Wert aus Rezensionen: 65 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 2.076 Bewertungen
65von 100
A generator with a strong community and custom model builder. The main drawback is heavy-handed censorship that blocks even swimsuits and women's legs, plus a free tier cut from 10 to 5 generations per day.
Gelobt
Active community, custom model builder, great for book character creation, family-safe content
Kritik
Censorship applied unevenly by gender (male swimwear passes, female swimwear banned), daily limit halved without warning, realistic mode looks flat, limb deformations increased after recent updates
Für wen: Authors and illustrators who need a safe generator for characters without NSFW content, with community access and custom models
Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 3.091 Bewertungen
62von 100
An anime generator with relaxed limits on adult content. Works well with properly written tags, but after updates some users lose their accounts and purchased credits.
Gelobt
Prompt freedom, tag responsiveness, daily free credits, built-in art publishing system
Kritik
Consumable grant lock bug causes some users to lose access and credits after payment, slow support, style filters sometimes break without refunding credits
Für wen: Anime art fans and character creators for stories who are willing to learn the tag system
Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 1.788 Bewertungen
62von 100
A solid anime generator with a rich LoRA library and a generous free credit system. The main problem is erratic moderation: SFW images get blocked while other users' inappropriate content stays up.
Gelobt
Huge library of ready-made characters and LoRA, daily free credits, fast generation, web version works better than mobile
Kritik
Inconsistent content filtering, no way to delete images from your library, fewer models on mobile than on the site, other users' policy-violating images are not removed
Für wen: Anime art fans who want a flexible system with LoRA without a big financial commitment
Platz 4. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 13.714 Bewertungen
58von 100
One of the more honest AI art generators with a beginner-friendly interface, but paid avatars get stuck in generation for days and saved galleries periodically disappear.
Gelobt: Most free features work well. Good for fantasy illustration without precise requirements. Beginners find it easy to pick up.
Kritik: Paid avatars enter generation and do not appear for days. Saved work vanishes repeatedly, and support does not respond. Poor accuracy on text and facial details.
Für wen: Beginners exploring AI art who want a free visual playground without precise prompting
Platz 5. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 2.490 Bewertungen
58von 100
Ideogram is known for best-in-class text and logo rendering in images. But the mobile app is a thin browser wrapper plagued by Cloudflare pop-ups that block paying subscribers.
Gelobt: Sharp text and logo rendering, rich image detail, users return daily
Kritik: Cloudflare pop-ups lock paid accounts for a week, the app is just a webview with no native features, delete and privacy controls don't work even on paid tiers, color prompts are ignored
Für wen: Logo designers and typographers willing to work through a browser rather than a native app
Platz 6. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 24.281 Bewertungen
55von 100
One of the best AI video platforms for visual quality, but expensive and unpredictable: prompts are often misinterpreted, filters block neutral content, and credits burn for nothing.
Gelobt: High visual quality in videos, ability to animate your own images, good consistency by market standards
Kritik: Very expensive monetization, unstable prompt following, aggressive content filters, generation queues, text in video is unreadable
Für wen: Content creators and visual experimenters willing to spend a significant budget on AI video
Platz 7. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 7.448 Bewertungen
52von 100
An AI avatar generator with a wide range of styles and cosplay that regular users genuinely enjoy, but it consistently fails on monetization: deceptive trials, unfair charges, and credits that never arrive create a toxic purchase experience.
Gelobt: Wide style library including cosplay and anime. Gives 20 free credits daily so you can try without paying. Support sometimes responds quickly. Results are impressive when the app is stable.
Kritik: Credits don't arrive as promised. App crashes immediately. Avatars don't reproduce hair or eye color even when explicitly specified. Reports of $499 lifetime followed by a demand for another $99/month. The feedback button doesn't work.
Für wen: Users who want to see themselves in different art styles and are sticking to the free daily credits only, not paying for a subscription
Platz 8. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 3.288 Bewertungen
52von 100
A set of style filters with an aggressive credit model. The artistic effects work, but constant ads and credits that vanish into thin air reduce the enjoyment to almost nothing.
Gelobt: Wide selection of art styles, fast generation, ability to use for free by watching ads
Kritik: Credits disappear without a trace, rendering slows down on paid subscriptions, weak prompt adherence, support is unreachable
Für wen: Casual users who want to turn a photo into a 'Monet painting' once and don't mind burning credits
Platz 9. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 2.066 Bewertungen
52von 100
An image generation app with solid capabilities that degraded after a monetization overhaul and tighter censorship. Strengths include a diverse feature set (outpainting, object removal), weaknesses are unpredictable filtering and broken promises.
Gelobt: High-quality results in fantasy and anime styles, outpainting and object removal, cross-platform account across Mac and iPhone, no forced review before use
Kritik: Stopped working without explanation, censorship blocks harmless requests, users pushed to a subscription after purchasing lifetime access, generated text has errors, prompts frequently ignored
Für wen: Artists and fantasy art fans willing to tolerate unpredictable filtering
Platz 10. Wert aus Rezensionen: 50 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 143.429 Bewertungen
50von 100
An entertainment app for animating photos to trending dances and effects. The credit system is structured so the free trial lets you do almost nothing.
Gelobt: Quickly creates fun photo animations. Viral format, works well for social media. Easy entry point into AI animation.
Kritik: Free trial gives 1,000 credits while any action costs 3,000. Several users report $80/month charges with no way to reach support. Faces in animations don't always match the original.
Für wen: One-off social media fun with photos. Not for regular use due to expensive credits.
Platz 11. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 141.346 Bewertungen
48von 100
Photo-to-cartoon and trending video effects. The output quality is fine for entertainment, but a $12.99/week subscription ($675/year) is wildly out of proportion to the product's value.
Gelobt: Fun cartoon versions of photos. Trending dance videos with the user's face get laughs from everyone. Very simple to use.
Kritik: Subscription charges immediately after the trial without a warning, including for users who never opened the app. $12.99 per week with an annual cost of $675 is a clear value mismatch. Results are 'fun but not realistic'.
Für wen: Anyone who wants a one-time laugh with cartoon photos. Cancel the subscription immediately after first use.
Platz 12. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 11.122 Bewertungen
48von 100
An AI photo editor with reliable background and shadow removal, but after a few edits it stops following instructions and alters your face with any enhancement attempt.
Gelobt: Background removal works consistently. Shadow removal is effective. Simple interface works well for beginners.
Kritik: After 2-3 edits it ignores new instructions and wastes credits. Alters facial features during restoration. A $70 annual subscription doesn't top up credits on schedule. No support.
Für wen: Users who need simple one-off edits: remove a background, a shadow, or a random object
Platz 13. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 9.982 Bewertungen
48von 100
A powerful web image generation tool that degraded in UI, censorship, and stability after its acquisition by Canva. Video generation (Veo 3) frequently errors out and tokens disappear for nothing.
Gelobt: Real model power when it works, impressive results. Canvas with adjustable influence strength (30-95) is convenient for iterative editing. The platform's historical reputation.
Kritik: Constant Veo 3 errors with no token refunds. Censorship blocks even neutral prompts. iPad text-input bug. Auth breaks when logging in through the mobile app. Tokens vanish without explanation.
Für wen: Power users who already know the platform and are willing to tolerate instability for quality results on the web version
Platz 14. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 4.433 Bewertungen
48von 100
The best face swap in the category for core function quality, but reliability suffers: hangs in the queue, crashes on multi-face swaps, video is capped at 1 minute, and ads have an uncloseable X button.
Gelobt: Basic photo swap works accurately and realistically, daily free tokens, wide selection of video templates
Kritik: Multi-face swap crashes, video capped at 1 minute for paying users, queue hangs for hours, ads won't close, output video loses quality compared to the source
Für wen: Quick entertainment photo swaps for social media. Not suitable for video work or group scenes.
Platz 15. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 3.726 Bewertungen
48von 100
A hybrid of AI character chat and image generation that has lost its direction. Long-time users complain about quality degradation and hypercensorship, newer users praise the character interactivity.
Gelobt: Large character library, daily free crystals (200), animating your own drawings works well for some users
Kritik: Censorship blocks harmless content (hugs, swimwear), short AI memory (context resets after about 10 messages), image quality degraded after December 2025 updates
Für wen: Users who want AI character chat rather than a pure image generator
Platz 16. Wert aus Rezensionen: 46 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 184.723 Bewertungen
46von 100
Photo filters with AI effects that have been around for years. Strong point is the style library. Main issues: opaque pricing, app crashes while working, and faces become unrecognizable after AI processing.
Gelobt: Large selection of filters and effects. Fast styled photo creation. Long track record.
Kritik: Three 'Premium' tiers at different prices with no clear distinction in features. App crashes when selecting photos for some users. Faces become unrecognizable after AI processing. Users report photos appearing in Google without consent.
Für wen: Quick style experiments when face accuracy doesn't matter. Not for professional work.
Platz 17. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 28.429 Bewertungen
44von 100
An editor with photo restoration and AI video: great at improving old photos, but requires you to pay separately for both a subscription and credits, and video frequently distorts faces.
Gelobt: Old photo restoration is impressive, varied feature set, videos come out well when the system isn't glitching
Kritik: Dual monetization (subscription plus credits), faces in videos often don't match the original, credits burn on errors, confusing interface
Für wen: Anyone who wants to restore old family photos or create a one-off AI video but doesn't plan to use it daily
Platz 18. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 7.314 Bewertungen
44von 100
A professional Adobe AI tool with strong capabilities (Omni 3, timelines, sound effects), but a confusing credit system, regular feature outages, and weak prompt adherence make it unreliable even for paying users.
Gelobt: Multi-scenario setup via Omni 3. Sound effects. 2K editing without spending credits. Integration with the Adobe ecosystem for those already working in it.
Kritik: Credits burn in 30 minutes of testing. Image-to-video is unavailable under high load even though you pay monthly. Timeouts charge credits with no result. Images don't follow prompts. Pro Plus is constantly unavailable. The app feels unfinished.
Für wen: Adobe professionals who already have a Creative Cloud subscription and need a quick AI draft, not precise prompt following
Platz 19. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 3.010 Bewertungen
44von 100
A photo animation app that impresses when it works, but stability is catastrophic: videos can't be downloaded, and the lifetime subscription doesn't deliver the promised unlimited templates.
Gelobt: When it works, the output looks beautiful. Animations of nature scenes are convincing.
Kritik: Videos generate but can't be downloaded (an X appears instead of a button), templates don't open, support is in Chinese, lifetime promises unlimited but delivers a weekly credit allotment
Für wen: Patient users who have time to deal with errors and don't expect refunds
Platz 20. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.645 Bewertungen
44von 100
A Freepik platform with a rich set of models and tools, but a widespread subscription activation bug via the App Store. Real value exists in the web version, the mobile app works significantly worse.
Gelobt: Large selection of AI models, video and images in one place, adjustable moderation, solid web version functionality
Kritik: App Store payments often fail to activate the plan, support doesn't respond, date filtering is broken, uploading images from files doesn't work, credits don't carry over between billing periods
Für wen: Content creators and designers willing to work through the web version without relying on the mobile app
Platz 21. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 50.791 Bewertungen
42von 100
A specialized tattoo sketch generator with real professional use by tattoo artists, but weak execution: styles are indistinguishable, complex imagery gets ignored, and ads are aggressive.
Gelobt: Body preview feature is useful for client consultations, fast mockups for clients, simple designs come out reasonably well
Kritik: Complex and specific requests produce the same generic output regardless of style, style selection barely affects the result, ads after every action, adds random faces to animal photos
Für wen: Tattoo artists for quick client consultations and anyone who wants a rough sketch of a simple design
Platz 23. Wert aus Rezensionen: 41 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 729.360 Bewertungen
41von 100
A coloring book with AI filters, not an image generator. Ads every 5-30 seconds make the core mechanic unplayable. Paid access is required for almost any basic tool.
Gelobt: Large selection of images to color. Relaxing format when there are no ads.
Kritik: Ads literally after every action, including lifting a pencil. Most tools and colors require watching an ad or making a payment. Automatic subscription on first launch without clear consent.
Für wen: Kids whose parents are willing to pay to remove the ads. Adults with any quality expectations should look elsewhere.
Platz 24. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 137.512 Bewertungen
38von 100
A photo editor with AI features that systematically moves previously free capabilities behind a paywall with every update. Image generation is unstable and follows prompts poorly.
Gelobt: Wide set of photo editing tools. Good for adding text layers and overlays. Specific prompts occasionally produce decent results.
Kritik: After every update something previously free becomes paid. App crashes when loading photos on some devices. AI generation is unstable: often just pastes a face into someone else's photo. Text in generated images doesn't work. Popular features removed without notice.
Für wen: Mobile photo editing with text layers if you're willing to pay a subscription. Not recommended as an AI generator.
Platz 25. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 86.139 Bewertungen
38von 100
An AI photo enhancer with an unstable backend and aggressive monetization. When it works, colorization and old photo restoration are pleasant. When it doesn't, it can be down for weeks.
Gelobt: Old photo colorization, hairstyle changes, resolution enhancement
Kritik: Backend goes down for hours and days, subscription cancellation requires third-party workarounds with no feedback, results sometimes look worse than the original
Für wen: Family archive enthusiasts who can tolerate an unreliable service
Platz 26. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 32.770 Bewertungen
38von 100
A feature-rich editor that degraded after updates: text-to-image stopped following prompts, familiar tools disappeared, and the monetization is dual-layered.
Gelobt: Layer compositing tool, rich font selection, AI tools are good when they work
Kritik: Text-to-image produces random results instead of what's requested, updates keep breaking existing features, dual charges (subscription plus credits), frequent crashes
Für wen: Social media users who need a multi-function editor and are willing to navigate a complex interface
Platz 27. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 4.074 Bewertungen
38von 100
An image generator with acceptable visual quality but an extremely limited free tier and misleading 'unlimited' advertising. Only worthwhile for users who need one or two images and nothing more.
Gelobt: A few users note good visual results and a comfortable onboarding experience
Kritik: Hard paywall after 3-10 free images, real daily limit even on paid tiers (5-10/day instead of advertised unlimited), saved albums disappear
Für wen: The occasional user who needs one or two nice images every few days
Platz 28. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,0★ · 2.571 Bewertungen
38von 100
A multi-function generator with photo restoration, artistic filters, and text-to-image. The watercolor mode gets praise, but portrait restoration blurs details, and text-to-image ignores prompts.
Gelobt: Watercolor and artistic photo styles, easy filter application
Kritik: Photo restoration produces blurry, noisy output and makes people look older, prompts ignored (dragon wings remain even after asking to remove them), no high-resolution export
Für wen: Users who want to quickly add an artistic style to a photo, not precise text-based generation
Platz 29. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,1★ · 1.651 Bewertungen
38von 100
Once a decent generator with Ghibli and anime styles, destroyed by an update that broke the old Pro plan and added a forced expensive subscription. Isolated reports of unstoppable charges.
Gelobt: Good Ghibli style, some users got high-quality results, responsive support when credits were lost
Kritik: Update broke the old Pro plan without compensation, filtering blocks acceptable content, internal generation errors, unable to cancel subscription
Für wen: Ghibli art fans who are okay with instability and an expensive subscription
Platz 30. Wert aus Rezensionen: 36 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 58.259 Bewertungen
36von 100
An AI product photo generator for small business with a good concept but poor execution. Logos have typos, products get distorted, and scaling doesn't work.
Gelobt: Fast background generation for clothing, variety of scenes for product shots
Kritik: Logos generate with errors, product scale is wrong, subscription cancellation is deliberately hidden, the app radically changed its feature set after purchase
Für wen: Small businesses that need a quick simple background shot of a product without a logo
Platz 31. Wert aus Rezensionen: 36 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 22.225 Bewertungen
36von 100
An AI art generator that worked well as a community tool, but a series of updates cut free credits, broke purchase transfers, and added overly aggressive filtering.
Gelobt: Rich selection of art styles, ability to create custom styles, simple interface
Kritik: Free credits cut from 5 to 1 per day, purchased credits vanish upon registration, censorship blocks neutral female imagery, results often stray far from the prompt
Für wen: Artists and AI art enthusiasts who want to experiment with styles and are willing to pay for credits
Platz 32. Wert aus Rezensionen: 36 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 1.512 Bewertungen
36von 100
An AI generator stuck in an infinite loading loop for many users. When it works, results are imprecise but occasionally decent. A paid subscription often doesn't remove the limitations.
Gelobt: Fast generation when it works, first results occasionally impress, free credits are available
Kritik: Generator hangs and shows jokes instead of images, prompts execute inaccurately, slow loading, can't delete images from the collection, paid subscription doesn't always unlock features
Für wen: Casual users who need one quick generation and get lucky with the server
Platz 33. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 79.722 Bewertungen
35von 100
An AI avatar generator that gets worse with every update. Once produced decent portraits, now generation hangs at 99%, and the output face almost never resembles the original.
Gelobt: Variety of styles and animations when things go well, wide range of scenes
Kritik: Generation hangs and never finishes, face doesn't match the uploaded photo, paid credits don't arrive, models removed without compensation
Für wen: Anyone who wants a one-time experiment without planning to use it long-term
Platz 34. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 11.532 Bewertungen
35von 100
A professional video generation tool with genuinely high-quality output, but catastrophically expensive for regular users: a $15 subscription runs out after two short clips.
Gelobt: When the prompt works, animation quality is above average. Understands basic instructions quickly.
Kritik: $15 = 2 clips of 5 seconds each. Prompts ignored: background motion not added, descriptions violated. Credits charged even for failed generations. Text in video is unreadable. Gen 3 removed without notice.
Für wen: Professionals with a budget who need quality over quantity. Not for high-volume content creation.
Platz 35. Wert aus Rezensionen: 33 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 74.915 Bewertungen
33von 100
An AI image and video generator with an unstable backend and billing problems. Faces come out unnatural, text in images has errors, and the subscription attempts to charge again after cancellation.
Gelobt: Simple interface, occasionally captures the right mood in art
Kritik: Stops generating after updates, faces look unnatural, text in images has spelling errors, multiple confusing pricing plans, attempted re-charges after cancellation
Für wen: Casual curious users not planning to use it regularly
Platz 36. Wert aus Rezensionen: 32 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 143.831 Bewertungen
32von 100
A pioneer of mobile AI generation that has degraded to near-scam territory. Five free generations per day, $99/year for a subscription, and broken login for existing users describe most reviews.
Gelobt: Historically the first simple generator with abstract styles. A minimal prompt gives unpredictable, interesting results. The input image strength editing tool was useful.
Kritik: Only 5 generations per day on the free plan. Deleted all users' old generations. Does not honor purchased lifetime subscriptions. Images often ignore specific prompt details: wrong hair color, beard instead of clean-shaven. Video generation is blocked by content restrictions even on neutral requests.
Für wen: Was for AI art beginners. Not recommended now due to product degradation and broken commitments to existing users.
Platz 37. Wert aus Rezensionen: 31 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 65.349 Bewertungen
31von 100
One of the first AI art generators, which betrayed early buyers by switching to a credit model after selling lifetime subscriptions. Landscapes are passable, people and complex scenes don't work.
Gelobt: Landscapes and settings, recognition of art styles for users who know art history
Kritik: People come out poorly, prompts are largely ignored when working with a source photo, lifetime subscriptions cancelled without refunds, accounts deleted without notice
Für wen: Anyone looking for landscape stylization who hasn't paid for a lifetime plan and just wants to try it
Platz 38. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 7.451 Bewertungen
30von 100
Gelobt: Visually attractive pre-made wallpapers and animated backgrounds.
Kritik: No real prompt-based generation. The app asked users to leave 5 stars for unlocking content and then didn't deliver on the promise. Almost all content is paid. $7 per week for a wallpaper gallery. Inappropriate for the 12+ audience it targets.
Für wen: Only for users who want attractive pre-made wallpapers and are willing to pay a subscription without expecting any AI generation.
Platz 39. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 5.044 Bewertungen
30von 100
An AI portrait generator that almost never recognizes the source face: adds hair to bald users, changes weight against settings, takes 30 minutes to generate, and charges credits even for bad results.
Gelobt: Occasionally produces decent professional-looking shots, many style and background options
Kritik: Output face often doesn't resemble the original, requires a $5.99 pack on top of an annual subscription, credits charged for failed generations, support unreachable, wait time up to 30 minutes
Für wen: Not suitable for free exploration, too unreliable for paying users
Platz 40. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 3.045 Bewertungen
30von 100
An AI avatar generator that promises realistic likeness but typically produces people of a different appearance or race, with artifacts and masculine features on female photos.
Gelobt: Certain anime styles occasionally capture real facial features, there are interesting themed packs
Kritik: Avatars don't resemble the uploaded photo, fewer images delivered than promised, free trial charges money without warning, support doesn't respond
Für wen: Not worth buying until face recognition accuracy improves dramatically
Platz 41. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 1.615 Bewertungen
30von 100
An abandoned app that stopped working normally after recent updates: constant crashes, lost lifetime subscriptions, disappeared features. Was good two years ago.
Gelobt: Previously supported reference images and delivered high quality. The AI art generator concept was implemented clearly.
Kritik: Constant crashes after updates, lifetime subscriptions stopped working, features disappeared or changed, no developer updates, no racial diversity in generation output
Für wen: No one, the app is effectively abandoned.
Platz 42. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 76.867 Bewertungen
28von 100
An AI avatar app with bait-and-switch monetization. One in five results looks acceptable, while body and ethnicity change arbitrarily.
Gelobt: Variety of themed templates, professional headshots occasionally come out well
Kritik: Coins charged with no result, body in the photo doesn't match the original, ethnicity and hair color change without being asked, the promised unlimited access turns into a trap
Für wen: Hard to recommend to anyone given the current quality and payment scheme
Platz 43. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 31.808 Bewertungen
28von 100
AI photo sessions with a solid visual foundation, but a blatantly predatory model: the subscription doesn't include photo sessions, each one is paid separately, and errors charge credits with no result.
Gelobt: Some photos look realistic, the idea of professional portraits without a photographer is appealing
Kritik: Double billing (subscription plus credits per photo), frequent crashes on upload, body in the photo doesn't match the real user, ads show non-existent features
Für wen: Not recommended to anyone in its current form due to opaque billing
Platz 44. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,2★ · 6.689 Bewertungen
28von 100
A 'who do I look like' entertainment tool that charges $17.99 per week for unstable matches, misidentifies gender, and produces different results from the same photo every time. Not worth it for entertainment or accuracy.
Gelobt: The concept is fun, and when it hilariously gets it wrong that's entertaining in itself.
Kritik: Requires payment before showing any result. $17.99/week and features still don't work after paying. Misidentifies gender even with long hair and pink clothing. Results aren't reproducible, the same photo gives different matches. Advertised as free.
Für wen: Not recommended for anyone: the price sets expectations far too high for the quality delivered.
Platz 45. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 5.820 Bewertungen
28von 100
An editor with an interesting style set that became a trap: terms change after payment, credits are cut every few months, and support goes silent.
Gelobt: Wide style and theme selection, occasionally produces vivid portraits, combines video and photo in one app
Kritik: Credits cut from 7 to 5 to 3 per week after purchasing an annual plan, best themes removed without explanation, results often don't resemble the source photo, support doesn't respond
Für wen: Not recommended to anyone, terms change retroactively and generation quality is below free alternatives
Platz 46. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 3.492 Bewertungen
28von 100
An NFT creator with a good idea but unstable execution. The NFT creation interface is simple, but MetaMask minting breaks, the gallery crashes, and there's no support.
Gelobt: Simple NFT art creation, low barrier to entry for crypto newcomers, handy tool for basic visual ideas
Kritik: Gallery crashes when scrolling, MetaMask minting doesn't work, too many ads every 30 seconds, no instructions or support
Für wen: NFT newcomers who want to try creating simple art without serious intent to sell it
Platz 47. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 3.287 Bewertungen
28von 100
A logo and photo background generator with attractive marketing copy, but results don't match the prompt, coins vanish without a refund, and editing burns the balance for a nonexistent result.
Gelobt: The background swap concept for product photos is convenient for e-commerce, one logo example impressed a professional
Kritik: Text in generations is consistently distorted, objects not accurately reproduced, a 250-coin animation returns an error, support doesn't return coins, double billing documented
Für wen: Not recommended to anyone until basic bugs with coins and generation accuracy are fixed
Platz 48. Wert aus Rezensionen: 27 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,2★ · 4.597 Bewertungen
27von 100
A generator with interesting styles but broken infrastructure: the server is constantly overloaded, only 2 free attempts, AI Avatar requires separate payment on top of a subscription, and a $79.99 lifetime purchase regularly resets.
Gelobt: Good at landscapes and abstract scenes, variety of styles
Kritik: Server error on queue with no credit refund, only 2 free images, AI Avatar is a hidden extra charge, $79.99 lifetime resets, support doesn't answer emails
Für wen: Artists and designers who need landscapes and fantasy scenes, only if they can find a stable server window
Platz 49. Wert aus Rezensionen: 25 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 3.681 Bewertungen
25von 100
A photo/avatar generator that without warning migrated to a new platform, voiding existing subscriptions. Image quality is described as adequate, but dual-paywall monetization and shutting down the old app are serious trust violations.
Gelobt: Realistic photos with good source material, some users praise character accuracy with the right set of photos
Kritik: Migration to Clone AI without transferring subscriptions, $80 annual subscription voided, hands generate with distorted fingers, hair color and race change arbitrarily
Für wen: This app should no longer be trusted given its history of forced migration
Platz 50. Wert aus Rezensionen: 24 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 5.731 Bewertungen
24von 100
A third-party wrapper around someone else's model using the DALL-E 3 brand name: credits disappear if the screen locks during generation, $20-100/year required upfront, and results are weaker than other free tools.
Gelobt: Occasionally handles simple requests, interface is more familiar than web-based tools
Kritik: Credits vanish if the phone locks during generation, heavy censorship on neutral requests, very little for free, results described as unrealistic by users who tried other apps
Für wen: Not recommended, the real DALL-E is available more cheaply through ChatGPT
Platz 51. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 16.764 Bewertungen
22von 100
An anime generator with a non-functional core feature: it doesn't create anime, crashes on basic actions, shows adult content ads on launch, and a lifetime purchase doesn't protect against failures.
Gelobt: Image quality is good when the app doesn't crash, some styles do work
Kritik: Crashes when opening basic tabs after an expensive purchase, doesn't generate anime style despite the name, aggressive adult content ads on launch, filters block neutral requests
Für wen: Not recommended to anyone in its current state
Platz 52. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 13.715 Bewertungen
22von 100
An image generator with virtually no prompt control, an ad after every action, and random explicit content appearing without being requested.
Gelobt: Some users like the visual output, especially the realistic style
Kritik: Prompts ignored: wrong gender, extra characters, unrequested details added. Ad before every generation and when opening every variation. App crashes. Daily limit without warning.
Für wen: Not suitable for serious work. Attracts users through NSFW content.
Platz 53. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 4.984 Bewertungen
22von 100
Classic bait-and-switch: the app promises to animate photos of deceased relatives and create AI videos, charges $49.99 per year, then demands more money for every single action, and results look nothing like the ads.
Gelobt: The idea of bringing old photos of loved ones to life is emotionally compelling, some face animation effects work
Kritik: After $49.99/year an extra fee is required for every video, results look radically different from the ads, strangers appear in photos, hair is added to bald people, support doesn't respond
Für wen: Not recommended to anyone in its current form
Platz 54. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,2★ · 3.939 Bewertungen
22von 100
Photo animation promises more than it delivers. It generates clip-art instead of real faces, requires a subscription plus extra coins simultaneously, and the advertised features (specific movements, multiple people in frame) simply don't work.
Gelobt: A small number of users report a pleasant transformation effect on a lucky generation
Kritik: Generated people don't resemble the original, dual monetization (subscription plus coins), advertised movements are absent, refunds not possible
Platz 55. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 2.880 Bewertungen
22von 100
A video and avatar generator with an aggressive monetization trap: the subscription is advertised as unlimited but delivers only 2-3 generations before credits run out. Face transfer quality is weak.
Gelobt: The first two videos before credits run out are found fun by some, many styles
Kritik: Bait-and-switch subscription documented by dozens of reviews, faces don't match the uploaded photos, yearly subscription also doesn't provide unlimited access, no refunds
Für wen: Avoid until the monetization structure changes
Platz 56. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 1.686 Bewertungen
22von 100
An aggressive monetization scheme wrapped in an AI generator shell: the subscription doesn't include credits, every video costs extra, and the actual functionality after payment is either unavailable or extremely limited.
Gelobt: Interface is relatively straightforward, has some features for book design work
Kritik: Subscription doesn't include real features, each video is an additional charge, app hangs and doesn't generate, interface is confusing, no refunds
Platz 57. Wert aus Rezensionen: 20 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 10.879 Bewertungen
20von 100
A video and photo generator where generation hangs for hours, doesn't follow prompts, and requires payment for both a subscription and separate coins.
Gelobt: Some users got sharp, realistic images
Kritik: Generation hangs for 12+ hours with no result. Prompts not followed: wrong gender, ethnicity, number of people. Subscription plus coins equals double payment. Trial period hard to cancel. No photo upload button.
Für wen: Not recommended until stability improves substantially
Platz 58. Wert aus Rezensionen: 20 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 6.266 Bewertungen
20von 100
An AI avatar and short video generator with catastrophic monetization: $80 per year delivers only 5 three-second videos per week, and additional credits are also required. Support is silent, refunds refused.
Gelobt: Interesting effects and animated avatars. Anime filters attract younger users. The concept works at a high level.
Kritik: 5 videos per week for $80/year feels like a scam. Dual monetization: subscription plus mandatory credits. Videos are 3 seconds. Text-to-video doesn't reproduce what's written in the prompt. Can't cancel a stalled processing job. Support doesn't respond. Watermark returned for users with an active subscription.
Für wen: Not recommended to anyone in its current monetization form.
Platz 59. Wert aus Rezensionen: 19 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 3.755 Bewertungen
19von 100
A tattoo idea generator with catastrophically poor generation quality and non-stop ads. Simple prompts produce random results, complex ones are completely ignored. Ad overload makes the free version unusable.
Gelobt: The concept of a themed generator for tattoo ideas is interesting in itself
Kritik: AI ignores detailed prompts, gives the same result for different requests, ads every few seconds, UI bugs hide the create button behind the keyboard
Platz 60. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,1★ · 4.644 Bewertungen
18von 100
A generator that consistently creates the wrong person: it takes payment, generates a video with someone else's face, doesn't return credits, and doesn't answer emails, one of the worst promise-to-delivery ratios in the category.
Gelobt: Large selection of scenes and styles, lots of themed presets during holiday periods
Kritik: Systematically generates the wrong person, credits charged for failed attempts with no compensation, dual billing (subscription plus coins), content disappears after holidays, support doesn't respond
Für wen: Not recommended, high risk of losing money without getting the promised result
Platz 61. Wert aus Rezensionen: 15 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 5.854 Bewertungen
15von 100
An AI avatar generator with a full set of toxic practices: an annual subscription that requires separate coins for every action, ad-view coins that never post, and output that doesn't resemble the user (head on a stranger's body, wrong gender). After a model update, previously good results stopped reproducing.
Gelobt: Before the model update, some users got impressive creative photos. Simple interface.
Kritik: Subscription plus mandatory coins equals double payment per action. Coins for watching ads are never credited. Generated photo doesn't resemble the user, wrong gender, someone else's body. Model degraded after update. Nothing can be done with the subscription alone without coins. One user bought an annual subscription and was never able to start working.
Für wen: Not recommended to anyone.
Zu den Bewertungen
Zwei Bewertungen — zwei Quellen
Sie helfen beim Vergleich von Apps, ersetzen aber nicht die Prüfung der eigenen Aufgabe.
Rezensionsbewertung · bis 100
Die gespeicherte Bewertung aus der inApp-Recherche zu den Rezensionstexten. Sie beurteilt die App im Archiv insgesamt, nicht die Zuverlässigkeit einer einzelnen Funktion.
Store-Bewertung · bis 5
Die Bewertung von der App-Seite zum Zeitpunkt der Datenerhebung. Aktuelle Bewertung und Version können abweichen.
In der archivierten Stichprobe dieses Themas: 61 Apps und 14.527 gelesene Rezensionen. Das ist der Gesamtumfang der Recherche, nicht die Zahl der Rezensionen pro App.
Ein Abstand zwischen den Bewertungen beweist keine Manipulation. Das Datum der Berechnung und die vollständige Methodik der Bewertung sind nicht im mobilen Archiv. Vergleich die Aufgabenbeschreibungen und die Originalzitate und prüf die Bedingungen in der aktuellen Version.
