Where recipes save from the web and the shopping list builds itself, and where your collection just vanishes. Les meilleures notes d’après le texte des avis : AnyList (82/100), NYT Cooking (78) et Umami (76).
Note des avis : 82 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 78 878 notes
82sur 100
One of the best tools for grocery list management and recipe organization in the category. Family sync is reliable, URL recipe import works, and Apple Watch support is genuinely useful at the store. The missing pieces are store checkout integration and an open API for third-party developers.
Points forts
Instant grocery list sync across all family members has worked reliably for years.
Reproches
No budget tracking inside the list and no open API for integrations.
Pour qui : Families and couples who maintain a shared grocery list and store recipes in one place
Note des avis : 78 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 538 221 notes
78sur 100
An editorial recipe library from the New York Times with thousands of tested recipes and a strong community. The main complaint is that forced app updates cut off users on older devices, and search within saved recipes is clunky.
Points forts
A vast and varied recipe base from professional culinary editors you can actually trust.
Reproches
Saved recipes cannot be organized into folders and are hard to find in a long, unstructured list.
Pour qui : People who want editorially vetted recipes rather than a planner or tracker
Note des avis : 76 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 454 notes
76sur 100
One of the best recipe managers with fast URL import and a convenient shopping list built from selected dishes. The weak spot is unstable import from Instagram and NYT, which frustrates active users on a regular basis.
Points forts
URL-based recipe import works quickly and accurately; a shopping list is ready in seconds.
Reproches
Import from Instagram and some major publications breaks after platform updates.
Pour qui : People who collect recipes from the web and want one tidy place for them
Rang 4. Note des avis : 74 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 52 989 notes
74sur 100
Paprika remains the best personal recipe archive: web import works as expected, there is a planner and shopping list, and data is well structured. The main pain in recent months is that the built-in browser has become unstable and stopped downloading recipes for some users.
Points forts : Instant import of any recipe from the web, stripped of ads and filler text.
Reproches : The built-in browser periodically breaks and fails to load recipes, and the app has gone a long time without updates.
Pour qui : People who build a personal recipe collection from multiple sources
Rang 5. Note des avis : 74 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 2 712 notes
74sur 100
One of the best recipe managers on iOS: smart URL import, step-by-step cooking mode, family sharing, and a clean design. Recipe ratings and calendar integration are still missing, and bulk import from PDF is slow.
Points forts : Importing a recipe from Instagram, a website, or a photo at a friend's kitchen takes a few seconds.
Reproches : No way to rate individual recipes, making it hard to find proven favorites in a large collection.
Pour qui : Passionate home cooks who want a single recipe organizer with family sharing
Rang 6. Note des avis : 72 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 16 227 notes
72sur 100
America's Test Kitchen delivers meticulously developed recipes with video and notes — the strongest content in the category. The downsides are purely technical: the app occasionally fails to open, saved recipe sorting is absent, and there is no meal planner.
Points forts : Recipes are tested repeatedly until the result is perfect, with video and user notes on every dish.
Reproches : No meal planner and no way to copy an ingredient list directly from a recipe.
Pour qui : Serious home cooks who care about recipe reliability above all else
Rang 7. Note des avis : 72 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 8 120 notes
72sur 100
One of the best personal recipe organizers with photo import, OCR, and a simple day-by-day planner. A small rate of data loss and occasional AI extraction failures do not outweigh its overall reliability.
Points forts : A photo of a cookbook or magazine page turns into a structured recipe with a title and ingredient list in seconds.
Reproches : AI import sometimes drops or substitutes ingredients, so the recipe needs a manual check before the first cook.
Pour qui : Anyone who wants to gather family recipes and web finds in one place
Rang 8. Note des avis : 72 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 3 515 notes
72sur 100
One of the best tools for importing recipes from blogs and social media: X-ray mode strips out advertising noise and leaves only the recipe, and cooking mode keeps the screen on. Serving scaling was moved behind a paywall, which frustrates longtime users.
Points forts : X-ray mode removes all blog text and leaves only ingredients and steps; the screen stays on while you cook.
Reproches : Serving scaling became a paid feature despite requiring no server-side processing.
Pour qui : Active home cooks who collect recipes from websites and social media
Rang 9. Note des avis : 72 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 1 169 notes
72sur 100
One of the best tools for saving recipes from web pages in one click: it strips ads and filler text, supports tags, filters, and a menu planner. The main complaints are about the shift to a paid model rather than product problems.
Points forts : Instant recipe saving from any website without copy-pasting or ad clutter.
Reproches : Recipes from Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube cannot be imported directly.
Pour qui : Active collectors of recipes from web pages and cooking blogs
Rang 10. Note des avis : 71 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 1 686 notes
71sur 100
A minimal planner with no excess: enter dish names, assign them to days, share with a partner. A widget, automatic shopping list, and notifications are missing, but the core mechanic works reliably.
Points forts : Simple weekly view, full meal history, and the ability to share the plan with a partner.
Reproches : The shopping list is not generated automatically from the plan, and there is no home screen widget.
Pour qui : People who want a simple weekly meal plan without recipes or extra complexity
Rang 11. Note des avis : 70 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 1 738 notes
70sur 100
One of the best recipe managers for import quality and interface design. Family access and nested recipes set it apart from competitors, but the meal planner is weak.
Points forts : Smart URL import, recipes nested inside each other, and a clean native interface.
Reproches : The meal planner has no breakfast, lunch, and dinner breakdown, which limits its practical use.
Pour qui : People who want to organize a recipe collection beautifully and add new ones easily
Rang 12. Note des avis : 68 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 156 054 notes
68sur 100
A calorie and nutrition tracker with an extensive food database, recipe import, and smart device integration. It handles basic logging well and helps users reach weight goals, but the interface has slowed down and navigation between sections is unnecessarily tangled.
Points forts : A huge food database and the ability to save custom meals make daily logging fast.
Reproches : Recipe import is awkward and poorly documented despite the claimed support.
Pour qui : People who want accurate macro tracking without extra subscriptions or gamification
Rang 13. Note des avis : 68 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 839 notes
68sur 100
A beautiful native recipe collection app with excellent web import, a menu planner, and no subscription. The main issue is that the developer does not respond to support requests and has not updated the app in over a year, and recipe sharing between different iCloud accounts does not work.
Points forts : One-time purchase with no subscription, a polished design, and reliable recipe import from websites.
Reproches : Search requires scrolling all the way to the top of the list, which is frustrating with a collection of thousands of recipes.
Pour qui : Someone with a large personal recipe collection who values design and does not want a monthly fee
Rang 14. Note des avis : 66 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 29 040 notes
66sur 100
Recipe Keeper handles manual entry, web import, and recipe scanning well, and includes a meal planner and shopping list generation. The main limitation is that family sharing requires separate purchases on every device and platform, which makes shared kitchen management inconvenient.
Points forts : Fast recipe import via URL, page scanning, or manual entry into a single archive.
Reproches : No shared family access: each person must buy the app separately on every platform they use.
Pour qui : Home cooks who want to keep a personal recipe archive in one place
Rang 15. Note des avis : 66 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 3 526 notes
66sur 100
A mature recipe storage and organization tool with solid URL import and cross-device sync. Paper recipe scanning is inaccurate, and occasional data loss when switching phones undermines trust.
Points forts : Years of accumulated recipes with URL import, accessible from phone, tablet, and laptop.
Reproches : Scanning and recognizing printed recipes works noticeably worse than in competing apps.
Pour qui : Home cooks with a large personal recipe archive who want to digitize and sync it
Rang 16. Note des avis : 66 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 929 notes
66sur 100
An AI meal planner that genuinely takes over weekly meal selection based on dietary constraints and automatically builds a shopping list. The list occasionally misses ingredients and the AI can be repetitive, but the concept works and saves time.
Points forts : Automatic weekly meal plan tailored to family dietary needs plus a ready shopping list with no manual work.
Reproches : The shopping list sometimes drops ingredients, and old items are not cleared between weeks automatically.
Pour qui : A busy parent or anyone who does not have time to decide what to cook
Rang 17. Note des avis : 65 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 15 640 notes
65sur 100
FitMenCook is a solid collection of fitness-oriented recipes with video and a shopping list. But the meal planner is poorly implemented, allergen filtering is absent, and some recipes depend on the brand's proprietary spice blends.
Points forts : Recipes taste good and fit a fitness routine; new ones are added on a regular basis.
Reproches : No allergen filter and the meal planning feature is not in a working state.
Pour qui : People in an active training routine who want quick, satisfying recipes
Rang 18. Note des avis : 63 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 11 065 notes
63sur 100
Works well at automatically planning a meal-prep week with a ready shopping list. Weak points include no pantry tracking, incomplete allergen filters, and macro adjustment within a narrow range only.
Points forts : In 30 minutes on Sunday it produces a weekly batch-cooking plan with step-by-step video and a shopping list.
Reproches : No way to account for what is already at home, and you cannot add your own recipes to the plan.
Pour qui : Busy people who cook all their food for the week in one session
Rang 19. Note des avis : 63 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 6 234 notes
63sur 100
A strong tool for recipe storage and shopping list generation, but UX quality dropped noticeably after the Samsung acquisition. Import from third-party sites still works, while ingredient accuracy and sync have run into issues.
Points forts : Automatic shopping list generation with ingredients sorted by type, ready to use in the store.
Reproches : Ingredient-based search does not rank recipes by how many pantry items they actually use up.
Pour qui : Home cooks who need to store recipes and build a shopping list quickly
Rang 20. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 247 437 notes
62sur 100
A recipe saving and organization app with URL import, serving scaling, and shopping list generation. Web import works well, but a free limit of 5 recipes cuts users off before they can properly evaluate the product.
Points forts : One-tap URL recipe import and automatic shopping list with serving scaling.
Reproches : Search within your own collection is poor even after paying for a subscription.
Pour qui : People who want to build a personal culinary library from links and social media
Rang 21. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 21 981 notes
62sur 100
Eat This Much works well as an automatic meal plan generator with a shopping list and nutrient tracking. The main problem is that the recipe base gets repetitive and the vegetarian section is thin.
Points forts : Auto-generated meal plan to match your goals, complete with a shopping list and Apple Health sync.
Reproches : The recipe library gets old fast; the same dishes rotate every week.
Pour qui : People who count macros and want to automate grocery shopping
Rang 22. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 3 177 notes
62sur 100
A great idea, but the recipe parser is becoming less reliable: roughly every second or third source fails to parse. Those who get lucky receive a clean recipe stripped of ads and pop-ups, which is genuinely useful at the stove.
Points forts : Extracts the recipe from ad-heavy pages and leaves only the ingredients and instructions.
Reproches : Manual recipe entry is very inconvenient: ingredients cannot be pasted as a list, only added one by one.
Pour qui : People who cook from recipes on culinary websites and want to read them without ads
Rang 24. Note des avis : 60 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 21 525 notes
60sur 100
SuperCook solves a unique problem: it finds recipes based on what you already have at home. The concept works and is genuinely useful, but the app is technically unstable — recipes open to a white screen and favorites do not save.
Points forts : Finds dishes from whatever is already in the fridge, saving time and reducing food waste.
Reproches : Ingredient-based search works, but opening a recipe often leads to a third-party site or hangs.
Pour qui : Anyone who wants to cook from what they have without extra shopping
Rang 25. Note des avis : 60 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 2 451 notes
60sur 100
A solid keto base with recipes, a macro tracker, and a mood journal. Inflexibility with measurement units and gaps in the US food database reduce convenience.
Points forts : A large keto recipe library with macros and a built-in daily tracker.
Reproches : Measurement units are rigid and minimum serving sizes cannot be adjusted to match real portion sizes.
Pour qui : People following keto or low-carb eating who want one place for recipes and tracking
Rang 26. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 53 536 notes
58sur 100
Mealime handles meal planning and automatic shopping lists well, but since late 2025 new recipes have stopped appearing and updates have nearly ceased. The app is losing its audience because of content stagnation, not a weak core mechanic.
Points forts : A smart meal plan that assembles the shopping list without any extra effort; recipes are easy for beginners.
Reproches : The recipe catalog has not been updated in over six months, and you cannot search your own recipes by name inside the planner.
Pour qui : Families who want to cook to a plan without the hassle
Rang 27. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 11 173 notes
58sur 100
A strong concept — scanning a receipt and cooking from what is already in the pantry. But store sync is unstable and social media import breaks periodically.
Points forts : Scanning a paper receipt fills the pantry in seconds and immediately suggests recipes from what you have at home.
Reproches : Store connections drop on their own and do not reconnect for months without manual intervention.
Pour qui : Families who want to cook from pantry stock
Rang 28. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 674 notes
58sur 100
The only genuinely free app in the category with a social angle: save recipes from the web, build a shopping list, and discover new dishes. Ads in the free version interrupt the cooking workflow, and the app crashes occasionally.
Points forts : Free with no hidden subscription, and it combines recipes from multiple sources into one shopping list.
Reproches : Aggressive ads cover the interface and make it hard to follow recipe steps.
Pour qui : Anyone who wants a free recipe planner with a social feed and no subscription
Rang 29. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 396 notes
58sur 100
A high-quality paleo recipe collection with beautiful photos, dynamic serving recalculation, and an automatic shopping list sorted by store aisle. Prep times in recipes are often understated, and some recipes are not strictly paleo.
Points forts : The ingredient list recalculates instantly when you change the serving count.
Reproches : No nutritional info or macro profile for recipes, which matters on a paleo diet.
Pour qui : People following paleo who want inspiration for new dishes
Rang 30. Note des avis : 56 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 22 791 notes
56sur 100
Kitchen Stories was a strong editorial app with video recipes, but after a series of updates the videos disappeared, saved recipes break, and users are pushed toward a paid upgrade. The content is good, but the product is degrading.
Points forts : Varied and inventive recipes with polished presentation; the cooking mode is easy to use.
Reproches : Saved recipes can become locked after an update without warning; video instructions have disappeared.
Pour qui : Culinary enthusiasts willing to tolerate instability
Rang 31. Note des avis : 56 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 1 431 notes
56sur 100
The best tool for saving recipes from social media: Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook posts are parsed into structured recipes. However, the app goes down periodically and family sharing requires a separate subscription.
Points forts : Flawless saving of recipes from social media videos and posts with automatic ingredient parsing.
Reproches : Family use is not accommodated: a second person must pay a separate subscription.
Pour qui : People who actively save recipes from TikTok and Instagram and want quick access to them
Rang 32. Note des avis : 56 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 1 229 notes
56sur 100
A visually appealing meal planner with straightforward dish entry and a convenient shopping list. The main gap: ingredients are not automatically transferred to the list when a recipe is added to the calendar, and planning multiple weeks costs money.
Points forts : Beautiful design and simple dish entry make using the app a daily habit.
Reproches : Collaborative plan editing is not available for families — only view access via a shared link.
Pour qui : Someone who wants to plan meals visually without complexity
Rang 33. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 432 467 notes
55sur 100
Video recipes focused on simplicity and visual appeal from BuzzFeed. The strong point is that the video format lowers the barrier to cooking, but cross-device sync does not work, dietary filters ignore allergens, and sessions do not persist between launches.
Points forts : Video instructions make even unfamiliar dishes approachable and take the fear out of the kitchen.
Reproches : Dietary filters do not actually work: the app continues showing recipes that contain specified allergens.
Pour qui : Cooking beginners who need video format instead of written instructions
Rang 34. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 2 484 notes
55sur 100
Before version 3.0 it was one of the best recipe managers, but the redesign broke familiar workflows and introduced instability. Social media import is still convenient; everything else has degraded.
Points forts : URL import and Instagram recipe saving work instantly and accurately.
Reproches : After the major update, navigation became more confusing and the shopping list is unreliable.
Pour qui : People who frequently save recipes from the web and can tolerate instability
Rang 35. Note des avis : 54 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 6 772 notes
54sur 100
A clean meal-reminder timer for people who forget to eat. It does one thing well, but Apple Watch notifications do not work properly and stability drops after updates.
Points forts : Simplicity and flexible meal scheduling without calorie counting or diet culture.
Reproches : Notifications do not reach the watch and do not let you log a meal without opening the app.
Pour qui : People with a suppressed appetite or a packed schedule who forget to eat
Rang 36. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 52 032 notes
52sur 100
eMeals conveniently connects a meal plan to online grocery ordering, but the shopping list often duplicates ingredients, recipes are criticized for lacking seasoning and variety, and the app is rough on tablet. It pushes Walmart at every launch.
Points forts : One tap sends the shopping list directly to a partner store cart.
Reproches : The shopping list duplicates ingredients; recipes taste flat without extra seasoning.
Pour qui : Busy families who want to cook on a schedule and order groceries online
Rang 37. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 1 649 notes
52sur 100
A good recipe library with a step-by-step cooking mode, but clipboard import is unstable, search returns irrelevant results, and a heavy Walmart tie-in frustrates part of the audience.
Points forts : Step-by-step cooking mode with an image at each step and a large curated recipe base.
Reproches : Search fails to find obvious dishes, and URL recipe import breaks without explanation.
Pour qui : People who want to cook from structured recipes with visual cues
Rang 38. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 573 notes
52sur 100
A simple planner with fast recipe import and a basic shopping list, but cross-device sync fails and recipes sometimes disappear from the dropdown. It works for those who need the bare minimum.
Points forts : Quickly generates a shopping list from planned dishes and is easy to share with a partner.
Reproches : The shopping list cannot be checked off item by item while walking through the store.
Pour qui : Couples who plan meals for the week together
Rang 39. Note des avis : 51 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 8 158 notes
51sur 100
A convenient personal recipe organizer with social media import and a link back to the original video, but there is no weekly planner, Instagram and Facebook import often freezes, and app stability declined after recent updates.
Points forts : Saves video recipes together with a working link to the original rather than just the text.
Reproches : No built-in weekly meal planner, even though users explicitly request exactly that feature.
Pour qui : Cooking enthusiasts who collect recipes from social media
Rang 40. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 82 058 notes
48sur 100
A combined app for short workouts and meal planning. The meal planner and ready menus have delivered real results for long-term users, but the app is frozen in development: Google sign-in is broken, Apple Health integration is absent, and no new recipes are added.
Points forts : Ready weekly menus with simple recipes and short workouts complement each other naturally inside one app.
Reproches : The app has not evolved in years: Google login does not work and there is no Apple Health sync.
Pour qui : People who want to combine short home workouts with a ready meal plan
Rang 41. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 15 429 notes
48sur 100
Fitia works as a calorie tracker with automatic meal plan generation and the core product functions. But the barcode scanner is unreliable, macros in saved recipes change on their own, and AI food recognition needs improvement.
Points forts : Automatically builds a meal plan based on available foods and body composition goals.
Reproches : Saved recipes change their calorie and macro values without reason; the scanner is unreliable.
Pour qui : Spanish-speaking users tracking their diet and weight
Rang 42. Note des avis : 46 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 7 302 notes
46sur 100
A large global community and simple recipe publishing, but search is limited to one language and region, browsing without a subscription is awkward, and useful navigation features were removed in recent updates.
Points forts : Sharing your own recipe with an international community and getting comments from cooks in other countries.
Reproches : The app blocks access to recipes from other countries and languages, even though the website has no such restrictions.
Pour qui : Cooking enthusiasts who want to share recipes with a global community
Rang 43. Note des avis : 46 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 329 notes
46sur 100
A beautiful and intuitive recipe manager with import from browser, screenshots, and cookbook photos. After an update, basic features like categories ended up behind a paywall, and some users lost recipes with no way to restore them.
Points forts : Import works from many sources: browser, Facebook, screenshots, and book photos.
Reproches : Cooking mode does not let you adjust the text size while actively cooking.
Pour qui : People who want to transfer family recipes from paper to their phone
Rang 44. Note des avis : 45 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 32 761 notes
45sur 100
Home Chef earns praise for meal quality and variety, but the app itself is unstable: it freezes at launch, loses selected items when editing an order, and recipes from physical cards cannot be accessed through the app. Choosing meals for the week involves friction.
Points forts : A complete ingredient kit with clear recipes lets you cook new dishes without a special trip for spices.
Reproches : The app freezes at launch and does not save order changes; recipe cards from the box are inaccessible through it.
Pour qui : Busy households who need to cook quickly without planning their own grocery run
Rang 45. Note des avis : 45 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 914 notes
45sur 100
A simple recipe store with web import and automatic ingredient suggestions, but with no cross-Apple-device sync. After recent updates, users encountered intrusive ads overlaying the interface even in the paid version.
Points forts : Fast recipe import from a website and automatic ingredient assembly for the shopping list.
Reproches : No account login or cloud sync, so recipes are not accessible across different devices.
Pour qui : A single iPhone user who needs a simple personal recipe store
Rang 46. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 87 706 notes
44sur 100
A nutrition tracker with a meal planner and Apple Health integration. Long-term users appreciate its simplicity, but a recent update removed gram-based logging, alienating anyone who tracks macros precisely and breaking the core workflow.
Points forts : Apple Health sync and a clean interface with no unnecessary steps work well for daily tracking.
Reproches : After the latest update, quantities can only be entered in vague portions rather than grams, making tracking imprecise.
Pour qui : People just starting to monitor their diet who do not need detailed weight-based tracking
Rang 47. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 41 625 notes
44sur 100
Blue Apron as a service delivers interesting recipes and good ingredient quality, but the app became less convenient after a redesign: current week recipes are harder to find, the planning horizon shrunk to two weeks, and step-by-step instructions during cooking got worse. Users rate the service higher than the app.
Points forts : Recipe cards with step-by-step instructions help you master new dishes without searching for recipes.
Reproches : After the redesign it is hard to find this week's recipes and switch between upcoming deliveries in advance.
Pour qui : Experienced home cooks who value variety in their meal kit delivery
Rang 48. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 13 932 notes
44sur 100
BigOven has built a large recipe base over the years, but the app is now crumbling from within: cooking instructions are buried behind ads, recipe folders sort in a random order, and family sharing does not work properly.
Points forts : A huge recipe base and the ability to maintain a personal collection with folders over many years.
Reproches : Ads cover instructions right in the middle of cooking; folders sort in a random order.
Pour qui : Users with a large accumulated collection who have nowhere else to go
Rang 49. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 11 811 notes
44sur 100
A specialized macro and meal-timing coach for athletes, not a general recipe planner. After a redesign, navigation became so complex that even loyal users gave up on daily tracking.
Points forts : A clear RP-method nutrition structure with automatic macro adjustment for training days.
Reproches : After the redesign the interface is overwhelming: hidden features, logged data loss, and no way to quickly log a meal.
Pour qui : Athletes following RP periodized nutrition
Rang 50. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 3 670 notes
44sur 100
Social media video recipe import works when it works, but it is unstable. Free-tier limits feel like a wall, and accounts with hundreds of recipes disappear after updates.
Points forts : Saving recipes directly from TikTok and Instagram with automatic ingredient extraction.
Reproches : Serving scaling is complicated and changing the number of guests requires too many steps.
Pour qui : Fans of culinary social content who want to collect recipes in one place
Rang 51. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 1 081 notes
44sur 100
A convenient local recipe store with 15 years of history, but sync between iPhone and iPad has been broken for a long time, and an iOS 26 update wiped data for some users. Recipe entry and viewing work well as long as the data is still there.
Points forts : Simple and fast entry of your own recipes with everything stored in one place.
Reproches : Transferring recipes between devices via Bluetooth or local network is unreliable and often fails entirely.
Pour qui : Someone who prefers to keep personal recipes on a single device without cloud storage
Rang 52. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 343 notes
44sur 100
The core idea is good: save a TikTok or Instagram link and get a step-by-step recipe with a shopping list. In practice, import freezes or fails every other attempt, and some users lost all their data after an update.
Points forts : The only app that can parse recipes from TikTok and Instagram videos without manual entry.
Reproches : No categories or folders for recipes; everything piles into one unorganized list.
Pour qui : People who collect recipes from short-form video
Rang 53. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 12 303 notes
42sur 100
Oh She Glows offers quality vegan recipes with beautiful photos, but the app has not been updated in a long time, the content is frozen, and it is technically unstable — recipes sometimes fail to load at all.
Points forts : The recipes taste good even for non-vegans; the presentation is attractive and navigation is simple.
Reproches : No shopping list, no planner, and content has not been updated in over a year.
Pour qui : Vegans familiar with the blog who want the recipes available offline
Rang 54. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 11 112 notes
42sur 100
A simple recipe organizer with convenient browser and camera saving, but a widespread problem with loading recipes from iCloud makes the app unreliable for daily kitchen use.
Points forts : One-tap import from any website and OCR of cookbook pages directly from the camera.
Reproches : iCloud recipes stop opening and the app must be relaunched multiple times in the middle of cooking.
Pour qui : People who want to store a recipe collection from multiple sources
Rang 55. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 1 648 notes
42sur 100
This is a ready meal delivery service with a companion app, not a recipe planner. Reviews are primarily about logistics and food quality rather than planning features. The companion app is unstable.
Points forts : Fast delivery of ready healthy meals with a personalized diet option.
Reproches : The menu repeats too often and variety does not match what is advertised.
Pour qui : Residents of UAE and Qatar ordering ready diet meals with delivery
Rang 56. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,3★ · 1 261 notes
42sur 100
A veteran meal planner with a long history that is now running without support: printing crashes the app, barcode scanning finds nothing, and cross-device sync is unreliable. The core manual meal planning works, but everything around it is falling apart.
Points forts : Flexible manual meal planning with grocery budgeting and custom categories.
Reproches : Recipe import from websites is broken, and an unmaintained app is gradually losing iOS compatibility.
Pour qui : A longtime fan of the app who has nowhere else to go
Rang 57. Note des avis : 41 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 7 121 notes
41sur 100
Content from real professional chefs at a high level, but search and tags are poorly implemented, video lessons cannot be saved with progress, and the app becomes very slow after extended use.
Points forts : Techniques and recipes from working chefs that you cannot find on mainstream cooking platforms.
Reproches : Search and tags work erratically: there is no way to filter free content from paid or find recipes by technique.
Pour qui : Professional chefs and culinary school students
Rang 58. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 867 309 notes
38sur 100
A weight-loss app with coaching and nutrition tracking that is only tangentially related to recipes and meal planning. The bulk of reviews document constant loading failures, intrusive gamification with virtual seeds, and a bloated interface after updates.
Points forts : When it works without crashes, it genuinely helps with weight loss through a psychological approach and calorie tracking.
Reproches : The interface is overloaded with animations and game mechanics that get in the way of quickly logging a meal.
Pour qui : People who want structured weight-loss coaching, not just recipes
Rang 59. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 31 146 notes
38sur 100
CHEF iQ is aimed at controlling a smart thermometer and connected devices, not meal planning. Recipes in the app are tied to the hardware and cover a narrow range of scenarios. After a redesign the interface got worse and device connection is unstable.
Points forts : Precise temperature control with flip prompts makes grilling predictable.
Reproches : After the update the interface became more complex; recipes are limited to compatible equipment and do not cover regular cooking.
Pour qui : Owners of CHEF iQ smart thermometers who need cooking temperature control
Rang 60. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 13 807 notes
38sur 100
RecipeBox worked well as a personal recipe archive with web import, but after monetization the product degraded: intrusive Walmart ads appear on every screen transition, and import now saves only a link instead of the actual content.
Points forts : One-click recipe import from the web and convenient manual organization by category.
Reproches : Import increasingly saves only a link rather than the recipe itself, making the collection dependent on third-party sites.
Pour qui : Anyone who wants to store recipes in one place without planning features
Rang 61. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 7 949 notes
38sur 100
Good, varied recipes every week, but this is a companion app to a physical delivery service where the real problems are spoiled ingredients and incomplete boxes. The iPad app does not rotate to landscape.
Points forts : The weekly recipe rotation genuinely does not repeat, which even critical users appreciate.
Reproches : The step-by-step cooking mode breaks periodically, and the iPad app only works in portrait orientation.
Pour qui : Marley Spoon subscribers who need a digital recipe card
Rang 62. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 6 157 notes
38sur 100
The app as a meal kit interface is reasonably convenient, but the Start Cooking button stopped working after an update, making step-by-step mode inaccessible. The core product experience issue lies outside the app: wrong and spoiled ingredients in the box.
Points forts : A wide selection of vegetarian and family recipes with clear step-by-step instructions.
Reproches : The Start Cooking button stopped working after an update; step-by-step mode is unavailable.
Pour qui : Busy families who need a ready ingredient kit with simple recipes
Rang 63. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 2 163 notes
38sur 100
Automatic meal planning that works for Whole30 and AIP, but the app runs slowly, allergen filters are unreliable, and the algorithm generates repetitive menus without enough variety.
Points forts : Automatically assembles a plan and grocery list for the chosen dietary protocol.
Reproches : The algorithm cycles through the same recipes repeatedly; menu variety is extremely limited.
Pour qui : People doing Whole30 or AIP who want a ready plan without choosing meals themselves
Rang 64. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 1 405 notes
38sur 100
The app offers a simple daily meal plan without frills, but that is where the positives end. There are no macros, the meal-swap filter does not work by meal type, and the shopping list deletes unchecked items.
Points forts : A clear daily meal schedule with no extra screens or decisions required.
Reproches : No diet customization: you cannot swap a dish by meal type or save a recipe you like without adding it to the plan.
Pour qui : A beginner to Mediterranean eating who needs the simplest possible starting point
Rang 65. Note des avis : 34 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 24 028 notes
34sur 100
Green Chef is a meal kit delivery service, not a recipe app. The app itself is basic, and the key user pain points are navigation through the menu and the absence of a favorites filter.
Points forts : Recipes are clear and quick to follow; the food is good according to users who actually got to the kitchen.
Reproches : No persistent diet filter; there is no normal way to find a liked dish again later.
Pour qui : Green Chef service customers, not for independent meal planning
Rang 66. Note des avis : 32 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 219 296 notes
32sur 100
A companion app to a meal kit delivery service. The culinary content itself is good, but the app chronically fails: it does not save meal selections, sends random menus, ignores allergens, and crashes regularly after updates.
Points forts : Step-by-step instructions help you cook dishes that used to feel too difficult.
Reproches : Weekly meal selections are not saved and the app sends random menus instead of the ones you chose.
Pour qui : HelloFresh subscribers who need to manage their orders, not people looking for recipes
Rang 67. Note des avis : 30 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 48 806 notes
30sur 100
HitMeal presents itself as a calorie tracker rather than a recipe planner: the barcode scanner is unreliable, there is no cross-device sync, and meal planning features are minimal. As a recipe and meal planning tool it is weaker than competitors.
Points forts : A simple interface for starting out with calorie and macro tracking with no learning curve.
Reproches : The barcode scanner is unreliable; data does not sync between phone and tablet.
Pour qui : Calorie-counting beginners who do not need a full meal planner
Rang 68. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 99 223 notes
28sur 100
A recipe library from Condé Nast with content from Bon Appétit and other publications. The recipes are good quality, but the app regularly freezes at launch, fails to open for a large share of users, dietary filters do not work, and saved recipe organization is entirely absent.
Points forts : High-quality editorial content from Bon Appétit with useful user comments beneath each recipe.
Reproches : No folders or search within saved recipes — a long flat list with no structure is unusable.
Pour qui : Condé Nast subscribers who want access to Bon Appétit content
Rang 69. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 29 349 notes
28sur 100
The app offers a keto recipe collection, but saved favorites do not persist between sessions, the interface is unstable, and a full meal planner is effectively absent. Technical problems substantially undercut the value of the content.
Points forts : A wide selection of keto recipes with clear instructions that helps beginners get started on the diet.
Reproches : Saved recipes reset after closing the app; the meal planning feature is almost completely absent.
Pour qui : People just starting keto who need ready recipes to get going
Rang 70. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 1 921 notes
28sur 100
Meal plans without detailed recipes and with questionable dish compositions; functionality is limited. A significant share of five-star reviews was obtained through incentivization.
Points forts : Simple onboarding with personalization to your goal and lifestyle.
Reproches : Meal plans without step-by-step recipes or proper proportions; date navigation is awkward.
Pour qui : Practically no one who actually wants to cook to a plan
Rang 71. Note des avis : 25 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 25 572 notes
25sur 100
Anova Culinary functions as sous vide device control; the recipe and guide section became unstable after recent updates. For most users the Guides section crashes on every open, and reconnecting the device is required every session.
Points forts : Remote start and temperature monitoring for sous vide via the phone works accurately with a stable connection.
Reproches : The guides and recipes section crashes on every open; device reconnection is required at every session.
Pour qui : Anova circulator owners who need temperature control without recipe planning
Rang 72. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 10 021 notes
22sur 100
The app blocks access to its own recipes with a long, unskippable onboarding sequence, and most positive reviews are empty. Recipes are decent in concept but do not scale to a real number of servings.
Points forts : A visually clean interface and a reasonable selection of quick recipes for those who actually reach the content.
Reproches : Recipes do not show a serving count and cannot be scaled, so there is no way to adapt them to a real number of people.
Pour qui : Hard to recommend to anyone in the current state
Rang 73. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,0★ · 3 013 notes
22sur 100
A slow cooker recipe collection with an extremely unreliable access system: users pay for premium and cannot open the recipes. There is no meaningful meal planning or shopping list functionality.
Points forts : Some slow cooker recipes are practical and work for busy parents.
Reproches : Category navigation loses your position in the list and randomly jumps to a different part of the catalog.
Pour qui : Slow cooker owners who need a basic recipe set without extra features
Rang 74. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 766 notes
22sur 100
The app regularly loses all saved recipes after updates or re-login, and import is unreliable and often drops partway through to system settings. The product is too raw and unreliable to serve as a recipe store.
Points forts : The idea of importing recipes directly from Instagram and TikTok via the share sheet is appealing.
Reproches : Recipes disappear after an app update or plan change; there is no backup option.
Rang 75. Note des avis : 18 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,3★ · 6 912 notes
18sur 100
The app offers a limited recipe set and does not allow adding your own dishes. There is almost no product value; users cannot properly plan meals or maintain their own diet.
Points forts : A few ready recipes look appealing and prompt users to start thinking about healthy eating.
Reproches : You cannot add your own dish to the plan; only recipes from the app's built-in library are allowed.
Pour qui : Beginners who need ready meal ideas without any flexibility
Rang 76. Note des avis : 8 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 477 notes
8sur 100
The app does not open for most users, support is silent, and the recipes do not follow the spirit of Whole30. There is almost no functional meal planning here.
Points forts : A few users note tasty and simple recipes when the app actually works.
Reproches : No way to add sides or accompaniments to dishes; recipes do not combine into a complete meal.
Pour qui : Not recommended to anyone in the current state
Rang 77. Note des avis : 3 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 2,5★ · 412 notes
3sur 100
The app impersonates the well-known Allrecipes website, charges money, and does not open any recipes. Actual Allrecipes representatives publicly confirmed they have no connection to this app.
Points forts : Users who got a refund through Apple at least managed to resolve the issue through store support.
Reproches : Recipe search does not work at all; there is almost no content inside.
Pour qui : No one
À propos des chiffres
Deux chiffres — deux sources
Elles aident à comparer les apps, mais ne remplacent pas la vérification de ta propre tâche.
Score des avis · jusqu’à 100
Le score conservé de l’étude inApp sur les textes des avis. Il évalue l’ensemble de l’app dans l’archive, pas la fiabilité d’une fonction précise.
Note de la boutique · jusqu’à 5
La note de la page de l’app au moment de la collecte. La note et la version actuelles peuvent différer.
Dans l’échantillon archivé de ce sujet : 77 apps et 22 822 avis lus. C’est le volume total de l’étude, pas le nombre d’avis par app.
Un écart entre les chiffres ne prouve pas de manipulation. La date de calcul et la méthode complète du score ne sont pas dans l’archive mobile. Compare les descriptions des tâches et les citations sources, et vérifie les conditions dans la version actuelle.
