Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 19.909 Bewertungen
72von 100
AlgoApp (formerly Flashcard Hero) is one of the best pure SRS tools on iOS. It supports FSRS one of the most accurate spaced-repetition algorithms available along with AI card generation and cross-platform sync. The technical issues are real, but longtime users give it high marks for good reason.
Gelobt
The FSRS algorithm adapts the review schedule to your actual responses more precisely than Anki's classic SM-2. An AI assistant generates cards right inside the app. There's a huge library of pre-made decks to download.
Kritik
Sync between devices is unreliable. CSV import doesn't auto-convert phonetic transcriptions. Cards inside downloaded community decks can't be edited.
Für wen: Serious language learners and exam preppers who want a top-tier repetition algorithm and the ability to build their own material.
Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,0★ · 2.293 Bewertungen
72von 100
AnkiMobile Flashcards is the mobile port of the legendary Anki SRS engine. The spaced-repetition algorithm is the best in the category: configurable retention, FSRS, proven over decades. It supports media cards, import/export via AnkiWeb, and thousands of community decks. The one significant weakness is the interface it feels archaic, doesn't follow iOS conventions, and has a steep learning curve. Complex card editing is desktop-only. One-time purchase of $25.
Gelobt
FSRS with configurable retention delivers a science-backed review schedule. Sync through AnkiWeb. Thousands of community decks for languages, medicine, law, and more.
Kritik
The interface doesn't follow iOS patterns and still feels like a web wrapper. Complex card editing is only available on desktop. There's no obvious button to study an entire deck.
Für wen: Med students, linguists, law students, and anyone serious about long-term retention who is willing to spend an hour on setup to get the best algorithm available.
Wert aus Rezensionen: 70 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 20.937 Bewertungen
70von 100
Brainscape is one of the few apps in this batch that genuinely implements spaced repetition with user-rated confidence. The method works, and the interface is cleaner than most competitors. The main limitations are around session control and text-to-speech.
Gelobt
A five-point confidence scale on every card directly drives review frequency this is honest SRS. Cross-platform: easy to create decks in the browser, easy to study on your phone.
Kritik
You can't set a fixed number of cards per session. No text-to-speech. The algorithm sometimes resurfaces cards you just reviewed while ignoring ones you haven't answered.
Für wen: Students and self-learners with ready-made card sets or who want to build their own. Especially good for people who study on both phone and computer.
Platz 4. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 21.102 Bewertungen
68von 100
Picmonic is a mnemonic learning tool for medical students short video stories with characters that encode medical facts. Not flashcards in the classic sense, but closer to them than a dictionary. The content for medicine (NCLEX, pharmacology, pathophysiology) is specialized and deep.
Gelobt: Narrative approach: each disease or drug is a short story with memorable characters. Users report the information sticks far better than reading from a textbook.
Kritik: Some practice questions contain factual errors (e.g., confusing 'associated with' and 'treated by'). Navigating the catalog for NP programs is confusing.
Für wen: Nursing and medical students preparing for NCLEX or Step exams. Not applicable to other disciplines.
Platz 5. Wert aus Rezensionen: 65 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 31.205 Bewertungen
65von 100
The Bible Memory App is a specialized tool for memorizing scripture through progressive revelation from seeing the full text to typing it from a blank field. Not classic flashcards, but spaced repetition is present. The audience is very loyal, and the product handles its narrow job well.
Gelobt: Three input modes full text, partial, and blank build real progress from guided recall to free reproduction. Verse organization by folders and lists is flexible.
Kritik: Voice recognition is unstable, especially with archaic KJV text. Apple Watch sync is broken. A number-entry bug prevents users from reaching 100%.
Für wen: Believers who want to memorize Bible verses by heart. Too narrow to work as a general-purpose flashcard app.
Platz 6. Wert aus Rezensionen: 65 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 11.384 Bewertungen
65von 100
A free GRE vocabulary deck from Magoosh with curated word lists. A review algorithm exists but has real flaws: it introduces new words before older ones are solidified, occasionally resets progress, and doesn't let you manually move a word from 'Mastered' back to 'Learning'. Content quality is solid good vocab coverage and mostly good example sentences, with some weak ones.
Gelobt: Completely free with no ads, solid GRE word selection, clean and simple interface, and useful for non-GRE learners wanting to expand their vocabulary.
Kritik: The algorithm adds new words before current ones are locked in, progress resets periodically, word statuses can't be edited, there's no full card list view, and Magoosh blog notifications are annoying.
Für wen: GRE preppers who need a free, ad-free academic vocabulary trainer. Good for passive review, weak for actively managing progress.
Platz 7. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.088.879 Bewertungen
62von 100
Quizlet is a solid flashcard tool with good study mechanics. Creating sets is fast, and the library of other users' content is enormous. But spaced repetition is heavily cut in the free tier, the test mode has a monthly attempt limit, and grading for open-ended answers sometimes marks wrong answers as correct.
Gelobt: A massive library of ready-made sets from other users. Multiple study formats match, test, learn switchable in one tap.
Kritik: The adaptive algorithm for weak cards only works in the paid version. Written answer grading is imprecise it accepts questionable answers and rejects correct ones.
Für wen: Students who need to quickly cram someone else's set before an exam. Long-term retention requires a paid subscription.
Platz 8. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 2.037 Bewertungen
62von 100
One of the more feature-rich tools in this batch: Apple Watch support, a drawing mode, games, and multiple study formats. The SRS algorithm is aggressive it piles up hundreds of due cards and stresses users. Development has stalled: voice control has been in beta for over a year, and iOS 26 broke the formatting editor. Most features require a subscription.
Gelobt: Apple Watch for quick pocket sessions, a drawing mode for handwritten input, multiple study formats beyond basic card flipping, and multi-language text-to-speech.
Kritik: The SRS algorithm stacks too many cards into the due queue with no way to reduce the load. Development is stagnating. iOS 26 broke rich text formatting in cards.
Für wen: Students and educators who need varied study formats and are willing to pay for a subscription.
Platz 9. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 4.131 Bewertungen
60von 100
A question bank for medical exam prep (USMLE, NCLEX, LPN). Explanation quality and question volume are high, with flashcards available as a supplement to the Q-bank. The mobile app is unreliable: systematic authentication problems (Face ID, session dropouts), crashes on iPad, and progress loss on connection drops. The web version is more stable.
Gelobt: Detailed explanations for every question that walk through clinical reasoning not just the right answer.
Kritik: The mobile app doesn't work offline, which is critical for clinicians studying between shifts.
Für wen: Medical and nursing students preparing for USMLE or NCLEX who study primarily on a computer.
Platz 10. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 12.399 Bewertungen
55von 100
A narrow-purpose app for learning the Japanese syllabaries (hiragana and katakana). Not a general-purpose flashcard engine. Spaced repetition is advertised in the 'smart quiz' mode, but it's critically broken: the quiz ignores katakana and only shows hiragana, even on high streaks, instead of surfacing weak characters. Handwriting recognition is unreliable for katakana.
Gelobt: Minimal and free, works well for hiragana, clean interface without clutter, per-character progress tracking.
Kritik: Smart quiz is broken for katakana the core feature doesn't work. Handwriting recognition is unreliable. No onboarding for new users. Saving custom character lists is buggy.
Für wen: Japanese beginners who only need to learn hiragana. For katakana, the app is effectively unusable based on current reviews.
Platz 11. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 12.266 Bewertungen
55von 100
An AI tutor that generates flashcards from uploaded material photos of notes, PDFs, links. The auto-generation mechanic works, but the AI often produces low-quality cards (inconsistent quantity, irrelevant questions). The 'hearts' system artificially caps study time. The app hangs after a completed quiz, wiping progress.
Gelobt: Upload a photo of your notes and get a ready deck. There's an explanation mode after wrong answers, support for learning materials via link, and integration with an AI tutor.
Kritik: The AI splits material into cards unevenly. The hearts system cuts off your session mid-study. Post-quiz hangs destroy progress. Onboarding asks for excessive personal data and contact access.
Für wen: Students who want to quickly turn lecture notes into cards for exam prep without building decks manually.
Platz 12. Wert aus Rezensionen: 54 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 3.909 Bewertungen
54von 100
Verses Bible Memory uses game mechanics (Type-Out, Speak Out, progress bars) to help memorize scripture. The repetition mechanics genuinely work multiple reviews describe going from 11 verses over a summer to 5 verses a day. But the product is clearly abandoned: last update was 5+ years ago, support takes months to respond, and purchase restoration after switching devices is broken. Speak Out glitches on long passages. Niche content (Bible, catechism) with no user-created material.
Gelobt: Step-by-step text revelation through games breaks memorization into manageable chunks. Progress bars give visible control over your material.
Kritik: Purchase restoration after a device change is broken. Speak Out glitches on reopening and fails on long passages. No user content only built-in Bible translations.
Für wen: Protestants and Catholics who regularly memorize scripture and can tolerate an outdated interface for a working algorithm.
Platz 13. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 13.695 Bewertungen
52von 100
A vocabulary trainer built around film and TV clips with contextual examples not a classic SRS flashcard editor. Content is fixed (the app's own word database), so you can't create your own cards. It took a serious hit from several updates that wiped user progress and broke audio. AI-generated illustrations are frequently criticized for poor quality.
Gelobt: Vocabulary cards tied to real clips from movies and TV shows words stick because you remember the context. Deep enough content for advanced learners.
Kritik: No way to add your own words or create custom cards. Multiple updates have wiped accumulated progress. AI images are off-topic. Audio breaks after updates. Development stagnating compared to competitors.
Für wen: English learners at B1-C1 who want to expand vocabulary through film context rather than building their own decks.
Platz 14. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 4.946 Bewertungen
52von 100
An adaptive vocabulary trainer with smart definitions and contextual examples from real texts. The concept is strong: the algorithm tracks which words are 'slippery' and brings them back. But the app is technically neglected constant sign-outs, progress loss, and no way to create a custom word list. The web version works better than mobile.
Gelobt: The algorithm delivers words through context and smart definitions, building understanding rather than just rote memorization.
Kritik: You can't build your own word list only pre-set collections are available.
Für wen: People who want to deepen their English vocabulary through context and can put up with an unstable mobile experience.
Platz 15. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 3.562 Bewertungen
52von 100
Japanese (the Kawa dictionary app) is a Japanese dictionary with built-in flashcards and a basic SRS system. The cards exist but are secondary the main use case is word and kanji lookup. Card settings are limited (you can't choose what to show). The pronunciation feature has been broken for many users for several years, which is critical for language learning. Handwriting kanji input underperforms competitors. No sync between devices.
Gelobt: Large database with example sentences, JLPT-level sorting, and SKIP-method kanji lookup. You can create your own lists and study them as cards.
Kritik: Pronunciation has been broken or unstable for years. No sync between iPhone and iPad. Card content isn't flexibly customizable.
Für wen: Intermediate to advanced Japanese learners who need word and kanji lookup more than systematic SRS study from scratch.
Platz 16. Wert aus Rezensionen: 46 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 12.178 Bewertungen
46von 100
A vocabulary trainer with fixed content (the app's own word sets). It doesn't let you skip words you already know and forces you through material in a strict order. No custom card creation. After the trial, most features are locked. An ad-watch unlock option deceives users it shows the ad but unlocks nothing.
Gelobt: Focused delivery of one word at a time with exercises and review. Clean, pleasant design. A free tier with ads exists.
Kritik: Can't skip known words or add your own. Rigid linear progression. Bait-and-switch with ad-based unlocks. Excessive repetition of familiar words frustrates experienced learners.
Für wen: English beginners who want a structured vocabulary course from the app and don't plan to go beyond the built-in word sets.
Platz 17. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 13.678 Bewertungen
44von 100
An Anki clone with spaced repetition and a decent interface that became highly unstable after a rename from 'Anki'. Widespread complaints about card loss on logout, unavailability without internet, and a long unskippable ad inserted after every deck added without warning. The SR mechanic works, but reliability and honesty of policy have degraded.
Gelobt: Spaced repetition is implemented. Offline mode exists (limited). AI deck generation from text. Simple card creation with image support.
Kritik: Data is lost on logout. Forced ads after every deck without notice. Support is unresponsive. Server dependency means the app is completely inaccessible when their server goes down.
Für wen: Students who need a free Anki clone for one-off exam prep and can tolerate ads and instability.
Platz 18. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 5.305 Bewertungen
44von 100
Flashcards with a fixed IELTS vocabulary set of roughly 600 words. Cards are organized by topic area with translations into other languages. The main limitation is that you can't add your own words or shuffle all categories at once. Useful as a supplement to IELTS prep but doesn't cover the full vocabulary range needed.
Gelobt: Cards are organized by IELTS topic blocks, allowing targeted work on weak areas.
Kritik: The word base is closed and small you can't add words from your own sources or from real IELTS passages.
Für wen: IELTS preppers who want a compact core vocabulary reference on their phone as part of a broader study plan.
Platz 19. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 2.885 Bewertungen
44von 100
MEDizzy Medical Exam Prep is a social platform with medical MCQ questions, flashcards, and clinical cases. Flashcards are included but there's no SRS. The main strength is a large bank of clinical questions with visual cases. The weakness is that typos and grammar errors in the questions undermine trust in medical content. No explanations are given for why the correct answer is correct. Restoring a lifetime subscription without the original Apple ID is impossible.
Gelobt: Clinical cases with visual aids. Broad specialty coverage. The feed-style format makes it easy to scroll through.
Kritik: No explanations for correct answers. Typos and errors in medical terminology. App crashes when switching to the background. No volume control during a session.
Für wen: Medical students and paramedics preparing for USMLE, NREMT, and similar exams through question practice.
Platz 20. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 10.097 Bewertungen
42von 100
An AI generator that creates study materials from user-uploaded sources (photos, PDFs, notes) with auto-generated flashcards, tests, and summaries. The AI cards are created, but quality is inconsistent. The app has quietly moved features behind a paywall that were previously free. Support is unreachable. Subscription terms are unclear with potentially hidden charges.
Gelobt: Scan handwritten notes and convert them to cards. Generate test questions from uploaded material. AI assistant explains topics.
Kritik: Paywall appears without warning mid-study on features that were previously free. Progress doesn't transfer on upgrade. AI chat answers cut off mid-response. Support doesn't respond. Test answer options are weak (other questions used as distractors).
Für wen: High school and college students who want to quickly turn notes into study materials before exams. Not suitable for long-term use due to unstable monetization policy.
Platz 21. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 4.098 Bewertungen
42von 100
TOEFL Flashcards from Magoosh. Cards are split by difficulty level with audio and example sentences. The product is functional but narrowly focused: vocabulary only, no practice for other TOEFL sections. Progress occasionally resets. Cards are fixed no way to add your own.
Gelobt: Difficulty-level splits let you start at the right level and move forward without wading through things you already know.
Kritik: The word set is fixed you can't add words from real TOEFL passages or create personal sets.
Für wen: TOEFL preppers who want a structured vocabulary trainer as part of their preparation, not a full course.
Platz 22. Wert aus Rezensionen: 41 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 5.545 Bewertungen
41von 100
A focus timer with gamification (a garden tile system) and a basic flashcard module. Cards are secondary, not core: there's no spaced repetition, and cards work alongside Pomodoro sessions. The app is genuinely useful as a study motivation tool, but it's not competitive as a dedicated flashcard app.
Gelobt: The garden tile gamification builds a study habit users come back for progress in the garden, not just for the studying itself.
Kritik: Flashcards are superficially integrated: no spaced-repetition algorithm, no analytics on which cards are weakest.
Für wen: School and college students who need a motivator for long study sessions, not a rigorous memory trainer.
Platz 23. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 206.138 Bewertungen
38von 100
Vocabulary is an app for passive word absorption through a scroll feed and notifications not real flashcards. Closer to a 'word of the day' app than SRS. Errors in pronunciations and definitions undermine trust in the content.
Gelobt: A TikTok-style word scroll lowers the barrier to engagement. A home screen widget acts as a constant reminder without opening the app.
Kritik: Content has factual errors in definitions and pronunciations. No user-created cards. No real repetition algorithm based on weak spots.
Für wen: Someone who wants to passively expand their vocabulary without much effort. Not suitable for deliberate memorization.
Platz 24. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 4.602 Bewertungen
38von 100
A mobile version of the '504 Essential Words' textbook in flashcard format. Cards include words, example sentences, and TTS pronunciation. The problem is that TTS is unreliable a critical flaw for a language learning app. An update also locked the second half of the book behind a subscription without notifying existing users.
Gelobt: Cards follow the structure of the well-known textbook exactly, which is convenient for anyone already working through the book.
Kritik: TTS pronunciation is unstable or plays too fast for beginners, undermining the card's core function.
Für wen: People working through the 504 Essential Words textbook who want the same material in a digital format.
Platz 25. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 2.292 Bewertungen
38von 100
The app has degraded significantly: it introduced a hard 15-card limit for free users, making it unworkable for any real study workflow. The repetition algorithm is weaker than Anki's, export is locked behind a proprietary format, and CSV import is broken. The only real advantages are Apple Watch support and a simple interface.
Gelobt: Apple Watch support for quick glanceable reviews without the phone. Simple deck creation for non-demanding use cases.
Kritik: A 15-card free limit kills the core value. The spaced-repetition algorithm is more primitive than competitors. CSV import is unreliable. Export is blocked your data is locked in.
Für wen: Casual users with a couple dozen cards who are willing to pay for a subscription.
Platz 26. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 2.068 Bewertungen
35von 100
AI card generation from uploaded material works, but the repetition algorithm is broken: the app shows the answer immediately alongside the question, destroying the active recall mechanic. Users directly compare it to Anki unfavorably. The server is unstable and file processing frequently hangs.
Gelobt: Auto-generating questions from PDFs and notes via AI speeds up deck creation. Quizzes are handy for a quick check before a test.
Kritik: Shows the answer right with the question active recall doesn't work. No difficulty customization. The server is frequently down when uploading files. AI misses key points from the source material.
Für wen: Students in Arabic-speaking countries who need a quick pre-exam review but not deep memorization.
Platz 27. Wert aus Rezensionen: 34 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 8.857 Bewertungen
34von 100
A passive English vocabulary trainer. Mini-games help with initial exposure, but the algorithm doesn't let you control the pace words get marked as 'learned' faster than they actually solidify. You can't add your own words, TTS mispronounces some words, and definitions are occasionally inaccurate. Real vocabulary-building benefit is limited.
Gelobt: Mini-games (crossword, matching) break up the monotony of repetition and keep short sessions engaging.
Kritik: The repetition algorithm doesn't adapt to the user: words move to 'learned' status without enough reinforcement, and there's no way to manually bring them back.
Für wen: People who want a quick introduction to new English words through a game format and aren't looking for deep retention.
Platz 28. Wert aus Rezensionen: 32 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 18.089 Bewertungen
32von 100
A bare-bones card maker with no spaced-repetition algorithm. Users note that deck shuffling is paywalled, flipping cards requires payment, and data gets lost. Ads include a scammy scare-screen ('your account has been hacked'). Basic card creation works, but everything else is cut behind a subscription.
Gelobt: Minimal editor create a deck, start studying, no ecosystem lock-in, suitable for users who want just flashcards and nothing else.
Kritik: No spaced-repetition algorithm. Shuffling and card reversal are paid features. Aggressive promotional interruptions. The ad network serves scammy content. Sync is unreliable.
Für wen: Users who want bare-bones digital flashcards without an SRS algorithm and can tolerate the free plan's restrictions.
Platz 29. Wert aus Rezensionen: 32 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 1.945 Bewertungen
32von 100
Not relevant to this niche: this is not SRS and not flashcards. It's a pre-built TOEIC vocabulary course for a Vietnamese-speaking audience with fixed content. No card creation, no user import, no real spaced repetition. Multiple content errors (incorrect word translations).
Gelobt: Structured vocabulary course with thematic sets for TOEIC prep. Low price for additional modules.
Kritik: Fixed content with no way to add your own words. Translation errors (shoe, football). No real SRS. Lifetime purchases don't survive reinstallation.
Für wen: Vietnamese students preparing for the TOEIC exam.
Platz 30. Wert aus Rezensionen: 31 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 3.066 Bewertungen
31von 100
Sharpen College Exam Prep is a companion to McGraw Hill textbooks with quizzes and study modules. Flashcards exist but aren't the main mode, and on iPhone they don't work at all for some users. The app is technically unstable: videos freeze, progress doesn't save, email login breaks, it crashes when switching tasks. AI features are locked for free users but sit prominently on the home screen.
Gelobt: Content is tied to specific textbook chapters questions match exactly what's on the exam. Material is broken into small blocks.
Kritik: Flashcards don't work on iPhone. Videos freeze mid-way. Progress is lost on logout. Constant sign-outs. Buggy UI hides some options behind clipped windows.
Für wen: College students whose course required buying McGraw Hill Connect, where the app comes bundled.
Platz 31. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 2.044 Bewertungen
28von 100
Not relevant to this niche: not a flashcard app and not SRS. It's a picture-based vocabulary trainer for learning themed word sets (fruits, animals, etc.). No custom card creation, no spaced repetition, no import. One review explicitly mentions broken audio.
Gelobt: Visual pictures help children memorize words. Simple multiple-choice format.
Kritik: No SRS and no custom card creation. Audio periodically stops working. With 4+ images shown, the top ones get cut off. Pronunciation sounds non-standard to native speakers.
Für wen: Children and absolute beginners learning basic vocabulary through pictures.
Platz 32. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 1.893 Bewertungen
22von 100
An app with critical reliability problems: data disappears when you create an account after working as a guest, cards vanish on crashes, and sync between devices doesn't work. The desktop version is stripped down (can't add cards). Multiple users have lost hours of work. Functionally weaker than competitors.
Gelobt: Folder support for organizing decks. Ability to add images to cards. Basic functionality works offline.
Kritik: Cards are lost when creating an account after starting without logging in. No reliable cross-device sync. Desktop doesn't allow card creation. No control over which side shows first when studying languages.
Für wen: Students who need a simple free tool and are okay with potentially losing their data.
Zu den Bewertungen
Zwei Bewertungen — zwei Quellen
Sie helfen beim Vergleich von Apps, ersetzen aber nicht die Prüfung der eigenen Aufgabe.
Rezensionsbewertung · bis 100
Die gespeicherte Bewertung aus der inApp-Recherche zu den Rezensionstexten. Sie beurteilt die App im Archiv insgesamt, nicht die Zuverlässigkeit einer einzelnen Funktion.
Store-Bewertung · bis 5
Die Bewertung von der App-Seite zum Zeitpunkt der Datenerhebung. Aktuelle Bewertung und Version können abweichen.
In der archivierten Stichprobe dieses Themas: 32 Apps und 10.776 gelesene Rezensionen. Das ist der Gesamtumfang der Recherche, nicht die Zahl der Rezensionen pro App.
Ein Abstand zwischen den Bewertungen beweist keine Manipulation. Das Datum der Berechnung und die vollständige Methodik der Bewertung sind nicht im mobilen Archiv. Vergleich die Aufgabenbeschreibungen und die Originalzitate und prüf die Bedingungen in der aktuellen Version.
