Kalorien und Ernährung · 95 Apps · 29.286 gelesene Rezensionen
Die Texte zu den Apps sind auf Englisch.
Where calorie counting is accurate and easy, and where the food database is wrong and slow. Die besten Werte aus den Rezensionstexten: Cronometer (74/100), Happy Scale (74) und Bowelle (72).
Wert aus Rezensionen: 74 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 93.490 Bewertungen
74von 100
The most thorough free micronutrient tracker in the category: the only one that shows vitamins, minerals, and a full nutritional profile at no cost. A recent update degraded search results by pushing branded items ahead of generics, which seriously slows down daily logging.
Gelobt
Six years of loyal users stay for the micronutrient tracking alone. No other free app comes close.
Kritik
After the latest update, search ranks branded products above basics, so finding 'banana' now takes several screens of scrolling.
Für wen: People who track vitamins and minerals, not just calories
Wert aus Rezensionen: 74 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 57.474 Bewertungen
74von 100
An honest weight tracker with a strong smoothing and prediction algorithm that people use for years. The main pain point is that sync is unreliable, and some features (weigh-in notes) have moved behind a paywall.
Gelobt
The moving-average algorithm filters out daily noise and shows the real weight-loss trend.
Kritik
Apple Health sync lags, and without it the app loses most of its purpose.
Für wen: People who treat the scale as their primary weight-control tool
Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 2.214 Bewertungen
72von 100
For someone with IBS or Crohn's disease, Bowelle genuinely helps identify triggers and produces data in a format that is easy to share with a gastroenterologist. The feature set is niche but well executed, and users stick around for years.
Gelobt
A timeline of symptoms and food in one log that is convenient to show a gastroenterologist.
Kritik
Analytics do not find correlations automatically — you have to hunt for patterns in the data yourself.
Für wen: People with IBS, Crohn's disease, and other chronic digestive disorders
Platz 4. Wert aus Rezensionen: 69 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 7.241 Bewertungen
69von 100
Foodnoms stands out for its native depth across the Apple ecosystem: it works on iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Watch simultaneously, with no ads and careful attention to UI detail. The main limitations are a small food database and weak support for third-party fitness trackers.
Gelobt: Native Apple Health integration, water tracking, widgets, and Apple Watch support all in one app with no third-party compromises.
Kritik: The food database is small and often fails to find basic items or returns inaccurate nutrient data.
Für wen: Apple ecosystem users who want a native nutrition tracker without ads
Platz 5. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 156.005 Bewertungen
68von 100
MyNetDiary is one of the most accurate and usable nutrition trackers in the category: flexible unit entry, saved custom recipes, and solid handling of different goals (weight loss, gain) set it apart from competitors.
Gelobt: Users value the flexibility of entering portions in different units and an accurate database that helps track nutrition without constant errors.
Kritik: The interface requires moving between several screens for basic actions like adding a recipe, which slows down daily logging.
Für wen: People who care about data accuracy and flexible goal settings rather than pretty dashboards
Platz 6. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 95.245 Bewertungen
68von 100
A barcode scanner for food and cosmetic ingredients that quickly shows a rating and explains problematic ingredients. The main flaw is an open database with insufficient moderation, leading to errors, while identical products can receive incomparable scores due to a shallow algorithm.
Gelobt: People say the app literally changed their shopping habits: they now read labels and choose cleaner products.
Kritik: The scoring algorithm does not account for dosage and evaluates individual ingredients rather than the full formula, so similar products get different scores without a logical explanation.
Für wen: People who want to quickly check a product's ingredient list in the store
Platz 7. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 18.157 Bewertungen
68von 100
The best tool for serious macro tracking: a generous free tier, accurate net-carb counting, and an active gym community. The last major update complicated navigation, frustrating long-time users, but the core product remains strong.
Gelobt: A broad free tier with honest macro tracking and no mandatory subscription from day one.
Kritik: The latest update made the interface cluttered: six search points instead of one are confusing.
Für wen: Gym-goers who track protein, fat, and carbs by the gram and need accurate analytics
Platz 8. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 18.053 Bewertungen
68von 100
The strongest adaptive calorie algorithm tied to real metabolism, a great UI, and a fair price. The downsides are real: the nutrient database is rough in places, female physiology is not accounted for, and support is slow.
Gelobt: Adaptive calorie calculation based on actual body weight rather than formula-based activity estimates.
Kritik: The algorithm cuts calories to uncomfortable levels without explaining why, and adjusting manually is difficult.
Für wen: Serious macro trackers willing to pay for a smart algorithm
Platz 9. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 3.609 Bewertungen
68von 100
A smart coach that adapts weights and reps based on progress rather than just logging workouts. The weak side: the interface is overwhelming for casual users, there is no Apple Watch app, and some sessions are lost due to sync glitches.
Gelobt: Automatic load progression and plan customization for home equipment without manual editing.
Kritik: There is no way to automatically adjust the number of sets in custom programs.
Für wen: Intermediate lifters who want structured progression without hiring a coach
Platz 10. Wert aus Rezensionen: 67 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 7.861 Bewertungen
67von 100
Carbon offers smart weekly macro adjustments based on real check-in data, and consistent users see convincing results. The weak points are a limited food database and an algorithm that sometimes prescribes dangerously low calories for active women.
Gelobt: The weekly check-in with automatic goal adjustment based on real progress replaces the work of a personal nutrition coach.
Kritik: The food database is too small for a varied diet: users constantly have to create products manually or accept inaccuracies.
Für wen: Athletes and mindful users who want an adaptive macro plan based on real progress
Platz 11. Wert aus Rezensionen: 66 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 25.801 Bewertungen
66von 100
A well-built tracker with a rich food database, especially strong for UK users and those migrating from other platforms. The main downside is occasional technical issues for some subscribers and the absence of a recipe builder.
Gelobt: The food database is more accurate and broader than competitors', especially for branded products.
Kritik: There is no convenient way to enter custom recipes and calculate total nutrients per serving.
Für wen: People who take calorie counting seriously and value an accurate database
Platz 12. Wert aus Rezensionen: 66 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 14.326 Bewertungen
66von 100
A reliable free veteran with a huge food database and honest macro tracking. Search degraded after recent updates, and water tracking behind a paywall irritates long-time users.
Gelobt: A free database with millions of products and a clear food diary without unnecessary features.
Kritik: After recent updates the food search broke: even 'Twix' does not come up.
Für wen: Home cooks and long-term nutrition trackers who do not want to overpay
Platz 13. Wert aus Rezensionen: 66 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 10.262 Bewertungen
66von 100
A photo food diary without forced calorie counting occupies its niche and keeps people coming back for years. The AI food analysis sometimes produces absurd ratings like 'low in nutrients' for legumes, and a subscription locks most features.
Gelobt: The app's gentle tone helps build mindful eating habits without the anxiety that strict calorie counting causes.
Kritik: The AI meal rating often gets it wrong regardless of what is actually on the plate, and users cannot correct the verdict manually.
Für wen: People who want to track eating through photos without calorie counting
Platz 14. Wert aus Rezensionen: 65 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 21.981 Bewertungen
65von 100
The only meal planner in the category that generates a week's menu with an automatic shopping list and pantry tracking. For people tired of deciding what to cook it is genuinely useful, but recipes repeat, and the vegetarian selection is thin.
Gelobt: An automatic shopping list based on the weekly plan and pantry tracking save time when planning meals.
Kritik: Recipes get repetitive quickly, and customizing for specific allergies is difficult.
Für wen: People who want to plan meals a week ahead rather than just count calories
Platz 15. Wert aus Rezensionen: 63 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 730.524 Bewertungen
63von 100
Carb Manager is a specialized tracker with deep support for keto and low-carb diets: detailed macro tracking, fitness device sync, and a large recipe library genuinely help people stay on the diet.
Gelobt: Keto dieters note that detailed carb and sugar control helped lower blood sugar and achieve significant weight loss where other trackers fell short.
Kritik: The barcode scanner is unreliable, and keto-compatibility detection sometimes misfires on mixed recipes.
Für wen: People on keto or a low-carb diet who need detailed carb control
Platz 16. Wert aus Rezensionen: 63 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 5.593 Bewertungen
63von 100
The best AI photo tracker in the category, with good accuracy within 100 calories when a dish is described in detail. A recent update worsened the interface and removed the barcode scanner, triggering a wave of complaints from regular users.
Gelobt: Fast dish recognition by photo with the ability to refine the contents and get a reasonable calorie estimate.
Kritik: After the redesign there are more steps to log food, and removing the barcode scanner made working with packaged products harder.
Für wen: People who want to count calories by photographing food rather than typing everything manually
Platz 17. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 33.456 Bewertungen
62von 100
A mature macro tracker for people who take nutrition seriously: rich customization, a large food database, and responsive support. Recent updates broke the scanner and degraded search, and daily notes moved behind a paywall.
Gelobt: Flexibility in setting macro goals and ease of use once you have added your regular foods.
Kritik: After an update the barcode scanner now requires taking a photo instead of auto-scanning and often fails to read codes.
Für wen: People who track protein, fat, and carbs with precision and are used to detailed logging
Platz 18. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 28.476 Bewertungen
62von 100
The intermittent fasting timer works reliably and helps people stick to their schedule, especially those with ADHD and late-night snacking issues. The food tracker is weaker: you cannot edit a fast's start time, AI scanning is superficial, and ads in recent versions have become noticeably more aggressive.
Gelobt: The fasting timer with a widget and notifications genuinely maintains discipline and gives a sense of progress.
Kritik: You cannot set a past start time for a fast, which throws off the statistics.
Für wen: People practicing intermittent fasting who need a reliable timer above all
Platz 19. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 13.743 Bewertungen
62von 100
A mature and feature-rich tracker with deep analytics and solid Apple Health integration. Monetization is aggressive: users who paid for the premium version keep seeing subscription ads on top of what they already purchased.
Gelobt: Detailed nutrition and progress analytics with clear charts that are genuinely motivating.
Kritik: After buying the PRO version the app keeps pushing subscription offers at every launch.
Für wen: People who take nutrition science seriously and want data rather than just a diary
Platz 20. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 6.713 Bewertungen
62von 100
The app is valued for microbiome-based personalization and an emphasis on plant diversity rather than just calories. After a major update, loyal long-term users have been complaining en masse about gamification and the removal of text search in favor of mandatory photo logging.
Gelobt: Tracks the variety of plants in your diet and gives a personal score for each food.
Kritik: After the redesign you can no longer pre-enter recipes as text, and gamification annoys an audience that came for the science.
Platz 21. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 3.597 Bewertungen
62von 100
One of the best macro trackers for ease of entry: a 'points' system for completing a day builds habits. The main problem is regular crashes during food search and no Apple Health integration.
Gelobt: Gamification through points for hitting macros keeps users on track longer.
Kritik: The barcode scanner is unstable and often logs a completely different product than the one scanned.
Für wen: People who want to track protein, fat, and carbs with a light game element
Platz 22. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 2.384 Bewertungen
62von 100
The app calculates Weight Watchers points without monthly payments, and for its purpose it delivers honestly. The barcode scanner is broken for many users, and the restaurant database has not been updated in a long time.
Gelobt: Works for free without a subscription and quickly shows the points value of any product.
Kritik: There is no way to keep a daily log: the app is only a points reference, not a tracker.
Für wen: Weight Watchers followers who do not want to pay for the official app
Platz 23. Wert aus Rezensionen: 61 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 82.100 Bewertungen
61von 100
A specialized keto tracker with a good restaurant food database, built-in recipes, and ready-made meal plans. The main weakness is inaccurate macro data for manually added foods and almost all functionality locked behind a paywall.
Gelobt: Keto beginners especially value the ready-made meal plans and automatic macro ratio calculation for their goal.
Kritik: Macro data for basic foods (like chicken wings) diverge from reality, which throws off the daily carb count.
Für wen: People just starting keto who want a ready plan without doing their own calculations
Platz 24. Wert aus Rezensionen: 61 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 24.046 Bewertungen
61von 100
A minimalist tracker with no forced registration and no ads, aimed at people who want facts without the noise. A broad CalorieKing database and custom recipe support make it a working tool, though the barcode scanner and Apple Health integration lag behind competitors.
Gelobt: No mandatory registration and no ads paired with an extensive food database is a rare combination.
Kritik: The barcode scanner finds only a small fraction of products, so most entries are added manually.
Für wen: People who want to simply log food without gamification or subscriptions
Platz 25. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.677 Bewertungen
60von 100
One of the few trackers where a meal plan is generated automatically to match macros and budget, and the recipes genuinely appeal to families. Weak points: you cannot add your own food instead of a suggested item, and the app sometimes glitches like a web wrapper.
Gelobt: Automatic weekly menu generation accounting for budget and prep complexity.
Kritik: You cannot swap a plan meal for your own or adjust portion size without rebuilding the entire plan.
Für wen: People who want a ready nutrition program rather than just a calorie diary
Platz 26. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 2.351.494 Bewertungen
58von 100
WeightWatchers is a mature weight-management program with a precise points-based system, undermined by a series of UI redesigns: key flows now require extra taps, and recently eaten food is hard to find.
Gelobt: Users say the points system helped build a genuine habit of mindful eating rather than just counting calories.
Kritik: Each major redesign breaks familiar flows: quickly adding frequent meals, viewing protein and fiber by meal, navigating between days.
Für wen: People already familiar with the WW methodology who are willing to tolerate app instability
Platz 27. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 12.183 Bewertungen
58von 100
An honest free fasting timer with no ads and no extra features. It does one thing, but with a critical limitation: you cannot edit the start or end time, making tracking inaccurate any time you forget.
Gelobt: Works without registration, without ads, and without a subscription: just a timer that counts fasting hours.
Kritik: You cannot change the start or end time of a fast after the fact, which corrupts the entire history with a single mistake.
Für wen: People practicing intermittent fasting who never forget to press the button
Platz 28. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 11.811 Bewertungen
58von 100
The Renaissance Periodization methodology genuinely works for athletes cutting or bulking, and long-term users confirm it. But a major redesign broke the interface: navigation became confusing, AI macro redistribution gets in the way of manual control, and support is nearly unreachable.
Gelobt: Meal timing around workouts and weekly macro adjustments provide structure that ordinary calorie counters lack.
Kritik: After the redesign the app is hard to use with a non-standard schedule or varied diet: there is no quick calorie entry without creating a new product.
Für wen: Athletes and bodybuilders following RP protocols who are willing to work through the interface
Platz 29. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 3.324 Bewertungen
58von 100
A free tracker with AI plate recognition and detailed nutrient breakdown that competes honestly with paid alternatives. The app loses data after crashes, and AI sometimes hallucinates nutrients even when scanning a clear label.
Gelobt: Nutrient balance analysis and specific recommendations for improving your diet directly in the meal card.
Kritik: Manually editing after an AI error does not recalculate the overall health score.
Für wen: Mindful eating beginners who care about diet quality feedback rather than just numbers
Platz 30. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 2.765 Bewertungen
58von 100
For a diabetic using a Libre or Dexcom, SNAQ genuinely helps lower A1c by connecting glucose and food data on one screen. After each major update something breaks, and users have to relearn the app.
Gelobt: A detailed three-hour report on glucose response to a specific meal.
Kritik: The food database is small, and user-created recipes with custom ingredients do not calculate net carbs.
Für wen: Diabetics with a Libre or Dexcom continuous glucose monitor
Platz 31. Wert aus Rezensionen: 57 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 4.034 Bewertungen
57von 100
The only dedicated food intolerance diary in the selection rather than a calorie tracker: it helps find correlations between food and symptoms. The analysis algorithm is weak and can flag 'water' as the main trigger, and the registration flow with a nickname selection often freezes.
Gelobt: Helps identify real food triggers in chronic illness through a symptom diary.
Kritik: The correlation algorithm gives false positives and does not always deliver useful insights after weeks of logging.
Für wen: People with IBS, food allergies, or intolerances who need a symptom log
Platz 32. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 71.855 Bewertungen
55von 100
An app for controlling Levoit smart devices (scales, air purifiers, humidifiers) with no direct relevance to nutrition or calorie tracking. The core function works reliably, but aggressive in-dashboard ads for other products irritate almost everyone.
Gelobt: Smart scale users appreciate the convenient body composition tracking over time and straightforward initial setup.
Kritik: The app has turned into an ad platform: banners and offers to buy new devices appear right on the screen controlling your current one.
Für wen: Owners of Levoit and VeSync devices for remote control
Platz 33. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 48.637 Bewertungen
55von 100
A mature tracker with a large food database and integrations, but after a series of updates it has become pushy: non-stop tips that cannot be turned off and animations slow down the basic action of adding food. Some previously free features moved behind a paywall without notice.
Gelobt: The food database is extensive and handles food from many different countries well.
Kritik: After every meal entry, tips and animations pop up that cannot be dismissed even in the paid version.
Für wen: People who eat a varied diet and can tolerate an intrusive UX in exchange for a broad food database
Platz 34. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 15.429 Bewertungen
55von 100
The best choice among Spanish-language trackers thanks to adapted food databases and a flexible meal planner. The scanner and recipe stability leave something to be desired.
Gelobt: The meal planner selects dishes based on available ingredients and nutrition goals.
Kritik: Saved recipe macros change when reopened without any visible reason.
Für wen: Users who want a ready meal plan rather than a blank diary
Platz 35. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 8.919 Bewertungen
55von 100
For keto eating the app offers more customization depth than most alternatives, and long-term users genuinely maintain their weight for years. The main weaknesses are occasional total data loss and no fiber tracking for net carbs.
Gelobt: Keto veterans value the simple setup and the fact that the app keeps them on track without unnecessary noise.
Kritik: The app periodically wipes all history and saved favorite foods, forcing users to re-enter everything.
Für wen: People following a keto diet who want a specialized tracker without clutter
Platz 36. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 6.055 Bewertungen
55von 100
A simple tracker with a large food database that works well for basic calorie and macro counting. The core problem: the database was crowd-sourced without verification, so the same product often has several entries with different and incorrect values.
Gelobt: Meal reminders and the ease of adding dishes through a large food database.
Kritik: The user database has many duplicates and inaccurate entries, especially for fast food and scanned barcodes.
Für wen: People starting to track their diet who want a simple free tool
Platz 37. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 3.565 Bewertungen
55von 100
Photo food recognition works accurately enough to replace manual entry and covers local restaurants and unusual dishes. The five-entry-per-day limit on the free plan and variable macro accuracy undermine confidence in the results.
Gelobt: Describing a dish in text instead of searching a database significantly speeds up logging a familiar diet.
Kritik: The same product entered three different ways gives three different calorie answers.
Für wen: Users who eat varied food and do not want to spend time searching for every dish
Platz 38. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 2.199 Bewertungen
55von 100
An appealing AI photo-tracking concept, but the GPT engine regularly gets portions and calories wrong and customer support does not respond. The foundation is still unstable.
Gelobt: You can photograph a plate and get a macro breakdown without manual entry.
Kritik: The AI systematically hallucinates portions and assigns food to the wrong day when a photo is uploaded.
Für wen: Beginners who value speed of entry over numerical accuracy
Platz 39. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 762.502 Bewertungen
52von 100
Lose It! is a functional calorie counter with a broad food database and macro support, but aggressive monetization through ads after every action and previously free features moving behind a paywall significantly reduce the value of the free version.
Gelobt: Long-term users say the app helps build lasting dietary control and genuinely works for weight loss with consistent use.
Kritik: The food database contains user entries with incorrect data, and recipes are difficult to create due to a confusing interface.
Für wen: People willing to buy a subscription for a clean ad-free experience
Platz 40. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 82.058 Bewertungen
52von 100
A combo app for workouts and meal planning that stopped receiving updates roughly two years ago. Those who used it while it was functional lost 25 to 40 kg thanks to short HIIT sessions and weekly meal plans, but now login and subscription payment often do not work.
Gelobt: Users who started in 2017 to 2019 praise the 20-minute workouts — ideal for people with ADHD and packed schedules.
Kritik: The app is effectively abandoned: Google login is broken, subscriptions cannot be purchased, and some workouts were removed without replacements.
Für wen: People who want to combine short workouts with a ready meal plan — if the app launches at all
Platz 41. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 42.836 Bewertungen
52von 100
A tracker with a good food database and an honest free model, but with a critical reliability problem: the server regularly goes offline for days or weeks, and during each outage some users lose their entire food history and custom recipes.
Gelobt: A large restaurant and prepared-food database makes tracking easier for people who frequently eat out.
Kritik: Food history and custom recipes are periodically wiped during technical outages with no recovery option.
Für wen: People willing to accept an unreliable infrastructure in exchange for free tracking with a restaurant database
Platz 42. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 16.149 Bewertungen
52von 100
Gamification and visual style keep users logging for months, but the functional core is shaky: the scanner often misses, portion setup is unintuitive, and the color-rating algorithm for meals raises doubts.
Gelobt: Game quests and flora progress motivate keeping a food diary without willpower.
Kritik: The barcode and photo scanner frequently returns incorrect data, and correcting it is harder than re-entering from scratch.
Für wen: People who need motivation to stick with tracking rather than precision to the gram
Platz 43. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 7.733 Bewertungen
52von 100
The simplest interface in the category: no extra screens, fast entry. But the barcode scanner is unreliable, ads in the free version have become aggressive, and recent updates brought freezes while editing.
Gelobt: A 'here is how much more you can eat' prompt right below the food entry field helps make decisions before the first bite.
Kritik: The barcode scanner does not read most everyday products, forcing users to enter everything manually.
Für wen: People who want an extremely simple free tracker with no extra features
Platz 44. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 7.054 Bewertungen
52von 100
A free tracker with AI food entry and a barcode scanner valued for its simplicity and lack of a subscription. However, search and the scanner have periodically broken completely, and AI sometimes gives widely varying estimates for the same dishes.
Gelobt: A free core without a subscription and a straightforward interface without unnecessary screens.
Kritik: The food database is small, search breaks after updates, and AI gives inconsistent results for the same dishes.
Für wen: People who want to count calories for free without extra features
Platz 45. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 3.622 Bewertungen
52von 100
The only reliable alternative tracker for older Weight Watchers plans that the official app no longer supports. Problems restoring a subscription after switching phones spoil the experience for long-term users.
Gelobt: Support for WW Purple, Blue, and Green plans at a significantly lower subscription cost.
Kritik: The food database is sparse in the free version, and the barcode scanner fires inconsistently.
Für wen: Classic Weight Watchers fans whose plan was discontinued or made more expensive
Platz 46. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 3.177 Bewertungen
52von 100
The app combines a food diary, workouts, and live coaches in one place, and for dedicated brand fans it genuinely works. But stability is poor: data disappears, macros do not update without an app restart, and notifications fire twenty times in a row.
Gelobt: A live coach inside the app that competitors do not offer.
Kritik: The app does not save custom products and resets progress on glitches.
Für wen: 1st Phorm supplement buyers who want a single hub with a coach
Platz 47. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 1.784 Bewertungen
52von 100
A deliberately minimalist counter with no database and no subscription, suitable for people who know their macros by heart. The critical flaw is one: an entered record cannot be corrected, only the entire day can be reset.
Gelobt: No registration, no ads, no subscription: just sliders for protein, fat, and carbs.
Kritik: No individual entry can be edited or deleted — only the entire day can be wiped.
Für wen: Experienced keto dieters who want a bare counter with no frills
Platz 48. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 40.493 Bewertungen
48von 100
A companion app for Polar heart rate monitors that works when a stable connection is established. Bluetooth connectivity is unreliable, there is no Live Activities support on the lock screen, and the sports list was unexpectedly cut in recent updates.
Gelobt: With a stable connection it delivers accurate real-time heart rate zone data better than Apple Watch.
Kritik: No Live Activities — to see your heart rate during a workout you have to unlock the phone every time.
Für wen: Owners of Polar chest heart rate monitors willing to tolerate unreliable Bluetooth
Platz 49. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 21.278 Bewertungen
48von 100
The app draws users in with its design and the AI dish recognition feature, but that key tool is unstable and frequently returns an error. Batch-adding multiple items was removed in an update, portions are hard to configure, and some users note an unhealthy 1,000-calorie minimum.
Gelobt: When AI recognition works it genuinely removes logging friction and gives an accurate nutrient breakdown.
Kritik: You cannot add multiple items in one action: each product must be entered individually, which slows down diary keeping.
Für wen: Users who want to log food by photo and do not mind working with an unstable tool
Platz 50. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 17.710 Bewertungen
48von 100
Photo recognition draws users in, but the food database is thin, accuracy is inconsistent, and technical quality has declined: the app starts freezing after a few days of use.
Gelobt: Fast photo recognition of dishes without having to search for a product manually.
Kritik: The same dish shows different calories across different photos, making the data unreliable.
Für wen: Beginners who need a quick start without manual entry
Platz 51. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 7.824 Bewertungen
48von 100
The app works as a convenient calorie counter with a clean interface, but a large-scale paywall move for previously free features broke trust with a big part of the audience. For users who pay, AI voice entry and scanning provide real speed gains, though AI accuracy is low.
Gelobt: The ring visualization of the daily calorie limit and fast food search make daily diary keeping pleasant.
Kritik: AI dish recognition and voice entry need constant manual verification due to low accuracy.
Für wen: Users who already bought a lifetime pass and have been keeping a diary for years
Platz 52. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 5.432 Bewertungen
48von 100
A mature tracker with a solid food database that some users have relied on for six years and praise for stability. The core problem: developers have repeatedly moved previously free features behind a paywall without warning, which has seriously eroded trust.
Gelobt: The barcode scanner finds products from Whole Foods and Costco that other apps do not have.
Kritik: Developers move previously accessible features behind a paywall without announcement, and data is sometimes lost after updates.
Für wen: People who track macros without needing complex AI features
Platz 53. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 2.199 Bewertungen
48von 100
Once a very flexible tracker with a long history, but the move to a subscription model broke data access for some users and alienated those who had paid for a lifetime license. The product value is real, but trust has been damaged.
Gelobt: Full freedom to customize fields and templates plus clear multi-year observation charts.
Kritik: When exporting data or syncing between devices, Google authorization is regularly required and often fails.
Für wen: Methodical people who want to keep several trackers in one place
Platz 54. Wert aus Rezensionen: 47 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 867.309 Bewertungen
47von 100
Noom combines behavioral eating education with tracking and coach access, which genuinely works for some users, but the interface has become heavy and overloaded with gamification after several updates.
Gelobt: The approach combining behavioral psychology, a food diary, and a live coach in one place helps people change their relationship with food rather than just count calories.
Kritik: No fiber tracking at a premium subscription price, and the push notification reward animations ('seeds') that cannot be turned off irritate even loyal users.
Für wen: People who need behavioral support and a coach rather than just a calorie counter
Platz 55. Wert aus Rezensionen: 46 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 2.276 Bewertungen
46von 100
The capybara pet gamification genuinely motivates some users, and basic food tracking works. But the rewards shop is empty, support does not reply, and some food entry mechanics are broken.
Gelobt: Gamification through pet customization makes daily tracking less boring.
Kritik: The reward mechanic (the capybara shop) has been abandoned by developers and not updated in a long time.
Für wen: Young users and teens who find a standard food diary boring
Platz 56. Wert aus Rezensionen: 45 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 77.525 Bewertungen
45von 100
A once-strong tracker with a unique letter-grade food quality rating that now suffers from an outdated database, an inability to edit added foods, and unreliable performance. Long-term users document regression rather than progress.
Gelobt: The idea of grading foods from A to D by nutritional value rather than just calories still appeals to people who want to understand food quality, not just numbers.
Kritik: The database covers non-American and niche products poorly, and user-added items cannot be edited after saving.
Für wen: People who want to assess product quality by composition rather than count calories
Platz 57. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 2.339.777 Bewertungen
44von 100
MyFitnessPal was once the industry standard for calorie tracking. Today it is fragmented by several waves of redesigns: the food database is extensive but data accuracy is unreliable, and key features like voice entry and the scanner are unstable.
Gelobt: A large food database and fitness tracker integrations cover most typical diets without manual entry.
Kritik: Nutrient values in the user database are regularly inaccurate, and editing or verifying them without a subscription is impossible.
Für wen: People who already keep a food diary and want fitness device integration
Platz 58. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 87.706 Bewertungen
44von 100
A nutrition tracker with a meal planner and Apple Health integration that lost basic features after a major redesign: gram-based entry was removed, saving meals does not work, and calories randomly double. Users who return after a year do not recognize the app.
Gelobt: Before the redesign, long-term users praised a clean minimal interface and meaningful weight-loss results over two years.
Kritik: The update removed gram and weight-based portion entry, leaving only servings — a critical regression for people who weigh their food.
Für wen: People managing their weight without deep nutrient tracking
Platz 59. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 5.971 Bewertungen
44von 100
Combines nutrition tracking with access to real dietitians and an AI assistant, and for some users the coaching component works well. Core product problems: AI photo recognition gives a 100-calorie spread for the same photo, and Garmin sync does not work.
Gelobt: Live dietitian coaches who adapt the plan to a specific lifestyle.
Kritik: The AI photo tracker is inconsistent: the same dish is calculated differently on different days.
Für wen: People who want to work with a personal dietitian through an app
Platz 60. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 3.234 Bewertungen
44von 100
A clean interface and third-party integrations make a good first impression, but the food database is oriented toward the European market and does not cover common American products. The absence of previous-day browsing makes progress analysis impossible.
Gelobt: The badge and reward system maintains motivation in the first few weeks of use.
Kritik: Portion units are limited to ounces with no gram or cup alternatives.
Für wen: Users in Europe or those who want to combine calorie tracking with fitness goals
Platz 61. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 24.463 Bewertungen
42von 100
Previously the app stood out with an avatar and game mechanics that motivated users — one reviewer lost 89 kg on the old version. After the redesign the interactivity disappeared, and data loss on glitches happens regularly.
Gelobt: The old version with an avatar and bright colors created real motivation and an engaging experience.
Kritik: No backup: switching phones or deleting the app means losing all history completely.
Für wen: People who need a simple food diary that works offline
Platz 62. Wert aus Rezensionen: 41 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 707.966 Bewertungen
41von 100
BetterMe positions itself as a fitness coaching app rather than a nutrition tracker: workouts and pelvic exercises are central, while the food diary is rough and inconvenient.
Gelobt: Users looking for structured progressive workouts report real gains in flexibility and strength within the first few weeks.
Kritik: Food entry is significantly harder than in dedicated apps: there is no flexibility for meal swaps or personalization for dietary restrictions.
Für wen: Fitness beginners who care more about movement than precise calorie tracking
Platz 63. Wert aus Rezensionen: 40 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 149.916 Bewertungen
40von 100
Lifesum was a respected nutrition tracker with an attractive design, but the switch to AI-based food entry brought instability: data does not save, the calorie limit resets on its own, and AI systematically misjudges portions.
Gelobt: Experienced users note that restaurant meal estimation by photo works noticeably better than competitors once you learn the app.
Kritik: After switching to AI entry the app regularly loses logged data and offers no way to return to manual entry as the default mode.
Für wen: People who value design and can tolerate instability in exchange for convenient AI scanning
Platz 64. Wert aus Rezensionen: 40 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 61.942 Bewertungen
40von 100
A basic keto tracker with a limited free tier (5 to 6 products per day) and a weak database where the barcode scanner frequently returns wrong carb values. The app deletes data on crashes and does not allow editing added products.
Gelobt: The few satisfied users value a simple interface and automatic macro adjustment when weight changes.
Kritik: The barcode scanner regularly returns incorrect carb data, which is critical for keto where precise counting matters most.
Für wen: People who want the cheapest keto tracker and can accept inaccuracies
Platz 65. Wert aus Rezensionen: 40 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 6.197 Bewertungen
40von 100
The app offers ready-made meal plans with recipes and shopping lists, and when it loads the basic scenario works reasonably well. But it regularly stops opening for weeks at a time, and the ingredient entry interface got significantly more complex after an update.
Gelobt: Ready plans with recipes and an automatic weekly shopping list.
Kritik: Ingredient search became inconvenient after an update, and the app periodically refuses to open for hours.
Für wen: People who want a ready meal plan rather than keeping a diary themselves
Platz 66. Wert aus Rezensionen: 40 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 2.303 Bewertungen
40von 100
An intermittent fasting timer that works simply and without fuss, valued by people who need a pure hour counter. But session storage is unreliable: fasting history disappears, making progress tracking impossible.
Gelobt: A minimal fasting timer without an overloaded interface.
Kritik: The app loses fasting history and logs users out after a few days.
Für wen: People practicing intermittent fasting who need a minimal timer
Platz 67. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 445.284 Bewertungen
38von 100
Zero is a minimalist intermittent fasting timer that worked as a simple clean tool, but after moving to a mandatory subscription it lost its core appeal: there is effectively no free access to the main feature.
Gelobt: When it was available, the visual 'fat-burning flame' and simple fast timer helped people sustain long fasting windows.
Kritik: The app no longer works as a precise tracking tool: you cannot go back and log a missed meal, and users find the macro recommendations inaccurate.
Für wen: People who practice intermittent fasting and are willing to pay just for a timer
Platz 68. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 142.923 Bewertungen
38von 100
A habit tracker with a clean interface and widgets that has no relation to nutrition or calories. Key complaints: device sync breaks, lifetime purchase activations fail, and history resets when a goal is changed.
Gelobt: Bright colors, a convenient habit-marking swipe, and a lock-screen widget are liked by most users.
Kritik: Changing a goal destroys all history, and iCloud sync reliably fails after a device change.
Für wen: People who need to track up to 6 habits for free with no nutrition component
Platz 69. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 28.746 Bewertungen
38von 100
The app looks simple but the food database is incomplete, calories for many items are listed inaccurately, and adding unfamiliar food is a challenge. Users who figure out the interface praise the ease of keeping a diary, but most give up within the first few days.
Gelobt: A home-screen widget and simple entry for common dishes appeal to people with a standard diet.
Kritik: The food database is small, incorrect data cannot be fixed, and the barcode scanner frequently fails to find products.
Für wen: Beginners who just need a food diary with no deep analytics
Platz 70. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 7.669 Bewertungen
38von 100
A photo food diary without calorie counting suits people with GI issues or those who just want to see their diet. But aggressive ads in the paid version, data loss, and an inconvenient PDF export make the experience unreliable.
Gelobt: Scrolling through a photo feed of meals from several days ago helps identify the cause of a reaction to a product.
Kritik: Upgrade banner prompts appear on literally every tap, even for paying users.
Für wen: People with food intolerance who need a visual nutrition log
Platz 71. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 6.772 Bewertungen
38von 100
The app does exactly one thing: remind you to eat on schedule, and it manages that when it works. Several consecutive updates broke the critical notification function and caused crashes, which is unacceptable for a meal reminder.
Gelobt: A clean interface without extra noise — well suited for people with suppressed appetite from medication or eating disorders.
Kritik: There is no 'ate' button in the watch notification, and notifications stop arriving after updates.
Für wen: People who only need a meal-time reminder
Platz 72. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 3.923 Bewertungen
38von 100
An app with an appealing concept but systemic reliability problems: the scanner stopped working, food cannot be added, and data is lost on restart. Users note regression compared to earlier versions.
Gelobt: Simple logic and a free food database with restaurants and fast food attract beginners.
Kritik: The recipe builder does not allow setting a gram-based portion — only whole or fractional servings.
Für wen: Calorie-counting beginners who value simplicity over detailed settings
Platz 73. Wert aus Rezensionen: 37 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 21.141 Bewertungen
37von 100
The app positions AI as its main value, but the scanner gives contradictory results on two consecutive attempts and user-entered data changes by itself. Account loss after an update for several users is a critical warning sign.
Gelobt: Voice food entry lowers the barrier for people who are reluctant to type each product manually.
Kritik: AI scanning systematically gets calories and protein wrong, and correcting the data is inconvenient.
Für wen: People who want to try AI tracking and can accept low initial accuracy
Platz 74. Wert aus Rezensionen: 36 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 48.537 Bewertungen
36von 100
An AI tracker that photographs food but misses by 400 to 800 calories and confuses chicken with chips. Several users lost a month of data with no recovery through support.
Gelobt: The idea of photographing a plate instead of manually searching for products is convenient for low-effort tracking.
Kritik: Recognition accuracy is too low for real dietary control — the margin of error can reach 800 kcal per meal.
Für wen: People who only need a rough sense of balance rather than precise counting
Platz 75. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 333.540 Bewertungen
35von 100
Cal AI bets on photo dish recognition, but calorie estimation accuracy is unreliable even when scanning a barcode, and the absence of fitness tracker integrations and scant nutrient detail make it a toy rather than a working tool.
Gelobt: Users are attracted by the instant photo recognition idea, and for familiar home-cooked food or restaurant items it sometimes works surprisingly well.
Kritik: Calorie recognition when scanning a barcode regularly gives wrong results, and suggested macro targets users describe as simply incorrect.
Für wen: People who want quick approximate food control without deep analytics
Platz 76. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 23.299 Bewertungen
35von 100
The idea of photographing a dish instead of manual entry is appealing, and some users do achieve results. But AI regularly gets portions and calories wrong, data can change without the user knowing, and losing all history on reinstall makes the tool unreliable.
Gelobt: Photo scanning of a plate reduces logging friction and allows people who previously gave up on tracking to reach their goal.
Kritik: Calorie values change spontaneously after saving, making the diary untrustworthy.
Für wen: People just starting to count calories who can accept approximate accuracy
Platz 77. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 13.177 Bewertungen
35von 100
A clean interface hides serious problems: the AI scanner is unreliable for real tracking, features are removed without warning, and support goes silent. Users leave disappointed more often than satisfied.
Gelobt: A clean and fast interface; photo scanning handles simple dishes.
Kritik: AI miscounts portions for unpackaged foods, and there is no way to set an amount in grams.
Für wen: People who want an aesthetically pleasing tracker for simple dishes and do not expect precision
Platz 78. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 3.816 Bewertungen
35von 100
AI scanning works reasonably, but data accuracy is unstable: one dish gets 250 kcal instead of a real 1,050. Navigation is inconvenient, dishes cannot be deleted, and the logging date often resets.
Gelobt: Photo-based food recognition lowers the barrier for users who do not want to enter data manually.
Kritik: Nutrients cannot be entered manually if a dish is not found in the app's database.
Für wen: Users who want to photograph a plate instead of scanning barcodes
Platz 79. Wert aus Rezensionen: 33 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 48.806 Bewertungen
33von 100
A tracker with an attractive interface but a broken barcode scanner that does not work for most users and chaotic cross-device sync. Some users discovered all data for six months had been reset.
Gelobt: The interface is intuitive and uncluttered — easy for beginners to navigate.
Kritik: The barcode scanner fails to read most packaging, and manual entry takes too long.
Für wen: Beginners who are fine with manually logging calories without scanning
Platz 80. Wert aus Rezensionen: 32 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 2.829 Bewertungen
32von 100
A good concept and a clean design, but the app fails to save entries about half the time, and the timer fires without recording anything. New parents cannot afford an unreliable tracker.
Gelobt: Clean and clear visual design without unnecessary elements.
Kritik: No shared mode for two parents, even though all competitors support it.
Für wen: New parents tracking feeds and sleep for a baby on their own
Platz 81. Wert aus Rezensionen: 31 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 78.887 Bewertungen
31von 100
An intermittent fasting timer with a basic food diary that charges up to 39 dollars a month for functionality available in dozens of free alternatives. Masses of reviews describe being unable to cancel the subscription and charges continuing after deletion.
Gelobt: Some users value the visual timer with fasting phases and real-time explanation of what is happening in the body.
Kritik: Food entry does not work for most new users: the add-meal button leads only to saving, not to an entry form.
Für wen: People looking for a simple fasting timer who do not plan to subscribe
Platz 82. Wert aus Rezensionen: 31 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 44.935 Bewertungen
31von 100
The app broke trust with its audience: users who had relied on it for free for years found one day that product search was locked behind a subscription. Functionally the tracker was simple and handled the job until that point.
Gelobt: Barcode scanning and food photos in one place are convenient as long as they are accessible.
Kritik: Basic product search unexpectedly moved behind a paywall, making the app useless for existing users.
Für wen: Not recommended at this time due to unstable access terms
Platz 83. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 3.706 Bewertungen
30von 100
The AI coach confuses meals, gives advice 'for tomorrow' about 'yesterday's food,' and recipe serving sizes are absurd (4 chicken breasts per serving). Photo recognition is unstable: green beans get added sugar.
Gelobt: Photo recognition in good lighting works quickly and makes a strong first impression.
Kritik: The AI assistant disappears from an account without warning and support does not respond.
Für wen: People looking for a Noom alternative and willing to tolerate instability for a lower price
Platz 84. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 2.375 Bewertungen
30von 100
A blood sugar and meal tracker with a clean interface, but surrounded by too many reports of unexpected charges and an inability to unsubscribe. The app itself is unstable: goals change on their own.
Gelobt: Quick glucose and food entry in one place helps see patterns throughout the day.
Kritik: Meal plan recipes are out of touch with reality: exotic ingredients that are hard to find.
Für wen: Diabetics who need a simple glucose log without complex analytics
Platz 85. Wert aus Rezensionen: 29 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 42.016 Bewertungen
29von 100
An AI tracker with photo recognition that doubles calories when scanning a barcode, calculates absurd targets (1,200 kcal for someone 183 cm tall and 113 kg), and has no functioning support. There are complaints about unauthorized charges.
Gelobt: Photo food recognition identifies the dish correctly in about 80% of cases, reducing logging effort.
Kritik: The barcode scanner doubles the product's calorie content, making tracking dangerously inaccurate.
Für wen: Not recommended — too many systemic problems with accuracy and support
Platz 86. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 50.468 Bewertungen
28von 100
A product with a non-viable core: dish data diverges from real menus, AI recommends non-existent items, and calories are noticeably understated. Business practices are also problematic — a promised trial period charges money immediately.
Gelobt: The idea of finding the healthiest items on a restaurant menu is useful for frequent diners.
Kritik: The menu database is outdated and the app suggests dishes the restaurant no longer serves.
Für wen: Not recommended for anyone — the product is too rough
Platz 87. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 15.385 Bewertungen
28von 100
Behind a high rating there is almost no real user experience. The few substantive reviews describe functionality as basic, and complaints about paying for any action at all repeat in several languages.
Gelobt: A neat onboarding flow with personalized nutrition goals.
Kritik: Adding any product requires a paid subscription — there is almost no free core.
Für wen: Hard to identify a real audience due to the absence of genuine reviews
Platz 88. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 11.833 Bewertungen
28von 100
Designed for diabetics, but the implementation is weak: AI identifies a dish correctly only half the time, data vanishes without a trace, and getting started requires completing a lengthy questionnaire with personal questions. There is almost no real value for glucose management.
Gelobt: The idea of linking eating to blood sugar levels resonates strongly with those who got to try it.
Kritik: Photo dish recognition fails half the time and arbitrarily inflates protein grams whenever a record is edited.
Für wen: Diabetics willing to tolerate unstable performance in exchange for a specialized focus
Platz 89. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 3.536 Bewertungen
28von 100
The app is positioned as a tracker but in practice is a subscription funnel with aggressive upsells. Recipe filters do not work (a 'no nuts' filter shows almond milk), and the scanner is off by a factor of three on calories.
Gelobt: Notifications and a streak counter help avoid forgetting daily logging.
Kritik: The weekly shopping plan does not consolidate products across multiple days, making the feature useless.
Für wen: People just starting to count calories who do not know better free alternatives exist
Platz 90. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 2.599 Bewertungen
28von 100
The AI macro tracker concept sounds appealing, but the food database is too small and the scanner works intermittently, so almost everything must be entered manually. For a paid app this is unacceptable.
Gelobt: A simple operating principle: the app calculates how much more you can eat.
Kritik: Fractional portions cannot be entered, and macro scaling when multiplying a serving does not work correctly.
Für wen: Beginners who want to start tracking protein and fat for the first time
Platz 91. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 13.977 Bewertungen
22von 100
The app is technically broken for a significant portion of users: login is blocked, data does not save, and developers do not respond to reports. The simple tracking concept is sound, but stability is at a critical level.
Gelobt: A minimal interface without unnecessary screens — logging calories takes a few seconds.
Kritik: The app regularly loses account access, and there is no way to reach support.
Für wen: Not recommended for anyone in its current state
Platz 92. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 9.937 Bewertungen
22von 100
The app works for the first few days, then the camera stops recognizing food, returns 0 calories, and freezes. Scanning the same dish gives a different result three times in a row, and incorrect values cannot be edited.
Gelobt: Several users lost tens of kilograms while the app was stable in the first few weeks.
Kritik: Scanning is unpredictable: the same product gives different calories on every scan, and correcting a wrong value is impossible.
Platz 93. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 2.883 Bewertungen
22von 100
The main feature users pay a subscription for — photo food recognition — works unpredictably: one dish photographed four times gets different calories each time. There is no case for paying for this.
Gelobt: A stylish interface that is immediately clear to a new user.
Kritik: Photo food recognition gives random results and does not allow correctly adjusting the portion weight.
Für wen: Not suitable for anyone in its current state
Platz 94. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 4.106 Bewertungen
18von 100
This is not really a tracker but a single-screen macro calculator that, after you enter your data, prompts you to download a different app. The goal-date prediction feature shows dates one to three years in the past, which is a fundamental product bug.
Gelobt: Macro calculation based on body fat percentage rather than just BMI.
Kritik: The target achievement date consistently shows a date in the past, making the core feature meaningless.
Für wen: Not recommended for anyone in its current state
Platz 95. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,2★ · 2.144 Bewertungen
18von 100
The app has degraded: basic functions are now paywalled, and the food-adding mechanic has become so confusing that users cannot figure it out even after paying for a subscription. It cannot be recommended.
Gelobt: Veterans remember the old version as a simple and fast tracker with no friction.
Kritik: After the rebrand, food cannot be added without a subscription, and the paid version still does not count protein correctly.
Für wen: Not recommended for anyone in its current state
Zu den Bewertungen
Zwei Bewertungen — zwei Quellen
Sie helfen beim Vergleich von Apps, ersetzen aber nicht die Prüfung der eigenen Aufgabe.
Rezensionsbewertung · bis 100
Die gespeicherte Bewertung aus der inApp-Recherche zu den Rezensionstexten. Sie beurteilt die App im Archiv insgesamt, nicht die Zuverlässigkeit einer einzelnen Funktion.
Store-Bewertung · bis 5
Die Bewertung von der App-Seite zum Zeitpunkt der Datenerhebung. Aktuelle Bewertung und Version können abweichen.
In der archivierten Stichprobe dieses Themas: 95 Apps und 29.286 gelesene Rezensionen. Das ist der Gesamtumfang der Recherche, nicht die Zahl der Rezensionen pro App.
Ein Abstand zwischen den Bewertungen beweist keine Manipulation. Das Datum der Berechnung und die vollständige Methodik der Bewertung sind nicht im mobilen Archiv. Vergleich die Aufgabenbeschreibungen und die Originalzitate und prüf die Bedingungen in der aktuellen Version.
