A reliable offline password manager with cross-platform sync via cloud storage. The main weakness is no iCloud support, and occasional sync failures can lead to data loss.
評価点
Simplicity and stability over many years, simultaneous support for Android and iOS, encryption via Google Drive and Dropbox, easy transfer when switching phones.
不満点
No iCloud sync, periodic Google Drive errors (404), after iOS updates it sometimes locks access with no way to reset the master password, some users dislike the interface refresh.
向いている人：Users who want a simple, affordable password manager without a subscription and with sync between Android and iPhone.
A KeePass-compatible password manager with an open database format, Wi-Fi sync, and security key support. Quality declined after a change of ownership: previously hidden bugs have become more frequent, and upgrade prompts now chase even Pro users.
評価点
Open KeePass format (no lock-in), solid iCloud sync, Yubikey and passkeys support, autofill, export to standard formats, lifetime license.
不満点
Quality has slipped since the app changed hands: crashes on database open, upgrade pop-ups for Pro users, passkeys issues (crashes on save), cross-platform purchases don't sync across devices.
向いている人：Technically savvy Apple users who want an open database format and prefer not to rely on a cloud service.
The best choice for storing passwords offline in KeePass format. Its strength is full privacy with no cloud server required, its weakness is unreliable autofill and iCloud sync issues.
評価点
Fully offline with no data shared with third parties. Passkeys and TOTP support. Independent security audit by Cure53. Actively maintained. Fast import.
不満点
Autofill is unreliable and sometimes fails in banking apps. Issues with iCloud Drive after iOS updates. Occasional hangs when loading the database. No native Android or Windows clients.
向いている人：Technical users who already use KeePass and want to keep their data on-device only.
A mature cross-platform password manager with a real long-term user base. Strong point is reliable sync and a solid password generator. The main complaint is an aggressive paywall and problems when the free plan was dropped.
評価点：Sync across all devices, strong password generator, family plan with shared access, autofill works consistently.
不満点：Holds passwords hostage on non-payment, unclear login flow for existing accounts, transferring to a new device can be tricky, passwords disappear after reconnection, browser extension may be blocked by corporate policies.
向いている人：Users willing to pay for a cross-platform manager with a convenient family plan.
A market veteran with a twenty-year track record: stable, simple, no subscription. The main pain point is that sync between devices is unreliable, especially without a desktop in the mix.
評価点：Decades of reliable operation, support helps with data migration, works across platforms (Mac, PC, iPhone), no subscription, straightforward interface.
不満点：Sync without a PC doesn't work or is unreliable, no automatic cloud backup, can't enlarge password text, no image storage within entries, OneDrive integration is broken.
向いている人：Apple ecosystem users with a PC who want reliable storage without a subscription and don't need modern features like passkeys.
A time-tested manager with good sync via your own cloud account, but it suffers from passwords disappearing after updates and aggressive new paid tiers appearing after each update.
評価点：Works across multiple browsers and devices, free basic tier, stores data in a user-chosen cloud (not the company's servers), regular updates.
不満点：Passwords disappear after updates without warning, sync between devices is unreliable, the company repeatedly introduces new paid tiers on top of already-purchased licenses, problems on Windows 11, family sharing is hard to set up.
向いている人：Users with a single device or a small number of passwords who want to store data in their own cloud without a subscription.
The best free open-source password manager for the price-to-features ratio, but recent updates introduced serious bugs: the master password sometimes refuses to work, TOTP behind a paywall feels greedy, and cross-device sync is slow.
評価点：Completely free with no ads, open-source, works on all platforms, no upsell pressure.
不満点：Master password periodically fails for no apparent reason, TOTP is paid-only, slow sync, a bug shows phantom TOTP codes on entries that don't have one.
向いている人：Technically minded users who want a solid free manager and can tolerate occasional bugs.
A mature PasswordSafe-format manager with cross-platform support and a responsive developer, but switching to a new iPhone repeatedly breaks database access unacceptable for a password storage tool.
評価点：PasswordSafe format ensures compatibility with Windows and Mac, developer responds to bug reports and ships updates, Dropbox and iCloud sync, users have run the app for more than 10 years.
不満点：Switching to a new iPhone has caused database loss for multiple users, cloud backup is pushed with aggressive notifications, local iOS-to-desktop sync is inconvenient, the UI is dated, some versions confused users with duplicate database copies.
向いている人：Experienced users who need PasswordSafe-compatible format and cross-platform access, and who are prepared to keep a separate backup of their database.
A password generation utility from a Germany-based developer with EU-compliant privacy practices. Works well as a companion to a primary password manager, but has a bug: it generates passwords longer than the requested character count.
評価点：Works reliably for years, EU-standard privacy policy, developer responds to support requests, no data collection, the core password-generation function does its job.
不満点：Generates passwords longer than the specified length, doesn't honor all selected criteria for short passwords, no cloud backup, annoying review-request pop-ups, Face ID enters an infinite loop after updates.
向いている人：Users who need a simple password generator without data sharing, as a companion to a primary vault.
SafeInCloud under a new name: a proven manager with cross-platform cloud sync, but recent updates broke familiar interface elements and frustrated long-time users.
評価点：In use for over 10 years by many users, passkeys support, sync via Google Drive and iCloud, works on Android and iOS, solid support.
不満点：Removed the alphabetical scroll index, an aggressive Premium purchase banner on every launch, passkeys don't work on Mac or in browser extensions, licensing issues when switching platforms, crashes after the latest update.
向いている人：Android and iPhone users who want a reliable cross-platform manager without a third-party cloud subscription.
One of the few password managers that offer local Wi-Fi sync with no cloud involved. Good for privacy-conscious users, but autofill is buggy, there's no password generator, and no 2FA support.
評価点：Offline sync over local network with no cloud data transfer, lifetime license at a fair price, cross-platform (Windows, iOS, Android), stable for long-term users.
不満点：No built-in password generator at the point of entry creation, no 2FA support, autofill sometimes fills in the old password when you change it, Mac import is problematic, installs Rosetta without warning.
向いている人：Users who fundamentally don't want passwords in the cloud and are willing to sync over their home network.
A full-featured password manager with a long history and a real base of loyal users, but with annual price hikes and a migration path designed to be painful.
評価点：Secure storage with notes and attachments, cross-platform sync, long-term users praise stability and support.
不満点：Price has climbed to $42 $91 per year and keeps rising, migration is intentionally difficult, an 'optimization' step on every launch freezes the app for minutes, can't cancel a subscription from within the app.
向いている人：Users willing to pay a premium price who don't plan on switching.
A serious password manager from the Proton team with a strong privacy reputation, but the iOS client is unstable: autofill works intermittently and Face ID can get stuck in a loop.
不満点：Autofill crashes or fails in Safari and Firefox Mobile, Face ID loops after updates, no passkeys on macOS, can't import Safari passwords on iOS without a desktop browser, every new entry triggers a review prompt.
向いている人：Users already in the Proton ecosystem who care about privacy and email aliases and can tolerate rough edges in the iOS client.
A mature offline password manager with a loyal user base that has stuck around for years. The main pain point: migrating from version 5 to version 6 broke backups, and support has effectively gone silent.
評価点：Rich entry fields, tags and folders, Wi-Fi import and export, many template formats, works without cloud storage.
不満点：Backups are incompatible between versions 5 and 6, no export to standard formats (proprietary only), no developer support, freezes on iOS 18, no backup reminder.
向いている人：Users who want an offline vault without cloud dependencies and with a flexible entry structure, and who accept the risk of data loss during updates.
A corporate 2FA tool that just works until it doesn't. The biggest failure: transferring accounts to a new phone is nearly impossible, and push notifications are unreliable.
評価点：Years of stable operation with minimal fuss, quick login confirmation, a sense of security for corporate access.
不満点：No real account transfer between devices, push notifications drop out and force manual code entry, frequent forced updates, no backup login method besides a phone number.
向いている人：Corporate users whose company requires Duo and who have no choice.
A veteran dating back to Palm Pilot days: strong AES-256 encryption, flexible storage, but version 5 broke sync for a significant number of users and the new sync key mechanism is confusing.
評価点：AES-256-CBC with HMAC-SHA512, 256,000 PBKDF2 rounds, no proprietary servers (data stays with the user), flexible entry structure including photos and documents, decades of reliable use.
不満点：Sync broke after updating to version 5 for many users, the sync key mechanism is confusing and poorly documented, autofill performs poorly, no Face ID in the base version, no recovery if the master password is lost.
向いている人：Technically savvy users who value local storage with military-grade encryption and aren't afraid to configure sync manually.
A free password manager within the Norton ecosystem, stable enough for basic tasks, but no passkeys support, occasional connection drops, and constant upsell offers.
評価点：Free for basic use, easy to get started, reliably stores passwords for most sites.
不満点：No passkeys support, unstable connection on mobile, intrusive survey pop-ups, autofill doesn't work on some sites.
向いている人：Existing Norton subscribers who need a simple manager without extra cost.
One of the oldest password managers on the market, strong on core features (storage, SafeNotes), but the UX is dated, autofill is unpredictable, and update 9.9.1 broke launch for some users.
評価点：Years of reliability for loyal users, note and form storage, cross-platform access.
不満点：Autofill doesn't always trigger and doesn't offer to save an updated password, search settings don't persist, weak customer support, some users lost all their data.
向いている人：Users with large archives of notes and forms who can accept an outdated UX.
A cross-platform password manager with category support and Face ID that worked reliably for years. The problem: multiple waves of monetization changes stripped paid users of features they'd already paid for, without explanation.
評価点：Categories for organizing entries, Face ID (when it works), simple interface, good fit for older users, long-standing loyal user base.
不満点：Touch ID unexpectedly moved behind a paywall for users who had already paid, Android purchases don't carry over to iOS, CSV import only works through an iTunes directory, no master password reset.
向いている人：iOS users who want a simple categorized vault and can accept inconsistent monetization.
An old local password manager with no cloud and a devoted following, but search crashes the app, backup is broken, and the developer doesn't respond to support requests.
評価点：Works locally without cloud, simple and fast, long-term users are satisfied with everyday stability, convenient entry organization.
不満点：Search crashes the app, Wi-Fi backup and restore don't work, no export to standard formats (CSV, XLS), developer ignores inquiries, support email is no longer functional, hard to sync between devices.
向いている人：Users who need an offline password manager without a subscription and don't expect technical support.
A minimalist 2FA authenticator that works fine until you change your phone. Losing all codes when switching devices without manual transfer is a systemic problem known to every long-time user.
評価点：No ads or bloat, Google account sync now helps when transferring, simple interface.
不満点：Before cloud sync was added, migration was a disaster, codes occasionally vanish, no way to organize entries into folders or rename them, the QR camera doesn't work for some users.
向いている人：Google ecosystem users who want basic TOTP with no extras.
Apple's built-in password manager that works invisibly for most users, but regularly loses passwords after iOS updates and handles import and export poorly.
評価点：Zero setup on Apple devices, iCloud sync, notifications for compromised passwords, family plan sharing.
不満点：Passwords disappear after OS updates, no proper export, weak support for non-Apple platforms, QR login is unreliable, autofill doesn't work everywhere.
向いている人：Users who live entirely in the Apple ecosystem and don't need cross-platform support.
A mature password manager with a long track record that has badly degraded in recent versions: forced upgrade ads for paying users, Face ID moved behind a paywall, Dropbox sync crashes the app.
評価点：Reliably stores data over years, simple interface for basic tasks, ability to attach photos to entries.
不満点：Face ID is paid-only, aggressive upgrade banners even for subscribers, crashes during Dropbox sync, losing the QR recovery code locks users out of their vault entirely.
向いている人：Long-time users who don't need biometrics and can tolerate aggressive marketing.
A recognizable password manager from Nord that works as a vault, but with irritating systemic issues: it constantly asks for the master password, autofill is inconsistent across sites, the Safari extension was removed without notice, and importing passwords from iPhone is not supported.
評価点：Strong encryption, cross-platform support, a wide range of supported data types, relatively clear interface.
A functional password manager with sync and support that actually responds. The main problem: repeated subscription price hikes of 33 100% in a single year pushed many loyal users to leave.
評価点：Good support (the director personally responded to bugs), many categories, years of reliability for some users, Syncryption backups.
不満点：Recurring price increases of 33 100%, data loss during updates, freezes during alphabetical navigation, bugs after recent updates, the app switched to Spanish with no way to change the language.
向いている人：Users who need sync and live support, and are willing to revisit their subscription regularly.
A simple standalone password manager with a clean design, but the lack of cross-device sync is a critical failure for a product of this type.
評価点：Intuitive interface, a sense of security from local storage, developer is personally reachable (Robert responds to questions), reasonable PRO pricing.
不満点：No real cross-device sync, switching from Android to iOS or changing phones results in data loss, no fingerprint authentication in the base version, license doesn't transfer between platforms, support is slow to respond.
向いている人：Single-device users who want an isolated offline password vault with no cloud.
A solid concept with user-owned encrypted storage, but the product is degrading due to intrusive features and reputational damage from changing terms without notice.
評価点：User owns the vault and chooses where to store it (iCloud, Dropbox, etc.). Works on all platforms. Passkeys and TOTP support. Good value at the lifetime price.
不満点：Forced master password entry on a timer that can't be disabled even in settings. Sync regularly breaks (iPad and Mac). The app forgets a purchased subscription and shows ads. Users report data being transferred to Apple Passwords without consent.
向いている人：Users who want to own their vault and not depend on a provider's cloud, and who can tolerate technical rough edges.
A corporate password manager from Zoho with a solid web version and Chrome extension, but the iOS app crashes regularly and loses sessions. Acceptable for team use via browser.
評価点：Free tier for personal use, good scalability for teams, convenient web version and Chrome extension, centralized password management.
不満点：App freezes and crashes on iOS 16 and iOS 13 Pro, constantly prompts for master password re-entry, Safari autofill doesn't work, support brushes off problems.
向いている人：Small teams and enterprise users who work through a browser not for reliable daily use on iPhone.
Once the gold standard of password managers, now with aggressive monetization: forced subscription instead of a one-time license, regular price increases, UX regressions (removed search, complicated navigation), and support that takes days to respond.
評価点：Good cross-platform coverage for long-time users, solid encryption, Travel Mode.
不満点：Price jumped from $30 to $75 for the family plan, quick search was removed from the home screen, support responds in days or weeks, accounts can be frozen without explanation and there's no phone support.
向いている人：Corporate teams with an IT budget individual users will get the same from Bitwarden or Apple Passwords for free.
A simple offline password manager with a long-term audience, but a critical problem: data disappears when switching devices or after iOS updates, and support is practically unreachable.
評価点：Simple, intuitive interface, works without internet, Dropbox and Wi-Fi sync support, loyal users have relied on it for years.
不満点：Data is lost when switching devices or after iOS updates with no way to recover it, Face ID can permanently block access, no search across entries, support goes silent on inquiries.
向いている人：Users who have maintained a long-running database and don't switch devices for new users the risk of total data loss is too high.
Once a respectable password manager, now disappointing its user base after restricting the free plan to a single device type and letting support quality slide. Loyal users are migrating to Bitwarden.
評価点：Organized storage, convenient to have all passwords in one place, autofill works for most sites.
不満点：No cross-platform access without a paid subscription, frequent random sign-outs, support is unreachable when MFA is locked, mobile interface is clunky, the app prompts to save a password that's already there.
向いている人：Users who have already committed their data and are slow to migrate.
Once a reliable password manager, now without updates for years: a systemic bug where changes don't save on the first attempt and complete developer silence make it risky for storing important credentials.
評価点：Works on Mac and iPhone, no subscription, Apple Watch support for quick password lookup, Wi-Fi sync, worked reliably for old users for years.
不満点：Changes don't save on the first try and must be entered twice, the app hasn't been updated in 3 5 years, support doesn't respond to emails for months, no passkeys or modern security standards, sync is unreliable, data sometimes disappears.
向いている人：No one who is adding new passwords now the product has effectively been abandoned by its developer.
McAfee's password manager that has degraded: autofill stopped working, the app crashes, and sessions reset on their own. It used to be decent, but now it's outclassed by Apple's built-in options.
評価点：Multi-factor authentication, long-time users noted reliability, unlimited notes even on the free tier.
不満点：Autofill doesn't work, the app crashes on login, it signs itself out before the set timeout, you can't change your email or master password, the free tier is capped at 15 passwords, no dark web monitoring or 2FA, the desktop version has been shut down.
向いている人：Existing McAfee subscribers who get the manager bundled in. New users should look elsewhere.
A simple offline password manager for non-technical users, hampered by chronic crashes, data loss, and unresponsive support.
評価点：Simple alphabetical organization. Works without cloud. Long-term users value reliability when it's working.
不満点：The app periodically crashes and won't open, sometimes losing all saved passwords. No backup. Support doesn't respond to emails. No biometrics in older versions. Alphabetical sorting broke after an update.
向いている人：Users who need the simplest possible password list with no autofill or cloud but only if the app is stable.
A bare-bones offline password vault with a 10-entry limit on the free tier. The main problem: no export and no recovery, so forgetting the master password means losing everything.
評価点：Simple interface, works after a one-time payment without a subscription, Face ID support.
不満点：The 10-password cap is hidden until after installation, no data export, no master password reset, one user reports password leaks, complaints about data loss on device changes.
向いている人：Users with a very small number of passwords, willing to accept the risk of losing everything if they forget the master password.
A 2FA authenticator exclusively for the Ubiquiti ecosystem not a general-purpose tool. Crashes on iOS while scrolling, total loss of all 2FA accounts when switching phones with no recovery path, unreliable Apple Watch authentication, and zero documentation.
評価点：Works with push notifications to confirm logins on Ubiquiti devices, Apple Watch integration in theory.
不満点：Crashes while scrolling on current iOS versions, no account transfer when switching phones, Apple Watch doesn't confirm requests, no documentation, works only with Ubiquiti.
向いている人：Ubiquiti equipment owners who don't hit the specific iOS compatibility issues. For everyone else, there's no reason to use it.
A password manager with a long history of loyal users that is now in a degraded state: a Face ID loop, broken export, and unresponsive support make it a risky place to store credentials.
評価点：Simple interface, credit card storage alongside passwords, worked reliably for some users for years.
不満点：Face ID loop blocks app entry (multiple reviews from 2024 2026), export and cross-device sync don't work, users lose all data after switching phones, the support email bounces, no password recovery.
向いている人：Current users with a working version should back up their data immediately and move to another tool.
A simple password vault that moved Face ID behind a paywall without warning, leaving long-time users without convenient login. That complaint accounts for about 60% of all reviews.
評価点：Simple interface, data persists after reinstallation for some users, straightforward navigation.
不満点：Face ID and Touch ID moved to a paid tier without notifying existing users, no support when contacted, Pro status lost after updates, no way to transfer data without paying extra when switching phones.
向いている人：Users with minimal requirements who are willing to enter their master password manually every time.
A basic password vault with no advanced features: no real search, the lock password disables itself spontaneously, and the free tier is capped at 8 10 entries.
評価点：Long-term users report reliability for simple use. Transfers to a new phone.
不満点：App lock password disables itself after a restart. Can't delete entries in some versions. Free tier is capped at 8 passwords with no prior notice. No alphabetical search. Small font.
向いている人：Users with minimal requirements who need to store literally a handful of passwords and don't care about locking security.
An abandoned app with no active maintenance: after iOS updates it regularly stops opening entries and loses data. Some users stay out of long habit, but continuing to use it is risky.
評価点：Simple, user-friendly interface for storing passwords, worked steadily for long-term users before recent iOS updates.
不満点：After iOS updates the app stops working and won't open entries, data is lost with no recovery option, the developer appears to have stopped supporting the product, backups are incompatible between versions.
向いている人：Not recommended for new installs the app is effectively abandoned and unreliable.
A Swiss password manager with a long history that has been broken on mobile since 2024: Face ID doesn't work, every login redirects to a browser, subscriptions expire without warning. Legacy praise holds the store rating up, but the current user experience is unacceptable.
評価点：Worked reliably for years, web version is accessible, document storage is available.
不満点：Face ID has been broken for over a year, every login goes through the browser, no expiration notice for subscriptions, support responds only with form letters.
向いている人：Not recommended for anyone right now until the mobile app is fixed.
評価点：Some users praise the easy initial setup and the presence of a secure photo vault.
不満点：App crashes immediately after entering the password, forced video ads appeared after updates, no way to reset a forgotten master password, support doesn't respond, paid VIP version stops working.
向いている人：Not recommended for anyone unreliability and absent support make it dangerous for storing passwords.
An authenticator that's supposed to make login easier but in practice makes it harder: codes disappear, moving to a new phone requires simultaneous access to the old phone and a computer, and push authorization gets stuck in an endless loop.
評価点：Push notification on computer login is convenient, iCloud backup works for users who have it set up correctly.
不満点：Loss of all codes without warning, extremely difficult migration between devices, the app gets stuck in an approval loop, Stage Manager broken on iPad.
向いている人：Only single-device users with a working LastPass ecosystem everyone else should use Authy or a built-in authenticator.
Once a popular password manager with a 20-year history, now in a state of decline: the app crashes, sync is broken, and support is silent.
評価点：Supports storing arbitrary data beyond passwords (PIN codes, combination locks). Some users value local sync without third-party cloud.
不満点：App crashes on current versions of macOS and iOS. Sync doesn't work. Data is lost when moving between versions. No normal way to cancel a subscription through the interface. A complaint was upheld by the Better Business Bureau. No new features for several years.
向いている人：Not recommended for anyone switching to a modern alternative is the better move.
Zoho's MFA app that is convenient in theory for the Zoho ecosystem but in practice suffers from unreliable push notifications, a freezing interface, and a mandatory notification permission without which some features don't work.
評価点：Good integration with Zoho accounts, supports third-party OTP accounts.
不満点：Push notifications don't arrive or arrive with a delay, authentication loop on phone and laptop, QR scanner freezes after an update, forced notification permission prompt.
向いている人：Strictly Zoho users with no alternative everyone else should use Google Authenticator or Authy.
Microsoft's corporate authenticator that systematically locks users out when they switch phones. The cycle of 'need a code to log in, need to log in to get a code' is documented in dozens of reviews.
評価点：Works steadily as long as you don't need to transfer your account to a new device, protects corporate Microsoft accounts.
不満点：The authentication loop on phone changes makes access impossible, codes and notifications periodically fail to arrive, the approval interface is confusing (easy to mix up Deny and Approve), support is unreachable or offers paid assistance.
向いている人：Corporate users whose IT department has issued Microsoft 365 and who have no choice.
