Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 4.084.833 Bewertungen
68von 100
Chick-fil-A's own mobile ordering app with a strong loyalty program and consistently high in-store service. The main complaint isn't delivery, it's aggressive marketing notifications: the opt-out setting doesn't work, forcing users to block all app notifications entirely.
Gelobt
Consistent in-store service quality and a convenient points-earning system through the app.
Kritik
Notification settings are broken: promotional pushes keep arriving after being disabled in settings, leaving users no choice but to block the app altogether.
Für wen: Regular Chick-fil-A guests who want to earn points and order ahead to skip the line
Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 54.763 Bewertungen
68von 100
Food quality is consistently high, and the app generally handles mobile pre-ordering well. Limited customization and occasional technical glitches cut into the experience slightly, but the core works.
Gelobt
Ordering through the app genuinely speeds things up: you pick up your food hot, right when it's ready.
Kritik
Customizing dishes for dietary needs, allergies, bun swaps, isn't always available.
Für wen: Regular Habit Burger guests who value speed and burger quality
Wert aus Rezensionen: 67 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 33.191 Bewertungen
67von 100
Wegmans Meals 2GO handles supermarket pre-orders for pickup and gets orders ready on time, but the app doesn't communicate real-time order status or send email confirmation, leaving users to call in manually.
Gelobt
Reserving subs and prepared food in advance works reliably and saves time on busy days.
Kritik
Menu customization is limited: you can't specify bread size, request sauce on the side, or choose a pizza crust type.
Für wen: Regular Wegmans shoppers who plan lunch or dinner ahead of time
Platz 4. Wert aus Rezensionen: 66 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 103.574 Bewertungen
66von 100
Golden Corral as a buffet concept, with wide selection and friendly staff, works consistently, and guests come back. The app is weak: account login breaks right when you try to redeem a reward, though the restaurant itself is rated well.
Gelobt: A large variety of hot dishes and attentive staff make the visit worthwhile.
Kritik: The rewards program is technically unstable, login blocks you precisely when you need to redeem points.
Für wen: Families and older guests who value variety at a fixed price
Platz 5. Wert aus Rezensionen: 63 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 530.469 Bewertungen
63von 100
The anti-food-waste concept genuinely works, and most users get good products at a steep discount. The main weaknesses: bots snap up popular bags within seconds, and if the store is closed at pickup time, support offers little help.
Gelobt: The ability to get quality food at a heavily discounted price while reducing food waste.
Kritik: Automated resellers reserve bags faster than a regular user can tap the button.
Für wen: Conscious shoppers with flexible schedules and pickup points nearby
Platz 6. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 1.495.708 Bewertungen
62von 100
Pizza arrives hot and on time, and the basic ordering flow works without surprises for most users. Some friction: intrusive promotional banners when opening the app, and occasional promotional offers that don't apply automatically.
Gelobt: Pizza consistently arrives hot and within the stated time window.
Kritik: Promotional banners at app launch can't be dismissed instantly.
Für wen: Families who regularly order pizza at home
Platz 7. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 250.693 Bewertungen
62von 100
Gopuff built a convenient express delivery model from its own warehouses, which means consistently fast fulfillment in normal conditions. But when things go wrong, a courier goes unassigned with no warning, and support only offers a chatbot with no real resolution.
Gelobt: Fast delivery of snacks, drinks, and everyday essentials in under 30 minutes when a courier is available.
Kritik: The app doesn't warn you if no courier is assigned by the time the warehouse closes, the order just gets cancelled.
Für wen: City dwellers who need small purchases right now without a trip to the store
Platz 8. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 127.378 Bewertungen
62von 100
Beyond Menu does well as a storefront for local restaurants, and users find ordering easy. However, tracking breaks at critical moments, and courier delays of 30 to 60 minutes appear often enough to be a systemic issue.
Gelobt: A clean interface and direct access to a favorite local restaurant without extra intermediaries.
Kritik: Delivery tracking is unreliable exactly when the order is running late and you need it most.
Für wen: Regulars at a few favorite local restaurants who want a convenient way to order online
Platz 9. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 33.661 Bewertungen
62von 100
Dodo maintains high standards for pizza quality and speed, and brand fans stay loyal even through app glitches. The main weakness is that the nearest location's menu doesn't always match what the customer wants.
Gelobt: Pizza is consistently good, delivery is fast, and couriers are called out individually for being polite.
Kritik: You can't choose a specific restaurant for your order, the app switches addresses on its own, leading to unexpected substitutions.
Für wen: A dedicated Dodo fan who values the product more than app convenience
Platz 10. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 1.429.314 Bewertungen
60von 100
Wings are consistently praised for taste and quality, that's the brand's main asset. The app generally works, but periodically suffers widespread payment failures that block orders for many users at once.
Gelobt: Consistently good wings and a wide sauce selection.
Platz 11. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 133.921 Bewertungen
60von 100
Shipt stands out for the quality of its live shoppers, they communicate, suggest substitutes, and treat orders with care. The main issues aren't the service itself but app instability after updates and shopper shortages during peak hours.
Gelobt: Shoppers communicate in real time, confirm substitutes, and sometimes show genuine care for your order.
Kritik: When shoppers are scarce, orders get rescheduled multiple times with no notification, and you can't cancel through the app, you have to call.
Für wen: People who want a live assistant with their shopping, not just a delivery
Platz 12. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 1.528.532 Bewertungen
58von 100
Jimmy John's reputation is built on speed, and when the app works, your order really is ready fast. The problem is delivery accuracy: the wrong address sometimes gets pre-filled, there's no courier tracking, and no estimated arrival time is shown.
Gelobt: The ability to place an order ahead and pick it up without waiting at the counter.
Kritik: No courier tracking and no estimated arrival time for the order.
Für wen: Office workers who want to grab a sandwich at lunch without standing in line
Platz 13. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 39.473 Bewertungen
58von 100
The concept of ordering from multiple restaurants in one delivery works, and the food is generally high quality. But in some cases delivery runs twice as long as estimated, and support doesn't offer a real fix. The pickup flow is unreliable.
Gelobt: The ability to order dishes from different cuisines in a single delivery, great for families with different tastes.
Kritik: Contacting the courier or changing delivery instructions after placing an order isn't possible.
Für wen: Families and groups with different food preferences sharing one order
Platz 14. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 32.761 Bewertungen
58von 100
Home Chef reliably delivers quality meal kits with recipes, and busy households appreciate it, but the service occasionally fails to maintain proper temperature during delivery, and the app freezes on the launch screen and won't let you browse recipes inside.
Gelobt: Oven-ready kits with all ingredients prepped are valued for cutting out routine without sacrificing freshness.
Kritik: Meal selections don't always save: orders can silently revert to default items.
Für wen: Busy families who want to cook at home but don't have time to plan meals
Platz 15. Wert aus Rezensionen: 57 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 24.028 Bewertungen
57von 100
Green Chef delivers varied kits with well-designed recipes, and most users are happy with the food quality. The weak spot is inconsistent vegetable freshness and inflexible organic filtering in the app.
Gelobt: Recipes are straightforward, clear, and let you put a solid dinner on the table in 30 minutes.
Kritik: Organic filtering is rudimentary: you have to select organic options manually each week, there's no global preference setting.
Für wen: Busy adults who want to cook at home but don't have time to plan meals
Platz 16. Wert aus Rezensionen: 56 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 92.759 Bewertungen
56von 100
Publix Delivery works well when you get a good shopper who finds substitutes and stays in touch. But updates regularly break core features: approving substitutions, applying deals, and notifications that turn into a flood of SMS every 90 seconds.
Gelobt: Real-time chat with the shopper and the ability to influence substitutions is genuinely convenient.
Kritik: After every update, one or more basic features stop working, and shopper assignment can take over 40 minutes.
Für wen: Publix shoppers with limited mobility or packed schedules who need delivery from their preferred store
Platz 17. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.696.579 Bewertungen
55von 100
The main scenario, ordering a favorite item, earning points, quick pickup, works reliably for most users. The weak point is that the app defaults to the last-used location rather than the nearest one, and several users have accidentally placed orders at a restaurant in another city.
Gelobt: Points accumulation and fast drive-thru pickup via Chipotlane without touching the register.
Kritik: The app doesn't suggest the nearest restaurant by default and gives no warning when the selected location is unusually far away.
Für wen: Chipotle fans who have a regular location near home or work
Platz 18. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 251.792 Bewertungen
55von 100
Cava earns genuine admiration for its food, but the app frustrates: order history is buried deep, the cart resets when you try to apply a reward, and duplicating a dish isn't possible. Loyalty is held by the kitchen, not the interface.
Gelobt: Fresh, generous bowls with flexible options for plant-based eating.
Kritik: Reordering a favorite item takes five steps instead of one, and the cart resets when you try to edit it.
Für wen: Mediterranean food fans who already know what they want to order
Platz 19. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 175.004 Bewertungen
55von 100
The Jack in the Box app handles basic ordering but cuts customization short: you can't add toppings, choose a drink with a combo, or stack multiple deals in one order. Frequent sign-outs frustrate regular customers.
Gelobt: The ability to build an order in advance and pick it up at the drive-thru window without waiting.
Kritik: In-app item customization is stripped compared to the register: you can only remove ingredients, not add them.
Für wen: Regular Jack in the Box guests who prioritize speed
Platz 20. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 124.564 Bewertungen
55von 100
The pizza at Blaze is genuinely good and earns sincere praise, but the app regularly fails when you try to use earned points or request a compensation on a delivery that went wrong. Reordering goes smoothly when everything is ideal, any deviation breaks the system.
Gelobt: Fresh ingredients and fast prep make the pizza consistently good.
Kritik: There's no way to contact the restaurant directly when an ingredient shows as unavailable in the app but is actually in stock.
Für wen: Blaze Pizza regulars who order from a standard recipe and pick up in person
Platz 21. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 22.806 Bewertungen
55von 100
Snap Kitchen offers tasty prepared meals with delivery, and regulars appreciate the convenience. After a recent redesign, navigation broke on iPhone 14, the back button is hidden behind the status bar and can't be tapped.
Gelobt: Prepared meals with a solid protein balance in a convenient format for busy people.
Kritik: The menu doesn't rotate fast enough: long-term subscribers get tired of the same items.
Für wen: Health-focused eaters with no time to cook, in cities where the brand operates
Platz 22. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 17.942 Bewertungen
55von 100
People love the service itself, tasty chef-made food and a good selection. The app, however, runs into trouble: it freezes, doesn't respond when adding dishes, and is overloaded with interface elements.
Gelobt: A wide selection of dishes from different chefs, with the ability to flag ingredients you don't like.
Kritik: There's no reminder before an order is automatically sent, and cancelling one is extremely difficult.
Für wen: Busy people who want to eat well and varied at home without cooking
Platz 23. Wert aus Rezensionen: 54 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 132.750 Bewertungen
54von 100
Zomato works reliably in major Indian cities, but support floods users with templated responses for months, and order completeness remains a lottery. Delivery holds up when the address matches the pin, and loses packages or cancels orders without explanation when it doesn't.
Gelobt: A wide restaurant selection and email login make it convenient for travelers.
Kritik: Support is essentially unreachable: real questions about order errors sit unresolved for months.
Für wen: Residents of major Indian cities who are willing to tolerate inconsistent support for the wide selection
Platz 24. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 4.646.364 Bewertungen
52von 100
A grocery delivery service with a personal shopper who chats and agrees on substitutes in real time. Quality depends heavily on the individual shopper: some are attentive and punctual, others ignore instructions and leave bags on the floor without a call.
Gelobt: Live communication with the shopper during picking and the ability to swap unavailable items on the spot.
Kritik: Service quality is entirely determined by the assigned shopper, with no way to request a proven one.
Für wen: Busy people who need groceries delivered without a trip to the store
Platz 25. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.782.694 Bewertungen
52von 100
The app lets you pre-order and skip the queue, and when it works the experience is good. But navigation asks you to set a location multiple times in a row, and customization options like sauces and ice level aren't exposed in the app.
Gelobt: Convenient pre-ordering with quick pickup without waiting in line.
Kritik: You can't specify how much ice you want or which sauce to include directly in the order.
Für wen: Regular Wendy's guests who want to pick up without standing in line
Platz 26. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 124.364 Bewertungen
52von 100
Yango operates across dozens of countries with varying service levels: in some cities drivers are polite and punctual, in others they routinely decline rides, ask for extra payment, or simply don't show up. Maps are inaccurate, and there's no courier contact during food delivery.
Gelobt: In cities with a strong driver fleet, rides are comfortable and fast.
Kritik: Maps route through roads that don't exist, forcing you to give directions to the driver manually.
Für wen: Users in Africa and the Middle East where alternatives are limited
Platz 27. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 28.002 Bewertungen
52von 100
The QuikTrip convenience store app works well for coupons and quick in-store food, but authentication periodically breaks and pump payment is unstable. The product itself, food in the store, draws almost no complaints.
Gelobt: Real discounts on fuel and food, with straightforward points earning.
Kritik: The food menu is limited by the gas station format and hasn't expanded in response to requests from regulars.
Für wen: Regular QuikTrip customers who want to fill up and grab a bite without waiting in line
Platz 28. Wert aus Rezensionen: 50 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 157.314 Bewertungen
50von 100
The Carl's Jr. app is handy for basic ordering and loads quickly, but the rewards system is unreliable: coupons often get rejected or disappear after a failed checkout, and at night many restaurants don't accept mobile orders. You also can't add ingredients to an item.
Gelobt: Fast checkout for a favorite burger with basic modifications and pickup straight at the window.
Kritik: You can't add an ingredient to a menu item, only remove one, making in-app customization less capable than the register.
Für wen: Regular Carl's Jr. guests who order the same thing each time
Platz 29. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 456.789 Bewertungen
48von 100
The app handles ordering and points accumulation, but in-restaurant order accuracy is low: missing items are a recurring issue. Delivery tracking is confusing and doesn't notify you when the order arrives.
Gelobt: Promos and discounts through the app genuinely add up for regular customers.
Kritik: You can't cancel or modify an order yourself after confirming, you have to wait for support to respond.
Platz 30. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 237.228 Bewertungen
48von 100
The Applebee's app lets you place a to-go order, but the menu is poorly organized: some dishes are hard to find in the logical section, side substitutions aren't available, and payment is accepted in limited formats. Portion sizes at pickup differ from dine-in, which frustrates regular guests.
Gelobt: Food is fresh and hot at pickup, and the price is noticeably better than fast food.
Kritik: You can't swap a side dish or add special requests when ordering through the app.
Für wen: Regular Applebee's guests who want to grab their usual order without waiting in line
Platz 31. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 27.191 Bewertungen
48von 100
Foodsby solves a specific problem, a scheduled office lunch, but late arrivals and last-minute cancellations undermine exactly what the service was designed to do. The restaurant selection is gradually shrinking.
Gelobt: Convenient for corporate orders within a set work window: one order, a fixed pickup time.
Kritik: The partner restaurant pool is shrinking, and new locations aren't being added.
Für wen: Office workers with a set lunch break in cities where the service operates
Platz 32. Wert aus Rezensionen: 47 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 581.168 Bewertungen
47von 100
Orders go through fine, food is ready on time and tastes consistent, but applying rewards at checkout often throws an error, and menu navigation isn't intuitive on the first try.
Gelobt: The food at the restaurant is predictably the same visit after visit.
Kritik: The in-app rewards system behaves erratically: points accumulate, but spending them at the register doesn't work.
Für wen: Regular customers who know the menu by heart
Platz 33. Wert aus Rezensionen: 47 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 18.528 Bewertungen
47von 100
The app handles basic tasks, but the loyalty program is unreliable: points disappear or don't apply. Regular guests feel the food quality has declined.
Gelobt: Simple, clear ordering flow with no unnecessary steps.
Kritik: Customizing items within combo meals isn't supported.
Für wen: People who know Smashburger and want to order quickly without extra steps
Platz 34. Wert aus Rezensionen: 46 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 248.600 Bewertungen
46von 100
Grab dominates Southeast Asia through its combined taxi and food delivery coverage, but the algorithm sometimes deliberately slows service, drivers can cancel after accepting a ride, and the interface is cluttered with ads that get in the way of tracking your order. Batching multiple orders disrupts timing for each one.
Gelobt: Works across almost every country in Southeast Asia, great for travelers.
Kritik: Drivers and couriers can cancel an accepted order without penalty, forcing you to wait for a new one.
Für wen: Tourists and residents of Southeast Asia who want one app for transport and food
Platz 35. Wert aus Rezensionen: 46 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 41.625 Bewertungen
46von 100
Long-term subscribers note a drop in quality after the ownership change: boxes ship with errors, and the app became harder to use after the redesign, especially on tablets. The concept and recipes are still well-liked, but reliability has fallen.
Gelobt: Recipes are varied and designed for people who know how to cook and want to grow.
Kritik: After the redesign, the app hides key features and lacks a proper tablet layout.
Für wen: Experienced home cooks willing to tolerate an awkward interface for quality recipes
Platz 36. Wert aus Rezensionen: 46 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 34.444 Bewertungen
46von 100
Swiggy covers the basic food delivery need in a large market, but delivery time accuracy has dropped, support doesn't resolve incomplete order issues, and the batch delivery algorithm for small orders creates unacceptable delays.
Gelobt: The family ordering feature for orders placed from abroad and new integrations like Dukaan are well-regarded by users.
Kritik: The small-order batching system sacrifices delivery speed without telling the customer.
Für wen: Urban Indian users accustomed to delivery who are willing to accept variable timing
Platz 37. Wert aus Rezensionen: 46 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 17.355 Bewertungen
46von 100
Long-term subscribers value the ingredient quality, but delivery reliability has dropped: roughly half of recent orders arrived late or not at all. The app periodically fails to load and won't let you edit your menu.
Gelobt: Quality organic ingredients and clear recipes that make cooking enjoyable.
Kritik: You can't clear the auto-selected menu and build your box from scratch on your own.
Für wen: Health-conscious people who enjoy cooking but don't want to spend time at the grocery store
Platz 38. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 786.960 Bewertungen
44von 100
Little Caesars wins on speed and price, and when the portal ordering works correctly, pizza is ready in 15 minutes. Weak points: topping mismatch at pickup (too little cheese, wrong sauce) and the app reporting an order ready before it's actually been started.
Gelobt: Fast pickup via the Hot-N-Ready portal without waiting at the register.
Kritik: The pizza that comes out sometimes doesn't match what was selected in the app.
Für wen: Anyone who wants hot pizza in 15 minutes with no fuss
Platz 39. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 583.097 Bewertungen
44von 100
The menu and ordering flow are clear enough, but Apple Pay fails for a significant share of users, and modifications to an already-placed order aren't possible. The food is consistently good, the app isn't to blame for that.
Gelobt: The ability to schedule a pickup for a specific time in advance.
Kritik: You can't add an item or fix an order right after placing it, attempting to do so causes the app to freeze.
Platz 40. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 326.340 Bewertungen
44von 100
Noon is strong as an electronics and goods marketplace, but the food delivery section is noticeably weaker: couriers run late, changing a delivery address is difficult, and some merchants sell counterfeit goods. Genuine orders from verified sellers go through without issues.
Gelobt: Wide selection and convenient payment make it the region's top marketplace for part of the audience.
Kritik: Changing the delivery address after placing an order is nearly impossible, critical when you make a mistake.
Für wen: Shoppers in the UAE and Saudi Arabia who know trusted sellers
Platz 41. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 289.974 Bewertungen
44von 100
Yandex Go combines taxi, food, and delivery in one app, which is convenient, but support consistently fails to resolve disputes, and the interface is cluttered with ads and irrelevant sections. Delayed food couriers and boilerplate chat responses frustrate regulars.
Gelobt: Wide city coverage and fast driver dispatch under normal conditions.
Kritik: The main screen is overloaded with ads and third-party services, which gets in the way of basic order scenarios.
Für wen: Users in Russia and the CIS who want one app for taxi and food
Platz 42. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 156.770 Bewertungen
44von 100
Toast is convenient for ordering at small restaurants, but the loyalty system is unreliable: restaurants appear in the rewards catalog without actually accepting them, and the platform lets you place an order at an already-closed venue without automatically refunding you.
Gelobt: Brings hundreds of small local restaurants into one app, especially those with no ordering system of their own.
Kritik: The app doesn't check whether a restaurant is open before you place an order, which leads to lost money and waiting for nothing.
Für wen: Fans of local restaurants and independent spots
Platz 43. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 91.111 Bewertungen
44von 100
Sheetz makes good food, but the app is systematically unstable: menus fail to load, checkout freezes, and you can't split payment across multiple methods. Getting a refund for a missing or wrong order takes weeks and still ends with a gift card instead of a card refund.
Gelobt: A varied menu with milkshakes, fried food, and hot dishes draws a loyal following.
Kritik: You can't initiate a refund for an order error through the app, the process drags on for weeks with no guaranteed outcome.
Für wen: Sheetz fans who live near the chain and are willing to tolerate an unstable app for food they love
Platz 44. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 34.552 Bewertungen
44von 100
Wolt works well in cities new to the user and earns praise for its interface, but chronic courier delays and weak support when orders go wrong erode trust among regular users.
Gelobt: The app is considered the best way to order food in an unfamiliar city while traveling.
Kritik: Multi-stop delivery regularly results in food arriving cold, and support doesn't take responsibility for errors.
Für wen: Travelers and expats in European cities where Wolt operates
Platz 45. Wert aus Rezensionen: 43 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 170.206 Bewertungen
43von 100
Grubhub for Drivers gives couriers flexible scheduling and occasionally lucrative order bundles, but the deactivation system is opaque: penalties arrive without explanation, and route distances are often unprofitable. Order volume depends heavily on the zone.
Gelobt: The ability to choose your own blocks and work a flexible schedule with no fixed shifts.
Kritik: The app has no built-in navigation, couriers have to manually switch between Grubhub and a maps app for every delivery.
Platz 46. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 22.502.171 Bewertungen
42von 100
An aggregator platform with wide city and restaurant coverage, but with chronic problems in order accuracy and courier routing. Orders frequently arrive incomplete, couriers make multiple stops along the way, and support denies compensation.
Gelobt: A broad selection of restaurants and grocery stores in one place, with convenient preference personalization.
Kritik: Roughly 9 out of 10 orders arrive with item errors, and the courier batches multiple deliveries by default, letting food cool before the first stop.
Für wen: Someone who can't go out and is willing to accept order errors
Platz 47. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 425.773 Bewertungen
42von 100
The loyalty program and discounts work when the app doesn't freeze, but stability is poor: crashes, forced re-logins every day, and a broken payment scanner are common. In-store cashiers don't always accept points.
Gelobt: Accumulated points for drinks and fuel add up to real savings for regular visitors.
Kritik: The app constantly logs users out and demands re-authentication, which is frustrating at the register.
Für wen: Drivers who stop at the station frequently
Platz 48. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 321.757 Bewertungen
42von 100
Talabat covers a wide restaurant network across the Middle East, but delivery reliability and support quality draw serious complaints. Cancelled orders with no refund and boilerplate support responses appear in reviews regularly.
Gelobt: A large restaurant selection and generally respected delivery time estimates.
Kritik: Support doesn't actually resolve issues, it replies with the same template regardless of the question.
Für wen: UAE and Kuwait residents who prioritize restaurant coverage and can tolerate unpredictable service
Platz 49. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 31.535 Bewertungen
42von 100
Jollibee earns genuine love for its signature chicken and Filipino food, but the app regularly freezes at payment, loses loyalty points, and can't locate nearby branches in some markets.
Gelobt: The unique flavor of the food, especially Chickenjoy, creates a strong emotional bond with the brand.
Kritik: The rewards system loses accumulated points after reinstallation and doesn't let the account recover properly.
Für wen: Brand fans in the diaspora and the Philippine market who order despite the technical issues
Platz 50. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 22.170 Bewertungen
42von 100
Ritual is designed for queue-free pickup, but the app often freezes, the partner restaurant list keeps shrinking, and the pay-and-walk-in mechanic doesn't always work. The value depends heavily on the city.
Gelobt: The points system is simple and actually works for regulars.
Kritik: The number of partner venues is falling, and in many cities there's little left to choose from.
Für wen: Office workers in major cities where a Ritual-network cafe is nearby
Platz 51. Wert aus Rezensionen: 41 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.589.465 Bewertungen
41von 100
This app is aimed at shopper partners, not recipients. The main complaints from shoppers: in-store product location maps removed after an update, inflated distance data, and difficulty getting support in non-standard situations.
Gelobt: Flexible scheduling: you can work any time you want with no fixed shifts.
Kritik: The update removed the in-aisle product location map, which increased picking time.
Für wen: Shopper partners looking for flexible gig income
Platz 52. Wert aus Rezensionen: 41 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 237.188 Bewertungen
41von 100
Factor prepares quality meals that users who've tried them enjoy, but the service undermines itself: the auto-selected menu for a skipped week guesses poorly, support is slow or unhelpful, and the app breaks regularly when selecting meals. The subscription model amplifies frustration when things go wrong.
Gelobt: Meals arrive fresh, chilled, and good, especially the classic menu items.
Kritik: Auto-selection for a skipped week ignores saved preferences and sends a repetitive, uninspired menu.
Für wen: Busy singles or couples who want prepared food without a grocery trip and know how to manage a subscription
Platz 53. Wert aus Rezensionen: 41 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 198.330 Bewertungen
41von 100
Careem holds on as the only large super-app in the region: rides, food, and delivery in one place. Driver quality is inconsistent, the interface is cluttered and frequently glitchy, and address detection is imprecise.
Gelobt: Wide MENA market coverage and the ability to combine a ride, food, and delivery in one app.
Kritik: Driver routes are illogical, there's no multi-stop support, which is a basic feature on every competing app.
Für wen: Middle East residents with no alternatives
Platz 54. Wert aus Rezensionen: 41 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 78.511 Bewertungen
41von 100
The food consistently draws praise, but the app is broken enough at the sign-in and points stage that many users switch to the website or guest mode. Brand loyalty is held by the kitchen quality, not the app.
Gelobt: The chicken salad and the atmosphere of the restaurants make people genuinely want to come back.
Kritik: The loyalty system doesn't work as promised: receipt scans don't register, and points disappear.
Für wen: Regular guests of the restaurant who are willing to put up with a broken app
Platz 55. Wert aus Rezensionen: 40 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 99.776 Bewertungen
40von 100
PedidosYa systematically delivers incomplete orders, deliveries run an hour or more late, and support is effectively unreachable. Payment through the app fails intermittently, courier chat freezes, and users simply can't track their order or resolve issues.
Gelobt: At best, the order arrives quickly and without complaints.
Kritik: Incomplete orders are common, and there's no working mechanism inside the app to dispute the situation.
Für wen: Residents of major Latin American cities who need delivery and have no alternative in their market
Platz 56. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 4.616.573 Bewertungen
38von 100
A restaurant delivery platform focused on convenient ordering, but with growing logistics problems. Couriers take multiple orders at once, food arrives cold, GPS frequently can't find the address, and dark mode was removed without explanation.
Gelobt: When things work smoothly, the order arrives on time, and support sometimes compensates for delivery to the wrong address.
Kritik: Couriers wait for additional orders before leaving, so if yours was first, the food arrives cold.
Für wen: Office workers who need lunch delivered from a specific nearby restaurant
Platz 57. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 1.976.639 Bewertungen
38von 100
Yelp has long outgrown food delivery and become a review aggregator for everything from campgrounds to realtors. As a restaurant discovery tool it works, but list navigation broke for many users after the last update.
Gelobt: Years of personal restaurant lists with visit history built up over time.
Kritik: Sorting and filtering within personal lists breaks regularly after updates.
Für wen: People who enjoy curating restaurant guides
Platz 58. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 719.159 Bewertungen
38von 100
The app is convenient for placing an order itself, but delivery tracking effectively doesn't work: users get no notifications about the courier and don't know when to expect food. Support is unreachable when there's a problem.
Gelobt: Fast and easy to place an order at a local pizzeria without calling.
Kritik: No working courier tracking: users don't know if the driver has left or when to expect delivery.
Platz 59. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 307.315 Bewertungen
38von 100
Favor was historically valued as a reliable Texas alternative to the big aggregators, but the switch to pre-tipped checkout and a rise in non-delivery incidents have seriously eroded user trust. Roughly 75% of orders end in delivery problems for some users.
Gelobt: H-E-B integration makes grocery ordering convenient for Texas residents.
Kritik: Couriers started ignoring delivery instructions after the switch to the pre-tipped system.
Für wen: Residents of major Texas cities who need H-E-B delivery and have no alternatives
Platz 60. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 170.770 Bewertungen
38von 100
After the DoorDash acquisition, Caviar became essentially a DoorDash wrapper with a pricier interface: delivery windows are missed, items disappear from orders, and support stopped reordering on problems. Restaurant selection remains a strong point.
Gelobt: The best restaurant catalog in its segment, especially smaller and unconventional city spots.
Kritik: After selecting a restaurant from the list, the app resets the scroll position to the top, annoying when browsing the menu a second time.
Für wen: Food enthusiasts looking for rare spots not available on other platforms
Platz 61. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 123.783 Bewertungen
38von 100
Red Lobster Dining Rewards exists as a loyalty app but doesn't let you order inside, it sends you to a website that locks accounts, and in-app promotions are unknown to restaurant staff. The app's product value is near zero despite genuinely good food.
Gelobt: Seafood dishes appeal to regular guests, and a good server makes the visit memorable.
Kritik: The app doesn't support ordering and isn't synced with real menu items or in-restaurant promotions.
Für wen: Devoted Red Lobster guests who want to earn points and are willing to deal with a clunky interface
Platz 62. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 67.961 Bewertungen
38von 100
The service is convenient for people who don't want to plan meals, but ingredient quality has declined: portions have shrunk, vegetables arrive spoiled, and individual dishes occasionally ship without a key component. Cancelling a subscription is hard, and support goes quiet.
Gelobt: A wide recipe selection and predictable deliveries eliminate daily meal planning.
Kritik: Box completeness is inconsistent: orders sometimes arrive missing meat or with spoiled produce.
Für wen: Busy people who value saving time on meal prep
Platz 63. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 37.211 Bewertungen
38von 100
Users love the product itself, but the app systematically breaks the ordering flow: slow payment processing, frequent sign-outs, and unresponsive buttons. The digital channel pushes customers away rather than helping them.
Gelobt: The product and in-store staff receive genuine warmth from regulars.
Kritik: Reordering was made more complicated, not simpler, and purchase history disappears when the app forces a sign-out.
Für wen: Brand fans willing to put up with a broken digital channel
Platz 64. Wert aus Rezensionen: 36 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 10.488.710 Bewertungen
36von 100
A large food and grocery delivery platform with global reach, but with systemic courier assignment problems: cyclists pick up orders several kilometers from the restaurant, orders vanish without warning, and delivery to the wrong address happens regularly.
Gelobt: A wide selection of restaurants and stores, with round-the-clock availability in most cities.
Kritik: The courier assignment algorithm doesn't account for distance to the restaurant, so food starts cooling before the first stop.
Für wen: City dwellers who need food or groceries at night with no alternatives
Platz 65. Wert aus Rezensionen: 36 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 496.961 Bewertungen
36von 100
Orders consistently run an hour or more late, arrive cold, and support cuts off the chat instead of helping. Courier tracking lags behind competitors and frequently misleads.
Gelobt: A wide selection of local restaurants in one place with order history.
Kritik: Delivery time estimates are unreliable: orders run late, get rescheduled multiple times, and often get cancelled without notice.
Für wen: New Yorkers with a credit card subscription and a lot of patience
Platz 66. Wert aus Rezensionen: 36 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 33.317 Bewertungen
36von 100
Delivery.com, rebranded as Order, lost reliability after the change: restaurants don't accept orders through the renamed platform, cancelled orders don't get refunded, and the technical side has degraded. A small loyal base appreciates historically low commissions and niche categories like laundry and alcohol.
Gelobt: Niche delivery categories unavailable on competing platforms, and historically lower menu markups.
Kritik: After the rebrand, restaurants frequently don't fulfill orders, and support can't fix the problem.
Für wen: A regular user in a specific city where the platform still runs reliably
Platz 67. Wert aus Rezensionen: 36 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 20.004 Bewertungen
36von 100
Fantuan positions itself as a platform for Asian food with attractive deals, but the actual logistics frequently break down: couriers head in the wrong direction, restaurants in the catalog don't exist, and refunds land in an internal wallet.
Gelobt: A wide selection of Asian restaurants and student discounts in university cities.
Kritik: Coordination between the platform and restaurants is weak: orders get lost, and the customer is left to sort it out themselves.
Für wen: Students and diaspora members looking for Asian food with coupons, willing to accept an inconsistent service
Platz 68. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 159.774 Bewertungen
35von 100
7NOW delivers items from the nearest 7-Eleven, but fulfillment accuracy is unstable: drivers mark orders as delivered without actually showing up, the catalog doesn't reflect actual in-store inventory, and the app breaks after updates.
Gelobt: Round-the-clock delivery of drinks, snacks, and everyday items from a store practically next door.
Kritik: You can't choose a specific store manually, the app assigns the nearest one automatically, even if it has persistent inventory issues.
Für wen: Anyone who urgently needs a snack or a convenience item delivered
Platz 69. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 39.592 Bewertungen
35von 100
This is a courier app, not a customer app: reviews describe problems with the order assignment algorithm, rating penalties for technical glitches, and insufficient pay on demanding routes. There's not enough data here to assess the end-customer experience.
Gelobt: For new couriers the app is relatively easy to get started with, and you can begin working quickly.
Kritik: The courier rating is penalized for the app's own failures, which creates an unfair evaluation system.
Für wen: Couriers in Texas looking for flexible part-time work
Platz 70. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 21.043 Bewertungen
35von 100
HungryPanda remains the primary choice for Asian food among diaspora communities, but delivery quality is unpredictable: orders run late, support ignores problems, and hidden fees appear at checkout.
Gelobt: A wide selection of authentic Chinese, Japanese, and Asian restaurants in US and UK cities.
Kritik: Courier tracking behaves erratically, and getting a refund after a problematic delivery is nearly impossible.
Für wen: Chinese-speaking users abroad who want access to familiar cuisine
Platz 71. Wert aus Rezensionen: 34 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 250.442 Bewertungen
34von 100
Foodpanda covers Asian markets and operates as an aggregator, but couriers regularly run late or cancel orders, restaurant inventory isn't synced with the app, and customers can't cancel an order. Delivery status notifications are unreliable.
Gelobt: Wide restaurant and store coverage, including locations in smaller Asian cities.
Kritik: A courier can decline an order after being assigned, and finding a new one can take another hour.
Für wen: Residents of Asian cities with limited alternative services
Platz 72. Wert aus Rezensionen: 33 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 520.571 Bewertungen
33von 100
The app isn't synced with real restaurant menus, payment data doesn't save between sessions, and Facebook login breaks regularly. Order customization is extremely limited.
Gelobt: When everything works, it's convenient to plan a pickup in advance and use discounts.
Kritik: The app accepts orders for items that aren't available at a specific location, with no one able to fix the situation.
Für wen: An occasional visitor to a specific good Arby's near home
Platz 73. Wert aus Rezensionen: 33 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 227.882 Bewertungen
33von 100
Glovo is present across multiple markets in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East, but consistently fails when things go wrong: refunds for store errors take weeks, support can't cancel an order, and cancellation fees are charged even when Glovo itself initiated the cancellation. Reliability doesn't meet the standard of major aggregators.
Gelobt: Fast delivery in standard situations and availability in cities where DoorDash or Uber Eats aren't present.
Kritik: Support can't refund an incomplete order or cancel an order with a restaurant-side error.
Für wen: Users outside the US who don't have access to major Western aggregators
Platz 74. Wert aus Rezensionen: 33 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 32.816 Bewertungen
33von 100
The food at Jason's Deli earns genuine affection, but the app systematically prevents you from ordering it: it freezes at payment, won't let you reset your password, loses loyalty points, and doesn't support basic sandwich customization.
Gelobt: Product quality, freshness, the salad bar, and signature sandwiches create real attachment to the chain.
Kritik: The sandwich builder doesn't let you put together simple combinations like a BLT that exist on the physical menu.
Für wen: Regular guests who prefer ordering by phone or directly at the counter
Platz 75. Wert aus Rezensionen: 33 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 20.111 Bewertungen
33von 100
Lieferando is Germany's largest delivery aggregator, but orders are routinely marked as delivered without an actual delivery, support responds with a bot and resolves nothing. Restaurant ratings on the platform often don't reflect reality.
Gelobt: Wide coverage across German cities and a clean interface, even for non-German-speaking expats.
Kritik: There's no working dispute tool: no refunds, no live agent, no transparent order status.
Für wen: German residents who need food delivery with no alternative in their city
Platz 76. Wert aus Rezensionen: 32 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 2.461.344 Bewertungen
32von 100
The DoorDash courier app suffers from an opaque order distribution algorithm. Platinum status doesn't translate into real pay advantages, navigation suggests unnecessarily long routes, and wait times are unpredictable regardless of how busy it is.
Gelobt: With a steady flow of orders and smart timing, the app lets you earn without being tied to a schedule.
Kritik: The order distribution algorithm is opaque: Platinum couriers get the same low-paying orders as newcomers.
Für wen: Couriers with their own vehicle looking for flexible part-time work in their city
Platz 77. Wert aus Rezensionen: 32 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 89.641 Bewertungen
32von 100
Denny's updates its app so frequently and so poorly that each new release breaks something that worked before: can't sign in, menu won't load, earned points disappear. The chain itself is liked, but the digital channel has become a source of frustration.
Gelobt: The food at Denny's restaurants, especially breakfasts and signature dishes, is appreciated by guests.
Kritik: You can't exclude an ingredient from an order, the delivery address doesn't update when your location changes, and there's no way to flag an error to the store through the app.
Für wen: Regular Denny's guests who prefer dining in and only use the app to browse the menu
Platz 78. Wert aus Rezensionen: 31 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 25.075 Bewertungen
31von 100
ChowNow regularly delivers orders an hour or more late, couriers take winding routes between addresses, and support is either unreachable or gives templated responses. Delivered to the wrong address with no refund.
Gelobt: Direct support for local restaurants without large platform commissions on the restaurant side.
Kritik: No real-time courier tracking and no order readiness updates.
Für wen: People who want to support local restaurants on principle and are willing to wait
Platz 79. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 4.981.903 Bewertungen
30von 100
A Domino's pizza ordering app with a delivery tracker and points program, but after the interface redesign reliability collapsed. Payment fails, the tracker shows the wrong status, and reordering became a multi-step process instead of one tap.
Gelobt: A points program and clear pizza customization when the app is working properly.
Kritik: After the interface update you can't quickly repeat a saved order, and the delivery tracker shows the wrong status.
Für wen: A regular Domino's customer who orders the same thing every week
Platz 80. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.135.623 Bewertungen
30von 100
The app periodically won't let you add items to the cart, defaults to a previous location instead of the nearest one, and doesn't let you modify or add to an already-placed order. People who actually get their food rarely complain about it.
Gelobt: Automatic check-in when you're at the restaurant and convenient menu browsing.
Kritik: You can't add an item to an already-placed order even a few minutes before it's ready.
Für wen: Young regulars who live near a Taco Bell and visit often
Platz 81. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 39.311 Bewertungen
30von 100
Orders arrive with the wrong menu item, couriers are systematically late, and delivery zones are restricted in the evening. The call-center support isn't sufficient for the volume of complaints.
Gelobt: In-app promotions and discounts attract users who actively take advantage of them.
Kritik: Order accuracy is low: the wrong size or item is delivered frequently.
Für wen: Iraqi residents with few alternative delivery services available
Platz 82. Wert aus Rezensionen: 29 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 634.714 Bewertungen
29von 100
The app's main feature, in-app trivia for earning rewards, stops working for weeks at a time, and account login breaks periodically. Order errors are found both in the app and at pickup.
Gelobt: The app looks clean and modern on the surface.
Kritik: The core loyalty mechanic, trivia and points earning, goes down for extended periods without explanation.
Für wen: Wing fans willing to tolerate an unstable loyalty program
Platz 83. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 7.728.998 Bewertungen
28von 100
The McDonald's app for mobile ordering and the loyalty program chronically fails to load on time, loses points after a promo is applied, and signs users out. The main scenario fails: showing the code at the register doesn't work because the app freezes at exactly the wrong moment.
Gelobt: Earning and spending points on favorite menu items when the internet connection is stable.
Kritik: The app opens so slowly you have to launch it several minutes before arriving at the restaurant, or the code won't load in time.
Für wen: A regular McDonald's visitor willing to wrestle with the app for discounts
Platz 84. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.190.236 Bewertungen
28von 100
Subway completely rebuilt its app, and the result is worse than what came before: you can't combine a gift card balance with another payment method, profiles don't save, and the app demands an update almost every visit. People love the sandwiches, but the app gets in the way.
Gelobt: The ability to build a sandwich with the ingredients you want ahead of time and skip the line.
Kritik: You can't use a remaining gift card balance alongside another payment method.
Für wen: Regular Subway guests who want to skip the queue
Platz 85. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 202.472 Bewertungen
28von 100
Deliveroo systematically misses delivery windows: orders run an hour or more late, the time estimate updates several times without explanation, and support doesn't solve problems. Order accuracy is also off, wrong items appear regularly.
Gelobt: When the courier arrives on time, the food is hot and the delivery works exactly as it should.
Kritik: Contacting the courier or restaurant is nearly impossible: drivers ask for the address by phone even though it's already in the order.
Für wen: Those willing to wait and accept the risk of an inaccurate order
Platz 86. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 31.093 Bewertungen
28von 100
Yemeksepeti receives systematic complaints about incomplete and wrong orders, no real support, and the inability to cancel an order after one minute. For tourists the platform is additionally inaccessible due to a Turkish phone number requirement.
Gelobt: Delivery speed in individual cases is rated highly, and niche discounts attract part of the audience.
Kritik: Support doesn't take responsibility for restaurant errors and closes tickets without resolution.
Für wen: A local user in Turkey with no alternative platforms in their area
Platz 87. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 29.783 Bewertungen
28von 100
Couriers go missing or carry multiple orders at once, food arrives cold or not at all. Support is slow, and compensation only comes back as app-wallet credit.
Gelobt: Prices on some items are lower than on competing services.
Kritik: Logistics can't handle peak demand: there aren't enough couriers, and delivery order is opaque.
Für wen: Riyadh residents willing to accept unpredictable wait times in exchange for discounts
Platz 89. Wert aus Rezensionen: 25 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 4.228.902 Bewertungen
25von 100
The Pizza Hut ordering and delivery tracking app consistently fails at basic scenarios. You can't sign in, tracking breaks after updates, points expire every six months, and random taps add items to the cart without confirmation.
Gelobt: Bundle deals let you put together a large family order at a good price.
Kritik: After every major update, either authentication, delivery tracking, or order history stops working.
Für wen: A family that orders pizza weekly and is willing to call in when the app fails
Platz 90. Wert aus Rezensionen: 25 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 180.331 Bewertungen
25von 100
HungerStation regularly fails on delivery: orders run late, arrive cold, or don't arrive at all, and drivers cancel without consequences. Support responds with boilerplate apologies and doesn't issue refunds.
Gelobt: Wide restaurant selection and a familiar interface for regular Saudi users.
Kritik: There's no direct in-app channel to reach the restaurant, so clarifying or adjusting an order is impossible.
Für wen: Loyal users in the KSA market with no better alternative
Platz 91. Wert aus Rezensionen: 25 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 42.481 Bewertungen
25von 100
Couriers mark orders as delivered without showing up, and support has been replaced by a bot that stalls and resolves nothing. Delivery is consistently late, and money is only returned after threatening to file a complaint.
Gelobt: Good restaurant coverage and first-order discounts attract new users.
Kritik: Support can't resolve an order dispute without a lengthy back-and-forth and escalation.
Für wen: Middle East users who have no more reliable alternative
Platz 92. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 2.626.235 Bewertungen
22von 100
The Sonic pre-ordering and drink discount app fails at the one thing people download it for. In-app payment fails in about half of cases, authentication breaks after updates, and promo points can't be applied even with the right items in the cart.
Gelobt: When the app works, the 50% drink discount during Happy Hour genuinely saves money.
Kritik: In-app payment fails so often that people drive to Sonic and can't order at the discount they came for.
Für wen: A regular Sonic visitor willing to restart the app several times for a drink discount
Platz 93. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 84.061 Bewertungen
22von 100
Couriers mark orders as delivered without showing up, and support closes the chat instead of helping. Orders sit for hours without a courier, and missing money only comes back as platform credits.
Gelobt: Wide city coverage and fast delivery when the system works without issues.
Kritik: No real buyer protection when an order goes missing or arrives wrong.
Für wen: Patient Latin American residents with no better alternative
Platz 94. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 61.931 Bewertungen
18von 100
The app regularly won't let you sign in, fails to process orders, and throws technical errors, while restaurants don't see the orders on their end. At this reliability level, the app can't fulfill its basic purpose.
Gelobt: The food and in-restaurant service consistently earn high marks from guests who make it to the restaurant.
Kritik: Online ordering is so unreliable it's easier to call the restaurant directly.
Für wen: Restaurant guests who prefer to order by phone rather than through the app
Zu den Bewertungen
Zwei Bewertungen — zwei Quellen
Sie helfen beim Vergleich von Apps, ersetzen aber nicht die Prüfung der eigenen Aufgabe.
Rezensionsbewertung · bis 100
Die gespeicherte Bewertung aus der inApp-Recherche zu den Rezensionstexten. Sie beurteilt die App im Archiv insgesamt, nicht die Zuverlässigkeit einer einzelnen Funktion.
Store-Bewertung · bis 5
Die Bewertung von der App-Seite zum Zeitpunkt der Datenerhebung. Aktuelle Bewertung und Version können abweichen.
In der archivierten Stichprobe dieses Themas: 94 Apps und 32.989 gelesene Rezensionen. Das ist der Gesamtumfang der Recherche, nicht die Zahl der Rezensionen pro App.
Ein Abstand zwischen den Bewertungen beweist keine Manipulation. Das Datum der Berechnung und die vollständige Methodik der Bewertung sind nicht im mobilen Archiv. Vergleich die Aufgabenbeschreibungen und die Originalzitate und prüf die Bedingungen in der aktuellen Version.
