Where recipes save from the web and the shopping list builds itself, and where your collection just vanishes. Die besten Werte aus den Rezensionstexten: AnyList (82/100), NYT Cooking (78) und Umami (76).
Wert aus Rezensionen: 82 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 78.878 Bewertungen
82von 100
One of the best tools for grocery list management and recipe organization in the category. Family sync is reliable, URL recipe import works, and Apple Watch support is genuinely useful at the store. The missing pieces are store checkout integration and an open API for third-party developers.
Gelobt
Instant grocery list sync across all family members has worked reliably for years.
Kritik
No budget tracking inside the list and no open API for integrations.
Für wen: Families and couples who maintain a shared grocery list and store recipes in one place
Wert aus Rezensionen: 78 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 538.221 Bewertungen
78von 100
An editorial recipe library from the New York Times with thousands of tested recipes and a strong community. The main complaint is that forced app updates cut off users on older devices, and search within saved recipes is clunky.
Gelobt
A vast and varied recipe base from professional culinary editors you can actually trust.
Kritik
Saved recipes cannot be organized into folders and are hard to find in a long, unstructured list.
Für wen: People who want editorially vetted recipes rather than a planner or tracker
Wert aus Rezensionen: 76 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 454 Bewertungen
76von 100
One of the best recipe managers with fast URL import and a convenient shopping list built from selected dishes. The weak spot is unstable import from Instagram and NYT, which frustrates active users on a regular basis.
Gelobt
URL-based recipe import works quickly and accurately; a shopping list is ready in seconds.
Kritik
Import from Instagram and some major publications breaks after platform updates.
Für wen: People who collect recipes from the web and want one tidy place for them
Platz 4. Wert aus Rezensionen: 74 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 52.989 Bewertungen
74von 100
Paprika remains the best personal recipe archive: web import works as expected, there is a planner and shopping list, and data is well structured. The main pain in recent months is that the built-in browser has become unstable and stopped downloading recipes for some users.
Gelobt: Instant import of any recipe from the web, stripped of ads and filler text.
Kritik: The built-in browser periodically breaks and fails to load recipes, and the app has gone a long time without updates.
Für wen: People who build a personal recipe collection from multiple sources
Platz 5. Wert aus Rezensionen: 74 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 2.712 Bewertungen
74von 100
One of the best recipe managers on iOS: smart URL import, step-by-step cooking mode, family sharing, and a clean design. Recipe ratings and calendar integration are still missing, and bulk import from PDF is slow.
Gelobt: Importing a recipe from Instagram, a website, or a photo at a friend's kitchen takes a few seconds.
Kritik: No way to rate individual recipes, making it hard to find proven favorites in a large collection.
Für wen: Passionate home cooks who want a single recipe organizer with family sharing
Platz 6. Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 16.227 Bewertungen
72von 100
America's Test Kitchen delivers meticulously developed recipes with video and notes — the strongest content in the category. The downsides are purely technical: the app occasionally fails to open, saved recipe sorting is absent, and there is no meal planner.
Gelobt: Recipes are tested repeatedly until the result is perfect, with video and user notes on every dish.
Kritik: No meal planner and no way to copy an ingredient list directly from a recipe.
Für wen: Serious home cooks who care about recipe reliability above all else
Platz 7. Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 8.120 Bewertungen
72von 100
One of the best personal recipe organizers with photo import, OCR, and a simple day-by-day planner. A small rate of data loss and occasional AI extraction failures do not outweigh its overall reliability.
Gelobt: A photo of a cookbook or magazine page turns into a structured recipe with a title and ingredient list in seconds.
Kritik: AI import sometimes drops or substitutes ingredients, so the recipe needs a manual check before the first cook.
Für wen: Anyone who wants to gather family recipes and web finds in one place
Platz 8. Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 3.515 Bewertungen
72von 100
One of the best tools for importing recipes from blogs and social media: X-ray mode strips out advertising noise and leaves only the recipe, and cooking mode keeps the screen on. Serving scaling was moved behind a paywall, which frustrates longtime users.
Gelobt: X-ray mode removes all blog text and leaves only ingredients and steps; the screen stays on while you cook.
Kritik: Serving scaling became a paid feature despite requiring no server-side processing.
Für wen: Active home cooks who collect recipes from websites and social media
Platz 9. Wert aus Rezensionen: 72 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.169 Bewertungen
72von 100
One of the best tools for saving recipes from web pages in one click: it strips ads and filler text, supports tags, filters, and a menu planner. The main complaints are about the shift to a paid model rather than product problems.
Gelobt: Instant recipe saving from any website without copy-pasting or ad clutter.
Kritik: Recipes from Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube cannot be imported directly.
Für wen: Active collectors of recipes from web pages and cooking blogs
Platz 10. Wert aus Rezensionen: 71 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 1.686 Bewertungen
71von 100
A minimal planner with no excess: enter dish names, assign them to days, share with a partner. A widget, automatic shopping list, and notifications are missing, but the core mechanic works reliably.
Gelobt: Simple weekly view, full meal history, and the ability to share the plan with a partner.
Kritik: The shopping list is not generated automatically from the plan, and there is no home screen widget.
Für wen: People who want a simple weekly meal plan without recipes or extra complexity
Platz 11. Wert aus Rezensionen: 70 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.738 Bewertungen
70von 100
One of the best recipe managers for import quality and interface design. Family access and nested recipes set it apart from competitors, but the meal planner is weak.
Gelobt: Smart URL import, recipes nested inside each other, and a clean native interface.
Kritik: The meal planner has no breakfast, lunch, and dinner breakdown, which limits its practical use.
Für wen: People who want to organize a recipe collection beautifully and add new ones easily
Platz 12. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 156.054 Bewertungen
68von 100
A calorie and nutrition tracker with an extensive food database, recipe import, and smart device integration. It handles basic logging well and helps users reach weight goals, but the interface has slowed down and navigation between sections is unnecessarily tangled.
Gelobt: A huge food database and the ability to save custom meals make daily logging fast.
Kritik: Recipe import is awkward and poorly documented despite the claimed support.
Für wen: People who want accurate macro tracking without extra subscriptions or gamification
Platz 13. Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 839 Bewertungen
68von 100
A beautiful native recipe collection app with excellent web import, a menu planner, and no subscription. The main issue is that the developer does not respond to support requests and has not updated the app in over a year, and recipe sharing between different iCloud accounts does not work.
Gelobt: One-time purchase with no subscription, a polished design, and reliable recipe import from websites.
Kritik: Search requires scrolling all the way to the top of the list, which is frustrating with a collection of thousands of recipes.
Für wen: Someone with a large personal recipe collection who values design and does not want a monthly fee
Platz 14. Wert aus Rezensionen: 66 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 29.040 Bewertungen
66von 100
Recipe Keeper handles manual entry, web import, and recipe scanning well, and includes a meal planner and shopping list generation. The main limitation is that family sharing requires separate purchases on every device and platform, which makes shared kitchen management inconvenient.
Gelobt: Fast recipe import via URL, page scanning, or manual entry into a single archive.
Kritik: No shared family access: each person must buy the app separately on every platform they use.
Für wen: Home cooks who want to keep a personal recipe archive in one place
Platz 15. Wert aus Rezensionen: 66 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 3.526 Bewertungen
66von 100
A mature recipe storage and organization tool with solid URL import and cross-device sync. Paper recipe scanning is inaccurate, and occasional data loss when switching phones undermines trust.
Gelobt: Years of accumulated recipes with URL import, accessible from phone, tablet, and laptop.
Kritik: Scanning and recognizing printed recipes works noticeably worse than in competing apps.
Für wen: Home cooks with a large personal recipe archive who want to digitize and sync it
Platz 16. Wert aus Rezensionen: 66 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 929 Bewertungen
66von 100
An AI meal planner that genuinely takes over weekly meal selection based on dietary constraints and automatically builds a shopping list. The list occasionally misses ingredients and the AI can be repetitive, but the concept works and saves time.
Gelobt: Automatic weekly meal plan tailored to family dietary needs plus a ready shopping list with no manual work.
Kritik: The shopping list sometimes drops ingredients, and old items are not cleared between weeks automatically.
Für wen: A busy parent or anyone who does not have time to decide what to cook
Platz 17. Wert aus Rezensionen: 65 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 15.640 Bewertungen
65von 100
FitMenCook is a solid collection of fitness-oriented recipes with video and a shopping list. But the meal planner is poorly implemented, allergen filtering is absent, and some recipes depend on the brand's proprietary spice blends.
Gelobt: Recipes taste good and fit a fitness routine; new ones are added on a regular basis.
Kritik: No allergen filter and the meal planning feature is not in a working state.
Für wen: People in an active training routine who want quick, satisfying recipes
Platz 18. Wert aus Rezensionen: 63 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 11.065 Bewertungen
63von 100
Works well at automatically planning a meal-prep week with a ready shopping list. Weak points include no pantry tracking, incomplete allergen filters, and macro adjustment within a narrow range only.
Gelobt: In 30 minutes on Sunday it produces a weekly batch-cooking plan with step-by-step video and a shopping list.
Kritik: No way to account for what is already at home, and you cannot add your own recipes to the plan.
Für wen: Busy people who cook all their food for the week in one session
Platz 19. Wert aus Rezensionen: 63 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 6.234 Bewertungen
63von 100
A strong tool for recipe storage and shopping list generation, but UX quality dropped noticeably after the Samsung acquisition. Import from third-party sites still works, while ingredient accuracy and sync have run into issues.
Gelobt: Automatic shopping list generation with ingredients sorted by type, ready to use in the store.
Kritik: Ingredient-based search does not rank recipes by how many pantry items they actually use up.
Für wen: Home cooks who need to store recipes and build a shopping list quickly
Platz 20. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 247.437 Bewertungen
62von 100
A recipe saving and organization app with URL import, serving scaling, and shopping list generation. Web import works well, but a free limit of 5 recipes cuts users off before they can properly evaluate the product.
Gelobt: One-tap URL recipe import and automatic shopping list with serving scaling.
Kritik: Search within your own collection is poor even after paying for a subscription.
Für wen: People who want to build a personal culinary library from links and social media
Platz 21. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 21.981 Bewertungen
62von 100
Eat This Much works well as an automatic meal plan generator with a shopping list and nutrient tracking. The main problem is that the recipe base gets repetitive and the vegetarian section is thin.
Gelobt: Auto-generated meal plan to match your goals, complete with a shopping list and Apple Health sync.
Kritik: The recipe library gets old fast; the same dishes rotate every week.
Für wen: People who count macros and want to automate grocery shopping
Platz 22. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 3.177 Bewertungen
62von 100
A great idea, but the recipe parser is becoming less reliable: roughly every second or third source fails to parse. Those who get lucky receive a clean recipe stripped of ads and pop-ups, which is genuinely useful at the stove.
Gelobt: Extracts the recipe from ad-heavy pages and leaves only the ingredients and instructions.
Kritik: Manual recipe entry is very inconvenient: ingredients cannot be pasted as a list, only added one by one.
Für wen: People who cook from recipes on culinary websites and want to read them without ads
Platz 24. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 21.525 Bewertungen
60von 100
SuperCook solves a unique problem: it finds recipes based on what you already have at home. The concept works and is genuinely useful, but the app is technically unstable — recipes open to a white screen and favorites do not save.
Gelobt: Finds dishes from whatever is already in the fridge, saving time and reducing food waste.
Kritik: Ingredient-based search works, but opening a recipe often leads to a third-party site or hangs.
Für wen: Anyone who wants to cook from what they have without extra shopping
Platz 25. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 2.451 Bewertungen
60von 100
A solid keto base with recipes, a macro tracker, and a mood journal. Inflexibility with measurement units and gaps in the US food database reduce convenience.
Gelobt: A large keto recipe library with macros and a built-in daily tracker.
Kritik: Measurement units are rigid and minimum serving sizes cannot be adjusted to match real portion sizes.
Für wen: People following keto or low-carb eating who want one place for recipes and tracking
Platz 26. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 53.536 Bewertungen
58von 100
Mealime handles meal planning and automatic shopping lists well, but since late 2025 new recipes have stopped appearing and updates have nearly ceased. The app is losing its audience because of content stagnation, not a weak core mechanic.
Gelobt: A smart meal plan that assembles the shopping list without any extra effort; recipes are easy for beginners.
Kritik: The recipe catalog has not been updated in over six months, and you cannot search your own recipes by name inside the planner.
Für wen: Families who want to cook to a plan without the hassle
Platz 27. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 11.173 Bewertungen
58von 100
A strong concept — scanning a receipt and cooking from what is already in the pantry. But store sync is unstable and social media import breaks periodically.
Gelobt: Scanning a paper receipt fills the pantry in seconds and immediately suggests recipes from what you have at home.
Kritik: Store connections drop on their own and do not reconnect for months without manual intervention.
Für wen: Families who want to cook from pantry stock
Platz 28. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 674 Bewertungen
58von 100
The only genuinely free app in the category with a social angle: save recipes from the web, build a shopping list, and discover new dishes. Ads in the free version interrupt the cooking workflow, and the app crashes occasionally.
Gelobt: Free with no hidden subscription, and it combines recipes from multiple sources into one shopping list.
Kritik: Aggressive ads cover the interface and make it hard to follow recipe steps.
Für wen: Anyone who wants a free recipe planner with a social feed and no subscription
Platz 29. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 396 Bewertungen
58von 100
A high-quality paleo recipe collection with beautiful photos, dynamic serving recalculation, and an automatic shopping list sorted by store aisle. Prep times in recipes are often understated, and some recipes are not strictly paleo.
Gelobt: The ingredient list recalculates instantly when you change the serving count.
Kritik: No nutritional info or macro profile for recipes, which matters on a paleo diet.
Für wen: People following paleo who want inspiration for new dishes
Platz 30. Wert aus Rezensionen: 56 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 22.791 Bewertungen
56von 100
Kitchen Stories was a strong editorial app with video recipes, but after a series of updates the videos disappeared, saved recipes break, and users are pushed toward a paid upgrade. The content is good, but the product is degrading.
Gelobt: Varied and inventive recipes with polished presentation; the cooking mode is easy to use.
Kritik: Saved recipes can become locked after an update without warning; video instructions have disappeared.
Für wen: Culinary enthusiasts willing to tolerate instability
Platz 31. Wert aus Rezensionen: 56 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.431 Bewertungen
56von 100
The best tool for saving recipes from social media: Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook posts are parsed into structured recipes. However, the app goes down periodically and family sharing requires a separate subscription.
Gelobt: Flawless saving of recipes from social media videos and posts with automatic ingredient parsing.
Kritik: Family use is not accommodated: a second person must pay a separate subscription.
Für wen: People who actively save recipes from TikTok and Instagram and want quick access to them
Platz 32. Wert aus Rezensionen: 56 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.229 Bewertungen
56von 100
A visually appealing meal planner with straightforward dish entry and a convenient shopping list. The main gap: ingredients are not automatically transferred to the list when a recipe is added to the calendar, and planning multiple weeks costs money.
Gelobt: Beautiful design and simple dish entry make using the app a daily habit.
Kritik: Collaborative plan editing is not available for families — only view access via a shared link.
Für wen: Someone who wants to plan meals visually without complexity
Platz 33. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 432.467 Bewertungen
55von 100
Video recipes focused on simplicity and visual appeal from BuzzFeed. The strong point is that the video format lowers the barrier to cooking, but cross-device sync does not work, dietary filters ignore allergens, and sessions do not persist between launches.
Gelobt: Video instructions make even unfamiliar dishes approachable and take the fear out of the kitchen.
Kritik: Dietary filters do not actually work: the app continues showing recipes that contain specified allergens.
Für wen: Cooking beginners who need video format instead of written instructions
Platz 34. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 2.484 Bewertungen
55von 100
Before version 3.0 it was one of the best recipe managers, but the redesign broke familiar workflows and introduced instability. Social media import is still convenient; everything else has degraded.
Gelobt: URL import and Instagram recipe saving work instantly and accurately.
Kritik: After the major update, navigation became more confusing and the shopping list is unreliable.
Für wen: People who frequently save recipes from the web and can tolerate instability
Platz 35. Wert aus Rezensionen: 54 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 6.772 Bewertungen
54von 100
A clean meal-reminder timer for people who forget to eat. It does one thing well, but Apple Watch notifications do not work properly and stability drops after updates.
Gelobt: Simplicity and flexible meal scheduling without calorie counting or diet culture.
Kritik: Notifications do not reach the watch and do not let you log a meal without opening the app.
Für wen: People with a suppressed appetite or a packed schedule who forget to eat
Platz 36. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 52.032 Bewertungen
52von 100
eMeals conveniently connects a meal plan to online grocery ordering, but the shopping list often duplicates ingredients, recipes are criticized for lacking seasoning and variety, and the app is rough on tablet. It pushes Walmart at every launch.
Gelobt: One tap sends the shopping list directly to a partner store cart.
Kritik: The shopping list duplicates ingredients; recipes taste flat without extra seasoning.
Für wen: Busy families who want to cook on a schedule and order groceries online
Platz 37. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.649 Bewertungen
52von 100
A good recipe library with a step-by-step cooking mode, but clipboard import is unstable, search returns irrelevant results, and a heavy Walmart tie-in frustrates part of the audience.
Gelobt: Step-by-step cooking mode with an image at each step and a large curated recipe base.
Kritik: Search fails to find obvious dishes, and URL recipe import breaks without explanation.
Für wen: People who want to cook from structured recipes with visual cues
Platz 38. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 573 Bewertungen
52von 100
A simple planner with fast recipe import and a basic shopping list, but cross-device sync fails and recipes sometimes disappear from the dropdown. It works for those who need the bare minimum.
Gelobt: Quickly generates a shopping list from planned dishes and is easy to share with a partner.
Kritik: The shopping list cannot be checked off item by item while walking through the store.
Für wen: Couples who plan meals for the week together
Platz 39. Wert aus Rezensionen: 51 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 8.158 Bewertungen
51von 100
A convenient personal recipe organizer with social media import and a link back to the original video, but there is no weekly planner, Instagram and Facebook import often freezes, and app stability declined after recent updates.
Gelobt: Saves video recipes together with a working link to the original rather than just the text.
Kritik: No built-in weekly meal planner, even though users explicitly request exactly that feature.
Für wen: Cooking enthusiasts who collect recipes from social media
Platz 40. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 82.058 Bewertungen
48von 100
A combined app for short workouts and meal planning. The meal planner and ready menus have delivered real results for long-term users, but the app is frozen in development: Google sign-in is broken, Apple Health integration is absent, and no new recipes are added.
Gelobt: Ready weekly menus with simple recipes and short workouts complement each other naturally inside one app.
Kritik: The app has not evolved in years: Google login does not work and there is no Apple Health sync.
Für wen: People who want to combine short home workouts with a ready meal plan
Platz 41. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 15.429 Bewertungen
48von 100
Fitia works as a calorie tracker with automatic meal plan generation and the core product functions. But the barcode scanner is unreliable, macros in saved recipes change on their own, and AI food recognition needs improvement.
Gelobt: Automatically builds a meal plan based on available foods and body composition goals.
Kritik: Saved recipes change their calorie and macro values without reason; the scanner is unreliable.
Für wen: Spanish-speaking users tracking their diet and weight
Platz 42. Wert aus Rezensionen: 46 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 7.302 Bewertungen
46von 100
A large global community and simple recipe publishing, but search is limited to one language and region, browsing without a subscription is awkward, and useful navigation features were removed in recent updates.
Gelobt: Sharing your own recipe with an international community and getting comments from cooks in other countries.
Kritik: The app blocks access to recipes from other countries and languages, even though the website has no such restrictions.
Für wen: Cooking enthusiasts who want to share recipes with a global community
Platz 43. Wert aus Rezensionen: 46 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 329 Bewertungen
46von 100
A beautiful and intuitive recipe manager with import from browser, screenshots, and cookbook photos. After an update, basic features like categories ended up behind a paywall, and some users lost recipes with no way to restore them.
Gelobt: Import works from many sources: browser, Facebook, screenshots, and book photos.
Kritik: Cooking mode does not let you adjust the text size while actively cooking.
Für wen: People who want to transfer family recipes from paper to their phone
Platz 44. Wert aus Rezensionen: 45 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 32.761 Bewertungen
45von 100
Home Chef earns praise for meal quality and variety, but the app itself is unstable: it freezes at launch, loses selected items when editing an order, and recipes from physical cards cannot be accessed through the app. Choosing meals for the week involves friction.
Gelobt: A complete ingredient kit with clear recipes lets you cook new dishes without a special trip for spices.
Kritik: The app freezes at launch and does not save order changes; recipe cards from the box are inaccessible through it.
Für wen: Busy households who need to cook quickly without planning their own grocery run
Platz 45. Wert aus Rezensionen: 45 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 914 Bewertungen
45von 100
A simple recipe store with web import and automatic ingredient suggestions, but with no cross-Apple-device sync. After recent updates, users encountered intrusive ads overlaying the interface even in the paid version.
Gelobt: Fast recipe import from a website and automatic ingredient assembly for the shopping list.
Kritik: No account login or cloud sync, so recipes are not accessible across different devices.
Für wen: A single iPhone user who needs a simple personal recipe store
Platz 46. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 87.706 Bewertungen
44von 100
A nutrition tracker with a meal planner and Apple Health integration. Long-term users appreciate its simplicity, but a recent update removed gram-based logging, alienating anyone who tracks macros precisely and breaking the core workflow.
Gelobt: Apple Health sync and a clean interface with no unnecessary steps work well for daily tracking.
Kritik: After the latest update, quantities can only be entered in vague portions rather than grams, making tracking imprecise.
Für wen: People just starting to monitor their diet who do not need detailed weight-based tracking
Platz 47. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 41.625 Bewertungen
44von 100
Blue Apron as a service delivers interesting recipes and good ingredient quality, but the app became less convenient after a redesign: current week recipes are harder to find, the planning horizon shrunk to two weeks, and step-by-step instructions during cooking got worse. Users rate the service higher than the app.
Gelobt: Recipe cards with step-by-step instructions help you master new dishes without searching for recipes.
Kritik: After the redesign it is hard to find this week's recipes and switch between upcoming deliveries in advance.
Für wen: Experienced home cooks who value variety in their meal kit delivery
Platz 48. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 13.932 Bewertungen
44von 100
BigOven has built a large recipe base over the years, but the app is now crumbling from within: cooking instructions are buried behind ads, recipe folders sort in a random order, and family sharing does not work properly.
Gelobt: A huge recipe base and the ability to maintain a personal collection with folders over many years.
Kritik: Ads cover instructions right in the middle of cooking; folders sort in a random order.
Für wen: Users with a large accumulated collection who have nowhere else to go
Platz 49. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 11.811 Bewertungen
44von 100
A specialized macro and meal-timing coach for athletes, not a general recipe planner. After a redesign, navigation became so complex that even loyal users gave up on daily tracking.
Gelobt: A clear RP-method nutrition structure with automatic macro adjustment for training days.
Kritik: After the redesign the interface is overwhelming: hidden features, logged data loss, and no way to quickly log a meal.
Für wen: Athletes following RP periodized nutrition
Platz 50. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 3.670 Bewertungen
44von 100
Social media video recipe import works when it works, but it is unstable. Free-tier limits feel like a wall, and accounts with hundreds of recipes disappear after updates.
Gelobt: Saving recipes directly from TikTok and Instagram with automatic ingredient extraction.
Kritik: Serving scaling is complicated and changing the number of guests requires too many steps.
Für wen: Fans of culinary social content who want to collect recipes in one place
Platz 51. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 1.081 Bewertungen
44von 100
A convenient local recipe store with 15 years of history, but sync between iPhone and iPad has been broken for a long time, and an iOS 26 update wiped data for some users. Recipe entry and viewing work well as long as the data is still there.
Gelobt: Simple and fast entry of your own recipes with everything stored in one place.
Kritik: Transferring recipes between devices via Bluetooth or local network is unreliable and often fails entirely.
Für wen: Someone who prefers to keep personal recipes on a single device without cloud storage
Platz 52. Wert aus Rezensionen: 44 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 343 Bewertungen
44von 100
The core idea is good: save a TikTok or Instagram link and get a step-by-step recipe with a shopping list. In practice, import freezes or fails every other attempt, and some users lost all their data after an update.
Gelobt: The only app that can parse recipes from TikTok and Instagram videos without manual entry.
Kritik: No categories or folders for recipes; everything piles into one unorganized list.
Für wen: People who collect recipes from short-form video
Platz 53. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 12.303 Bewertungen
42von 100
Oh She Glows offers quality vegan recipes with beautiful photos, but the app has not been updated in a long time, the content is frozen, and it is technically unstable — recipes sometimes fail to load at all.
Gelobt: The recipes taste good even for non-vegans; the presentation is attractive and navigation is simple.
Kritik: No shopping list, no planner, and content has not been updated in over a year.
Für wen: Vegans familiar with the blog who want the recipes available offline
Platz 54. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 11.112 Bewertungen
42von 100
A simple recipe organizer with convenient browser and camera saving, but a widespread problem with loading recipes from iCloud makes the app unreliable for daily kitchen use.
Gelobt: One-tap import from any website and OCR of cookbook pages directly from the camera.
Kritik: iCloud recipes stop opening and the app must be relaunched multiple times in the middle of cooking.
Für wen: People who want to store a recipe collection from multiple sources
Platz 55. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.648 Bewertungen
42von 100
This is a ready meal delivery service with a companion app, not a recipe planner. Reviews are primarily about logistics and food quality rather than planning features. The companion app is unstable.
Gelobt: Fast delivery of ready healthy meals with a personalized diet option.
Kritik: The menu repeats too often and variety does not match what is advertised.
Für wen: Residents of UAE and Qatar ordering ready diet meals with delivery
Platz 56. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 1.261 Bewertungen
42von 100
A veteran meal planner with a long history that is now running without support: printing crashes the app, barcode scanning finds nothing, and cross-device sync is unreliable. The core manual meal planning works, but everything around it is falling apart.
Gelobt: Flexible manual meal planning with grocery budgeting and custom categories.
Kritik: Recipe import from websites is broken, and an unmaintained app is gradually losing iOS compatibility.
Für wen: A longtime fan of the app who has nowhere else to go
Platz 57. Wert aus Rezensionen: 41 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 7.121 Bewertungen
41von 100
Content from real professional chefs at a high level, but search and tags are poorly implemented, video lessons cannot be saved with progress, and the app becomes very slow after extended use.
Gelobt: Techniques and recipes from working chefs that you cannot find on mainstream cooking platforms.
Kritik: Search and tags work erratically: there is no way to filter free content from paid or find recipes by technique.
Für wen: Professional chefs and culinary school students
Platz 58. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 867.309 Bewertungen
38von 100
A weight-loss app with coaching and nutrition tracking that is only tangentially related to recipes and meal planning. The bulk of reviews document constant loading failures, intrusive gamification with virtual seeds, and a bloated interface after updates.
Gelobt: When it works without crashes, it genuinely helps with weight loss through a psychological approach and calorie tracking.
Kritik: The interface is overloaded with animations and game mechanics that get in the way of quickly logging a meal.
Für wen: People who want structured weight-loss coaching, not just recipes
Platz 59. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 31.146 Bewertungen
38von 100
CHEF iQ is aimed at controlling a smart thermometer and connected devices, not meal planning. Recipes in the app are tied to the hardware and cover a narrow range of scenarios. After a redesign the interface got worse and device connection is unstable.
Gelobt: Precise temperature control with flip prompts makes grilling predictable.
Kritik: After the update the interface became more complex; recipes are limited to compatible equipment and do not cover regular cooking.
Für wen: Owners of CHEF iQ smart thermometers who need cooking temperature control
Platz 60. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 13.807 Bewertungen
38von 100
RecipeBox worked well as a personal recipe archive with web import, but after monetization the product degraded: intrusive Walmart ads appear on every screen transition, and import now saves only a link instead of the actual content.
Gelobt: One-click recipe import from the web and convenient manual organization by category.
Kritik: Import increasingly saves only a link rather than the recipe itself, making the collection dependent on third-party sites.
Für wen: Anyone who wants to store recipes in one place without planning features
Platz 61. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 7.949 Bewertungen
38von 100
Good, varied recipes every week, but this is a companion app to a physical delivery service where the real problems are spoiled ingredients and incomplete boxes. The iPad app does not rotate to landscape.
Gelobt: The weekly recipe rotation genuinely does not repeat, which even critical users appreciate.
Kritik: The step-by-step cooking mode breaks periodically, and the iPad app only works in portrait orientation.
Für wen: Marley Spoon subscribers who need a digital recipe card
Platz 62. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 6.157 Bewertungen
38von 100
The app as a meal kit interface is reasonably convenient, but the Start Cooking button stopped working after an update, making step-by-step mode inaccessible. The core product experience issue lies outside the app: wrong and spoiled ingredients in the box.
Gelobt: A wide selection of vegetarian and family recipes with clear step-by-step instructions.
Kritik: The Start Cooking button stopped working after an update; step-by-step mode is unavailable.
Für wen: Busy families who need a ready ingredient kit with simple recipes
Platz 63. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 2.163 Bewertungen
38von 100
Automatic meal planning that works for Whole30 and AIP, but the app runs slowly, allergen filters are unreliable, and the algorithm generates repetitive menus without enough variety.
Gelobt: Automatically assembles a plan and grocery list for the chosen dietary protocol.
Kritik: The algorithm cycles through the same recipes repeatedly; menu variety is extremely limited.
Für wen: People doing Whole30 or AIP who want a ready plan without choosing meals themselves
Platz 64. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 1.405 Bewertungen
38von 100
The app offers a simple daily meal plan without frills, but that is where the positives end. There are no macros, the meal-swap filter does not work by meal type, and the shopping list deletes unchecked items.
Gelobt: A clear daily meal schedule with no extra screens or decisions required.
Kritik: No diet customization: you cannot swap a dish by meal type or save a recipe you like without adding it to the plan.
Für wen: A beginner to Mediterranean eating who needs the simplest possible starting point
Platz 65. Wert aus Rezensionen: 34 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 24.028 Bewertungen
34von 100
Green Chef is a meal kit delivery service, not a recipe app. The app itself is basic, and the key user pain points are navigation through the menu and the absence of a favorites filter.
Gelobt: Recipes are clear and quick to follow; the food is good according to users who actually got to the kitchen.
Kritik: No persistent diet filter; there is no normal way to find a liked dish again later.
Für wen: Green Chef service customers, not for independent meal planning
Platz 66. Wert aus Rezensionen: 32 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 219.296 Bewertungen
32von 100
A companion app to a meal kit delivery service. The culinary content itself is good, but the app chronically fails: it does not save meal selections, sends random menus, ignores allergens, and crashes regularly after updates.
Gelobt: Step-by-step instructions help you cook dishes that used to feel too difficult.
Kritik: Weekly meal selections are not saved and the app sends random menus instead of the ones you chose.
Für wen: HelloFresh subscribers who need to manage their orders, not people looking for recipes
Platz 67. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 48.806 Bewertungen
30von 100
HitMeal presents itself as a calorie tracker rather than a recipe planner: the barcode scanner is unreliable, there is no cross-device sync, and meal planning features are minimal. As a recipe and meal planning tool it is weaker than competitors.
Gelobt: A simple interface for starting out with calorie and macro tracking with no learning curve.
Kritik: The barcode scanner is unreliable; data does not sync between phone and tablet.
Für wen: Calorie-counting beginners who do not need a full meal planner
Platz 68. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 99.223 Bewertungen
28von 100
A recipe library from Condé Nast with content from Bon Appétit and other publications. The recipes are good quality, but the app regularly freezes at launch, fails to open for a large share of users, dietary filters do not work, and saved recipe organization is entirely absent.
Gelobt: High-quality editorial content from Bon Appétit with useful user comments beneath each recipe.
Kritik: No folders or search within saved recipes — a long flat list with no structure is unusable.
Für wen: Condé Nast subscribers who want access to Bon Appétit content
Platz 69. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 29.349 Bewertungen
28von 100
The app offers a keto recipe collection, but saved favorites do not persist between sessions, the interface is unstable, and a full meal planner is effectively absent. Technical problems substantially undercut the value of the content.
Gelobt: A wide selection of keto recipes with clear instructions that helps beginners get started on the diet.
Kritik: Saved recipes reset after closing the app; the meal planning feature is almost completely absent.
Für wen: People just starting keto who need ready recipes to get going
Platz 70. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 1.921 Bewertungen
28von 100
Meal plans without detailed recipes and with questionable dish compositions; functionality is limited. A significant share of five-star reviews was obtained through incentivization.
Gelobt: Simple onboarding with personalization to your goal and lifestyle.
Kritik: Meal plans without step-by-step recipes or proper proportions; date navigation is awkward.
Für wen: Practically no one who actually wants to cook to a plan
Platz 71. Wert aus Rezensionen: 25 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 25.572 Bewertungen
25von 100
Anova Culinary functions as sous vide device control; the recipe and guide section became unstable after recent updates. For most users the Guides section crashes on every open, and reconnecting the device is required every session.
Gelobt: Remote start and temperature monitoring for sous vide via the phone works accurately with a stable connection.
Kritik: The guides and recipes section crashes on every open; device reconnection is required at every session.
Für wen: Anova circulator owners who need temperature control without recipe planning
Platz 72. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 10.021 Bewertungen
22von 100
The app blocks access to its own recipes with a long, unskippable onboarding sequence, and most positive reviews are empty. Recipes are decent in concept but do not scale to a real number of servings.
Gelobt: A visually clean interface and a reasonable selection of quick recipes for those who actually reach the content.
Kritik: Recipes do not show a serving count and cannot be scaled, so there is no way to adapt them to a real number of people.
Für wen: Hard to recommend to anyone in the current state
Platz 73. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,0★ · 3.013 Bewertungen
22von 100
A slow cooker recipe collection with an extremely unreliable access system: users pay for premium and cannot open the recipes. There is no meaningful meal planning or shopping list functionality.
Gelobt: Some slow cooker recipes are practical and work for busy parents.
Kritik: Category navigation loses your position in the list and randomly jumps to a different part of the catalog.
Für wen: Slow cooker owners who need a basic recipe set without extra features
Platz 74. Wert aus Rezensionen: 22 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 766 Bewertungen
22von 100
The app regularly loses all saved recipes after updates or re-login, and import is unreliable and often drops partway through to system settings. The product is too raw and unreliable to serve as a recipe store.
Gelobt: The idea of importing recipes directly from Instagram and TikTok via the share sheet is appealing.
Kritik: Recipes disappear after an app update or plan change; there is no backup option.
Platz 75. Wert aus Rezensionen: 18 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,3★ · 6.912 Bewertungen
18von 100
The app offers a limited recipe set and does not allow adding your own dishes. There is almost no product value; users cannot properly plan meals or maintain their own diet.
Gelobt: A few ready recipes look appealing and prompt users to start thinking about healthy eating.
Kritik: You cannot add your own dish to the plan; only recipes from the app's built-in library are allowed.
Für wen: Beginners who need ready meal ideas without any flexibility
Platz 76. Wert aus Rezensionen: 8 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 477 Bewertungen
8von 100
The app does not open for most users, support is silent, and the recipes do not follow the spirit of Whole30. There is almost no functional meal planning here.
Gelobt: A few users note tasty and simple recipes when the app actually works.
Kritik: No way to add sides or accompaniments to dishes; recipes do not combine into a complete meal.
Für wen: Not recommended to anyone in the current state
Platz 77. Wert aus Rezensionen: 3 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 2,5★ · 412 Bewertungen
3von 100
The app impersonates the well-known Allrecipes website, charges money, and does not open any recipes. Actual Allrecipes representatives publicly confirmed they have no connection to this app.
Gelobt: Users who got a refund through Apple at least managed to resolve the issue through store support.
Kritik: Recipe search does not work at all; there is almost no content inside.
Für wen: No one
Zu den Bewertungen
Zwei Bewertungen — zwei Quellen
Sie helfen beim Vergleich von Apps, ersetzen aber nicht die Prüfung der eigenen Aufgabe.
Rezensionsbewertung · bis 100
Die gespeicherte Bewertung aus der inApp-Recherche zu den Rezensionstexten. Sie beurteilt die App im Archiv insgesamt, nicht die Zuverlässigkeit einer einzelnen Funktion.
Store-Bewertung · bis 5
Die Bewertung von der App-Seite zum Zeitpunkt der Datenerhebung. Aktuelle Bewertung und Version können abweichen.
In der archivierten Stichprobe dieses Themas: 77 Apps und 22.822 gelesene Rezensionen. Das ist der Gesamtumfang der Recherche, nicht die Zahl der Rezensionen pro App.
Ein Abstand zwischen den Bewertungen beweist keine Manipulation. Das Datum der Berechnung und die vollständige Methodik der Bewertung sind nicht im mobilen Archiv. Vergleich die Aufgabenbeschreibungen und die Originalzitate und prüf die Bedingungen in der aktuellen Version.
