Wert aus Rezensionen: 76 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 294.503 Bewertungen
76von 100
Top pick for rating accuracy: users have trusted it for years and describe specific real-world workflows.
Gelobt
Auto-crop and manual crop with zoom work precisely. Users describe it as perfect for photo-to-PDF and easy to use with great features in daily professional contexts.
Kritik
Email sending broke after one update and never recovered. Folders cannot be sorted manually, so the order is random and becomes a problem with large archives.
Für wen: Field professionals and anyone who scans daily and needs organized document storage.
Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 1.339.911 Bewertungen
72von 100
A time-tested scanner with solid file organization, but export has been glitchy lately.
Gelobt
Users keep coming back year after year for the predictability: shoot, crop, send. The file system handles large archives without losing navigation.
Kritik
Email delivery stopped working for some users after an update and documents don't get through. Auto-capture mode requires manual confirmation for each page, slowing down multi-page scans.
Für wen: People who store documents inside the app and occasionally send them by email or to the cloud.
Platz 4. Wert aus Rezensionen: 67 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 331.270 Bewertungen
67von 100
A reliable professional scanner with a great quality-to-file-size balance, but stability dropped after recent updates.
Gelobt: Users highlight speed and clarity as the main draw: 'unbelievable speed and clarity.' The balance between image quality and file size is a rare strength that experienced users notice.
Kritik: After the latest update the app crashes regularly when shooting two pages back to back. Dropbox and Google Drive sync stopped working for some users.
Für wen: Professionals who need sharp scans with file size control and reliable cloud export.
Platz 5. Wert aus Rezensionen: 66 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 50.121 Bewertungen
66von 100
A feature-rich PDF toolkit with a wide range of operations but a rough UX in complex workflows.
Gelobt: Compression, merging, splitting, and JPG conversion all in one app. Users say it replaces Acrobat for everyday tasks.
Kritik: Every action exports a new file to a new folder, so you can't chain multiple operations in sequence. The app crashes without auto-save, which means all work is lost.
Für wen: People who work with PDFs regularly and need a wide range of operations without Adobe.
Platz 6. Wert aus Rezensionen: 65 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 100.037 Bewertungen
65von 100
A fast and convenient scanner with built-in fax, but unreliable email delivery undermines trust.
Gelobt: Flattens crumpled receipts and sends a PDF right away without extra steps. Users appreciate the speed and folder organization.
Kritik: Emails with scanned documents can take hours or never arrive at all. Documents don't sync to the cloud and disappear when the app is reinstalled.
Für wen: Field workers and freelancers who need to quickly send a document or receipt without a scanner nearby.
Platz 8. Wert aus Rezensionen: 63 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 1.563.013 Bewertungen
63von 100
Strong OCR and auto-crop, but export became confusing and unstable after updates.
Gelobt: Page auto-crop is accurate: users describe a 'perfect scan' with no manual corner adjustment. Integrates with Adobe cloud without extra steps.
Kritik: The save button disappeared in one update and people can't figure out how to download a PDF locally. Some users lose pages when exporting multi-page documents.
Für wen: Office workers in the Adobe ecosystem who need precise cropping.
Platz 9. Wert aus Rezensionen: 63 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 215.507 Bewertungen
63von 100
A mature PDF editor with solid annotation tools, but it broke user trust by revoking already-paid features.
Gelobt: Precise text alignment with snap guides when adding text. Annotation for academic work with Apple Pencil. Users from 2017-2018 praise stability and speed under the old model.
Kritik: The company revoked features from users who had paid for a lifetime license. PDF tabs close when switching between apps, and some articles fail to load fully.
Für wen: Those willing to subscribe who need a professional editor for annotation on iPad.
Platz 11. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 177.383 Bewertungen
62von 100
A veteran scanner that got ruined by updates and a subscription paywall.
Gelobt: '10 documents in a minute.' People have kept it for years for its reliability and simplicity of the basic flow.
Kritik: Every major update complicates the interface instead of simplifying it. The subscription wall blocks document sending, which is the only reason people open the app.
Für wen: Anyone who scans occasionally and wants the fewest steps from button to PDF in their inbox.
Platz 12. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 19.306 Bewertungen
62von 100
The proven ABBYY OCR engine in a mobile wrapper, with degradation since switching to a subscription model.
Gelobt: Voice recognition is accurate. Long-term users trust the scan and OCR quality for professional documents including invoices and legal papers.
Kritik: After recent updates, OCR adds phantom text. Auto-capture scans the same page multiple times. The output format silently changed from PDF to JPEG.
Für wen: Professionals with heavy document volumes who are willing to pay a subscription and can accept instability in new versions.
Platz 13. Wert aus Rezensionen: 61 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.386.049 Bewertungen
61von 100
A functional scanner with good recognition, but recent updates broke stability.
Gelobt: Supports drag-and-drop for photos and documents directly into the app. The basic path of scanning receipts daily and emailing them works without extra steps.
Kritik: When editing, color documents get converted to black and white, which breaks scanning of artwork and color forms. The trash folder in new versions freezes when you try to empty it.
Für wen: People who scan receipts and documents regularly and want to store them in organized folders.
Platz 14. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 21.178 Bewertungen
60von 100
A proven scanner with a good track record, but auto-capture is degrading in recent versions.
Gelobt: Cloud storage connections and fast scanning on the phone. Users keep the app for years for its reliable core cycle: shoot, save, send.
Kritik: Auto-capture has become finicky: it says 'get closer' when the document already fills the screen. In recent updates the feature only works under ideal lighting conditions.
Für wen: People who scan documents on the go regularly and want cloud sync.
Platz 15. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 17.166 Bewertungen
60von 100
One of the oldest mobile scanners with a solid user base, but email integration is broken and the paywall is aggressive.
Gelobt: Document recognition and scan quality have been consistent for years. Works as a reliable tool in the field and while traveling.
Kritik: The email send button does not work in the current version. Flash removes shadows unevenly and the final scan is sometimes darker than the original.
Für wen: Users who need an offline scan without sending, or longtime users who haven't updated.
Platz 17. Wert aus Rezensionen: 56 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 39.027 Bewertungen
56von 100
Once a reliable scanner with solid photo processing, now degraded after the camera engine changed in newer versions.
Gelobt: Batch scanning into a single PDF and sharing via Gmail. Long-term users describe it as a precise tool for receipts and multi-page documents.
Kritik: After a forced switch to the ultrawide lens, small text on receipts became unreadable. The frame border in new versions crops the useful scan area.
Für wen: People who scan standard documents and receipts regularly, on older versions of the app.
Platz 18. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 369.738 Bewertungen
55von 100
A mobile fax app with a clean interface but unreliable delivery.
Gelobt: The built-in document scanner works well. The automatic cover letter looks professional and saves time.
Kritik: Fax delivery is unreliable: multiple users waited 2-3 minutes per page and the fax never went through. The sending mechanism is not stable enough for critical documents.
Für wen: People who send a fax occasionally and can accept some unreliability.
Platz 19. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 241.521 Bewertungen
55von 100
A simple workhorse scanner that handled daily tasks well, but auto-capture has become too aggressive.
Gelobt: For office routine it works without extra steps: shoot, get a PDF, send. Long-term users describe it as a lifesaver for document work.
Kritik: After an update, auto-capture fires too fast and doesn't let you adjust the angle before it locks in. Pages look less sharp after manual correction, according to recipients.
Für wen: Staff members who need to send a few pages quickly and don't need precise frame control.
Platz 20. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 67.384 Bewertungen
55von 100
A fast photo-to-PDF converter with a friendly interface, but fragile: all files are stored locally and lost when you delete the app.
Gelobt: '40 minutes with other apps, 40 seconds with this one.' The core scanning engine gets praise for clean output.
Kritik: Auto-alignment distorts documents with curled corners, stretching them to an unreadable size. All files live locally and vanish completely when the app is deleted.
Für wen: Students and one-off tasks. Not suited for anyone storing important documents long-term.
Platz 21. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 30.122 Bewertungen
55von 100
A veteran scanning app with a long-term user base, but support has been declining and it has issues on iPhone 14 Pro.
Gelobt: Simple scanning flow and a wide range of export options. Lawyers and field workers use it to scan documents on-site without extra equipment.
Kritik: Documents are lost after a phone switch and support doesn't respond. Autofocus is broken on iPhone 14 Pro due to the wide-angle camera and the developer hasn't updated the app.
Für wen: Experienced users on older devices who are tied to their document history in the app.
Platz 22. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 17.445 Bewertungen
55von 100
A simple scanner with basic quality, ruined by broken email export and inappropriate ads.
Gelobt: Detects documents from as far as 1.5 meters away. Long-term users appreciate the simplicity and speed of basic scanning.
Kritik: Email sending is systematically broken: documents get stuck in the outbox or never reach the recipient. Ads inside a work app are a problem for professional use.
Für wen: Casual users with infrequent needs who don't need email sending.
Platz 23. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.832.271 Bewertungen
52von 100
A market veteran that degraded from a convenient scanner into an aggressive subscription funnel.
Gelobt: Previously valued for scanning speed and easy document sending without extra steps. Scan quality itself was described as good enough for work tasks.
Kritik: Core features like PDF compression and watermark removal are locked behind a subscription that users discover only after shooting. Full-screen ads appear even for paying users.
Für wen: People who scan a single page once in a while and don't care about quality.
Platz 24. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 53.840 Bewertungen
52von 100
A standard mobile scanner that handles one-off tasks but is unreliable under regular use.
Gelobt: Automatically straightens a page when the phone is held at an angle. One user used it for university admission transcripts and was satisfied with the result.
Kritik: Scan quality is inconsistent and depends on lighting and the angle the phone is held. The built-in eraser tool charges separately for each action.
Für wen: People who scan occasionally and don't rely on consistent OCR quality.
Platz 25. Wert aus Rezensionen: 51 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 9.155 Bewertungen
51von 100
An OCR scanner with strong printed-text recognition and weak handwriting recognition.
Gelobt: Printed text from photos converts accurately and quickly. Users describe real work scenarios: text from books, work documents, contact sheets.
Kritik: Handwritten text recognition produces errors and is worse than iOS built-in OCR. No batch upload: each image must be added one at a time, which kills productivity at high volume.
Für wen: People converting printed documents to text. Not suitable for handwriting.
Platz 26. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 18.948 Bewertungen
48von 100
The former Scanbot with strong auto-crop and cloud sync, ruined by aggressive monetization junk after the ownership change.
Gelobt: Auto-crop works precisely and filters improve readability. Automatic upload to cloud storage (iCloud, OneDrive) is the key feature for regular users.
Kritik: Crashes increased after the ownership change (formerly ScanBot). Scan quality has degraded according to long-term users. Intrusive notifications with AI upsells and occasional double charges through pop-up upgrades.
Für wen: Users who need automatic cloud sync for scans without manual export.
Platz 27. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 25.105 Bewertungen
44von 100
A basic PDF editor for one-off form filling, an Adobe alternative without deep editing.
Gelobt: Quickly handles form filling without an Adobe subscription. The interface is simpler than professional editors.
Kritik: Color images get converted to black and white during editing. Document formatting is not retained on re-open as the app doesn't recognize its own markup.
Für wen: People who fill a form once a month and don't want to pay for Adobe.
Platz 28. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 616.637 Bewertungen
42von 100
A file manager that was good years ago and has degraded into an aggressive subscription model.
Gelobt: The built-in browser and music player kept people using the app for years. It worked as an iTunes replacement without constant pop-ups.
Kritik: Files are hard to find after saving and folder navigation is confusing. Several users report the app stopped opening entirely, locking them out of their saved files.
Für wen: People looking for a file manager with a browser, not a document scanner.
Platz 29. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 19.005 Bewertungen
42von 100
A feature-rich scanner with a broad toolset that breaks in edge-case scenarios.
Gelobt: Extensive set of tools for photo and PDF work. Simple tasks like scan and save are fast and reliable.
Kritik: AI editing is unpredictable: it can delete all matching elements instead of just the one you selected. After updates, auto-scan stops saving the crop.
Für wen: Users with varied photo and document tasks who don't need AI editing.
Platz 31. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 628.917 Bewertungen
38von 100
A PDF editor with powerful capabilities, but the interface is cluttered with AI features and annotations disappear.
Gelobt: Paid subscribers value PDF markup and form work on desktop. Basic PDF reading and document navigation are stable.
Kritik: Markup (annotations) disappears on reopen for about half of users. Exporting a PDF with markup takes too many steps and often doesn't work as expected.
Für wen: People already in the Adobe ecosystem who work with PDF forms on desktop and use mobile as a fallback.
Platz 33. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 24.593 Bewertungen
38von 100
A technically functional scanner with filters and batch shooting up to 30 pages, locked down by a paywall for any export.
Gelobt: Lets you scan up to 30 pages at once with filters to improve readability. PDF conversion is fast.
Kritik: After scanning, any action with the file, export, sending, or printing, requires a subscription. Users who tap 'move document' get a rating prompt instead of the action.
Für wen: Anyone ready to subscribe right away and needs batch scanning.
Platz 38. Wert aus Rezensionen: 32 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 31.104 Bewertungen
32von 100
A scanner with an aggressive subscription and weak OCR for handwritten text.
Gelobt: Converts document photos to PDF quickly, the interface is simple. A few users note its convenience for storing standard paper documents.
Kritik: OCR struggles with handwriting according to the users' own five-star reviews. No direct PDF-to-email: you have to save to cloud and send from there.
Für wen: Occasional users with simple printed documents who don't mind handling export manually.
Platz 39. Wert aus Rezensionen: 31 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 418.017 Bewertungen
31von 100
A scanner that destroyed itself by tying everything to Evernote and putting a hard paywall on basic export.
Gelobt: Previously: fast scan and instant send to Evernote without extra steps. The image quality at capture is described as good.
Kritik: The app constantly signs out of Evernote and re-login takes multiple attempts. Saving a scan to Camera Roll or sending it directly without Evernote is now paid.
Für wen: No one in its current state. Historically, Evernote Premium users.
Platz 40. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 24.168 Bewertungen
30von 100
A scanner with a collapsing ecosystem: paying users are losing export features one by one.
Gelobt: In basic scenarios, converts photos to PDF quickly. Some note its convenience for work documentation.
Kritik: Paying users lose features over time: the email button stopped working, Dropbox disconnected, and Google Drive blocked access due to an unverified integration. OCR produced unreadable output on a current iPhone.
Für wen: Not recommended for active users due to the risk of losing access to features after paying.
Platz 41. Wert aus Rezensionen: 29 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 220.869 Bewertungen
29von 100
Gelobt: Conversion gives a document that 'looks professional rather than like a photo,' which students value for submitting assignments.
Kritik: Image quality is described by users as worse than the built-in camera. After each button tap there are several screens of ad pop-ups that block the workflow.
Für wen: No one except those who want to convert one page for free once a month and can tolerate constant ads.
Platz 42. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 32.398 Bewertungen
28von 100
An image-to-PDF converter with aggressive monetization and an unreliable subscription cancellation mechanism.
Gelobt: Basic screenshot-to-PDF conversion works quickly without extra steps. The task completes in a trial.
Kritik: The subscription keeps charging after cancellation and there is no cancel button in the interface. One user wrote directly that the conversion is 'fake' and doesn't work.
Für wen: No one for regular use. At most a one-off conversion in the free trial with immediate cancellation.
Platz 44. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 26.234 Bewertungen
28von 100
A scanner with minimal image processing quality and an aggressive paywall that hits right after scanning.
Gelobt: Quickly makes a PDF from a photo, useful for students digitizing handwritten work in basic scenarios.
Kritik: Scan quality is low: the result looks like a screenshot, not a processed scan. After shooting, the paywall blocks any action with the file. You can't send or print it.
Für wen: Users who need a one-off PDF without quality requirements and are ready to pay immediately.
Platz 46. Wert aus Rezensionen: 25 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 10.335 Bewertungen
25von 100
A PDF editor with a broken drawing tool and text fields that shift when you type.
Gelobt: Previously worked as a free annotation tool for students. Signature is auto-generated.
Kritik: The drawing tool places objects an inch away from where you tapped. Text in fields disappears or shifts during editing. Everything useful is locked behind a subscription.
Für wen: Not recommended to anyone in its current state.
Platz 48. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 27.656 Bewertungen
22von 100
A PDF editor with minimal real functionality and aggressive monetization.
Gelobt: Basic document creation works for very simple tasks. Folder support is present.
Kritik: You can't move an edited file to a folder. Real PDF editing is limited and most users can't change what they need. The interface got worse after an update.
Platz 49. Wert aus Rezensionen: 20 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 20.230 Bewertungen
20von 100
Gelobt: Historically worked as a basic scanner where users watched ads instead of paying. That era is remembered fondly.
Kritik: Crashes on current devices. Color scanning (passports) produces blurry output. Features that attracted loyal users were removed after the subscription switch.
Platz 51. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 26.429 Bewertungen
18von 100
A wrapper app with no real OCR: it just photographs a document and saves it as a PDF.
Gelobt: Quickly makes a PDF from a photo in one tap for the simplest cases.
Kritik: Does not deliver on its stated features: no real scanning, no OCR, signatures can't be resized. You can only add photos one at a time, not select multiple at once.
Platz 52. Wert aus Rezensionen: 12 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 10.670 Bewertungen
12von 100
A low-functionality scanner with an opaque trial that leads users to unexpected charges.
Gelobt: One reviewer notes the simplicity of the interface. Basic scanning works for single documents.
Kritik: After a three-day trial, charges are applied automatically with no obvious cancellation path. Scan quality is compared to the built-in Notes.app and comes out worse.
Für wen: Not recommended.
Zu den Bewertungen
Zwei Bewertungen — zwei Quellen
Sie helfen beim Vergleich von Apps, ersetzen aber nicht die Prüfung der eigenen Aufgabe.
Rezensionsbewertung · bis 100
Die gespeicherte Bewertung aus der inApp-Recherche zu den Rezensionstexten. Sie beurteilt die App im Archiv insgesamt, nicht die Zuverlässigkeit einer einzelnen Funktion.
Store-Bewertung · bis 5
Die Bewertung von der App-Seite zum Zeitpunkt der Datenerhebung. Aktuelle Bewertung und Version können abweichen.
In der archivierten Stichprobe dieses Themas: 52 Apps und 22.040 gelesene Rezensionen. Das ist der Gesamtumfang der Recherche, nicht die Zahl der Rezensionen pro App.
Ein Abstand zwischen den Bewertungen beweist keine Manipulation. Das Datum der Berechnung und die vollständige Methodik der Bewertung sind nicht im mobilen Archiv. Vergleich die Aufgabenbeschreibungen und die Originalzitate und prüf die Bedingungen in der aktuellen Version.
