Wert aus Rezensionen: 81 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 155.583 Bewertungen
81von 100
Based on user descriptions, the app offers structured strength and cardio programs with live coaches, nutrition tracking, and equipment flexibility. Real quality is hard to assess due to a suspicious rating distribution.
Gelobt
Live coach programs, nutrition integration, and equipment adaptability working together in one place.
Kritik
Higher membership tiers are effectively unsupported even though they are still being sold.
Für wen: People who want to train at home or in the gym under coach guidance with nutrition tracking.
Wert aus Rezensionen: 79 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 77.017 Bewertungen
79von 100
One of the best gym loggers available: a massive exercise library, program folders, set history, and a solid web interface for planning. Apple Watch sync works roughly half the time.
Gelobt
Program folders and instant set history give a real sense of progress without extra taps.
Kritik
Changing the weight on the first set does not automatically update the rest, which breaks flow mid-workout.
Für wen: Gym regulars who care about accurate weight logging and tracking exercise progression.
Wert aus Rezensionen: 74 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 43.003 Bewertungen
74von 100
Structured programs with exercise substitutions and a weekly planner keep women on track with their training. The biggest gaps are weight history and the lack of cross-program planning.
Gelobt
Ready-made programs with weekly schedules that do not require any planning on your part.
Kritik
Weight history cannot be viewed outside of an active workout, and bodyweight exercise progress is not tracked.
Für wen: Women who want a ready-made program without writing their own training plan.
Platz 4. Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 297.445 Bewertungen
72von 100
A vast library of structured home programs (P90X, Insanity, 21 Day Fix) with live coaches and clear weekly progression. The content is proven and built to last years, but the technical side is rough: Chromecast is unstable and audio sometimes drifts from video.
Gelobt: Dozens of complete multi-week programs with well-designed progressive overload and professional coaches, making home training genuinely structured.
Kritik: Casting to a TV via Chromecast is unreliable, and audio goes out of sync with video after updates without a fix on restart.
Für wen: Anyone who wants a structured home program without going to a gym.
Platz 5. Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 93.490 Bewertungen
72von 100
The best free micronutrient tracker on the market: detailed nutritional breakdowns, a barcode scanner, and flexible configuration. A recent food search update significantly disrupted the daily logging flow.
Gelobt: The depth of nutrient tracking is unmatched by competitors: vitamins, minerals, and amino acids all in one place.
Kritik: After the update, food search no longer ranks frequent items first, requiring extra scrolling every time.
Für wen: People who track micronutrients and macronutrient composition seriously.
Platz 6. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 43.973 Bewertungen
68von 100
Structured programs with video instruction for every exercise, warm-up and cool-down built in, and a per-set rep tracker make this one of the best options for women training in the gym. That said, all programs feel similar in style and get repetitive after a few months.
Gelobt: Short video clips for every exercise plus built-in warm-ups create the feeling of having a personal trainer right there.
Kritik: Different coaches in the app offer nearly identical plans, so there is effectively no real choice of training style.
Für wen: Women training at the gym who want a structured program.
Platz 7. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 32.554 Bewertungen
68von 100
Strongest in logging and Apple Watch Ultra integration: quick to create a workout, easy to adjust on the fly, and minimal phone checking needed. Weaker on motivation and weight recommendations for beginners.
Gelobt: Deep Apple Watch integration combined with simple creation and editing of custom programs.
Kritik: Supersets are not intuitive and do not switch automatically, and there are no weight recommendations for beginners.
Für wen: Experienced Apple Watch users who know what they are doing and want a convenient training log.
Platz 8. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 12.665 Bewertungen
68von 100
One of the best free set-and-rep trackers with progression history and Dynamic Island support. Clean and fast in daily use, though the exercise library is small and volume analytics are limited.
Gelobt: Simple fast data entry during a workout and per-exercise progress history.
Kritik: The exercise library is limited, many machine movements are missing, and progress charts lack point-level detail.
Für wen: Strength athletes who want a minimal tracker without extras.
Platz 9. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 9.292 Bewertungen
68von 100
Boostcamp stands out with a library of real programs from recognized coaches, progressive overload built in, and a solid workout log, making it a strong gym tool. Recent updates degraded the timer and cluttered the interface, but the product core remains strong.
Gelobt: A catalog of ready programs from real coaches with automatic weight progression from session to session.
Kritik: The timer resets when the app is backgrounded, making rest periods between sets awkward to manage.
Für wen: Gym athletes who want proven programs with built-in progression and no need to write their own plans.
Platz 10. Wert aus Rezensionen: 66 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 164.092 Bewertungen
66von 100
A strong platform for gym-based strength training with video demonstrations and customizable programs. Weight progression is designed without accounting for daily context and fatigue, leading to inaccurate recommendations.
Gelobt: Video and text instructions for every exercise plus the ability to adjust the program to available equipment.
Kritik: The progression system does not account for the difference between the first set of the day and the third set of the week's third session.
Für wen: Gym users who want a structured ready-made plan without writing one themselves.
Platz 11. Wert aus Rezensionen: 63 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 21.085 Bewertungen
63von 100
A wide variety of programs with real coaches covering strength, cardio, and recovery together. The platform is technically unstable: it logs people out regularly and fails to save completed workouts, undermining any sense of progress.
Gelobt: The variety of coaches and training styles makes it possible to find the approach that actually keeps you motivated.
Kritik: No personalized progression: the app does not track strength gains or adjust load from week to week.
Für wen: People who want live-coach workouts across a range of formats.
Platz 12. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 812.143 Bewertungen
62von 100
A strong library of live classes and programs covering cycling, strength, and meditation with real instructors and a genuine community feel. The technical side falls short: Apple Watch crashes on launch, bike sync drops mid-ride, and class search and filtering are frustrating on phone.
Gelobt: A vast library of formats and instructors keeps motivation going for years, and the competitive atmosphere in live rides feels real.
Kritik: Sync between phone, bike, and Apple Watch is unreliable, the program filter does not work, and a bug makes class stacks impossible to reorder.
Für wen: Peloton bike owners or people paying for a full subscription.
Platz 13. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 282.744 Bewertungen
62von 100
A large library of video workouts with live coaches, well suited for home training without equipment. Post-workout navigation and the absence of an exercise list before starting a video noticeably hurt the experience.
Gelobt: Wide selection of formats from 5 to 45 minutes with real coaches and a positive atmosphere.
Kritik: No preview of exercises inside a video before it starts, which matters for people with physical limitations.
Für wen: Home workouts without equipment, especially for busy people and beginners.
Platz 14. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 10.455 Bewertungen
62von 100
Fitlist handles strength training logging well: custom exercises, a weight and set progression log, and superset support. A recent major update degraded navigation and broke the auto-cycle for supersets, frustrating loyal users.
Gelobt: A flexible workout builder with weight and set history for every exercise across all past sessions.
Kritik: After the last update, supersets no longer automatically cycle back to the first exercise, and search became less accurate.
Für wen: Gym athletes who need an accurate set and weight log with progression history.
Platz 15. Wert aus Rezensionen: 61 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 16.646 Bewertungen
61von 100
A solid strength platform with AI-generated plans, rest timers, and a good movement library. Development has stalled for a year, Apple Watch sync has errors, and custom workouts disappear when switching between apps.
Gelobt: Automatic workout plan creation by training split removes the need to program sessions yourself.
Kritik: No new programs have been added in over a year, and repeated exercises within one plan start to feel stale after a few months.
Für wen: People training with a barbell and dumbbells who already pay for Peloton.
Platz 16. Wert aus Rezensionen: 61 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 15.903 Bewertungen
61von 100
The AI trainer adapts the program to injuries and fitness level, which sets this app apart, but frequent nutrition freezes and session instability substantially reduce its usefulness.
Gelobt: The AI accounts for injury limitations and rebuilds the training plan around them automatically.
Kritik: No smartwatch support, the app must stay open throughout the entire session, and the gym exercise library is incomplete.
Platz 17. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 375.473 Bewertungen
60von 100
One of the oldest running trackers: clean interface, flexible activity history, and a unique shoe mileage tracking feature. The transition to ASICS ownership introduced sync issues with Apple Watch, and some users lost years of historical data.
Gelobt: Run filtering by distance and time works better than competitors, and shoe wear tracking is a rare and genuinely useful feature.
Kritik: After updates, Apple Watch sync breaks periodically, saving a workout requires extra taps, and some users lost their archives during the ASICS migration.
Für wen: Runners who care about their run history and tracking shoe wear.
Platz 18. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 76.367 Bewertungen
60von 100
Best-in-class app for the Stronglifts 5x5 protocol: automatic weight progression, a clean interface, and focus on one methodology without clutter. However, there is only one program and initial increments cannot be customized.
Gelobt: Automatic weight increases from workout to workout according to program rules remove all decisions from the user.
Kritik: A single program and no exercise variety make the app useless beyond the base protocol.
Für wen: Beginner and intermediate lifters following the Stronglifts 5x5 program strictly.
Platz 19. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 46.702 Bewertungen
60von 100
One of the most detailed strength training trackers: a large exercise library, Apple Watch sync, and weight-increase suggestions all work well, but aggressive UI updates regularly break familiar workflows.
Gelobt: Weight increase suggestions based on set history actually help users avoid getting stuck at the same level.
Kritik: New interface updates hide needed data right during a workout, making it harder to focus on the exercise.
Für wen: Regular gym-goers who need detailed progress analytics.
Platz 20. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 40.380 Bewertungen
60von 100
A solid exercise rotation base and voice announcement of the next movement are genuine gym advantages, but the AI assistant ignores equipment preferences poorly, and supersets combining a barbell with a cable in one round are unrealistic in a busy gym.
Gelobt: Voice announcement of the next exercise and last working weight without looking at the screen.
Kritik: The AI coach does not retain equipment preference changes and creates supersets out of stations on opposite sides of the gym.
Für wen: People who want structured rotation without writing their own programs.
Platz 21. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 14.085 Bewertungen
60von 100
Does its job well: video instructions, countdown timer, the ability to queue multiple sets in a row without extra steps. Ideal for short home workouts.
Gelobt: Start and train, nothing extra. Instructions are clear and multiple workouts can be queued up.
Kritik: No Apple Watch support, custom workouts do not sync between devices, and the pause feature is awkward.
Für wen: Busy people who need short home workouts.
Platz 22. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 103.945 Bewertungen
58von 100
A simple run and walk tracker with a GPS route map, target distance, and basic stats. GPS accuracy is inconsistent, progress is lost on reinstall, and there is no profile sync across devices.
Gelobt: Route map and real-time distance without unnecessary complexity for daily walks and runs.
Kritik: Progress is not tied to an account and is completely lost on reinstall or device change.
Für wen: Casual walkers and runners who need a simple GPS tracker without extra features.
Platz 23. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 30.699 Bewertungen
58von 100
The AI trainer adapts load to available equipment and helps beginners get into strength training, but the equipment catalog is thin, calves fall out of the program, and plans start repeating over time.
Gelobt: AI chat with a trainer that explains technique in real time and adjusts the program.
Kritik: The equipment catalog is too narrow, calves drop out of leg day plans, and exercise variety runs out over time.
Für wen: Strength training beginners who need a starting plan without a gym.
Platz 24. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 6.782 Bewertungen
58von 100
Strong content from a real coaching duo with an extensive video library and no-equipment options, but the app is technically rough: freezes, TV streaming issues, and inaccurate timers frustrate regular users.
Gelobt: Live workouts from Coach Kozak and Claudia with form cues and modifications for different fitness levels.
Kritik: Search and filtering are inconsistent, the no-equipment mode is not respected, and strength programs for older adults are nearly absent.
Für wen: Home workouts without a gym or personal trainer.
Platz 25. Wert aus Rezensionen: 57 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 30.369 Bewertungen
57von 100
A wide range of formats from stretching to cardio and strength, well suited for corporate wellness programs. Apple Health and Watch sync breaks, plan progress resets, and the exercise structure in individual workouts is weak.
Gelobt: Wide selection of short workouts across different types that fit easily into a work day.
Kritik: No real progressive overload system or personalization to fitness level.
Für wen: Office workers who need short movement breaks as part of a corporate wellness program.
Platz 26. Wert aus Rezensionen: 56 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 33.571 Bewertungen
56von 100
A marketplace of real coaches with solid content for those who have found their coach. Videos buffer frequently, the app structure disorients newcomers, and there is no quality control across different coaches' content.
Gelobt: Specific coaches with methodically built programs who carry real accountability for quality.
Kritik: Videos regularly freeze mid-exercise, and tapping an instructional clip resets the workout timer.
Für wen: People who have already found their online coach and want to follow that person's program.
Platz 27. Wert aus Rezensionen: 56 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 10.595 Bewertungen
56von 100
Full Fitness has one of the best exercise libraries and a flexible workout builder for experienced athletes, but switching long-time buyers to a subscription without compensation, an outdated interface, and data-saving problems seriously undermine trust in the app.
Gelobt: A deep exercise library with the ability to build custom workouts from scratch without structural constraints.
Kritik: The interface is dated, font and icons are too small for use in the gym, and navigation is awkward.
Für wen: Experienced athletes who need a flexible workout builder with a detailed log.
Platz 28. Wert aus Rezensionen: 56 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 7.127 Bewertungen
56von 100
A strong AI planner for the gym with equipment awareness, detailed exercise instructions, and a voice AI trainer. A series of updates broke the rest timer, weight conversion, and launch stability, undermining a good product core.
Gelobt: AI plan is built around the specific equipment available in your gym, with detailed instructions for every exercise.
Kritik: After updates the rest timer stopped vibrating and sending notifications, which disrupts workout rhythm.
Für wen: Gym-goers who want an AI plan tailored to real equipment without a live trainer.
Platz 29. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 474.148 Bewertungen
55von 100
A reliable GPS tracker for walking, running, and cycling with a convenient route map and activity history. GPS accuracy varies: the same route on different days gives different distances, and at a slow pace the distance inflates noticeably.
Gelobt: The route map after a walk provides visual motivation and allows you to compare familiar paths.
Kritik: GPS is inconsistent: walking speed affects measured distance, and the same road shows a different result every time.
Für wen: Walkers and light outdoor enthusiasts who care about route maps.
Platz 30. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 136.728 Bewertungen
55von 100
Clear timer-and-round mechanics for high-intensity seven-minute bodyweight workouts. The streak and achievement system works as a solid habit-building tool, but program variety is very limited.
Gelobt: The streak system and gamification genuinely help maintain consistency without an external coach.
Kritik: No way to mark a missed day due to injury or illness without losing streak progress.
Für wen: People who want short equipment-free workouts and external motivation through gamification.
Platz 31. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 81.929 Bewertungen
55von 100
Gamification of strength training through ranks and streaks genuinely motivates part of the audience. But the exercise library is narrow, watch sync is absent, and the ranking algorithm breaks down for running.
Gelobt: The ranking and streak system turns the gym into a game and builds the habit better than a plain progress table.
Kritik: Thin exercise library: exotic names are present, common ones are missing, and the food search for nutrition tracking barely works.
Für wen: Gamification fans who find a plain log boring without a competitive element.
Platz 32. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 57.574 Bewertungen
55von 100
Audio workouts with real coaches for running and cardio are well produced and the catalog is broad, but content updates have effectively stopped, which is critical for a subscription product.
Gelobt: Multiple coaches with distinct delivery styles make audio sessions feel alive rather than robotic.
Kritik: Content has not been updated for months: regular users exhaust the running and strength audio catalog.
Für wen: Running and cardio fans who want an audio coach.
Platz 33. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 33.882 Bewertungen
55von 100
A clear step-by-step plan with exercise videos and a long-standing user base works as a basic gym companion. It lacks flexibility for equipment substitutions and has no per-set tracking.
Gelobt: A step-by-step plan with video that removes the need to think about what comes next.
Kritik: Cannot adapt the plan to missing equipment, and per-set tracking is not supported.
Für wen: Gym beginners who need a ready-made plan without extra configuration.
Platz 34. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 22.889 Bewertungen
55von 100
A solid app with a large exercise library and custom workouts that worked well for years. After the 2024 subscription shift, editing custom workouts was removed and old data was locked behind the paywall, hitting the core audience hard.
Gelobt: Exercise library with movement demonstrations and the ability to build custom workouts around specific goals.
Kritik: After the 2024 update, the order of exercises in custom workouts can no longer be rearranged during a session.
Für wen: Experienced users who build their own programs and want a flexible tracker.
Platz 35. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 14.066 Bewertungen
55von 100
A good selection of video home workouts with a personal plan, but the Apple Watch app is unstable and several features behave unpredictably after updates.
Gelobt: Video-guided workouts feel like training with a coach at home.
Kritik: The Apple Watch app crashes repeatedly, social features are non-functional, and videos sometimes fail to load.
Platz 36. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 12.576 Bewertungen
55von 100
Strong heart rate zone visualization and comparison with past workouts suit cardio training, but data appears with a delay and the interface is cluttered, making quick access to key metrics difficult.
Gelobt: Clean cardio summaries with heart rate zones and multi-year comparisons.
Kritik: Workout data can take several hours to appear, and the interface is crowded and hard to read.
Für wen: Cardio athletes who train with a heart rate monitor.
Platz 37. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 2,9★ · 11.110 Bewertungen
55von 100
Apple Fitness integrates well with Watch and Health and offers a wide range of formats from HIIT to Pilates with live trainers, but suffers from fundamental problems: no video scrubbing, activity tracking skips segments, and friend competitions work only intermittently.
Gelobt: Rich selection of workout formats from short 10-minute sessions to long programs with professional trainers.
Kritik: No scrubbing or resume-from-position in video workouts, which is critical for recorded classes.
Für wen: Apple Watch users who want video workouts inside the Apple ecosystem.
Platz 38. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 8.789 Bewertungen
55von 100
The only app in its niche that tracks load and recommends recovery instead of pushing for records. The load algorithm can be overly conservative: it sometimes demands three rest days after a 30-minute walk, which erodes trust in its recommendations.
Gelobt: The philosophy of moving sustainably without burning out genuinely helps people build a lasting habit.
Kritik: The load recommendation algorithm does not work correctly without Apple Watch and overestimates fatigue.
Für wen: Anyone who has burned out on fitness streaks and wants a gentle tracker without pressure to hit records.
Platz 39. Wert aus Rezensionen: 53 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 115.846 Bewertungen
53von 100
Structured bodyweight programs for home use with a weight-loss forecast and plans by muscle group. Without any actual strength or load progress metrics, the app remains a collection of videos rather than a tool for tracking growth.
Gelobt: Equipment-free workouts get done without a gym visit and fit well into a daily routine.
Kritik: No tracking of load or strength progress whatsoever, only a completion checkmark.
Für wen: Beginners with no equipment who need a ready-made home program.
Platz 40. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 123.048 Bewertungen
52von 100
The classic seven-minute HIIT protocol works cleanly and requires no equipment. After the app redesign, custom programs degraded and navigating to the main workout became more steps than before.
Gelobt: Quick classic HIIT protocol without equipment, with Apple Health sync.
Kritik: After the update, custom workouts stopped saving and were buried behind additional steps.
Für wen: People who need a short standard HIIT workout without configuration or extra steps.
Platz 42. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 65.176 Bewertungen
52von 100
Trainerize is strong as a coach-side tool: an organized exercise library, programs, and client communication are well built. But frequent platform crashes and lost set history turn workouts into a gamble.
Gelobt: A coach can upload their programs and hand them to a client immediately without extra explanation.
Kritik: Weight and rep history periodically disappears, which defeats the entire purpose of progressive overload.
Platz 43. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 22.214 Bewertungen
52von 100
One of the few apps with genuine AI load adaptation and a serious bodyweight approach requiring no equipment, but exercises cycle and repeat, and movement variety is limited to the HIIT format.
Gelobt: The AI coach adapts load and genuinely progresses difficulty based on feedback after each workout.
Kritik: Exercises are extremely repetitive: the same movements appear up to ten times in one session without variation.
Für wen: People who train without equipment and want external program structure.
Platz 44. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 16.459 Bewertungen
52von 100
A solid strength tracker with a good exercise database and progression logic, but the AI trainer is rough and glitchy, and the in-workout interface gets in the way with constant pop-ups.
Gelobt: Convenient logging of weights per machine and tracking personal records across several years.
Kritik: The AI program builder glitches when days are skipped, the timer covers input fields, and editing a created workout is awkward.
Für wen: Strength athletes who need a simple digital training log.
Platz 45. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 11.431 Bewertungen
52von 100
Fitify offers varied home workouts with a timer and a decent exercise library, but timer-only workouts without rep counting frustrate advanced users. The AI coach Mike runs erratically and is frequently interrupted by ads.
Gelobt: Clean session structure for beginners: warm-up, main workout, and cool-down flow as one continuous block.
Kritik: No rep-counting mode, only a timer, which does not work for strength training with progressive overload.
Für wen: Beginners who need timer-based home workouts without equipment.
Platz 46. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 7.657 Bewertungen
52von 100
One of the more mature trackers with a large video workout library, a timer, and a coach voice. Recent updates have replaced some content with random YouTube clips instead of original workouts, degrading the quality of the established library.
Gelobt: Massive filterable workout library, and the voice coach during sessions provides real motivation.
Kritik: The workout library is degrading: new content is being replaced by external YouTube videos without quality checks.
Für wen: Experienced users who need a broad library filterable by muscle group and duration.
Platz 47. Wert aus Rezensionen: 50 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 44.029 Bewertungen
50von 100
Simple home workouts by muscle group with a minimal interface work for maintaining basic fitness, but there is no program depth: no progression, no level adaptation, and no way to build custom routines.
Gelobt: A minimalist design and no extra screens let you start a workout in seconds.
Kritik: No load progression: the app does not know whether things got easier and does not increase difficulty.
Für wen: People who need a quick home workout without any configuration.
Platz 48. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 55.623 Bewertungen
48von 100
The app logs workouts and suggests progressive overload with visualization, but the exercise selection algorithm repeats itself and the kettlebell and non-standard movement library is thin.
Gelobt: Visual weight progress and load-increase cues help a beginner avoid stagnation.
Kritik: After several months the plan stops changing: the same 9 to 10 reps and the same exercises on repeat.
Für wen: Gym beginners who need a ready-made program.
Platz 49. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 10.617 Bewertungen
48von 100
Home Workout - Fitness Planner offers personalized plans with an AI coach and a decent exercise library, but progression is too fast for beginners, real-time voice cues are absent, and workout history disappears after updates.
Gelobt: An adaptive plan based on fitness level and goals is created at first launch without extra steps.
Kritik: No verbal form cues in real time, so exercises must be memorized beforehand.
Für wen: Beginners who need a structured home plan without equipment.
Platz 50. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 8.399 Bewertungen
48von 100
Well-chosen exercises for older adults with live instructors and video, but intensity is too low even for the target audience, instructions are not synchronized with the trainer's movements, and the gender filter for coaches does not work as advertised.
Gelobt: Real live trainers instead of animated characters, at a pace that is comfortable for older adults.
Kritik: Voice instructions lag behind on-screen movements, which is confusing during more complex exercises.
Für wen: Adults 60 and older who prioritize movement safety and a simple interface.
Platz 51. Wert aus Rezensionen: 46 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 58.571 Bewertungen
46von 100
A solid structure of home workouts without equipment with a flexible schedule fit, but the movement library is small and there is no progressive overload between weeks.
Gelobt: Workouts fit into any day of the week and require no equipment at all.
Kritik: No progressive overload mechanic: the program does not get harder automatically as fitness improves.
Für wen: Beginners training at home without equipment.
Platz 52. Wert aus Rezensionen: 45 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 134.315 Bewertungen
45von 100
Muscle Booster covers a wide range of formats from strength to tai chi and chair workouts for older and low-mobility users. The home and gym sections were built by different teams without a shared standard: audio cues and weight recommendations are inconsistent between the two.
Gelobt: Chair workouts and tai chi for older users with limited mobility actually deliver results.
Kritik: The home and gym sections operate by different rules: one has audio cues and the other has weight recommendations, and they do not overlap.
Für wen: Older adults and people with limited mobility who need adapted workout formats.
Platz 53. Wert aus Rezensionen: 45 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,2★ · 9.411 Bewertungen
45von 100
StrongHer offers workouts for women with difficulty and duration options, but the program selection is very narrow, new plans are rarely added, and weekly schedule customization by day is not available.
Gelobt: Workouts of varying lengths from 10 minutes let you fit a session into even a packed day.
Kritik: A workout cannot be moved to another day in the schedule, which breaks the plan as soon as anything changes.
Für wen: Women who want structured short strength workouts at home.
Platz 54. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 707.995 Bewertungen
44von 100
Aimed at beginners with a basic no-equipment body program and a built-in food journal. Exercises are short and clear, but difficulty level is not adjustable, technique instructions are thin, and the program algorithm keeps pushing the same muscle groups.
Gelobt: The no-equipment program genuinely works for beginners: short daily routines are easy to fit into any schedule.
Kritik: No real control over the program: the app picks exercises on its own and constantly adds leg work even when other zones are selected.
Für wen: Complete beginners who want to start moving at home from scratch.
Platz 55. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 142.801 Bewertungen
44von 100
An app for the home rehab program prescribed by a physical therapist. The core problem is not the content but the mechanics: exercise timers consistently do not match what the specialist prescribed, and there is no simple way to log completion outside the app.
Gelobt: Video demonstrations help confirm correct technique when performing rehab exercises at home.
Kritik: Exercise timers are not synchronized with therapist prescriptions: a 30-second hold becomes a 5-second timer on screen.
Für wen: Patients on a home rehabilitation program prescribed by a physical therapist.
Platz 56. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 82.058 Bewertungen
44von 100
Once a functional combination of short workouts and meal plans that helped people lose significant weight. The product has stagnated: no updates in two years, some programs removed, and no smartwatch integration.
Gelobt: Short 10 to 20-minute workouts paired with a meal plan work as a unified weight-loss tool.
Kritik: No ability to create custom workouts or recipes, and the program does not adapt to progress once the level cap is reached.
Für wen: Beginners who want a simple combination of short workouts and nutrition guidance without setup.
Platz 57. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 14.928 Bewertungen
44von 100
The app was a convenient tracker with exercise video demonstrations, but development has officially ended: bugs are not fixed and cross-device sync does not work.
Gelobt: Simple custom workout creation and technique video instructions.
Kritik: Development is abandoned: training plans reset, sharing is broken, and cross-device sync does not work.
Für wen: Anyone who does not yet know that support has ended.
Platz 58. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 11.070 Bewertungen
44von 100
Fitplan is built around celebrity coaches and structured plans with video demonstrations, but systematic server outages and the inability to access paid accounts make the product unreliable. Plans are not updated and the library is shrinking.
Gelobt: Plans from real trainers with video for every exercise give the feeling of working with a personal coach.
Kritik: No way to reset and restart a completed plan, which breaks any cyclical approach to the program.
Für wen: Fans of specific fitness trainers willing to tolerate service instability.
Platz 59. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 762.553 Bewertungen
42von 100
A functionally simple calorie counter with a large food database and a working label scanner, but monetization has become the main UX barrier: ads appear after every log entry and the paywall keeps expanding. Workout tracking is barely used.
Gelobt: The food database is detailed, the label scanner is accurate, and the journal helps maintain a deficit and produces real results with consistent use.
Kritik: Ads appear literally after every food entry added, and creating a custom recipe is confusingly complex.
Für wen: People willing to pay who want only calorie counting.
Platz 60. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 28.324 Bewertungen
42von 100
Simple home workouts with step-by-step video, but the program hits a wall at day 3 or 4, after which the value is essentially zero. There is no depth: exercises repeat and progression is weak.
Gelobt: Video demonstration of each exercise helps beginners understand the technique from the first try.
Kritik: The program is structured so that actual training is only possible for the first two days. After that the content is fully locked.
Platz 61. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 13.662 Bewertungen
42von 100
The program is accessible and clear for absolute beginners, but exercises are monotonous, there is no load progression, and the calorie count diverges from watch data.
Gelobt: Simple short workouts without equipment, straightforward for anyone who has never trained before.
Kritik: No load progression as fitness improves, and exercises do not target the midsection as specifically as the name implies.
Für wen: Complete beginners taking their first steps.
Platz 62. Wert aus Rezensionen: 41 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 76.969 Bewertungen
41von 100
An app with a decade of route history and a wide activity database that is visibly degrading: GPS drops, workouts do not save, and watches show incorrect calories. Loyal users are disappointed.
Gelobt: Years of activity archive and the ability to view old routes and notes keep long-term users loyal.
Kritik: Tracking is unreliable: workouts disappear or are logged with incorrect times, and GPS drops without cause.
Für wen: People who have used the app for years and value their activity history.
Platz 63. Wert aus Rezensionen: 40 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 382.268 Bewertungen
40von 100
An intermittent fasting app with an AI coach and light food logging. As a workout tracker it is very weak: exercise videos are short, technique guidance is vague, and physical progression is not tracked at all. Works as a mindfulness tool around food, not a fitness platform.
Gelobt: The AI coach character Blinky creates a sense of real companionship and helps maintain a fasting schedule without slipping.
Kritik: Exercises max out at 10 minutes, technique instructions are vague, and physical progression is not tracked in any way.
Für wen: Anyone who wants to get into intermittent fasting and is not thinking about strength training.
Platz 64. Wert aus Rezensionen: 40 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 43.026 Bewertungen
40von 100
Ready-made programs with clear structure can help a beginner get started, but plans are static and do not adapt to user level, and the equipment library is limited and does not cover machines.
Gelobt: A beginner gets a ready plan and can walk straight into the gym without thinking about programming.
Kritik: Plans are rigidly fixed: exercises cannot be swapped, days cannot be shifted, and the program cannot be adapted to individual needs.
Für wen: Beginners who need a basic ready-made gym program.
Platz 65. Wert aus Rezensionen: 40 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 9.252 Bewertungen
40von 100
Home Workout for Men offers basic bodyweight programs with video demonstrations of correct technique, but content is extremely limited: no weights or treadmill work, progression is schematic, and the free version is cut to a minimum by day three.
Gelobt: Clear exercise demonstrations with gradually increasing difficulty for beginners.
Kritik: No adaptation for physical limitations: users with wrist issues still get the same push-ups after flagging the problem.
Für wen: Male beginners who need basic bodyweight workouts at home without equipment.
Platz 66. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 2.339.884 Bewertungen
38von 100
A nutrition tracker with a massive food database, not a fitness app in the narrow sense: strength logging is minimal and progression is not tracked. The interface became confusing after a series of updates, and key features like the barcode scanner and voice input are broken or moved behind a paywall.
Gelobt: The food database is enormous, integration with training apps works, and the nutrition journal is straightforward for beginners.
Kritik: After every major update, navigation breaks, key screens get buried behind extra taps, and protein and fat goals reset with every weight change.
Platz 67. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 212.622 Bewertungen
38von 100
Simple bodyweight programs with animated characters aimed at absolute beginners. Exercises work only one side of the body without symmetry, instructions are minimal, and AI videos lack any real technique explanation.
Gelobt: Quick start without extra questions and clear animations for anyone who has never trained.
Kritik: Exercises do not account for body symmetry: one side is trained and the other is ignored.
Für wen: Complete beginners who need a starting point without complexity.
Platz 68. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 43.194 Bewertungen
38von 100
A step counter with a clear interface, but it is a narrow single-purpose tool with no pace analysis, heart rate, or multi-week history without a paid subscription.
Gelobt: A clean daily step count screen without intrusive ads.
Kritik: No way to view detailed step history for past days without a paid version.
Für wen: People who want to monitor activity with a simple step counter.
Platz 69. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 28.226 Bewertungen
38von 100
A women's version of the same template: basic home exercises, good movement visualization, but without paying it is impossible to get past day three. Exercise variety and progression are almost nonexistent.
Gelobt: Visual cues and voiceover maintain form during exercises for first-time users.
Kritik: Load selection does not account for level: exercises are either too easy or jump in difficulty with no gradual transition.
Für wen: Beginner women willing to pay for full access.
Platz 70. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 13.337 Bewertungen
38von 100
A rich toolset for walking with flexible route options and sensor support, but aggressive ads including fraudulent banners and unstable GPS make daily use frustrating.
Gelobt: Flexible route configuration, extra sensor support, and thousands of kilometers of history in one place.
Kritik: GPS tracking drops frequently, and the measured distance on the same route varies by up to a kilometer.
Für wen: Experienced walkers who care about detailed route statistics.
Platz 71. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 10.807 Bewertungen
38von 100
The app offers basic home workouts without equipment with a simple interface, but there is almost no useful content in the free version, and load progression and real results tracking are absent.
Gelobt: A clear workout flow with rest between exercises and a minimalist interface.
Kritik: Minimal exercise variety and no real load progression from session to session.
Für wen: Children and absolute beginners who need the simplest possible home exercises.
Platz 72. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 8.773 Bewertungen
38von 100
A home trainer for women with a 3D coach and basic personalization. Cross-device sync is broken, customizing rep counts produces random values instead of what was entered, making workouts uncontrollable.
Gelobt: Wide selection of home workouts of different lengths without equipment. The 3D coach demonstrates movements clearly.
Kritik: Rep count customization does not work and resets to random values.
Für wen: Beginner women who need short structured workouts at home.
Platz 73. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 73.115 Bewertungen
35von 100
Video workout app with a habit tracker that attracts beginners, but it delivers the same set of exercises every week without real progression. Works as a first step but gets boring quickly.
Gelobt: Video instructions and a wide range of workout types help complete beginners start without stress.
Kritik: The program barely changes from week to week, with no real load progression.
Für wen: Complete beginners who need a start with video instructions and exercise variety.
Platz 74. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 21.409 Bewertungen
35von 100
A minimal 30-day weight-loss program for home use without equipment, but with no real progression or personalization. The calorie tracker is inaccurate and sessions do not adapt to health limitations.
Gelobt: Short workouts fit easily into the day and require no equipment.
Kritik: The program does not account for physical limitations: people who cannot jump due to knee or back issues get no alternative options.
Für wen: Beginners without equipment who need the simplest possible entry point.
Platz 75. Wert aus Rezensionen: 35 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 11.725 Bewertungen
35von 100
Once a decent exercise library with programs, the app is now effectively abandoned: the programs page is empty, workout history disappeared after an update, and support is silent.
Gelobt: A rich multi-year workout history for those who have used it since 2013.
Kritik: The ready-made programs page has been empty for several months, updates are rare, and custom workouts do not save changes.
Für wen: Nobody. The app is effectively abandoned by its developers.
Platz 76. Wert aus Rezensionen: 33 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 72.201 Bewertungen
33von 100
A basic set of equipment-free exercises for the very sedentary, which looks good for the first two days. Exercises do not increase in difficulty, there is no cross-device sync, and there is no automatic transition between exercises.
Gelobt: Short gentle workouts with clear movements suit people who have not been active for a long time.
Kritik: No automatic transition between exercises and no progression in difficulty. Everything stays the same from day one.
Für wen: People with very low baseline activity who want to start moving at home with minimal effort.
Platz 77. Wert aus Rezensionen: 33 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 18.618 Bewertungen
33von 100
Basic circuit workouts with voice technique cues for home use, but the app is technically unstable, has no support, and programs end without a continuation.
Gelobt: Voice instructions on technique during exercises help correct body position without looking at a video.
Kritik: After one program ends there is no next one. Progress stops and it is unclear what to do.
Für wen: Beginners who need basic circuit workouts at home.
Platz 78. Wert aus Rezensionen: 32 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 58.550 Bewertungen
32von 100
Simple timed workouts for weight loss without equipment work as a basic tool, but there is no way to exclude exercises that are contraindicated, and load progression is absent as a concept.
Gelobt: Workouts are short and can be done right in a room without any equipment.
Kritik: Unsuitable exercises cannot be removed from the plan. They repeat again and again even when the user skips them.
Platz 79. Wert aus Rezensionen: 32 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 8.994 Bewertungen
32von 100
A narrowly focused ab-only app with no progression, no tracking, and no proper timer. The product has been frozen at a 2015 level and is no longer evolving.
Gelobt: A few short free ab workouts with nothing to configure.
Kritik: No countdown between exercises, voice cues were removed, and there is no progress tracking or personalization.
Für wen: A beginner who needs 5 to 10 minutes of ab work without any setup.
Platz 80. Wert aus Rezensionen: 31 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 28.568 Bewertungen
31von 100
A gentle tai chi and stretching format for people unaccustomed to physical load. But this is barely a fitness app: no progression, no rep counting, no technique feedback, and calorie tracking accuracy is seriously questionable.
Gelobt: Relaxing morning tai chi and yoga sessions accessible with no athletic background.
Kritik: No load progression system and no exercise variety for those who want to get stronger.
Für wen: Complete beginners or older adults who want gentle morning movement rather than training.
Platz 81. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 7.785 Bewertungen
30von 100
Short 10 to 15-minute video workouts are functional, but progress resets without warning, tracking is minimal, and the exercise set is too easy for anyone who is not an absolute beginner.
Gelobt: Clear 10-minute video workouts that genuinely tire you out despite the short duration.
Kritik: Progress resets to day one regularly without any visible reason.
Für wen: A parent on parental leave or a busy person who needs 10 minutes of training anywhere.
Platz 82. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 675.883 Bewertungen
28von 100
A forced replacement for the popular Fitbit app following the Google acquisition: it tracks device data but is noticeably weaker than its predecessor. Sleep tracking became less accurate, weekly weight data loses historical records, and the AI coach is unstable and drops added exercises.
Gelobt: Apple Health sync has finally stabilized, and Fitbit device data displays correctly for those who have adjusted to the new interface.
Kritik: Sleep tracking is worse than in the original Fitbit app, the historical weight graph is cut to one year, and the AI coach regularly loses changes.
Platz 83. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 37.271 Bewertungen
28von 100
The one free ab plan is decent and builds in difficulty, but almost all content is locked from the very first screens and ads interrupt the workout tempo. As a tool for regular training it does not work.
Gelobt: The increasing difficulty of the base ab plan feels like real progression.
Kritik: Not a single complete program is available without payment, and there are too few exercises for varied training.
Für wen: People who want to try a few ab exercises once, not a regular training tool.
Platz 84. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 18.703 Bewertungen
28von 100
A motivation-based activity tracker with a rewards system, not a full fitness app. The rewards system itself has degraded: gift cards were removed and the replacement is unappealing, killing the main reason to use it.
Gelobt: Tracking active minutes by heart rate zone pushes you to move harder, not just longer.
Kritik: No workout system, no exercises, no progression. Just a tracker of other people's activity.
Für wen: Already-active people who want to earn rewards for what they already do.
Platz 85. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 8.959 Bewertungen
28von 100
A planner with a decent exercise library, but AI plans are widely considered non-functional, glitches cause a single movement to repeat for an hour, and exercises are shown as small thumbnails without video. The product core is unreliable.
Gelobt: The exercise library is broad, and onboarding accounts for fitness level and goals.
Kritik: AI plan generation produces unrealistic programs, there are no video instructions, and the user interface is not intuitive.
Für wen: Someone who wants to build their own plan from the library without relying on AI generation.
Platz 86. Wert aus Rezensionen: 25 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 65.215 Bewertungen
25von 100
Home workouts with video and difficulty levels exist on paper, but the product persistently resets progress on updates, does not allow logging external activities, and gives no flexibility in planning days. The program starts from zero every time.
Gelobt: The ability to adjust workout difficulty at first launch looks thoughtfully designed.
Kritik: Progress resets with every app update, and the workout schedule cannot be shifted to fit your own calendar.
Für wen: People who want to train at home with video guidance and are not focused on tracking progression.
Platz 87. Wert aus Rezensionen: 25 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 34.163 Bewertungen
25von 100
Five days of ab exercises are available for free and are clear enough for beginners, but on day six the app requires payment and will not let you continue. As a progression tool it is useless.
Gelobt: The clear sequence of the first days motivates people who could never bring themselves to do core work before.
Kritik: No exercise variety, no technique explanations, and no real progress without paid access.
Für wen: Complete beginners willing to pay for a 30-day ab plan.
Platz 88. Wert aus Rezensionen: 25 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 7.181 Bewertungen
25von 100
A large directory of home workouts with video, but with no personal plan creation, no level adaptation, and no progress tracking. Videos frequently fail to load and transitions between exercises are too fast.
Gelobt: Wide selection of home workouts with video instructions and monthly fitness challenges that provide structure.
Kritik: No personal plan aligned with user goals: the app works as a catalog with no progression.
Für wen: Someone who wants to pick a workout from a catalog without configuration or planning.
Platz 89. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 26.245 Bewertungen
22von 100
The app has serious problems: it loses progress every time it is reopened and requires re-onboarding. Home mode effectively requires a full gym. Exercises are demonstrated properly, but platform reliability makes consistent training impossible.
Gelobt: Exercises can be organized into muscle-group splits, which is convenient for experienced users.
Kritik: Programs end at level 12 and restart from the beginning, with no real load increase.
Platz 90. Wert aus Rezensionen: 20 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 7.480 Bewertungen
20von 100
The app does nothing that Apple Health does not already do, aside from a few prettier widgets. The workout tracking goal is not fulfilled: it does not capture all activity types and complicates things that already work in Health.
Gelobt: Nice activity ring widgets for those who care about home screen aesthetics.
Kritik: Adds nothing on top of Apple Health in terms of tracking: no programs, no structured workouts, no analytics.
Für wen: Apple Watch users who want a prettier activity ring widget.
Platz 91. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 733.993 Bewertungen
18von 100
A companion app for the offline clubs, not a standalone fitness tool: the core function is QR check-in and class schedule browsing. The exercise library is minimal, workout logging is absent, and simply opening the app consistently fails.
Gelobt: The class schedule and access to basic Teddy workouts are a useful starting point for a beginner right at the club.
Kritik: The app often freezes on the loading screen and will not open. Without the QR check-in it is practically useless.
Für wen: Planet Fitness club members who need a digital membership pass.
Zu den Bewertungen
Zwei Bewertungen — zwei Quellen
Sie helfen beim Vergleich von Apps, ersetzen aber nicht die Prüfung der eigenen Aufgabe.
Rezensionsbewertung · bis 100
Die gespeicherte Bewertung aus der inApp-Recherche zu den Rezensionstexten. Sie beurteilt die App im Archiv insgesamt, nicht die Zuverlässigkeit einer einzelnen Funktion.
Store-Bewertung · bis 5
Die Bewertung von der App-Seite zum Zeitpunkt der Datenerhebung. Aktuelle Bewertung und Version können abweichen.
In der archivierten Stichprobe dieses Themas: 91 Apps und 34.116 gelesene Rezensionen. Das ist der Gesamtumfang der Recherche, nicht die Zahl der Rezensionen pro App.
Ein Abstand zwischen den Bewertungen beweist keine Manipulation. Das Datum der Berechnung und die vollständige Methodik der Bewertung sind nicht im mobilen Archiv. Vergleich die Aufgabenbeschreibungen und die Originalzitate und prüf die Bedingungen in der aktuellen Version.
