Astrospheric
- 72 of 100 · reviews
- 4.8of 5 · store
- 438ratings on the App Store
- 222reviews read
An editorial reading of the saved reviews
Astrophotographers love it for accurate cloud and seeing forecasts: it saves wasted evenings and helps decide whether to shoot in Ha or Oiii by conditions. It stumbles on local accuracy and stability: temperature runs 8-12 degrees off for some, cloud forecasts occasionally miss, and the free version is less accurate and nudges toward a subscription. Plus the network sometimes breaks and the main page reloads endlessly.
Screenshots
What people use it for
Astrophotographers and observers who plan trips by weather and cloud cover and will pay for accuracy
What reviews praise
Accurate cloud and seeing forecasts, planning imaging sessions without wasted setups, everything needed in one place, choosing filter by seeing, handier than the old cleardarksky
What reviews complain about
Temperature off by 8-12 degrees in some regions, cloud forecast occasionally inaccurate, free version noticeably less accurate, network errors and endless main-page reloading, dark hard-to-read interface, no widgets
What users experience
1 excerpt from the breakdown. These are individual cases, not a verdict on all users.
I’ve used Astrospheric for years and love nearly everything about it it’s an incredible tool for planning astrophotography. However, the temperature data for Arizona is consistently 8 12°F too low, making dew and temperature planning unreliable. Other apps are accurate within 1°F. Please fix or im
Mentioned for these jobs
Other apps in this topic
This is material from the inApp archive. Before installing, check the app’s current terms and features in the store.