天気・92アプリ・24,055件のレビューを分析
アプリについての本文は英語です。
Where the forecast holds and alerts arrive on time, and where the radar lies and ads pile up. レビュー本文のスコアが高いのはWeather & Widget（84/100）、Windy.com（74）、Zoom Earth（70）です。
順位はレビュー本文のスコア（100点満点）順です。★はApp Storeの評価です。評価について
One of the few weather aggregators that lets you choose your forecast source from multiple models. Users report genuine accuracy in tricky regions and call it the best they found after a long search for a Weather Channel alternative.
評価点
The ability to switch between weather data providers and the complete absence of ads.
不満点
The home-screen widget does not always refresh without manually opening the app.
向いている人：Users who want control over their data source and cannot tolerate ads
For aviation, sailing, and cycling it delivers detailed wind layers, water temperature, and tropical-system data with multi-day accuracy that users have verified in the field. The main product issue is that the forecast model slider sometimes lags behind the selected hour, which matters when timing is critical.
評価点
Multi-layer wind forecasts by altitude and tropical-system accuracy four to five days out.
不満点
The timeline slider can fall out of sync with the actual model hour, introducing error when precise timing matters.
向いている人：Pilots, sailors, and anyone planning outdoor activities
Zoom Earth stands out with its global satellite map and an excellent hurricane tracker; the forecast is accurate enough for general use. After radar was removed in one update some users left, but the core value for tracking large systems remained.
評価点
The best tool for watching hurricanes and storms at a global scale, all in one tap.
不満点
No legend for the layers, impossible to zoom in to street level, and the hurricane track forecast sometimes diverges from the consensus cone.
向いている人：Global weather enthusiasts, hurricane chasers, and travelers
Authors describe an empty notification and a radar they cannot reach. What is needed is the source, the period the message covers and an explicit connection state.
CARROT Weather、Climeほか3件
Authors compare the wind against what they observe on the spot. It helps to show the model, the altitude, the period and the difference between forecast and measurement, without a blanket guarantee of accuracy.
Windy.com、Ventuskyほか3件
A RainDrop author compares the data with his rain gauge. The summary benefits from a source and a period, so that a model estimate is not mixed with a local measurement.
14 Day Weather Forecast、RainDropほか3件
Authors describe a stale widget and elements that vanished. What is needed is an update time, clear settings and the chosen view being kept.
Weather & Widget、(Not Boring) Weatherほか3件
Authors notice screens that disagree with each other. It helps to give one period and one source while keeping the uncertainty of the forecast visible.
Weather Puppy Forecast + Radar、The Weather Networkほか3件
A compact app with solid alerts and a clean forecast layout that loyal users call their primary choice. The sample size is too small for confident conclusions on overall accuracy, but there are almost no specific complaints about forecast errors.
評価点：Timely alerts for approaching storms and a convenient hourly navigation.
不満点：Occasionally fails to load for no visible reason; the radar timeline does not start from the current moment.
向いている人：Users who want a simple, quiet daily forecast
One of the few apps where users describe real use cases: navigating CarPlay through a tornado warning zone, precise severe-weather alerts, access to ensemble forecasts and SPC data. Forecast accuracy is rated good in reviews; the main product issue is that location does not switch automatically when traveling.
評価点：A unique combination of professional-grade data (ensemble, SPC) with a fun character and a clean interface.
不満点：Location does not update automatically when moving from city to city; requires manual correction.
向いている人：Power users who want serious data and a polished interface
Ventusky offers a rich set of meteorological layers and is useful for professional planning, but wind accuracy has degraded, sometimes showing five times less than actual speed, and the cluttered post-redesign interface makes navigation harder. Good for those who know how to read pressure charts.
評価点：Indispensable for offshore planning and aviation: the 14-day forecast with fronts and precipitation holds up.
不満点：Wind speed can differ from reality by a factor of several, which is dangerous for marine and aviation operations.
向いている人：Pilots, offshore professionals, and weather enthusiasts
Weather Puppy delivers a reasonably accurate forecast via Foreca and Apple Weather, but it remains a dog-themed app rather than a serious weather tool. The radar occasionally shows a thunderstorm where the sky is clear.
評価点：Forecast accuracy is quite decent, and the app lifts your mood from the first second.
不満点：The radar periodically shows precipitation that does not exist, and the bark notification does not always fire at the scheduled time.
向いている人：Those who want a forecast with personality rather than raw tables
A clean, ad-free interface layered over NWS data, with a forecast discussion forum. Accuracy is good in spring and summer, slightly weaker in winter. The most honest minimalism in the segment.
評価点：The NWS forecaster Forecast Discussion is the most informative text forecast available, something no other app offers.
不満点：Zone and acronym navigation is opaque for newcomers, and switching regions takes extra steps.
向いている人：US users who want raw NWS data without extra layers
Windy.app is more accurate than most competitors for wind and waves in active outdoor sports, but the free tier is heavily limited and forecast accuracy is unstable at low speeds. Its strong niche is marine navigation, fishing, and kitesurfing.
評価点：Out of nine wind apps on the phone, this one holds up better than the rest, especially for getting out on the water.
不満点：Wind forecasts at low speeds (7-10 mph) often miss reality; leaves don't move where a breeze was promised.
向いている人：Sailors, anglers, and kitesurfers
One of the few apps where users praise both accuracy and readability, not just design. Severe-weather warnings work. The weak point is that widgets were moved behind a paywall, cutting practical value for part of the audience.
評価点：The animated layout makes weather instantly clear rather than a boring table.
不満点：Without a subscription there is no home-screen widget, and the widget is the main use case for a weather app.
向いている人：Users who value visual readability over raw numbers
One of the most data-dense weather aggregators, with earthquakes, radar, and detailed animation, but the iOS version noticeably lags behind Android in quality. Some users report a systematic temperature offset of 8-10 degrees.
評価点：The breadth of data is impressive: weather, radar, earthquakes, and geomagnetic activity in one app.
不満点：Temperature forecast accuracy is inconsistent: some users see a constant offset of 8-10 degrees from real values.
向いている人：Weather enthusiasts who need many data layers on one screen
Users trust the local meteorologists and value accuracy for specific neighborhoods, but severe-weather alerts cover the entire broadcast zone without filtering by location. The app runs on trust in the TV team rather than on technology.
評価点：Video forecasts from familiar meteorologists tied to a specific local area.
不満点：No location filtering for alerts: warnings come in for the entire broadcast region.
向いている人：Residents of the WSAZ broadcast area in West Virginia and Kentucky
A beautiful clock widget with a live globe and a reasonably accurate forecast, but the version 4.20 redesign traded simplicity for an overloaded screen and removed the temperature badge.
評価点：The animated Earth with clouds gives an intuitive sense of what is coming from the west.
不満点：No radar at all, and the hourly forecast became an unreadable chart with tiny numbers after the update.
向いている人：Those who want beautiful lock-screen widgets
Windfinder is good as a specialized tool for sailors and surfers, but wind and wave accuracy has degraded over recent years and is now reliable in roughly half of cases. Not for anyone who just needs basic temperatures.
評価点：No trip on the water without it: it picks the best days well and keeps routes free of surprises.
不満点：Wind speed and direction increasingly diverge from reality, and wave height disappeared from several locations after the last update.
向いている人：Sailors, surfers, and boat owners
Tomorrow.io outperforms most competitors on hyperlocal precipitation forecasts tied to exact map coordinates, but the 10-day forecast is unstable, sunrise/sunset times show an offset, and push notifications regularly fail to fire.
評価点：Precipitation forecast is tied to precise coordinates rather than the city as a whole, which matters most in areas with complex terrain.
不満点：The daily and hourly forecasts sometimes contradict each other, which is confusing when planning.
向いている人：Those for whom it matters whether rain will fall here in the next hour
The app's strength is local wind and tide data; anglers have praised wind accuracy for years. The weak spot is precipitation: the daily rain icon does not change even when the sun is actually shining, which is confusing.
評価点：Wind speed and direction forecast more accurate than most competitors.
不満点：The all-day cloud icon does not reflect actual weather changes throughout the day.
向いている人：Anglers and outdoor enthusiasts for whom wind and tide matter
The app is valued for its graphical precipitation accuracy and an honest 14-day horizon without extra noise. The hourly forecast periodically breaks and shows only one time slot, making it a useless widget until the next refresh.
評価点：Accurate precipitation figures without panic or unnecessary dramatization.
不満点：The hourly forecast sometimes collapses to a single 1 a.m. row and stops updating without a reinstall.
向いている人：Those planning trips, outdoor work, or farming tasks two weeks out
The Weather Network was once known for its accuracy in Canada and precipitation detail, but after a redesign and a data breach accuracy declined, the font got smaller, and ads became more prominent. For trail and climbing outdoor activity, precipitation detail is still among the best.
評価点：Precipitation detail helps you stay on the route or leave it at exactly the right moment.
不満点：After the redesign forecast accuracy got worse, and the side menu opens and closes on its own.
向いている人：Canadian users and outdoor enthusiasts who need a detailed precipitation map
A solid radar base using NOAA data with a minimalist map interface, but monetization has degraded to scam banners that open phishing sites and to aggressive upgrade prompts.
評価点：A clean radar screen without extra layers, reliable for tracking hurricanes and thunderstorms.
不満点：In-app ad banners link to phishing sites warning of viruses on your device.
向いている人：Real-time radar fans who can tolerate aggressive monetization
The best radar-focused app for precipitation visualization quality and widget flexibility. The main downside is connection drops during critical moments and weak temperature accuracy.
評価点：Flexible widgets with radar zoom control and the ability to toggle between multiple data types in one widget.
不満点：The server loses connection precisely during serious storms, when the app is needed most.
向いている人：Those who want a clean radar with no clutter and good widgets
A companion app for a personal Ambient weather station: it shows your real data with backyard-level precision rather than the nearest official station. The weak spot is a fussy connection and a confusing interface when moving or changing routers.
評価点：Hyperlocal readings from your own equipment in real time, accessible remotely from anywhere.
不満点：When switching internet providers or routers, sync breaks and does not recover without complex troubleshooting.
向いている人：Owners of Ambient Weather personal weather stations
The app appeals to serious weather watchers: good fronts, a format useful for anglers and travelers. But temperature accuracy drifts up to 15 degrees, storm notifications arrive one to two hours late, and widgets and watch complications periodically stop updating without user intervention.
評価点：The weather-front map and rich data set for those who want the full picture.
不満点：Severe-weather alerts arrive noticeably late; widgets lose sync and show stale temperatures.
向いている人：Nature lovers and anglers who want detailed summaries
Live NOAA radar focused on severe weather: users in tornado-prone and snowy regions report noticeably better accuracy than competitors. The weak spot is an alert system that cries wolf with false alarms and misses real events.
評価点：Snow and front movement are displayed more accurately than most alternatives for mountain and plains regions of the US.
不満点：Storm alerts fire unpredictably: panic with no real threat, then silence during an actual hurricane.
向いている人：Residents of storm-prone US regions who need raw NOAA radar
WeatherBug Elite built a loyal audience over years of accurate performance, but the past year or two show growing technical debt: radar delayed by 10+ minutes, non-working notifications on iOS 26, and a freezing interface.
評価点：Lightning alerts and the observer-station network have historically been more accurate than competitors.
不満点：Radar and lightning notifications lag by 10 or more minutes, which is critical when hiking or riding a motorcycle.
向いている人：Long-time users willing to accept technical shortcomings for the sake of a familiar interface
Solid basic forecast and a meteorology team that the audience genuinely trusts. The main technical issue is that the radar updates every 15 minutes instead of real time, and recent updates removed the ability to view past data.
評価点：Local Region 8 meteorologists monitor severe weather and issue early warnings.
不満点：Radar lags 15 minutes behind and shows no precipitation history, only forward forecast.
向いている人：Residents of Arkansas (Region 8), especially during tornado season
A marine-specialized NOAA data aggregator with useful planning tools, but buoys are often offline, radar is patchy in some areas, and key data (water temperature) is locked behind a paywall.
評価点：Point forecast directly on the water map and access to NOAA data without extra steps.
不満点：Buoy data is regularly unavailable, and the wave forecast lags one to two days behind reality.
向いている人：Anglers and sailors near the US coastline
There is a core of users who praise wind-speed and temperature accuracy, but several independent reviews note discrepancies from reality of 5 degrees or more, and alerts do not fire during snowstorms. Accuracy is inconsistent.
評価点：Wind-speed and temperature data are considered among the most accurate compared to competitors.
不満点：Current conditions often do not match what is happening outside.
向いている人：Those for whom wind matters, such as cyclists or sailors
First Alert 4 from KSDK provides reasonably accurate warnings for the St. Louis area, but ads interrupt live streams during emergency storms, and radar plus notifications periodically break after updates.
評価点：Steve Templeton's voice alerts fire even at night and genuinely warn of dangerous storms.
不満点：Ads appear during a live tornado broadcast, blocking information about location and direction.
向いている人：Residents of the St. Louis area during tornado season
Historically a reliable tool for tracking tornadoes and severe weather with text-to-speech notifications, but now notifications arrive with no data inside the app, and during an actual tornado warning the phone alert and the in-app alert did not match. For a safety app this is a critical failure.
評価点：Text-to-speech notifications and the ability to monitor several saved cities on one screen.
不満点：Severe-weather notifications arrive, but when you open the app there is no data inside.
向いている人：Residents of tornado-prone areas who need instant alerts
WSB-TV Weather has historically provided accurate forecasts for Atlanta and was valued for timely alerts, but after a redesign the radar started lagging 5-15 minutes and storm notifications arrive after the storm has already passed. This is critical for a tornado-prone region.
評価点：The WSB meteorology team remains one of the most reliable for forecast accuracy in Georgia.
不満点：Lightning and tornado notifications arrive 20-30 minutes after the event, making them useless for safety.
向いている人：Residents of Atlanta and Georgia who trust WSB-TV
The main value is the sarcastic commentary on the forecast, not the forecast itself: temperature sometimes differs from reality by 10 degrees and there is no radar at all. After a change of ownership the app lost its voice pack and started nagging users for tracking consent.
評価点：Snarky captions on the weather brighten even the gloomiest day.
不満点：No built-in radar, and temperature diverges noticeably from reality during rapid weather changes.
向いている人：Those who want a laugh in the morning and check accurate forecasts in a different app
Before a major update it was one of the best trackers with accurate precipitation forecasting, but after the redesign radar animation freezes, lightning alerts fire, and the rain forecast began producing errors of 3 inches at zero actual precipitation after an AI feature was introduced. Long-term users note a concrete decline in accuracy.
評価点：Real-time lightning warnings and detailed future radar before the update.
不満点：After the redesign the map animation freezes, and precipitation forecast accuracy dropped after the AI feature was added.
向いている人：Weather enthusiasts willing to work through a complex interface
KPLC is rightfully considered the most accurate forecast for southwest Louisiana, but the radar periodically shows no precipitation even during a downpour, and notifications arrive overnight for events that are no longer relevant. Navigation became uncomfortable after the redesign.
評価点：Local meteorologists hit the forecast for Louisiana where national services miss.
不満点：The radar sometimes shows clear skies during an active downpour directly overhead.
向いている人：Residents of southwest Louisiana, especially during hurricane season
The radar is unstable after updates and flickers so fast that the picture is impossible to read. Data inside the app often contradicts what is shown on the live broadcast. There is a loyal audience, but the product is technically shaky.
評価点：Meteorologists know the local area and give specific forecasts for small towns.
不満点：Radar animation flickers and is unreadable, and data diverges from the same channel's broadcast forecast.
向いている人：Residents of the Columbus, Georgia area loyal to WTVM
An app from a major media company with live meteorologists, 3D radar, and thorough coverage of severe weather events. Temperature accuracy is acceptable, but precipitation forecasts are often wrong, and ad inserts block the interface exactly during storm warnings.
評価点：Professional meteorologists with live broadcasts give better context during a hurricane or tornado than raw data alone.
不満点：Ad videos freeze and block the screen, making the app unusable in a critical situation.
向いている人：FOX News viewers who want weather with editorial commentary
Local Weather Radar is positioned as an all-in-one weather-and-traffic app, but traffic stopped working for many users, the radar often fails to load, and geolocation defaults to New York. When everything works, forecast accuracy is acceptable.
評価点：When the radar works, it is cleaner and easier to read than most competitors.
不満点：No humidity data, traffic is broken for many users, and the radar fails to load when zooming.
向いている人：Users who want weather and traffic in one place
A local TV app with a decent forecast for the Columbia, South Carolina area, but the radar frequently shows a blank map during heavy storms, and tornado notifications have sometimes failed to fire at all.
評価点：Accurate local forecast and a convenient view of precipitation clusters on the map.
不満点：During real severe weather the radar sometimes shows clear skies, and tornado alerts have failed to arrive even with active warnings.
向いている人：Residents in the WIS-TV broadcast area of central South Carolina
For years it provided a reliable forecast and beautiful photo backgrounds, but the radar broke across several consecutive updates and stopped showing precipitation even during an active rain. This is critical for an app that bills itself as a weather tool.
評価点：Clean interface with photos of real places and convenient city switching.
不満点：The radar regularly stops displaying precipitation after updates and takes a long time to recover.
向いている人：Users who value visual presentation and a basic forecast
A local Birmingham app with decent coverage of Alabama storms, but an unstable radar and notifications that either arrive late or cannot be turned off despite the user's settings.
評価点：The local meteorology team provides live broadcasts during Alabama tornadoes.
不満点：Notifications ignore user settings: they arrive at night when Do Not Disturb is on, or arrive 15 minutes late.
向いている人：Residents of Birmingham and Alabama tracking tornado season
An app with a unique niche for tracking rainfall for farmers and agronomists, and when the data matches a physical rain gauge it is irreplaceable. But systematically underreporting actual precipitation by 30-40% compared to physical measurements is the key accuracy problem.
評価点：Historical precipitation data for a specific map point without needing to go check a physical gauge.
不満点：Precipitation data regularly underreports physical gauge readings by a third or more.
向いている人：Farmers and agronomists monitoring plot moisture
The Savannah WTOC with a loyal Low Country audience holds up on a simple interface and reliable storm alerts, but the radar often shows question marks, temperature diverges from reality by 12 degrees after an update, and ads cover the screen.
評価点：Straightforward interface without clutter, which users appreciate compared to overloaded competitors.
不満点：Radar data on the main screen lags two hours behind the radar tab, which is disorienting when tracking a storm.
向いている人：Residents of the Savannah area and the South Carolina coast
A regional weather app for the WDAM zone in Mississippi with a competent meteorology team, but after updates the radar stopped working properly in full-screen mode and weather notifications fire too often for insignificant events.
評価点：Good local coverage and live footage from the team during dangerous weather.
不満点：After an update the radar does not expand to full screen and cuts off the edges of the map.
向いている人：Residents of southern Mississippi loyal to the WDAM channel
The local WPXI channel provides good local alerts for Pittsburgh and the surrounding area, but the radar periodically breaks for weeks at a time, and video forecasts go without updates for several days. Usability has declined after recent redesigns.
評価点：A local meteorologist's live voice explains exactly what is moving toward a specific neighborhood.
不満点：The radar regularly goes offline for extended periods, making the core feature unreliable.
向いている人：Residents of western Pennsylvania who watch WPXI on TV
A feature-rich radar with many layers, but unstable: it freezes when switching maps, data stops pulling without warning, and fire maps do not respond to touch. Locking severe-weather alerts behind a subscription undermines trust.
評価点：A wide selection of radar layers and Dynamic Island integration on iPhone.
不満点：The forecast radar does not work, and the current radar updates inconsistently.
向いている人：Weather enthusiasts willing to tolerate instability for the depth of data
AccuWeather has historically been considered an accuracy leader, and some loyal users confirm this, but after a redesign the app regularly fails to open or freezes on a white screen at exactly the moment dangerous weather strikes.
評価点：Some users consistently call it more accurate than any competitor for their specific location.
不満点：The app crashes and fails to load precisely during a heavy storm, when reliability is needed most.
向いている人：Those who tolerate instability for the sake of an accuracy reputation
A few users noted good forecast accuracy, and one tracked a Pacific typhoon through this radar. But after updates the app stopped loading on iOS 26, and the next-hour forecast was moved behind a paywall in the middle of someone tracking a hurricane.
評価点：The radar covers large areas and lets you track tropical systems.
不満点：The next-hour forecast requires a subscription, and the app fails to load after an iOS update.
向いている人：Enthusiasts who like to track major storms and hurricanes
Weather Underground's strength is hyperlocality through a network of personal weather stations, but the radar visibly lags and forecast accuracy has declined. The app is technically unstable, freezing several times a week.
評価点：Data from neighboring personal weather stations offers precision that large services cannot match.
不満点：The radar lags so much that a storm has already passed by the time the app displays it.
向いている人：Those who care about hyperlocal weather from the PWS network
The basic temperature forecast works, but precipitation accuracy has declined over recent years according to long-term users. The main complaint is that radar was switched to forecast-only mode, removing the ability to view past events.
評価点：Tornado warnings fire and wake users at night. The highest-rated feature in reviews.
不満点：The radar shows only the forward forecast; the ability to review past precipitation was removed.
向いている人：Louisville residents who need severe-weather alerts
WLOX station is trusted along the Gulf Coast for its hurricane-season work, but the app struggles: the futurecast radar freezes halfway through, navigation loops, and videos cut out mid-clip.
評価点：During hurricane season, tornado warnings arrive promptly and cover the entire Gulf Coast.
不満点：The futurecast radar freezes at around 12 of the promised 24 hours, and this issue went unfixed for more than six months.
向いている人：Residents of southern Mississippi and the Gulf Coast
A local TV widget with a decent basic forecast, but the radar frequently gets stuck in the past and does not allow switching modes. Ads block access to data exactly during dangerous weather.
評価点：Humidity is visible right under the temperature without extra scrolling.
不満点：The radar periodically freezes on stale data and does not respond to timeline switching.
向いている人：Residents of the KCRG zone who watch the channel and want its forecast on hand
Beautiful design and broad widget customization attract users, but the radar regularly loads empty, Live Activities are unreliable, and a forced AI block with inaccurate forecasts at the top of the screen irritates even loyal fans.
評価点：Flexible widget customization and a clean interface that looks great on the home screen.
不満点：The radar map frequently loads blank, and Live Activities on the Dynamic Island work intermittently.
向いている人：Those who prioritize a beautiful widget over an accurate forecast
A mature app with a good pollen and air-quality summary, but forecast accuracy is unstable and storm notifications have stopped firing in the background without the app being open.
評価点：A convenient summary with pollen and air-quality indices on one screen.
不満点：Lightning and storm notifications do not arrive in the background, which is critical for people working outdoors.
向いている人：Outdoor workers who need a comprehensive environmental summary
The warning map displayed data that was six months old across multiple refresh attempts, and the real-time radar stops in the past without a subscription and shows no forward forecast. Users from hurricane zones and islands like the format, but concrete evidence of accuracy is scarce.
評価点：A clear storm-track format and intensity scale, convenient for tracking tropical systems.
不満点：Warning data goes stale and does not update, and the live radar is only available in the paid version.
向いている人：Coastal residents tracking hurricane season
Doppler Radar is designed as a simple precipitation-watching tool, but the radar stops updating too often, and in some North American regions the animation does not work at all. When everything works, it is useful for tracking tornadoes.
評価点：When working, it helps track tornadoes and prepare for dangerous weather.
不満点：The radar regularly freezes or shows two-year-old data, especially when zooming the map.
向いている人：Those who live in tornado-prone areas and want a simple radar
KXAN improved its interface in 2025 and loads faster, but ads interrupt video literally after two seconds, and the radar animates too fast with no way to pause it properly. Forecast accuracy is not questioned by loyal users.
評価点：Texas forecast reads quickly; the app launches without delays.
不満点：The radar cannot be studied properly: the animation does not stop, and the timeline is lost when paused.
向いている人：Residents of Austin and central Texas
Some users who have been there a long time praise accuracy, but the specific recurring product problem is that the radar shows data with a 15-20 minute delay instead of real time, making it useless for rapidly developing thunderstorms. One user also received tsunami notifications while 300 miles from the coast.
評価点：Detailed hourly temperature and wind forecast charts in a readable format.
不満点：Radar lags 15-20 minutes behind real time, which is critical during fast-moving thunderstorms.
向いている人：Users for whom a general weather forecast is enough without urgent radar
A local Charlotte channel with a potentially accurate forecast, but the app's technical execution lets it down: the radar freezes mid-animation, weather icons do not match the actual sky ("fair" during total overcast). An ad block before radar in an emergency is a critical flaw.
評価点：For Charlotte residents this is the most accurate local forecast source according to loyal users.
不満点：Weather descriptions do not match reality: "clear" during heavy overcast destroys trust in the forecast.
向いている人：Residents of Charlotte, North Carolina who trust WBTV
Pleasant visuals and hyperlocal forecast for rural areas where the nearest airport station is far away, but accuracy is inconsistent. Radar maps without a legend are nearly useless, and unit settings reset on their own.
評価点：Hyperlocal forecast is useful in remote areas where the nearest weather station is 30 miles away.
不満点：The radar has no color legend, so it is impossible to read precipitation intensity from the map.
向いている人：Farmers and small-town residents in the US Midwest
The app is unstable after updates: it freezes and crashes within the first seconds. Radar has degraded in resolution and loading speed. There is a loyal audience that values the regional specificity of forecasts, but the technical state makes regular use difficult.
評価点：Regional forecasts account for local conditions and help plan fieldwork.
不満点：After updates the app frequently freezes and cannot reopen without restarting the phone.
向いている人：Nebraska residents who have long followed the 10/11 NOW channel
Apple Weather lost its key advantage of hyperlocal forecasting after acquiring Dark Sky: temperature can differ by 10 degrees, and rain goes unregistered during a downpour. The hourly breakdown is formally present, but accuracy has not reached 2019 levels.
評価点：Clean interface and hourly view built directly into the system without extra steps.
不満点：Precipitation forecast is unreliable: zero chance of rain during an actual downpour has been observed repeatedly.
向いている人：iPhone users for whom a rough temperature estimate is enough
The radar does not work on first launch, the interface scrolls in an unfamiliar way, not all cities can be added, and the app does not remember the selected map layer between sessions. Those who are satisfied do not explain specifically what works.
評価点：Detects location immediately on opening without manual input.
不満点：Radar is unreliable, the map resets the selected layer, and city search only works for large settlements.
向いている人：Casual users who only need the current temperature
A local Huntsville app with live streams from local meteorologists, but notifications lag 15 minutes, radar loses tornado-cone layers after updates, and ads block emergency content.
評価点：Live broadcast from local meteorologists during tornado warnings.
不満点：Tornado notifications arrive 15 minutes after the event, when the danger has either passed or become critical.
向いている人：Residents of northern Alabama tracking tornadoes through local meteorologists
A TV channel with a good audience reputation, but the app regularly fails: the radar flickers during real events, and geolocation confuses users in other states with Virginia warnings. When everything works, it is fairly reliable.
評価点：Extreme-weather alerts from local meteorologists trusted for years.
不満点：The radar behaves erratically exactly when it matters most, during active precipitation.
向いている人：Richmond residents and the surrounding area loyal to NBC12
The Memphis WMC5 app declined sharply after recent updates: the radar is broken, voice notifications are gone, and the screen is covered in intrusive ads.
評価点：Previously reliable for tornado and severe-storm warnings in the Memphis area.
不満点：The future radar cuts off at the halfway point on the timeline and does not show the full 24 hours.
向いている人：Greater Memphis residents attached to their home channel
An NHC tropical-storm data aggregator with global coverage, but ads have become so aggressive that users mass-delete the app: there is no way to close an ad and reach the satellite view. The data quality itself, when accessible, remains decent.
評価点：Official hurricane tracks and satellite imagery without editorial filtering.
不満点：Ads with no close button block all data and have no workaround even during an active hurricane.
向いている人：Tropical cyclone watchers willing to endure ads for official NHC data
The app streams NOAA radio stations, but connectivity only works for some regions; many users have seen an error or silence for years instead of a broadcast. Alerts work well for those lucky enough to have coverage, but radio as the core feature is unreliable.
評価点：Where the station is available, storm alerts arrive on time with no extra taps.
不満点：Station coverage is incomplete: Alaska, parts of Texas, Georgia, and other regions cannot connect at all.
向いている人：US residents who have a working NOAA station in their coverage area
The app is marketed as an emergency monitor but systematically fails at the most critical moment: several users describe a tornado passing within a couple of kilometers with no alert. It works correctly sometimes, but the reliability is too unpredictable for an app that safety depends on.
評価点：When an alert fires on time, it is loud enough to wake you up.
不満点：Notifications regularly fail to arrive during active tornado warnings.
向いている人：Those who want an additional alert layer but not as their only warning source
Charlotte's WSOC-TV built a working ZIP-precise alert system and then broke it with an update: tapping a warning now leads to an ad video instead of the text, daily highs diverge from hourly by 14 degrees, and the radar is periodically completely empty.
評価点：ZIP-specific alerts do not bother users with warnings from neighboring counties.
不満点：After an update, the daily and hourly temperature figures diverge significantly with no explanation.
向いている人：Residents of Charlotte and the North Carolina Piedmont
A local WCSC app with a basic forecast for Charleston, but the meteorologist video stream does not play, the radar lags, and a mismatch between hourly and daily data occurs systematically. Ads block access even to tornado alerts.
評価点：The local meteorology team is familiar to the audience and commands trust.
不満点：The radar lags so far that it shows clear skies in the middle of a storm.
向いている人：Live 5 channel viewers in the Charleston, South Carolina area
Geolocation fails regularly: users in one state get warnings for another. Temperature forecast diverges from the National Weather Service, and wind is reportedly understated by a factor of three according to one reviewer. Alert reliability raises serious questions.
評価点：During extreme weather events, when everything works, it helps monitor the situation on the road.
不満点：Geolocation regularly issues warnings for the wrong area; hourly forecasts do not match the radar.
向いている人：WLBT channel audience in Mississippi
The WALB app for southern Georgia fails at the basic task: during actual precipitation and bad weather the radar stops loading data exactly when it is needed. Temperature forecast accuracy is also questioned by the local audience.
評価点：The channel's live broadcast during dangerous events is valued by the few users for whom it loads.
不満点：Radar and geolocation fail precisely during bad weather, when the user is most vulnerable.
向いている人：Residents of southern Georgia who follow the weather through the WALB channel
A basic weather aggregator without its own data expertise that aggressively hides key features behind a paywall. There are almost no real reviews about forecast accuracy, but plenty of complaints about the limited free tier.
評価点：Simple and clean interface for basic needs.
不満点：Hourly forecast and 10-day horizon are locked behind a subscription, making the free version nearly useless.
向いている人：Casual users who only need to know if it will be warm or cold today
The Cape Girardeau KFVS12 station has a good history of storm warnings, but after an update the radar loads intermittently, tornado warnings get buried under reflectivity layers, and ads interrupt viewing during dangerous weather.
評価点：Lightning-fast thunderstorm notifications with a strike point near the user's location.
不満点：The new radar does not show warnings overlaid on reflectivity, making them easy to miss during a storm.
向いている人：Residents of Missouri and Illinois in the KFVS12 broadcast area
The local WIBW channel is useful during tornado season in Kansas, but the app sends excess notifications even to users who configured only emergency alerts, and temperature sometimes gets stuck at a fixed 70 degrees regardless of actual weather.
評価点：Video with the tornado's location marked on the map. A rare and useful feature for prairie regions.
不満点：The notification system is broken: fair-weather alerts arrive instead of the configured emergency warnings.
向いている人：Kansas residents following tornado season
The radar updates with a delay of several minutes, so a storm arrives before the map shows it. Users get alerts for neighboring counties with no way to configure the zone, and ads interrupt viewing during an emergency.
評価点：Early severe-weather warnings sometimes beat the default Apple app.
不満点：The radar lags several minutes behind real conditions.
向いている人：Residents of southern Wisconsin following the WMTV15 channel
Once a strong brand with a wide data network, now turned into an ad showcase. The radar regularly fails to load, and precipitation forecasts contradict reality right in the middle of rain.
評価点：Thunderstorm and lightning alerts are valued by those who work or spend time outdoors.
不満点：Precipitation forecast is wrong even within a six-hour window; radar freezes on a good connection.
向いている人：Background weather browsing without serious plans
Cincinnati's FOX19 has a history of accurate forecasts, but now it is overloaded: notifications wake users at night for minor events, the 24-hour radar has been showing only 12 hours for more than a year, and false rain alerts during clear skies have eroded trust.
評価点：Step-by-step hourly forecast with temperature by time of day is well structured.
不満点：Notifications fire for rain and storms that are not near the user's location.
向いている人：FOX19 viewers in the greater Cincinnati area
KSAT 12 Weather was San Antonio's favorite for its convenient radar and accurate warnings, but after the redesign ads cover the interface, the radar became harder to read, and the app fails to open for some users. The meteorology team's reputation holds; the app's quality does not.
評価点：The KSAT meteorology team covers dangerous situations quickly and commands high trust among local audiences.
不満点：After the redesign it is impossible to scroll through the forecast without a pop-up ad, and the radar lost its future time range.
向いている人：San Antonio residents who already watch KSAT 12 on TV
The Lexington WKYT channel has a loyal audience, but the app is nearly unusable: constant crashes, a radar with an overlay you cannot remove, broken forecast notifications, and video that does not play.
評価点：The extended forecast and radar observations are accurate enough for week-ahead planning.
不満点：Notifications redirect to an ad video instead of the warning text, losing critical seconds during dangerous weather.
向いている人：WKYT viewers in central Kentucky
Visually one of the most beautiful weather apps with excellent photography, but the functional core is weak: the radar shows only the past with no forward forecast, rain forecasts miss active precipitation, and launch takes an unacceptably long time.
評価点：Stunning photography and an atmospheric design that people pay for even knowing about the weak forecast.
不満点：The radar shows no forward precipitation movement, and the rain forecast misses active downpours.
向いている人：Those who value aesthetics over forecast accuracy
The app fails at the basics: it cannot find geolocation on newer iPhones, the forecast reportedly does not match reality across several reviews, and the interface is hard to navigate. The one positive noted by a user is a one-off wind accuracy win.
評価点：One user noted that the wind forecast was more accurate than Weather Channel.
不満点：Geolocation does not work on modern iPhones, and forecast accuracy is supported only by isolated cases.
向いている人：Not recommended for anyone in its current state
Temperature does not update in real time and requires a forced restart, there is no radar function at all, and the app adds foreign cities to the saved list without user permission. A pretty picture with a broken engine.
評価点：Attractive design and animated backgrounds that appeal to those who value the visual side.
不満点：Temperature does not refresh on its own, there is no radar, and the city list gets polluted with unwanted locations.
向いている人：Someone who wants a beautiful widget on screen rather than an accurate forecast
The app missed tornado warnings and gave weather for a neighboring city instead of the actual location. The radar redirected users to another continent, and the interface is cluttered with fake virus-warning ads.
評価点：A broad set of weather data from NOAA sources.
不満点：Geolocation often locks onto a neighboring, larger weather station rather than the user's actual location.
向いている人：Those willing to tolerate ads for raw NOAA data
A NOAA radar in a beautiful shell but with slow image loading and a weak free feature set. The paid version does not meet expectations for a significant share of buyers.
評価点：Detailed fire-risk conditions and atmospheric indicators.
不満点：Radar images load so slowly that the picture is already outdated by the time it appears.
向いている人：Users who want official NOAA data in a polished wrapper
Temperature diverges from reality by 5-10 degrees Fahrenheit, the widget shows wrong values, and the radar does not match other systems. No strong points could be identified from the reviews.
評価点：Some users like the visual readability of the in-app map.
不満点：Precipitation forecast regularly does not match what is happening outside.
向いている人：A random audience with no distinct profile
The Chattanooga Local 3 app has a team that viewers value personally, but the product itself lags seriously: the radar is often blank on opening, the forecast changes several times a day, and ads cover the screen during storms.
評価点：The local meteorology team issues early tornado warnings that users say have saved lives.
不満点：The next-day forecast often does not match reality, and the app itself acknowledges this through frequent revisions.
向いている人：Local residents of the Chattanooga and northern Alabama area
A beautiful interface hides an unreliable weather model: temperature diverges from reality by 10 degrees or more, the apparent temperature shows physically impossible values, and radar layers remain gray instead of showing data.
評価点：Visually pleasant layout with golden-hour and moon-phase times. Appealing to photographers and nature lovers.
不満点：Temperature forecast systematically diverges from the actual reading by tens of degrees for users across different countries.
向いている人：Those who want a pretty picture rather than an accurate forecast
A local Detroit app that a poor redesign destroyed: the radar lost forward-scrolling, navigation became confusing, and ads turned aggressive. Users are leaving in numbers, but the historical rating holds.
評価点：Previously offered the best local radar with a 2-hour forward forecast.
不満点：The radar shows only the past and present; forward scrolling is gone.
向いている人：Detroit residents who have not yet found a replacement
The forecast changes with every opening, and during 6% rain probability a paid subscriber may experience a real downpour. Temperature on the globe diverges from temperature on another screen within the same app. That is a basic inconsistency.
評価点：The visual presentation on a rotating globe is memorable and eye-catching.
不満点：The forecast does not update when real weather changes; it shows stale data.
向いている人：Users attracted by the visual format rather than accuracy
Built for looks, not for weather: widgets freeze on one temperature for weeks, and users explicitly write that the data does not match reality. Forecast accuracy is not a product value here.
評価点：Visual themes, animations, and home-screen customization.
不満点：Widgets do not refresh in the background and show stale temperatures.
向いている人：Those who decorate their phone rather than track the weather
Forecasts diverge from actual temperature, days of the week are displayed incorrectly, and the hourly forecast is not tied to local time. Visually pleasant but unreliable as a forecasting tool.
評価点：Attractive radar graphics that are pleasant to browse even without a subscription.
不満点：Multi-day forecasts regularly show the wrong day of the week and incorrect temperatures.
向いている人：Not seriously suitable for anyone in its current state
Aggressively monetized with ads on the launch screen, forecasts confuse precipitation with cloudiness, and unit settings do not save. No competitive advantages in forecasting are apparent.
評価点：Basic daily forecast loads quickly without extra screens.
不満点：Precipitation forecast is unreliable: users document "cloudy" during rain and vice versa.
向いている人：Arguably no one; better free alternatives exist
アプリを比べる助けにはなりますが、自分の課題で確かめることの代わりにはなりません。
レビュー本文についてのinAppのリサーチから保存されたスコアです。アーカイブ内でのアプリ全体の評価であり、個々の機能の信頼性の点数ではありません。
データを集めた時点のアプリページの評価です。現在の評価やバージョンは異なる場合があります。
このテーマのアーカイブ標本：アプリ92件、読んだレビュー24,055件。これはリサーチ全体の規模であり、アプリごとのレビュー数ではありません。
評価の差は不正な操作の証拠にはなりません。算出日とスコアの詳しい方法はモバイル版のアーカイブに含まれていません。課題の説明と元の引用を見比べ、条件は現在のバージョンで確かめてください。
レビューが結論になるまでコーパス、トピック、ラベル付けの限界評価と結論は保存されたレビューにもとづきます。アプリの現在のバージョンは変わっている場合があります。
