Authors ask for a weight change to carry over to the other sets and for the timer to be kept. These actions need to be tested in the middle of a session.
Welche Apps genutzt werden
Diese Apps werden in der Analyse dieser Aufgabe genannt. Öffne jede, um Stärken und Grenzen zu vergleichen. Die Reihenfolge der Liste ist keine Rangliste der Eignung.
Platz 2. Wert aus Rezensionen: 79 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 77.017 Bewertungen
79von 100
One of the best gym loggers available: a massive exercise library, program folders, set history, and a solid web interface for planning. Apple Watch sync works roughly half the time.
Gelobt: Program folders and instant set history give a real sense of progress without extra taps.
Kritik: Changing the weight on the first set does not automatically update the rest, which breaks flow mid-workout.
Für wen: Gym regulars who care about accurate weight logging and tracking exercise progression.
Platz 9. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 9.292 Bewertungen
68von 100
Boostcamp stands out with a library of real programs from recognized coaches, progressive overload built in, and a solid workout log, making it a strong gym tool. Recent updates degraded the timer and cluttered the interface, but the product core remains strong.
Gelobt: A catalog of ready programs from real coaches with automatic weight progression from session to session.
Kritik: The timer resets when the app is backgrounded, making rest periods between sets awkward to manage.
Für wen: Gym athletes who want proven programs with built-in progression and no need to write their own plans.
Platz 8. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 12.665 Bewertungen
68von 100
One of the best free set-and-rep trackers with progression history and Dynamic Island support. Clean and fast in daily use, though the exercise library is small and volume analytics are limited.
Gelobt: Simple fast data entry during a workout and per-exercise progress history.
Kritik: The exercise library is limited, many machine movements are missing, and progress charts lack point-level detail.
Für wen: Strength athletes who want a minimal tracker without extras.
Platz 7. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 32.554 Bewertungen
68von 100
Strongest in logging and Apple Watch Ultra integration: quick to create a workout, easy to adjust on the fly, and minimal phone checking needed. Weaker on motivation and weight recommendations for beginners.
Gelobt: Deep Apple Watch integration combined with simple creation and editing of custom programs.
Kritik: Supersets are not intuitive and do not switch automatically, and there are no weight recommendations for beginners.
Für wen: Experienced Apple Watch users who know what they are doing and want a convenient training log.
Platz 14. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 10.455 Bewertungen
62von 100
Fitlist handles strength training logging well: custom exercises, a weight and set progression log, and superset support. A recent major update degraded navigation and broke the auto-cycle for supersets, frustrating loyal users.
Gelobt: A flexible workout builder with weight and set history for every exercise across all past sessions.
Kritik: After the last update, supersets no longer automatically cycle back to the first exercise, and search became less accurate.
Für wen: Gym athletes who need an accurate set and weight log with progression history.