AI Homework & Math Solver · 48 apps · 11 682 avis lus
Les textes sur les apps sont en anglais.
Where the photo reads and the answer is correct and shown step by step, and where the solution is wrong and the answer is bare. Les meilleures notes d’après le texte des avis : Studdy (68/100), Symbolab (62) et MathGPT (62).
Note des avis : 68 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 12 751 notes
68sur 100
Its strength is explaining step by step instead of just handing over an answer, and many say they genuinely started to understand the material and prepared for a test. The weak spot is accuracy: it sometimes gives a wrong answer and you have to regenerate a few times, and the constant asking whether you liked the response is annoying. They also cut the number of free tries.
Points forts
Step-by-step breakdowns that teach understanding, a personal-tutor feel, test prep, Algebra I help
Reproches
Sometimes a wrong answer and you have to regenerate, nagging asking whether you liked the response, fewer free tries, a separate subscription for the web version
Pour qui : Students who want to understand a topic and prep for tests with step-by-step explanations
Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 26 100 notes
62sur 100
People value the clear step-by-step explanations and graphing, and many say they finally understand the material. It breaks down on higher math: complex integrals and some Calc 2 problems aren't supported, answers are sometimes wrong, and the camera doesn't always read the problem. A separate frustration is that the useful practice section from the website is missing in the app.
Points forts
Clear step-by-step explanations, graphing, algebra help, the feeling of actually understanding the material
Reproches
Struggles with hard integrals and some Calc 2 problems, occasionally gives wrong answers, camera doesn't always read the problem, no proper iPad keyboard, practice section only on the website
Pour qui : Students working on algebra and basic courses who want to understand the steps, not just get an answer
Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 5 039 notes
62sur 100
Its strength is detailed explanations and short video breakdowns of topics, helping people prep for tests and review material after university. But it consistently fails geometry, roughly a third of problems come back wrong, and formulas sometimes render broken as 'frac5/'. The sticky scroll and lack of a proper iPad version also annoy users.
Points forts
Detailed explanations, video topic breakdowns, custom practice problems per topic, help with exams and review
Reproches
Struggles with geometry, about a third of answers wrong, broken formula rendering, sticky scrolling, no iPad version
Pour qui : Students who need algebra walkthroughs and video topic explanations, but not for geometry
Rang 4. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 2 334 notes
62sur 100
Kids love how simple it is: snap the question, get a breakdown, and it genuinely lifts their grades. It breaks on money: the promised free use hits a 3-try wall then demands a subscription, and some people report charges even after cancelling the trial.
Rang 5. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 1 520 notes
62sur 100
As a graphing-calculator replacement it's strong: it offers adjustable step depth and handles algebra well. The main pain is input on iPad: no landscape or Split View, so you have to rotate the tablet, and the system keyboard with no spacebar or symbols is a struggle for entering formulas.
Points forts : Step-by-step solutions with adjustable depth, works like a graphing calculator, good for algebra, useful for students and educators
Reproches : No iPad landscape mode, awkward system keyboard missing key symbols, loses history on restart, occasionally wrong answers
Pour qui : Algebra and higher-math students who work mostly from a phone
Rang 6. Note des avis : 60 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 1 159 notes
60sur 100
For AP, SAT and IB prep it's genuinely praised: mock exams, the Questt question bank and topic breakdowns help students feel more confident before the test. It breaks on small learning frictions: the Duolingo-style locked sections get in the way of jumping to the topics you need, and the AI sometimes marks a correct answer wrong and takes away hearts.
Points forts : AP, SAT and IB prep, mock exams and the Questt question bank, topic breakdowns, responsive support
Reproches : Duolingo-style locked sections hinder studying, AI marks correct answers wrong, flood of notifications, only sample after paying
Pour qui : High schoolers and students preparing for AP, SAT or IB
Rang 7. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 1 442 312 notes
58sur 100
People value the clear step-by-step breakdowns and help across many subjects, and some genuinely raised their math grades over the summer. But accuracy is inconsistent, it often gets geometry and graphs wrong, and the ads, constant Plus upsells and connection drops are irritating.
Points forts : Clear step-by-step explanations, help across many subjects, genuinely raises math grades
Reproches : Wrong answers on geometry and graphs, pushy ads and Plus prompts, connection failures while scanning
Pour qui : Students who need homework help in math and other subjects with a step-by-step walkthrough
Rang 8. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 20 155 notes
58sur 100
People praise it for giving step-by-step answers with charts and not demanding money on the first screen. But you only get a couple of free tries, then everything is locked behind payment with no daily reset, and that's the main complaint. Accuracy wobbles: reviews say it confuses fractions and stubbornly repeats one wrong answer, in one case leading to a failed quiz.
Points forts : Step-by-step answers with charts, doesn't ask for payment right away, simple to use
Reproches : Only a couple of free questions before a hard payment wall, limit on photos, confuses fractions, repeats a wrong answer
Pour qui : People who want a quick look at a solution and are willing to pay for ongoing use
Rang 9. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 4 745 notes
58sur 100
Users value the mode that teaches first and gives the answer after, short clear explanations, and help with last-minute assignments across subjects. But it often errs on math and geometry (one user's sister got an F after double-checking), the app freezes, crashes, and sometimes shows a black screen instead of the photo. Explanations also leak discarded wrong steps like 'wait not right'.
Points forts : Teach-first-then-answer mode, short clear explanations, help across subjects, feels like talking to a friend
Reproches : Errors in math and geometry, freezing and crashes, black screen instead of photo, junk steps in explanations, paywall on photo uploads
Pour qui : Students who want both to understand a topic and finish a last-minute humanities assignment
Rang 10. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 166 286 notes
55sur 100
It really helps with tests and multiple-choice questions, letting you quickly clear a pile of missed assignments and understand what you were stuck on. The weak spot is that it gets some answers wrong, the question limit runs out fast, and cancelling the subscription or getting a refund becomes a nightmare with silent support.
Points forts : Helps with tests and multiple-choice questions, clears a lot of assignments fast, explains problems from a photo
Reproches : Wrong answers on some assignments, question limit runs out fast, impossible to cancel the subscription, unresponsive support
Pour qui : Students who need to quickly clear tests and multiple-choice assignments, especially in an end-of-quarter crunch
Rang 11. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 948 notes
55sur 100
People value that it explains the solution step by step and helps check homework and find where you went wrong, rather than just handing over an answer. But answers are regularly wrong, and for questions with several parts it only answers one part. It used to give free credits, now free access is just one to five problems a day and the rest costs money, which makes long-time users angry.
Points forts : Explains the solution step by step, helps check homework and find where you went wrong, clear reasoning in the breakdown, saves students time
Reproches : Answers are often wrong, only answers one part of multi-part questions, the free limit was cut to one to five problems a day, no Arabic language
Pour qui : Students who need to check their solution and understand the steps rather than blindly copy an answer
Rang 12. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 4 073 notes
52sur 100
Praised for step-by-step answers, a free video explanation, and coverage of many subjects, and it helped some pull an A. But it often errs on math (users report 'wrong 80% of the time'), is factually stale (thinks it's still 2024, calls Biden president), runs slowly, and pads answers with extra text. Answers run longer than asked and free tries are limited.
Points forts : Step-by-step answers, free video explanation, coverage across subjects, few ads
Reproches : Frequent math errors, stale facts, slow performance, overly long answers, few free tries
Pour qui : Students who want step-by-step walkthroughs with video and don't need flawless math accuracy
Rang 13. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 1 147 notes
52sur 100
People like that it shows how to solve rather than just handing over the answer, and it carries them through regular math. It breaks on geometry, where it spits out random wrong numbers, and on ads: there are so many that one review complains about a fake-virus banner, plus free tries run out fast and you hit the coin wall.
Points forts : Shows the solving steps not just the answer, helps with regular math, simple and easy
Reproches : Wrong geometry answers, way too many ads including scary banners, few free tries, network errors even on premium
Pour qui : Students who want to understand the solution for regular math and don't mind ads
Rang 14. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 901 notes
52sur 100
Its strength is studying from your own class materials, the app builds tests from them and gets praised for attention to detail on every screen. But the mobile version keeps hanging on a black loading screen, and quizzes made on a computer do not carry over to the phone, forcing a rebuild. The Canvas import pulls in old classes from last year, and billing and subscriptions have a life of their own, charging money even after cancellation.
Points forts : Studying from your own class materials, generates tests relevant to your topics, easiest to use, attention to detail on every screen
Reproches : The mobile app hangs on a black loading screen, quizzes from the computer do not sync to the phone, the Canvas import pulls in old classes from last year, money is charged even after canceling the subscription, no iPad support
Pour qui : Students who want to prepare from their own course materials and build tests from them
Rang 15. Note des avis : 50 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 8 811 notes
50sur 100
It gives correct step-by-step answers from a photo of the problem, and when it lands, it genuinely helps you understand and finish homework. Ads ruin it: a clip after every photo, on exit and return, for many every half-minute, and that's the unanimous complaint. On top of that, after the ownership change from Gauth, recognition quality dropped and a payment wall appeared.
Points forts : Correct step-by-step answers from a photo, clear breakdowns, homework and study help
Reproches : Ads after every photo and on returning to the app, recognition quality dropped after the switch to MathAce, some features moved behind payment
Pour qui : People who photograph a problem and can put up with frequent ads for a free answer
Rang 16. Note des avis : 50 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 2 928 notes
50sur 100
Users value that it explains the working, not just the final answer, and some verified calculus steps against an answer key while the function-graph breakdown gets praise. But for many the scanner returns a blurry photo or replies 'can't solve' to an ordinary problem, answers take up to 5 minutes or never appear, and the whole app sits behind a paywall with no free entry. There are also complaints about charges after cancellation.
Points forts : Explains the working, function-graph breakdown, reliable calculus steps for some users
Reproches : Blurry scanner and refusing simple problems, answers taking up to 5 minutes or never, everything behind a paywall with no free entry, charges after cancellation
Pour qui : Math students willing to pay upfront for a worked-out solution rather than just the answer
Rang 17. Note des avis : 50 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 1 613 notes
50sur 100
For algebra and step-by-step solutions it genuinely helps and explains, which even the 'cheating' crowd appreciates. It breaks on reliability: it can spit out up to 18 different answers for one problem, doesn't handle word equations, and you have to close and reopen the app every time to move to the next question.
Points forts : Step-by-step algebra explanations, helps understand the problem, has a free mode, handy for people with disabilities
Reproches : Different answers for one problem, wrong on tests, no word equations, must restart for a new question, paywall after a couple of problems
Pour qui : Algebra students who care about step-by-step explanations, not just the answer
Rang 18. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 10 717 notes
48sur 100
When it works, it gives accurate answers with explanations and saves hours of homework. But accuracy wobbles, and the main trouble is billing: people are promised 4.99 and charged 59.99, a purchased yearly plan stops working, and there's no support. Also, you get only two free solves before a wall, and premium is sometimes limited to math only.
Points forts : Accurate answers with explanations, saves hours of homework, clear breakdowns, easy to use
Reproches : Charged more than promised, a purchased yearly plan stops working, no support, only two free solves, premium sometimes math-only
Pour qui : Students who need quick homework help and are willing to risk the billing
Rang 19. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 1 402 notes
48sur 100
For algebra and simple math it helps, and some people prefer it over Photomath because it explains solutions. It breaks on geometry and formula accuracy, and the free tries burn out fast: 'energy' is spent on every problem and without premium you get cut off.
Points forts : Helps with algebra and simple math, explains solutions, some prefer it over Photomath
Reproches : Weak geometry and formulas, occasionally wrong answers, free tries run out very fast, pushy premium prompts
Pour qui : Algebra and basic-math students who need a walkthrough of simple problems
Rang 20. Note des avis : 46 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 3 412 notes
46sur 100
Many value detailed explanations with examples and coverage beyond math into history and ELA, and it genuinely lifted some grades. But after a recent update it turned slow (up to 30 seconds per answer), answers are often wrong, and users say the 'math' button broke. It also crops photos and hides part of the explanation text, and hits limits despite an 'unlimited free' label.
Points forts : Detailed explanations with examples, history and ELA coverage, help understanding topics
Reproches : Slow answers after the update, frequent errors, broken math button, cropped photos and text, limits despite an 'unlimited' label
Pour qui : Students who want humanities explanations and simpler math, with patience for the speed
Rang 21. Note des avis : 45 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 58 081 notes
45sur 100
When it works it gives a correct answer and explains the steps, and someone passed chemistry with an A all year using it. But it only works half the time, the photo captures the problem incompletely and changes the crop, some answers are wrong, and the free tokens run out fast so you end up moving to Pro.
Points forts : Gives correct answers and explains the working, helps pass chemistry, fast when it is stable
Reproches : Works only half the time, photo captures the problem incompletely and re-crops it, some answers wrong, free tokens run out fast
Pour qui : Students checking and working through math and chemistry problems, if they will pay for Pro to get tokens
Rang 22. Note des avis : 45 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 3,4★ · 558 notes
45sur 100
It helps solve and check answers, and the step-by-step breakdown genuinely teaches the method, which is what younger students praise. But the handwriting input barely recognizes what you write, there is no decimal point or fractions, and you cannot enter a variable other than x, y, z. Photo recognition is advertised, but the camera is locked behind payment, and even after paying the accuracy still limps.
Points forts : Solves and lets you check your own answers, the step-by-step breakdown teaches the method, good for younger students doing addition and subtraction, easy to use
Reproches : Handwriting input barely recognizes what you write, no decimal point or fractions, you cannot enter a variable other than x, y, z, camera recognition is paid only, does not solve word problems
Pour qui : Schoolchildren doing basic math who are fine entering problems by hand and skipping the camera
Rang 23. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 5 552 notes
44sur 100
People value the step-by-step breakdown and the essay and summary generator, and for some it genuinely rescued their math. But accuracy is shaky (users report 6/10 or 85% correct), the app freezes and crashes with a 'Solvo could not generate an answer' error, and the free tier gives only two questions. Billing is a separate pain: charges after cancellation and inside the seven-day window.
Points forts : Step-by-step problem breakdown, essay and summary generator, help across school subjects
Reproches : Wrong answers, freezing and crashes, only 2 free questions, limits even on the paid plan, charges after cancellation
Pour qui : High schoolers who need step-by-step explanations and are willing to pay while double-checking answers
Rang 24. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 30 544 notes
42sur 100
It gives a clear step-by-step breakdown, handles even some higher math, and explains rather than just handing over the answer. It breaks down on the fact that much is locked behind a paid subscription and it demands money right away, the camera does not work for some users, and the one-scan-per-30-minutes limit stops you re-shooting a bad frame.
Points forts : Clear step-by-step breakdown, handles even some higher math, explains rather than just giving the answer
Reproches : Much locked behind a paid subscription and demands money immediately, camera fails for some users, one-scan-per-30-minutes limit
Pour qui : Students who want a step-by-step breakdown of math problems up through some higher math, if they will pay and tolerate the scan limit
Rang 25. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 11 977 notes
42sur 100
Real human experts solve the problems inside, and when they land it, the answer is correct with a step-by-step explanation and decent speed. The problem is inconsistency: roughly one in ten answers is wrong, the paid priority queue doesn't speed things up, and the cost bites, up to a hundred dollars in a single week. Many are put off that no answer is shown at all without paying.
Points forts : Live experts give a correct answer with a breakdown, decent response speed, step-by-step explanations, graphing
Reproches : Roughly one in ten answers is wrong, the paid priority queue doesn't speed things up, very expensive, no answer shown without paying
Pour qui : People willing to pay for a breakdown from a real person and tolerate occasional misses
Rang 26. Note des avis : 41 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 2 677 notes
41sur 100
For some it helps them absorb math and chemistry better and the clear explanations get praise. But in practice accuracy is around 70%, the app closes on its own, and after an update answers take 10+ minutes while the phone drops out. The free tier gives only 3-5 scans a day, and there are complaints about charges months after cancellation.
Points forts : Clear explanations, help with chemistry and math, a sense of progress for some users
Reproches : Around 70% accuracy, self-closing crashes, 10+ minute answers after the update, only 3-5 scans a day free, charges after cancellation
Pour qui : Chemistry and math students willing to pay and tolerate a daily scan limit
Rang 27. Note des avis : 40 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 733 059 notes
40sur 100
It used to catch the problem instantly from a photo and show the working, and that is what people loved. The main pain now is that from a photo it swaps in a similar but wrong problem with a different answer, and it cannot handle high school or college level math, often bouncing you to Google.
Points forts : Shows the working not just the answer, handles simple math well, handy for copying on a test
Reproches : Swaps in a wrong problem with a different answer from a photo, fails at complex math, redirects to Google instead of solving
Pour qui : Students needing simple problems with the working shown, not for hard high school or college math
Rang 28. Note des avis : 40 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 33 059 notes
40sur 100
It explains the working clearly and neatly and is fine for checking basic homework, with some STEM students using it to verify formulas and biology answers. But accuracy wobbles, it gives different wrong answers to the same question, it freezes even for paying users, and the lifetime purchase is tied to one device and vanishes when you switch phones.
Points forts : Explains the working clearly, good for checking basic homework, verifies formulas and biology answers
Reproches : Wobbly accuracy giving different wrong answers to the same question, freezes even for paying users, lifetime purchase tied to a device and lost on switch
Pour qui : Students checking basic homework and STEM formulas, as long as they do not count on the lifetime purchase across devices
Rang 29. Note des avis : 40 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 13 320 notes
40sur 100
Some users are happy with the college algebra help and the clear layout. But there are many complaints about wrong answers (a simple 7k-3k example solved incorrectly), no steps shown after paying, and the subscription asking for money again even after purchase. The camera often won't take the photo, and the built-in SAT questions are broken.
Points forts : College algebra help, clean and clear layout, helps when math just isn't clicking
Reproches : Wrong answers even on simple problems, payment doesn't unlock steps, subscription asks for money again, camera often won't take the photo, broken SAT questions
Pour qui : People who need an answer on basic algebra and can tolerate misses
Rang 30. Note des avis : 40 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,3★ · 642 notes
40sur 100
The core value is video solutions to textbook problems, and when they are there people genuinely learn the method. But the videos are often cut off at the edges with no zoom, so half the steps are invisible, and a link from Google opens the app without the problem you wanted. On top of that many people are stuck trying to cancel, there is no cancel button in the app or on the site, and free trials rack up large charges with no warning.
Points forts : Video solutions to textbook problems help you understand the method, step-by-step breakdown, raises grades, the AI gives explanations on request
Reproches : Videos and steps are cut off at the edges with no zoom, a Google link opens the app without the problem you wanted, canceling the subscription cannot be completed, AI answers are often wrong, the app freezes and glitches
Pour qui : Students who need video walkthroughs of problems from their specific textbook
Rang 31. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 4 886 notes
38sur 100
For some it helps them understand material and lift their grades, especially when studying late after sports. But mostly people arrive as a Gauth replacement and get let down: the scanner replies 'I can't directly view photos', botches even 10÷2, payment kicks in after three questions, and charges continue after cancellation. It also lacks Arabic in translation.
Points forts : Helps understand material and improve grades, handy late at night
Reproches : Scanner won't read photos, gross errors in simple math, payment after 3 questions, charges after cancellation, no Arabic
Pour qui : Students looking for a Gauth replacement who can tolerate errors and an early paywall
Rang 32. Note des avis : 35 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 65 516 notes
35sur 100
It helps you check your work against other people's solutions for course materials and format papers, and most of the time the answers are right. But the model of limited document unlocks on top of a paid subscription frustrates people most, plus the camera catches the problem only half the time, answers sometimes load for 20 minutes, and cancelling is nearly impossible.
Points forts : Helps check work against others' solutions for course materials, format papers, mostly correct answers
Reproches : Limited document unlocks despite a paid subscription, camera catches the problem only half the time, answers load for 20 minutes, nearly impossible to cancel
Pour qui : Students who need to check solutions against course materials and format papers, if they can live with the unlock limit
Rang 33. Note des avis : 34 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,3★ · 2 494 notes
34sur 100
The human-expert model delivers a quality answer when everything works, and it helps people across subjects. But answers can take hours (users report 2-3 hours), experts reply in illegible handwriting, the app crashes, rejects correct passwords, and glitches on iPad and web. A separate pain: monthly charges after cancellation with no reminder at all.
Points forts : Quality answers from human experts, coverage of any academic question, essay library
Reproches : 2-3 hour waits for an answer, unreadable handwriting, crashes and login failures, iPad and web glitches, charges after cancellation with no reminders
Pour qui : Students who want a real expert's walkthrough and can wait hours rather than needing it instantly
Rang 34. Note des avis : 34 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 1 289 notes
34sur 100
People value the live experts who walk through a problem step by step and pull students through statistics, which helped some pass their class. But paying users widely report that after payment the app stops granting access or says 'can't read the photo', charges keep coming, and cancelling the subscription or getting a refund is nearly impossible.
Points forts : Live experts explain step by step, helps pass statistics, logical problem breakdowns
Reproches : Loses access after payment, often can't read the problem photo, wrong answers, impossible to cancel subscription or refund
Pour qui : Students who want a real human walkthrough and can stomach the billing risk
Rang 35. Note des avis : 34 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 970 notes
34sur 100
People install it for the on-screen calculator widget that Apple does not offer, but the widget lags and trails keystrokes by a couple of seconds. Cut-off buttons, portrait-only layout on iPad, and rounding that turns 3.5x1.5 into 5.2 instead of 5.25 wear people down. Inside the app itself math is fast, and that is what keeps it around.
Points forts : Fast math inside the app itself, an on-screen calculator widget Apple does not offer, simple and easy interface, free
Reproches : The widget trails keystrokes by a couple of seconds, buttons and operators run off the screen edge, iPad works only in portrait, answers get rounded incorrectly, the widget sometimes shows up blank
Pour qui : People who just want a simple calculator widget on iPhone and can live with input lag
Rang 36. Note des avis : 33 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 5 666 notes
33sur 100
When it works, it helps you understand a topic and gives an answer, and long-time users say they got through school and college on it. But right now it's unreliable: constant timeouts and unknown error, streaks of wrong answers in a row, and weak step explanations. People remember it used to be free with ads, and now there's a payment wall after a couple of questions and a three-a-day limit.
Points forts : Helps you understand a topic, carries you across many subjects, simple for beginners and older users
Reproches : Frequent timeouts and unknown error, streaks of wrong answers in a row, weak step explanations, payment wall after a couple of questions and a three-a-day limit
Pour qui : People who need a one-off hint on a topic and can live with instability and limits
Rang 37. Note des avis : 33 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 1 191 notes
33sur 100
When it works, people like the simplicity: snap the problem, get a detailed answer, with coverage from physics to English. But a huge share report the app throwing an error on every scan for weeks or stopping right after they paid, plus ads remaining even after purchase.
Points forts : Simple photo capture, detailed answers, coverage from math to physics and English
Reproches : Constant scan errors for weeks, stops working after payment, ads even after buying, no refunds or support
Pour qui : People who want a quick photo breakdown across subjects and get lucky with a working build
Rang 38. Note des avis : 32 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 2 162 notes
32sur 100
People grab it to check their answers, but it gets things wrong more often than it helps: students report failing quizzes and tests after trusting it. A separate pain is that the subscription is nearly impossible to cancel and charges keep coming while support goes silent.
Points forts : Sometimes helps college students pass classes, saved a semester for a few
Reproches : Frequently wrong answers, fails quizzes and tests, slow and freezes, can't cancel subscription, unexpected charges
Pour qui : University students willing to double-check every answer and fight through cancellation hassle
Rang 39. Note des avis : 30 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 83 116 notes
30sur 100
It is basically a regular calculator with photo formula recognition and currency conversion, but the key AI features are locked behind a 10 dollar a week subscription, which is absurdly expensive for a calculator. People are annoyed by the constant do you like the app prompt, pushy ads and the camera not solving anything for some users.
Points forts : Recognizes formulas from a photo, converts currencies and does square roots, clean design
Reproches : 10 dollar a week subscription on a calculator, nagging do you like the app prompt, lots of ads, camera fails to solve problems
Pour qui : People who want a simple calculator with photo recognition, if they can put up with the pricey subscription and ads
Rang 40. Note des avis : 30 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 5 633 notes
30sur 100
A few users praise the clear explanations and say they got through their studies on it. But the core of the complaints is billing and login: even after paying, it kicks you out and demands a subscription again after two or three questions, forcing a delete-and-reinstall. On top of that, it charges after cancellation, access is lost when you switch phones, and it's useless beyond basic algebra.
Points forts : Clear explanations, helps carry you through your studies, breaks a problem down step by step when it works
Reproches : Kicks you out and demands a subscription again after paying, charges after cancellation, access lost when switching phones, useless beyond basic algebra
Pour qui : People who need help with basic algebra and are willing to risk the billing and login trouble
Rang 41. Note des avis : 30 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 1 487 notes
30sur 100
It's billed as a photo solver, but people widely complain that answers are wrong even after buying premium. On top of that, ads rain down on nearly every action along with pop-ups, and you only get a couple of free tries before it demands payment.
Points forts : Sometimes accurate answers, helps with simple math and spelling
Reproches : Often wrong answers even after paying, flood of ads and pop-ups, only 2-3 free tries, photo input broke after an update
Pour qui : At most for simple school math, and even then with double-checking
Rang 42. Note des avis : 30 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 465 notes
30sur 100
People use it to humanize AI text for essays and for the photo solver, and when it works they turn in last-minute work and pass detectors. But the app regularly fails to show answers after a scan, throws a fetch error, and simply does not respond, and it flags its own humanized text as "95% AI". Billing is a separate irritant, charging 9.99 or 24.99 with no intent to renew, cancellation that fails for months, and a subscription that does not activate after payment.
Points forts : Humanizes AI text to slip past detectors, bails you out with last-minute essays, the photo solver gives fast answers, there is a study simulator
Reproches : Often fails to show answers and throws a fetch error, flags its own humanized text as 95% AI, gives wrong answers, charges money with no intent to renew, canceling the subscription fails for months
Pour qui : Students who need to rush an essay in and run text past detectors, if they can stomach the failures and the billing
Rang 43. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 512 notes
28sur 100
It is meant as a photo math solver, but answers come back in other languages, Spanish, French, Russian, that people cannot read, which breaks the whole point. Accuracy limps, and it often refuses chemistry and biology that it advertises, even though it used to help. Billing finishes people off, charging 4.99 every week with no visible plan in the account, and after a yearly payment the app stops working entirely.
Points forts : Helps double-check your own work with no lag, gives correct answers when it works, bails you out with math
Reproches : Answers come back in other languages, Spanish French Russian, that you cannot read, accuracy limps, refuses to solve chemistry and biology though they are advertised, only three problems a day for free, charges 4.99 every week
Pour qui : People who need to quickly double-check math and are willing to gamble on the answer language and the billing
Rang 44. Note des avis : 25 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 524 notes
25sur 100
It is meant as an AI helper for chat and homework, but detailed reviews say the video and generator are weak and the presentations come out dull with random pictures. Feeding a slide deck from a PC leaves the app stuck in a loop demanding an upgrade. A separate mess is canceling the subscription, it charges 14.99 with no clear warning, and support runs you in circles and will not let you cancel.
Points forts : Fast and responsive support per the real reviews, an early entry into AI toolboxes, some long-term subscribers of several years
Reproches : The video and image generator are weak, presentations are dull with random photos, the PC login gets stuck in an upgrade loop, it charges 14.99 with no clear warning, canceling the subscription is nearly impossible
Pour qui : People who want one AI toolbox for chat and rough presentations and are willing to fight the billing
Rang 45. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 204 737 notes
22sur 100
It used to be a place where real experts helped you work through problems and that saved people in college. Now AI answers instead of experts and it is often wrong, while the 20 dollar a month plan either fails to load an answer or just shows similar questions from its database instead of yours. Add complaints about being signed out on a second device and charges after cancelling.
Points forts : Sometimes explains the working better than a professor, used to have real experts answering
Reproches : Experts replaced by an error-prone AI, answers often fail to load, shows similar questions instead of yours, signs you out on a second device, charges after cancellation
Pour qui : Almost no one as it stands now, at most for ready answers from the database if you are lucky enough to find your question
Rang 46. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 4 397 notes
22sur 100
A few happy users say it got them through courses like paramedic school and that the owl chat is handy. But the overwhelming majority report consistently wrong answers, broken features, an app and web version that don't share the same account, and crashes that wipe progress. There are also many complaints about non-refundable charges and a hidden cancel button.
Points forts : Owl assistant chat, fast answers for some users
Reproches : Frequently wrong answers, broken features, app and web don't sync, crashes wiping progress, non-refundable charges and hidden cancel
Pour qui : Realistically no one reliably, at most trying the chat helper while ready to cancel immediately
Rang 47. Note des avis : 18 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,2★ · 51 292 notes
18sur 100
Hardly anyone gets value out of it for free because after you scan, the solution is shown blurred and you must pay per answer. Many complain the answers are wrong even when paid, there are no correct steps, it does not solve word problems, and sometimes it just stops working.
Points forts : Sometimes helps with basic math problems, handy for a couple of siblings to share
Reproches : Solution shown blurred and locked behind pay-per-answer, wrong answers even when paid, no correct steps, cannot solve word problems, stops working
Pour qui : Almost no one, at most for the simplest problems if you are willing to pay per answer
Rang 48. Note des avis : 18 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,0★ · 7 034 notes
18sur 100
The rare happy users say it helps with math anxiety and gives accurate answers, and one praises it for handling imaginary numbers. But the overwhelming majority hit a hard payment wall: not a single free answer, double and repeated monthly charges, no way to cancel or delete, and only an answer with no steps. Problem recognition is sluggish and often won't load.
Points forts : Helps with math anxiety, accurate answers when it works, handles imaginary numbers
Reproches : No free answers at all, double and repeated charges, can't cancel the subscription or delete, shows the answer with no steps, the problem often won't load
Pour qui : Almost no one, except someone who just wants a bare algebra answer and doesn't mind a harsh subscription
À propos des chiffres
Deux chiffres — deux sources
Elles aident à comparer les apps, mais ne remplacent pas la vérification de ta propre tâche.
Score des avis · jusqu’à 100
Le score conservé de l’étude inApp sur les textes des avis. Il évalue l’ensemble de l’app dans l’archive, pas la fiabilité d’une fonction précise.
Note de la boutique · jusqu’à 5
La note de la page de l’app au moment de la collecte. La note et la version actuelles peuvent différer.
Dans l’échantillon archivé de ce sujet : 48 apps et 11 682 avis lus. C’est le volume total de l’étude, pas le nombre d’avis par app.
Un écart entre les chiffres ne prouve pas de manipulation. La date de calcul et la méthode complète du score ne sont pas dans l’archive mobile. Compare les descriptions des tâches et les citations sources, et vérifie les conditions dans la version actuelle.
