovulation. Detailed logging of symptoms, mood, and libido. Historically helped users with infertility diagnoses.
Reproches : Irregular or postpartum cycles are barely supported and the app does not adapt to changes. The community section is emotionally unsafe. Pregnancy loss is handled offensively.
Pour qui : Women planning conception with a regular cycle for whom community matters.
Rang 44. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 5 627 notes
44sur 100
An app built around the concept of cycle-syncing food and workouts. The strong point is weekly phase-specific recipes and training plans. The weak points are that the forecast does not recalibrate for irregular cycles, the start date cannot be corrected, and some of the imagery comes across as sexualized.
Points forts : Phase-specific recipe and workout collections, clear phase navigation, and the sense that the body is behaving predictably.
Reproches : The period start date cannot be corrected manually. The forecast gets stuck with an irregular cycle. The imagery is perceived as inappropriately sexualized by part of the audience.
Pour qui : Women with a regular cycle interested in nutritional and physical synchronization with their phases, who are willing to accept a limited tracker.
Rang 45. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 880 notes
44sur 100
A hormonal wellness journal focused on understanding cycle phases rather than prediction. It teaches women to connect mood, energy, and symptoms to a specific phase. With a regular cycle, daily prompts land accurately. With an irregular cycle, the app loses its way: it fixes ovulation on day 14 and does not update the forecast when the period date changes. Several users reported losing a week of data after a restart.
Points forts : Women with PMDD and prolonged hormonal imbalance say the app was the first to help them see a pattern and feel understood. Daily phase descriptions give language to states that previously felt inexplicable.
Reproches : The forecast does not adapt to an irregular cycle and locks ovulation on day 14. Past dates cannot be corrected retroactively. The cycle terms (bleed, rise, shift, reflect) are unfamiliar and require relearning. Data has been lost after updates.
Pour qui : Women with a regular cycle who want to understand the connection between hormones and mood, and those who have just come off hormonal contraceptives and are learning their natural rhythm.
Rang 46. Note des avis : 43 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 432 notes
43sur 100
A veteran tracker with basic functionality: cycle prediction, symptom tracking, and color coding. Historical accuracy is adequate for regular cycles. The screen periodically goes white and support does not respond to reports.
Points forts : Color coding for period, ovulation, and fertility days is readable at a glance. Partner data access through a separate account is noted as a useful feature. Prediction accuracy for regular cycles is adequate based on long-term user reviews.
Reproches : The screen periodically goes completely white with no way to recover without reinstalling. Data sync with the online account breaks when the password is changed. Support does not respond to reports: several users could not recover lost data.
Pour qui : Users with a regular cycle who want a clear color-coded calendar and the ability to share data with a doctor or partner.
Rang 47. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 23 864 notes
42sur 100
A visually simple tracker without forced spending. Good for teens on early cycles. Individual days cannot be freely edited without resetting adjacent entries, and the forecast does not adapt to an irregular cycle.
Points forts : Works without a mandatory account and without aggressive upselling. The icon does not look like a period app, which matters to those who keep their phone private. Simple to set up in a few minutes.
Reproches : Individual days cannot be corrected retroactively: changing one day resets adjacent entries. Predictions do not adapt to irregular cycles and simply shift the date by the average. Past symptom history cannot be viewed retrospectively.
Pour qui : A girl aged 10 to 14 just starting to track her cycle and not ready to pay.
Rang 48. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 2 429 notes
42sur 100
A hardware hormone analyzer delivering real numerical LH and estrogen values, which is unique in the market. However, the device and consumables are expensive, the algorithm requires strict testing schedules, device sync regularly drops, and the app aggressively promotes more expensive wand types.
Points forts : Real hormone numbers instead of guessing from temperature or mucus. Months of data allow users to see patterns and understand a non-standard cycle. Support is described as responsive by some users.
Reproches : Wands expire by firmware even when physically still usable. The algorithm prompts testing too early for late ovulators, forcing extra wand use. The app itself is rough: charts are inconvenient for analysis and notifications are pushy and anxiety-inducing.
Pour qui : Those who have already gone through fertility workups and want precise hormonal data rather than a calendar prediction.
Rang 49. Note des avis : 41 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 67 917 notes
41sur 100
Up until the last major update: a simple and accurate tracker with a clean interface. After the update: weekday labels display incorrectly from February onward, history for irregular cycles is corrupted, and the manual ovulation day entry has been removed.
Points forts : Historically one of the cleanest interfaces: flowers on ovulation days, minimal input. Symptom and mood journal available in the base feature set. Cycle syncing shows how to eat and move for each phase.
Reproches : After the update, weekday labels are wrong throughout the entire history starting in February. With an irregular cycle, the history becomes an unreadable artifact, showing cycle lengths of 487 days.
Pour qui : Would suit those who want a minimalist tracker, but the update has made it unreliable.
Rang 50. Note des avis : 41 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 525 notes
41sur 100
A smart case with a companion app for daily pill reminders. It reduces anxiety about missed doses better than a regular alarm: you know not just that you were reminded, but that you physically took out the pill. Notifications are quiet and a missed tap on the sensor does not register as a taken pill.
Points forts : A physical sensor registers the moment a pill is removed: less anxiety about whether you took it. The intake history log makes missed days visible. Reduces cognitive load for those taking the pill as hormone therapy who need precision.
Reproches : The sensor sometimes fails to register pill removal. There is no option for a 3-month pack with a single placebo week at the end. Notification sound is quiet and gets missed without vibration. Buttons in the interface on iPhone Pro Max are awkwardly placed and require scrolling.
Pour qui : Those taking hormonal pills who are willing to pay $99 for the case plus a subscription, and who can accept occasional glitches in exchange for reliable reminders.
Rang 51. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 5 057 notes
38sur 100
A pregnancy tracking app with daily messages from the future baby. As a menstrual cycle tracker it has minimal features. Some messages from the baby are described as judgmental in tone, especially around weight and diet.
Points forts : Daily messages from the future baby build an emotional connection during the waiting period. Parallel tracking with a partner via HiDaddy syncs the couple's experience. Postpartum features for tracking the baby's growth after birth.
Reproches : Some messages from the baby are written in a judgmental tone: weight and diet advice reads like criticism. Some medical facts are outdated or inaccurate, with the onset of heartbeat stated incorrectly. Sync between the mom's and dad's accounts is unstable.
Pour qui : Expecting mothers with an uncomplicated pregnancy who want an emotional journal rather than a medical resource.
Rang 52. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 1 034 notes
38sur 100
A minimalist tracker designed to identify fertile windows from two inputs: last period date and cycle length. Works for strictly regular cycles. With an irregular cycle it loses orientation entirely: it does not allow manual date editing month by month and does not accept test strip data. Several reviews document losing all history when trying to correct an entry.
Points forts : Users with regular cycles praise ovulation window accuracy and simplicity: open it, check, close it. Several families report successful conception on the first or second try.
Reproches : No way to correct a past day or set a variable cycle length. Ovulation predictions diverge from test strips by 5 or more days at any deviation from the norm. No symptoms or notes fields. Interface has not been updated and deleting an entry deletes all history.
Pour qui : Only for those whose cycle is stable to the day and who have no need for fine-tuning. Not suitable for irregular cycle tracking or anyone who wants test strip data.
Rang 53. Note des avis : 35 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 62 722 notes
35sur 100
An app that went through a redesign that turned a simple tracker into an overloaded interface. Cycle history and forecasts are now buried behind several menu layers. For perimenopausal users who relied on years of accumulated data, this is critical. Data storage is unreliable.
Points forts : In earlier versions: exceptionally simple and fast cycle logging. Long-term users valued it for interface stability and predictability.
Reproches : The redesign buried core tracking features behind multiple navigation screens. Irregular cycle support is weak, with no adaptation. Data saves unreliably during updates.
Pour qui : Was well-suited for those wanting a minimalist tracker with no extra features, but the current product state does not match that.
Rang 54. Note des avis : 35 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 1 697 notes
35sur 100
A specialized conception tracker with color-coded days by probability. Historically accurate for conception based on reviews with concrete results. Users note a consistent one-day shift in the forecast versus reality.
Points forts : Color-coded days with green for neutral and red for fertile makes cycle navigation visual. Supports two ovulation calculation methods for gender selection, valued by users planning for a specific outcome. Helped couples conceive based on specific reviews.
Reproches : The forecast consistently runs one day late compared to actual results, confirmed independently by multiple users. The color logic for baby sex selection runs opposite to what academic sources describe, according to some users. Basic data entry requires an extra step across multiple screens.
Pour qui : Those who want a simple free tracker with a minimalist interface for a regular cycle and tracking intimate days.
Rang 55. Note des avis : 33 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 4 864 notes
33sur 100
One of the oldest trackers with users of up to 11 years. Rich symptom journal, color coding, and years of history. Irregular cycle prediction is weaker than competitors: users with endometriosis note deviations of several days.
Points forts : Extensive symptom list for logging: moods, physical sensations, and cycle parameters. Color-coded days make history readable at a glance without extra text. History transfers across devices for most users.
Reproches : Irregular cycle prediction is weaker than competitors, typically off by a day or two. Some users lose past cycle length data during updates. Two-factor authentication cannot be disabled without losing account access.
Pour qui : Paid version users without irregular cycles who are not bothered by an outdated UX.
Rang 56. Note des avis : 30 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 3 608 notes
30sur 100
A simple tracker for basic cycle monitoring with advance notifications. Works well for irregular cycles according to some users. After an update, the app fails to open for a significant portion of the audience and period history gets scrambled.
Points forts : Reminders several days before the cycle starts: specific reviews cite this as the main value. Simple symptom and note logging without account registration.
Reproches : After an update, the app fails to open for a significant portion of users. On update, period history shifts with past dates showing incorrect entries. The default date on opening is set incorrectly.
Pour qui : Those who want a free tracker without premium pressure and can accept instability after updates.
Rang 57. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 114 104 notes
28sur 100
The app was effectively destroyed by the Eve and Glow merger: key features disappeared (the cycloscope, daily overview, personal tone), and the interface became hard to navigate. Before the merger, predictions were accurate even for irregular cycles. This is now a different product from the one that earned its rating.
Points forts : In the old Eve: accurate predictions even for irregular cycles, a supportive tone without a pregnancy focus, and a convenient cycle phase overview.
Reproches : After the update, reaching the calendar requires dismissing five popups. The app has been reoriented toward pregnancy, while Eve was positioned for those not planning children. Test strip fertility sync is broken.
Pour qui : Historically, women who are not planning children and want to track their cycle without a pregnancy-centric interface. That audience has now effectively been pushed out.
Rang 58. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,3★ · 22 383 notes
28sur 100
Sleepzy tracks sleep phases, not menstrual cycles. It has nothing to do with period, fertility, or ovulation tracking. As a sleep tracker: the smart alarm and sound recording are unreliable and data is lost.
Points forts : A clear sleep debt and nightly pattern tracker against Apple Health data. The smart alarm wakes you during light sleep: some users feel a noticeable difference in how they wake up.
Reproches : The app regularly fails to open, fails to record sounds, and does not use the Apple Watch. It is not a menstrual cycle tracker and does not address period or ovulation tracking in any way.
Pour qui : A user who needs a sleep quality tracker, not a cycle or fertility tracker.
Rang 59. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 9 176 notes
28sur 100
The cycle-syncing concept is interesting: the app helps users understand the connection between phases and mood, energy, and nutrition. However, the interface is complex, selecting the cycle start date requires clicking one day before the actual date due to a UI bug, and support does not respond to reports.
Points forts : Explains the connection between cycle phase and mood, energy, and need for rest: some users say they understood for the first time why their state shifts on certain days. Journal entries and reminders help with scheduling workloads around the cycle.
Reproches : Selecting the cycle start date requires clicking one day before the actual date due to an interface bug. Support does not respond to reports. Recipes are limited to vegetarian options, which does not work for everyone.
Pour qui : Users with a regular cycle who want to sync workloads and diet with their phases, given patience with a rough product.
Rang 60. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 2 559 notes
28sur 100
A good-looking calendar with color coding, but functionally closer to a static schedule: cycle length does not adapt to the user's actual data, the ovulation day is fixed on day 14 and never changes. The feature for predicting a baby's gender by conception date has no scientific basis.
Points forts : Simple entry and color-coded cycle phases. Several users reported pregnancy on predicted ovulation days.
Reproches : Cycle length does not save when changed and reverts to 28 days each month. A fixed day-14 ovulation does not apply to irregular cycles. No symptom journal in the base version.
Pour qui : Those with a strictly regular 28-day cycle who only need a calendar with no symptom log.
Rang 61. Note des avis : 24 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 14 292 notes
24sur 100
MyFlo was built on Alisa Vitti's concept of syncing life to hormonal cycle phases: the idea resonates with a real audience. After a major redesign, the app lost years of user data, stopped predicting cycles accurately, and became a supplement sales platform. Several users who relied on it as a fertility-awareness contraceptive method lost their history at a critical moment. Support is silent.
Points forts : Before the redesign: detailed phase-specific recommendations on diet, activity, and schedule. The concept clearly explained why energy drops during the luteal phase or sugar cravings spike.
Reproches : Mass data loss on update, documented across many reviews. Cycle predictions have become inaccurate: the app regularly misses period start. Content has become a supplement sales funnel with no personalization.
Pour qui : Not recommended in its current state. Potentially for a woman with a regular cycle interested in hormonal phases, if the developer restores functionality.
Rang 62. Note des avis : 24 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 3 358 notes
24sur 100
A tracker with a basic feature set: reminders, symptom logging, and cycle prediction. Users with irregular cycles say the app does not adapt to changes. A review request button appears on every single data entry.
Points forts : Cycle start reminders and data change reminders work reliably. The phone camera pulse reader as an extra tool is noted as surprisingly accurate by several users.
Reproches : With an irregular cycle, entered data cannot be correctly edited: changing a date does not recalculate the ovulation forecast. The review request appears literally on every data entry, not just at launch. Mandatory registration before any use with no way to try first.
Pour qui : Those with a stable cycle who want a visually appealing interface with a detailed symptom journal.
Rang 63. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,3★ · 15 405 notes
22sur 100
Spot On was released by Planned Parenthood and was unique across several dimensions: no gendering, support for multiple contraceptive methods, and a privacy-first approach. After a major redesign, the app has nearly stopped working: users lose 5 to 8 years of data, cannot log in, cannot edit entries. Several people report that support does not respond. The product idea is valuable. The current version is a disaster.
Points forts : Before the redesign: the only tracker with support for the ring, implant, and other non-pill contraceptive methods. No gender labels and no forced pregnancy as a goal: a valuable position for this audience.
Reproches : Years of data lost after the update, documented across dozens of reviews. Predictions are broken: the algorithm averages incorrectly and does not learn from history. Missed pills or a new pack start date cannot be corrected.
Pour qui : Not recommended in its current state. Target audience: women with non-standard contraceptive methods and a privacy priority who now lack a working tool.
Rang 64. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 3 756 notes
22sur 100
The app is positioned for Persian-speaking users, but the interface appears in Arabic for part of the audience, notifications do not work for many, and SMS code login is unavailable without an Iranian phone number. Server outages periodically make the app completely non-functional for days.
Points forts : The ability to share a cycle with a partner has found devoted fans. Users for whom the app works note complete functionality and an attractive design.
Reproches : No email login: without an Iranian phone number, signing in is impossible. The interface language does not switch to English for some users. Cycle start notifications consistently fail to arrive. Server issues log users out.
Pour qui : Persian-speaking users with an Iranian phone number who need a Farsi-language tracker with partner sharing.
Rang 65. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 3,3★ · 745 notes
22sur 100
One of the oldest trackers with users of up to 16 years. Simple data entry, accurate predictions for regular cycles, and NuvaRing reminders. After recent updates, banners now appear after every action and have become the main reason long-term users leave.
Points forts : Simple data entry for those who just want to know the next cycle date without extra screens. NuvaRing reminders are noted as a rare useful feature. Data transfers when switching phones.
Reproches : A full-screen banner appears after every action in the app: a new content block after each tap. The interface has not been updated and looks like a pre-2015 app. The app periodically fails to open after updates.
Pour qui : No one using the free version. For those willing to pay for premium and who value prediction accuracy over interface convenience.
Rang 66. Note des avis : 20 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,1★ · 2 695 notes
20sur 100
The first period tracker in the App Store, which for decades delivered accurate predictions and a convenient symptom journal. Destroyed by a series of decisions: mandatory Apple ID login with two-factor authentication, an invasive 2026 privacy policy, and data loss during updates. Support does not respond or responds with templates.
Points forts : Historically accurate cycle predictions, a detailed symptom and mood journal, and cross-device sync when it worked.
Reproches : Mandatory Apple ID login with two-factor authentication has locked hundreds of users out. Ten to fifteen years of data were lost during updates with no recovery path. The new 2026 privacy policy requires accepting expanded data collection.
Pour qui : No one. The app is in active decay. Users with historical data should export immediately and switch to another tracker.
Rang 67. Note des avis : 18 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,0★ · 3 810 notes
18sur 100
An app with a decade of history that has lost years of user data multiple times after updates. Editing a cycle end date now requires navigating through several screens. The built-in recovery path through settings does not work, as users themselves have documented publicly. It has gone from a tracking product to a product people are afraid to use.
Points forts : When data is intact, predictions are accurate enough for regular cycles. Apple Health sync and the ability to add notes to cycle days were valued for years.
Reproches : The forecast breaks after every major update. The period start or end date cannot be easily corrected. Ten to thirteen years of data disappear without warning and cannot be recovered through the standard method.
Pour qui : Those willing to risk their history for a familiar interface who already have a data backup.
Rang 68. Note des avis : 14 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 5 716 notes
14sur 100
A fertility tracker with educational content about the hormonal cycle. It functions as a basic period and ovulation tracker. There are documented cases of unsolicited repeat charges after a one-time payment and no way to cancel from within the app.
Points forts : Educational content about hormones and cycle phases is structured more clearly than in most competitors. Shows the predicted ovulation date on the main screen without extra steps.
Reproches : The symptom logging list is limited with no option to add custom entries. Fertility improvement content is repetitive and does not get updated. AI chat responses are auto-generated and do not adapt to the user's specific situation.
Pour qui : Not recommended to anyone until the subscription and terms transparency issues are resolved.
Rang 69. Note des avis : 11 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 3,7★ · 5 360 notes
11sur 100
An IVF clinic patient portal, not a cycle tracker. The app is experienced as a necessary evil: buttons are unresponsive, messages cannot be replied to (only new ones can be started), notifications do not clear, and the interface looks like it is from the 1990s. For people undergoing IVF, using this app adds to the exhaustion.
Points forts : Access to test results and appointment records. Notifications about new messages from the clinic.
Reproches : Cannot reply to a doctor's message. Notifications do not clear. The interface is unreadable on modern screens. No sync with the main website.
Pour qui : Only patients of clinics that have mandated this platform with no alternative.
Rang 70. Note des avis : 4 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 3,7★ · 928 notes
4sur 100
A medical portal for patients at the Prelude Network fertility clinic. Not a consumer cycle tracker: it does not predict ovulation or keep a personal journal. Used for messaging with the care team and viewing test results. The app is systemically broken: login fails, urgent medical notifications do not arrive, data is lost, and sessions reset every 2 minutes. Users in the middle of an IVF protocol are calling the clinic directly because the portal is unavailable.
Points forts : The idea of a unified medical portal for communicating with the care team is good. Several users noted that when the app did work, it was convenient to see test results in one place.
Reproches : Login breaks on every open, there are no notifications at all, support response times are measured in weeks. The app delays urgent medical instructions for patients in critical treatment phases.
Pour qui : Prelude Network patients are required to use it by the clinic. As a voluntary choice, not recommended to anyone.
À propos des chiffres
Deux chiffres — deux sources
Elles aident à comparer les apps, mais ne remplacent pas la vérification de ta propre tâche.
Score des avis · jusqu’à 100
Le score conservé de l’étude inApp sur les textes des avis. Il évalue l’ensemble de l’app dans l’archive, pas la fiabilité d’une fonction précise.
Note de la boutique · jusqu’à 5
La note de la page de l’app au moment de la collecte. La note et la version actuelles peuvent différer.
Dans l’échantillon archivé de ce sujet : 70 apps et 25 969 avis lus. C’est le volume total de l’étude, pas le nombre d’avis par app.
Un écart entre les chiffres ne prouve pas de manipulation. La date de calcul et la méthode complète du score ne sont pas dans l’archive mobile. Compare les descriptions des tâches et les citations sources, et vérifie les conditions dans la version actuelle.
