Authors ask for a weight change to carry over to the other sets and for the timer to be kept. These actions need to be tested in the middle of a session.
Quelles apps les gens utilisent
Ces apps sont mentionnées dans le décryptage de cette tâche. Ouvre chacune pour comparer les points forts et les limites. L’ordre de la liste n’est pas un classement d’adéquation.
Rang 2. Note des avis : 79 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 77 017 notes
79sur 100
One of the best gym loggers available: a massive exercise library, program folders, set history, and a solid web interface for planning. Apple Watch sync works roughly half the time.
Points forts : Program folders and instant set history give a real sense of progress without extra taps.
Reproches : Changing the weight on the first set does not automatically update the rest, which breaks flow mid-workout.
Pour qui : Gym regulars who care about accurate weight logging and tracking exercise progression.
Rang 9. Note des avis : 68 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 9 292 notes
68sur 100
Boostcamp stands out with a library of real programs from recognized coaches, progressive overload built in, and a solid workout log, making it a strong gym tool. Recent updates degraded the timer and cluttered the interface, but the product core remains strong.
Points forts : A catalog of ready programs from real coaches with automatic weight progression from session to session.
Reproches : The timer resets when the app is backgrounded, making rest periods between sets awkward to manage.
Pour qui : Gym athletes who want proven programs with built-in progression and no need to write their own plans.
Rang 8. Note des avis : 68 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 12 665 notes
68sur 100
One of the best free set-and-rep trackers with progression history and Dynamic Island support. Clean and fast in daily use, though the exercise library is small and volume analytics are limited.
Points forts : Simple fast data entry during a workout and per-exercise progress history.
Reproches : The exercise library is limited, many machine movements are missing, and progress charts lack point-level detail.
Pour qui : Strength athletes who want a minimal tracker without extras.
Rang 7. Note des avis : 68 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 32 554 notes
68sur 100
Strongest in logging and Apple Watch Ultra integration: quick to create a workout, easy to adjust on the fly, and minimal phone checking needed. Weaker on motivation and weight recommendations for beginners.
Points forts : Deep Apple Watch integration combined with simple creation and editing of custom programs.
Reproches : Supersets are not intuitive and do not switch automatically, and there are no weight recommendations for beginners.
Pour qui : Experienced Apple Watch users who know what they are doing and want a convenient training log.
Rang 14. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 10 455 notes
62sur 100
Fitlist handles strength training logging well: custom exercises, a weight and set progression log, and superset support. A recent major update degraded navigation and broke the auto-cycle for supersets, frustrating loyal users.
Points forts : A flexible workout builder with weight and set history for every exercise across all past sessions.
Reproches : After the last update, supersets no longer automatically cycle back to the first exercise, and search became less accurate.
Pour qui : Gym athletes who need an accurate set and weight log with progression history.
