Note des avis : 84 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,9★ · 6 574 notes
84sur 100
One of the few weather aggregators that lets you choose your forecast source from multiple models. Users report genuine accuracy in tricky regions and call it the best they found after a long search for a Weather Channel alternative.
Points forts
The ability to switch between weather data providers and the complete absence of ads.
Reproches
The home-screen widget does not always refresh without manually opening the app.
Pour qui : Users who want control over their data source and cannot tolerate ads
Note des avis : 74 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 76 960 notes
74sur 100
For aviation, sailing, and cycling it delivers detailed wind layers, water temperature, and tropical-system data with multi-day accuracy that users have verified in the field. The main product issue is that the forecast model slider sometimes lags behind the selected hour, which matters when timing is critical.
Points forts
Multi-layer wind forecasts by altitude and tropical-system accuracy four to five days out.
Reproches
The timeline slider can fall out of sync with the actual model hour, introducing error when precise timing matters.
Pour qui : Pilots, sailors, and anyone planning outdoor activities
Note des avis : 70 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 36 575 notes
70sur 100
Zoom Earth stands out with its global satellite map and an excellent hurricane tracker; the forecast is accurate enough for general use. After radar was removed in one update some users left, but the core value for tracking large systems remained.
Points forts
The best tool for watching hurricanes and storms at a global scale, all in one tap.
Reproches
No legend for the layers, impossible to zoom in to street level, and the hurricane track forecast sometimes diverges from the consensus cone.
Pour qui : Global weather enthusiasts, hurricane chasers, and travelers
Rang 4. Note des avis : 68 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 302 583 notes
68sur 100
A compact app with solid alerts and a clean forecast layout that loyal users call their primary choice. The sample size is too small for confident conclusions on overall accuracy, but there are almost no specific complaints about forecast errors.
Points forts : Timely alerts for approaching storms and a convenient hourly navigation.
Reproches : Occasionally fails to load for no visible reason; the radar timeline does not start from the current moment.
Pour qui : Users who want a simple, quiet daily forecast
Rang 5. Note des avis : 68 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 85 875 notes
68sur 100
One of the few apps where users describe real use cases: navigating CarPlay through a tornado warning zone, precise severe-weather alerts, access to ensemble forecasts and SPC data. Forecast accuracy is rated good in reviews; the main product issue is that location does not switch automatically when traveling.
Points forts : A unique combination of professional-grade data (ensemble, SPC) with a fun character and a clean interface.
Reproches : Location does not update automatically when moving from city to city; requires manual correction.
Pour qui : Power users who want serious data and a polished interface
Rang 6. Note des avis : 65 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 35 250 notes
65sur 100
Ventusky offers a rich set of meteorological layers and is useful for professional planning, but wind accuracy has degraded, sometimes showing five times less than actual speed, and the cluttered post-redesign interface makes navigation harder. Good for those who know how to read pressure charts.
Points forts : Indispensable for offshore planning and aviation: the 14-day forecast with fronts and precipitation holds up.
Reproches : Wind speed can differ from reality by a factor of several, which is dangerous for marine and aviation operations.
Pour qui : Pilots, offshore professionals, and weather enthusiasts
Rang 7. Note des avis : 63 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 53 758 notes
63sur 100
Weather Puppy delivers a reasonably accurate forecast via Foreca and Apple Weather, but it remains a dog-themed app rather than a serious weather tool. The radar occasionally shows a thunderstorm where the sky is clear.
Points forts : Forecast accuracy is quite decent, and the app lifts your mood from the first second.
Reproches : The radar periodically shows precipitation that does not exist, and the bark notification does not always fire at the scheduled time.
Pour qui : Those who want a forecast with personality rather than raw tables
Rang 8. Note des avis : 63 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 12 074 notes
63sur 100
A clean, ad-free interface layered over NWS data, with a forecast discussion forum. Accuracy is good in spring and summer, slightly weaker in winter. The most honest minimalism in the segment.
Points forts : The NWS forecaster Forecast Discussion is the most informative text forecast available, something no other app offers.
Reproches : Zone and acronym navigation is opaque for newcomers, and switching regions takes extra steps.
Pour qui : US users who want raw NWS data without extra layers
Rang 9. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 72 446 notes
62sur 100
Windy.app is more accurate than most competitors for wind and waves in active outdoor sports, but the free tier is heavily limited and forecast accuracy is unstable at low speeds. Its strong niche is marine navigation, fishing, and kitesurfing.
Points forts : Out of nine wind apps on the phone, this one holds up better than the rest, especially for getting out on the water.
Reproches : Wind forecasts at low speeds (7-10 mph) often miss reality; leaves don't move where a breeze was promised.
Rang 10. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 16 693 notes
62sur 100
One of the few apps where users praise both accuracy and readability, not just design. Severe-weather warnings work. The weak point is that widgets were moved behind a paywall, cutting practical value for part of the audience.
Points forts : The animated layout makes weather instantly clear rather than a boring table.
Reproches : Without a subscription there is no home-screen widget, and the widget is the main use case for a weather app.
Pour qui : Users who value visual readability over raw numbers
Rang 11. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 8 532 notes
62sur 100
One of the most data-dense weather aggregators, with earthquakes, radar, and detailed animation, but the iOS version noticeably lags behind Android in quality. Some users report a systematic temperature offset of 8-10 degrees.
Points forts : The breadth of data is impressive: weather, radar, earthquakes, and geomagnetic activity in one app.
Reproches : Temperature forecast accuracy is inconsistent: some users see a constant offset of 8-10 degrees from real values.
Pour qui : Weather enthusiasts who need many data layers on one screen
Rang 12. Note des avis : 62 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 6 792 notes
62sur 100
Users trust the local meteorologists and value accuracy for specific neighborhoods, but severe-weather alerts cover the entire broadcast zone without filtering by location. The app runs on trust in the TV team rather than on technology.
Points forts : Video forecasts from familiar meteorologists tied to a specific local area.
Reproches : No location filtering for alerts: warnings come in for the entire broadcast region.
Pour qui : Residents of the WSAZ broadcast area in West Virginia and Kentucky
Rang 13. Note des avis : 61 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 15 487 notes
61sur 100
A beautiful clock widget with a live globe and a reasonably accurate forecast, but the version 4.20 redesign traded simplicity for an overloaded screen and removed the temperature badge.
Points forts : The animated Earth with clouds gives an intuitive sense of what is coming from the west.
Reproches : No radar at all, and the hourly forecast became an unreadable chart with tiny numbers after the update.
Pour qui : Those who want beautiful lock-screen widgets
Rang 14. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 60 496 notes
58sur 100
Windfinder is good as a specialized tool for sailors and surfers, but wind and wave accuracy has degraded over recent years and is now reliable in roughly half of cases. Not for anyone who just needs basic temperatures.
Points forts : No trip on the water without it: it picks the best days well and keeps routes free of surprises.
Reproches : Wind speed and direction increasingly diverge from reality, and wave height disappeared from several locations after the last update.
Rang 15. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 27 805 notes
58sur 100
Tomorrow.io outperforms most competitors on hyperlocal precipitation forecasts tied to exact map coordinates, but the 10-day forecast is unstable, sunrise/sunset times show an offset, and push notifications regularly fail to fire.
Points forts : Precipitation forecast is tied to precise coordinates rather than the city as a whole, which matters most in areas with complex terrain.
Reproches : The daily and hourly forecasts sometimes contradict each other, which is confusing when planning.
Pour qui : Those for whom it matters whether rain will fall here in the next hour
Rang 16. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 22 432 notes
58sur 100
The app's strength is local wind and tide data; anglers have praised wind accuracy for years. The weak spot is precipitation: the daily rain icon does not change even when the sun is actually shining, which is confusing.
Points forts : Wind speed and direction forecast more accurate than most competitors.
Reproches : The all-day cloud icon does not reflect actual weather changes throughout the day.
Pour qui : Anglers and outdoor enthusiasts for whom wind and tide matter
Rang 17. Note des avis : 58 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 10 936 notes
58sur 100
The app is valued for its graphical precipitation accuracy and an honest 14-day horizon without extra noise. The hourly forecast periodically breaks and shows only one time slot, making it a useless widget until the next refresh.
Points forts : Accurate precipitation figures without panic or unnecessary dramatization.
Reproches : The hourly forecast sometimes collapses to a single 1 a.m. row and stops updating without a reinstall.
Pour qui : Those planning trips, outdoor work, or farming tasks two weeks out
Rang 18. Note des avis : 56 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 12 084 notes
56sur 100
The Weather Network was once known for its accuracy in Canada and precipitation detail, but after a redesign and a data breach accuracy declined, the font got smaller, and ads became more prominent. For trail and climbing outdoor activity, precipitation detail is still among the best.
Points forts : Precipitation detail helps you stay on the route or leave it at exactly the right moment.
Reproches : After the redesign forecast accuracy got worse, and the side menu opens and closes on its own.
Pour qui : Canadian users and outdoor enthusiasts who need a detailed precipitation map
Rang 19. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 1 071 925 notes
55sur 100
A solid radar base using NOAA data with a minimalist map interface, but monetization has degraded to scam banners that open phishing sites and to aggressive upgrade prompts.
Points forts : A clean radar screen without extra layers, reliable for tracking hurricanes and thunderstorms.
Reproches : In-app ad banners link to phishing sites warning of viruses on your device.
Pour qui : Real-time radar fans who can tolerate aggressive monetization
Rang 20. Note des avis : 55 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 30 477 notes
55sur 100
The best radar-focused app for precipitation visualization quality and widget flexibility. The main downside is connection drops during critical moments and weak temperature accuracy.
Points forts : Flexible widgets with radar zoom control and the ability to toggle between multiple data types in one widget.
Reproches : The server loses connection precisely during serious storms, when the app is needed most.
Pour qui : Those who want a clean radar with no clutter and good widgets
Rang 21. Note des avis : 54 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 12 667 notes
54sur 100
A companion app for a personal Ambient weather station: it shows your real data with backyard-level precision rather than the nearest official station. The weak spot is a fussy connection and a confusing interface when moving or changing routers.
Points forts : Hyperlocal readings from your own equipment in real time, accessible remotely from anywhere.
Reproches : When switching internet providers or routers, sync breaks and does not recover without complex troubleshooting.
Pour qui : Owners of Ambient Weather personal weather stations
Rang 22. Note des avis : 54 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 6 121 notes
54sur 100
The app appeals to serious weather watchers: good fronts, a format useful for anglers and travelers. But temperature accuracy drifts up to 15 degrees, storm notifications arrive one to two hours late, and widgets and watch complications periodically stop updating without user intervention.
Points forts : The weather-front map and rich data set for those who want the full picture.
Reproches : Severe-weather alerts arrive noticeably late; widgets lose sync and show stale temperatures.
Pour qui : Nature lovers and anglers who want detailed summaries
Rang 23. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 1 044 178 notes
52sur 100
Live NOAA radar focused on severe weather: users in tornado-prone and snowy regions report noticeably better accuracy than competitors. The weak spot is an alert system that cries wolf with false alarms and misses real events.
Points forts : Snow and front movement are displayed more accurately than most alternatives for mountain and plains regions of the US.
Reproches : Storm alerts fire unpredictably: panic with no real threat, then silence during an actual hurricane.
Pour qui : Residents of storm-prone US regions who need raw NOAA radar
Rang 24. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 29 041 notes
52sur 100
WeatherBug Elite built a loyal audience over years of accurate performance, but the past year or two show growing technical debt: radar delayed by 10+ minutes, non-working notifications on iOS 26, and a freezing interface.
Points forts : Lightning alerts and the observer-station network have historically been more accurate than competitors.
Reproches : Radar and lightning notifications lag by 10 or more minutes, which is critical when hiking or riding a motorcycle.
Pour qui : Long-time users willing to accept technical shortcomings for the sake of a familiar interface
Rang 25. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 16 923 notes
52sur 100
Solid basic forecast and a meteorology team that the audience genuinely trusts. The main technical issue is that the radar updates every 15 minutes instead of real time, and recent updates removed the ability to view past data.
Points forts : Local Region 8 meteorologists monitor severe weather and issue early warnings.
Reproches : Radar lags 15 minutes behind and shows no precipitation history, only forward forecast.
Pour qui : Residents of Arkansas (Region 8), especially during tornado season
Rang 26. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 15 909 notes
52sur 100
A marine-specialized NOAA data aggregator with useful planning tools, but buoys are often offline, radar is patchy in some areas, and key data (water temperature) is locked behind a paywall.
Points forts : Point forecast directly on the water map and access to NOAA data without extra steps.
Reproches : Buoy data is regularly unavailable, and the wave forecast lags one to two days behind reality.
Pour qui : Anglers and sailors near the US coastline
Rang 27. Note des avis : 52 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 7 364 notes
52sur 100
There is a core of users who praise wind-speed and temperature accuracy, but several independent reviews note discrepancies from reality of 5 degrees or more, and alerts do not fire during snowstorms. Accuracy is inconsistent.
Points forts : Wind-speed and temperature data are considered among the most accurate compared to competitors.
Reproches : Current conditions often do not match what is happening outside.
Pour qui : Those for whom wind matters, such as cyclists or sailors
Rang 28. Note des avis : 50 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 24 283 notes
50sur 100
First Alert 4 from KSDK provides reasonably accurate warnings for the St. Louis area, but ads interrupt live streams during emergency storms, and radar plus notifications periodically break after updates.
Points forts : Steve Templeton's voice alerts fire even at night and genuinely warn of dangerous storms.
Reproches : Ads appear during a live tornado broadcast, blocking information about location and direction.
Pour qui : Residents of the St. Louis area during tornado season
Rang 29. Note des avis : 49 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 113 087 notes
49sur 100
Historically a reliable tool for tracking tornadoes and severe weather with text-to-speech notifications, but now notifications arrive with no data inside the app, and during an actual tornado warning the phone alert and the in-app alert did not match. For a safety app this is a critical failure.
Points forts : Text-to-speech notifications and the ability to monitor several saved cities on one screen.
Reproches : Severe-weather notifications arrive, but when you open the app there is no data inside.
Pour qui : Residents of tornado-prone areas who need instant alerts
Rang 30. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 45 913 notes
48sur 100
WSB-TV Weather has historically provided accurate forecasts for Atlanta and was valued for timely alerts, but after a redesign the radar started lagging 5-15 minutes and storm notifications arrive after the storm has already passed. This is critical for a tornado-prone region.
Points forts : The WSB meteorology team remains one of the most reliable for forecast accuracy in Georgia.
Reproches : Lightning and tornado notifications arrive 20-30 minutes after the event, making them useless for safety.
Pour qui : Residents of Atlanta and Georgia who trust WSB-TV
Rang 31. Note des avis : 48 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 8 917 notes
48sur 100
The main value is the sarcastic commentary on the forecast, not the forecast itself: temperature sometimes differs from reality by 10 degrees and there is no radar at all. After a change of ownership the app lost its voice pack and started nagging users for tracking consent.
Points forts : Snarky captions on the weather brighten even the gloomiest day.
Reproches : No built-in radar, and temperature diverges noticeably from reality during rapid weather changes.
Pour qui : Those who want a laugh in the morning and check accurate forecasts in a different app
Rang 32. Note des avis : 47 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 116 071 notes
47sur 100
Before a major update it was one of the best trackers with accurate precipitation forecasting, but after the redesign radar animation freezes, lightning alerts fire, and the rain forecast began producing errors of 3 inches at zero actual precipitation after an AI feature was introduced. Long-term users note a concrete decline in accuracy.
Points forts : Real-time lightning warnings and detailed future radar before the update.
Reproches : After the redesign the map animation freezes, and precipitation forecast accuracy dropped after the AI feature was added.
Pour qui : Weather enthusiasts willing to work through a complex interface
Rang 33. Note des avis : 47 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 8 331 notes
47sur 100
KPLC is rightfully considered the most accurate forecast for southwest Louisiana, but the radar periodically shows no precipitation even during a downpour, and notifications arrive overnight for events that are no longer relevant. Navigation became uncomfortable after the redesign.
Points forts : Local meteorologists hit the forecast for Louisiana where national services miss.
Reproches : The radar sometimes shows clear skies during an active downpour directly overhead.
Pour qui : Residents of southwest Louisiana, especially during hurricane season
Rang 34. Note des avis : 47 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 6 505 notes
47sur 100
The radar is unstable after updates and flickers so fast that the picture is impossible to read. Data inside the app often contradicts what is shown on the live broadcast. There is a loyal audience, but the product is technically shaky.
Points forts : Meteorologists know the local area and give specific forecasts for small towns.
Reproches : Radar animation flickers and is unreadable, and data diverges from the same channel's broadcast forecast.
Pour qui : Residents of the Columbus, Georgia area loyal to WTVM
Rang 35. Note des avis : 45 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 360 482 notes
45sur 100
An app from a major media company with live meteorologists, 3D radar, and thorough coverage of severe weather events. Temperature accuracy is acceptable, but precipitation forecasts are often wrong, and ad inserts block the interface exactly during storm warnings.
Points forts : Professional meteorologists with live broadcasts give better context during a hurricane or tornado than raw data alone.
Reproches : Ad videos freeze and block the screen, making the app unusable in a critical situation.
Pour qui : FOX News viewers who want weather with editorial commentary
Rang 36. Note des avis : 45 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 34 062 notes
45sur 100
Local Weather Radar is positioned as an all-in-one weather-and-traffic app, but traffic stopped working for many users, the radar often fails to load, and geolocation defaults to New York. When everything works, forecast accuracy is acceptable.
Points forts : When the radar works, it is cleaner and easier to read than most competitors.
Reproches : No humidity data, traffic is broken for many users, and the radar fails to load when zooming.
Pour qui : Users who want weather and traffic in one place
Rang 37. Note des avis : 45 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 12 618 notes
45sur 100
A local TV app with a decent forecast for the Columbia, South Carolina area, but the radar frequently shows a blank map during heavy storms, and tornado notifications have sometimes failed to fire at all.
Points forts : Accurate local forecast and a convenient view of precipitation clusters on the map.
Reproches : During real severe weather the radar sometimes shows clear skies, and tornado alerts have failed to arrive even with active warnings.
Pour qui : Residents in the WIS-TV broadcast area of central South Carolina
Rang 38. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 190 471 notes
44sur 100
For years it provided a reliable forecast and beautiful photo backgrounds, but the radar broke across several consecutive updates and stopped showing precipitation even during an active rain. This is critical for an app that bills itself as a weather tool.
Points forts : Clean interface with photos of real places and convenient city switching.
Reproches : The radar regularly stops displaying precipitation after updates and takes a long time to recover.
Pour qui : Users who value visual presentation and a basic forecast
Rang 39. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 28 510 notes
44sur 100
A local Birmingham app with decent coverage of Alabama storms, but an unstable radar and notifications that either arrive late or cannot be turned off despite the user's settings.
Points forts : The local meteorology team provides live broadcasts during Alabama tornadoes.
Reproches : Notifications ignore user settings: they arrive at night when Do Not Disturb is on, or arrive 15 minutes late.
Pour qui : Residents of Birmingham and Alabama tracking tornado season
Rang 40. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 19 566 notes
44sur 100
An app with a unique niche for tracking rainfall for farmers and agronomists, and when the data matches a physical rain gauge it is irreplaceable. But systematically underreporting actual precipitation by 30-40% compared to physical measurements is the key accuracy problem.
Points forts : Historical precipitation data for a specific map point without needing to go check a physical gauge.
Reproches : Precipitation data regularly underreports physical gauge readings by a third or more.
Pour qui : Farmers and agronomists monitoring plot moisture
Rang 41. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 13 148 notes
44sur 100
The Savannah WTOC with a loyal Low Country audience holds up on a simple interface and reliable storm alerts, but the radar often shows question marks, temperature diverges from reality by 12 degrees after an update, and ads cover the screen.
Points forts : Straightforward interface without clutter, which users appreciate compared to overloaded competitors.
Reproches : Radar data on the main screen lags two hours behind the radar tab, which is disorienting when tracking a storm.
Pour qui : Residents of the Savannah area and the South Carolina coast
Rang 42. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 11 126 notes
44sur 100
A regional weather app for the WDAM zone in Mississippi with a competent meteorology team, but after updates the radar stopped working properly in full-screen mode and weather notifications fire too often for insignificant events.
Points forts : Good local coverage and live footage from the team during dangerous weather.
Reproches : After an update the radar does not expand to full screen and cuts off the edges of the map.
Pour qui : Residents of southern Mississippi loyal to the WDAM channel
Rang 43. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 9 032 notes
44sur 100
The local WPXI channel provides good local alerts for Pittsburgh and the surrounding area, but the radar periodically breaks for weeks at a time, and video forecasts go without updates for several days. Usability has declined after recent redesigns.
Points forts : A local meteorologist's live voice explains exactly what is moving toward a specific neighborhood.
Reproches : The radar regularly goes offline for extended periods, making the core feature unreliable.
Pour qui : Residents of western Pennsylvania who watch WPXI on TV
Rang 44. Note des avis : 44 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,4★ · 7 248 notes
44sur 100
A feature-rich radar with many layers, but unstable: it freezes when switching maps, data stops pulling without warning, and fire maps do not respond to touch. Locking severe-weather alerts behind a subscription undermines trust.
Points forts : A wide selection of radar layers and Dynamic Island integration on iPhone.
Reproches : The forecast radar does not work, and the current radar updates inconsistently.
Pour qui : Weather enthusiasts willing to tolerate instability for the depth of data
Rang 45. Note des avis : 43 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 1 496 296 notes
43sur 100
AccuWeather has historically been considered an accuracy leader, and some loyal users confirm this, but after a redesign the app regularly fails to open or freezes on a white screen at exactly the moment dangerous weather strikes.
Points forts : Some users consistently call it more accurate than any competitor for their specific location.
Reproches : The app crashes and fails to load precisely during a heavy storm, when reliability is needed most.
Pour qui : Those who tolerate instability for the sake of an accuracy reputation
Rang 46. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 250 443 notes
42sur 100
A few users noted good forecast accuracy, and one tracked a Pacific typhoon through this radar. But after updates the app stopped loading on iOS 26, and the next-hour forecast was moved behind a paywall in the middle of someone tracking a hurricane.
Points forts : The radar covers large areas and lets you track tropical systems.
Reproches : The next-hour forecast requires a subscription, and the app fails to load after an iOS update.
Pour qui : Enthusiasts who like to track major storms and hurricanes
Rang 47. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 3,9★ · 31 516 notes
42sur 100
Weather Underground's strength is hyperlocality through a network of personal weather stations, but the radar visibly lags and forecast accuracy has declined. The app is technically unstable, freezing several times a week.
Points forts : Data from neighboring personal weather stations offers precision that large services cannot match.
Reproches : The radar lags so much that a storm has already passed by the time the app displays it.
Pour qui : Those who care about hyperlocal weather from the PWS network
Rang 48. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 20 132 notes
42sur 100
The basic temperature forecast works, but precipitation accuracy has declined over recent years according to long-term users. The main complaint is that radar was switched to forecast-only mode, removing the ability to view past events.
Points forts : Tornado warnings fire and wake users at night. The highest-rated feature in reviews.
Reproches : The radar shows only the forward forecast; the ability to review past precipitation was removed.
Pour qui : Louisville residents who need severe-weather alerts
Rang 49. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 13 293 notes
42sur 100
WLOX station is trusted along the Gulf Coast for its hurricane-season work, but the app struggles: the futurecast radar freezes halfway through, navigation loops, and videos cut out mid-clip.
Points forts : During hurricane season, tornado warnings arrive promptly and cover the entire Gulf Coast.
Reproches : The futurecast radar freezes at around 12 of the promised 24 hours, and this issue went unfixed for more than six months.
Pour qui : Residents of southern Mississippi and the Gulf Coast
Rang 50. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 13 083 notes
42sur 100
A local TV widget with a decent basic forecast, but the radar frequently gets stuck in the past and does not allow switching modes. Ads block access to data exactly during dangerous weather.
Points forts : Humidity is visible right under the temperature without extra scrolling.
Reproches : The radar periodically freezes on stale data and does not respond to timeline switching.
Pour qui : Residents of the KCRG zone who watch the channel and want its forecast on hand
Rang 51. Note des avis : 42 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 5 838 notes
42sur 100
Beautiful design and broad widget customization attract users, but the radar regularly loads empty, Live Activities are unreliable, and a forced AI block with inaccurate forecasts at the top of the screen irritates even loyal fans.
Points forts : Flexible widget customization and a clean interface that looks great on the home screen.
Reproches : The radar map frequently loads blank, and Live Activities on the Dynamic Island work intermittently.
Pour qui : Those who prioritize a beautiful widget over an accurate forecast
Rang 52. Note des avis : 41 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 2 165 372 notes
41sur 100
A mature app with a good pollen and air-quality summary, but forecast accuracy is unstable and storm notifications have stopped firing in the background without the app being open.
Points forts : A convenient summary with pollen and air-quality indices on one screen.
Reproches : Lightning and storm notifications do not arrive in the background, which is critical for people working outdoors.
Pour qui : Outdoor workers who need a comprehensive environmental summary
Rang 53. Note des avis : 41 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 81 944 notes
41sur 100
The warning map displayed data that was six months old across multiple refresh attempts, and the real-time radar stops in the past without a subscription and shows no forward forecast. Users from hurricane zones and islands like the format, but concrete evidence of accuracy is scarce.
Points forts : A clear storm-track format and intensity scale, convenient for tracking tropical systems.
Reproches : Warning data goes stale and does not update, and the live radar is only available in the paid version.
Pour qui : Coastal residents tracking hurricane season
Rang 54. Note des avis : 41 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 37 913 notes
41sur 100
Doppler Radar is designed as a simple precipitation-watching tool, but the radar stops updating too often, and in some North American regions the animation does not work at all. When everything works, it is useful for tracking tornadoes.
Points forts : When working, it helps track tornadoes and prepare for dangerous weather.
Reproches : The radar regularly freezes or shows two-year-old data, especially when zooming the map.
Pour qui : Those who live in tornado-prone areas and want a simple radar
Rang 55. Note des avis : 41 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 8 721 notes
41sur 100
KXAN improved its interface in 2025 and loads faster, but ads interrupt video literally after two seconds, and the radar animates too fast with no way to pause it properly. Forecast accuracy is not questioned by loyal users.
Points forts : Texas forecast reads quickly; the app launches without delays.
Reproches : The radar cannot be studied properly: the animation does not stop, and the timeline is lost when paused.
Rang 56. Note des avis : 40 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 76 590 notes
40sur 100
Some users who have been there a long time praise accuracy, but the specific recurring product problem is that the radar shows data with a 15-20 minute delay instead of real time, making it useless for rapidly developing thunderstorms. One user also received tsunami notifications while 300 miles from the coast.
Points forts : Detailed hourly temperature and wind forecast charts in a readable format.
Reproches : Radar lags 15-20 minutes behind real time, which is critical during fast-moving thunderstorms.
Pour qui : Users for whom a general weather forecast is enough without urgent radar
Rang 57. Note des avis : 40 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 16 254 notes
40sur 100
A local Charlotte channel with a potentially accurate forecast, but the app's technical execution lets it down: the radar freezes mid-animation, weather icons do not match the actual sky ("fair" during total overcast). An ad block before radar in an emergency is a critical flaw.
Points forts : For Charlotte residents this is the most accurate local forecast source according to loyal users.
Reproches : Weather descriptions do not match reality: "clear" during heavy overcast destroys trust in the forecast.
Pour qui : Residents of Charlotte, North Carolina who trust WBTV
Rang 58. Note des avis : 40 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 8 964 notes
40sur 100
Pleasant visuals and hyperlocal forecast for rural areas where the nearest airport station is far away, but accuracy is inconsistent. Radar maps without a legend are nearly useless, and unit settings reset on their own.
Points forts : Hyperlocal forecast is useful in remote areas where the nearest weather station is 30 miles away.
Reproches : The radar has no color legend, so it is impossible to read precipitation intensity from the map.
Pour qui : Farmers and small-town residents in the US Midwest
Rang 59. Note des avis : 40 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 6 124 notes
40sur 100
The app is unstable after updates: it freezes and crashes within the first seconds. Radar has degraded in resolution and loading speed. There is a loyal audience that values the regional specificity of forecasts, but the technical state makes regular use difficult.
Points forts : Regional forecasts account for local conditions and help plan fieldwork.
Reproches : After updates the app frequently freezes and cannot reopen without restarting the phone.
Pour qui : Nebraska residents who have long followed the 10/11 NOW channel
Rang 60. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 1 730 631 notes
38sur 100
Apple Weather lost its key advantage of hyperlocal forecasting after acquiring Dark Sky: temperature can differ by 10 degrees, and rain goes unregistered during a downpour. The hourly breakdown is formally present, but accuracy has not reached 2019 levels.
Points forts : Clean interface and hourly view built directly into the system without extra steps.
Reproches : Precipitation forecast is unreliable: zero chance of rain during an actual downpour has been observed repeatedly.
Pour qui : iPhone users for whom a rough temperature estimate is enough
Rang 61. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 262 463 notes
38sur 100
The radar does not work on first launch, the interface scrolls in an unfamiliar way, not all cities can be added, and the app does not remember the selected map layer between sessions. Those who are satisfied do not explain specifically what works.
Points forts : Detects location immediately on opening without manual input.
Reproches : Radar is unreliable, the map resets the selected layer, and city search only works for large settlements.
Pour qui : Casual users who only need the current temperature
Rang 62. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 25 324 notes
38sur 100
A local Huntsville app with live streams from local meteorologists, but notifications lag 15 minutes, radar loses tornado-cone layers after updates, and ads block emergency content.
Points forts : Live broadcast from local meteorologists during tornado warnings.
Reproches : Tornado notifications arrive 15 minutes after the event, when the danger has either passed or become critical.
Pour qui : Residents of northern Alabama tracking tornadoes through local meteorologists
Rang 63. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 22 106 notes
38sur 100
A TV channel with a good audience reputation, but the app regularly fails: the radar flickers during real events, and geolocation confuses users in other states with Virginia warnings. When everything works, it is fairly reliable.
Points forts : Extreme-weather alerts from local meteorologists trusted for years.
Reproches : The radar behaves erratically exactly when it matters most, during active precipitation.
Pour qui : Richmond residents and the surrounding area loyal to NBC12
Rang 64. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 15 781 notes
38sur 100
The Memphis WMC5 app declined sharply after recent updates: the radar is broken, voice notifications are gone, and the screen is covered in intrusive ads.
Points forts : Previously reliable for tornado and severe-storm warnings in the Memphis area.
Reproches : The future radar cuts off at the halfway point on the timeline and does not show the full 24 hours.
Pour qui : Greater Memphis residents attached to their home channel
Rang 65. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 12 546 notes
38sur 100
An NHC tropical-storm data aggregator with global coverage, but ads have become so aggressive that users mass-delete the app: there is no way to close an ad and reach the satellite view. The data quality itself, when accessible, remains decent.
Points forts : Official hurricane tracks and satellite imagery without editorial filtering.
Reproches : Ads with no close button block all data and have no workaround even during an active hurricane.
Pour qui : Tropical cyclone watchers willing to endure ads for official NHC data
Rang 66. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,2★ · 9 594 notes
38sur 100
The app streams NOAA radio stations, but connectivity only works for some regions; many users have seen an error or silence for years instead of a broadcast. Alerts work well for those lucky enough to have coverage, but radio as the core feature is unreliable.
Points forts : Where the station is available, storm alerts arrive on time with no extra taps.
Reproches : Station coverage is incomplete: Alaska, parts of Texas, Georgia, and other regions cannot connect at all.
Pour qui : US residents who have a working NOAA station in their coverage area
Rang 67. Note des avis : 38 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 6 885 notes
38sur 100
The app is marketed as an emergency monitor but systematically fails at the most critical moment: several users describe a tornado passing within a couple of kilometers with no alert. It works correctly sometimes, but the reliability is too unpredictable for an app that safety depends on.
Points forts : When an alert fires on time, it is loud enough to wake you up.
Reproches : Notifications regularly fail to arrive during active tornado warnings.
Pour qui : Those who want an additional alert layer but not as their only warning source
Rang 68. Note des avis : 37 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 13 438 notes
37sur 100
Charlotte's WSOC-TV built a working ZIP-precise alert system and then broke it with an update: tapping a warning now leads to an ad video instead of the text, daily highs diverge from hourly by 14 degrees, and the radar is periodically completely empty.
Points forts : ZIP-specific alerts do not bother users with warnings from neighboring counties.
Reproches : After an update, the daily and hourly temperature figures diverge significantly with no explanation.
Pour qui : Residents of Charlotte and the North Carolina Piedmont
Rang 69. Note des avis : 37 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 10 208 notes
37sur 100
A local WCSC app with a basic forecast for Charleston, but the meteorologist video stream does not play, the radar lags, and a mismatch between hourly and daily data occurs systematically. Ads block access even to tornado alerts.
Points forts : The local meteorology team is familiar to the audience and commands trust.
Reproches : The radar lags so far that it shows clear skies in the middle of a storm.
Pour qui : Live 5 channel viewers in the Charleston, South Carolina area
Rang 70. Note des avis : 36 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 19 289 notes
36sur 100
Geolocation fails regularly: users in one state get warnings for another. Temperature forecast diverges from the National Weather Service, and wind is reportedly understated by a factor of three according to one reviewer. Alert reliability raises serious questions.
Points forts : During extreme weather events, when everything works, it helps monitor the situation on the road.
Reproches : Geolocation regularly issues warnings for the wrong area; hourly forecasts do not match the radar.
Rang 71. Note des avis : 36 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 9 836 notes
36sur 100
The WALB app for southern Georgia fails at the basic task: during actual precipitation and bad weather the radar stops loading data exactly when it is needed. Temperature forecast accuracy is also questioned by the local audience.
Points forts : The channel's live broadcast during dangerous events is valued by the few users for whom it loads.
Reproches : Radar and geolocation fail precisely during bad weather, when the user is most vulnerable.
Pour qui : Residents of southern Georgia who follow the weather through the WALB channel
Rang 72. Note des avis : 35 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 30 759 notes
35sur 100
A basic weather aggregator without its own data expertise that aggressively hides key features behind a paywall. There are almost no real reviews about forecast accuracy, but plenty of complaints about the limited free tier.
Points forts : Simple and clean interface for basic needs.
Reproches : Hourly forecast and 10-day horizon are locked behind a subscription, making the free version nearly useless.
Pour qui : Casual users who only need to know if it will be warm or cold today
Rang 73. Note des avis : 35 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 14 689 notes
35sur 100
The Cape Girardeau KFVS12 station has a good history of storm warnings, but after an update the radar loads intermittently, tornado warnings get buried under reflectivity layers, and ads interrupt viewing during dangerous weather.
Points forts : Lightning-fast thunderstorm notifications with a strike point near the user's location.
Reproches : The new radar does not show warnings overlaid on reflectivity, making them easy to miss during a storm.
Pour qui : Residents of Missouri and Illinois in the KFVS12 broadcast area
Rang 74. Note des avis : 35 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 8 751 notes
35sur 100
The local WIBW channel is useful during tornado season in Kansas, but the app sends excess notifications even to users who configured only emergency alerts, and temperature sometimes gets stuck at a fixed 70 degrees regardless of actual weather.
Points forts : Video with the tornado's location marked on the map. A rare and useful feature for prairie regions.
Reproches : The notification system is broken: fair-weather alerts arrive instead of the configured emergency warnings.
Pour qui : Kansas residents following tornado season
Rang 75. Note des avis : 35 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 6 221 notes
35sur 100
The radar updates with a delay of several minutes, so a storm arrives before the map shows it. Users get alerts for neighboring counties with no way to configure the zone, and ads interrupt viewing during an emergency.
Points forts : Early severe-weather warnings sometimes beat the default Apple app.
Reproches : The radar lags several minutes behind real conditions.
Pour qui : Residents of southern Wisconsin following the WMTV15 channel
Rang 76. Note des avis : 34 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 5 889 781 notes
34sur 100
Once a strong brand with a wide data network, now turned into an ad showcase. The radar regularly fails to load, and precipitation forecasts contradict reality right in the middle of rain.
Points forts : Thunderstorm and lightning alerts are valued by those who work or spend time outdoors.
Reproches : Precipitation forecast is wrong even within a six-hour window; radar freezes on a good connection.
Pour qui : Background weather browsing without serious plans
Rang 77. Note des avis : 34 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 13 162 notes
34sur 100
Cincinnati's FOX19 has a history of accurate forecasts, but now it is overloaded: notifications wake users at night for minor events, the 24-hour radar has been showing only 12 hours for more than a year, and false rain alerts during clear skies have eroded trust.
Points forts : Step-by-step hourly forecast with temperature by time of day is well structured.
Reproches : Notifications fire for rain and storms that are not near the user's location.
Pour qui : FOX19 viewers in the greater Cincinnati area
Rang 78. Note des avis : 33 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 33 575 notes
33sur 100
KSAT 12 Weather was San Antonio's favorite for its convenient radar and accurate warnings, but after the redesign ads cover the interface, the radar became harder to read, and the app fails to open for some users. The meteorology team's reputation holds; the app's quality does not.
Points forts : The KSAT meteorology team covers dangerous situations quickly and commands high trust among local audiences.
Reproches : After the redesign it is impossible to scroll through the forecast without a pop-up ad, and the radar lost its future time range.
Pour qui : San Antonio residents who already watch KSAT 12 on TV
Rang 79. Note des avis : 33 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 14 390 notes
33sur 100
The Lexington WKYT channel has a loyal audience, but the app is nearly unusable: constant crashes, a radar with an overlay you cannot remove, broken forecast notifications, and video that does not play.
Points forts : The extended forecast and radar observations are accurate enough for week-ahead planning.
Reproches : Notifications redirect to an ad video instead of the warning text, losing critical seconds during dangerous weather.
Rang 80. Note des avis : 32 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 272 183 notes
32sur 100
Visually one of the most beautiful weather apps with excellent photography, but the functional core is weak: the radar shows only the past with no forward forecast, rain forecasts miss active precipitation, and launch takes an unacceptably long time.
Points forts : Stunning photography and an atmospheric design that people pay for even knowing about the weak forecast.
Reproches : The radar shows no forward precipitation movement, and the rain forecast misses active downpours.
Pour qui : Those who value aesthetics over forecast accuracy
Rang 81. Note des avis : 32 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 50 595 notes
32sur 100
The app fails at the basics: it cannot find geolocation on newer iPhones, the forecast reportedly does not match reality across several reviews, and the interface is hard to navigate. The one positive noted by a user is a one-off wind accuracy win.
Points forts : One user noted that the wind forecast was more accurate than Weather Channel.
Reproches : Geolocation does not work on modern iPhones, and forecast accuracy is supported only by isolated cases.
Pour qui : Not recommended for anyone in its current state
Rang 82. Note des avis : 31 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 144 523 notes
31sur 100
Temperature does not update in real time and requires a forced restart, there is no radar function at all, and the app adds foreign cities to the saved list without user permission. A pretty picture with a broken engine.
Points forts : Attractive design and animated backgrounds that appeal to those who value the visual side.
Reproches : Temperature does not refresh on its own, there is no radar, and the city list gets polluted with unwanted locations.
Pour qui : Someone who wants a beautiful widget on screen rather than an accurate forecast
Rang 83. Note des avis : 31 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 7 330 notes
31sur 100
The app missed tornado warnings and gave weather for a neighboring city instead of the actual location. The radar redirected users to another continent, and the interface is cluttered with fake virus-warning ads.
Points forts : A broad set of weather data from NOAA sources.
Reproches : Geolocation often locks onto a neighboring, larger weather station rather than the user's actual location.
Pour qui : Those willing to tolerate ads for raw NOAA data
Rang 84. Note des avis : 30 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 29 724 notes
30sur 100
A NOAA radar in a beautiful shell but with slow image loading and a weak free feature set. The paid version does not meet expectations for a significant share of buyers.
Points forts : Detailed fire-risk conditions and atmospheric indicators.
Reproches : Radar images load so slowly that the picture is already outdated by the time it appears.
Pour qui : Users who want official NOAA data in a polished wrapper
Rang 85. Note des avis : 30 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 20 545 notes
30sur 100
Temperature diverges from reality by 5-10 degrees Fahrenheit, the widget shows wrong values, and the radar does not match other systems. No strong points could be identified from the reviews.
Points forts : Some users like the visual readability of the in-app map.
Reproches : Precipitation forecast regularly does not match what is happening outside.
Pour qui : A random audience with no distinct profile
Rang 86. Note des avis : 30 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,8★ · 14 343 notes
30sur 100
The Chattanooga Local 3 app has a team that viewers value personally, but the product itself lags seriously: the radar is often blank on opening, the forecast changes several times a day, and ads cover the screen during storms.
Points forts : The local meteorology team issues early tornado warnings that users say have saved lives.
Reproches : The next-day forecast often does not match reality, and the app itself acknowledges this through frequent revisions.
Pour qui : Local residents of the Chattanooga and northern Alabama area
Rang 87. Note des avis : 29 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,6★ · 397 426 notes
29sur 100
A beautiful interface hides an unreliable weather model: temperature diverges from reality by 10 degrees or more, the apparent temperature shows physically impossible values, and radar layers remain gray instead of showing data.
Points forts : Visually pleasant layout with golden-hour and moon-phase times. Appealing to photographers and nature lovers.
Reproches : Temperature forecast systematically diverges from the actual reading by tens of degrees for users across different countries.
Pour qui : Those who want a pretty picture rather than an accurate forecast
Rang 88. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 33 205 notes
28sur 100
A local Detroit app that a poor redesign destroyed: the radar lost forward-scrolling, navigation became confusing, and ads turned aggressive. Users are leaving in numbers, but the historical rating holds.
Points forts : Previously offered the best local radar with a 2-hour forward forecast.
Reproches : The radar shows only the past and present; forward scrolling is gone.
Pour qui : Detroit residents who have not yet found a replacement
Rang 89. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,7★ · 18 860 notes
28sur 100
The forecast changes with every opening, and during 6% rain probability a paid subscriber may experience a real downpour. Temperature on the globe diverges from temperature on another screen within the same app. That is a basic inconsistency.
Points forts : The visual presentation on a rotating globe is memorable and eye-catching.
Reproches : The forecast does not update when real weather changes; it shows stale data.
Pour qui : Users attracted by the visual format rather than accuracy
Rang 90. Note des avis : 28 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 7 428 notes
28sur 100
Built for looks, not for weather: widgets freeze on one temperature for weeks, and users explicitly write that the data does not match reality. Forecast accuracy is not a product value here.
Points forts : Visual themes, animations, and home-screen customization.
Reproches : Widgets do not refresh in the background and show stale temperatures.
Pour qui : Those who decorate their phone rather than track the weather
Rang 91. Note des avis : 22 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,5★ · 9 482 notes
22sur 100
Forecasts diverge from actual temperature, days of the week are displayed incorrectly, and the hourly forecast is not tied to local time. Visually pleasant but unreliable as a forecasting tool.
Points forts : Attractive radar graphics that are pleasant to browse even without a subscription.
Reproches : Multi-day forecasts regularly show the wrong day of the week and incorrect temperatures.
Pour qui : Not seriously suitable for anyone in its current state
Rang 92. Note des avis : 20 sur 100. Note sur l’App Store : 4,3★ · 8 596 notes
20sur 100
Aggressively monetized with ads on the launch screen, forecasts confuse precipitation with cloudiness, and unit settings do not save. No competitive advantages in forecasting are apparent.
Points forts : Basic daily forecast loads quickly without extra screens.
Reproches : Precipitation forecast is unreliable: users document "cloudy" during rain and vice versa.
Pour qui : Arguably no one; better free alternatives exist
À propos des chiffres
Deux chiffres — deux sources
Elles aident à comparer les apps, mais ne remplacent pas la vérification de ta propre tâche.
Score des avis · jusqu’à 100
Le score conservé de l’étude inApp sur les textes des avis. Il évalue l’ensemble de l’app dans l’archive, pas la fiabilité d’une fonction précise.
Note de la boutique · jusqu’à 5
La note de la page de l’app au moment de la collecte. La note et la version actuelles peuvent différer.
Dans l’échantillon archivé de ce sujet : 92 apps et 24 055 avis lus. C’est le volume total de l’étude, pas le nombre d’avis par app.
Un écart entre les chiffres ne prouve pas de manipulation. La date de calcul et la méthode complète du score ne sont pas dans l’archive mobile. Compare les descriptions des tâches et les citations sources, et vérifie les conditions dans la version actuelle.
