Where the car arrives on time and drivers get paid fairly, and where rides get canceled. Die besten Werte aus den Rezensionstexten: Zoox (82/100), Waymo (72) und Gridwise (68).
Wert aus Rezensionen: 82 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 5,0★ · 19.861 Bewertungen
82von 100
The robotaxi genuinely rides smoothly and safely. The driverless cabin with forward-facing seats impresses passengers, and emergency braking triggers reliably when obstacles appear. The limitation is a narrow coverage zone (Las Vegas and San Francisco) and waits of up to 45 minutes.
Gelobt
The cabin with no steering wheel and no driver feels like a real breakthrough, and the ride quality is noticeably smoother than a regular cab.
Kritik
Passengers are not always sure which vehicle to approach when several Zoox cars are waiting at the pickup spot.
Für wen: Tourists and tech enthusiasts in Las Vegas and San Francisco
Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 5,0★ · 222.933 Bewertungen
72von 100
Waymo delivers a fundamentally different ride: no human factor, quiet, and predictable in normal situations. The app's weakness is a narrow coverage zone and awkward pickup and dropoff points that a human driver would handle with common sense.
Gelobt
Complete absence of pressure, rushing, or rude behavior in the cabin.
Kritik
Pickup and dropoff points are fixed by the algorithm and often inconvenient, with no way to adjust them.
Für wen: City residents in San Francisco or Phoenix who value a predictable, calm trip.
Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 27.931 Bewertungen
68von 100
A useful tool for gig drivers: aggregates earnings from multiple platforms, simplifies tax tracking, and logs mileage. The automatic mileage tracker occasionally stops working without warning, and the hot-zone analytics cover only large cities.
Gelobt
A single earnings summary across all platforms saves hours during tax season.
Kritik
Automatic mileage tracking is unreliable: it sometimes fails to start or logs extra miles with no trip attached.
Für wen: Uber and Lyft gig drivers in major US cities
Platz 4. Wert aus Rezensionen: 65 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 246.244 Bewertungen
65von 100
Map My Ride is a cycling tracker with a long-standing base of loyal users that works reliably in most conditions, though GPS occasionally drifts by up to a mile and the auto-pause can trigger on slow climbs.
Gelobt: Stores years of ride history and cumulative stats, letting you go back to any past ride.
Kritik: GPS occasionally cuts corners or routes through backyards, and the app requires an internet connection to start even in areas with no signal.
Für wen: Cyclists who want to maintain long-term mileage and route records
Platz 5. Wert aus Rezensionen: 63 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,1★ · 2.016 Bewertungen
63von 100
A New York limousine service with fixed prices and generally punctual drivers, but with a critical vulnerability: rides are sometimes cancelled in the final minutes before a flight, leaving the passenger stranded. The app works but the UI is confusing when changing the departure point.
Gelobt: The price is known upfront and does not change during traffic or events, unlike the dynamic pricing of competitors.
Kritik: Last-minute cancellations due to driver shortages can happen with no real alternative offered.
Für wen: New York residents and visitors who need a reliable airport transfer
Platz 6. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 58.988 Bewertungen
62von 100
Lyft Direct works reliably as an instant payout tool for its core use case: earnings from rides are available immediately. Problems start with ATM withdrawals and disputed transactions, where support shifts the burden of resolution onto the driver.
Gelobt: Instant access to earnings after every ride with no wait for a bank transfer.
Kritik: When there is an ATM issue or an unauthorized charge, funds can be frozen for weeks with no real resolution.
Für wen: Lyft drivers for whom payout speed matters more than full banking functionality.
Platz 7. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 37.816 Bewertungen
62von 100
Drivers are professional, punctual, and know their routes, especially at airports. But an April app update broke ride tracking and degraded the interface, and support struggles with non-standard situations.
Gelobt: Pre-booking days in advance with a guaranteed slot and flight-number meetup works reliably for business travel.
Kritik: The app does not allow real-time location sharing with the driver, which causes confusion when exiting the airport.
Für wen: Executives and business travelers who need predictability
Platz 8. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 5.474 Bewertungen
62von 100
A premium service with well-maintained cars and polite drivers, but wait times of 10 to 25 minutes are long for everyday trips. Navigation errors by drivers and delayed trip completion after dropoff appear repeatedly in reviews.
Gelobt: Nine out of ten users mention clean cabins and professional drivers.
Kritik: Drivers regularly go the wrong way and keep the meter running after the passenger has been dropped off.
Für wen: Customers in Kuwait for whom comfort matters more than speed
Platz 9. Wert aus Rezensionen: 61 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 16.203 Bewertungen
61von 100
Licensed black cabs in Israel and the UK are reliable and professional when the car arrives, but coverage is uneven: at night and outside major cities there are no drivers, and the ETA jumps unpredictably.
Gelobt: Drivers are professional and know the city well, and rides are comfortable.
Kritik: ETA is unstable and can increase instead of decrease, forcing passengers to cancel and find other transport.
Für wen: Residents and tourists in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, and London
Platz 10. Wert aus Rezensionen: 61 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 4.689 Bewertungen
61von 100
A technically impressive experience when a car is available: smooth movement without harsh acceleration or braking, and a quiet cabin. The main problem is a chronic shortage of vehicles and navigation issues in dense urban grids where the car loops around the block.
Gelobt: Ride quality is noticeably smoother than with a human driver: no sudden maneuvers and no unnecessary conversation.
Kritik: Cars are unavailable most of the time, and in complex urban layouts the navigation freezes and cannot find the dropoff point.
Für wen: Early adopters in Austin and Dallas who are willing to wait for the experience
Platz 11. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 124.364 Bewertungen
60von 100
Yango has carved out a niche in Africa and the UAE, where drivers are generally polite and cars are clean. Maps are inaccurate in unfamiliar neighborhoods and some drivers ask for a surcharge or cancel an unprofitable order before the trip. As an alternative to local taxis it works.
Gelobt: Drivers consistently get high marks for politeness and clean cabins.
Kritik: Maps give incorrect routes in dense urban areas, and the driver is forced to improvise.
Für wen: Residents or tourists in Abidjan, Luanda, or Dubai who need a safe app-based taxi.
Platz 12. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 7.905 Bewertungen
60von 100
Gojek works fast in dense parts of Jakarta and Bali: GoRide or GoCar is often available within 5 minutes. The main issue for taxi rides is that the app shows a lower ETA than reality, and drivers selectively accept orders, preferring a cash top-up.
Gelobt: Extremely fast pickup in city centers: motorcycle drivers know every alley.
Kritik: Drivers often ask the passenger to cancel the order themselves and pay cash outside the app.
Für wen: Residents and tourists in major Indonesian cities, primarily Jakarta
Platz 13. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 16.246.858 Bewertungen
58von 100
Uber is a global leader with a wide driver network and smooth booking, but the stated wait time is systematically understated, and scheduled rides sometimes fail to produce a driver at all.
Gelobt: Booking takes seconds, the interface is intuitive, and most drivers are punctual and polite.
Kritik: The app shows 2 minutes but the actual wait stretches to 15 or more, and pre-scheduled rides sometimes do not materialize at all.
Für wen: Anyone who rides in the city and travels internationally
Platz 14. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 304.757 Bewertungen
58von 100
TripIt is a travel organizer with automatic itinerary import from email that worked flawlessly for years but now suffers from regressions: imports sometimes return errors and AI adds fictional flights to the schedule.
Gelobt: Automatically consolidates all bookings in one place and has saved users from arriving without a hotel or rental car reservation.
Kritik: Email import of booking confirmations occasionally fails without explanation, and calendar sync is unreliable.
Für wen: Frequent business travelers who need a single itinerary at hand
Platz 15. Wert aus Rezensionen: 56 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 61.870 Bewertungen
56von 100
Sixt offers a quality fleet and a functional booking system, but the pickup process is slow even for regular customers, and support is almost unreachable through the app when disputes arise. The offline experience diverges sharply from the quality of the app itself.
Gelobt: Wide selection of premium vehicles with transparent in-app booking.
Kritik: Picking up the car takes 30 to 45 minutes even with a fully completed profile and prepayment.
Für wen: Business travelers in Europe or the US who need a specific vehicle class without compromise.
Platz 16. Wert aus Rezensionen: 56 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 2.385 Bewertungen
56von 100
Motorcycle taxis and cars in the Philippines with polite and careful drivers. The real problem is a driver shortage during peak hours: waiting 40 to 60 minutes is normal, and some drivers refuse short routes.
Gelobt: Drivers call ahead, explain their path, and ride carefully even in heavy traffic.
Kritik: During peak hours waiting for a motorbike can take up to an hour, and some drivers turn down short trips.
Für wen: Manila and suburban residents who need a quick connection to the metro or office
Platz 17. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 17.325.455 Bewertungen
55von 100
Lyft is a mass-market ride service in the US with pleasant drivers, but with a systemic flaw: ETA after order confirmation regularly doubles, and the removed multi-stop feature has frustrated loyal users.
Gelobt: Drivers are mostly polite, help with luggage, and make even unusual situations feel safe.
Kritik: The stated pickup time after booking frequently doubles, and finding a driver during peak hours is sometimes impossible.
Für wen: Urban residents in the US who want an alternative to Uber
Platz 18. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 12.207 Bewertungen
55von 100
GO works well in dense urban areas of Japan, where a wait of 2 to 3 minutes is realistic. The main problem is that the algorithm picks distant drivers and ignores nearby ones, and the promised ETA should be at least doubled.
Gelobt: Drivers are polite, professional, and often help with navigation even without a shared language.
Kritik: Driver assignment logic is inconsistent: the app dispatches a car 10 or more minutes away when free vehicles are nearby.
Platz 19. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 4.424 Bewertungen
55von 100
A useful tool for independent drivers and chauffeur services with flexible rate structures and a convenient meter. The key problem is that rate data and settings reset with every major update, and background operation causes critical calculation errors.
Gelobt: Lets you precisely configure rates (base, per mile, per minute, minimum) and invoice clients directly from the app.
Kritik: When the app goes to the background the meter malfunctions and shows thousands of dollars, with no way to correct it after the fact.
Für wen: Private transfer drivers and small chauffeur services
Platz 20. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 3.070 Bewertungen
55von 100
For tourists in Italian cities a convenient way to hail a taxi without cash. Drivers are generally polite and show up. But a series of updates broke the address entry form, and some bookings are cancelled without an in-app notification.
Gelobt: Drivers call when they cannot find the passenger and see the trip through to the destination.
Kritik: Searching for and selecting a destination address intermittently stops working after updates.
Für wen: Tourists in Italy who need a licensed taxi with card payment
Platz 21. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 5,0★ · 21.141 Bewertungen
52von 100
The concept works: the tablet entertains passengers, the driver earns passive income. But after switching to an Uber-only partnership and changing the points system, payouts for many drivers dropped or stopped entirely.
Gelobt: Passengers readily interact with the tablet, especially children, and it genuinely improves the atmosphere of the ride.
Kritik: The tablet GPS tracker systematically fails to count trips, directly cutting into driver earnings.
Für wen: Uber drivers in the US who drive frequently
Platz 22. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 10.439 Bewertungen
52von 100
Ride Austin as an idea was strong: a nonprofit structure, driver background checks, and a gender filter for rider safety. Technical execution suffered from registration errors, spontaneous address changes, and mass driver cancellations in its later period.
Gelobt: The option to choose a female driver at night was a unique product feature for safety.
Kritik: The app spontaneously changed saved addresses, causing cancellations and confusion at pickup.
Für wen: Austin residents who supported a local nonprofit business
Platz 23. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 2.576 Bewertungen
52von 100
The flat subscription model instead of a commission attracts drivers, and in active markets they do earn more. The main weaknesses are no passenger rating for drivers (a safety risk), support that takes weeks to respond, and no multiple same-day payouts.
Gelobt: The driver keeps the full fare, paying only a fixed monthly fee.
Kritik: Drivers cannot rate passengers and cannot see their rating before accepting a ride.
Für wen: Experienced Uber and Lyft drivers who want to earn more from the same trips
Platz 24. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 2.038 Bewertungen
52von 100
A ride price aggregator that works when it works: the concept is sound, the savings are real, but Uber authorization breaks on every launch and prices sometimes do not match the actual booking price. Useful for occasional trips but unreliable for regular use.
Gelobt: One screen shows the best price across multiple services without switching between apps.
Kritik: The Uber account constantly drops authorization, which cancels out any time saved.
Für wen: Travelers and infrequent taxi users who want to quickly compare prices
Platz 25. Wert aus Rezensionen: 51 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 170.206 Bewertungen
51von 100
Grubhub Driver handles the basic order flow but the route distribution algorithm is illogical: it sends a courier to a distant restaurant when a nearby one is also a partner. Pay per order often does not cover real costs at low volume.
Gelobt: Blocks provide a predictable work schedule and a steady order flow during peak hours.
Kritik: The routing algorithm ignores restaurant proximity and sends couriers on detours without logic.
Für wen: Couriers in large cities with dense Grubhub coverage, working in scheduled blocks.
Platz 26. Wert aus Rezensionen: 50 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 730.223 Bewertungen
50von 100
Turo is a peer-to-peer car rental marketplace with convenient airport terminal delivery, but dispute resolution is nearly absent: the platform protects neither the renter in damage cases nor the host when guests violate terms.
Gelobt: Hosts in most reviews are described as friendly and flexible, and the idea of getting a car at the terminal without queuing works.
Kritik: The vehicle location in the app sometimes does not match reality, and support in disputes takes neither side.
Für wen: Travelers looking for an alternative to traditional car rental agencies in major US cities
Platz 27. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 372.926 Bewertungen
48von 100
InDrive is a negotiated-pricing ride service for markets where Uber does not operate or has weak presence, but the bargaining system is exploited by both drivers (agree then demand more) and passengers (lowball bids), and geolocation accuracy often fails at pickup.
Gelobt: The app genuinely helps where there are no alternatives: Tunisia, the Middle East, Latin America, drivers are found quickly.
Kritik: Drivers can change the route at will with no penalties, and adding a stop mid-ride is not possible.
Für wen: Users in developing markets where major aggregators are absent
Platz 28. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 8.298 Bewertungen
48von 100
SuperShuttle is convenient for pre-booking airport transfers, but operational reliability is weak: drivers arrive 30 to 45 minutes late or do not show up at all, and support is slow to respond when problems arise. The situation worsened after a change of ownership.
Gelobt: The in-app booking process is straightforward and clear even for first-time users.
Kritik: Driver tracking only shows the start and end points rather than the vehicle's actual real-time position.
Für wen: Travelers who need a prepaid airport transfer in both directions
Platz 29. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 4.648 Bewertungen
48von 100
Convenient pre-booking of airport transfers, but a mismatch between the promised vehicle class and the actual one is a recurring problem: instead of a Mercedes, a base taxi arrives. Driver tardiness by an hour and refusal to refund for a class mismatch appear regularly.
Gelobt: Pre-booking with a fixed price and flight tracking removes the anxiety of arriving in an unfamiliar city.
Kritik: The actual vehicle class frequently does not match what was specified at the time of booking.
Für wen: Travelers who need a guaranteed cashless airport transfer
Platz 30. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.471 Bewertungen
48von 100
TaxiMe solves a real problem in Bulgaria: it lets foreigners book a taxi without knowing Bulgarian and adds transparency to trips. Driver pickup speed in Sofia is usually fast. Key issues: registration for foreign phone numbers is broken, and the app periodically enters a crash loop.
Gelobt: Fast driver pickup in Sofia even in the early morning. Drivers do not see the trip distance before accepting.
Kritik: Registration for international numbers is unreliable, which blocks access for the primary audience of tourists.
Für wen: Foreigners in Bulgaria who need to book a taxi without speaking the local language
Platz 31. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.262 Bewertungen
48von 100
Bluebird maintains its quality standard for vehicles and drivers, but the app lets it down: the map sends drivers to the wrong location, the pre-booking feature sometimes dispatches a taxi three hours early, and cancelling that error costs money. SilverBird availability through the app is poor even with visible vehicles nearby.
Gelobt: Cars are clean and drivers are professional, noticeably better than street taxis.
Kritik: The vehicle assignment algorithm ignores the nearest available drivers and sends ones from farther away.
Für wen: Expats and tourists in Indonesia who need reliability and a clean cabin
Platz 32. Wert aus Rezensionen: 47 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 12.566 Bewertungen
47von 100
Uklon works in Ukraine and handles the basic task, but finding a car can take up to 15 minutes, and a navigation bug routes rides the long way when a direct road exists. Drivers sometimes cancel without warning and arrive at the wrong address.
Gelobt: Support actually resolves disputed situations, including refunds from a different driver.
Kritik: The routing algorithm maps detours instead of direct roads and does not respond to real traffic conditions.
Für wen: Passengers in Ukraine for whom Yandex is not available
Platz 33. Wert aus Rezensionen: 47 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.579 Bewertungen
47von 100
UZURV specializes in pre-scheduled trips, often for people with medical needs, and drivers are generally professional and attentive. But the system fails under load: drivers frequently do not show up at all, leaving passengers to find last-minute rides at surge prices.
Gelobt: The ability to book a specific time in advance and drivers with an attentive approach to passengers.
Kritik: Drivers regularly do not show up or arrive 30 or more minutes late, which is critical for medical appointments.
Für wen: People without personal transportation who need scheduled trips to medical appointments or organizations
Platz 34. Wert aus Rezensionen: 45 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 56.297 Bewertungen
45von 100
Drivers arrive earlier than on competing services, but the map tracker lags 8 to 10 minutes behind, turning the pickup into guesswork. Driver coverage at night and off-peak hours is very thin.
Gelobt: Drivers keep almost 100% of the fare, which is why many are friendlier and more motivated than at competing services.
Kritik: The driver GPS tracker updates with a long delay, so the passenger has no idea where the car is or when it will actually arrive.
Für wen: Passengers in New York looking for an alternative to Uber
Platz 35. Wert aus Rezensionen: 45 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 14.527 Bewertungen
45von 100
The long-distance carpooling concept works where the driver network is dense, but the messaging feature is broken for a significant portion of users in Russia and Spain, and the cancellation policy hurts both passengers and drivers.
Gelobt: In Spain and Latin America it lets you travel between cities more cheaply and quickly than a bus.
Kritik: Chat with the driver does not open for a large number of users, making it impossible to coordinate a meeting before the trip.
Für wen: Intercity travelers in Europe and Latin America
Platz 36. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 173.604 Bewertungen
44von 100
Bolt works reliably where the driver network is dense (Spain, Portugal), but in Paris and France in general a trip becomes a lottery: drivers in a chain accept and then cancel the order. Pre-booking for trains should not be trusted to the app.
Gelobt: In well-covered cities it is faster and cheaper than most competitors.
Kritik: Drivers can accept an order, drive almost to the passenger, and cancel without consequences. The system does not block this behavior.
Für wen: European travelers who are willing to have a backup plan for time-sensitive trips.
Platz 37. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 21.504 Bewertungen
44von 100
The platform works and provides orders, but in-app navigation maps lag behind Google Maps, the destination route is not shown before accepting, and support is limited to a bot with no real solutions.
Gelobt: Steady order flow and a simple onboarding process for new drivers.
Kritik: The app does not show the full route before accepting a request, which puts drivers on electric bikes or in unfamiliar areas in difficult situations.
Für wen: Drivers in Nigeria, Eastern Europe, and the Middle East
Platz 38. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 8.585 Bewertungen
44von 100
Kaiian works in Saudi Arabia and offers clean cars with polite drivers, but systemic issues undermine trust: license plates of arriving cars often do not match the registered vehicle, and drivers cancel trips without compensation.
Gelobt: Drivers are, by all accounts, courteous and keep the cabin clean.
Kritik: The arriving vehicle often differs from the one registered in the profile, which creates a real safety risk for passengers.
Für wen: Passengers in Saudi Arabia looking for an alternative to Uber
Platz 39. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 1.898 Bewertungen
44von 100
A mileage and expense tracker for taxi drivers that worked reliably for several years, but in 2024 lost customer data and stopped responding to support requests. The basic mileage-tracking mechanics function, but the reliability of the service as a business is in question.
Gelobt: Automatically logs mileage by trip and helps prepare tax reports in minutes rather than hours.
Kritik: Support is effectively unreachable and data for entire periods can disappear without warning.
Für wen: Taxi drivers and couriers who need automatic mileage tracking for taxes
Platz 40. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 2.259.174 Bewertungen
42von 100
Lime is an e-scooter and bike rental service with an appealing concept for urban micro-mobility, but it regularly falls short: equipment is often in disrepair, unlocking fails, and parking zones trap users.
Gelobt: When the equipment works, riding is enjoyable and lets you bypass city-center traffic jams.
Kritik: Scooters and bikes frequently arrive with a dead battery, a broken chain, or an unreadable QR code, so the ride never starts.
Für wen: Tourists and city residents in large US and European cities with a dense Lime network
Platz 41. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 225.611 Bewertungen
42von 100
Shipt is a shopper-delivery app with a clean basic interface for accepting orders, but the order distribution algorithm is opaque and feels unfair, support is inaccessible after deactivation, and the route bundling with navigation logic is illogical.
Gelobt: The order intake and processing interface is simple, and when order volume is good the earnings are noticeably higher than on other courier platforms.
Kritik: The algorithm force-bundles orders with incompatible geography, and after deactivation access to support and payouts disappears.
Für wen: Shoppers in cities with dense Target and Publix coverage
Platz 42. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 120.508 Bewertungen
42von 100
Roadie Driver works as a courier platform for large shipments (Home Depot, CVS), but gig rates have dropped so much that most routes barely cover fuel. The account activation queue can stretch to a year, making entry to the platform unpredictable.
Gelobt: Gigs for oversized cargo let drivers use a large vehicle as an advantage rather than a handicap.
Kritik: Pay per route does not scale with actual distance and time, making long gigs unprofitable.
Für wen: Drivers with a cargo vehicle in a city with active Lowe's or Home Depot warehouses.
Platz 43. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 6.217 Bewertungen
42von 100
Heetch operates in North Africa and Europe and undercuts competitors on price, but the driver GPS on the map often shows the wrong position, and drivers frequently cancel an accepted order or simply do not show up. On weekend evenings there are not enough cars.
Gelobt: Prices are noticeably lower than Uber and Yango in the cities where it operates.
Kritik: The driver's GPS position on the map regularly differs from reality: the driver is already at the door while the app shows a different neighborhood.
Für wen: Passengers in Algeria, Morocco, and Angola for whom price matters more than reliability
Platz 44. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 4.349 Bewertungen
42von 100
The core idea works: a large group sharing a van is genuinely convenient. But reliability let it down: drivers cancel at the last minute, one passenger was dropped in the desert at night, and pre-booking was removed from the app.
Gelobt: A group rides together and the shared-ride atmosphere is something Uber and Lyft cannot offer.
Kritik: Scheduled rides are cancelled minutes before pickup with no time to find an alternative.
Für wen: Groups of up to 15 students heading out for a bar night or concert
Platz 45. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.088 Bewertungen
42von 100
The idea of carpooling with coworkers along a shared route is sound, but execution is rough: the address input field crashes with an error, there is no tracking map, and the subscription is charged without confirmation. The passenger pool is small and depends on office or city size.
Gelobt: Female employees trust the service as a safe option for their daily commute to work.
Kritik: There is no real-time tracking map for a passenger waiting for their driver.
Für wen: Office workers in Indian cities with an active corporate carpool
Platz 46. Wert aus Rezensionen: 41 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 7.549 Bewertungen
41von 100
Klook is a tourist activity and ticket aggregator, not a ride-hailing service. The app is convenient for standard scenarios, but support is nearly unreachable when there is an order problem, and the refund policy is very strict even for system errors.
Gelobt: Wide selection of activities and tickets for Japan with a smooth purchasing interface.
Kritik: When a booking fails or a system error occurs, getting a refund or reaching a live agent is extremely difficult.
Für wen: Tourists planning activities in Japan and Southeast Asia
Platz 47. Wert aus Rezensionen: 40 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 297.551 Bewertungen
40von 100
Lyft Driver has unstable navigation that freezes, points to the wrong side of the street, and maps long routes. In some cities the order volume is so low that working the platform makes little financial sense.
Gelobt: The Upside partnership and small bonuses help drivers trim fuel costs a little.
Kritik: Navigation freezes during passenger handoff, shows the wrong side of the street, and does not play sound alerts for new orders.
Für wen: Drivers in large US cities with a dense Lyft order flow
Platz 48. Wert aus Rezensionen: 40 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 5.417 Bewertungen
40von 100
The best option for Addis Ababa according to locals, but driver performance is inconsistent: some cannot read the map, some accept an order and cancel. Support is weak and the meter sometimes runs without a passenger.
Gelobt: Among locals it is considered the safest way to avoid being overcharged on a taxi ride.
Kritik: Drivers accept orders and do not show up, or follow unfamiliar navigation without sticking to the route.
Für wen: Expats and travelers in Ethiopia and Djibouti
Platz 49. Wert aus Rezensionen: 39 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 137.759 Bewertungen
39von 100
Curb gives access to licensed taxis where they cannot otherwise be booked through an app, but driver match reliability is low: the search can fail after the countdown, and a cancellation fee hits immediately. ETA and address accuracy are consistently unreliable.
Gelobt: The only straightforward way to pay a regular yellow cab by card without cash.
Kritik: The app begins searching for a driver with a delay and does not notify the user that no cars are available until the wait limit expires.
Für wen: Passengers in New York or Chicago who specifically need a licensed cab rather than an aggregator driver.
Platz 50. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 198.330 Bewertungen
38von 100
Careem holds its position in the Middle East more by default than by quality: drivers systematically ignore unprofitable orders, routes are inaccurate, and adding an intermediate stop is still not possible. The service has declined compared to its early years.
Gelobt: A wide range of transport and delivery categories under one roof in the region.
Kritik: Drivers mass-cancel low-value trips and the app does not penalize them for it.
Für wen: Residents of the UAE or Saudi Arabia without a viable alternative.
Platz 51. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 37.183 Bewertungen
38von 100
Trip.com is convenient for planning routes across Asia, but support fails at critical moments: flight schedule changes are not tracked and resolving problems takes weeks. Dynamic pricing on airfare is opaque.
Gelobt: For trips across China it covers everything in one app: trains, hotels, attraction tickets, and transfers.
Kritik: Finding a confirmed booking in the app after purchase is difficult, and navigation through booking history is not intuitive.
Platz 52. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 22.084 Bewertungen
38von 100
Drivers accept requests and cancel, especially when a discount is applied, and the actual car often does not match the profile shown in the app. Navigation is inaccurate and support is nearly unreachable.
Gelobt: Good coverage at night in Saudi Arabia and Jordan.
Kritik: Drivers systematically cancel accepted requests and the app does not penalize them.
Für wen: Passengers in Saudi Arabia and Jordan without alternatives
Platz 53. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 3.975 Bewertungen
38von 100
A driver platform for paratransit: passenger screening reduces risks and routes are planned in advance. But the trip distribution algorithm is opaque, and many drivers sit without any orders for weeks as the registered driver count grows.
Gelobt: Passengers are verified and the route is known in advance, so the driver can plan the day.
Kritik: Trip distribution is opaque: new drivers go weeks without a single assignment.
Für wen: Paratransit drivers in the US for whom passenger safety is a priority
Platz 54. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.254 Bewertungen
38von 100
On Guam this is the only ride-hailing option, and when a driver does accept the order, ride quality is good. But in the evening and on weekends there are no drivers for long stretches, and the final amount on the receipt often exceeds the estimate shown at booking with no explanation.
Gelobt: Drivers who do show up are punctual and help with luggage. Pre-booking for early morning flights works.
Kritik: There is no mechanism to display the final price before the trip ends. Passengers learn the amount after the fact.
Für wen: Tourists on Guam without a car who need any form of transport
Platz 55. Wert aus Rezensionen: 36 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 31.607 Bewertungen
36von 100
The app shows a driver 4 minutes away, but the actual wait is 15 to 22 minutes. Drivers regularly do not drive to the pickup point due to licensing restrictions and ask for a cash top-up during the trip.
Gelobt: When the driver does arrive, they are generally polite and the cars are in good condition.
Kritik: The pickup point on the map often differs from where the driver actually stops, and there is no way to resolve this during the trip.
Für wen: Residents of Spain and Latin America who are familiar with VTC licensing restrictions
Platz 56. Wert aus Rezensionen: 36 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 4.367 Bewertungen
36von 100
The fixed pickup point concept reduces costs for passengers, but the driver side suffers: navigation is unreliable and slow, the app requires reinstalling to function properly, and support responds more slowly than a shift demands. Driver satisfaction is low.
Gelobt: Fixed shift schedules and predictable earnings appeal to drivers who want a stable timetable.
Kritik: Built-in navigation is incorrect and slow, forcing drivers to stop mid-route.
Für wen: Drivers in Via's service cities who value a stable schedule
Platz 57. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 32.137 Bewertungen
35von 100
A car rental aggregator with decent search but unreliable handoff of conditions to partners: insurance paid through the app is rejected at the counter, and the reserved vehicle class is not guaranteed. Support cannot help.
Gelobt: Search covers hundreds of suppliers at once, making it easy to find a good deal at non-standard airports.
Kritik: After booking, changing pickup time or location requires a phone call. The app does not support self-service edits to existing orders.
Platz 58. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 3.440 Bewertungen
35von 100
A premium service in Kuwait with clean cars and polite drivers, but the in-app price and the final amount frequently do not match, GPS tracking lags, and the app crashes when topping up the wallet.
Gelobt: Drivers are punctual and cars come equipped with chargers and a screen.
Kritik: The final trip price differs from the one shown at the time of booking.
Für wen: Kuwait residents who need a predictable business transfer
Platz 59. Wert aus Rezensionen: 34 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 9.546 Bewertungen
34von 100
My Ride K-12 tracks school buses, it is not a ride-hailing service. Tracking is unreliable: buses disappear from the map, coordinates freeze at one point for hours, and arrival notifications are delayed or never arrive.
Gelobt: When GPS works correctly, parents can time their child's departure from home precisely.
Kritik: The bus GPS position freezes or disappears entirely in roughly half of cases, making the app unreliable.
Für wen: Parents of schoolchildren in US districts connected to the Tyler Technologies platform
Platz 60. Wert aus Rezensionen: 34 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 4.994 Bewertungen
34von 100
The only taxi aggregator in the Maldives, but driver availability is critically low: in Male during off-peak hours there are no cars, and drivers mass-cancel pre-bookings without explanation. The final amount often differs from the in-app estimate.
Gelobt: When a driver does show up, the service is fast and drivers are generally friendly.
Kritik: Drivers mass-cancel pre-bookings and do not get in touch before the trip.
Für wen: Residents and tourists in Male without alternative options
Platz 61. Wert aus Rezensionen: 33 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 22.656 Bewertungen
33von 100
Drivers enter the final amount manually and almost always charge more than the app shows. Support ignores overcharge complaints. For tourists without a local SIM, registration does not work at all.
Gelobt: In Istanbul it finds taxis quickly, which is valuable in a city where hailing a cab on the street at peak hours is difficult.
Kritik: The app shows an estimated price, but drivers run the meter and can charge twice as much without breaking any rules.
Für wen: Local Turkish residents with a linked card who know the real fare structure
Platz 62. Wert aus Rezensionen: 33 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 14.396 Bewertungen
33von 100
The app works in Jordan and Lebanon, but the key problem is that the on-screen price and the final meter total do not match. Drivers often arrive late or refuse short distances, and support responds rudely at night.
Gelobt: Fast pickup during peak hours in central Amman.
Kritik: The final trip amount is regularly higher than what was shown at booking, and disputing it through support is extremely difficult.
Platz 63. Wert aus Rezensionen: 33 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 4.843 Bewertungen
33von 100
A Bangladeshi aggregator with a good idea around cashless payment, but systemic failures turn the payment flow into a lottery: auto-charges without confirmation, freezing when selecting a route, and drivers still demanding cash. Car availability is low.
Gelobt: Online payment without haggling with the driver is what users appreciate when it works.
Kritik: The app freezes when selecting a destination and incorrectly handles payment confirmations.
Für wen: Urban users in Dhaka who are willing to put up with instability for cashless payment
Platz 64. Wert aus Rezensionen: 32 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 38.618 Bewertungen
32von 100
Drivers accept orders while already en route with another passenger, intentionally dragging out the wait to push up the fare. Cars arrive with different plates than shown in the app, and money can be charged with no trip taken.
Gelobt: The app works in smaller cities and countries that major platforms have not reached.
Kritik: The map frequently routes drivers to the wrong address, especially in high-rise residential complexes and non-standard locations.
Für wen: Travelers in regions of Asia and Latin America where Uber is not available
Platz 65. Wert aus Rezensionen: 32 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.451 Bewertungen
32von 100
Drivers regularly fail to show up or cancel at the last minute, and some charge more than the app shows. Routing and positioning work poorly, and drivers get confused about the address even at obvious locations.
Gelobt: For the local area it is sometimes cheaper than Uber and Lyft, and repeat users appreciate familiar drivers.
Kritik: There is no reliable way to contact the driver before the trip and no effective way to file a complaint with dispatch.
Für wen: Neighborhood residents willing to accept unpredictability in exchange for a lower price
Platz 66. Wert aus Rezensionen: 31 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 16.624 Bewertungen
31von 100
Drivers mass-refuse short-distance orders or orders at a low base fare, leaving passengers waiting 30 or more minutes for a match. Intrusive 99Pay pop-ups clutter the ride-booking interface.
Gelobt: Good coverage in mid-sized Brazilian cities where Uber performs worse.
Kritik: Drivers accept a request while still carrying another passenger from a different app, then cancel without penalty.
Für wen: Passengers in Brazilian cities outside of São Paulo
Platz 67. Wert aus Rezensionen: 31 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 2.020 Bewertungen
31von 100
Taiwan's 55688 taxi app is convenient in theory: quick search, live vehicle tracking, a basic English version. In practice the app crashes on launch, registration for foreign numbers does not work, and after updates the location stops refreshing.
Gelobt: Taxis arrive genuinely fast, and 55688 network drivers have a reputation for being honest.
Kritik: Registration for foreign phone numbers is broken, and the app frequently crashes on open.
Für wen: Local Taiwan residents with a stable Taiwanese phone number
Platz 68. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 4.711 Bewertungen
30von 100
A scooter service with attractive vehicle design, but a high rate of defective units and unstable coverage: scooters stop mid-ride, geofences trigger incorrectly, and support is unreachable. Leaving Portland without notice or refunds is a red flag.
Gelobt: Scooter design is more comfortable than competitors. Mounting and handling feel better than Lime.
Kritik: A significant portion of vehicles are broken or speed-limited so severely they cannot keep up with a group ride.
Für wen: Tourists in cities where Bolt has an active presence, ready for surprises
Platz 69. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.709 Bewertungen
30von 100
TADA operates in Singapore and Vietnam and positions itself as a cheaper alternative to Grab, but driver scarcity makes booking a lottery: more than half of attempts end with no match. The app completely freezes the phone while searching for a driver.
Gelobt: Drivers who do show up are often rated as polite and talkative.
Kritik: The app freezes the entire phone during driver search and cannot be exited without a forced restart.
Für wen: Users in Singapore and Vietnam who are willing to wait and have a backup plan
Platz 70. Wert aus Rezensionen: 29 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 19.728 Bewertungen
29von 100
The corporate carpooling concept is sound, but the app has left basic interface bugs unfixed for years: buttons do not respond to taps, routes do not open, and the matching algorithm finds a carpool partner only in rare cases.
Gelobt: When a match happens, the ride is cheaper than Uber and Lyft and the passenger shares the car with a company colleague.
Kritik: The matching algorithm fails: most requests go unmatched even on typical commute routes.
Für wen: Employees of companies with a corporate Scoop contract
Platz 71. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 652.864 Bewertungen
28von 100
Uber Driver is a tool for drivers with critical failures in core functions: navigation stops working for weeks with no support response, the request queue freezes for days at a time, and a mandatory minimum acceptance rate pushes experienced drivers off the platform.
Gelobt: The onboarding interface is relatively transparent, and basic operations for accepting and completing trips are clear to new drivers.
Kritik: Navigation regularly stops working after updates, support does not resolve problems and ends conversations, and order distribution is unfair and opaque.
Für wen: Drivers in high-demand cities who are willing to endure platform instability for the order volume
Platz 72. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 68.508 Bewertungen
28von 100
Ola on iOS is effectively non-functional for users outside India: the app freezes on the map after login, OTP does not arrive, and support is only reachable through template forms. Even in India, drivers regularly cancel unprofitable trips or agree a cash price outside the meter.
Gelobt: In major Indian cities there is a wide fleet of cars and auto-rickshaws for short trips.
Kritik: Driver search frequently shows 2 minutes while actual wait is 17 or more, and the platform does not penalize this discrepancy.
Für wen: Residents of Bangalore or Mumbai with a local phone number and familiarity with cash payments.
Platz 73. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 56.982 Bewertungen
28von 100
A courier app with unstable operation: it freezes during parcel scanning, loses GPS between stops, and ignores driver requests for days. The core product is unpolished.
Gelobt: Flexible scheduling and the ability to self-select shifts attract students and part-time workers.
Kritik: Navigation is not integrated into the app, requiring constant switching between maps at every stop.
Platz 74. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 8.099 Bewertungen
28von 100
Fasten Russia is a rebrand of Uber in Russia, and service quality noticeably declined after the transition: drivers mark arrival before reaching the pickup point, support is unreachable or redirects to email, and the app charges tips without user knowledge.
Gelobt: In some regions like Bashkortostan the app remains a working alternative when competition is unstable.
Kritik: Drivers en masse fail to reach the pickup point, mark themselves as arrived, and force the passenger to locate the car independently.
Für wen: Passengers in Russian cities where no other options exist
Platz 75. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 5.928 Bewertungen
28von 100
A scooter service with chaotic geolocation: in slow zones speed drops to 3 km/h in the middle of the road, and parking within the rules turns into a quest through dark streets. Vehicle fleet condition is inconsistent.
Gelobt: In tourist spots like central Washington it is a convenient way to reach several points without hunting for parking.
Kritik: Geofences work incorrectly and reduce speed at arbitrary locations, including on the roadway itself.
Für wen: Tourists in downtown DC without alternatives
Platz 76. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 4.199 Bewertungen
28von 100
Half the drivers do not show up at all, and those who do arrive late. The mismatch between the driver's photo and vehicle plate in the app and the real car is a serious safety concern.
Gelobt: When the ride works out, drivers are polite and the vehicles are comfortable.
Kritik: The driver inside the car does not match the profile in the app and there is no verification mechanism.
Für wen: Passengers in Cairo and Lahore with a backup plan in case of cancellation
Platz 77. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 2.296 Bewertungen
28von 100
A transit service for Arlington based on Via with chronic driver availability problems and wait times up to an hour and a half. Shared rides with frequent passenger pickups make trip time unpredictable.
Gelobt: Cheaper than Uber and Lyft and covers areas without public transportation.
Kritik: No advance trip planning. Drivers change the route at their discretion to pick up other passengers without accounting for delays.
Für wen: Arlington residents without a car who can tolerate an unpredictable schedule
Platz 78. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 1.284 Bewertungen
28von 100
Catching a taxi through the app is increasingly difficult even with a higher bid. Map tracking lags or does not work at all, and the app often freezes immediately after booking, leaving the user unable to tell whether the order was confirmed. Support does not respond.
Gelobt: When everything works, the interface is simple and clear, and the ability to pre-book is useful for the airport.
Kritik: Driver tracking on the map systematically does not work on iOS, and the order status after booking is unclear.
Für wen: Passengers in Singapore who need a CDG taxi and have no alternative to Grab
Platz 79. Wert aus Rezensionen: 27 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 13.567 Bewertungen
27von 100
The app is technically unstable: it freezes on launch, navigation gives the wrong route, drivers see a higher final price than the passenger, and withdrawing wallet funds to a bank account is nearly impossible.
Gelobt: Fast vehicle arrival and rare driver-side cancellations when the system works.
Kritik: The app regularly freezes on load, leaving the user unable to track whether the driver has arrived.
Für wen: Passengers in Saudi Arabia when no other option is available
Platz 80. Wert aus Rezensionen: 24 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 4.099 Bewertungen
24von 100
Drivers regularly quote a price higher than what the app shows, refuse card payment, and sometimes drop the passenger a block short of the address. The product does not deliver on its promises.
Gelobt: When the car does arrive with an honest driver, pickup speed is better than a regular taxi.
Kritik: The price shown in the app and the actual trip price regularly differ with no explanation.
Für wen: New York users who are willing to confirm the price verbally before getting in
Platz 81. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 29.493 Bewertungen
22von 100
Drivers accept orders and do not show up, yet the money is still charged. Vehicles are dirty and frequently do not match the stated category. Network coverage is unreliable: during quiet hours finding a car without a surge is nearly impossible.
Gelobt: During peak hours in major cities in Mexico and Latin America cars are found quickly.
Kritik: There is no reliable vehicle quality control: the economy category can deliver anything.
Für wen: Passengers in Mexico and Colombia with a backup option ready
Platz 82. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 2.845 Bewertungen
22von 100
A dispatch platform for paratransit drivers in New York with very low rates, payment delays of up to three weeks, and an iOS app with no real navigation. Drivers use it out of necessity, not by choice.
Gelobt: Support occasionally resolves issues quickly if you reach the right person.
Kritik: Payments are delayed up to three weeks and the app has no built-in navigation.
Für wen: NYC TLC drivers with an MTA Access-A-Ride contract who have no other choice
Platz 83. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,2★ · 1.022 Bewertungen
22von 100
For drivers, fares are calculated incorrectly: the passenger sees one amount and the driver sees another, and the platform takes the difference as commission. GPS is slow and outdated, the app does not support English, and several users reported suspicious login attempts after registration.
Gelobt: In markets where DiDi runs stably, drivers appreciate the relatively fast order turnover.
Kritik: Driver payout calculation is opaque and does not match what the passenger sees in the app.
Für wen: Drivers in Latin America and the Middle East where no better platform exists
Platz 84. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 1.464 Bewertungen
18von 100
Oway Ride operates in Myanmar and suffers from fundamental problems: the app crashes constantly, there are no drivers for confirmed orders, and after updates the English version stops launching. Cases of double fare charges have been reported.
Gelobt: When a driver does accept the order, prices are lower than competitors and the booking process is intuitive.
Kritik: There is no reliable driver coverage even in busy parts of Yangon, and the app crashes on open.
Für wen: Users in Myanmar if they have a backup app
Platz 85. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 3,7★ · 1.165 Bewertungen
18von 100
Drivers systematically cancel airport orders and ask for cash payment directly, while the platform charges a cancellation fee to the passenger. Routes are deliberately planned through toll roads without notice, and support takes up to 40 minutes to respond even in emergencies.
Gelobt: For travel within China there is no alternative in terms of city coverage.
Kritik: Navigation suggests longer toll routes instead of the optimal free ones.
Für wen: China residents with no other mobile taxi option
Platz 86. Wert aus Rezensionen: 12 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 1.959 Bewertungen
12von 100
This is not a ride-hailing app. It is an AI car tuning visualizer. The app markets itself as free but locks all functionality behind a subscription before the user can try anything.
Gelobt: The concept of visualizing car modifications through AI generation is interesting to tuning enthusiasts.
Kritik: There is no way to check the quality of results before paying for a subscription.
Für wen: Car enthusiasts willing to pay for AI tuning visualization before testing it
Platz 87. Wert aus Rezensionen: 3 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 3.312 Bewertungen
3von 100
This is not a ride-hailing app. It is a remote car control utility that does not work with any vehicle brand without a separate paid manufacturer subscription. It charges money before checking compatibility.
Gelobt: The idea of a unified remote for controlling your car could be genuinely useful.
Kritik: The app charges payment before the user finds out whether their car is even compatible.
Zu den Bewertungen
Zwei Bewertungen — zwei Quellen
Sie helfen beim Vergleich von Apps, ersetzen aber nicht die Prüfung der eigenen Aufgabe.
Rezensionsbewertung · bis 100
Die gespeicherte Bewertung aus der inApp-Recherche zu den Rezensionstexten. Sie beurteilt die App im Archiv insgesamt, nicht die Zuverlässigkeit einer einzelnen Funktion.
Store-Bewertung · bis 5
Die Bewertung von der App-Seite zum Zeitpunkt der Datenerhebung. Aktuelle Bewertung und Version können abweichen.
In der archivierten Stichprobe dieses Themas: 87 Apps und 19.487 gelesene Rezensionen. Das ist der Gesamtumfang der Recherche, nicht die Zahl der Rezensionen pro App.
Ein Abstand zwischen den Bewertungen beweist keine Manipulation. Das Datum der Berechnung und die vollständige Methodik der Bewertung sind nicht im mobilen Archiv. Vergleich die Aufgabenbeschreibungen und die Originalzitate und prüf die Bedingungen in der aktuellen Version.
