Where generation truly follows the prompt and the avatar looks like you, and where the result is not what was promised. Les meilleures notes d’après le texte des avis : Gencraft AI Image Generator (65/100), Neko AI (62) et PixAI (62).
Note des avis : 65 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 2 076 notes
65sur 100
A generator with a strong community and custom model builder. The main drawback is heavy-handed censorship that blocks even swimsuits and women's legs, plus a free tier cut from 10 to 5 generations per day.
Points forts
Active community, custom model builder, great for book character creation, family-safe content
Reproches
Censorship applied unevenly by gender (male swimwear passes, female swimwear banned), daily limit halved without warning, realistic mode looks flat, limb deformations increased after recent updates
Pour qui : Authors and illustrators who need a safe generator for characters without NSFW content, with community access and custom models
Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 3 091 notes
62sur 100
An anime generator with relaxed limits on adult content. Works well with properly written tags, but after updates some users lose their accounts and purchased credits.
Points forts
Prompt freedom, tag responsiveness, daily free credits, built-in art publishing system
Reproches
Consumable grant lock bug causes some users to lose access and credits after payment, slow support, style filters sometimes break without refunding credits
Pour qui : Anime art fans and character creators for stories who are willing to learn the tag system
Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 1 788 notes
62sur 100
A solid anime generator with a rich LoRA library and a generous free credit system. The main problem is erratic moderation: SFW images get blocked while other users' inappropriate content stays up.
Points forts
Huge library of ready-made characters and LoRA, daily free credits, fast generation, web version works better than mobile
Reproches
Inconsistent content filtering, no way to delete images from your library, fewer models on mobile than on the site, other users' policy-violating images are not removed
Pour qui : Anime art fans who want a flexible system with LoRA without a big financial commitment
Rang 4. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 13 714 notes
58sur 100
One of the more honest AI art generators with a beginner-friendly interface, but paid avatars get stuck in generation for days and saved galleries periodically disappear.
Points forts : Most free features work well. Good for fantasy illustration without precise requirements. Beginners find it easy to pick up.
Reproches : Paid avatars enter generation and do not appear for days. Saved work vanishes repeatedly, and support does not respond. Poor accuracy on text and facial details.
Pour qui : Beginners exploring AI art who want a free visual playground without precise prompting
Rang 5. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 2 490 notes
58sur 100
Ideogram is known for best-in-class text and logo rendering in images. But the mobile app is a thin browser wrapper plagued by Cloudflare pop-ups that block paying subscribers.
Points forts : Sharp text and logo rendering, rich image detail, users return daily
Reproches : Cloudflare pop-ups lock paid accounts for a week, the app is just a webview with no native features, delete and privacy controls don't work even on paid tiers, color prompts are ignored
Pour qui : Logo designers and typographers willing to work through a browser rather than a native app
Rang 6. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 24 281 notes
55sur 100
One of the best AI video platforms for visual quality, but expensive and unpredictable: prompts are often misinterpreted, filters block neutral content, and credits burn for nothing.
Points forts : High visual quality in videos, ability to animate your own images, good consistency by market standards
Reproches : Very expensive monetization, unstable prompt following, aggressive content filters, generation queues, text in video is unreadable
Pour qui : Content creators and visual experimenters willing to spend a significant budget on AI video
Rang 7. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 7 448 notes
52sur 100
An AI avatar generator with a wide range of styles and cosplay that regular users genuinely enjoy, but it consistently fails on monetization: deceptive trials, unfair charges, and credits that never arrive create a toxic purchase experience.
Points forts : Wide style library including cosplay and anime. Gives 20 free credits daily so you can try without paying. Support sometimes responds quickly. Results are impressive when the app is stable.
Reproches : Credits don't arrive as promised. App crashes immediately. Avatars don't reproduce hair or eye color even when explicitly specified. Reports of $499 lifetime followed by a demand for another $99/month. The feedback button doesn't work.
Pour qui : Users who want to see themselves in different art styles and are sticking to the free daily credits only, not paying for a subscription
Rang 8. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 3 288 notes
52sur 100
A set of style filters with an aggressive credit model. The artistic effects work, but constant ads and credits that vanish into thin air reduce the enjoyment to almost nothing.
Points forts : Wide selection of art styles, fast generation, ability to use for free by watching ads
Reproches : Credits disappear without a trace, rendering slows down on paid subscriptions, weak prompt adherence, support is unreachable
Pour qui : Casual users who want to turn a photo into a 'Monet painting' once and don't mind burning credits
Rang 9. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 2 066 notes
52sur 100
An image generation app with solid capabilities that degraded after a monetization overhaul and tighter censorship. Strengths include a diverse feature set (outpainting, object removal), weaknesses are unpredictable filtering and broken promises.
Points forts : High-quality results in fantasy and anime styles, outpainting and object removal, cross-platform account across Mac and iPhone, no forced review before use
Reproches : Stopped working without explanation, censorship blocks harmless requests, users pushed to a subscription after purchasing lifetime access, generated text has errors, prompts frequently ignored
Pour qui : Artists and fantasy art fans willing to tolerate unpredictable filtering
Rang 10. Note des avis : 50 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 143 429 notes
50sur 100
An entertainment app for animating photos to trending dances and effects. The credit system is structured so the free trial lets you do almost nothing.
Points forts : Quickly creates fun photo animations. Viral format, works well for social media. Easy entry point into AI animation.
Reproches : Free trial gives 1,000 credits while any action costs 3,000. Several users report $80/month charges with no way to reach support. Faces in animations don't always match the original.
Pour qui : One-off social media fun with photos. Not for regular use due to expensive credits.
Rang 11. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 141 346 notes
48sur 100
Photo-to-cartoon and trending video effects. The output quality is fine for entertainment, but a $12.99/week subscription ($675/year) is wildly out of proportion to the product's value.
Points forts : Fun cartoon versions of photos. Trending dance videos with the user's face get laughs from everyone. Very simple to use.
Reproches : Subscription charges immediately after the trial without a warning, including for users who never opened the app. $12.99 per week with an annual cost of $675 is a clear value mismatch. Results are 'fun but not realistic'.
Pour qui : Anyone who wants a one-time laugh with cartoon photos. Cancel the subscription immediately after first use.
Rang 12. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 11 122 notes
48sur 100
An AI photo editor with reliable background and shadow removal, but after a few edits it stops following instructions and alters your face with any enhancement attempt.
Points forts : Background removal works consistently. Shadow removal is effective. Simple interface works well for beginners.
Reproches : After 2-3 edits it ignores new instructions and wastes credits. Alters facial features during restoration. A $70 annual subscription doesn't top up credits on schedule. No support.
Pour qui : Users who need simple one-off edits: remove a background, a shadow, or a random object
Rang 13. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 9 982 notes
48sur 100
A powerful web image generation tool that degraded in UI, censorship, and stability after its acquisition by Canva. Video generation (Veo 3) frequently errors out and tokens disappear for nothing.
Points forts : Real model power when it works, impressive results. Canvas with adjustable influence strength (30-95) is convenient for iterative editing. The platform's historical reputation.
Reproches : Constant Veo 3 errors with no token refunds. Censorship blocks even neutral prompts. iPad text-input bug. Auth breaks when logging in through the mobile app. Tokens vanish without explanation.
Pour qui : Power users who already know the platform and are willing to tolerate instability for quality results on the web version
Rang 14. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 4 433 notes
48sur 100
The best face swap in the category for core function quality, but reliability suffers: hangs in the queue, crashes on multi-face swaps, video is capped at 1 minute, and ads have an uncloseable X button.
Points forts : Basic photo swap works accurately and realistically, daily free tokens, wide selection of video templates
Reproches : Multi-face swap crashes, video capped at 1 minute for paying users, queue hangs for hours, ads won't close, output video loses quality compared to the source
Pour qui : Quick entertainment photo swaps for social media. Not suitable for video work or group scenes.
Rang 15. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 3 726 notes
48sur 100
A hybrid of AI character chat and image generation that has lost its direction. Long-time users complain about quality degradation and hypercensorship, newer users praise the character interactivity.
Points forts : Large character library, daily free crystals (200), animating your own drawings works well for some users
Reproches : Censorship blocks harmless content (hugs, swimwear), short AI memory (context resets after about 10 messages), image quality degraded after December 2025 updates
Pour qui : Users who want AI character chat rather than a pure image generator
Rang 16. Note des avis : 46 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 184 723 notes
46sur 100
Photo filters with AI effects that have been around for years. Strong point is the style library. Main issues: opaque pricing, app crashes while working, and faces become unrecognizable after AI processing.
Points forts : Large selection of filters and effects. Fast styled photo creation. Long track record.
Reproches : Three 'Premium' tiers at different prices with no clear distinction in features. App crashes when selecting photos for some users. Faces become unrecognizable after AI processing. Users report photos appearing in Google without consent.
Pour qui : Quick style experiments when face accuracy doesn't matter. Not for professional work.
Rang 17. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 28 429 notes
44sur 100
An editor with photo restoration and AI video: great at improving old photos, but requires you to pay separately for both a subscription and credits, and video frequently distorts faces.
Points forts : Old photo restoration is impressive, varied feature set, videos come out well when the system isn't glitching
Reproches : Dual monetization (subscription plus credits), faces in videos often don't match the original, credits burn on errors, confusing interface
Pour qui : Anyone who wants to restore old family photos or create a one-off AI video but doesn't plan to use it daily
Rang 18. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 7 314 notes
44sur 100
A professional Adobe AI tool with strong capabilities (Omni 3, timelines, sound effects), but a confusing credit system, regular feature outages, and weak prompt adherence make it unreliable even for paying users.
Points forts : Multi-scenario setup via Omni 3. Sound effects. 2K editing without spending credits. Integration with the Adobe ecosystem for those already working in it.
Reproches : Credits burn in 30 minutes of testing. Image-to-video is unavailable under high load even though you pay monthly. Timeouts charge credits with no result. Images don't follow prompts. Pro Plus is constantly unavailable. The app feels unfinished.
Pour qui : Adobe professionals who already have a Creative Cloud subscription and need a quick AI draft, not precise prompt following
Rang 19. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 3 010 notes
44sur 100
A photo animation app that impresses when it works, but stability is catastrophic: videos can't be downloaded, and the lifetime subscription doesn't deliver the promised unlimited templates.
Points forts : When it works, the output looks beautiful. Animations of nature scenes are convincing.
Reproches : Videos generate but can't be downloaded (an X appears instead of a button), templates don't open, support is in Chinese, lifetime promises unlimited but delivers a weekly credit allotment
Pour qui : Patient users who have time to deal with errors and don't expect refunds
Rang 20. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 1 645 notes
44sur 100
A Freepik platform with a rich set of models and tools, but a widespread subscription activation bug via the App Store. Real value exists in the web version, the mobile app works significantly worse.
Points forts : Large selection of AI models, video and images in one place, adjustable moderation, solid web version functionality
Reproches : App Store payments often fail to activate the plan, support doesn't respond, date filtering is broken, uploading images from files doesn't work, credits don't carry over between billing periods
Pour qui : Content creators and designers willing to work through the web version without relying on the mobile app
Rang 21. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 50 791 notes
42sur 100
A specialized tattoo sketch generator with real professional use by tattoo artists, but weak execution: styles are indistinguishable, complex imagery gets ignored, and ads are aggressive.
Points forts : Body preview feature is useful for client consultations, fast mockups for clients, simple designs come out reasonably well
Reproches : Complex and specific requests produce the same generic output regardless of style, style selection barely affects the result, ads after every action, adds random faces to animal photos
Pour qui : Tattoo artists for quick client consultations and anyone who wants a rough sketch of a simple design
Rang 23. Note des avis : 41 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 729 360 notes
41sur 100
A coloring book with AI filters, not an image generator. Ads every 5-30 seconds make the core mechanic unplayable. Paid access is required for almost any basic tool.
Points forts : Large selection of images to color. Relaxing format when there are no ads.
Reproches : Ads literally after every action, including lifting a pencil. Most tools and colors require watching an ad or making a payment. Automatic subscription on first launch without clear consent.
Pour qui : Kids whose parents are willing to pay to remove the ads. Adults with any quality expectations should look elsewhere.
Rang 24. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 137 512 notes
38sur 100
A photo editor with AI features that systematically moves previously free capabilities behind a paywall with every update. Image generation is unstable and follows prompts poorly.
Points forts : Wide set of photo editing tools. Good for adding text layers and overlays. Specific prompts occasionally produce decent results.
Reproches : After every update something previously free becomes paid. App crashes when loading photos on some devices. AI generation is unstable: often just pastes a face into someone else's photo. Text in generated images doesn't work. Popular features removed without notice.
Pour qui : Mobile photo editing with text layers if you're willing to pay a subscription. Not recommended as an AI generator.
Rang 25. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 86 139 notes
38sur 100
An AI photo enhancer with an unstable backend and aggressive monetization. When it works, colorization and old photo restoration are pleasant. When it doesn't, it can be down for weeks.
Points forts : Old photo colorization, hairstyle changes, resolution enhancement
Reproches : Backend goes down for hours and days, subscription cancellation requires third-party workarounds with no feedback, results sometimes look worse than the original
Pour qui : Family archive enthusiasts who can tolerate an unreliable service
Rang 26. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 32 770 notes
38sur 100
A feature-rich editor that degraded after updates: text-to-image stopped following prompts, familiar tools disappeared, and the monetization is dual-layered.
Points forts : Layer compositing tool, rich font selection, AI tools are good when they work
Reproches : Text-to-image produces random results instead of what's requested, updates keep breaking existing features, dual charges (subscription plus credits), frequent crashes
Pour qui : Social media users who need a multi-function editor and are willing to navigate a complex interface
Rang 27. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 4 074 notes
38sur 100
An image generator with acceptable visual quality but an extremely limited free tier and misleading 'unlimited' advertising. Only worthwhile for users who need one or two images and nothing more.
Points forts : A few users note good visual results and a comfortable onboarding experience
Reproches : Hard paywall after 3-10 free images, real daily limit even on paid tiers (5-10/day instead of advertised unlimited), saved albums disappear
Pour qui : The occasional user who needs one or two nice images every few days
Rang 28. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,0★ · 2 571 notes
38sur 100
A multi-function generator with photo restoration, artistic filters, and text-to-image. The watercolor mode gets praise, but portrait restoration blurs details, and text-to-image ignores prompts.
Reproches : Photo restoration produces blurry, noisy output and makes people look older, prompts ignored (dragon wings remain even after asking to remove them), no high-resolution export
Pour qui : Users who want to quickly add an artistic style to a photo, not precise text-based generation
Rang 29. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,1★ · 1 651 notes
38sur 100
Once a decent generator with Ghibli and anime styles, destroyed by an update that broke the old Pro plan and added a forced expensive subscription. Isolated reports of unstoppable charges.
Points forts : Good Ghibli style, some users got high-quality results, responsive support when credits were lost
Reproches : Update broke the old Pro plan without compensation, filtering blocks acceptable content, internal generation errors, unable to cancel subscription
Pour qui : Ghibli art fans who are okay with instability and an expensive subscription
Rang 30. Note des avis : 36 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 58 259 notes
36sur 100
An AI product photo generator for small business with a good concept but poor execution. Logos have typos, products get distorted, and scaling doesn't work.
Points forts : Fast background generation for clothing, variety of scenes for product shots
Reproches : Logos generate with errors, product scale is wrong, subscription cancellation is deliberately hidden, the app radically changed its feature set after purchase
Pour qui : Small businesses that need a quick simple background shot of a product without a logo
Rang 31. Note des avis : 36 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 22 225 notes
36sur 100
An AI art generator that worked well as a community tool, but a series of updates cut free credits, broke purchase transfers, and added overly aggressive filtering.
Points forts : Rich selection of art styles, ability to create custom styles, simple interface
Reproches : Free credits cut from 5 to 1 per day, purchased credits vanish upon registration, censorship blocks neutral female imagery, results often stray far from the prompt
Pour qui : Artists and AI art enthusiasts who want to experiment with styles and are willing to pay for credits
Rang 32. Note des avis : 36 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 1 512 notes
36sur 100
An AI generator stuck in an infinite loading loop for many users. When it works, results are imprecise but occasionally decent. A paid subscription often doesn't remove the limitations.
Points forts : Fast generation when it works, first results occasionally impress, free credits are available
Reproches : Generator hangs and shows jokes instead of images, prompts execute inaccurately, slow loading, can't delete images from the collection, paid subscription doesn't always unlock features
Pour qui : Casual users who need one quick generation and get lucky with the server
Rang 33. Note des avis : 35 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,3★ · 79 722 notes
35sur 100
An AI avatar generator that gets worse with every update. Once produced decent portraits, now generation hangs at 99%, and the output face almost never resembles the original.
Points forts : Variety of styles and animations when things go well, wide range of scenes
Reproches : Generation hangs and never finishes, face doesn't match the uploaded photo, paid credits don't arrive, models removed without compensation
Pour qui : Anyone who wants a one-time experiment without planning to use it long-term
Rang 34. Note des avis : 35 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 11 532 notes
35sur 100
A professional video generation tool with genuinely high-quality output, but catastrophically expensive for regular users: a $15 subscription runs out after two short clips.
Points forts : When the prompt works, animation quality is above average. Understands basic instructions quickly.
Reproches : $15 = 2 clips of 5 seconds each. Prompts ignored: background motion not added, descriptions violated. Credits charged even for failed generations. Text in video is unreadable. Gen 3 removed without notice.
Pour qui : Professionals with a budget who need quality over quantity. Not for high-volume content creation.
Rang 35. Note des avis : 33 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 74 915 notes
33sur 100
An AI image and video generator with an unstable backend and billing problems. Faces come out unnatural, text in images has errors, and the subscription attempts to charge again after cancellation.
Points forts : Simple interface, occasionally captures the right mood in art
Reproches : Stops generating after updates, faces look unnatural, text in images has spelling errors, multiple confusing pricing plans, attempted re-charges after cancellation
Pour qui : Casual curious users not planning to use it regularly
Rang 36. Note des avis : 32 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 143 831 notes
32sur 100
A pioneer of mobile AI generation that has degraded to near-scam territory. Five free generations per day, $99/year for a subscription, and broken login for existing users describe most reviews.
Points forts : Historically the first simple generator with abstract styles. A minimal prompt gives unpredictable, interesting results. The input image strength editing tool was useful.
Reproches : Only 5 generations per day on the free plan. Deleted all users' old generations. Does not honor purchased lifetime subscriptions. Images often ignore specific prompt details: wrong hair color, beard instead of clean-shaven. Video generation is blocked by content restrictions even on neutral requests.
Pour qui : Was for AI art beginners. Not recommended now due to product degradation and broken commitments to existing users.
Rang 37. Note des avis : 31 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,3★ · 65 349 notes
31sur 100
One of the first AI art generators, which betrayed early buyers by switching to a credit model after selling lifetime subscriptions. Landscapes are passable, people and complex scenes don't work.
Points forts : Landscapes and settings, recognition of art styles for users who know art history
Reproches : People come out poorly, prompts are largely ignored when working with a source photo, lifetime subscriptions cancelled without refunds, accounts deleted without notice
Pour qui : Anyone looking for landscape stylization who hasn't paid for a lifetime plan and just wants to try it
Rang 38. Note des avis : 30 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 7 451 notes
30sur 100
Points forts : Visually attractive pre-made wallpapers and animated backgrounds.
Reproches : No real prompt-based generation. The app asked users to leave 5 stars for unlocking content and then didn't deliver on the promise. Almost all content is paid. $7 per week for a wallpaper gallery. Inappropriate for the 12+ audience it targets.
Pour qui : Only for users who want attractive pre-made wallpapers and are willing to pay a subscription without expecting any AI generation.
Rang 39. Note des avis : 30 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 5 044 notes
30sur 100
An AI portrait generator that almost never recognizes the source face: adds hair to bald users, changes weight against settings, takes 30 minutes to generate, and charges credits even for bad results.
Points forts : Occasionally produces decent professional-looking shots, many style and background options
Reproches : Output face often doesn't resemble the original, requires a $5.99 pack on top of an annual subscription, credits charged for failed generations, support unreachable, wait time up to 30 minutes
Pour qui : Not suitable for free exploration, too unreliable for paying users
Rang 40. Note des avis : 30 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 3 045 notes
30sur 100
An AI avatar generator that promises realistic likeness but typically produces people of a different appearance or race, with artifacts and masculine features on female photos.
Points forts : Certain anime styles occasionally capture real facial features, there are interesting themed packs
Reproches : Avatars don't resemble the uploaded photo, fewer images delivered than promised, free trial charges money without warning, support doesn't respond
Pour qui : Not worth buying until face recognition accuracy improves dramatically
Rang 41. Note des avis : 30 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 1 615 notes
30sur 100
An abandoned app that stopped working normally after recent updates: constant crashes, lost lifetime subscriptions, disappeared features. Was good two years ago.
Points forts : Previously supported reference images and delivered high quality. The AI art generator concept was implemented clearly.
Reproches : Constant crashes after updates, lifetime subscriptions stopped working, features disappeared or changed, no developer updates, no racial diversity in generation output
Pour qui : No one, the app is effectively abandoned.
Rang 42. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 76 867 notes
28sur 100
An AI avatar app with bait-and-switch monetization. One in five results looks acceptable, while body and ethnicity change arbitrarily.
Points forts : Variety of themed templates, professional headshots occasionally come out well
Reproches : Coins charged with no result, body in the photo doesn't match the original, ethnicity and hair color change without being asked, the promised unlimited access turns into a trap
Pour qui : Hard to recommend to anyone given the current quality and payment scheme
Rang 43. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 31 808 notes
28sur 100
AI photo sessions with a solid visual foundation, but a blatantly predatory model: the subscription doesn't include photo sessions, each one is paid separately, and errors charge credits with no result.
Points forts : Some photos look realistic, the idea of professional portraits without a photographer is appealing
Reproches : Double billing (subscription plus credits per photo), frequent crashes on upload, body in the photo doesn't match the real user, ads show non-existent features
Pour qui : Not recommended to anyone in its current form due to opaque billing
Rang 44. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,2★ · 6 689 notes
28sur 100
A 'who do I look like' entertainment tool that charges $17.99 per week for unstable matches, misidentifies gender, and produces different results from the same photo every time. Not worth it for entertainment or accuracy.
Points forts : The concept is fun, and when it hilariously gets it wrong that's entertaining in itself.
Reproches : Requires payment before showing any result. $17.99/week and features still don't work after paying. Misidentifies gender even with long hair and pink clothing. Results aren't reproducible, the same photo gives different matches. Advertised as free.
Pour qui : Not recommended for anyone: the price sets expectations far too high for the quality delivered.
Rang 45. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 5 820 notes
28sur 100
An editor with an interesting style set that became a trap: terms change after payment, credits are cut every few months, and support goes silent.
Points forts : Wide style and theme selection, occasionally produces vivid portraits, combines video and photo in one app
Reproches : Credits cut from 7 to 5 to 3 per week after purchasing an annual plan, best themes removed without explanation, results often don't resemble the source photo, support doesn't respond
Pour qui : Not recommended to anyone, terms change retroactively and generation quality is below free alternatives
Rang 46. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 3 492 notes
28sur 100
An NFT creator with a good idea but unstable execution. The NFT creation interface is simple, but MetaMask minting breaks, the gallery crashes, and there's no support.
Points forts : Simple NFT art creation, low barrier to entry for crypto newcomers, handy tool for basic visual ideas
Reproches : Gallery crashes when scrolling, MetaMask minting doesn't work, too many ads every 30 seconds, no instructions or support
Pour qui : NFT newcomers who want to try creating simple art without serious intent to sell it
Rang 47. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 3 287 notes
28sur 100
A logo and photo background generator with attractive marketing copy, but results don't match the prompt, coins vanish without a refund, and editing burns the balance for a nonexistent result.
Points forts : The background swap concept for product photos is convenient for e-commerce, one logo example impressed a professional
Reproches : Text in generations is consistently distorted, objects not accurately reproduced, a 250-coin animation returns an error, support doesn't return coins, double billing documented
Pour qui : Not recommended to anyone until basic bugs with coins and generation accuracy are fixed
Rang 48. Note des avis : 27 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,2★ · 4 597 notes
27sur 100
A generator with interesting styles but broken infrastructure: the server is constantly overloaded, only 2 free attempts, AI Avatar requires separate payment on top of a subscription, and a $79.99 lifetime purchase regularly resets.
Points forts : Good at landscapes and abstract scenes, variety of styles
Reproches : Server error on queue with no credit refund, only 2 free images, AI Avatar is a hidden extra charge, $79.99 lifetime resets, support doesn't answer emails
Pour qui : Artists and designers who need landscapes and fantasy scenes, only if they can find a stable server window
Rang 49. Note des avis : 25 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 3 681 notes
25sur 100
A photo/avatar generator that without warning migrated to a new platform, voiding existing subscriptions. Image quality is described as adequate, but dual-paywall monetization and shutting down the old app are serious trust violations.
Points forts : Realistic photos with good source material, some users praise character accuracy with the right set of photos
Reproches : Migration to Clone AI without transferring subscriptions, $80 annual subscription voided, hands generate with distorted fingers, hair color and race change arbitrarily
Pour qui : This app should no longer be trusted given its history of forced migration
Rang 50. Note des avis : 24 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 5 731 notes
24sur 100
A third-party wrapper around someone else's model using the DALL-E 3 brand name: credits disappear if the screen locks during generation, $20-100/year required upfront, and results are weaker than other free tools.
Points forts : Occasionally handles simple requests, interface is more familiar than web-based tools
Reproches : Credits vanish if the phone locks during generation, heavy censorship on neutral requests, very little for free, results described as unrealistic by users who tried other apps
Pour qui : Not recommended, the real DALL-E is available more cheaply through ChatGPT
Rang 51. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,3★ · 16 764 notes
22sur 100
An anime generator with a non-functional core feature: it doesn't create anime, crashes on basic actions, shows adult content ads on launch, and a lifetime purchase doesn't protect against failures.
Points forts : Image quality is good when the app doesn't crash, some styles do work
Reproches : Crashes when opening basic tabs after an expensive purchase, doesn't generate anime style despite the name, aggressive adult content ads on launch, filters block neutral requests
Pour qui : Not recommended to anyone in its current state
Rang 52. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 13 715 notes
22sur 100
An image generator with virtually no prompt control, an ad after every action, and random explicit content appearing without being requested.
Points forts : Some users like the visual output, especially the realistic style
Reproches : Prompts ignored: wrong gender, extra characters, unrequested details added. Ad before every generation and when opening every variation. App crashes. Daily limit without warning.
Pour qui : Not suitable for serious work. Attracts users through NSFW content.
Rang 53. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,3★ · 4 984 notes
22sur 100
Classic bait-and-switch: the app promises to animate photos of deceased relatives and create AI videos, charges $49.99 per year, then demands more money for every single action, and results look nothing like the ads.
Points forts : The idea of bringing old photos of loved ones to life is emotionally compelling, some face animation effects work
Reproches : After $49.99/year an extra fee is required for every video, results look radically different from the ads, strangers appear in photos, hair is added to bald people, support doesn't respond
Pour qui : Not recommended to anyone in its current form
Rang 54. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,2★ · 3 939 notes
22sur 100
Photo animation promises more than it delivers. It generates clip-art instead of real faces, requires a subscription plus extra coins simultaneously, and the advertised features (specific movements, multiple people in frame) simply don't work.
Points forts : A small number of users report a pleasant transformation effect on a lucky generation
Reproches : Generated people don't resemble the original, dual monetization (subscription plus coins), advertised movements are absent, refunds not possible
Rang 55. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 2 880 notes
22sur 100
A video and avatar generator with an aggressive monetization trap: the subscription is advertised as unlimited but delivers only 2-3 generations before credits run out. Face transfer quality is weak.
Points forts : The first two videos before credits run out are found fun by some, many styles
Reproches : Bait-and-switch subscription documented by dozens of reviews, faces don't match the uploaded photos, yearly subscription also doesn't provide unlimited access, no refunds
Pour qui : Avoid until the monetization structure changes
Rang 56. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 1 686 notes
22sur 100
An aggressive monetization scheme wrapped in an AI generator shell: the subscription doesn't include credits, every video costs extra, and the actual functionality after payment is either unavailable or extremely limited.
Points forts : Interface is relatively straightforward, has some features for book design work
Reproches : Subscription doesn't include real features, each video is an additional charge, app hangs and doesn't generate, interface is confusing, no refunds
Rang 57. Note des avis : 20 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 10 879 notes
20sur 100
A video and photo generator where generation hangs for hours, doesn't follow prompts, and requires payment for both a subscription and separate coins.
Points forts : Some users got sharp, realistic images
Reproches : Generation hangs for 12+ hours with no result. Prompts not followed: wrong gender, ethnicity, number of people. Subscription plus coins equals double payment. Trial period hard to cancel. No photo upload button.
Pour qui : Not recommended until stability improves substantially
Rang 58. Note des avis : 20 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 6 266 notes
20sur 100
An AI avatar and short video generator with catastrophic monetization: $80 per year delivers only 5 three-second videos per week, and additional credits are also required. Support is silent, refunds refused.
Points forts : Interesting effects and animated avatars. Anime filters attract younger users. The concept works at a high level.
Reproches : 5 videos per week for $80/year feels like a scam. Dual monetization: subscription plus mandatory credits. Videos are 3 seconds. Text-to-video doesn't reproduce what's written in the prompt. Can't cancel a stalled processing job. Support doesn't respond. Watermark returned for users with an active subscription.
Pour qui : Not recommended to anyone in its current monetization form.
Rang 59. Note des avis : 19 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 3 755 notes
19sur 100
A tattoo idea generator with catastrophically poor generation quality and non-stop ads. Simple prompts produce random results, complex ones are completely ignored. Ad overload makes the free version unusable.
Points forts : The concept of a themed generator for tattoo ideas is interesting in itself
Reproches : AI ignores detailed prompts, gives the same result for different requests, ads every few seconds, UI bugs hide the create button behind the keyboard
Pour qui : No one at the current generation quality
Rang 60. Note des avis : 18 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,1★ · 4 644 notes
18sur 100
A generator that consistently creates the wrong person: it takes payment, generates a video with someone else's face, doesn't return credits, and doesn't answer emails, one of the worst promise-to-delivery ratios in the category.
Points forts : Large selection of scenes and styles, lots of themed presets during holiday periods
Reproches : Systematically generates the wrong person, credits charged for failed attempts with no compensation, dual billing (subscription plus coins), content disappears after holidays, support doesn't respond
Pour qui : Not recommended, high risk of losing money without getting the promised result
Rang 61. Note des avis : 15 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 5 854 notes
15sur 100
An AI avatar generator with a full set of toxic practices: an annual subscription that requires separate coins for every action, ad-view coins that never post, and output that doesn't resemble the user (head on a stranger's body, wrong gender). After a model update, previously good results stopped reproducing.
Points forts : Before the model update, some users got impressive creative photos. Simple interface.
Reproches : Subscription plus mandatory coins equals double payment per action. Coins for watching ads are never credited. Generated photo doesn't resemble the user, wrong gender, someone else's body. Model degraded after update. Nothing can be done with the subscription alone without coins. One user bought an annual subscription and was never able to start working.
Pour qui : Not recommended to anyone.
À propos des chiffres
Deux chiffres — deux sources
Elles aident à comparer les apps, mais ne remplacent pas la vérification de ta propre tâche.
Score des avis · jusqu’à 100
Le score conservé de l’étude inApp sur les textes des avis. Il évalue l’ensemble de l’app dans l’archive, pas la fiabilité d’une fonction précise.
Note de la boutique · jusqu’à 5
La note de la page de l’app au moment de la collecte. La note et la version actuelles peuvent différer.
Dans l’échantillon archivé de ce sujet : 61 apps et 14 527 avis lus. C’est le volume total de l’étude, pas le nombre d’avis par app.
Un écart entre les chiffres ne prouve pas de manipulation. La date de calcul et la méthode complète du score ne sont pas dans l’archive mobile. Compare les descriptions des tâches et les citations sources, et vérifie les conditions dans la version actuelle.
