Note des avis : 81 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 155 583 notes
81sur 100
Based on user descriptions, the app offers structured strength and cardio programs with live coaches, nutrition tracking, and equipment flexibility. Real quality is hard to assess due to a suspicious rating distribution.
Points forts
Live coach programs, nutrition integration, and equipment adaptability working together in one place.
Reproches
Higher membership tiers are effectively unsupported even though they are still being sold.
Pour qui : People who want to train at home or in the gym under coach guidance with nutrition tracking.
Note des avis : 79 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 77 017 notes
79sur 100
One of the best gym loggers available: a massive exercise library, program folders, set history, and a solid web interface for planning. Apple Watch sync works roughly half the time.
Points forts
Program folders and instant set history give a real sense of progress without extra taps.
Reproches
Changing the weight on the first set does not automatically update the rest, which breaks flow mid-workout.
Pour qui : Gym regulars who care about accurate weight logging and tracking exercise progression.
Note des avis : 74 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 43 003 notes
74sur 100
Structured programs with exercise substitutions and a weekly planner keep women on track with their training. The biggest gaps are weight history and the lack of cross-program planning.
Points forts
Ready-made programs with weekly schedules that do not require any planning on your part.
Reproches
Weight history cannot be viewed outside of an active workout, and bodyweight exercise progress is not tracked.
Pour qui : Women who want a ready-made program without writing their own training plan.
Rang 4. Note des avis : 72 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 297 445 notes
72sur 100
A vast library of structured home programs (P90X, Insanity, 21 Day Fix) with live coaches and clear weekly progression. The content is proven and built to last years, but the technical side is rough: Chromecast is unstable and audio sometimes drifts from video.
Points forts : Dozens of complete multi-week programs with well-designed progressive overload and professional coaches, making home training genuinely structured.
Reproches : Casting to a TV via Chromecast is unreliable, and audio goes out of sync with video after updates without a fix on restart.
Pour qui : Anyone who wants a structured home program without going to a gym.
Rang 5. Note des avis : 72 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 93 490 notes
72sur 100
The best free micronutrient tracker on the market: detailed nutritional breakdowns, a barcode scanner, and flexible configuration. A recent food search update significantly disrupted the daily logging flow.
Points forts : The depth of nutrient tracking is unmatched by competitors: vitamins, minerals, and amino acids all in one place.
Reproches : After the update, food search no longer ranks frequent items first, requiring extra scrolling every time.
Pour qui : People who track micronutrients and macronutrient composition seriously.
Rang 6. Note des avis : 68 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 43 973 notes
68sur 100
Structured programs with video instruction for every exercise, warm-up and cool-down built in, and a per-set rep tracker make this one of the best options for women training in the gym. That said, all programs feel similar in style and get repetitive after a few months.
Points forts : Short video clips for every exercise plus built-in warm-ups create the feeling of having a personal trainer right there.
Reproches : Different coaches in the app offer nearly identical plans, so there is effectively no real choice of training style.
Pour qui : Women training at the gym who want a structured program.
Rang 7. Note des avis : 68 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 32 554 notes
68sur 100
Strongest in logging and Apple Watch Ultra integration: quick to create a workout, easy to adjust on the fly, and minimal phone checking needed. Weaker on motivation and weight recommendations for beginners.
Points forts : Deep Apple Watch integration combined with simple creation and editing of custom programs.
Reproches : Supersets are not intuitive and do not switch automatically, and there are no weight recommendations for beginners.
Pour qui : Experienced Apple Watch users who know what they are doing and want a convenient training log.
Rang 8. Note des avis : 68 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 12 665 notes
68sur 100
One of the best free set-and-rep trackers with progression history and Dynamic Island support. Clean and fast in daily use, though the exercise library is small and volume analytics are limited.
Points forts : Simple fast data entry during a workout and per-exercise progress history.
Reproches : The exercise library is limited, many machine movements are missing, and progress charts lack point-level detail.
Pour qui : Strength athletes who want a minimal tracker without extras.
Rang 9. Note des avis : 68 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 9 292 notes
68sur 100
Boostcamp stands out with a library of real programs from recognized coaches, progressive overload built in, and a solid workout log, making it a strong gym tool. Recent updates degraded the timer and cluttered the interface, but the product core remains strong.
Points forts : A catalog of ready programs from real coaches with automatic weight progression from session to session.
Reproches : The timer resets when the app is backgrounded, making rest periods between sets awkward to manage.
Pour qui : Gym athletes who want proven programs with built-in progression and no need to write their own plans.
Rang 10. Note des avis : 66 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 164 092 notes
66sur 100
A strong platform for gym-based strength training with video demonstrations and customizable programs. Weight progression is designed without accounting for daily context and fatigue, leading to inaccurate recommendations.
Points forts : Video and text instructions for every exercise plus the ability to adjust the program to available equipment.
Reproches : The progression system does not account for the difference between the first set of the day and the third set of the week's third session.
Pour qui : Gym users who want a structured ready-made plan without writing one themselves.
Rang 11. Note des avis : 63 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 21 085 notes
63sur 100
A wide variety of programs with real coaches covering strength, cardio, and recovery together. The platform is technically unstable: it logs people out regularly and fails to save completed workouts, undermining any sense of progress.
Points forts : The variety of coaches and training styles makes it possible to find the approach that actually keeps you motivated.
Reproches : No personalized progression: the app does not track strength gains or adjust load from week to week.
Pour qui : People who want live-coach workouts across a range of formats.
Rang 12. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 812 143 notes
62sur 100
A strong library of live classes and programs covering cycling, strength, and meditation with real instructors and a genuine community feel. The technical side falls short: Apple Watch crashes on launch, bike sync drops mid-ride, and class search and filtering are frustrating on phone.
Points forts : A vast library of formats and instructors keeps motivation going for years, and the competitive atmosphere in live rides feels real.
Reproches : Sync between phone, bike, and Apple Watch is unreliable, the program filter does not work, and a bug makes class stacks impossible to reorder.
Pour qui : Peloton bike owners or people paying for a full subscription.
Rang 13. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 282 744 notes
62sur 100
A large library of video workouts with live coaches, well suited for home training without equipment. Post-workout navigation and the absence of an exercise list before starting a video noticeably hurt the experience.
Points forts : Wide selection of formats from 5 to 45 minutes with real coaches and a positive atmosphere.
Reproches : No preview of exercises inside a video before it starts, which matters for people with physical limitations.
Pour qui : Home workouts without equipment, especially for busy people and beginners.
Rang 14. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 10 455 notes
62sur 100
Fitlist handles strength training logging well: custom exercises, a weight and set progression log, and superset support. A recent major update degraded navigation and broke the auto-cycle for supersets, frustrating loyal users.
Points forts : A flexible workout builder with weight and set history for every exercise across all past sessions.
Reproches : After the last update, supersets no longer automatically cycle back to the first exercise, and search became less accurate.
Pour qui : Gym athletes who need an accurate set and weight log with progression history.
Rang 15. Note des avis : 61 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 16 646 notes
61sur 100
A solid strength platform with AI-generated plans, rest timers, and a good movement library. Development has stalled for a year, Apple Watch sync has errors, and custom workouts disappear when switching between apps.
Points forts : Automatic workout plan creation by training split removes the need to program sessions yourself.
Reproches : No new programs have been added in over a year, and repeated exercises within one plan start to feel stale after a few months.
Pour qui : People training with a barbell and dumbbells who already pay for Peloton.
Rang 16. Note des avis : 61 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 15 903 notes
61sur 100
The AI trainer adapts the program to injuries and fitness level, which sets this app apart, but frequent nutrition freezes and session instability substantially reduce its usefulness.
Points forts : The AI accounts for injury limitations and rebuilds the training plan around them automatically.
Reproches : No smartwatch support, the app must stay open throughout the entire session, and the gym exercise library is incomplete.
Rang 17. Note des avis : 60 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 375 473 notes
60sur 100
One of the oldest running trackers: clean interface, flexible activity history, and a unique shoe mileage tracking feature. The transition to ASICS ownership introduced sync issues with Apple Watch, and some users lost years of historical data.
Points forts : Run filtering by distance and time works better than competitors, and shoe wear tracking is a rare and genuinely useful feature.
Reproches : After updates, Apple Watch sync breaks periodically, saving a workout requires extra taps, and some users lost their archives during the ASICS migration.
Pour qui : Runners who care about their run history and tracking shoe wear.
Rang 18. Note des avis : 60 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 76 367 notes
60sur 100
Best-in-class app for the Stronglifts 5x5 protocol: automatic weight progression, a clean interface, and focus on one methodology without clutter. However, there is only one program and initial increments cannot be customized.
Points forts : Automatic weight increases from workout to workout according to program rules remove all decisions from the user.
Reproches : A single program and no exercise variety make the app useless beyond the base protocol.
Pour qui : Beginner and intermediate lifters following the Stronglifts 5x5 program strictly.
Rang 19. Note des avis : 60 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 46 702 notes
60sur 100
One of the most detailed strength training trackers: a large exercise library, Apple Watch sync, and weight-increase suggestions all work well, but aggressive UI updates regularly break familiar workflows.
Points forts : Weight increase suggestions based on set history actually help users avoid getting stuck at the same level.
Reproches : New interface updates hide needed data right during a workout, making it harder to focus on the exercise.
Pour qui : Regular gym-goers who need detailed progress analytics.
Rang 20. Note des avis : 60 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 40 380 notes
60sur 100
A solid exercise rotation base and voice announcement of the next movement are genuine gym advantages, but the AI assistant ignores equipment preferences poorly, and supersets combining a barbell with a cable in one round are unrealistic in a busy gym.
Points forts : Voice announcement of the next exercise and last working weight without looking at the screen.
Reproches : The AI coach does not retain equipment preference changes and creates supersets out of stations on opposite sides of the gym.
Pour qui : People who want structured rotation without writing their own programs.
Rang 21. Note des avis : 60 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 14 085 notes
60sur 100
Does its job well: video instructions, countdown timer, the ability to queue multiple sets in a row without extra steps. Ideal for short home workouts.
Points forts : Start and train, nothing extra. Instructions are clear and multiple workouts can be queued up.
Reproches : No Apple Watch support, custom workouts do not sync between devices, and the pause feature is awkward.
Pour qui : Busy people who need short home workouts.
Rang 22. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 103 945 notes
58sur 100
A simple run and walk tracker with a GPS route map, target distance, and basic stats. GPS accuracy is inconsistent, progress is lost on reinstall, and there is no profile sync across devices.
Points forts : Route map and real-time distance without unnecessary complexity for daily walks and runs.
Reproches : Progress is not tied to an account and is completely lost on reinstall or device change.
Pour qui : Casual walkers and runners who need a simple GPS tracker without extra features.
Rang 23. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 30 699 notes
58sur 100
The AI trainer adapts load to available equipment and helps beginners get into strength training, but the equipment catalog is thin, calves fall out of the program, and plans start repeating over time.
Points forts : AI chat with a trainer that explains technique in real time and adjusts the program.
Reproches : The equipment catalog is too narrow, calves drop out of leg day plans, and exercise variety runs out over time.
Pour qui : Strength training beginners who need a starting plan without a gym.
Rang 24. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 6 782 notes
58sur 100
Strong content from a real coaching duo with an extensive video library and no-equipment options, but the app is technically rough: freezes, TV streaming issues, and inaccurate timers frustrate regular users.
Points forts : Live workouts from Coach Kozak and Claudia with form cues and modifications for different fitness levels.
Reproches : Search and filtering are inconsistent, the no-equipment mode is not respected, and strength programs for older adults are nearly absent.
Pour qui : Home workouts without a gym or personal trainer.
Rang 25. Note des avis : 57 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 30 369 notes
57sur 100
A wide range of formats from stretching to cardio and strength, well suited for corporate wellness programs. Apple Health and Watch sync breaks, plan progress resets, and the exercise structure in individual workouts is weak.
Points forts : Wide selection of short workouts across different types that fit easily into a work day.
Reproches : No real progressive overload system or personalization to fitness level.
Pour qui : Office workers who need short movement breaks as part of a corporate wellness program.
Rang 26. Note des avis : 56 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 33 571 notes
56sur 100
A marketplace of real coaches with solid content for those who have found their coach. Videos buffer frequently, the app structure disorients newcomers, and there is no quality control across different coaches' content.
Points forts : Specific coaches with methodically built programs who carry real accountability for quality.
Reproches : Videos regularly freeze mid-exercise, and tapping an instructional clip resets the workout timer.
Pour qui : People who have already found their online coach and want to follow that person's program.
Rang 27. Note des avis : 56 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 10 595 notes
56sur 100
Full Fitness has one of the best exercise libraries and a flexible workout builder for experienced athletes, but switching long-time buyers to a subscription without compensation, an outdated interface, and data-saving problems seriously undermine trust in the app.
Points forts : A deep exercise library with the ability to build custom workouts from scratch without structural constraints.
Reproches : The interface is dated, font and icons are too small for use in the gym, and navigation is awkward.
Pour qui : Experienced athletes who need a flexible workout builder with a detailed log.
Rang 28. Note des avis : 56 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 7 127 notes
56sur 100
A strong AI planner for the gym with equipment awareness, detailed exercise instructions, and a voice AI trainer. A series of updates broke the rest timer, weight conversion, and launch stability, undermining a good product core.
Points forts : AI plan is built around the specific equipment available in your gym, with detailed instructions for every exercise.
Reproches : After updates the rest timer stopped vibrating and sending notifications, which disrupts workout rhythm.
Pour qui : Gym-goers who want an AI plan tailored to real equipment without a live trainer.
Rang 29. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 474 148 notes
55sur 100
A reliable GPS tracker for walking, running, and cycling with a convenient route map and activity history. GPS accuracy varies: the same route on different days gives different distances, and at a slow pace the distance inflates noticeably.
Points forts : The route map after a walk provides visual motivation and allows you to compare familiar paths.
Reproches : GPS is inconsistent: walking speed affects measured distance, and the same road shows a different result every time.
Pour qui : Walkers and light outdoor enthusiasts who care about route maps.
Rang 30. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 136 728 notes
55sur 100
Clear timer-and-round mechanics for high-intensity seven-minute bodyweight workouts. The streak and achievement system works as a solid habit-building tool, but program variety is very limited.
Points forts : The streak system and gamification genuinely help maintain consistency without an external coach.
Reproches : No way to mark a missed day due to injury or illness without losing streak progress.
Pour qui : People who want short equipment-free workouts and external motivation through gamification.
Rang 31. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 81 929 notes
55sur 100
Gamification of strength training through ranks and streaks genuinely motivates part of the audience. But the exercise library is narrow, watch sync is absent, and the ranking algorithm breaks down for running.
Points forts : The ranking and streak system turns the gym into a game and builds the habit better than a plain progress table.
Reproches : Thin exercise library: exotic names are present, common ones are missing, and the food search for nutrition tracking barely works.
Pour qui : Gamification fans who find a plain log boring without a competitive element.
Rang 32. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 57 574 notes
55sur 100
Audio workouts with real coaches for running and cardio are well produced and the catalog is broad, but content updates have effectively stopped, which is critical for a subscription product.
Points forts : Multiple coaches with distinct delivery styles make audio sessions feel alive rather than robotic.
Reproches : Content has not been updated for months: regular users exhaust the running and strength audio catalog.
Pour qui : Running and cardio fans who want an audio coach.
Rang 33. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 33 882 notes
55sur 100
A clear step-by-step plan with exercise videos and a long-standing user base works as a basic gym companion. It lacks flexibility for equipment substitutions and has no per-set tracking.
Points forts : A step-by-step plan with video that removes the need to think about what comes next.
Reproches : Cannot adapt the plan to missing equipment, and per-set tracking is not supported.
Pour qui : Gym beginners who need a ready-made plan without extra configuration.
Rang 34. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 22 889 notes
55sur 100
A solid app with a large exercise library and custom workouts that worked well for years. After the 2024 subscription shift, editing custom workouts was removed and old data was locked behind the paywall, hitting the core audience hard.
Points forts : Exercise library with movement demonstrations and the ability to build custom workouts around specific goals.
Reproches : After the 2024 update, the order of exercises in custom workouts can no longer be rearranged during a session.
Pour qui : Experienced users who build their own programs and want a flexible tracker.
Rang 35. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 14 066 notes
55sur 100
A good selection of video home workouts with a personal plan, but the Apple Watch app is unstable and several features behave unpredictably after updates.
Points forts : Video-guided workouts feel like training with a coach at home.
Reproches : The Apple Watch app crashes repeatedly, social features are non-functional, and videos sometimes fail to load.
Pour qui : Home athletes without a gym membership.
Rang 36. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 12 576 notes
55sur 100
Strong heart rate zone visualization and comparison with past workouts suit cardio training, but data appears with a delay and the interface is cluttered, making quick access to key metrics difficult.
Points forts : Clean cardio summaries with heart rate zones and multi-year comparisons.
Reproches : Workout data can take several hours to appear, and the interface is crowded and hard to read.
Pour qui : Cardio athletes who train with a heart rate monitor.
Rang 37. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 2,9★ · 11 110 notes
55sur 100
Apple Fitness integrates well with Watch and Health and offers a wide range of formats from HIIT to Pilates with live trainers, but suffers from fundamental problems: no video scrubbing, activity tracking skips segments, and friend competitions work only intermittently.
Points forts : Rich selection of workout formats from short 10-minute sessions to long programs with professional trainers.
Reproches : No scrubbing or resume-from-position in video workouts, which is critical for recorded classes.
Pour qui : Apple Watch users who want video workouts inside the Apple ecosystem.
Rang 38. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 8 789 notes
55sur 100
The only app in its niche that tracks load and recommends recovery instead of pushing for records. The load algorithm can be overly conservative: it sometimes demands three rest days after a 30-minute walk, which erodes trust in its recommendations.
Points forts : The philosophy of moving sustainably without burning out genuinely helps people build a lasting habit.
Reproches : The load recommendation algorithm does not work correctly without Apple Watch and overestimates fatigue.
Pour qui : Anyone who has burned out on fitness streaks and wants a gentle tracker without pressure to hit records.
Rang 39. Note des avis : 53 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 115 846 notes
53sur 100
Structured bodyweight programs for home use with a weight-loss forecast and plans by muscle group. Without any actual strength or load progress metrics, the app remains a collection of videos rather than a tool for tracking growth.
Points forts : Equipment-free workouts get done without a gym visit and fit well into a daily routine.
Reproches : No tracking of load or strength progress whatsoever, only a completion checkmark.
Pour qui : Beginners with no equipment who need a ready-made home program.
Rang 40. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 123 048 notes
52sur 100
The classic seven-minute HIIT protocol works cleanly and requires no equipment. After the app redesign, custom programs degraded and navigating to the main workout became more steps than before.
Points forts : Quick classic HIIT protocol without equipment, with Apple Health sync.
Reproches : After the update, custom workouts stopped saving and were buried behind additional steps.
Pour qui : People who need a short standard HIIT workout without configuration or extra steps.
Rang 42. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 65 176 notes
52sur 100
Trainerize is strong as a coach-side tool: an organized exercise library, programs, and client communication are well built. But frequent platform crashes and lost set history turn workouts into a gamble.
Points forts : A coach can upload their programs and hand them to a client immediately without extra explanation.
Reproches : Weight and rep history periodically disappears, which defeats the entire purpose of progressive overload.
Rang 43. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 22 214 notes
52sur 100
One of the few apps with genuine AI load adaptation and a serious bodyweight approach requiring no equipment, but exercises cycle and repeat, and movement variety is limited to the HIIT format.
Points forts : The AI coach adapts load and genuinely progresses difficulty based on feedback after each workout.
Reproches : Exercises are extremely repetitive: the same movements appear up to ten times in one session without variation.
Pour qui : People who train without equipment and want external program structure.
Rang 44. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 16 459 notes
52sur 100
A solid strength tracker with a good exercise database and progression logic, but the AI trainer is rough and glitchy, and the in-workout interface gets in the way with constant pop-ups.
Points forts : Convenient logging of weights per machine and tracking personal records across several years.
Reproches : The AI program builder glitches when days are skipped, the timer covers input fields, and editing a created workout is awkward.
Pour qui : Strength athletes who need a simple digital training log.
Rang 45. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 11 431 notes
52sur 100
Fitify offers varied home workouts with a timer and a decent exercise library, but timer-only workouts without rep counting frustrate advanced users. The AI coach Mike runs erratically and is frequently interrupted by ads.
Points forts : Clean session structure for beginners: warm-up, main workout, and cool-down flow as one continuous block.
Reproches : No rep-counting mode, only a timer, which does not work for strength training with progressive overload.
Pour qui : Beginners who need timer-based home workouts without equipment.
Rang 46. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 7 657 notes
52sur 100
One of the more mature trackers with a large video workout library, a timer, and a coach voice. Recent updates have replaced some content with random YouTube clips instead of original workouts, degrading the quality of the established library.
Points forts : Massive filterable workout library, and the voice coach during sessions provides real motivation.
Reproches : The workout library is degrading: new content is being replaced by external YouTube videos without quality checks.
Pour qui : Experienced users who need a broad library filterable by muscle group and duration.
Rang 47. Note des avis : 50 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 44 029 notes
50sur 100
Simple home workouts by muscle group with a minimal interface work for maintaining basic fitness, but there is no program depth: no progression, no level adaptation, and no way to build custom routines.
Points forts : A minimalist design and no extra screens let you start a workout in seconds.
Reproches : No load progression: the app does not know whether things got easier and does not increase difficulty.
Pour qui : People who need a quick home workout without any configuration.
Rang 48. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 55 623 notes
48sur 100
The app logs workouts and suggests progressive overload with visualization, but the exercise selection algorithm repeats itself and the kettlebell and non-standard movement library is thin.
Points forts : Visual weight progress and load-increase cues help a beginner avoid stagnation.
Reproches : After several months the plan stops changing: the same 9 to 10 reps and the same exercises on repeat.
Pour qui : Gym beginners who need a ready-made program.
Rang 49. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 10 617 notes
48sur 100
Home Workout - Fitness Planner offers personalized plans with an AI coach and a decent exercise library, but progression is too fast for beginners, real-time voice cues are absent, and workout history disappears after updates.
Points forts : An adaptive plan based on fitness level and goals is created at first launch without extra steps.
Reproches : No verbal form cues in real time, so exercises must be memorized beforehand.
Pour qui : Beginners who need a structured home plan without equipment.
Rang 50. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 8 399 notes
48sur 100
Well-chosen exercises for older adults with live instructors and video, but intensity is too low even for the target audience, instructions are not synchronized with the trainer's movements, and the gender filter for coaches does not work as advertised.
Points forts : Real live trainers instead of animated characters, at a pace that is comfortable for older adults.
Reproches : Voice instructions lag behind on-screen movements, which is confusing during more complex exercises.
Pour qui : Adults 60 and older who prioritize movement safety and a simple interface.
Rang 51. Note des avis : 46 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,3★ · 58 571 notes
46sur 100
A solid structure of home workouts without equipment with a flexible schedule fit, but the movement library is small and there is no progressive overload between weeks.
Points forts : Workouts fit into any day of the week and require no equipment at all.
Reproches : No progressive overload mechanic: the program does not get harder automatically as fitness improves.
Pour qui : Beginners training at home without equipment.
Rang 52. Note des avis : 45 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 134 315 notes
45sur 100
Muscle Booster covers a wide range of formats from strength to tai chi and chair workouts for older and low-mobility users. The home and gym sections were built by different teams without a shared standard: audio cues and weight recommendations are inconsistent between the two.
Points forts : Chair workouts and tai chi for older users with limited mobility actually deliver results.
Reproches : The home and gym sections operate by different rules: one has audio cues and the other has weight recommendations, and they do not overlap.
Pour qui : Older adults and people with limited mobility who need adapted workout formats.
Rang 53. Note des avis : 45 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,2★ · 9 411 notes
45sur 100
StrongHer offers workouts for women with difficulty and duration options, but the program selection is very narrow, new plans are rarely added, and weekly schedule customization by day is not available.
Points forts : Workouts of varying lengths from 10 minutes let you fit a session into even a packed day.
Reproches : A workout cannot be moved to another day in the schedule, which breaks the plan as soon as anything changes.
Pour qui : Women who want structured short strength workouts at home.
Rang 54. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 707 995 notes
44sur 100
Aimed at beginners with a basic no-equipment body program and a built-in food journal. Exercises are short and clear, but difficulty level is not adjustable, technique instructions are thin, and the program algorithm keeps pushing the same muscle groups.
Points forts : The no-equipment program genuinely works for beginners: short daily routines are easy to fit into any schedule.
Reproches : No real control over the program: the app picks exercises on its own and constantly adds leg work even when other zones are selected.
Pour qui : Complete beginners who want to start moving at home from scratch.
Rang 55. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 142 801 notes
44sur 100
An app for the home rehab program prescribed by a physical therapist. The core problem is not the content but the mechanics: exercise timers consistently do not match what the specialist prescribed, and there is no simple way to log completion outside the app.
Points forts : Video demonstrations help confirm correct technique when performing rehab exercises at home.
Reproches : Exercise timers are not synchronized with therapist prescriptions: a 30-second hold becomes a 5-second timer on screen.
Pour qui : Patients on a home rehabilitation program prescribed by a physical therapist.
Rang 56. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 82 058 notes
44sur 100
Once a functional combination of short workouts and meal plans that helped people lose significant weight. The product has stagnated: no updates in two years, some programs removed, and no smartwatch integration.
Points forts : Short 10 to 20-minute workouts paired with a meal plan work as a unified weight-loss tool.
Reproches : No ability to create custom workouts or recipes, and the program does not adapt to progress once the level cap is reached.
Pour qui : Beginners who want a simple combination of short workouts and nutrition guidance without setup.
Rang 57. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 14 928 notes
44sur 100
The app was a convenient tracker with exercise video demonstrations, but development has officially ended: bugs are not fixed and cross-device sync does not work.
Points forts : Simple custom workout creation and technique video instructions.
Reproches : Development is abandoned: training plans reset, sharing is broken, and cross-device sync does not work.
Pour qui : Anyone who does not yet know that support has ended.
Rang 58. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 11 070 notes
44sur 100
Fitplan is built around celebrity coaches and structured plans with video demonstrations, but systematic server outages and the inability to access paid accounts make the product unreliable. Plans are not updated and the library is shrinking.
Points forts : Plans from real trainers with video for every exercise give the feeling of working with a personal coach.
Reproches : No way to reset and restart a completed plan, which breaks any cyclical approach to the program.
Pour qui : Fans of specific fitness trainers willing to tolerate service instability.
Rang 59. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 762 553 notes
42sur 100
A functionally simple calorie counter with a large food database and a working label scanner, but monetization has become the main UX barrier: ads appear after every log entry and the paywall keeps expanding. Workout tracking is barely used.
Points forts : The food database is detailed, the label scanner is accurate, and the journal helps maintain a deficit and produces real results with consistent use.
Reproches : Ads appear literally after every food entry added, and creating a custom recipe is confusingly complex.
Pour qui : People willing to pay who want only calorie counting.
Rang 60. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 28 324 notes
42sur 100
Simple home workouts with step-by-step video, but the program hits a wall at day 3 or 4, after which the value is essentially zero. There is no depth: exercises repeat and progression is weak.
Points forts : Video demonstration of each exercise helps beginners understand the technique from the first try.
Reproches : The program is structured so that actual training is only possible for the first two days. After that the content is fully locked.
Pour qui : People trying their first home workouts.
Rang 61. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 13 662 notes
42sur 100
The program is accessible and clear for absolute beginners, but exercises are monotonous, there is no load progression, and the calorie count diverges from watch data.
Points forts : Simple short workouts without equipment, straightforward for anyone who has never trained before.
Reproches : No load progression as fitness improves, and exercises do not target the midsection as specifically as the name implies.
Pour qui : Complete beginners taking their first steps.
Rang 62. Note des avis : 41 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 76 969 notes
41sur 100
An app with a decade of route history and a wide activity database that is visibly degrading: GPS drops, workouts do not save, and watches show incorrect calories. Loyal users are disappointed.
Points forts : Years of activity archive and the ability to view old routes and notes keep long-term users loyal.
Reproches : Tracking is unreliable: workouts disappear or are logged with incorrect times, and GPS drops without cause.
Pour qui : People who have used the app for years and value their activity history.
Rang 63. Note des avis : 40 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 382 268 notes
40sur 100
An intermittent fasting app with an AI coach and light food logging. As a workout tracker it is very weak: exercise videos are short, technique guidance is vague, and physical progression is not tracked at all. Works as a mindfulness tool around food, not a fitness platform.
Points forts : The AI coach character Blinky creates a sense of real companionship and helps maintain a fasting schedule without slipping.
Reproches : Exercises max out at 10 minutes, technique instructions are vague, and physical progression is not tracked in any way.
Pour qui : Anyone who wants to get into intermittent fasting and is not thinking about strength training.
Rang 64. Note des avis : 40 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 43 026 notes
40sur 100
Ready-made programs with clear structure can help a beginner get started, but plans are static and do not adapt to user level, and the equipment library is limited and does not cover machines.
Points forts : A beginner gets a ready plan and can walk straight into the gym without thinking about programming.
Reproches : Plans are rigidly fixed: exercises cannot be swapped, days cannot be shifted, and the program cannot be adapted to individual needs.
Pour qui : Beginners who need a basic ready-made gym program.
Rang 65. Note des avis : 40 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 9 252 notes
40sur 100
Home Workout for Men offers basic bodyweight programs with video demonstrations of correct technique, but content is extremely limited: no weights or treadmill work, progression is schematic, and the free version is cut to a minimum by day three.
Points forts : Clear exercise demonstrations with gradually increasing difficulty for beginners.
Reproches : No adaptation for physical limitations: users with wrist issues still get the same push-ups after flagging the problem.
Pour qui : Male beginners who need basic bodyweight workouts at home without equipment.
Rang 66. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 2 339 884 notes
38sur 100
A nutrition tracker with a massive food database, not a fitness app in the narrow sense: strength logging is minimal and progression is not tracked. The interface became confusing after a series of updates, and key features like the barcode scanner and voice input are broken or moved behind a paywall.
Points forts : The food database is enormous, integration with training apps works, and the nutrition journal is straightforward for beginners.
Reproches : After every major update, navigation breaks, key screens get buried behind extra taps, and protein and fat goals reset with every weight change.
Pour qui : Beginners who need only a food journal.
Rang 67. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 212 622 notes
38sur 100
Simple bodyweight programs with animated characters aimed at absolute beginners. Exercises work only one side of the body without symmetry, instructions are minimal, and AI videos lack any real technique explanation.
Points forts : Quick start without extra questions and clear animations for anyone who has never trained.
Reproches : Exercises do not account for body symmetry: one side is trained and the other is ignored.
Pour qui : Complete beginners who need a starting point without complexity.
Rang 68. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 43 194 notes
38sur 100
A step counter with a clear interface, but it is a narrow single-purpose tool with no pace analysis, heart rate, or multi-week history without a paid subscription.
Points forts : A clean daily step count screen without intrusive ads.
Reproches : No way to view detailed step history for past days without a paid version.
Pour qui : People who want to monitor activity with a simple step counter.
Rang 69. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 28 226 notes
38sur 100
A women's version of the same template: basic home exercises, good movement visualization, but without paying it is impossible to get past day three. Exercise variety and progression are almost nonexistent.
Points forts : Visual cues and voiceover maintain form during exercises for first-time users.
Reproches : Load selection does not account for level: exercises are either too easy or jump in difficulty with no gradual transition.
Pour qui : Beginner women willing to pay for full access.
Rang 70. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 13 337 notes
38sur 100
A rich toolset for walking with flexible route options and sensor support, but aggressive ads including fraudulent banners and unstable GPS make daily use frustrating.
Points forts : Flexible route configuration, extra sensor support, and thousands of kilometers of history in one place.
Reproches : GPS tracking drops frequently, and the measured distance on the same route varies by up to a kilometer.
Pour qui : Experienced walkers who care about detailed route statistics.
Rang 71. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 10 807 notes
38sur 100
The app offers basic home workouts without equipment with a simple interface, but there is almost no useful content in the free version, and load progression and real results tracking are absent.
Points forts : A clear workout flow with rest between exercises and a minimalist interface.
Reproches : Minimal exercise variety and no real load progression from session to session.
Pour qui : Children and absolute beginners who need the simplest possible home exercises.
Rang 72. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 8 773 notes
38sur 100
A home trainer for women with a 3D coach and basic personalization. Cross-device sync is broken, customizing rep counts produces random values instead of what was entered, making workouts uncontrollable.
Points forts : Wide selection of home workouts of different lengths without equipment. The 3D coach demonstrates movements clearly.
Reproches : Rep count customization does not work and resets to random values.
Pour qui : Beginner women who need short structured workouts at home.
Rang 73. Note des avis : 35 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 73 115 notes
35sur 100
Video workout app with a habit tracker that attracts beginners, but it delivers the same set of exercises every week without real progression. Works as a first step but gets boring quickly.
Points forts : Video instructions and a wide range of workout types help complete beginners start without stress.
Reproches : The program barely changes from week to week, with no real load progression.
Pour qui : Complete beginners who need a start with video instructions and exercise variety.
Rang 74. Note des avis : 35 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 21 409 notes
35sur 100
A minimal 30-day weight-loss program for home use without equipment, but with no real progression or personalization. The calorie tracker is inaccurate and sessions do not adapt to health limitations.
Points forts : Short workouts fit easily into the day and require no equipment.
Reproches : The program does not account for physical limitations: people who cannot jump due to knee or back issues get no alternative options.
Pour qui : Beginners without equipment who need the simplest possible entry point.
Rang 75. Note des avis : 35 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 11 725 notes
35sur 100
Once a decent exercise library with programs, the app is now effectively abandoned: the programs page is empty, workout history disappeared after an update, and support is silent.
Points forts : A rich multi-year workout history for those who have used it since 2013.
Reproches : The ready-made programs page has been empty for several months, updates are rare, and custom workouts do not save changes.
Pour qui : Nobody. The app is effectively abandoned by its developers.
Rang 76. Note des avis : 33 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 72 201 notes
33sur 100
A basic set of equipment-free exercises for the very sedentary, which looks good for the first two days. Exercises do not increase in difficulty, there is no cross-device sync, and there is no automatic transition between exercises.
Points forts : Short gentle workouts with clear movements suit people who have not been active for a long time.
Reproches : No automatic transition between exercises and no progression in difficulty. Everything stays the same from day one.
Pour qui : People with very low baseline activity who want to start moving at home with minimal effort.
Rang 77. Note des avis : 33 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 18 618 notes
33sur 100
Basic circuit workouts with voice technique cues for home use, but the app is technically unstable, has no support, and programs end without a continuation.
Points forts : Voice instructions on technique during exercises help correct body position without looking at a video.
Reproches : After one program ends there is no next one. Progress stops and it is unclear what to do.
Pour qui : Beginners who need basic circuit workouts at home.
Rang 78. Note des avis : 32 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 58 550 notes
32sur 100
Simple timed workouts for weight loss without equipment work as a basic tool, but there is no way to exclude exercises that are contraindicated, and load progression is absent as a concept.
Points forts : Workouts are short and can be done right in a room without any equipment.
Reproches : Unsuitable exercises cannot be removed from the plan. They repeat again and again even when the user skips them.
Pour qui : Beginners aiming to lose weight at home.
Rang 79. Note des avis : 32 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 8 994 notes
32sur 100
A narrowly focused ab-only app with no progression, no tracking, and no proper timer. The product has been frozen at a 2015 level and is no longer evolving.
Points forts : A few short free ab workouts with nothing to configure.
Reproches : No countdown between exercises, voice cues were removed, and there is no progress tracking or personalization.
Pour qui : A beginner who needs 5 to 10 minutes of ab work without any setup.
Rang 80. Note des avis : 31 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 28 568 notes
31sur 100
A gentle tai chi and stretching format for people unaccustomed to physical load. But this is barely a fitness app: no progression, no rep counting, no technique feedback, and calorie tracking accuracy is seriously questionable.
Points forts : Relaxing morning tai chi and yoga sessions accessible with no athletic background.
Reproches : No load progression system and no exercise variety for those who want to get stronger.
Pour qui : Complete beginners or older adults who want gentle morning movement rather than training.
Rang 81. Note des avis : 30 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 7 785 notes
30sur 100
Short 10 to 15-minute video workouts are functional, but progress resets without warning, tracking is minimal, and the exercise set is too easy for anyone who is not an absolute beginner.
Points forts : Clear 10-minute video workouts that genuinely tire you out despite the short duration.
Reproches : Progress resets to day one regularly without any visible reason.
Pour qui : A parent on parental leave or a busy person who needs 10 minutes of training anywhere.
Rang 82. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 675 883 notes
28sur 100
A forced replacement for the popular Fitbit app following the Google acquisition: it tracks device data but is noticeably weaker than its predecessor. Sleep tracking became less accurate, weekly weight data loses historical records, and the AI coach is unstable and drops added exercises.
Points forts : Apple Health sync has finally stabilized, and Fitbit device data displays correctly for those who have adjusted to the new interface.
Reproches : Sleep tracking is worse than in the original Fitbit app, the historical weight graph is cut to one year, and the AI coach regularly loses changes.
Pour qui : Fitbit device users who have no choice.
Rang 83. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 37 271 notes
28sur 100
The one free ab plan is decent and builds in difficulty, but almost all content is locked from the very first screens and ads interrupt the workout tempo. As a tool for regular training it does not work.
Points forts : The increasing difficulty of the base ab plan feels like real progression.
Reproches : Not a single complete program is available without payment, and there are too few exercises for varied training.
Pour qui : People who want to try a few ab exercises once, not a regular training tool.
Rang 84. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 18 703 notes
28sur 100
A motivation-based activity tracker with a rewards system, not a full fitness app. The rewards system itself has degraded: gift cards were removed and the replacement is unappealing, killing the main reason to use it.
Points forts : Tracking active minutes by heart rate zone pushes you to move harder, not just longer.
Reproches : No workout system, no exercises, no progression. Just a tracker of other people's activity.
Pour qui : Already-active people who want to earn rewards for what they already do.
Rang 85. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 8 959 notes
28sur 100
A planner with a decent exercise library, but AI plans are widely considered non-functional, glitches cause a single movement to repeat for an hour, and exercises are shown as small thumbnails without video. The product core is unreliable.
Points forts : The exercise library is broad, and onboarding accounts for fitness level and goals.
Reproches : AI plan generation produces unrealistic programs, there are no video instructions, and the user interface is not intuitive.
Pour qui : Someone who wants to build their own plan from the library without relying on AI generation.
Rang 86. Note des avis : 25 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 65 215 notes
25sur 100
Home workouts with video and difficulty levels exist on paper, but the product persistently resets progress on updates, does not allow logging external activities, and gives no flexibility in planning days. The program starts from zero every time.
Points forts : The ability to adjust workout difficulty at first launch looks thoughtfully designed.
Reproches : Progress resets with every app update, and the workout schedule cannot be shifted to fit your own calendar.
Pour qui : People who want to train at home with video guidance and are not focused on tracking progression.
Rang 87. Note des avis : 25 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 34 163 notes
25sur 100
Five days of ab exercises are available for free and are clear enough for beginners, but on day six the app requires payment and will not let you continue. As a progression tool it is useless.
Points forts : The clear sequence of the first days motivates people who could never bring themselves to do core work before.
Reproches : No exercise variety, no technique explanations, and no real progress without paid access.
Pour qui : Complete beginners willing to pay for a 30-day ab plan.
Rang 88. Note des avis : 25 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 7 181 notes
25sur 100
A large directory of home workouts with video, but with no personal plan creation, no level adaptation, and no progress tracking. Videos frequently fail to load and transitions between exercises are too fast.
Points forts : Wide selection of home workouts with video instructions and monthly fitness challenges that provide structure.
Reproches : No personal plan aligned with user goals: the app works as a catalog with no progression.
Pour qui : Someone who wants to pick a workout from a catalog without configuration or planning.
Rang 89. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 26 245 notes
22sur 100
The app has serious problems: it loses progress every time it is reopened and requires re-onboarding. Home mode effectively requires a full gym. Exercises are demonstrated properly, but platform reliability makes consistent training impossible.
Points forts : Exercises can be organized into muscle-group splits, which is convenient for experienced users.
Reproches : Programs end at level 12 and restart from the beginning, with no real load increase.
Rang 90. Note des avis : 20 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 7 480 notes
20sur 100
The app does nothing that Apple Health does not already do, aside from a few prettier widgets. The workout tracking goal is not fulfilled: it does not capture all activity types and complicates things that already work in Health.
Points forts : Nice activity ring widgets for those who care about home screen aesthetics.
Reproches : Adds nothing on top of Apple Health in terms of tracking: no programs, no structured workouts, no analytics.
Pour qui : Apple Watch users who want a prettier activity ring widget.
Rang 91. Note des avis : 18 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 733 993 notes
18sur 100
A companion app for the offline clubs, not a standalone fitness tool: the core function is QR check-in and class schedule browsing. The exercise library is minimal, workout logging is absent, and simply opening the app consistently fails.
Points forts : The class schedule and access to basic Teddy workouts are a useful starting point for a beginner right at the club.
Reproches : The app often freezes on the loading screen and will not open. Without the QR check-in it is practically useless.
Pour qui : Planet Fitness club members who need a digital membership pass.
À propos des chiffres
Deux chiffres — deux sources
Elles aident à comparer les apps, mais ne remplacent pas la vérification de ta propre tâche.
Score des avis · jusqu’à 100
Le score conservé de l’étude inApp sur les textes des avis. Il évalue l’ensemble de l’app dans l’archive, pas la fiabilité d’une fonction précise.
Note de la boutique · jusqu’à 5
La note de la page de l’app au moment de la collecte. La note et la version actuelles peuvent différer.
Dans l’échantillon archivé de ce sujet : 91 apps et 34 116 avis lus. C’est le volume total de l’étude, pas le nombre d’avis par app.
Un écart entre les chiffres ne prouve pas de manipulation. La date de calcul et la méthode complète du score ne sont pas dans l’archive mobile. Compare les descriptions des tâches et les citations sources, et vérifie les conditions dans la version actuelle.
