Where a daily ritual keeps the couple close and the link between phones holds, and where the content runs out and sync breaks. Die besten Werte aus den Rezensionstexten: SumOne (68/100), The Couple (Days in Love) (68) und Lovewick (68).
Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 18.358 Bewertungen
68von 100
Couples genuinely stick with it: they answer questions about each other for years and say it shows how a partner is feeling during the day. It breaks on ads: minute-long clips for 3 pebbles, ads after every question, and sometimes it stops opening after an update with no warning.
Gelobt
Daily questions that spark conversation, learning your partner deeper, sense of connection at a distance, responsive support when moving an account, eggmon pet and small side activities
Kritik
Minute-long ads for a few pebbles, ads after every question, slow currency grind, some questions with a negative slant, VIP became a subscription instead of a one-time buy, crashes and lost access after switching phones
Für wen: A couple that wants to learn about each other daily through questions and is willing to tolerate ads or pay to remove them
Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 2.507 Bewertungen
68von 100
It is a shared journal and days-in-love counter, and people actually keep it for hundreds of days, especially valuing the shared diary with premium. The weak spots are concrete: the counter sometimes miscounts by a day, the app has lost entries and wiped data, it changes language and dates on its own, and an ad pops up on every action. People ask for a relationship-pause option, more free themes, and premium syncing between partners.
Gelobt
Shared couple's journal, days-in-love counter, anniversary tracking, use over hundreds of days, premium themes
Kritik
Counter off by a day, lost entries and wiped data, changes language and dates on its own, ad on every action, premium not visible to the second partner
Für wen: Couples who want a shared relationship journal and day-counter with nice design
Wert aus Rezensionen: 68 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.934 Bewertungen
68von 100
Couples genuinely love the question cards as a prompt to talk over dinner and before bed, plus the memory feed with photos and dates. But a recent update cut free cards from 10 a day down to one, which enraged long-time users who feel cheated. People also complain the app freezes when you answer from a notification and that questions sometimes just won't load.
Gelobt
Question cards for talking over dinner and before bed, memory feed with photo captions, date ideas, tracking important dates
Kritik
Free cards cut from 10 to 1 per day, freezes when answering from a notification, questions sometimes won't load, repeated questions, unavailable in several countries
Für wen: Couples who want a gentle prompt to get to know each other and store shared memories, if they'll pay for full access
Platz 4. Wert aus Rezensionen: 66 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 203.489 Bewertungen
66von 100
Couples value the quality of the questions that help them learn about each other and start conversations they would not start on their own, some discover new things even after decades together. The weakest part is that after showing results the app gives no advice on how to fix the areas where you scored low, the questions grow stale over time, and the head-to-head mini-games annoy many people. There is a lot of anger about being charged for a full year at once and about the subscription not being obvious upfront.
Gelobt: Quality and depth of the questions, helps you learn about your partner and start awkward conversations, works even for long-together couples, secret missions
Kritik: No advice on how to improve areas you scored low on, questions get stale and repeat, versus games annoy people, questions aimed at long-term couples not new ones, charged for a full year at once and unclear subscription
Für wen: Couples who want to learn more about each other and get talking, and are willing to pay a subscription
Platz 5. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 925.023 Bewertungen
62von 100
People genuinely love watching how many days and months their relationship has lasted and sharing that counter to social media. But the app nags for a rating far too aggressively, the popup shows up every single time you open it and even covers the screen when someone wants a screenshot. The feature set is narrow, and one user honestly asks for birthdays and important dates about his partner.
Gelobt: Days and months relationship counter, simplicity, accurate count, sharing the counter anywhere
Kritik: Constant rate-this-app popup appears on every open, blocks the screen and gets in the way of screenshots, very little to do beyond the counter itself
Für wen: Couples who just want to see and show off how long they have been together
Platz 6. Wert aus Rezensionen: 62 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 7.840 Bewertungen
62von 100
Couples, especially long-distance, take to the daily questions, daily photos and widgets, and people say they learn things they'd never think to ask. It breaks on money and small glitches: you pay per partner separately, every update hides more behind a subscription, and drawing gets laggy over time while the camera sometimes fails to upload a photo.
Gelobt: Daily questions for closeness, daily photos of each other, home-screen widgets, drawing on a shared canvas, the streak as a ritual, long-distance help, oddly deep questions about a partner
Kritik: You pay per partner separately, every update hides more behind a subscription, drawing gets laggy over time, camera sometimes won't upload a photo, a 2-question daily limit, odd or inappropriate questions, can't write your own questions
Für wen: A long-distance couple that wants a daily ritual of questions and photos and is fine paying for two
Platz 7. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 53.867 Bewertungen
60von 100
Couples say the app genuinely helps them open up and have deeper conversations, and for many it is a great foundation for the relationship. But it hurts a lot that the free part was cut in half, from four daily activities with your partner down to two, and the tree itself will not grow without a subscription. It is also technically shaky, streaks break for a day or two, the weekly check-in gets stuck and does not refresh, plus many complaints about being charged after supposedly cancelling.
Gelobt: Helps you open up and have deeper conversations, daily activities and quizzes, the growing relationship tree metaphor, simplicity and engagement
Kritik: Free tier cut from four daily activities to two, the tree will not grow without a subscription, streaks break for a day or two, the weekly check-in gets stuck and will not refresh, quizzes run out in a couple of months and repeat, charges after cancellation
Für wen: Couples who want to talk more deeply and work on the relationship every day, and are willing to pay
Platz 8. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 10.668 Bewertungen
60von 100
A cute tracker couples take to: it counts days, minutes and seconds together, keeps the first kiss and first date, sends love quotes and lets you change themes. It breaks where it matters: you can't count up instead of down, notifications glitch with wrong dates, and after a phone reset people lose all their events with no way to restore.
Gelobt: Counting days, minutes and seconds together, keeping key dates like the first date, love quotes to send each other, changeable themes, accuracy down to the exact start time
Kritik: Can't switch to count-up, wrong dates in new-milestone notifications, all events lost after a phone reset with no recovery, many features behind a subscription, ads in what is basically a calendar, a forgotten passcode with no password reset
Für wen: A couple that loves marking dates and relationship milestones and wants a pretty tracker with reminders
Platz 9. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 2.134 Bewertungen
60von 100
It is a shared calendar for couples, taken to coordinate work schedules, plan dates, keep wishlists and keep both partners in the loop, syncing with Google, Outlook and Apple. It breaks at the free-versus-paid line: without paying you cannot see your partner's events or the whole month, only a week, which kills the point. There are bugs: widgets go white after an update, dates vanish on iOS 26, and the calendar sometimes wipes itself. The forced AI assistant is annoying and cannot be turned off.
Gelobt: Shared couple's calendar, coordinating work schedules, planning dates, wishlists, syncing with Google and Outlook, responsive developer
Kritik: Cannot see partner's events or the full month without paying, widgets go white, dates vanish on iOS 26, calendar wipes itself, forced AI assistant
Für wen: Busy couples and spouses who need to merge work schedules, dates and to-dos into one shared calendar
Platz 10. Wert aus Rezensionen: 60 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.917 Bewertungen
60von 100
Couples value a fully private chat just for two, where photos stay blurred until you tap and messages never mix with regular texts. The job they hire it for is clear: intimate talk with no risk kids or CarPlay expose it. It breaks on reliability: messages don't arrive, an encryption-key error wipes old photos and messages, and videos longer than 45 seconds won't upload.
Gelobt: Private channel just for two, photos blurred until tapped, warming up before date night, protection from kids or CarPlay accidentally exposing it
Kritik: Messages sometimes don't arrive, encryption-key error erases old chats, short video limit, can't resend gallery photos inside the app, weak support
Für wen: Couples, especially with kids or traveling, who need to talk intimately and privately apart from regular messengers
Platz 11. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 40.939 Bewertungen
58von 100
Long-distance couples love this shared cozy home where you can swap furniture, set a mood through light and answer a daily question, and for many it is a way to stay together across distance. But people are furious that almost everything is pushed behind a subscription, including previously free items and viewing old answers, and the new PLUS tier feels like it holds their history hostage. There are not enough emotions in the mood light, no room for more than two partners, and lately request-timed-out errors keep breaking sync.
Gelobt: Shared cozy home for a couple, decorating and customizing the room, mood light indicator, daily question and trivia games, caring for a shared pet, long-distance connection
Kritik: Almost everything behind a subscription including previously free items and viewing old answers, the new PLUS tier feels like it holds your history hostage, too few emotion options in the mood light, cannot add a third partner, request-timed-out errors and broken sync, weak support
Für wen: Couples, especially long-distance, who want a shared cozy space and a daily ritual
Platz 12. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 13.235 Bewertungen
58von 100
When you land on the right therapist, people praise it sincerely and say they feel helped and that remote therapy is convenient. Everything around it breaks: charges with no sessions scheduled, penalties for missing when the app freezes, no way to remove an ex-partner after a breakup, and video sessions that freeze and glitch.
Gelobt: Convenient remote couples therapy, strong therapists on a good match, smooth connection to a counselor, available classes and recordings of missed ones
Kritik: Charges with no sessions delivered, penalties for a miss caused by app glitches, no live support beyond email, can't remove an ex-partner, broken partner invite links, freezing video calls, cases of an unprofessional therapist
Für wen: A couple that needs remote therapy and is willing to gamble on the therapist match and put up with technical failures
Platz 13. Wert aus Rezensionen: 58 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 3.081 Bewertungen
58von 100
The core function works well and keeps people for years: a widget with a day-counter, the relationship start date, anniversaries and birthdays, plus daily quotes. Customization breaks down: you cannot properly set your own photo on the widget, the app swaps it for its own picture, the shared photo drops off, and entered dates sometimes vanish. The long ad on launch is annoying.
Gelobt: Days-together counter, anniversary and birthday tracking, daily quotes, nice design, years of stable use
Kritik: Cannot set your own widget photo, app swaps the picture, shared photo drops off, dates vanish, long ad on launch
Für wen: Couples who want a simple, pretty widget with a relationship counter and reminders of important dates
Platz 14. Wert aus Rezensionen: 57 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 21.096 Bewertungen
57von 100
Long-term couples keep Between as their main way to communicate instead of regular texts, valuing the private separate channel, stickers, shared calendar and photo cloud. The huge pain is that for some people old photos and years of chats suddenly vanish, files older than a few months turn into gray boxes, and support goes silent for months. On top of that the app has not been updated in a long time, there are no reactions or replies to messages, and by today's standards it is a very basic messenger.
Gelobt: Private separate communication instead of iMessage, stickers, shared calendar, cloud and days-together counter, reliability in everyday chat for long-term couples
Kritik: Sudden loss of old photos and years of chats, files older than a few months turn into gray boxes, support goes silent for months, app not updated in a long time, no reactions or replies to messages, crashes on older iPhones
Für wen: Couples who want a permanent separate private channel for communication instead of regular texts, and can live with a very basic feature set
Platz 15. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 97.700 Bewertungen
55von 100
People genuinely love drawing notes by hand and seeing them on their partner's widget, and for long-distance relationships it is a warm connection, almost like Snapchat for those not allowed to have it. But the app badly lets people down on reliability, notes often fail to send with an error, the widget does not refresh in the background so you have to open it manually, and long 30-40 minute drawings sometimes just will not send. A sore spot is streaks, they charge to repair them, and after 200 days the blooming vine effect stops working.
Gelobt: Hand-drawn notes on your partner's widget, warm long-distance connection, sharing photos and drawings, counter of days with your person, Snapchat-like vibe
Kritik: Notes often fail to send and crash with an error, widget does not refresh in the background so you must open it manually, paid streak repair, the blooming vine effect breaks after 200 days, cannot add more than one person, crashes and freezes
Für wen: Couples and close friends, especially long-distance, who care about hand-drawn notes and a shared streak
Platz 16. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 24.936 Bewertungen
55von 100
Couples value the daily question and the structured lessons, and for some it is a lifeline when in-person couples therapists are unavailable but they still want to work on the relationship. But the app is technically shaky, answers sometimes do not save, dates and times drift, sync lags, and old progress gets in the way of starting fresh. Many are put off by the high price, which they compare to real therapy, and by the murky cancellation where the app and website bounce you back and forth.
Gelobt: Quality of the daily question and lessons, structured exercises and date-night workshops, helps when in-person therapy is unavailable, responsive support for some people
Kritik: Answers sometimes do not save and dates drift, sync delays, old progress gets in the way of starting over, high price comparable to therapy, confusing cancellation where app and website bounce you around, too little content for a subscription, no mediator for discussing answers together
Für wen: Couples and spouses who want to work on the relationship in a structured way and can accept therapy-level pricing
Platz 17. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 3.857 Bewertungen
55von 100
People get it for hand-drawn notes and a widget with the partner's photo on the home screen, and long-distance couples especially value swapping little notes every day. What ruins it is a flood of ads and that almost everything runs into the subscription: without premium notes often will not send. There are bugs too: the widget goes white, drawing lags, and you cannot zoom the canvas.
Gelobt: Hand-drawn notes, widget with partner's photo on screen, swapping notes long-distance, Lifetime for 14 dollars
Kritik: Tons of ads, notes will not send without premium, widget goes white and breaks, drawing lags, cannot zoom canvas
Für wen: Couples and close friends who want to swap cute hand-drawn notes and keep each other's photo on the home screen
Platz 18. Wert aus Rezensionen: 55 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.881 Bewertungen
55von 100
The cute art and a shared forest the couple grows together by answering daily questions genuinely hook people. But many complain trees and logs drop far too randomly, and the free version is buried under 30-second ads. There are also frequent technical failures: blank or gray screens, losing the connection to your partner, freezing and phone overheating after ads, plus questions that spark fights more than closeness.
Gelobt: Cute art and pets, a shared forest the couple grows together, daily questions for openness, cheap one-time premium for both partners
Kritik: Too many 30-second ads without premium, logs and trees drop too randomly, blank or gray screen, losing connection to partner, phone overheating and freezing, questions sometimes spark fights
Für wen: Young couples who enjoy a cute pet-and-questions game, if they'll make a one-time premium purchase to remove ads
Platz 19. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 33.949 Bewertungen
52von 100
Couples value the widgets, daily questions and shared quizzes as a reason to stay in touch. But people are put off that the free version gives you literally one set from each category before hitting a wall, so many call it a demo. The AI images in the prompts feel cheap, the daily-streak reset time is inconvenient, and every update seems to reset the streak with a paid repair.
Gelobt: Couple widgets, daily questions and check-ins, shared quizzes, fun time together
Kritik: Almost everything behind a subscription with only one free set per category feels like a demo, AI images in the prompts look cheap, inconvenient streak reset time and frequent resets after updates with paid repair, inaccurate location widget
Für wen: Couples who want light daily questions and widgets, if they are willing to pay a subscription
Platz 20. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 18.336 Bewertungen
52von 100
Almost everyone likes the idea: mark how full your partner's love tank is and get ideas to care for them in their love language. It breaks on execution: people can't figure out how to share goals and mark them done, and the note you write when rating the tank is only visible to you, which many call the biggest failure.
Gelobt: The five love languages concept, the love tank as a way to signal your state to a partner, daily prompt ideas for caring, help with long-distance relationships
Kritik: Unclear how to share goals and mark them complete, the note on a tank rating isn't visible to the partner, tiny unreadable text, keyboard hides the partner's message, can't mark a goal for a past day, a partner is mandatory to finish the quiz
Für wen: A couple that already knows about love languages and is willing to work through a non-obvious interface for shared caring
Platz 21. Wert aus Rezensionen: 52 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 4.194 Bewertungen
52von 100
The app hooks couples with a day-counter widget and a shared virtual pet, and that is what people love, especially in long-distance relationships. It breaks on the coin economy: the pet is constantly out of food, they added sleep and potty with no free option, and coins drain fast. There are also complaints about battery drain, phone overheating, and basic things like the partner map being locked behind payment.
Platz 22. Wert aus Rezensionen: 50 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 5.102 Bewertungen
50von 100
The app looks pretty and handy, and couples like the design and notifications on meaningful dates. But nearly every other review is about one thing: there are too many ads, they're intrusive, and removing them costs money, which annoys many.
Gelobt: Pretty design, convenience, notifications on meaningful dates, cute look, a countdown for couples
Kritik: Too many intrusive ads, ad removal only for money, can't change gender in the profile, won't open on an old iPhone 6s after an update
Für wen: A couple that cares about a pretty relationship counter and is willing to tolerate ads or pay to remove them
Platz 23. Wert aus Rezensionen: 50 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 2.387 Bewertungen
50von 100
Couples get it to swap story photos that show up right on each other's home screen and for a countdown widget to their next meeting, especially long-distance. It breaks at sign-in: it keeps logging you out, creates duplicate accounts, loses data, and will not let you set an avatar. After the trial the free mode shrinks to one snap every 12 hours and a lot goes behind payment, plus battery drain. People ask for plain messaging and reactions.
Gelobt: Swapping story photos on the home screen, countdown to the next meeting, sense of connection long-distance, ease of use
Kritik: Keeps logging out and losing the account, duplicate profiles, avatar will not set, one snap every 12 hours after trial, battery drain
Für wen: Long-distance couples who want to swap photo moments and see a countdown to their next meeting on screen
Platz 24. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 374.368 Bewertungen
48von 100
A sweet idea, raising a shared virtual pet with a friend or partner and keeping a widget on your screen, and people genuinely enjoy it. But the economy is tuned so hard that coins are painful to earn, pets get hungry every 30 minutes, and ads pop up literally every time you come back to the app, sometimes without paying out the promised reward. A couple of people hit a fake malware ad and nearly got signed up for a paid plan by accident.
Gelobt: Shared pet with a friend or partner, pet widget on the home screen, mini-games together, cute design, helps stay connected without texting
Kritik: Too many long ads up to two minutes, coins are very hard to earn and pets get hungry every 30 minutes, ad rewards sometimes not credited, fake malware ads slip through, easy to accidentally start a paid plan
Für wen: Friends and couples, especially long-distance, who want shared cute pet care instead of texting
Platz 25. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,4★ · 3.475 Bewertungen
48von 100
It is a set of deep questions for couples, good for passing an evening at a bar or getting a boyfriend and girlfriend to open up to each other. The catch is that almost all the meaningful content sits behind a 7.99-a-week subscription, and people call the free questions basic and generic. Many are annoyed that it begs for a rating every third action and that there is no interaction between partners inside the app.
Gelobt: Deep questions for couples, helps you open up to each other, good for passing an evening together
Kritik: Meaningful questions behind a 7.99-weekly plan, free questions are basic, constant rating prompts, no partner interaction
Für wen: Couples who want a ready set of questions for a heart-to-heart over an evening, if the weekly charge is fine
Platz 26. Wert aus Rezensionen: 48 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,8★ · 1.663 Bewertungen
48von 100
A quiz game where couples guess each other's answers works as a talking prompt, especially long distance, and people get pulled into deeper topics. But the core breakage shows up again and again: answers and questions don't sync between partners, phones show different questions when compared, and matches are effectively made up. It also freezes often, and questions run out fast after paying for premium.
Gelobt: Quiz guessing your partner's answers, a prompt to talk long distance, helps dig into topics deeper, easy start for a new couple
Kritik: Answers and questions don't sync between partners, matches come out fabricated, freezes often and won't open, questions run out fast after paying, awkward wording
Für wen: Couples, especially long distance, who want to learn about each other through a quiz, if they can tolerate the sync problems and running out of questions
Platz 27. Wert aus Rezensionen: 46 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 2.246 Bewertungen
46von 100
The core is simple and clear: a relationship tracker with a days-together counter and a timeline of events, and some like it as a cute way to follow the relationship. It breaks because the most basic things are paid: you cannot even see the relationship start date or set your own photo without a subscription, and the pay screen jumps up on every open. There are bugs: the timeline hits a limit and will not let you add events, and support does not respond.
Gelobt: Days-together counter, relationship event timeline, cute and clear design, easy way to follow the relationship
Kritik: Day-counter and your own photo only with a subscription, pay screen on every open, ads, timeline hits a limit, support silent
Für wen: Couples who want a simple days-together tracker with a timeline, if they are fine paying for basic features
Platz 28. Wert aus Rezensionen: 42 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 5.655 Bewertungen
42von 100
The game itself lands with couples and friends: they laugh, compete and learn about each other through quizzes. But it breaks on two things: 60 seconds of ads on every launch and after almost every action, and a paid premium that widely fails to apply, so the clips don't go away, quizzes stay locked, and support doesn't reply.
Gelobt: Fun quizzes for couples and friends, a reason to laugh and compete, learning about each other through questions, good for a date night at home
Kritik: 60 seconds of ads on launch and after almost every action, ads hard to close, paid premium not applied, ads remain even after paying, quizzes stay locked after purchase, a partner doesn't receive their share of the subscription, silent support, half a year with no updates
Für wen: A couple or friends wanting a laugh for an evening, if they can tolerate an ad barrage and possibly pay for premium in vain
Platz 29. Wert aus Rezensionen: 40 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 3.500 Bewertungen
40von 100
The idea is strong: a private couple's chat, questions, exercises and prompts that genuinely open up talk about feelings, and some people have used it for years. But the tech keeps failing: chat does not work between iPhone and Samsung, the app freezes and drops to a white screen after first launch, and quizzes will not submit. On top of that it nags for a review after every step and charges 60 dollars a year with no monthly option.
Gelobt: Private couple's chat, questions and exercises for talking about feelings, help communicating with a partner, thoughtful prompts
Kritik: Chat fails between iPhone and Android, freezes and white screen, quizzes will not submit, nagging review prompts, no monthly plan
Für wen: Couples willing to pay for a yearly plan for structured exercises and questions, if both actually engage
Platz 30. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,9★ · 22.881 Bewertungen
38von 100
The idea is simple, truth or dare for a couple or friends, and it does get a conversation going and opens up communication. But the content quickly starts repeating, the free tier is thin, and the paid packs ask you to pay again when you switch phones or after restoring a purchase. People complain that even the extreme level is bland, and that this app is basically a copy of another of their own games with the same content.
Gelobt: Simple truth-or-dare format for a couple or friends, opens up communication and conversation, easy interface
Kritik: Content repeats fast and there is little of it, thin free tier and pricey paid packs, even the extreme level is bland, purchases ask you to pay again when you switch phones, basically a copy of another of their own games, does not work offline
Für wen: Couples or groups who want a light truth-or-dare game to spark conversation, with low expectations
Platz 31. Wert aus Rezensionen: 38 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 1.659 Bewertungen
38von 100
People like the idea: quizzes spark conversations they'd never start on their own, plus there are shared doodles, notes and widgets for your partner, which helps long distance. But a huge share of the content is locked behind payment, and even after one partner buys, the other gets asked to pay again. Add the bugs: freezing on entering the anniversary, completed games resetting, being asked to pay again after buying. The text average is just 2.76 against 4.61 in the store, and the praise five-stars sound suspiciously promotional.
Gelobt: Quizzes spark unusual conversations, shared doodles and notes for your partner, widgets, helps long-distance couples
Kritik: Almost everything locked behind payment, second partner asked to pay after the first buys, freezes on entering the anniversary, completed games reset, asked to pay again after buying
Für wen: Long-distance couples who want quizzes and widgets to stay connected, if they'll pay and put up with progress resets
Platz 32. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,6★ · 4.831 Bewertungen
30von 100
The idea appeals: a partner's status on the lock screen and widgets, a shared pet, photos back and forth, and people kept and loved it for years. But right now the product is down: sign-in throws 503 and temporarily-unavailable, the shared pet shows up for no one, photos and stickers won't load, and it isn't fixed even for those who bought lifetime access.
Gelobt: Partner's status on the lock screen and widgets, custom status, a shared pet, photo exchange, an easy way to keep each other updated through the day, some free features
Kritik: 503 and temporarily-unavailable errors on sign-in, the shared pet invisible to everyone, photos and stickers won't load, notifications broken, slow loading, unfixed even for lifetime buyers, some of the good stuff behind pro
Für wen: A couple that wants a partner's status on screen and a shared pet, but the app is too broken right now to recommend
Platz 33. Wert aus Rezensionen: 30 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 2.949 Bewertungen
30von 100
The idea is good: a daily question for couples as a reason to talk and learn about each other, and some built it into a morning ritual. But free gives you exactly one question a day, everything else is behind a 5-dollar-weekly plan, and the content barely updates: half a year with no new questions, Christmas and New Year themes shown in spring. There are bugs: answers get attributed to the wrong partner, money is charged on the first trial day, and it will not open.
Gelobt: Daily question to spark talk, a reason to learn about your partner, helps start conversations in long relationships
Kritik: One free question a day, everything behind a 5-dollar-weekly plan, content not updated for half a year, answers attributed to the wrong person, charge on the first trial day
Für wen: Couples in long relationships who want a daily reason to talk, if they are fine paying for a thin set
Platz 34. Wert aus Rezensionen: 28 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,5★ · 11.277 Bewertungen
28von 100
The first lesson sometimes lands and a few feel the material is worth the time, but the content is a mixed bag pulled from different frameworks with no coherence. It breaks on money and bait-and-switch: the subscription can't be cancelled through Apple, they charge 50-75 dollars with no refund, and instead of the promised couples help the app drifts into erectile-dysfunction content and demands extra pay for a coach.
Gelobt: A few lessons on attraction and needs, easy-medium-hard difficulty levels, quick support response to an email
Kritik: Subscription not cancellable through Apple, hidden 50-dollar monthly charge, 75-dollar charges with no refund, incoherent content across frameworks, signs of AI text and filler, topic swapped from relationships to erectile dysfunction, extra pay for a coach
Platz 35. Wert aus Rezensionen: 24 von 100. App-Store-Bewertung: 4,7★ · 6.437 Bewertungen
24von 100
While it works, couples take to it: the questions and games make them more aware of their relationship, and some call it modern therapy. But the product breaks systematically: people get logged out right after signing in, paid annual accounts vanish without a trace, notifications either don't arrive or dump overnight in a pile, and support goes silent for weeks.
Gelobt: Questions and games raise relationship awareness, help a couple discuss hard things like adults, a finances topic, that early-dating feeling again
Kritik: Logged out right after signing in, paid annual accounts disappear, support unresponsive for weeks, notifications broken or dumped overnight, much of the good stuff locked behind premium, can't see half of a partner's answers without paying, a promised free entry turns into a charge
Für wen: A couple willing to risk money for questions and games, but the product is too unstable right now to recommend
Zu den Bewertungen
Zwei Bewertungen — zwei Quellen
Sie helfen beim Vergleich von Apps, ersetzen aber nicht die Prüfung der eigenen Aufgabe.
Rezensionsbewertung · bis 100
Die gespeicherte Bewertung aus der inApp-Recherche zu den Rezensionstexten. Sie beurteilt die App im Archiv insgesamt, nicht die Zuverlässigkeit einer einzelnen Funktion.
Store-Bewertung · bis 5
Die Bewertung von der App-Seite zum Zeitpunkt der Datenerhebung. Aktuelle Bewertung und Version können abweichen.
In der archivierten Stichprobe dieses Themas: 35 Apps und 10.688 gelesene Rezensionen. Das ist der Gesamtumfang der Recherche, nicht die Zahl der Rezensionen pro App.
Ein Abstand zwischen den Bewertungen beweist keine Manipulation. Das Datum der Berechnung und die vollständige Methodik der Bewertung sind nicht im mobilen Archiv. Vergleich die Aufgabenbeschreibungen und die Originalzitate und prüf die Bedingungen in der aktuellen Version.
