Note des avis : 68 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 4 084 833 notes
68sur 100
Chick-fil-A's own mobile ordering app with a strong loyalty program and consistently high in-store service. The main complaint isn't delivery, it's aggressive marketing notifications: the opt-out setting doesn't work, forcing users to block all app notifications entirely.
Points forts
Consistent in-store service quality and a convenient points-earning system through the app.
Reproches
Notification settings are broken: promotional pushes keep arriving after being disabled in settings, leaving users no choice but to block the app altogether.
Pour qui : Regular Chick-fil-A guests who want to earn points and order ahead to skip the line
Note des avis : 68 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 54 763 notes
68sur 100
Food quality is consistently high, and the app generally handles mobile pre-ordering well. Limited customization and occasional technical glitches cut into the experience slightly, but the core works.
Points forts
Ordering through the app genuinely speeds things up: you pick up your food hot, right when it's ready.
Reproches
Customizing dishes for dietary needs, allergies, bun swaps, isn't always available.
Pour qui : Regular Habit Burger guests who value speed and burger quality
Note des avis : 67 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 33 191 notes
67sur 100
Wegmans Meals 2GO handles supermarket pre-orders for pickup and gets orders ready on time, but the app doesn't communicate real-time order status or send email confirmation, leaving users to call in manually.
Points forts
Reserving subs and prepared food in advance works reliably and saves time on busy days.
Reproches
Menu customization is limited: you can't specify bread size, request sauce on the side, or choose a pizza crust type.
Pour qui : Regular Wegmans shoppers who plan lunch or dinner ahead of time
Rang 4. Note des avis : 66 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 103 574 notes
66sur 100
Golden Corral as a buffet concept, with wide selection and friendly staff, works consistently, and guests come back. The app is weak: account login breaks right when you try to redeem a reward, though the restaurant itself is rated well.
Points forts : A large variety of hot dishes and attentive staff make the visit worthwhile.
Reproches : The rewards program is technically unstable, login blocks you precisely when you need to redeem points.
Pour qui : Families and older guests who value variety at a fixed price
Rang 5. Note des avis : 63 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 530 469 notes
63sur 100
The anti-food-waste concept genuinely works, and most users get good products at a steep discount. The main weaknesses: bots snap up popular bags within seconds, and if the store is closed at pickup time, support offers little help.
Points forts : The ability to get quality food at a heavily discounted price while reducing food waste.
Reproches : Automated resellers reserve bags faster than a regular user can tap the button.
Pour qui : Conscious shoppers with flexible schedules and pickup points nearby
Rang 6. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 1 495 708 notes
62sur 100
Pizza arrives hot and on time, and the basic ordering flow works without surprises for most users. Some friction: intrusive promotional banners when opening the app, and occasional promotional offers that don't apply automatically.
Points forts : Pizza consistently arrives hot and within the stated time window.
Reproches : Promotional banners at app launch can't be dismissed instantly.
Pour qui : Families who regularly order pizza at home
Rang 7. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 250 693 notes
62sur 100
Gopuff built a convenient express delivery model from its own warehouses, which means consistently fast fulfillment in normal conditions. But when things go wrong, a courier goes unassigned with no warning, and support only offers a chatbot with no real resolution.
Points forts : Fast delivery of snacks, drinks, and everyday essentials in under 30 minutes when a courier is available.
Reproches : The app doesn't warn you if no courier is assigned by the time the warehouse closes, the order just gets cancelled.
Pour qui : City dwellers who need small purchases right now without a trip to the store
Rang 8. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 127 378 notes
62sur 100
Beyond Menu does well as a storefront for local restaurants, and users find ordering easy. However, tracking breaks at critical moments, and courier delays of 30 to 60 minutes appear often enough to be a systemic issue.
Points forts : A clean interface and direct access to a favorite local restaurant without extra intermediaries.
Reproches : Delivery tracking is unreliable exactly when the order is running late and you need it most.
Pour qui : Regulars at a few favorite local restaurants who want a convenient way to order online
Rang 9. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 33 661 notes
62sur 100
Dodo maintains high standards for pizza quality and speed, and brand fans stay loyal even through app glitches. The main weakness is that the nearest location's menu doesn't always match what the customer wants.
Points forts : Pizza is consistently good, delivery is fast, and couriers are called out individually for being polite.
Reproches : You can't choose a specific restaurant for your order, the app switches addresses on its own, leading to unexpected substitutions.
Pour qui : A dedicated Dodo fan who values the product more than app convenience
Rang 10. Note des avis : 60 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 1 429 314 notes
60sur 100
Wings are consistently praised for taste and quality, that's the brand's main asset. The app generally works, but periodically suffers widespread payment failures that block orders for many users at once.
Points forts : Consistently good wings and a wide sauce selection.
Reproches : No order tracking after placing an order.
Rang 11. Note des avis : 60 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 133 921 notes
60sur 100
Shipt stands out for the quality of its live shoppers, they communicate, suggest substitutes, and treat orders with care. The main issues aren't the service itself but app instability after updates and shopper shortages during peak hours.
Points forts : Shoppers communicate in real time, confirm substitutes, and sometimes show genuine care for your order.
Reproches : When shoppers are scarce, orders get rescheduled multiple times with no notification, and you can't cancel through the app, you have to call.
Pour qui : People who want a live assistant with their shopping, not just a delivery
Rang 12. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 1 528 532 notes
58sur 100
Jimmy John's reputation is built on speed, and when the app works, your order really is ready fast. The problem is delivery accuracy: the wrong address sometimes gets pre-filled, there's no courier tracking, and no estimated arrival time is shown.
Points forts : The ability to place an order ahead and pick it up without waiting at the counter.
Reproches : No courier tracking and no estimated arrival time for the order.
Pour qui : Office workers who want to grab a sandwich at lunch without standing in line
Rang 13. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 39 473 notes
58sur 100
The concept of ordering from multiple restaurants in one delivery works, and the food is generally high quality. But in some cases delivery runs twice as long as estimated, and support doesn't offer a real fix. The pickup flow is unreliable.
Points forts : The ability to order dishes from different cuisines in a single delivery, great for families with different tastes.
Reproches : Contacting the courier or changing delivery instructions after placing an order isn't possible.
Pour qui : Families and groups with different food preferences sharing one order
Rang 14. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 32 761 notes
58sur 100
Home Chef reliably delivers quality meal kits with recipes, and busy households appreciate it, but the service occasionally fails to maintain proper temperature during delivery, and the app freezes on the launch screen and won't let you browse recipes inside.
Points forts : Oven-ready kits with all ingredients prepped are valued for cutting out routine without sacrificing freshness.
Reproches : Meal selections don't always save: orders can silently revert to default items.
Pour qui : Busy families who want to cook at home but don't have time to plan meals
Rang 15. Note des avis : 57 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 24 028 notes
57sur 100
Green Chef delivers varied kits with well-designed recipes, and most users are happy with the food quality. The weak spot is inconsistent vegetable freshness and inflexible organic filtering in the app.
Points forts : Recipes are straightforward, clear, and let you put a solid dinner on the table in 30 minutes.
Reproches : Organic filtering is rudimentary: you have to select organic options manually each week, there's no global preference setting.
Pour qui : Busy adults who want to cook at home but don't have time to plan meals
Rang 16. Note des avis : 56 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 92 759 notes
56sur 100
Publix Delivery works well when you get a good shopper who finds substitutes and stays in touch. But updates regularly break core features: approving substitutions, applying deals, and notifications that turn into a flood of SMS every 90 seconds.
Points forts : Real-time chat with the shopper and the ability to influence substitutions is genuinely convenient.
Reproches : After every update, one or more basic features stop working, and shopper assignment can take over 40 minutes.
Pour qui : Publix shoppers with limited mobility or packed schedules who need delivery from their preferred store
Rang 17. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 1 696 579 notes
55sur 100
The main scenario, ordering a favorite item, earning points, quick pickup, works reliably for most users. The weak point is that the app defaults to the last-used location rather than the nearest one, and several users have accidentally placed orders at a restaurant in another city.
Points forts : Points accumulation and fast drive-thru pickup via Chipotlane without touching the register.
Reproches : The app doesn't suggest the nearest restaurant by default and gives no warning when the selected location is unusually far away.
Pour qui : Chipotle fans who have a regular location near home or work
Rang 18. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 251 792 notes
55sur 100
Cava earns genuine admiration for its food, but the app frustrates: order history is buried deep, the cart resets when you try to apply a reward, and duplicating a dish isn't possible. Loyalty is held by the kitchen, not the interface.
Points forts : Fresh, generous bowls with flexible options for plant-based eating.
Reproches : Reordering a favorite item takes five steps instead of one, and the cart resets when you try to edit it.
Pour qui : Mediterranean food fans who already know what they want to order
Rang 19. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 175 004 notes
55sur 100
The Jack in the Box app handles basic ordering but cuts customization short: you can't add toppings, choose a drink with a combo, or stack multiple deals in one order. Frequent sign-outs frustrate regular customers.
Points forts : The ability to build an order in advance and pick it up at the drive-thru window without waiting.
Reproches : In-app item customization is stripped compared to the register: you can only remove ingredients, not add them.
Pour qui : Regular Jack in the Box guests who prioritize speed
Rang 20. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 124 564 notes
55sur 100
The pizza at Blaze is genuinely good and earns sincere praise, but the app regularly fails when you try to use earned points or request a compensation on a delivery that went wrong. Reordering goes smoothly when everything is ideal, any deviation breaks the system.
Points forts : Fresh ingredients and fast prep make the pizza consistently good.
Reproches : There's no way to contact the restaurant directly when an ingredient shows as unavailable in the app but is actually in stock.
Pour qui : Blaze Pizza regulars who order from a standard recipe and pick up in person
Rang 21. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 22 806 notes
55sur 100
Snap Kitchen offers tasty prepared meals with delivery, and regulars appreciate the convenience. After a recent redesign, navigation broke on iPhone 14, the back button is hidden behind the status bar and can't be tapped.
Points forts : Prepared meals with a solid protein balance in a convenient format for busy people.
Reproches : The menu doesn't rotate fast enough: long-term subscribers get tired of the same items.
Pour qui : Health-focused eaters with no time to cook, in cities where the brand operates
Rang 22. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 17 942 notes
55sur 100
People love the service itself, tasty chef-made food and a good selection. The app, however, runs into trouble: it freezes, doesn't respond when adding dishes, and is overloaded with interface elements.
Points forts : A wide selection of dishes from different chefs, with the ability to flag ingredients you don't like.
Reproches : There's no reminder before an order is automatically sent, and cancelling one is extremely difficult.
Pour qui : Busy people who want to eat well and varied at home without cooking
Rang 23. Note des avis : 54 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 132 750 notes
54sur 100
Zomato works reliably in major Indian cities, but support floods users with templated responses for months, and order completeness remains a lottery. Delivery holds up when the address matches the pin, and loses packages or cancels orders without explanation when it doesn't.
Points forts : A wide restaurant selection and email login make it convenient for travelers.
Reproches : Support is essentially unreachable: real questions about order errors sit unresolved for months.
Pour qui : Residents of major Indian cities who are willing to tolerate inconsistent support for the wide selection
Rang 24. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 4 646 364 notes
52sur 100
A grocery delivery service with a personal shopper who chats and agrees on substitutes in real time. Quality depends heavily on the individual shopper: some are attentive and punctual, others ignore instructions and leave bags on the floor without a call.
Points forts : Live communication with the shopper during picking and the ability to swap unavailable items on the spot.
Reproches : Service quality is entirely determined by the assigned shopper, with no way to request a proven one.
Pour qui : Busy people who need groceries delivered without a trip to the store
Rang 25. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 1 782 694 notes
52sur 100
The app lets you pre-order and skip the queue, and when it works the experience is good. But navigation asks you to set a location multiple times in a row, and customization options like sauces and ice level aren't exposed in the app.
Points forts : Convenient pre-ordering with quick pickup without waiting in line.
Reproches : You can't specify how much ice you want or which sauce to include directly in the order.
Pour qui : Regular Wendy's guests who want to pick up without standing in line
Rang 26. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 124 364 notes
52sur 100
Yango operates across dozens of countries with varying service levels: in some cities drivers are polite and punctual, in others they routinely decline rides, ask for extra payment, or simply don't show up. Maps are inaccurate, and there's no courier contact during food delivery.
Points forts : In cities with a strong driver fleet, rides are comfortable and fast.
Reproches : Maps route through roads that don't exist, forcing you to give directions to the driver manually.
Pour qui : Users in Africa and the Middle East where alternatives are limited
Rang 27. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 28 002 notes
52sur 100
The QuikTrip convenience store app works well for coupons and quick in-store food, but authentication periodically breaks and pump payment is unstable. The product itself, food in the store, draws almost no complaints.
Points forts : Real discounts on fuel and food, with straightforward points earning.
Reproches : The food menu is limited by the gas station format and hasn't expanded in response to requests from regulars.
Pour qui : Regular QuikTrip customers who want to fill up and grab a bite without waiting in line
Rang 28. Note des avis : 50 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 157 314 notes
50sur 100
The Carl's Jr. app is handy for basic ordering and loads quickly, but the rewards system is unreliable: coupons often get rejected or disappear after a failed checkout, and at night many restaurants don't accept mobile orders. You also can't add ingredients to an item.
Points forts : Fast checkout for a favorite burger with basic modifications and pickup straight at the window.
Reproches : You can't add an ingredient to a menu item, only remove one, making in-app customization less capable than the register.
Pour qui : Regular Carl's Jr. guests who order the same thing each time
Rang 29. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 456 789 notes
48sur 100
The app handles ordering and points accumulation, but in-restaurant order accuracy is low: missing items are a recurring issue. Delivery tracking is confusing and doesn't notify you when the order arrives.
Points forts : Promos and discounts through the app genuinely add up for regular customers.
Reproches : You can't cancel or modify an order yourself after confirming, you have to wait for support to respond.
Rang 30. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 237 228 notes
48sur 100
The Applebee's app lets you place a to-go order, but the menu is poorly organized: some dishes are hard to find in the logical section, side substitutions aren't available, and payment is accepted in limited formats. Portion sizes at pickup differ from dine-in, which frustrates regular guests.
Points forts : Food is fresh and hot at pickup, and the price is noticeably better than fast food.
Reproches : You can't swap a side dish or add special requests when ordering through the app.
Pour qui : Regular Applebee's guests who want to grab their usual order without waiting in line
Rang 31. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 27 191 notes
48sur 100
Foodsby solves a specific problem, a scheduled office lunch, but late arrivals and last-minute cancellations undermine exactly what the service was designed to do. The restaurant selection is gradually shrinking.
Points forts : Convenient for corporate orders within a set work window: one order, a fixed pickup time.
Reproches : The partner restaurant pool is shrinking, and new locations aren't being added.
Pour qui : Office workers with a set lunch break in cities where the service operates
Rang 32. Note des avis : 47 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 581 168 notes
47sur 100
Orders go through fine, food is ready on time and tastes consistent, but applying rewards at checkout often throws an error, and menu navigation isn't intuitive on the first try.
Points forts : The food at the restaurant is predictably the same visit after visit.
Reproches : The in-app rewards system behaves erratically: points accumulate, but spending them at the register doesn't work.
Pour qui : Regular customers who know the menu by heart
Rang 33. Note des avis : 47 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 18 528 notes
47sur 100
The app handles basic tasks, but the loyalty program is unreliable: points disappear or don't apply. Regular guests feel the food quality has declined.
Points forts : Simple, clear ordering flow with no unnecessary steps.
Reproches : Customizing items within combo meals isn't supported.
Pour qui : People who know Smashburger and want to order quickly without extra steps
Rang 34. Note des avis : 46 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 248 600 notes
46sur 100
Grab dominates Southeast Asia through its combined taxi and food delivery coverage, but the algorithm sometimes deliberately slows service, drivers can cancel after accepting a ride, and the interface is cluttered with ads that get in the way of tracking your order. Batching multiple orders disrupts timing for each one.
Points forts : Works across almost every country in Southeast Asia, great for travelers.
Reproches : Drivers and couriers can cancel an accepted order without penalty, forcing you to wait for a new one.
Pour qui : Tourists and residents of Southeast Asia who want one app for transport and food
Rang 35. Note des avis : 46 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 41 625 notes
46sur 100
Long-term subscribers note a drop in quality after the ownership change: boxes ship with errors, and the app became harder to use after the redesign, especially on tablets. The concept and recipes are still well-liked, but reliability has fallen.
Points forts : Recipes are varied and designed for people who know how to cook and want to grow.
Reproches : After the redesign, the app hides key features and lacks a proper tablet layout.
Pour qui : Experienced home cooks willing to tolerate an awkward interface for quality recipes
Rang 36. Note des avis : 46 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 34 444 notes
46sur 100
Swiggy covers the basic food delivery need in a large market, but delivery time accuracy has dropped, support doesn't resolve incomplete order issues, and the batch delivery algorithm for small orders creates unacceptable delays.
Points forts : The family ordering feature for orders placed from abroad and new integrations like Dukaan are well-regarded by users.
Reproches : The small-order batching system sacrifices delivery speed without telling the customer.
Pour qui : Urban Indian users accustomed to delivery who are willing to accept variable timing
Rang 37. Note des avis : 46 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 17 355 notes
46sur 100
Long-term subscribers value the ingredient quality, but delivery reliability has dropped: roughly half of recent orders arrived late or not at all. The app periodically fails to load and won't let you edit your menu.
Points forts : Quality organic ingredients and clear recipes that make cooking enjoyable.
Reproches : You can't clear the auto-selected menu and build your box from scratch on your own.
Pour qui : Health-conscious people who enjoy cooking but don't want to spend time at the grocery store
Rang 38. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 786 960 notes
44sur 100
Little Caesars wins on speed and price, and when the portal ordering works correctly, pizza is ready in 15 minutes. Weak points: topping mismatch at pickup (too little cheese, wrong sauce) and the app reporting an order ready before it's actually been started.
Points forts : Fast pickup via the Hot-N-Ready portal without waiting at the register.
Reproches : The pizza that comes out sometimes doesn't match what was selected in the app.
Pour qui : Anyone who wants hot pizza in 15 minutes with no fuss
Rang 39. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 583 097 notes
44sur 100
The menu and ordering flow are clear enough, but Apple Pay fails for a significant share of users, and modifications to an already-placed order aren't possible. The food is consistently good, the app isn't to blame for that.
Points forts : The ability to schedule a pickup for a specific time in advance.
Reproches : You can't add an item or fix an order right after placing it, attempting to do so causes the app to freeze.
Rang 40. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 326 340 notes
44sur 100
Noon is strong as an electronics and goods marketplace, but the food delivery section is noticeably weaker: couriers run late, changing a delivery address is difficult, and some merchants sell counterfeit goods. Genuine orders from verified sellers go through without issues.
Points forts : Wide selection and convenient payment make it the region's top marketplace for part of the audience.
Reproches : Changing the delivery address after placing an order is nearly impossible, critical when you make a mistake.
Pour qui : Shoppers in the UAE and Saudi Arabia who know trusted sellers
Rang 41. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 289 974 notes
44sur 100
Yandex Go combines taxi, food, and delivery in one app, which is convenient, but support consistently fails to resolve disputes, and the interface is cluttered with ads and irrelevant sections. Delayed food couriers and boilerplate chat responses frustrate regulars.
Points forts : Wide city coverage and fast driver dispatch under normal conditions.
Reproches : The main screen is overloaded with ads and third-party services, which gets in the way of basic order scenarios.
Pour qui : Users in Russia and the CIS who want one app for taxi and food
Rang 42. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 156 770 notes
44sur 100
Toast is convenient for ordering at small restaurants, but the loyalty system is unreliable: restaurants appear in the rewards catalog without actually accepting them, and the platform lets you place an order at an already-closed venue without automatically refunding you.
Points forts : Brings hundreds of small local restaurants into one app, especially those with no ordering system of their own.
Reproches : The app doesn't check whether a restaurant is open before you place an order, which leads to lost money and waiting for nothing.
Pour qui : Fans of local restaurants and independent spots
Rang 43. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 91 111 notes
44sur 100
Sheetz makes good food, but the app is systematically unstable: menus fail to load, checkout freezes, and you can't split payment across multiple methods. Getting a refund for a missing or wrong order takes weeks and still ends with a gift card instead of a card refund.
Points forts : A varied menu with milkshakes, fried food, and hot dishes draws a loyal following.
Reproches : You can't initiate a refund for an order error through the app, the process drags on for weeks with no guaranteed outcome.
Pour qui : Sheetz fans who live near the chain and are willing to tolerate an unstable app for food they love
Rang 44. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 34 552 notes
44sur 100
Wolt works well in cities new to the user and earns praise for its interface, but chronic courier delays and weak support when orders go wrong erode trust among regular users.
Points forts : The app is considered the best way to order food in an unfamiliar city while traveling.
Reproches : Multi-stop delivery regularly results in food arriving cold, and support doesn't take responsibility for errors.
Pour qui : Travelers and expats in European cities where Wolt operates
Rang 45. Note des avis : 43 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 170 206 notes
43sur 100
Grubhub for Drivers gives couriers flexible scheduling and occasionally lucrative order bundles, but the deactivation system is opaque: penalties arrive without explanation, and route distances are often unprofitable. Order volume depends heavily on the zone.
Points forts : The ability to choose your own blocks and work a flexible schedule with no fixed shifts.
Reproches : The app has no built-in navigation, couriers have to manually switch between Grubhub and a maps app for every delivery.
Rang 46. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 22 502 171 notes
42sur 100
An aggregator platform with wide city and restaurant coverage, but with chronic problems in order accuracy and courier routing. Orders frequently arrive incomplete, couriers make multiple stops along the way, and support denies compensation.
Points forts : A broad selection of restaurants and grocery stores in one place, with convenient preference personalization.
Reproches : Roughly 9 out of 10 orders arrive with item errors, and the courier batches multiple deliveries by default, letting food cool before the first stop.
Pour qui : Someone who can't go out and is willing to accept order errors
Rang 47. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 425 773 notes
42sur 100
The loyalty program and discounts work when the app doesn't freeze, but stability is poor: crashes, forced re-logins every day, and a broken payment scanner are common. In-store cashiers don't always accept points.
Points forts : Accumulated points for drinks and fuel add up to real savings for regular visitors.
Reproches : The app constantly logs users out and demands re-authentication, which is frustrating at the register.
Pour qui : Drivers who stop at the station frequently
Rang 48. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 321 757 notes
42sur 100
Talabat covers a wide restaurant network across the Middle East, but delivery reliability and support quality draw serious complaints. Cancelled orders with no refund and boilerplate support responses appear in reviews regularly.
Points forts : A large restaurant selection and generally respected delivery time estimates.
Reproches : Support doesn't actually resolve issues, it replies with the same template regardless of the question.
Pour qui : UAE and Kuwait residents who prioritize restaurant coverage and can tolerate unpredictable service
Rang 49. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 31 535 notes
42sur 100
Jollibee earns genuine love for its signature chicken and Filipino food, but the app regularly freezes at payment, loses loyalty points, and can't locate nearby branches in some markets.
Points forts : The unique flavor of the food, especially Chickenjoy, creates a strong emotional bond with the brand.
Reproches : The rewards system loses accumulated points after reinstallation and doesn't let the account recover properly.
Pour qui : Brand fans in the diaspora and the Philippine market who order despite the technical issues
Rang 50. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 22 170 notes
42sur 100
Ritual is designed for queue-free pickup, but the app often freezes, the partner restaurant list keeps shrinking, and the pay-and-walk-in mechanic doesn't always work. The value depends heavily on the city.
Points forts : The points system is simple and actually works for regulars.
Reproches : The number of partner venues is falling, and in many cities there's little left to choose from.
Pour qui : Office workers in major cities where a Ritual-network cafe is nearby
Rang 51. Note des avis : 41 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 1 589 465 notes
41sur 100
This app is aimed at shopper partners, not recipients. The main complaints from shoppers: in-store product location maps removed after an update, inflated distance data, and difficulty getting support in non-standard situations.
Points forts : Flexible scheduling: you can work any time you want with no fixed shifts.
Reproches : The update removed the in-aisle product location map, which increased picking time.
Pour qui : Shopper partners looking for flexible gig income
Rang 52. Note des avis : 41 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 237 188 notes
41sur 100
Factor prepares quality meals that users who've tried them enjoy, but the service undermines itself: the auto-selected menu for a skipped week guesses poorly, support is slow or unhelpful, and the app breaks regularly when selecting meals. The subscription model amplifies frustration when things go wrong.
Points forts : Meals arrive fresh, chilled, and good, especially the classic menu items.
Reproches : Auto-selection for a skipped week ignores saved preferences and sends a repetitive, uninspired menu.
Pour qui : Busy singles or couples who want prepared food without a grocery trip and know how to manage a subscription
Rang 53. Note des avis : 41 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 198 330 notes
41sur 100
Careem holds on as the only large super-app in the region: rides, food, and delivery in one place. Driver quality is inconsistent, the interface is cluttered and frequently glitchy, and address detection is imprecise.
Points forts : Wide MENA market coverage and the ability to combine a ride, food, and delivery in one app.
Reproches : Driver routes are illogical, there's no multi-stop support, which is a basic feature on every competing app.
Pour qui : Middle East residents with no alternatives
Rang 54. Note des avis : 41 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 78 511 notes
41sur 100
The food consistently draws praise, but the app is broken enough at the sign-in and points stage that many users switch to the website or guest mode. Brand loyalty is held by the kitchen quality, not the app.
Points forts : The chicken salad and the atmosphere of the restaurants make people genuinely want to come back.
Reproches : The loyalty system doesn't work as promised: receipt scans don't register, and points disappear.
Pour qui : Regular guests of the restaurant who are willing to put up with a broken app
Rang 55. Note des avis : 40 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 99 776 notes
40sur 100
PedidosYa systematically delivers incomplete orders, deliveries run an hour or more late, and support is effectively unreachable. Payment through the app fails intermittently, courier chat freezes, and users simply can't track their order or resolve issues.
Points forts : At best, the order arrives quickly and without complaints.
Reproches : Incomplete orders are common, and there's no working mechanism inside the app to dispute the situation.
Pour qui : Residents of major Latin American cities who need delivery and have no alternative in their market
Rang 56. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 4 616 573 notes
38sur 100
A restaurant delivery platform focused on convenient ordering, but with growing logistics problems. Couriers take multiple orders at once, food arrives cold, GPS frequently can't find the address, and dark mode was removed without explanation.
Points forts : When things work smoothly, the order arrives on time, and support sometimes compensates for delivery to the wrong address.
Reproches : Couriers wait for additional orders before leaving, so if yours was first, the food arrives cold.
Pour qui : Office workers who need lunch delivered from a specific nearby restaurant
Rang 57. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 1 976 639 notes
38sur 100
Yelp has long outgrown food delivery and become a review aggregator for everything from campgrounds to realtors. As a restaurant discovery tool it works, but list navigation broke for many users after the last update.
Points forts : Years of personal restaurant lists with visit history built up over time.
Reproches : Sorting and filtering within personal lists breaks regularly after updates.
Pour qui : People who enjoy curating restaurant guides
Rang 58. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 719 159 notes
38sur 100
The app is convenient for placing an order itself, but delivery tracking effectively doesn't work: users get no notifications about the courier and don't know when to expect food. Support is unreachable when there's a problem.
Points forts : Fast and easy to place an order at a local pizzeria without calling.
Reproches : No working courier tracking: users don't know if the driver has left or when to expect delivery.
Rang 59. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 307 315 notes
38sur 100
Favor was historically valued as a reliable Texas alternative to the big aggregators, but the switch to pre-tipped checkout and a rise in non-delivery incidents have seriously eroded user trust. Roughly 75% of orders end in delivery problems for some users.
Points forts : H-E-B integration makes grocery ordering convenient for Texas residents.
Reproches : Couriers started ignoring delivery instructions after the switch to the pre-tipped system.
Pour qui : Residents of major Texas cities who need H-E-B delivery and have no alternatives
Rang 60. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 170 770 notes
38sur 100
After the DoorDash acquisition, Caviar became essentially a DoorDash wrapper with a pricier interface: delivery windows are missed, items disappear from orders, and support stopped reordering on problems. Restaurant selection remains a strong point.
Points forts : The best restaurant catalog in its segment, especially smaller and unconventional city spots.
Reproches : After selecting a restaurant from the list, the app resets the scroll position to the top, annoying when browsing the menu a second time.
Pour qui : Food enthusiasts looking for rare spots not available on other platforms
Rang 61. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 123 783 notes
38sur 100
Red Lobster Dining Rewards exists as a loyalty app but doesn't let you order inside, it sends you to a website that locks accounts, and in-app promotions are unknown to restaurant staff. The app's product value is near zero despite genuinely good food.
Points forts : Seafood dishes appeal to regular guests, and a good server makes the visit memorable.
Reproches : The app doesn't support ordering and isn't synced with real menu items or in-restaurant promotions.
Pour qui : Devoted Red Lobster guests who want to earn points and are willing to deal with a clunky interface
Rang 62. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 67 961 notes
38sur 100
The service is convenient for people who don't want to plan meals, but ingredient quality has declined: portions have shrunk, vegetables arrive spoiled, and individual dishes occasionally ship without a key component. Cancelling a subscription is hard, and support goes quiet.
Points forts : A wide recipe selection and predictable deliveries eliminate daily meal planning.
Reproches : Box completeness is inconsistent: orders sometimes arrive missing meat or with spoiled produce.
Pour qui : Busy people who value saving time on meal prep
Rang 63. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 37 211 notes
38sur 100
Users love the product itself, but the app systematically breaks the ordering flow: slow payment processing, frequent sign-outs, and unresponsive buttons. The digital channel pushes customers away rather than helping them.
Points forts : The product and in-store staff receive genuine warmth from regulars.
Reproches : Reordering was made more complicated, not simpler, and purchase history disappears when the app forces a sign-out.
Pour qui : Brand fans willing to put up with a broken digital channel
Rang 64. Note des avis : 36 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 10 488 710 notes
36sur 100
A large food and grocery delivery platform with global reach, but with systemic courier assignment problems: cyclists pick up orders several kilometers from the restaurant, orders vanish without warning, and delivery to the wrong address happens regularly.
Points forts : A wide selection of restaurants and stores, with round-the-clock availability in most cities.
Reproches : The courier assignment algorithm doesn't account for distance to the restaurant, so food starts cooling before the first stop.
Pour qui : City dwellers who need food or groceries at night with no alternatives
Rang 65. Note des avis : 36 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 496 961 notes
36sur 100
Orders consistently run an hour or more late, arrive cold, and support cuts off the chat instead of helping. Courier tracking lags behind competitors and frequently misleads.
Points forts : A wide selection of local restaurants in one place with order history.
Reproches : Delivery time estimates are unreliable: orders run late, get rescheduled multiple times, and often get cancelled without notice.
Pour qui : New Yorkers with a credit card subscription and a lot of patience
Rang 66. Note des avis : 36 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 33 317 notes
36sur 100
Delivery.com, rebranded as Order, lost reliability after the change: restaurants don't accept orders through the renamed platform, cancelled orders don't get refunded, and the technical side has degraded. A small loyal base appreciates historically low commissions and niche categories like laundry and alcohol.
Points forts : Niche delivery categories unavailable on competing platforms, and historically lower menu markups.
Reproches : After the rebrand, restaurants frequently don't fulfill orders, and support can't fix the problem.
Pour qui : A regular user in a specific city where the platform still runs reliably
Rang 67. Note des avis : 36 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 20 004 notes
36sur 100
Fantuan positions itself as a platform for Asian food with attractive deals, but the actual logistics frequently break down: couriers head in the wrong direction, restaurants in the catalog don't exist, and refunds land in an internal wallet.
Points forts : A wide selection of Asian restaurants and student discounts in university cities.
Reproches : Coordination between the platform and restaurants is weak: orders get lost, and the customer is left to sort it out themselves.
Pour qui : Students and diaspora members looking for Asian food with coupons, willing to accept an inconsistent service
Rang 68. Note des avis : 35 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 159 774 notes
35sur 100
7NOW delivers items from the nearest 7-Eleven, but fulfillment accuracy is unstable: drivers mark orders as delivered without actually showing up, the catalog doesn't reflect actual in-store inventory, and the app breaks after updates.
Points forts : Round-the-clock delivery of drinks, snacks, and everyday items from a store practically next door.
Reproches : You can't choose a specific store manually, the app assigns the nearest one automatically, even if it has persistent inventory issues.
Pour qui : Anyone who urgently needs a snack or a convenience item delivered
Rang 69. Note des avis : 35 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 39 592 notes
35sur 100
This is a courier app, not a customer app: reviews describe problems with the order assignment algorithm, rating penalties for technical glitches, and insufficient pay on demanding routes. There's not enough data here to assess the end-customer experience.
Points forts : For new couriers the app is relatively easy to get started with, and you can begin working quickly.
Reproches : The courier rating is penalized for the app's own failures, which creates an unfair evaluation system.
Pour qui : Couriers in Texas looking for flexible part-time work
Rang 70. Note des avis : 35 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 21 043 notes
35sur 100
HungryPanda remains the primary choice for Asian food among diaspora communities, but delivery quality is unpredictable: orders run late, support ignores problems, and hidden fees appear at checkout.
Points forts : A wide selection of authentic Chinese, Japanese, and Asian restaurants in US and UK cities.
Reproches : Courier tracking behaves erratically, and getting a refund after a problematic delivery is nearly impossible.
Pour qui : Chinese-speaking users abroad who want access to familiar cuisine
Rang 71. Note des avis : 34 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 250 442 notes
34sur 100
Foodpanda covers Asian markets and operates as an aggregator, but couriers regularly run late or cancel orders, restaurant inventory isn't synced with the app, and customers can't cancel an order. Delivery status notifications are unreliable.
Points forts : Wide restaurant and store coverage, including locations in smaller Asian cities.
Reproches : A courier can decline an order after being assigned, and finding a new one can take another hour.
Pour qui : Residents of Asian cities with limited alternative services
Rang 72. Note des avis : 33 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 520 571 notes
33sur 100
The app isn't synced with real restaurant menus, payment data doesn't save between sessions, and Facebook login breaks regularly. Order customization is extremely limited.
Points forts : When everything works, it's convenient to plan a pickup in advance and use discounts.
Reproches : The app accepts orders for items that aren't available at a specific location, with no one able to fix the situation.
Pour qui : An occasional visitor to a specific good Arby's near home
Rang 73. Note des avis : 33 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 227 882 notes
33sur 100
Glovo is present across multiple markets in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East, but consistently fails when things go wrong: refunds for store errors take weeks, support can't cancel an order, and cancellation fees are charged even when Glovo itself initiated the cancellation. Reliability doesn't meet the standard of major aggregators.
Points forts : Fast delivery in standard situations and availability in cities where DoorDash or Uber Eats aren't present.
Reproches : Support can't refund an incomplete order or cancel an order with a restaurant-side error.
Pour qui : Users outside the US who don't have access to major Western aggregators
Rang 74. Note des avis : 33 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 32 816 notes
33sur 100
The food at Jason's Deli earns genuine affection, but the app systematically prevents you from ordering it: it freezes at payment, won't let you reset your password, loses loyalty points, and doesn't support basic sandwich customization.
Points forts : Product quality, freshness, the salad bar, and signature sandwiches create real attachment to the chain.
Reproches : The sandwich builder doesn't let you put together simple combinations like a BLT that exist on the physical menu.
Pour qui : Regular guests who prefer ordering by phone or directly at the counter
Rang 75. Note des avis : 33 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 20 111 notes
33sur 100
Lieferando is Germany's largest delivery aggregator, but orders are routinely marked as delivered without an actual delivery, support responds with a bot and resolves nothing. Restaurant ratings on the platform often don't reflect reality.
Points forts : Wide coverage across German cities and a clean interface, even for non-German-speaking expats.
Reproches : There's no working dispute tool: no refunds, no live agent, no transparent order status.
Pour qui : German residents who need food delivery with no alternative in their city
Rang 76. Note des avis : 32 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 2 461 344 notes
32sur 100
The DoorDash courier app suffers from an opaque order distribution algorithm. Platinum status doesn't translate into real pay advantages, navigation suggests unnecessarily long routes, and wait times are unpredictable regardless of how busy it is.
Points forts : With a steady flow of orders and smart timing, the app lets you earn without being tied to a schedule.
Reproches : The order distribution algorithm is opaque: Platinum couriers get the same low-paying orders as newcomers.
Pour qui : Couriers with their own vehicle looking for flexible part-time work in their city
Rang 77. Note des avis : 32 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 89 641 notes
32sur 100
Denny's updates its app so frequently and so poorly that each new release breaks something that worked before: can't sign in, menu won't load, earned points disappear. The chain itself is liked, but the digital channel has become a source of frustration.
Points forts : The food at Denny's restaurants, especially breakfasts and signature dishes, is appreciated by guests.
Reproches : You can't exclude an ingredient from an order, the delivery address doesn't update when your location changes, and there's no way to flag an error to the store through the app.
Pour qui : Regular Denny's guests who prefer dining in and only use the app to browse the menu
Rang 78. Note des avis : 31 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 25 075 notes
31sur 100
ChowNow regularly delivers orders an hour or more late, couriers take winding routes between addresses, and support is either unreachable or gives templated responses. Delivered to the wrong address with no refund.
Points forts : Direct support for local restaurants without large platform commissions on the restaurant side.
Reproches : No real-time courier tracking and no order readiness updates.
Pour qui : People who want to support local restaurants on principle and are willing to wait
Rang 79. Note des avis : 30 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 4 981 903 notes
30sur 100
A Domino's pizza ordering app with a delivery tracker and points program, but after the interface redesign reliability collapsed. Payment fails, the tracker shows the wrong status, and reordering became a multi-step process instead of one tap.
Points forts : A points program and clear pizza customization when the app is working properly.
Reproches : After the interface update you can't quickly repeat a saved order, and the delivery tracker shows the wrong status.
Pour qui : A regular Domino's customer who orders the same thing every week
Rang 80. Note des avis : 30 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 1 135 623 notes
30sur 100
The app periodically won't let you add items to the cart, defaults to a previous location instead of the nearest one, and doesn't let you modify or add to an already-placed order. People who actually get their food rarely complain about it.
Points forts : Automatic check-in when you're at the restaurant and convenient menu browsing.
Reproches : You can't add an item to an already-placed order even a few minutes before it's ready.
Pour qui : Young regulars who live near a Taco Bell and visit often
Rang 81. Note des avis : 30 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 39 311 notes
30sur 100
Orders arrive with the wrong menu item, couriers are systematically late, and delivery zones are restricted in the evening. The call-center support isn't sufficient for the volume of complaints.
Points forts : In-app promotions and discounts attract users who actively take advantage of them.
Reproches : Order accuracy is low: the wrong size or item is delivered frequently.
Pour qui : Iraqi residents with few alternative delivery services available
Rang 82. Note des avis : 29 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 634 714 notes
29sur 100
The app's main feature, in-app trivia for earning rewards, stops working for weeks at a time, and account login breaks periodically. Order errors are found both in the app and at pickup.
Points forts : The app looks clean and modern on the surface.
Reproches : The core loyalty mechanic, trivia and points earning, goes down for extended periods without explanation.
Pour qui : Wing fans willing to tolerate an unstable loyalty program
Rang 83. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 7 728 998 notes
28sur 100
The McDonald's app for mobile ordering and the loyalty program chronically fails to load on time, loses points after a promo is applied, and signs users out. The main scenario fails: showing the code at the register doesn't work because the app freezes at exactly the wrong moment.
Points forts : Earning and spending points on favorite menu items when the internet connection is stable.
Reproches : The app opens so slowly you have to launch it several minutes before arriving at the restaurant, or the code won't load in time.
Pour qui : A regular McDonald's visitor willing to wrestle with the app for discounts
Rang 84. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 1 190 236 notes
28sur 100
Subway completely rebuilt its app, and the result is worse than what came before: you can't combine a gift card balance with another payment method, profiles don't save, and the app demands an update almost every visit. People love the sandwiches, but the app gets in the way.
Points forts : The ability to build a sandwich with the ingredients you want ahead of time and skip the line.
Reproches : You can't use a remaining gift card balance alongside another payment method.
Pour qui : Regular Subway guests who want to skip the queue
Rang 85. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 202 472 notes
28sur 100
Deliveroo systematically misses delivery windows: orders run an hour or more late, the time estimate updates several times without explanation, and support doesn't solve problems. Order accuracy is also off, wrong items appear regularly.
Points forts : When the courier arrives on time, the food is hot and the delivery works exactly as it should.
Reproches : Contacting the courier or restaurant is nearly impossible: drivers ask for the address by phone even though it's already in the order.
Pour qui : Those willing to wait and accept the risk of an inaccurate order
Rang 86. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 31 093 notes
28sur 100
Yemeksepeti receives systematic complaints about incomplete and wrong orders, no real support, and the inability to cancel an order after one minute. For tourists the platform is additionally inaccessible due to a Turkish phone number requirement.
Points forts : Delivery speed in individual cases is rated highly, and niche discounts attract part of the audience.
Reproches : Support doesn't take responsibility for restaurant errors and closes tickets without resolution.
Pour qui : A local user in Turkey with no alternative platforms in their area
Rang 87. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 29 783 notes
28sur 100
Couriers go missing or carry multiple orders at once, food arrives cold or not at all. Support is slow, and compensation only comes back as app-wallet credit.
Points forts : Prices on some items are lower than on competing services.
Reproches : Logistics can't handle peak demand: there aren't enough couriers, and delivery order is opaque.
Pour qui : Riyadh residents willing to accept unpredictable wait times in exchange for discounts
Rang 89. Note des avis : 25 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 4 228 902 notes
25sur 100
The Pizza Hut ordering and delivery tracking app consistently fails at basic scenarios. You can't sign in, tracking breaks after updates, points expire every six months, and random taps add items to the cart without confirmation.
Points forts : Bundle deals let you put together a large family order at a good price.
Reproches : After every major update, either authentication, delivery tracking, or order history stops working.
Pour qui : A family that orders pizza weekly and is willing to call in when the app fails
Rang 90. Note des avis : 25 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 180 331 notes
25sur 100
HungerStation regularly fails on delivery: orders run late, arrive cold, or don't arrive at all, and drivers cancel without consequences. Support responds with boilerplate apologies and doesn't issue refunds.
Points forts : Wide restaurant selection and a familiar interface for regular Saudi users.
Reproches : There's no direct in-app channel to reach the restaurant, so clarifying or adjusting an order is impossible.
Pour qui : Loyal users in the KSA market with no better alternative
Rang 91. Note des avis : 25 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 42 481 notes
25sur 100
Couriers mark orders as delivered without showing up, and support has been replaced by a bot that stalls and resolves nothing. Delivery is consistently late, and money is only returned after threatening to file a complaint.
Points forts : Good restaurant coverage and first-order discounts attract new users.
Reproches : Support can't resolve an order dispute without a lengthy back-and-forth and escalation.
Pour qui : Middle East users who have no more reliable alternative
Rang 92. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 2 626 235 notes
22sur 100
The Sonic pre-ordering and drink discount app fails at the one thing people download it for. In-app payment fails in about half of cases, authentication breaks after updates, and promo points can't be applied even with the right items in the cart.
Points forts : When the app works, the 50% drink discount during Happy Hour genuinely saves money.
Reproches : In-app payment fails so often that people drive to Sonic and can't order at the discount they came for.
Pour qui : A regular Sonic visitor willing to restart the app several times for a drink discount
Rang 93. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 84 061 notes
22sur 100
Couriers mark orders as delivered without showing up, and support closes the chat instead of helping. Orders sit for hours without a courier, and missing money only comes back as platform credits.
Points forts : Wide city coverage and fast delivery when the system works without issues.
Reproches : No real buyer protection when an order goes missing or arrives wrong.
Pour qui : Patient Latin American residents with no better alternative
Rang 94. Note des avis : 18 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 61 931 notes
18sur 100
The app regularly won't let you sign in, fails to process orders, and throws technical errors, while restaurants don't see the orders on their end. At this reliability level, the app can't fulfill its basic purpose.
Points forts : The food and in-restaurant service consistently earn high marks from guests who make it to the restaurant.
Reproches : Online ordering is so unreliable it's easier to call the restaurant directly.
Pour qui : Restaurant guests who prefer to order by phone rather than through the app
À propos des chiffres
Deux chiffres — deux sources
Elles aident à comparer les apps, mais ne remplacent pas la vérification de ta propre tâche.
Score des avis · jusqu’à 100
Le score conservé de l’étude inApp sur les textes des avis. Il évalue l’ensemble de l’app dans l’archive, pas la fiabilité d’une fonction précise.
Note de la boutique · jusqu’à 5
La note de la page de l’app au moment de la collecte. La note et la version actuelles peuvent différer.
Dans l’échantillon archivé de ce sujet : 94 apps et 32 989 avis lus. C’est le volume total de l’étude, pas le nombre d’avis par app.
Un écart entre les chiffres ne prouve pas de manipulation. La date de calcul et la méthode complète du score ne sont pas dans l’archive mobile. Compare les descriptions des tâches et les citations sources, et vérifie les conditions dans la version actuelle.
